Guided Surgery for Implant Therapy

Digitally guided root removal and simultaneous implant placement: A case study

BACKGROUND

Encountering a retained root tip post-extraction and prior to implant placement is a possible clinical complication. There are numerous approaches for removing retained roots that may be traumatic or atraumatic. Regardless of the approach, careful treatment planning is important to minimize complications, reduce morbidity, and preserve bony structures. The aim of the current case study is to introduce a technique and digitally generated device used for identifying and atraumatically removing a retained root tip and simultaneously placing a stable dental implant.

METHODS

A 63-year-old female with a history of myocardial infarction, hypertension, and acute pancreatitis presented for implant placement at site #5. Clinical examination revealed adequate interocclusal, mesiodistal, and buccolingual dimensions for implant placement. Radiographic examination using cone beam computed tomography revealed that retained root #5 interfered with implant placement. Digital planning was used to extract the root tip with minimal trauma to maintain adequate bone for simultaneous implant placement with good primary stability.

RESULTS

The follow-ups at 1, 3, and 6 weeks and 4, 8, and 10 months revealed good bone preservation with an osseointegrated implant.

CONCLUSIONS

Employment of digital planning to create a palatal window allowed excellent accuracy in removing the retained root while maintaining the bony foundation for a well osseointegrated dental implant.

KEY POINTS

Pre-planning using cone beam computed tomography scan merged with an intraoral digital scan is necessary for precise location of a retained root and correct implant placement with excellent primary stability. A digitally planned 3D surgical guide is a useful method for extracting retained roots during implant placement to minimize bone damage. Digital planning provides a precise and minimally invasive implant surgery.

Influence of augmented reality technique on the accuracy of autotransplanted teeth in surgically created sockets

BACKGROUND

The objective of the present study was to evaluate the reliability of an augmented reality drilling approach and a freehand drilling technique for the autotransplantation of single-rooted teeth.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty samples were assigned to the following surgical techniques for drilling guidance of the artificial sockets: A. augmented reality technique (AR) (n = 20) and B. conventional free-hand technique (FT) (n = 20). Then, two models with 10 teeth each were submitted to a preoperative cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan and a digital impression by a 3D intraoral scan. Afterwards, the autotrasplanted teeth were planned in a 3D dental implant planning software and transferred to the augmented reality device. Then, a postoperative CBCT scan was performed. Data sets from postoperative CBCT scans were aligned to the planning in the 3D implant planning software to analize the coronal, apical and angular deviations. Student's t-test and Mann-Whitney non-parametric statistical analysis were used to analyze the results.

RESULTS

No statistically significant differences were shown at coronal (p = 0.123) and angular (p = 0.340) level; however, apical deviations between AR and FT study groups (p = 0.008) were statistically significant different.

CONCLUSION

The augmented reality appliance provides higher accuracy in the positioning of single-root autotransplanted teeth compared to the conventional free-hand technique.

The clinical effect of the digital guide in the early implant restoration of second molars

BACKGROUND

In the absence of contraindications to implants, implant repair is the preferred method to treat mandibular second molar loss.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the clinical effects of a traditional implant guide and digital implant guide in the early implant restoration of second molars.

METHODS

The study included 35 patients with second molar loss randomly divided into two groups. Eighteen patients in the experimental group had an implant procedure using a computer-aided design/computer-assisted manufacturing (CAD/CAM) digital implant guide, and 17 patients in the control group had the procedure using a traditional film pressing implantation guide. Then, the surgical procedure was completed using the two different implant guides. At 3 months after surgery, four parameters including screw hole exit position, coronal deviation of the implant site, disease improvement rate, and clinical effects, which included marginal adaptation, anatomic form, marginal discoloration, postoperative sensitivity, surface roughness, and secondary caries of the upper prosthesis were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The screw hole exit position in the experimental group was directed to the functional cusp of the opposite jaw, and there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups. There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of disease improvement and the clinical effect of the upper prosthesis between the two groups. There was no statistically significant difference in the bilateral coronal deviation and deviation direction of implants in the two groups. The bilateral coronal deviation of the experimental group was smaller than that of the control group.

CONCLUSION

The digital implant guide can effectively reduce the deviation of the screw hole and the upper prosthesis in the restoration of the second molar. The prosthesis used in the experimental group had a good clinical outcome, which provides a theoretical basis for the restoration of the posterior molar.

Accuracy of intraoral real-time navigation versus static, CAD/CAM-manufactured pilot drilling guides in dental implant surgery: an in vitro study

Background

Nowadays, 3D planning and static for dynamic aids play an increasing role in oral rehabilitation of the masticatory apparatus with dental implants. The aim of this study is to compare the accuracy of implant placement using a 3D-printed drilling guide and an intraoral real-time dynamic navigation system.

Methods

A total of 60 implants were placed on 12 partially edentulous lower jaw models. 30 were placed with pilot drilling guides, the other half with dynamic navigation (DENACAM^®). In addition, implant placement in interdental gaps and free-end situations were investigated. Accuracy was assessed by cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).

Results

Both systems achieved clinically acceptable results, yet more accurate results regarding the offset of implant base and tip in several spatial dimensions were achieved using drilling guides (each p < 0.05). With regard to angulation, real-time navigation was more precise (p = 0.0016). Its inaccuracy was 3°; the template-guided systems was 4.6°. Median horizontal deviation was 0.52 mm at base and 0.75 mm at tip using DENACAM^®. When using the pilot drill guide, horizontal deviation was 0.34 mm in the median and at the tip by 0.59 mm. Regarding angulation, it was found that the closer the drill hole was to the system's marker, the better navigation performed. The template did not show this trend (p = 0.0043; and p = 0.0022).

Conclusion

Considering the limitations of an in vitro study, dynamic navigation can be used be a tool for reliable and accurate implantation. However, further clinical studies need to follow in order to provide an evidence-based recommendation for use in vivo.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40729-022-00430-6.

Using the Digital Flow to Increase Efficiency in Complex Partial Rehabilitation with Dental Implants

Background

This report presents a clinical case in which the CAD-CAM technology was applied to optimize a complex partial rehabilitation with implant-supported prostheses of a patient with several functional and aesthetic issues. Case presentation. A 40-year-old patient with several complaints due to the absence of multiple teeth and great dissatisfaction regarding his oral health was referred to a Dental College (Curitiba, Brazil). Guided surgery of 11 implants was planned. Digital flow and immediate loading protocol were applied. The patient was followed up for 2 years presenting good clinical and radiographic outcomes.

Conclusions

The digital flow brought agility and precision to implant placement, immediate provisionalization added to satisfaction in the provisional phase, and CAD/CAM technology provided predictability and comfort to deliver the definite restorations.

Accuracy of static digital surgical guides for dental implants based on the guide system: A systematic review

In the present study, we tried to review the current literature, focusing on the effect of different guide systems on the accuracy of the digital surgical guides. A search in PubMed's database, without any date restriction, was performed using keywords based on the PICO question. 54 of the 2378 articles' were chosen for full-text assessment. Articles were screened using predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. 21 articles were included in the qualitative assessment. Descriptive analysis was performed for numeric parameters using mean ± standard deviation. Six types of guide systems were used in the included articles. The commonest guide system was SimPlant (45.64%) followed by NobleGuide (23.00%). The pooled mean angle deviation, global coronal deviation, and global apical deviation were 3.43 mm (95% CI = 2.96, 3.90), 1.16 mm (95% CI = 0.98, 1.24) and 1.35 mm (95% CI = 1.11, 1.59), respectively. The maximum mean(SD) of angle deviation, global coronal deviation, and global apical deviation happened in Stent Cad 4.1(1.86) degrees, NobleGuide 1.86(0.56) mm, and OnDemend3d 1.56(1.48) mm, respectively. Although a final statement could not be made on which system is better, it is certain that the software affects the deviation and could be as important as the implant itself. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The choice of guide systems used for the production of static guide systems which was studied in this article could affect the accuracy of the implant placement procedure.

The implant position accuracy between using only surgical drill guide and surgical drill guide with implant guide in fully digital workflow: a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

To evaluate and compare accuracy in position and inclination of a single-tooth implant placement using tooth-supported surgical drill guide (SDG) and surgical drill guide with implant insertion guide (SDIG) in fully digital workflow.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty partially single edentulous patients were recruited. After randomization, participants were divided into 2 groups equally. The first group underwent implant placement through SDG only, while the second group was subjected to SDIG. All procedure proceeded under a fully digital workflow as the combination of digital scanning from an intraoral scanner, 3D radiographic images from cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), implant planning software, and a 3D manufacturing machine. A post-operative CBCT was performed to compare the deviations (7 parameters) between planned and actual implant positions.

RESULTS

The mean global deviations at the shoulder and apex were 0.74 ± 0.36 and 1.29 ± 0.61 mm, respectively in the SDG group and 0.48 ± 0.22 mm and 0.71 ± 0.31 mm, respectively in the SDIG group. Likewise, the other parameters in the SDIG group showed fewer deviations than SDG for all measurements. Statistically significant differences were indicated by all parameters except for the horizontal deviation at the implant shoulder (p < .05).

CONCLUSION

In single-tooth implant placement with a tooth-supported guide using a computer-assisted (static) system with the SDIG could reduce deviations of actual implant position when compared with using SDG only. Besides, guided implant surgery by fully digital workflow is a practical procedure and provides precise implant position regarding the prosthetic-driven concept.

In Vitro Comparison between Metal Sleeve-Free and Metal Sleeve-Incorporated 3D-Printed Computer-Assisted Implant Surgical Guides

The present study aims to compare the accuracy of metal sleeve-free 3D-printed computer-assisted implant surgical guides (MSF group) (n = 10) with metal sleeve-incorporated 3D-printed computer-assisted implant surgical guides (MSI group) (n = 10). Implants of diameter 4.0 mm and 5.0 mm were placed in the left second premolars and bilateral first molars, respectively, using a fully guided system. Closed-form sleeves were used in teeth on the left and open-form sleeves on the right. The weight differences of the surgical guides before and after implant placement, and angular deviations before and after implant placement were measured. Weight differences were compared with Student's t-tests and angular deviations with Mann-Whitney tests. Cross-sectional views of the insert parts were observed with a scanning electron microscope. Preoperative and postoperative weight differences between the two groups were not statistically significant (p = 0.821). In terms of angular deviations, those along the mesiodistal direction for the left second premolars were significantly lower in the MSF group (p = 0.006). However, those along the mesiodistal direction for the bilateral molars and those along the buccolingual direction for all teeth were not significantly different (p > 0.05). 3D-printed implant surgical guides without metal sleeve inserts enable accurate implant placement without exhausting the guide holes, rendering them feasible for fully guided implant placement.

Full-staged digital and prosthetic guided protocol for the insertion of dental implants in autogenous free bone grafts after reconstruction of segmental mandibular defects

PURPOSE

This study aims to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of dental implants, inserted in consolidated free bone grafts; postsegmental mandibular resection, after following a fully guided staged protocol, which established a systematic approach that correlates the grafted bone and the enclosed implants to the undisturbed mandibular segments and the maxillary occlusal plane.

METHODS

Seven patients were enrolled in the study; all were diagnosed for mandibular locally aggressive tumors. All of the patients were subjected to computer-guided segmental mandibular resections, secondary free iliac crest bone graft; aided by computer-guided harvest and prosthetic guidance of the graft positioning and fixation. Finally, the guided bone grafts; after being consolidated, received twenty-nine computer-guided dental implants.

RESULTS

By the end of the period of osseointegration, the predetermined criteria of implant success judged the success of twenty-five implants, versus the failure of four implants, with (86.2%) percentage of success.

CONCLUSION

The clinical and radiographic assessments demonstrated sound base bone grafts, which succeeded not only to restore the native mandibular continuity and configuration but also to direct the fair-sized embedded dental implants into favorable coastal locations and axial projections, which influenced a smooth prosthetic rehabilitation.

Advantages and limitations of implant surgery with CAD/CAM surgical guides: A literature review

Background

The purpose of this study is to review the available literature associated with implant surgery using computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) surgical guides and discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this advanced technique.

Material and Methods

An electronic literature search was conducted in the PubMed database for the relevant information on implant placement with CAD/CAM surgical guides. This review was constructed following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Articles were limited to those published within the past 10 years and in the English language. Only clinical studies were included. Inclusion criteria were: studies including 10 implants or more and studies presenting angular deviations in degrees and linear deviations in millimeter. Observational studies, reviews, animal studies, in vitro studies, case reports, simulation studies were excluded. Nine articles were included for qualitative synthesis.

Results

The initial search detected 61 articles, and after screening abstracts, a total of 15 articles were selected for full-text review. After the full-text analysis of the 15 articles, six articles were excluded as they did not meet inclusion criteria for study design, study population, and implant placement with data presentation for angular and linear deviations. Ultimately, nine articles providing angular and linear deviations between planned and actual placed implants were used in this review. Common problems that may be encountered by clinicians were listed, and recommendations were made on how to avoid those problems.

Conclusions

It has been suggested that although unrealistic expectations are often associated with implant placement with CAD/CAM surgical guides, there is no impeccable accuracy in the clinic. This review demonstrated that the practitioners should be aware of the angular and linear deviations up to 5 ° and 2.3 mm. Therefore, inexperienced dentists should obtain adequate training and be familiar with the basic steps with CAD/CAM surgical guides to avoid complications.

Key words:CAD/CAM, CBCT, implant, stereolithography, surgical guide.

Use of a surgical template for minimally invasive second-stage surgery: A dental technique

The introduction of new techniques and new technology has been directly related to successful outcomes in implant dentistry. Merging information from high-quality cone beam computed tomography images and detailed prosthetically driven digital planning translates into computer-guided surgery. A surgical template is a guide used to assist in the proper surgical placement and angulation of dental implants. However, a surgical guide not only facilitates implant placement but can also be used for other purposes, including diagnosis, treatment planning, and even second-stage surgery. In situations where multiple implants have been placed through computer-guided implant surgery, the preexisting surgical template can be used to perform the second-stage surgery with a flapless approach if the patient's soft tissue condition permits.

In-office fabrication of dental implant surgical guides using desktop stereolithographic printing and implant treatment planning software: A clinical report

Guided surgery is accepted as the most accurate way to place an implant and predictably relate the implant to its definitive prosthesis, although few clinicians use it. However, recent developments in high-quality desktop 3-dimensional stereolithographic printers have led to the in-office fabrication of stereolithographic surgical guides at reduced cost. This clinical report demonstrates a protocol for using a cost-effective, in-office rapid prototyping technique to fabricate a surgical guide for dental implant placement.

Removal of Supernumerary Teeth Utilizing a Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Aided Manufacturing Surgical Guide

Supernumerary teeth need to be removed because they can cause various complications. Caution is needed because their removal can cause damage to permanent teeth or tooth germs in the local vicinity. Surgical guides have recently been used in maxillofacial surgery. Because surgical guides are designed through preoperative analysis by computer-aided design software and fabricated using a 3-dimensional printer applying computer-aided manufacturing technology, they increase the accuracy and predictability of surgery. This report describes 2 cases of removal of a mesiodens-1 from a child and 1 from an adolescent-using a surgical guide; these would have been difficult to remove with conventional surgical methods.

Precise implant placement with a computer-assisted surgical guide in cleft lip and palate patients

It is very common for cleft lip and palate patients to have congenitally missing teeth. Insufficient buccopalatal bone volume, a shallow vestibule, and lack of soft tissue resulting from previous surgical scarring render it difficult for clinicians to place implants in the missing area. This report describes guide surgery that represents a treatment option for cases in which implants need to be placed in tight spaces with minimal bone space, to minimize as far as possible manual placement errors.

Assessment of the OsteoMark-Navigation System for Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

PURPOSE

To assess the accuracy of a novel navigation system for maxillofacial surgery using human cadavers and a live minipig model.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We tested an electromagnetic tracking system (OsteoMark-Navigation) that uses simple sensors to determine the position and orientation of a hand-held pencil-like marking device. The device can translate 3-dimensional computed tomographic data intraoperatively to allow the surgeon to localize and draw a proposed osteotomy or the resection margins of a tumor on bone. The accuracy of the OsteoMark-Navigation system in locating and marking osteotomies and screw positions in human cadaver heads was assessed. In group 1 (n = 3, 6 sides), OsteoMark-Navigation marked osteotomies and screw positions were compared to virtual treatment plans. In group 2 (n = 3, 6 sides), marked osteotomies and screw positions for distraction osteogenesis devices were compared with those performed using fabricated guide stents. Three metrics were used to document the precision and accuracy. In group 3 (n = 1), the system was tested in a standard operating room environment.

RESULTS

For group 1, the mean error between the points was 0.7 mm (horizontal) and 1.7 mm (vertical). Compared with the posterior and inferior mandibular border, the mean error was 1.2 and 1.7 mm, respectively. For group 2, the mean discrepancy between the points marked using the OsteoMark-Navigation system and the surgical guides was 1.9 mm (range 0 to 4.1). The system maintained accuracy on a live minipig in a standard operating room environment.

CONCLUSION

Based on this research OsteoMark-Navigation is a potentially powerful tool for clinical use in maxillofacial surgery. It has accuracy and precision comparable to that of existing clinical applications.

Dental implant placement after mandibular reconstruction by microvascular free fibula flap: current knowledge and remaining questions

Mandibular reconstruction by microvascular free fibula flap has dramatically improved the quality of life of patients treated by interruptive surgery. A simple prosthesis can be used for dental rehabilitation but in many cases, these prostheses remain nonfunctional. The use of osseointegrated implants restores both function and aesthetics. The technique for implantation in fibula flap is very similar to the technique in native mandible but access to the bone is the most difficult step of the surgery. The success rate for osteointegration ranges from 86% to 99% but the success rate of the prosthesis is much lower. This difference could be explained by the vertical discrepancy between the graft and the remaining mandible, which leads to an unfavourable implant-crown ratio. The quality of soft tissues is also a limiting factor for the prosthesis, and hypertrophy often appears after the placement of the abutments. The type of the prosthesis (fixed or removable) should also be discussed. Occlusal considerations should be highlighted as occlusion remains abnormal in many cases. Three-dimensional imaging might help in the planning of these complex reconstructions. A close collaboration between the maxillo-facial surgeon, the oral surgeon and the prosthodontist is necessary to obtain good results.