The promise of the BRAIN initiative: NIH strategies for understanding neural circuit function

Unsupervised classification of brain-wide axons reveals the presubiculum neuronal projection blueprint

We present a quantitative strategy to identify all projection neuron types from a given region with statistically different patterns of anatomical targeting. We first validate the technique with mouse primary motor cortex layer 6 data, yielding two clusters consistent with cortico-thalamic and intra-telencephalic neurons. We next analyze the presubiculum, a less-explored region, identifying five classes of projecting neurons with unique patterns of divergence, convergence, and specificity. We report several findings: individual classes target multiple subregions along defined functions; all hypothalamic regions are exclusively targeted by the same class also invading midbrain and agranular retrosplenial cortex; Cornu Ammonis receives input from a single class of presubicular axons also projecting to granular retrosplenial cortex; path distances from the presubiculum to the same targets differ significantly between classes, as do the path distances to distinct targets within most classes; the identified classes have highly non-uniform abundances; and presubicular somata are topographically segregated among classes. This study thus demonstrates that statistically distinct projections shed light on the functional organization of their circuit.

Bioelectronic Medicine: a multidisciplinary roadmap from biophysics to precision therapies

Bioelectronic Medicine stands as an emerging field that rapidly evolves and offers distinctive clinical benefits, alongside unique challenges. It consists of the modulation of the nervous system by precise delivery of electrical current for the treatment of clinical conditions, such as post-stroke movement recovery or drug-resistant disorders. The unquestionable clinical impact of Bioelectronic Medicine is underscored by the successful translation to humans in the last decades, and the long list of preclinical studies. Given the emergency of accelerating the progress in new neuromodulation treatments (i.e., drug-resistant hypertension, autoimmune and degenerative diseases), collaboration between multiple fields is imperative. This work intends to foster multidisciplinary work and bring together different fields to provide the fundamental basis underlying Bioelectronic Medicine. In this review we will go from the biophysics of the cell membrane, which we consider the inner core of neuromodulation, to patient care. We will discuss the recently discovered mechanism of neurotransmission switching and how it will impact neuromodulation design, and we will provide an update on neuronal and glial basis in health and disease. The advances in biomedical technology have facilitated the collection of large amounts of data, thereby introducing new challenges in data analysis. We will discuss the current approaches and challenges in high throughput data analysis, encompassing big data, networks, artificial intelligence, and internet of things. Emphasis will be placed on understanding the electrochemical properties of neural interfaces, along with the integration of biocompatible and reliable materials and compliance with biomedical regulations for translational applications. Preclinical validation is foundational to the translational process, and we will discuss the critical aspects of such animal studies. Finally, we will focus on the patient point-of-care and challenges in neuromodulation as the ultimate goal of bioelectronic medicine. This review is a call to scientists from different fields to work together with a common endeavor: accelerate the decoding and modulation of the nervous system in a new era of therapeutic possibilities.

Multiscale model of primary motor cortex circuits predicts in vivo cell-type-specific, behavioral state-dependent dynamics

Understanding cortical function requires studying multiple scales: molecular, cellular, circuit, and behavioral. We develop a multiscale, biophysically detailed model of mouse primary motor cortex (M1) with over 10,000 neurons and 30 million synapses. Neuron types, densities, spatial distributions, morphologies, biophysics, connectivity, and dendritic synapse locations are constrained by experimental data. The model includes long-range inputs from seven thalamic and cortical regions and noradrenergic inputs. Connectivity depends on cell class and cortical depth at sublaminar resolution. The model accurately predicts in vivo layer- and cell-type-specific responses (firing rates and LFP) associated with behavioral states (quiet wakefulness and movement) and experimental manipulations (noradrenaline receptor blockade and thalamus inactivation). We generate mechanistic hypotheses underlying the observed activity and analyzed low-dimensional population latent dynamics. This quantitative theoretical framework can be used to integrate and interpret M1 experimental data and sheds light on the cell-type-specific multiscale dynamics associated with several experimental conditions and behaviors.

Italian, European, and international neuroinformatics efforts: An overview

Neuroinformatics is a research field that focusses on software tools capable of identifying, analysing, modelling, organising and sharing multiscale neuroscience data. Neuroinformatics has exploded in the last two decades with the emergence of the Big Data phenomenon, characterised by the so-called 3Vs (volume, velocity and variety), which provided neuroscientists with an improved ability to acquire and process data faster and more cheaply thanks to technical improvements in clinical, genomic and radiological technologies. This situation has led to a 'data deluge', as neuroscientists can routinely collect more study data in a few days than they could in a year just a decade ago. To address this phenomenon, several neuroimaging-focussed neuroinformatics platforms have emerged, funded by national or transnational agencies, with the following goals: (i) development of tools for archiving and organising analytical data (XNAT, REDCap and LabKey); (ii) development of data-driven models evolving from reductionist approaches to multidimensional models (RIN, IVN, HBD, EuroPOND, E-DADS and GAAIN BRAIN); and (iii) development of e-infrastructures to provide sufficient computational power and storage resources (neuGRID, HBP-EBRAINS, LONI and CONP). Although the scenario is still fragmented, there are technological and economical attempts at both national and international levels to introduce high standards for open and Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable (FAIR) neuroscience worldwide.

Proceedings of the Second Curing Coma Campaign NIH Symposium: Challenging the Future of Research for Coma and Disorders of Consciousness

This proceedings article presents actionable research targets on the basis of the presentations and discussions at the 2nd Curing Coma National Institutes of Health (NIH) symposium held from May 3 to May 5, 2021. Here, we summarize the background, research priorities, panel discussions, and deliverables discussed during the symposium across six major domains related to disorders of consciousness. The six domains include (1) Biology of Coma, (2) Coma Database, (3) Neuroprognostication, (4) Care of Comatose Patients, (5) Early Clinical Trials, and (6) Long-term Recovery. Following the 1st Curing Coma NIH virtual symposium held on September 9 to September 10, 2020, six workgroups, each consisting of field experts in respective domains, were formed and tasked with identifying gaps and developing key priorities and deliverables to advance the mission of the Curing Coma Campaign. The highly interactive and inspiring presentations and panel discussions during the 3-day virtual NIH symposium identified several action items for the Curing Coma Campaign mission, which we summarize in this article.

Brain circuits for pain and its treatment

[Figure: see text].

Improved neuropathological identification of traumatic brain injury through quantitative neuroimaging and neural network analyses: Some practical approaches for the neurorehabilitation clinician

BACKGROUND

Quantitative neuroimaging analyses have the potential to provide additional information about the neuropathology of traumatic brain injury (TBI) that more thoroughly informs the neurorehabilitation clinician.

OBJECTIVE

Quantitative neuroimaging is typically not covered in the standard radiological report, but often can be extracted via post-processing of clinical neuroimaging studies, provided that the proper volume acquisition sequences were originally obtained.

METHODS

Research and commercially available quantitative neuroimaging methods provide region of interest (ROI) quantification metrics, lesion burden volumetrics and cortical thickness measures, degree of focal encephalomalacia, white matter (WM) abnormalities and residual hemorrhagic pathology. If present, diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) provides a variety of techniques that aid in evaluating WM integrity. Using quantitatively identified structural and ROI neuropathological changes are most informative when done from a neural network approach.

RESULTS

Viewing quantitatively identifiable damage from a neural network perspective provides the neurorehabilitation clinician with an additional tool for linking brain pathology to understand symptoms, problems and deficits as well as aid neuropsychological test interpretation. All of these analyses can be displayed in graphic form, including3-D image analysis. A case study approach is used to demonstrate the utility of quantitative neuroimaging and network analyses in TBI.

CONCLUSIONS

Quantitative neuroimaging may provide additional useful information for the neurorehabilitation clinician.