Effect of a combination of ethinylestradiol 30 microg and drospirenone 3 mg on tolerance, cycle control, general well-being and fluid-related symptoms in women with premenstrual disorders requesting contraception

Oral contraceptives containing drospirenone for premenstrual syndrome

BACKGROUND

Premenstrual syndrome (PMS) is a common problem. Premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD) is a severe form of premenstrual syndrome. Combined oral contraceptives (COC), which provide both progestin and oestrogen, have been examined for their ability to relieve premenstrual symptoms. A combined oral contraceptive containing drospirenone and a low oestrogen dose has been approved for treating PMDD in women who choose combined oral contraceptives for contraception.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of COCs containing drospirenone in women with PMS.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group trial register, CENTRAL (now containing output from two trials registers and CINAHL), MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, LILACS, Google Scholar, and Epistemonikos on 29 June 2022. We checked included studies' reference lists and contacted study authors and experts in the field to identify additional studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCT) that compared COCs containing drospirenone with placebo or with another COC for treatment of women with PMS.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures recommended by Cochrane. The primary review outcomes were effects on premenstrual symptoms that were prospectively recorded, and withdrawal due to adverse events. Secondary outcomes included effects on mood, adverse events, and response rate to study medications.

MAIN RESULTS

We included five RCTs (858 women analysed, most diagnosed with PMDD). The evidence was very low to moderate quality; the main limitations were serious risk of bias due to poor reporting of study methods, and serious inconsistency and imprecision. COCs containing drospirenone and ethinylestradiol (EE) versus placebo COCs containing drospirenone and EE may improve overall premenstrual symptoms (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.41, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.59 to -0.24; 2 RCTs, N = 514; I2 = 64%; low-quality evidence); and functional impairment due to premenstrual symptoms in terms of productivity (mean difference (MD) -0.31, 95% CI -0.55 to -0.08; 2 RCTs, N = 432; I2 = 47%; low-quality evidence), social activities (MD -0.29, 95% CI -0.54 to -0.04; 2 RCTs, N = 432; I2 = 53%; low-quality evidence), and relationships (MD -0.30, 95% CI -0.54 to -0.06; 2 RCTs, N = 432; I2 = 45%; low-quality evidence). The effects from COCs containing drospirenone may be small to moderate. COCs containing drospirenone and EE may increase withdrawal from trials due to adverse effects (odds ratio (OR) 3.41, 95% CI 2.01 to 5.78; 4 RCT, N = 776; I2 = 0%; low-quality evidence). This suggests that if you assume the risk of withdrawal due to adverse effects from placebo is 3%, the risk from drospirenone plus EE will be between 6% and 16%. We are uncertain of the effect of drospirenone plus EE on premenstrual mood symptoms, when measured by validated tools that were not developed to assess premenstrual symptoms. COCs containing drospirenone may lead to more adverse effects in total (OR 2.31, 95% CI 1.71 to 3.11; 3 RCT, N = 739; I2 = 0%; low-quality evidence). This suggests that if you assume the risk of having adverse effects from placebo is 28%, the risk from drospirenone plus EE will be between 40% and 54%. It probably leads to more breast pain, and may lead to more nausea, intermenstrual bleeding, and menstrual disorder. Its effect on nervousness, headache, asthenia, and pain is uncertain. There was no report of any rare but serious adverse effects, such as venous thromboembolism in any of the included studies. COCs containing drospirenone may improve response rate (OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.13 to 2.40; 1 RCT, N = 449; I2 not applicable; low-quality evidence). This suggests that if you assume the response rate from placebo is 36%, the risk from drospirenone plus EE will be between 39% and 58%. We did not identify any studies that compared COCs containing drospirenone with other COCs.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

COCs containing drospirenone and EE may improve premenstrual symptoms that result in functional impairments in women with PMDD. The placebo also had a significant effect. COCs containing drospirenone and EE may lead to more adverse effects compared to placebo. We do not know whether it works after three cycles, helps women with less severe symptoms, or is better than other combined oral contraceptives that contain a different progestogen.

Health Status Is Affected, and Phase I/II Biotransformation Activity Altered in Young Women Using Oral Contraceptives Containing Drospirenone/Ethinyl Estradiol

Combined oral contraceptive (COC) use has been associated with various adverse effects. Formulations containing drospirenone (DRSP) and ethinyl estradiol (EE) are generally regarded as milder COCs. Whether long term use of these pills indeed has a low health risk remains questionable. COC use may affect the biotransformation balance by increasing the toxic load or by interfering with the pharmacokinetics of other drugs. This may negatively impact overall health via the production of toxic biotransformation metabolites and induction of oxidative stress. Although individual enzymes involved in biotransformation are known to be regulated by COCs, the effect of COC use on the overall liver biotransformation efficiency has not been reported. Here, we evaluated the general subjective health status and overall liver biotransformation efficiency of healthy young women who were either long term chronic users of COCs containing DRSP/EE, or who were not using any hormonal products. COC users suffered from moderate to severe fatigue and reported more health-related symptoms. Furthermore, phase I (CYP1A2) activity was reduced whereas phase II conjugation reactions (glucuronide conjugation and glycine conjugation) were increased in COC users. Finally, serum peroxide levels were markedly elevated and antioxidant capacity of plasma was reduced in COC users. COCs containing DRSP/EE may, therefore, adversely affect health status and disturb the balance between phase I and II biotransformation reactions. These effects may be mediated by oxidative stress.

Association between oral contraceptive use and incident heart failure

Aims

Oral contraceptives (OCs) are widely used in women of reproductive age, but their influences on heart failure (HF) development have yet to be reported. This study was performed to assess HF risk associated with OC use.

Methods and results

We studied women participating in the Multi‐Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis with available data on OC use. Inverse probability of treatment weighting analyses were used to reduce baseline imbalances. Cox proportional hazards models were applied to evaluate the associations of OC use and HF risk. The primary analysis comprised a total of 3594 participants [average age 62.10 (10.24) years]. During an average follow‐up of 12.45 (3.75) years, 138 incident HF occurred. In unadjusted Cox model, OC use was associated with a decreased risk of HF [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.45, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.31–0.64, P < 0.001]. However, in multivariable‐adjusted and inverse probability of treatment weighting models, the results were attenuated and became non‐significant (HR = 0.96, 95% CI 0.63–1.48, P = 0.86 and HR = 0.79, 95% CI 0.45–1.40, P = 0.43, respectively). Duration of OC use was not related to increased risks of HF. When stratifying HF into subtypes, similar associations were observed. In multivariable–adjusted regression models, OC use was positively associated with left ventricular end‐diastolic mass [coefficient (β) = 3.04, P = 0.006] and stroke volume (β = 1.76, P = 0.01 for the left ventricle; β = 2.17, P = 0.005 for the right ventricle) but had no impact on left ventricular ejection fraction (β = 0.09, P = 0.75) and right ventricular ejection fraction (β = 0.33, P = 0.25).

Conclusions

Oral contraceptive use in women of reproductive age does not portend increased risk of HF. However, whether the formulations or dosages differently impact this association should be further investigated.

Comparison of change in body weight between contraception containing 30-μg ethinylestradiol/2-mg chlormadinone acetate or 30-μg ethinylestradiol/3-mg drospirenone: a randomised controlled trial

Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare changes in body weight in women using a combined oral contraceptive (COC) consisting of 30-μg ethinylestradiol (EE) and 2-mg chlormadinone acetate (CMA) or a COC consisting of 30-μg EE and 3-mg drospirenone (DRSP).Methods: This randomised double-blind controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01608698) was conducted at a university hospital-based clinic in Thailand between June 2012 and September 2015. A total of 102 women were enrolled in the study, 99 of whom were randomised to EE/CMA (n = 45) or EE/DRSP (n = 54). Each participant was treated for six cycles. Body weight and other parameters as well as side effects were recorded at baseline and at the end of the third and sixth cycles of treatment.Results: A significant difference was observed in mean body weight change between the EE/CMA and EE/DRSP groups from both baseline to third cycle (0.51 ± 1.36 kg vs -0.43 ± 1.56 kg; p = .003) and baseline to sixth cycle (1.00 ± 1.84 kg vs -0.20 ± 2.23 kg; p = .013). The mean difference in body mass index and waist circumference had a similar trend to that of the mean difference in body weight. There was no significant difference in side effects between groups.Conclusion: A COC containing 30-µg EE/3-mg DRSP tended to confer a significantly more favourable change in body weight over a 6-month period compared with a COC containing 30-µg EE/2-mg CMA, which was associated with an increase in body weight.

Combined oral contraceptive synergistically activates mineralocorticoid receptor through histone code modifications

Clinical studies have shown that the use of combined oral contraceptive in pre-menopausal women is associated with fluid retention. However, the molecular mechanism is still elusive. We hypothesized that combined oral contraceptive (COC) ethinyl estradiol (EE) and norgestrel (N) synergistically activates mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) through histone code modifications. Twelve-week-old female Sprague-Dawley rats were treated with olive oil (control), a combination of 0.1µg EE and 1.0µg N (low COC) or 1.0µg EE and 10.0µg N (high COC) as well as 0.1 or 1.0µg EE and 1.0 or 10.0µg N daily for 6 weeks. Expression of MR target genes in kidney cortex was determined by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. MR was quantified by western blot. Recruitment of MR and RNA polymerase II (Pol II) on promoters of target genes as well as histone code modifications was analyzed by chromatin immunoprecipitation assay. Treatment with COC increased renal cortical expression of MR target genes such as serum and glucocorticoid-regulated kinase 1 (Sgk-1), glucocorticoid-induced leucine zipper (Gilz), epithelial Na(+)channel (Enac) and Na(+)-K(+)-ATPase subunit α1 (Atp1a1). Although COC increased neither serum aldosterone nor MR expression in kidney cortex, it increased recruitment of MR and Pol II in parallel with increased H3Ac and H3K4me3 on the promoter regions of MR target genes. However, treatment with EE or N alone did not affect renal cortical expression of Sgk-1, Gilz, Enac or Atp1a1. These results indicate that COC synergistically activates MR through histone code modifications.

Suppression of ovarian activity with a low-dose 21/7-day regimen oral contraceptive containing ethinylestradiol 20 mcg/drospirenone 3 mg in Japanese and Caucasian women

BACKGROUND

Two studies assessed the effect of a low-estrogen-dose 21/7-day oral contraceptive containing ethinylestradiol and drospirenone (EE 20 mcg/drsp 3 mg) on ovarian activity in Japanese and Caucasian women.

STUDY DESIGN

Study 1 was conducted in Japanese women (20-35 years), and Study 2 was conducted in Caucasian women (18-35 years). All women received EE 20 mcg/drsp 3 mg in a 21-day active pill regimen. The primary endpoint was the proportion of women with ovulation inhibition (Hoogland score <6; as assessed by transvaginal ultrasonography) during treatment cycle 2.

RESULTS

Japanese (n=23) and Caucasian (n=30) women received two cycles of study treatment. During treatment cycle 2, ovulation was inhibited in 100% and 92.9% of Japanese and Caucasian women, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

EE 20 mcg/drsp 3 mg in a 21/7-day regimen provides comparable ovarian suppression in Japanese and Caucasian women, with normal ovarian function resuming shortly after treatment end in both populations.

Oral contraceptives containing drospirenone for premenstrual syndrome

BACKGROUND

Premenstrual syndrome (PMS) is a common problem. Premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD) is a severe form of premenstrual syndrome. Combined oral contraceptives, which provide both progestin and estrogen, have been examined for their ability to relieve premenstrual symptoms. An oral contraceptive containing drospirenone and a low estrogen dose has been approved for treating PMDD in women who choose oral contraceptives for contraception.

OBJECTIVES

To review all randomized controlled trials comparing a combined oral contraceptive containing drospirenone to a placebo or another combined oral contraceptive for effect on premenstrual symptoms.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched for studies of drospirenone and premenstrual syndrome in the following databases: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE, and POPLINE (20 Dec 2011); EMBASE, LILACS, PsycINFO, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) of the World Health Organization (02 Mar 2011). We also examined references lists of relevant articles and wrote to known investigators to find other trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials in any language that compared a combined oral contraceptive (COC) containing drospirenone with a placebo or with another COC for effect on premenstrual symptoms. The primary outcome included affective and physical premenstrual symptoms that were prospectively recorded. Adverse events related to combined oral contraceptive use were examined.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed study quality. For continuous variables, the mean difference (MD) was computed with 95% confidence interval (CI). For dichotomous outcomes, the Peto odds ratio (OR) with 95% CI was calculated.

MAIN RESULTS

We included five trials with a total of 1920 women. Two placebo-controlled trials of women with PMDD showed less severe premenstrual symptoms after three months with drospirenone 3 mg plus ethinyl estradiol 20 μg than with placebo (MD -7.92; 95% CI -11.16 to -4.67). The drospirenone group had greater mean decreases in impairment of productivity (MD -0.31; 95% CI -0.55 to -0.08), social activities (MD -0.29; 95% CI -0.54 to -0.04), and relationships (MD -0.30; 95% CI -0.54 to -0.06). Side effects more common with the use of the drospirenone COC contraceptive were nausea, intermenstrual bleeding, and breast pain. The respective odds ratios were 3.15 (95% CI 1.90 to 5.22), 4.92 (95% CI 3.03 to 7.96), and 2.67 (95% CI 1.50 to 4.78). Total adverse events related to the study drug were more likely for the drospirenone COC group (OR 2.36; 95% CI 1.62 to 3.44). Three trials studied the effect of drospirenone 3 mg plus ethinyl estradiol 30 μg on less severe symptoms. A placebo-controlled six-month trial had insufficient data for primary outcome analysis. Another six-month study used levonorgestrel 150 µg plus ethinyl estradiol 30 µg for the comparison group but did not provide enough data on premenstrual symptoms. In a two-year trial, the drospirenone COC group had similar premenstrual symptoms to the comparison group given desogestrel 150 µg plus ethinyl estradiol 30 µg (OR 0.87; 95% CI 0.63 to 1.22). The groups were also similar for adverse events related to treatment (OR 1.02; 95% CI 0.78 to 1.33).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Drospirenone 3 mg plus ethinyl estradiol 20 μg may help treat premenstrual symptoms in women with severe symptoms, that is, premenstrual dysphoric disorder. The placebo also had a large effect. We do not know whether the combined oral contraceptive works after three cycles, helps women with less severe symptoms, or is better than other oral contraceptives. Larger and longer trials of higher quality are needed to address these issues. Trials should follow CONSORT guidelines.

Safety, efficacy, actions, and patient acceptability of drospirenone/ethinyl estradiol contraceptive pills in the treatment of premenstrual dysphoric disorder

Premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD) is estimated to affect 3%–8% of reproductive age women. Multiple therapeutic modalities have been evaluated with varying efficacy for the associated somatic and mood symptoms. The majority of older studies had shown that oral contraceptive pills (OCs) were most effective for the physical symptoms. However, newer OCs containing a novel progestin, drospirenone, have shown promise in alleviating both the somatic and affective/behavioral symptoms. This progestin, which is a derivative of spironolactone, has both antimineralocorticoid and antiandrogenic activity. A 24/4 formulation containing 20 μg of ethinyl estradiol has been found effective in randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trials utilizing established scales documenting symptoms associated with PMDD. Multiple studies have shown that drospirenone-containing OCs are safe without evidence of clinically adverse effects on carbohydrate metabolism, lipids, blood pressure, weight, serum potassium or increased thrombotic events compared to other low dose OCs. In addition, significant improvements have been demonstrated in acne, hirsutism, and fluid retention symptoms. Several open label studies demonstrated good patient compliance and reported satisfaction with the method. Because of the significant placebo effect demonstrated in the blinded placebo-controlled trials, additional large randomized placebo-controlled trials are needed to confirm the efficacy of the drospirenone OCs in the treatment of PMDD. However, this OC formulation appears to be a promising therapeutic modality.

Oral contraceptives containing drospirenone for premenstrual syndrome

BACKGROUND

Premenstrual syndrome (PMS) is a common problem. Premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD) is a severe form of PMS. Combined oral contraceptives (COCs), which have both progestin and estrogen, have been examined for their ability to relieve premenstrual symptoms. A COC containing drospirenone and low estrogen has been approved for treating PMDD in women who choose COCs for contraception.

OBJECTIVES

To review all randomized controlled trials comparing combined oral contraceptives containing drospirenone versus a placebo or another COC for effect on premenstrual symptoms.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the computerized databases MEDLINE, POPLINE, CENTRAL, EMBASE, LILACS, PsycINFO, and CINAHL for studies of drospirenone and premenstrual syndrome. We also examined references lists of relevant articles, and wrote to known investigators to find other trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials in any language that compared a COC containing drospirenone versus a placebo or another COC for effect on premenstrual symptoms. Primary outcome was the prospective recording of premenstrual symptoms (affective and physical). Adverse events related to COC use were examined.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently abstracted data and assessed study quality.

MAIN RESULTS

We included five trials with a total of 1600 women. Two placebo-controlled trials of women with PMDD showed less severe premenstrual symptoms after three months with drospirenone (plus ethinyl estradiol (EE) 20g) than with the placebo (WMD -7.83; 95% CI -10.91 to -4.75). The drospirenone group had greater decreases in impairment of productivity (WMD -0.42; 95% CI -0.64 to -0.20), social activities (WMD -0.39; 95% CI -0.62 to -0.15), and relationships (WMD -0.38; 95% CI -0.61 to -0.51). Side effects more common with COC use were nausea, intermenstrual bleeding, and breast pain. Little effect was found on less severe symptoms when comparing drospirenone plus more estrogen to another COC. A six-month study showed fewer symptoms with drospirenone, while a two-year trial found the groups to be similar.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Drospirenone plus EE 20 mug may help treat premenstrual symptoms in women with PMDD. The placebo also had a large effect. We do not know whether the COC works after three cycles, for women with less severe symptoms, or better than other COCs. Larger and longer trials of higher quality are needed to address these issues. Trials should follow CONSORT reporting guidelines.

Efficacy and safety of a low-dose combined oral contraceptive containing drospirenone 3 mg and ethinylestradiol 20 mcg in a 24/4-day regimen

OBJECTIVE

The study was conducted to assess the efficacy of a low-dose combined oral contraceptive (COC) containing drospirenone (drsp) 3 mg/ethinylestradiol (EE) 20 mcg administered for 24 days of active treatment followed by a 4-day hormone-free interval (24/4 regimen).

STUDY DESIGN

In this open-label uncontrolled study conducted in 50 European centers, healthy females aged 18-35 years with a body mass index of less than 30 kg/m(2) received drsp 3 mg/EE 20 mcg 24/4 over 13 cycles. The primary efficacy variable was the number of unintended pregnancies.

RESULTS

Five pregnancies occurred among 1101 women over 13,248 treatment cycles, resulting in a Pearl Index (PI) of 0.49 with an upper two-sided 95% CI limit of 1.14. Of these pregnancies, three were attributed to noncompliance with tablet use resulting in an adjusted PI for 'perfect use' of 0.22 (upper limit of two-sided 95% CI: 0.80) based on 11,755 cycles.

CONCLUSION

Drospirenone 3 mg/EE 20 mcg 24/4 is a highly effective COC in nonobese women.

Bleeding pattern, tolerance and patient satisfaction with a drospirenone-containing oral contraceptive evaluated in 3488 women in Europe, the Middle East and Canada

BACKGROUND

This study was conducted to assess the bleeding pattern, tolerance and patient satisfaction associated with an oral contraceptive (OC) containing 3 mg of drospirenone and 30 mcg of ethinyl estradiol under real-life conditions.

STUDY DESIGN

A multicenter, prospective and observational six-cycle study was conducted in 12 countries in Europe, the Middle East and Canada. The efficacy variables included an assessment of bleeding patterns, premenstrual symptoms of water retention and patient satisfaction as determined by a visual analog scale.

RESULTS

A total of 3488 women was enrolled in the study. The percentage of women with intermenstrual bleeding decreased from 27.9% at baseline to 5.4% at the end of Cycle 6, while dysmenorrhea decreased from 67% to 17.7%. Also, amenorrhea decreased from 21.3% to 7.5%. The decreases in all three parameters were statistically significant (p<.0001). Approximately 70% of the women reported abdominal bloating and/or breast tenderness at baseline and less than 38% did so at the end of Cycle 6 (p<.0001). Patient satisfaction increased for all investigated items. Upon completion of the study, 86.2% of the women answered "yes" to continuing treatment with this OC.

CONCLUSION

The OC containing 3 mg of drospirenone and 30 mcg of ethinyl estradiol has beneficial effects on bleeding pattern, symptoms of water retention and patient satisfaction.

Estrogen and progestogen therapy in postmenopausal women

This Educational Bulletin discusses the effectiveness of hormone therapy (HT) for relieving vasomotor and urogenital symptoms and the side effects associated with such treatment; considers the evidence concerning the effects of HT on the risk of osteoporosis and related fractures and on the risks of coronary artery disease, dementia, and colorectal cancer; and considers the longer term effects of HT on the risks of stroke, venous thromboembolism, and cancer of the breast, endometrium, and ovary.

Oral contraceptives containing drospirenone for premenstrual syndrome

BACKGROUND

Premenstrual syndrome (PMS) is a common problem. Premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD) is a severe form of PMS. Combined oral contraceptives (COCs), which have both progestin and estrogen, have been examined for their ability to relieve premenstrual symptoms. A COC containing drospirenone and low estrogen has been approved for treating PMDD in women who choose COCs for contraception.

OBJECTIVES

To review all randomized controlled trials comparing combined oral contraceptives containing drospirenone versus a placebo or another COC for effect on premenstrual symptoms.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the computerized databases MEDLINE, POPLINE, CENTRAL, EMBASE, LILACS, PsycINFO, and CINAHL for studies of drospirenone and premenstrual syndrome. We also examined references lists of relevant articles, and wrote to known investigators to find other trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials in any language that compared a COC containing drospirenone versus a placebo or another COC for effect on premenstrual symptoms. Primary outcome was the prospective recording of premenstrual symptoms (affective and physical). Adverse events related to COC use were examined.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently abstracted data and assessed study quality.

MAIN RESULTS

We included five trials with a total of 1600 women. Two placebo-controlled trials of women with PMDD showed less severe premenstrual symptoms after three months with drospirenone (plus ethinyl estradiol (EE) 20g) than with the placebo (WMD -7.83; 95% CI -10.91 to -4.75). The drospirenone group had greater decreases in impairment of productivity (WMD -0.42; 95% CI -0.64 to -0.20), social activities (WMD -0.39; 95% CI -0.62 to -0.15), and relationships (WMD -0.38; 95% CI -0.61 to -0.51). Side effects more common with COC use were nausea, intermenstrual bleeding, and breast pain. Little effect was found on less severe symptoms when comparing drospirenone plus more estrogen to another COC. A six-month study showed fewer symptoms with drospirenone, while a two-year trial found the groups to be similar.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Drospirenone plus EE 20 mug may help treat premenstrual symptoms in women with PMDD. The placebo also had a large effect. We do not know whether the COC works after three cycles, for women with less severe symptoms, or better than other COCs. Larger and longer trials of higher quality are needed to address these issues. Trials should follow CONSORT reporting guidelines.