Factors associated with nonadherence to instructions for using the Nestorone®/ethinyl estradiol contraceptive vaginal ring

Preference, adherence, and acceptability of 3 nonmedicated intravaginal rings of differing external diameters: a randomized, crossover trial

BACKGROUND

No empirical data support the 54 to 58 mm external diameter of intravaginal rings currently available and in development for contraception and other indications. Understanding how external diameter affects preference, adherence, and acceptability is critical for optimizing future product development.

OBJECTIVE

Our primary objectives were to determine which of 3 nonmedicated rings of differing external diameters was preferred and yielded the highest adherence. Secondary objectives were comparing acceptability, patterns of adherence, and safety of the 3 rings.

STUDY DESIGN

In an open-label, 3-way crossover trial, healthy, HIV-uninfected, monogamous, sexually active, nonpregnant, 18-year-old to 40-year-old cisgender women and their male partners in Atlanta, GA and the Bronx, NY were randomly assigned to the sequence of using 3 nonmedicated silicone rings (46 mm, 56 mm, and 66 mm external diameters) continuously for approximately 30 days each (90 days total; November 2021 to December 2022). We tested whether end-of-study preference for any of the 3 rings was greater than 0.33 (binomial proportion, exact test). We used mixed-effect regression models with random intercepts by participants to compare adherence (ring never out for more than 30 minutes in 24 hours) and probability of removals (including reasons for removal), expulsions, and the ring being out of the vagina all day, per ring, per day of use with the 56-mm ring as the reference group and to compare scores on a novel 19-item acceptability scale with items related to ease and experience of use and impact on sex.

RESULTS

Of 24 women, 23 completed the study (median age: 26.7 years [standard deviation: 3.78]). Most were college graduates (92%), White (63%), non-Hispanic (79%), single (79%), and nulliparous (92%). At the end of the study, 59% preferred the smallest (46 mm) ring versus 18% each for the 56-mm and 66-mm rings (P=.0045). The proportion of participants who were adherent did not differ by ring (46 mm, 78%; 56 mm, 75%; 66 mm, 59%; P=.30); however, odds of expulsion were higher for the 46-mm (odds ratio: 5.72; 95% confidence interval: 1.25-26.1) and 66-mm (odds ratio: 25.9; 95% confidence interval: 6.11-109) rings than for the 56-mm ring. The 66-mm ring also had greater odds of being out (removal or expulsion, any length of time) than the 56-mm ring (odds ratio: 6.50; 95% confidence interval: 3.46-12.2). Mean acceptability scale scores were identical (4.54/5) for the 46-mm and 56-mm (smallest and medium) rings and significantly higher than for the largest, 66-mm ring (3.94/5; P<.001).

CONCLUSION

Although the 46-mm ring was preferred by more women and had higher rates of adherence compared to the other 2 rings, the 56-mm ring was rated as equally acceptable with significantly fewer reports of expulsions/removals compared to the other 2 rings. These data confirm that the current 54 to 58 mm diameter of vaginal rings on the market and in development is acceptable and performs well. Future studies should explore the effect of other mechanical attributes, such as compressibility, on preference, adherence, and acceptability, as well as investigating ring characteristics in other populations.

Acceptability of a dapivirine levonorgestrel vaginal ring in two Phase 1 trials (MTN-030/IPM 041 and MTN-044/IPM 053/CCN019): Implications for multipurpose prevention technology development

End-user feedback early in product development is important for optimizing multipurpose prevention technologies for HIV and pregnancy prevention. We evaluated the acceptability of the 90-day dapivirine levonorgestrel ring (DPV-LNG ring) used for 14 days compared to a dapivirine-only ring (DVR-200mg) in MTN-030/IPM 041 (n = 23), and when used for 90 days cyclically or continuously in MTN-044/IPM 053/CCN019 (n = 25). We enrolled healthy, non-pregnant, HIV-negative women aged 18-45 in Pittsburgh, PA and Birmingham, AL (MTN-030 only). Self-reports of vaginal bleeding and adherence (ring removals, expulsions) were collected via daily short message service. Acceptability data were recorded in face-to-face interviews at study exit. We assessed differences in acceptability by product characteristics and adherence; and associations between baseline characteristics/demographics, number of bleeding days, adherence, and overall acceptability. Most (21/23) women in the 14-day MTN-030 study and about half (13/25) in the 90-day MTN-044 study liked their assigned rings. In MTN-030 there were no significant associations between any variables and overall acceptability of either ring. In MTN-044, women who disliked the DPV-LNG ring had a significantly higher incidence of unanticipated vaginal bleeding, and reporting that vaginal bleeding changes were unacceptable than those who liked it. Although we found no overall association between adherence and acceptability, significantly more women who disliked (versus liked) the DPV-LNG ring reported expulsions during toileting. The DPV-LNG ring could meet the needs of women seeking simultaneous protection from HIV and unintended pregnancy. Addressing issues related to vaginal bleeding and expulsions early in product development will likely enhance acceptability of the DPV-LNG ring. Trial registration: Clinical Trial Registration: MTN-030/IPM 041: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02855346; MTN-044/IPM 053/CCN019: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03467347.

Risk factors for and outcomes of ring expulsions with a 1-year contraceptive vaginal system

BACKGROUND

The US Food and Drug Administration-approved segesterone acetate and ethinyl estradiol ring-shaped contraceptive vaginal system, known as Annovera (Sever Pharma Solutions/QPharma, Malmö, Sweden), was inserted and removed under a woman's control for a 21 day in and 7 day out regimen for up to 13 cycles of use.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to describe the patterns of ring expulsion over time, to identify potential predictors of expulsion, and to evaluate the impact of expulsions on method discontinuation and pregnancy risk.

STUDY DESIGN

Using data from 2064 participants who were enrolled in 2 multinational phase 3 clinical trials on the use of this contraceptive vaginal system, we examined data from participants' daily diaries for documentation of complete ring expulsion. We modeled the odds of reported expulsions over time with adjustment for background and demographic characteristics using mixed-effects logistic regression models with random intercepts. We compared the probability of continuation between those who did and those who did not report expulsions in the first cycle of use using survival analysis and hazards modeling. To determine if expulsions during the first cycle of use affected the risk for pregnancy, we calculated Pearl Indices.

RESULTS

Most participants (75%) never experienced any expulsions during any cycle of use, and 91% to 97% did not experience an expulsion during any 1 cycle. The incidence of expulsion was highest in cycle 1 (9%). The odds of experiencing expulsions decreased by half in cycles 2 to 8 when compared with cycle 1 (0.48; 95% confidence interval, 0.40-0.58), and in cycles 9 to 13, expulsions were about a third of that in cycle 1 (0.32; 95% confidence interval, 0.26-0.41). Of those who did experience expulsions, most (62%-84%) experienced ≤2 expulsions per cycle. Participants from study sites in Latin America vs those in the United States had higher odds of not experiencing an expulsion (odds ratio, 1.95; 95% confidence interval, 1.45-2.63). Women with a higher education level had higher odds of experiencing an expulsion. Notably, parity, age, and body mass index were not associated with expulsion. Participants who experienced any expulsions in cycle 1 were more likely to discontinue use early (hazard ratio, 1.28; 95% confidence interval, 1.14-1.43) than participants who did not have an expulsion. The Pearl Index for participants who had expulsions during cycle 1 was 3.99 (95% confidence interval, 1.29-9.31), which was higher than that among participants who reported no expulsions (Pearl Index, 2.39; 95% confidence interval, 1.61-3.41), but the overlapping confidence intervals indicate that there is not sufficient evidence to demonstrate an association between expulsions and pregnancy risk.

CONCLUSION

Expulsions were infrequent overall, decreased with subsequent cycles of use, and were not associated with body mass index or parity. Early discontinuation of product use was higher among participants who experienced an expulsion during cycle 1. Although it is unclear whether pregnancy risk was associated with expulsions, early recognition of expulsions among users may identify those at higher risk for discontinuation and may highlight when enhanced anticipatory counselling and guidance may be advantageous.

Advances in contraception: vaginal contraceptive rings

The vaginal contraceptive ring is very effective and user dependent. In this article, we will discuss the different types of vaginal contraceptive rings, namely, the etonogestrel/ethinyl estradiol (ENG/EE) ring (NuvaRing, Merck, Rahway, NJ, USA) and the segesterone acetate (SA)/EE (Annovera, Mayne Pharma, Raleigh, NC, USA) ring. The details of dosing and administration, indications, advantages, disadvantages, and cost-effectiveness are presented. This literature review was conducted using PubMed and Google Scholar. The search terms included 'vaginal contraceptive ring', 'etonogestrel/ethinyl estradiol ring', and 'segesterone acetate/ethinyl estradiol ring'. The search was then sorted by year from 2000 until present, and the most recent articles were reviewed. The purpose of this article is to provide a comprehensive reference on the two vaginal contraceptive rings widely used in the United States for clinicians to guide management. Both vaginal contraceptive rings are combination of hormonal contraceptives that suppress ovulation and create physiologic conditions unfavorable for pregnancy. The ENG/EE ring is designed to be replaced monthly, while the SA/EE ring is a single device used over the course of 1 year. Common side effects of both devices include headaches, nausea, vomiting, and vaginitis. Serious adverse reactions can occur with the vaginal contraceptive rings including venous thromboembolism, psychiatric events, and hypersensitivity. Both devices are contraindicated in patients at high risk for arterial or venous thrombotic events, patients with a history of breast cancer or other estrogen/progesterone cancers, and patients with severe liver disease. Overall, the vaginal contraceptive ring is well tolerated and liked by patients. Patients should be well counseled on known severe adverse reactions. The vaginal contraceptive ring is more expensive than other forms of contraception and this should be an important point of discussion with patients.

Vaginal ring acceptability: A systematic review and meta-analysis of vaginal ring experiences from around the world

OBJECTIVE

The vaginal ring (ring) is a female-initiated, long-acting drug delivery system for different indications, including HIV prevention. Our aim was to provide evidence for acceptability of the vaginal ring across indications to support dapivirine and multipurpose prevention technology ring introduction and roll out.

STUDY DESIGN

This systematic review and meta-analysis followed PRISMA guidelines. We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and grey literature for publications reporting favorable ring acceptability and secondary outcomes involving actual ring use (comfort, ease of ring use, ring comfort during sex, expulsions, and vaginal symptoms) or hypothetical acceptability for any indication published January 1, 1970-June 15, 2021. We estimated random-effects pooled prevalence, assessing between-study variation using meta-regression.

RESULTS

Of 2,234 records, we included 123 studies with 40,434 actual and hypothetical ring users. The primary outcome assessment included 50 studies with 60 ring subgroups totaling 19,271 ring users. The favorable acceptability pooled prevalence was 85.6% (95%CI 81.3, 89.0), while hypothetical acceptability among non-ring users was 27.6% (95%CI 17.5, 40.5). In meta-regression, acceptability was higher in menopause (95.4%; 95%CI 88.4, 98.2) compared to contraceptive rings (83.7%; 95%CI 75.6, 89.5). Acceptability was lower in pharmacokinetic studies (50%; 95%CI 22.1, 77.9) compared to RCTs (89.5%; 95%CI 85.8.92.4) and in studies assessing acceptability at ≥12 months (78.5%; 95%CI 66.5, 87.1) versus studies assessing acceptability at <3 months (91.9%; 95%CI 83.7, 96.1). European (90.6%; 95%CI 83.9, 94.7), Asian (97.1%; 95%CI 92.0, 99.0), and multi-region studies (93.5%; 95%CI 84.6, 97.4) reported more favorable acceptability compared to African studies (59.4%; 95%CI 38.3, 77.5). Secondary outcomes were similarly favorable, including ring comfort (92.9%; 95%CI 89.2, 95.4), ease of use (90.9%; 95%CI 86.5, 94.0), and comfort during sex (82.7%; 95%CI 76.4, 87.6). Limitations include inconsistent outcome definitions and unmeasured factors affecting acceptability.

CONCLUSIONS

Women who used vaginal rings reported they were acceptable across indications geographic regions and indications. Policy makers should consider the ring as an important option for pregnancy and HIV prevention drug development.

IMPLICATIONS

This review found favorable acceptability among vaginal ring users across indications and geographic areas, in contrast to low hypothetical acceptability among non-users. Vaginal rings are an important drug delivery system for pregnancy and HIV preventions, and scale-up should plan to address initial hesitancy among new users.

Development of Hormonal Intravaginal Rings: Technology and Challenges

Intravaginal rings (IVRs) are minimally invasive polymeric devices specifically designed to be used for the sustained and prolonged release of various type of drugs such as hormones. One of the benefits of using topical drug delivery systems (e.g., IVRs) is the fact that systemic drug delivery may cause drug resistance due to elevated drug levels. Topical drug delivery also provides higher concentrations of the drug to the target site and has fewer side effects. In addition, when a drug is administered vaginally, the hepatic first-pass effect is avoided, resulting in higher absorption. Contraception and treatments for specific diseases such as endometriosis and hormone deficiencies can be improved by the administration of hormones via an IVR. This article aims to classify and compare various designs of commercially available and non-commercial hormonal IVRs and to analyze their performance. Current challenges affecting the development of IVRs are investigated, and proposed solutions are discussed. A comprehensive search of publications in MEDLINE/PubMed and of commercial product data of IVRs was performed, and the materials, designs, performance, and applications (e.g., contraception, endometriosis, estrogen deficiency and urogenital atrophy) of hormonal IVRs were thoroughly evaluated. Most hormonal IVRs administer female sex hormones, i.e., estrogen and progestogens. In terms of material, IVRs are divided into 3 main groups: silicone, polyurethane, and polyethylene-co-vinyl acetate IVRs. As regards their design, there are 4 major designs for IVRs which strongly affect their performance and the timing and rate of hormone release. Important challenges include reducing the burst release and maintaining the bioavailability of hormones at their site of action over a prolonged period of administration as well as lowering production costs. Hormonal IVRs are a promising method which could be used to facilitate combination therapies by administering multiple drugs in a single IVR while eliminating the side effects of conventional drug administration methods. IVRs could considerably improve womenʼs quality of life all over the world within a short period of time.

Use of simulated vaginal and menstrual fluids to model in vivo discolouration of silicone elastomer vaginal rings

Vaginal rings releasing antiretrovirals – either alone or in combination with contraceptive progestins – are being developed for prevention of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) transmission via vaginal sex. Following Phase I trials, significant discolouration was observed on the surface of investigational silicone elastomer antiretroviral-contraceptive matrix-type vaginal rings containing either 25 mg dapivirine or 200 mg dapivirine plus levonorgestrel. In this study, potential causes of the discolouration have been assessed in vitro using simulated vaginal and menstrual fluids (SVF and SMF, respectively) to model in vivo exposure. The fluid compositions also included hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂), hydrogen peroxide plus a copper intrauterine device (IUD), or synthetic dyes (representing personal care and household cleaning products). No discolouration was observed for rings exposed to SVF + hydrogen peroxide (with or without an IUD). However, the SVF + dye compositions showed significant ring discolouration, with staining patterns similar to those observed with rings that had been exposed to highly-coloured personal care and household cleaning products during clinical trial use. Exposure of rings to SMF compositions invariably caused yellow surface discolouration, dark spotting and markings, similar to the staining patterns observed following clinical use. The darker marks on the ring surface were identified as blood debris derived from the SMF. The study indicates that surface discolouration of rings in vivo can be attributed to exposure to menstrual fluid or highly coloured personal care or household cleaning products. Discolouration of the rings was not associated with any specific safety risks for the user, though severe discolouration could potentially impact acceptability and adherence.

Vaginal Administration of Contraceptives

While contraceptive drugs have enabled many people to decide when they want to have a baby, more than 100 million unintended pregnancies each year in the world may indicate the contraceptive requirement of many people has not been well addressed yet. The vagina is a well-established and practical route for the delivery of various pharmacological molecules, including contraceptives. This review aims to present an overview of different contraceptive methods focusing on the vaginal route of delivery for contraceptives, including current developments, discussing the potentials and limitations of the modern methods, designs, and how well each method performs for delivering the contraceptives and preventing pregnancy.

Long-Lasting, Patient-Controlled, Procedure-Free Contraception: A Review of Annovera with a Pharmacist Perspective

Annovera (segesterone acetate and ethinyl estradiol vaginal system) is a US Food and Drug Administration FDA-approved long-lasting, reversible contraceptive that is fully administered by the user and does not require a procedure for insertion or removal. The vaginal system is in the shape of a ring and contains low doses of a novel progestin, egesterone acetate, and ethinyl estradiol. It is made of silicone and is fully pliable and flexible. The vaginal system is reusable for 13 cycles, using a 21 days in/7 days out regimen, providing women with the ability to control their fertility. Particularly now during the COVID-19 pandemic when access to contraception has been further reduced, patients may benefit from a method that is both long-lasting and patient-controlled.

Development of multipurpose technologies products for pregnancy and STI prevention: update on polyphenylene carboxymethylene MPT gel development†

Current modern contraceptives rely heavily on the use of hormones. These birth control drug products, including pills, patches, injections, and IUDS, have been extremely beneficial to millions of women and their families over the past 50 years. But a surprisingly high number of women abandon such modern methods, many because they cannot tolerate the side effects and others because they have medical issues for which hormonal methods are contraindicated. In addition, modern hormonal methods are simply not available to many women. The extent of this problem is steadily becoming more apparent. We present the case for developing simple nonhormonal vaginal products that women can use when needed, ideal products that are multipurpose and offer both contraception and sexually transmitted disease protection. Gel-based vaginal products are particularly well suited for this purpose. Gels are easy to use, highly acceptable to many women, and can be safely formulated to enhance natural vaginal defenses against infection. However, the development of a new chemical entity for this application faces significant technical and regulatory hurdles. These challenges and our solutions are described for polyphenylene carboxymethylene (PPCM), a novel topical drug in a vaginal gel nearing human clinical trials. We have advanced PPCM from benchtop to IND-enabling studies and provide a brief description of the complex development process. We also describe a simple lab assay which can be used as a biomarker for contraceptive activity to enable pharmacodynamic studies in vaginal contraceptive development, both preclinically and in early human clinical trials.

Efficacy of the 1-year (13-cycle) segesterone acetate and ethinylestradiol contraceptive vaginal system: results of two multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase 3 trials

Background

A ring-shaped, contraceptive vaginal system designed to last 1 year (13 cycles) delivers an average of 0·15 mg segesterone acetate and 0·013 mg ethinylestradiol per day. We evaluated the efficacy of this contraceptive vaginal system and return to menses or pregnancy after use.

Methods

In two identically designed, multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase 3 trials (one at 15 US academic and community sites and one at 12 US and international academic and community sites), participants followed a 21-days-in, 7-days-out segesterone acetate and ethinylestradiol contraceptive vaginal system schedule for up to 13 cycles. Participants were healthy, sexually active, non-pregnant, non-sterilised women aged 18–40 years. Women were cautioned that any removals during the 21 days of cyclic use should not exceed 2 h, and used daily paper diaries to record vaginal system use. Consistent with regulatory requirements for contraceptives, we calculated the Pearl Index for women aged 35 years and younger, excluding adjunctive contraception cycles, as the primary efficacy outcome measure. We also did intention-to-treat Kaplan-Meier life table analyses and followed up women who did not use hormonal contraceptives or desired pregnancy after study completion for 6 months for return to menses or pregnancy. The trials are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, numbers NCT00455156 and NCT00263341.

Findings

Between Dec 19, 2006, and Oct 9, 2009, at the 15 US sites, and between Nov 1, 2006, and July 2, 2009, at the 12 US and international sites we enrolled 2278 women. Our overall efficacy analysis included 2265 participants (1130 in the US study and 1135 in the international study) and 1303 (57·5%) participants completed up to 13 cycles. The Pearl Index for the primary efficacy group was 2·98 (95% CI 2·13–4·06) per 100 woman-years, and was well within the range indicative of efficacy for a contraceptive under a woman's control. The Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed the contraceptive vaginal system was 97·5% effective, which provided further evidence of efficacy. Pregnancy occurrence was similar across cycles. All 290 follow-up participants reported return to menses or became pregnant (24 [63%] of 38 women who desired pregnancy) within 6 months.

Interpretation

The segesterone acetate and ethinylestradiol contraceptive vaginal system is an effective contraceptive for 13 consecutive cycles of use. This new product adds to the contraceptive method mix and the 1-year duration of use means that women do not need to return to the clinic or pharmacy for refills every few months.

Funding

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development of the National Institutes of Health, the US Agency for International Development, and the WHO Reproductive Health Research Department.

Advances in contraceptive vaginal rings: what does the future hold?

INTRODUCTION

Contraceptive vaginal rings (CVRs) are good contraceptive options because they do not require skilled providers, are self-administered, and show a higher stability of drug diffusion.

AREAS COVERED

This article provides a review of the developments made with CVRs over the past number of years, while giving focus to the latest CVRs that have gone through clinical development. The author of the article also provides an expert perspective on the future of these useful therapeutic options.

EXPERT OPINION

Pharmacokinetic studies have shown that segesterone, an absorbable progestin that is used alone or in combination with ethinyl estradiol (EE) or E_2, is the CVR of choice at this present time. Indeed, segesterone has demonstrated safety and efficacy as a CVR and is also an appropriate option for lactating women, as they are not absorbed orally. However, good cycle control is important for improved CVR adherence. CVRs that allow the combination of more than one drug may unravel another multi-purpose use when combined with microbicides and could provide combined protection to women who wish to protect themselves from pregnancy and sexually transmitted infection.

Solid state 13C NMR spectroscopy provides direct evidence for reaction between ethinyl estradiol and a silicone elastomer vaginal ring drug delivery system

Steroid molecules have a long history of incorporation into silicone elastomer materials for controlled release drug delivery applications. Previously, based on in vitro release testing and drug content analysis, we demonstrated indirectly that the contraceptive progestin levonorgestrel (LNG) chemically and irreversibly binds to addition cure silicone elastomers, presumably via a hydrosilylation reaction between the levonorgestrel ethynyl group and the hydrosilane groups in the poly(dimethylsiloxane-co-methylhydrosiloxane) crosslinker of the silicone elastomer. Here, for the first time, we report that solid state ¹³C nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy provides direct evidence for the irreversible binding of ethinyl estradiol (EE) - an estrogenic steroid molecule also containing an ethynyl functional group - to an addition cure silicone elastomer. By preparing silicone elastomer samples containing ¹³C-labelled EE, signals in the NMR spectra could readily be assigned to both the free and bound EE. Additional depolymerisation studies, performed on an addition cure silicone elastomer system from which the unbound EE fraction was completely extracted, further confirmed the presence of bound EE through the formation of coloured reaction mixtures resulting from the reaction of bound EE and trifluoroacetic acid (TFA). These methods will be particularly useful in the ongoing development of new steroid-releasing silicone drug delivery devices, including various vaginal ring devices for contraception, HIV prevention and multipurpose prevention technology applications.