Role of ultrasonography and MRI in the detection of wide intraductal component of invasive breast cancer—a prospective study

Preoperative prediction of the size of pure ductal carcinoma in situ using three imaging modalities as compared to histopathological size: does magnetic resonance imaging add value?

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasonography add value to traditional mammography in an Asian population with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).

METHODS

Data of 244 patients with pure DCIS treated at Severance Hospital between 2013 and 2015 were analyzed retrospectively. Data extracted included age, preoperative diagnosis, tumor size on preoperative imaging studies, and final histopathological tumor type and size, including hormone receptor status. The extent of correlation between imaging and histopathological tumor sizes was evaluated using a variety of methods, including Bland-Altman analysis.

RESULTS

The mean patient age was 52.39 years (SD = 10.31). The mean measurements of the tumor on preoperative ultrasonography, mammography, MRI, and histopathology were 1.80 (SD = 1.23) cm, 2.97 (SD = 1.92) cm, 2.53(SD = 1.84) cm, and 1.88 (SD = 1.36) cm, respectively. The mean differences in tumor size between ultrasonography, mammography, and MRI compared with histopathology were -0.09 (SD = 1.39), 1.09 (SD = 1.89), and 0.65 (SD = 1.78), respectively. The correlation between the sizes was significant with r values for ultrasonography, mammography, and MRI of 0.447 (SE = 0.061), 0.375 (SE = 0.042), and 0.409 (SE = 0.043), respectively. Mammography and MRI estimated tumor size significantly better for patients older than 50 years (p = 0.045 and <0.001, respectively). Mammography also provided good estimation for patients with a body mass index under 25 (p = 0.041).

CONCLUSION

MRI is better at estimation of histopathological DCIS size compared with mammography. However, ultrasonography had better estimation compared with MRI and mammography, probably owing to the high breast density in this population.

Accuracy of an automated breast volume ultrasound system for assessment of the pre-operative extent of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: comparison with a conventional handheld ultrasound examination

The goal of the study described here was to compare the accuracy of an automated breast volume scanner (ABVS) with that of hand-held ultrasound (HHUS) in assessing the pre-operative extent of pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). This prospective study consisted of 33 patients with histopathologically proven pure DCIS who received conventional HHUS and ABVS examinations. The discrepancy and correlation coefficients were calculated to assess differences in sizes determined by imaging and histopathologic examination. Mean age was 51.8 y. Mean lesion size as assessed with the ABVS did not differ significantly from that determined by histopathology. Lesion size was adequately estimated, under-estimated or over-estimated with the ABVS in 64%, 15% and 21% of patients, and with HHUS in 42%, 15% and 42%, respectively (p < 0.05). The coefficient of correlation between histopathologic and ABVS measurements was higher than that between histopathologic and HHUS measurements. The ABVS appears to assess the extent of the lesion better than HHUS and can provide more accurate information pre-operatively.

Evaluation of residual disease using breast MRI after excisional biopsy for breast cancer

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of our study was to assess the diagnostic performance of breast MRI in evaluating residual disease in patients after excisional biopsy for breast cancer on the basis of both morphologic and kinetic features.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Of 5304 breast MRI examinations performed between January 2007 and December 2011, 308 evaluated postoperative sites after excisional biopsy of breast cancer. Among these, 203 patients who were not treated with chemotherapy or radiotherapy before MRI and underwent definitive surgery within 30 days after MRI were enrolled. MRI findings were analyzed on the basis of contrast-enhanced subtraction images. The enhancement patterns were classified into four categories: no enhancement (P1), thin regular rim enhancement (P2), thick or irregular rim enhancement (P3), and nodular or nonmasslike enhancement (P4) around the postoperative sites. The enhancement kinetics were assessed as follows: persistent, plateau, and washout pattern.

RESULTS

From 207 breast MRI examinations in 203 patients, 144 breasts had residual breast cancer at histopathologic examination after definitive surgery. When P1 and P2 were considered negative for residual cancer and P3 and P4 were considered positive, the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy were 79.9%, 73.0%, 87.1%, 61.3%, and 77.8%, respectively. The specificity and positive predictive value improved to 90.5% and 91.7%, when analyzed with washout enhancement kinetics as another positive finding for residual cancer. A statistically significant trend of decreasing specificity and positive predictive value (p < 0.05) was found with the passage of a time interval between excision and breast MRI.

CONCLUSION

Although the overlapping features of the postsurgical changes and malignant lesions remain as the limitations, dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI is a useful tool for residual disease prediction after excisional biopsy for breast cancer. Combined use of morphologic and kinetic evaluation parameters improved the diagnostic performance. We do not recommend that MRI be unreasonably delayed after excisional biopsy considering the risk of prolonging definitive surgery.

Facile synthesis of magnetite/perfluorocarbon co-loaded organic/inorganic hybrid vesicles for dual-modality ultrasound/magnetic resonance imaging and imaging-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation

Multifunctional organic/inorganic hybrid nanovesicles, fabricated by a facile self-assembly/sol-gel approach, display a unique morphology (figure) and satisfactory stability under physiological conditions. By co-encapsulation of superparamagnetic magnetite nanoparticles and a liquid perfluorocarbon, the nanovesicles can be used not only as a dual-modality ultrasound/magnetic resonance contrast agent for accurate cancer diagnosis and monitoring, but also as a therapeutic enhancement agent for effective high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation.

The contribution of three-dimensional power Doppler imaging in the preoperative assessment of breast tumors: a preliminary report

Purpose. The aim of this study was to determine the value of 3D and 3D Power Doppler sonography in the detection of tumor malignancy in breast lesions and to find new diagnostic criteria for differential diagnosis. Methods. One hundred and twenty five women with clinically or mammographically suspicious findings were referred for 3D Power Doppler ultrasound prior to surgery. Histological diagnosis was conducted after surgery and compared with ultrasound findings. Sonographic criteria used for breast cancer diagnosis were based on a system that included morphological characteristics and criteria of the vascular pattern of a breast mass by Power Doppler imaging. Results. Seventy-two lesions were histopathologically diagnosed as benign and 53 tumors as malignant. Three-dimensional ultrasound identified 49 out of 53 histologically confirmed breast cancers resulting in a sensitivity of 92.4% and a specificity of 86.1% in diagnosing breast malignancy (PPV: 0.83, NPV:0.94). Conclusions. 3D ultrasonography is a valuable tool in identifying preoperatively the possibility of a tumor to be malignant.

Magnetic resonance imaging of ductal carcinoma in situ: what is its clinical application? A review

BACKGROUND

After breast-conserving surgery of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast or invasive breast carcinoma with an extensive intraductal component, tumor-positive surgical margins are frequently found. Therefore, the extent of the intraductal disease needs to be accurately determined preoperatively.

METHODS

Data for this review were identified by search of PubMed. Reference lists of selected articles were cross-searched for additional literature.

RESULTS

DCIS is accurately detected with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), but the typical malignant features are inconsistently seen and most often in high-grade DCIS or in DCIS with a small invasive component. The histopathologic extent of DCIS is more accurately demonstrated with MRI. However, overestimation due to benign proliferative lesions does frequently occur. An improved depiction of DCIS could lead to improved preoperative staging. Conversely, the identification of more extensive disease on MRI could give rise to unnecessary interventions. Therefore, MRI should be used carefully and preferable in specialized and experienced centers.

CONCLUSION

[corrected] To date, there is no evidence that the use of MRI improves outcomes (ie, decreases recurrence rates) in patients with DCIS.

Magnetic resonance imaging in size assessment of invasive breast carcinoma with an extensive intraductal component

Background

Breast-conserving treatment of invasive breast carcinoma with an extensive intraductal component (EIC) is associated with DCIS-involved surgical margins and therefore it has an increased recurrence rate. EIC is a non-palpable lesion of which the size is frequently underestimated on mammography. This study was undertaken to evaluate the accuracy of MRI in size assessment of breast cancer with EIC.

Methods

23 patients were identified and the mammographic (n = 21) and MR (n = 23) images were re-reviewed by a senior radiologist. Size on MR images was compared with histopathological tumour extent.

Results

The correlation of radiological size with histopathological size was r = 0.20 in mammography (p = 0.39) compared to r = 0.65 in MRI (p < 0.01). Mammography underestimated histopathological tumour size in 62%. MR images over- or underestimated tumour size in 22% and 30% of the cases, respectively. In poorly differentiated EIC, MRI adequately estimated the extent more often compared to moderately differentiated EIC (60% versus 25%, respectively).

Conclusion

Size assessment of MRI imaging was more accurate compared to mammography. This was predominantly true for poorly differentiated EIC.