The potential utility of abbreviated breast MRI (FAST MRI) as a tool for breast cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Accuracy of Abbreviated Breast MRI in Diagnosing Breast Cancer in Women with Dense Breasts Compared with Standard Imaging Modalities

Background

Breast density is an independent risk factor for breast cancer and affects the sensitivity of mammography screening. Therefore, new breast imaging approaches could benefit women with increased breast density in early cancer detection and diagnosis.

Objectives

To assess the diagnostic performance of abbreviated breast MRI compared with mammography and other imaging modalities in screening and diagnosing breast cancer among Saudi women with dense breast tissue.

Methods

A retrospective diagnostic study was conducted using anonymized medical images and histopathology information from 55 women, aged ≥30 years, who had dense breasts (Breast Imaging and Reporting Data System [BI-RADS] breast density categories C and D) and an abnormal mammogram. The sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were calculated for mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT), synthetic mammography (SM) derived from DBT, ultrasound, and abbreviated breast MRI (ABMRI).

Results

A total of 19 women had pathology-proven breast cancer. Among all methods, ABMRI showed the highest sensitivity (94.7%) and specificity (58.3%), while mammography showed the lowest (84.2% and 44.4%, respectively). AUC for ABMRI was higher than all the methods including mammography (0.751 vs. 0.643; P < 0.05).

Conclusion

ABMRI appears to be more accurate in cancer diagnosis than mammography and other modalities for women with dense breast tissue. Further research is advised on a larger sample of Saudi women to confirm the benefit of ABMRI in breast cancer screening and diagnosis for women with increased breast density.

Comparative diagnostic efficacy of abbreviated and full protocol breast MRI: a systematic review and a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

This meta-analysis compares the efficacy, limitations, and clinical implications of abbreviated breast MRI (AB-MRI) and full protocol MRI (FP-MRI), focusing on diagnostic accuracy across diverse populations. It extends previous analyses by including studies conducted after 2019 in both screening and diagnostic contexts.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review (November 2019 to December 2022), using a bivariate model to calculate summary estimates of sensitivity and specificity. Random effect models were applied for summary area under the curve (AUC), and probability distributions for negative and positive predictive values were obtained. Subgroup analyses explored differences in sensitivity, specificity, and AUC between AB-MRI and FP-MRI.

RESULTS

From 11 eligible studies (1 prospective, 10 retrospective), statistical analysis revealed a significant difference in sensitivity between FP-MRI (95%) and AB-MRI (86%, P = .005), with no significant difference in specificity (P = .50). AB-MRI's shorter acquisition time suggests potential for higher patient throughput, but challenges remain in detecting small lesions and nonmass enhancements. Some studies recommend additional sequences, like diffusion-weighted imaging, to improve diagnostic performance.

CONCLUSIONS

While FP-MRI remains the gold standard in breast cancer detection, AB-MRI offers a quicker alternative, especially in high-risk screening. However, its lower sensitivity limits its use as a standalone diagnostic tool. Future research should optimize AB-MRI protocols and consider patient-specific factors to enhance breast cancer screening and diagnostic strategies.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

This meta-analysis expands understanding of AB-MRI's role in breast cancer detection, highlighting its benefits and limitations compared to FP-MRI, particularly in terms of sensitivity and screening efficiency.

Recommendations of the German Radiological Society's breast imaging working group regarding breast MRI

· Breast MRI is an essential part of breast imaging. · The recommendations for performing breast MRI have been updated. · A table provides a compact and quick overview. More detailed comments supplement the table.. · The "classic" breast MRI can be performed based on the recommendations. Tips for special clinical questions, such as implant rupture, mammary duct pathology or local lymph node status, are included.. CITATION FORMAT: · Wenkel E, Wunderlich P, Fallenberg E et al. Aktualisierung der Empfehlungen der AG Mammadiagnostik der Deutschen Röntgengesellschaft zur Durchführung der Mamma-MRT. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2024; 196: 939 - 944.

Maintaining accuracy and expanding access: evaluating the efficacy of the Botucatu Abbreviated Breast MRI Protocol

Objective

Our study evaluated the effectiveness of the Botucatu Abbreviated Protocol in breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) within Brazil's public healthcare system, focusing on its impact on patient access to MRI exams.

Methods

This retrospective study involved 197 breast MRI exams of female patients over 18 years with histological breast carcinoma diagnosis, conducted at Hospital das Clínicas de Botucatu - UNESP between 2014 and 2018. Two experienced examiners prospectively and blindly analyzed the exams using an Integrated Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS). They first evaluated the Botucatu Abbreviated Protocol, created from sequences of the complete protocol (PC), and after an average interval of 30 days, they reassessed the same 197 exams with the complete protocol. Dynamic and morphological characteristics of lesions were assessed according to BI-RADS 5th edition criteria. The study also analyzed the average number of monthly exams before and after the implementation of Botucatu Abbreviated Protocol.

Results

The Botucatu Abbreviated Protocol showed high sensitivity (99% and 96%) and specificity (90.9% and 96%). There was a significant increase in the average monthly MRI exams from 6.62 to 23.8 post-implementation.

Conclusion

The Botucatu Abbreviated Protocol proved effective in maintaining diagnostic accuracy and improving accessibility to breast MRI exams, particularly in the public healthcare setting.

Auditing Abbreviated Breast MR Imaging: Clinical Considerations and Implications

Abbreviated breast MR (AB-MR) imaging is a relatively new breast imaging tool, which maintains diagnostic accuracy while reducing image times compared with full-protocol breast MR (FP-MR) imaging. Breast imaging audits involve calculating individual and organizational metrics, which can be compared with established benchmarks, providing a standard against which performance can be measured. Unlike FP-MR imaging, there are no established benchmarks for AB-MR imaging but studies demonstrate comparable performance for cancer detection rate, positive predictive value 3, sensitivity, and specificity with T2. We review the basics of performing an audit, including strategies to implement if benchmarks are not being met.

Optimising the diagnostic accuracy of First post-contrAst SubtracTed breast MRI (FAST MRI) through interpretation-training: a multicentre e-learning study, mapping the learning curve of NHS Breast Screening Programme (NHSBSP) mammogram readers using an enriched dataset

BACKGROUND

Abbreviated breast MRI (FAST MRI) is being introduced into clinical practice to screen women with mammographically dense breasts or with a personal history of breast cancer. This study aimed to optimise diagnostic accuracy through the adaptation of interpretation-training.

METHODS

A FAST MRI interpretation-training programme (short presentations and guided hands-on workstation teaching) was adapted to provide additional training during the assessment task (interpretation of an enriched dataset of 125 FAST MRI scans) by giving readers feedback about the true outcome of each scan immediately after each scan was interpreted (formative assessment). Reader interaction with the FAST MRI scans used developed software (RiViewer) that recorded reader opinions and reading times for each scan. The training programme was additionally adapted for remote e-learning delivery.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective, blinded interpretation of an enriched dataset by multiple readers.

RESULTS

43 mammogram readers completed the training, 22 who interpreted breast MRI in their clinical role (Group 1) and 21 who did not (Group 2). Overall sensitivity was 83% (95%CI 81-84%; 1994/2408), specificity 94% (95%CI 93-94%; 7806/8338), readers' agreement with the true outcome kappa = 0.75 (95%CI 0.74-0.77) and diagnostic odds ratio = 70.67 (95%CI 61.59-81.09). Group 1 readers showed similar sensitivity (84%) to Group 2 (82% p = 0.14), but slightly higher specificity (94% v. 93%, p = 0.001). Concordance with the ground truth increased significantly with the number of FAST MRI scans read through the formative assessment task (p = 0.002) but by differing amounts depending on whether or not a reader had previously attended FAST MRI training (interaction p = 0.02). Concordance with the ground truth was significantly associated with reading batch size (p = 0.02), tending to worsen when more than 50 scans were read per batch. Group 1 took a median of 56 seconds (range 8-47,466) to interpret each FAST MRI scan compared with 78 (14-22,830, p < 0.0001) for Group 2.

CONCLUSIONS

Provision of immediate feedback to mammogram readers during the assessment test set reading task increased specificity for FAST MRI interpretation and achieved high diagnostic accuracy. Optimal reading-batch size for FAST MRI was 50 reads per batch. Trial registration (25/09/2019): ISRCTN16624917.

How to manage type 2 curve dilemma in dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: diffusion-weighted imaging or early phase enhancement kinetics?

BACKGROUND

Type 2 time-intensity curves can indicate both malignant and benign breast lesions in dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI).

PURPOSE

To investigate whether diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) or early phase kinetics of DCE-MRI is practical to discriminate breast masses that depict type 2 curve in DCE-MRI.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We retrospectively included 107 lesions in 97 patients with type 2 curves in DCE-MRI. Morphological characteristics, early phase dynamic parameters on DCE-MRI, and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values on DWI were evaluated. Diagnostic thresholds of ADC and early phase maximum enhancement ratio (EPMER) to distinguish between benign and malignant masses were calculated. Strongest predictors of malignancy were determined to build the most effective diagnostic model.

RESULTS

DWI, EPMER, and all morphological features were found statistically significant to discriminate malignancy (P <0.05). The thresholds of ADC and EPMER were assigned as 1.0 ×10-3 mm2/s and 72%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity were 80% and 97% for ADC, and 93% and 60% for EPMER, respectively. Two models were established. Model 1 comprised ADC and the lesion margin. Model 2 consisted of ADC, margin, and EPMER with a high specificity (99%) and positive predictive value (97%).

CONCLUSION

When combined with DWI, early phase wash-in data provide diagnostic improvement of breast masses presenting type 2 curve in the late phase of DCE-MRI, especially for specificity. Future studies are required to support our findings for the need of a cross-validation.

Abbreviated Breast MRI: State of the Art

Abbreviated MRI is an umbrella term, defined as a focused MRI examination tailored to answer a single specific clinical question. For abbreviated breast MRI, this question is: "Is there evidence of breast cancer?" Abbreviated MRI of the breast makes maximum use of the fact that the kinetics of breast cancers and of benign tissue differ most in the very early postcontrast phase; therefore, abbreviated breast MRI focuses on this period. The different published approaches to abbreviated MRI include the following three subtypes: (a) short protocols, consisting of a precontrast and either a single postcontrast acquisition (first postcontrast subtracted [FAST]) or a time-resolved series of postcontrast acquisitions with lower spatial resolution (ultrafast [UF]), obtained during the early postcontrast phase immediately after contrast agent injection; (b) abridged protocols, consisting of FAST or UF acquisitions plus selected additional pulse sequences; and (c) noncontrast protocols, where diffusion-weighted imaging replaces the contrast information. Abbreviated MRI was proposed to increase tolerability of and access to breast MRI as a screening tool. But its widening application now includes follow-up after breast cancer and even diagnostic assessment. This review defines the three subtypes of abbreviated MRI, highlighting the differences between the protocols and their clinical implications and summarizing the respective evidence on diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility.

Abbreviated breast MRI for evaluating breast cancer before initiation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy: A cross-sectional study

Background

Although, there are accumulating evidence about diagnostic role of abbreviated breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in screening setting, the implementation of abbreviated MRI in staging of breast cancer has been poorly elucidated.

Objective

To evaluate the diagnostic performance of abbreviated breast MRI in estimating extent of disease before initiation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Methods

A total of 54 patients with biopsy-proven main lesion referred to evaluate by standard protocol breast MRI before initiation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy were retrospectively enrolled. From a standard protocol, a data set of abbreviated protocol consisting fat-saturated T1-weighted (T1W) pre-contrast and first two fat-saturated T1W post-contrast series with reconstruction of their subtraction including maximum intensity projection (MIP) were obtained and interpreted. The concordance rate of abbreviated with standard protocol (as a reference standard) were compared. Diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value were calculated, as well.

Results

The maximum size of the main mass was 38.6 ± 17.3 and 40.7 ± 17.9 for abbreviated and standard protocol, respectively. All of the main mass was detected by abbreviated protocol with 100% concordance. Concordance was 98.1% and 94.4% in terms of multifocal/multicentric status and for estimating of NME, respectively. The abbreviated protocol has high sensitivity and specificity with more than 90% value regarding main mass detection, measurement of the maximum size of the main mass, determination of multifocal/multicenter status and NAC involvement.

Conclusion

Abbreviated protocol may be a reliable surrogate for standard protocol breast MRI in evaluating extent of breast cancer.

New Approaches and Recommendations for Risk-Adapted Breast Cancer Screening

Population-based breast cancer screening using mammography as the gold standard imaging modality has been in clinical practice for over 40 years. However, the limitations of mammography in terms of sensitivity and high false-positive rates, particularly in high-risk women, challenge the indiscriminate nature of population-based screening. Additionally, in light of expanding research on new breast cancer risk factors, there is a growing consensus that breast cancer screening should move toward a risk-adapted approach. Recent advancements in breast imaging technology, including contrast material-enhanced mammography (CEM), ultrasound (US) (automated-breast US, Doppler, elastography US), and especially magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (abbreviated, ultrafast, and contrast-agent free), may provide new opportunities for risk-adapted personalized screening strategies. Moreover, the integration of artificial intelligence and radiomics techniques has the potential to enhance the performance of risk-adapted screening. This review article summarizes the current evidence and challenges in breast cancer screening and highlights potential future perspectives for various imaging techniques in a risk-adapted breast cancer screening approach. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 1. TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 5.

Towards a fast PET/MRI protocol for breast cancer imaging: maintaining diagnostic confidence while reducing PET and MRI acquisition times

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the diagnostic feasibility of a shortened breast PET/MRI protocol in breast cancer patients.

METHODS

Altogether 90 women with newly diagnosed T1tumor-staged (T1ts) and T2tumor-staged (T2ts) breast cancer were included in this retrospective study. All underwent a dedicated comprehensive breast [18F]FDG-PET/MRI. List-mode PET data were retrospectively reconstructed with 20, 15, 10, and 5 min for each patient to simulate the effect of reduced PET acquisition times. The SUVmax/mean of all malign breast lesions was measured. Furthermore, breast PET data reconstructions were analyzed regarding image quality, lesion detectability, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and image noise (IN). The simultaneously acquired comprehensive MRI protocol was then shortened by retrospectively removing sequences from the protocol. Differences in malignant breast lesion detectability between the original and the fast breast MRI protocol were evaluated lesion-based. The 20-min PET reconstructions and the original MRI protocol served as reference.

RESULTS

In all PET reconstructions, 127 congruent breast lesions could be detected. Group comparison and T1ts vs. T2ts subgroup comparison revealed no significant difference of subjective image quality between 20, 15, 10, and 5 min acquisition times. SNR of qualitative image evaluation revealed no significant difference between different PET acquisition times. A slight but significant increase of IN with decreasing PET acquisition times could be detected. Lesion SUVmax group comparison between all PET acquisition times revealed no significant differences. Lesion-based evaluation revealed no significant difference in breast lesion detectability between original and fast breast MRI protocols.

CONCLUSIONS

Breast [18F]FDG-PET/MRI protocols can be shortened from 20 to below 10 min without losing essential diagnostic information.

KEY POINTS

• A highly accurate breast cancer evaluation is possible by the shortened breast [18F]FDG-PET/MRI examination protocol. • Significant time saving at breast [18F]FDG-PET/MRI protocol could increase patient satisfaction and patient throughput for breast cancer patients at PET/MRI.

Breast Cancer Screening for Women at Higher-Than-Average Risk: Updated Recommendations From the ACR

Early detection decreases breast cancer death. The ACR recommends annual screening beginning at age 40 for women of average risk and earlier and/or more intensive screening for women at higher-than-average risk. For most women at higher-than-average risk, the supplemental screening method of choice is breast MRI. Women with genetics-based increased risk, those with a calculated lifetime risk of 20% or more, and those exposed to chest radiation at young ages are recommended to undergo MRI surveillance starting at ages 25 to 30 and annual mammography (with a variable starting age between 25 and 40, depending on the type of risk). Mutation carriers can delay mammographic screening until age 40 if annual screening breast MRI is performed as recommended. Women diagnosed with breast cancer before age 50 or with personal histories of breast cancer and dense breasts should undergo annual supplemental breast MRI. Others with personal histories, and those with atypia at biopsy, should strongly consider MRI screening, especially if other risk factors are present. For women with dense breasts who desire supplemental screening, breast MRI is recommended. For those who qualify for but cannot undergo breast MRI, contrast-enhanced mammography or ultrasound could be considered. All women should undergo risk assessment by age 25, especially Black women and women of Ashkenazi Jewish heritage, so that those at higher-than-average risk can be identified and appropriate screening initiated.

Comparative Performance of Contrast-enhanced Mammography, Abbreviated Breast MRI, and Standard Breast MRI for Breast Cancer Screening

Background Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) and abbreviated breast MRI (ABMRI) are emerging alternatives to standard MRI for supplemental breast cancer screening. Purpose To compare the diagnostic performance of CEM, ABMRI, and standard MRI. Materials and Methods This single-institution, prospective, blinded reader study included female participants referred for breast MRI from January 2018 to June 2021. CEM was performed within 14 days of standard MRI; ABMRI was produced from standard MRI images. Two readers independently interpreted each CEM and ABMRI after a washout period. Examination-level performance metrics calculated were recall rate, cancer detection, and false-positive biopsy recommendation rates per 1000 examinations and sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of biopsy recommendation. Bootstrap and permutation tests were used to calculate 95% CIs and compare modalities. Results Evaluated were 492 paired CEM and ABMRI interpretations from 246 participants (median age, 51 years; IQR, 43-61 years). On 49 MRI scans with lesions recommended for biopsy, nine lesions showed malignant pathology. No differences in ABMRI and standard MRI performance were identified. Compared with standard MRI, CEM demonstrated significantly lower recall rate (14.0% vs 22.8%; difference, -8.7%; 95% CI: -14.0, -3.5), lower false-positive biopsy recommendation rate per 1000 examinations (65.0 vs 162.6; difference, -97.6; 95% CI: -146.3, -50.8), and higher specificity (87.8% vs 80.2%; difference, 7.6%; 95% CI: 2.3, 13.1). Compared with standard MRI, CEM had significantly lower cancer detection rate (22.4 vs 36.6; difference, -14.2; 95% CI: -28.5, -2.0) and sensitivity (61.1% vs 100%; difference, -38.9%; 95% CI: -66.7, -12.5). The performance differences between CEM and ABMRI were similar to those observed between CEM and standard MRI. Conclusion ABMRI had comparable performance to standard MRI and may support more efficient MRI screening. CEM had lower recall and higher specificity compared with standard MRI or ABMRI, offset by lower cancer detection rate and sensitivity compared with standard MRI. These trade-offs warrant further consideration of patient population characteristics before widespread screening with CEM. Clinical trial registration no. NCT03517813 © RSNA, 2023 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Chang in this issue.

Breast MRI: an illustration of benign findings

Despite its unparalleled sensitivity for aggressive breast cancer, breast MRI continually excites criticism for a specificity that lags behind that of modern mammographic techniques. Radiologists reporting breast MRI need to recognise the range of benign appearances on breast MRI to avoid unnecessary biopsy. This review summarises the reported diagnostic accuracy of breast MRI with particular attention to the technique's specificity, provides a referenced reporting strategy and discusses factors that compromise diagnostic confidence. We then present a pictorial review of benign findings on breast MRI. Enhancing radiological skills to discriminate malignant from benign findings will minimise false positive biopsies, enabling optimal use of multiparametric breast MRI for the benefit of screening clients and breast cancer patients.

Abbreviated Breast MRI Utilization: A Survey of the Society of Breast Imaging

OBJECTIVE

To survey Society of Breast Imaging (SBI) membership on their use of abbreviated breast MRI to understand variability in practice patterns.

METHODS

A survey was developed by the SBI Patient Care and Delivery committee for distribution to SBI membership in July and August 2021. Eighteen questions queried practice demographics and then abbreviated breast MRI practices regarding initial adoption, scheduling and finances, MRI protocols, and interpretations. Comparisons between responses were made by practice demographics.

RESULTS

There were 321 respondents (response rate: 15.3%), of whom 25% (81/321) currently offer and 26% (84/321) plan to offer abbreviated breast MRI. Practices in the South (37/107, 35%) and Midwest (22/70, 31%) were more likely to offer abbreviated MRI (P = 0.005). Practices adopted many strategies to raise awareness, most directed at referring providers. The mean charge to patients was $414, and only 6% of practices offer financial support. The median time slot for studies is 20 minutes, with only 15% of practices using block scheduling of consecutive breast MRIs. Regarding MRI protocols, 64% (37/58) of respondents included only a single first-pass post-contrast sequence, and 90% (52/58) included T2-weighted sequences. Patient eligibility was highly varied, and a majority of respondents (37/58, 64%) do not provide any recommendations for screening intervals in non-high-risk women.

CONCLUSION

Abbreviated breast MRI utilization is growing rapidly, and practices are applying a variety of strategies to facilitate adoption. Although there is notable variability in patient eligibility, follow-up intervals, and costs, there is some agreement regarding abbreviated breast MRI protocols.

Evaluating the effectiveness of abbreviated breast MRI (abMRI) interpretation training for mammogram readers: a multi-centre study assessing diagnostic performance, using an enriched dataset

BACKGROUND

Abbreviated breast MRI (abMRI) is being introduced in breast screening trials and clinical practice, particularly for women with dense breasts. Upscaling abMRI provision requires the workforce of mammogram readers to learn to effectively interpret abMRI. The purpose of this study was to examine the diagnostic accuracy of mammogram readers to interpret abMRI after a single day of standardised small-group training and to compare diagnostic performance of mammogram readers experienced in full-protocol breast MRI (fpMRI) interpretation (Group 1) with that of those without fpMRI interpretation experience (Group 2).

METHODS

Mammogram readers were recruited from six NHS Breast Screening Programme sites. Small-group hands-on workstation training was provided, with subsequent prospective, independent, blinded interpretation of an enriched dataset with known outcome. A simplified form of abMRI (first post-contrast subtracted images (FAST MRI), displayed as maximum-intensity projection (MIP) and subtracted slice stack) was used. Per-breast and per-lesion diagnostic accuracy analysis was undertaken, with comparison across groups, and double-reading simulation of a consecutive screening subset.

RESULTS

37 readers (Group 1: 17, Group 2: 20) completed the reading task of 125 scans (250 breasts) (total = 9250 reads). Overall sensitivity was 86% (95% confidence interval (CI) 84-87%; 1776/2072) and specificity 86% (95%CI 85-86%; 6140/7178). Group 1 showed significantly higher sensitivity (843/952; 89%; 95%CI 86-91%) and higher specificity (2957/3298; 90%; 95%CI 89-91%) than Group 2 (sensitivity = 83%; 95%CI 81-85% (933/1120) p < 0.0001; specificity = 82%; 95%CI 81-83% (3183/3880) p < 0.0001). Inter-reader agreement was higher for Group 1 (kappa = 0.73; 95%CI 0.68-0.79) than for Group 2 (kappa = 0.51; 95%CI 0.45-0.56). Specificity improved for Group 2, from the first 55 cases (81%) to the remaining 70 (83%) (p = 0.02) but not for Group 1 (90-89% p = 0.44), whereas sensitivity remained consistent for both Group 1 (88-89%) and Group 2 (83-84%).

CONCLUSIONS

Single-day abMRI interpretation training for mammogram readers achieved an overall diagnostic performance within benchmarks published for fpMRI but was insufficient for diagnostic accuracy of mammogram readers new to breast MRI to match that of experienced fpMRI readers. Novice MRI reader performance improved during the reading task, suggesting that additional training could further narrow this performance gap.

Outcomes of Abbreviated MRI (Ab-MRI) for Women of any Breast Cancer Risk and Breast Density in a Community Academic Setting

BACKGROUND

Abbreviated magnetic resonance imaging (Ab-MRI) has been evaluated for elevated breast cancer risk or dense breasts but has not been evaluated across all risk profiles.

METHODS

Patients selected underwent Ab-MRI from February 2020 to September 2021. Women were older than aged 30 years, up to date with screening mammography, and paid $299 cash.

RESULTS

A total of 93 patients were identified with a mean age of 52 years; 92.5% were Caucasian, 0% black, and 97.9% were from high socioeconomic status. Mean Gail score was 14.2, and 83.3% had a lifetime risk of breast cancer <20%. Reasons for Ab-MRI: dense breasts (36.6%); family history (24.7%); palpable mass (12.9%). Providers ordering: OBGYN (49.5%); breast surgeon (39.1%); primary care (6.6%). Thirteen biopsies (14%) detected one breast cancer. 31.1% had a change in follow-up screening: 58.6% 6-month MRI, 20.7% 6-month mammogram, and 10.3% 6-month ultrasound. Negative predictive value was 100% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 95-100%, p < 0.0001). Sensitivity was 100% (95% CI: 2.5-100%, p < 0.0001), and specificity was 87% (95% CI: 78.3-93.1%, p < 0.0001) compared with 77.6% and 98.8% for mammography. Only one cancer was detected: cost of $27,807 plus cost of 13 MRI or ultrasound (US)-guided biopsies and additional follow-up imaging. Historically 20% of abnormalities detected on full MRI are malignant; however, 7.7% of ab-MRI abnormalities were malignant CONCLUSIONS: One third of women were recommended a change in follow-up, which predominantly included a 6-month MRI. Ab-MRI may introduce average risk women to unnecessary follow-up and increased biopsies with a lower cancer detection rate. Ab-MRI should be evaluated closely before implementation.

FAST breast magnetic resonance imaging: a new approach for breast cancer screening?

OBJECTIVE

To develop an abbreviated breast magnetic resonance imaging protocol (FAST) and to compare it with the complete protocol (FULL) to determine its diagnostic accuracy for detecting malignant or suspicious lesions (BI-RADS 4, 5 and 6) and the time required for image interpretation using BI-RADS categorization.

METHODS

Retrospective study with 100 consecutive women who underwent breast magnetic resonance imaging between January and February 2014. All patients were submitted to a complete breast magnetic resonance imaging protocol, which was then compared with an abbreviated protocol (pre-contrast sequence, second post-contrast sequence and subtraction of pre- from post-contrast images).

RESULTS

Of 100 patients, 4 were classified as BI-RADS 5 or 6 and 16 as BI-RADS 4. In these 20 patients, there was full agreement among readers regarding the final BI-RADS categorization in both (FAST and FULL) protocols.

CONCLUSION

The FAST protocol reduces interpretation time without compromising the accuracy of the method for detection of malignant or suspicious lesions.

Diffusion Breast MRI: Current Standard and Emerging Techniques

The role of diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) as a biomarker has been the subject of active investigation in the field of breast radiology. By quantifying the random motion of water within a voxel of tissue, DWI provides indirect metrics that reveal cellularity and architectural features. Studies show that data obtained from DWI may provide information related to the characterization, prognosis, and treatment response of breast cancer. The incorporation of DWI in breast imaging demonstrates its potential to serve as a non-invasive tool to help guide diagnosis and treatment. In this review, current technical literature of diffusion-weighted breast imaging will be discussed, in addition to clinical applications, advanced techniques, and emerging use in the field of radiomics.

MRI Screening of BRCA Mutation Carriers: Comparison of Standard Protocol and Abbreviated Protocols With and Without T2-Weighted Images

BACKGROUND. Increasing evidence supports the role of abbreviated MRI protocols for breast cancer detection. However, abbreviated protocols have been poorly studied in patients who are BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers. Furthermore, the need for T2-weighted sequences in abbreviated protocols remains controversial. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to compare, in the evaluation of patients with BRCA mutations, the diagnostic performance of a standard full breast MRI protocol with the performance of abbreviated protocols that included and did not include a T2-weighted sequence. METHODS. This retrospective study included 292 patients (mean age, 47.9 years) who were BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers who underwent 427 screening breast MRI examinations according to a standard full protocol who could be classified as having benign (n = 407) or malignant (n = 20) findings based on histopathology or imaging follow-up. Four readers independently assessed examinations in three separate sessions (theoretic abbreviated protocol, which included the first postcontrast acquisition; theoretic abbreviated protocol with addition of a T2-weighted sequence; and the standard full protocol) and assigned BI-RADS categories. Categories 3-5 were considered to represent positive examinations. Interreader agreement was assessed, and diagnostic performance was compared by use of pooled reader data. RESULTS. Interreader agreement on BI-RADS category, expressed as kappa values, was 0.55 for the standard, 0.45 for the abbreviated, and 0.57 for the abbreviated plus T2-weighted protocols. Pooled sensitivity was 94% for the standard, 92% for the abbreviated, and 90% for the abbreviated plus T2-weighted protocols (all p > .001). Pooled specificity was 80% for the standard, 71% for the abbreviated, and 83% for the abbreviated plus T2-weighted protocols (p < .001 for abbreviated plus T2-weighted compared with both standard and abbreviated). Pooled PPV was 19% for the standard, 14% for the abbreviated, and 20% for the abbreviated plus T2-weighted protocols (p < .001 for abbreviated compared with both standard and abbreviated). Pooled NPV was 100% for the standard, 99% for the abbreviated, and 99% for the abbreviated plus T2-weighted (all p > .001) protocols. Pooled accuracy was 80% for the standard, 73% for the abbreviated, and 83% for the abbreviated plus T2-weighted protocols (p < .001 for abbreviated compared with both standard and abbreviated plus T2-weighted). CONCLUSION. The abbreviated protocol without T2-weighted imaging had suboptimal performance. However, addition of the T2-weighted sequence yielded comparable sensitivity and accuracy and a small increase in specificity compared with the full protocol. CLINICAL IMPACT. The findings support implementation of abbreviated MRI with T2-weighted imaging for breast cancer screening of patients with BRCA mutations.

A Concise Review on the Utilization of Abbreviated Protocol Breast MRI over Full Diagnostic Protocol in Breast Cancer Detection

Breast MRI possesses high sensitivity for detecting breast cancer among the current clinical modalities and is an indispensable imaging practice. Breast MRI comprises diffusion-weighted imaging, ultrafast, and T2 weighted and T1 weighted CE (contrast-enhanced) imaging that may be utilized for improving the characterization of the lesions. This multimodal evaluation of breast lesions enables outstanding discrimination between the malignant and benign and malignant lesions. The expanding indications of breast MRI confirm the far superiority of MRI in preoperative staging, especially in the estimation of tumour size and identifying tumour foci in the contralateral and ipsilateral breast. Recent studies depicted that experts can meritoriously utilize this tool for improving breast cancer surgery despite their existence of no significant long term outcomes. For managing the, directly and indirectly, associated screening cost, abbreviated protocols are found to be more beneficial. Further, in some of the patients who were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, breast MRI is utilized for documenting response. It is therefore essential to realise that oncological screening must be easily available, cost-effective, and time-consuming. Earlier detection of this short sequence protocol leads to prior and early breast cancer disease in high risky female populations like women with dense breasts, prehistoric evidence, etc. This proper utilization of AP reduces unnecessary mastectomies. Hence, this review focused on the explorative information for strongly suggesting the benefits of AP breast MRI compared to full diagnostic protocol MRI.

What's Hot in Breast MRI

Several articles in the literature have demonstrated a promising role for breast MRI techniques that are more economic in total exam time than others when used as supplement to mammography for detection and diagnosis of breast cancer. There are many technical factors that must be considered in the shortened breast MRI protocols to cut down time of standard ones, including using optimal fat suppression, gadolinium-chelates intravascular contrast administrations for dynamic imaging with post processing subtractions and maximum intensity projections (MIP) high spatial and temporal resolution among others. Multiparametric breast MRI that includes both gadolinium-dependent, i.e., dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE-MRI) and gadolinium-free techniques, i.e., diffusion-weighted/diffusion-tensor magnetic resonance imaging (DWI/DTI) are shown by several investigators that can provide extremely high sensitivity and specificity for detection of breast cancer. This article provides an overview of the proven indications for breast MRI including breast cancer screening for higher than average risk, determining chemotherapy induced tumor response, detecting residual tumor after incomplete surgical excision, detecting occult cancer in patients presenting with axillary node metastasis, detecting residual tumor after incomplete breast cancer surgical excision, detecting cancer when results of conventional imaging are equivocal, as well patients suspicious of having breast implant rupture. Despite having the highest sensitivity for breast cancer detection, there are pitfalls, however, secondary to false positive and false negative contrast enhancement and contrast-free MRI techniques. Awareness of the strengths and limitations of different approaches to obtain state of the art MR images of the breast will facilitate the work-up of patients with suspicious breast lesions.

Implementation of Abbreviated Breast MRI for Screening: AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review

Abbreviated breast MRI (AB-MRI) is being rapidly adopted to harness the high sensitivity of screening MRI while addressing issues related to access, cost, and workflow. The successful implementation of an ABI-MRI program requires collaboration across administrative, operational, financial, technical, and clinical providers. Institutions must be thoughtful in defining AB-MRI patient eligibility and providing recommendations for screening intervals, as existing practices are heterogeneous. Similarly, there is no universally accepted AB-MRI protocol, though guiding principles should harmonize abbreviated and full protocols while being mindful of scan duration and table time. The interpretation of AB-MRI will be a new experience for many radiologists and may require a phased rollout as well as a careful audit of performance metrics over time to ensure benchmark metrics are achieved. AB-MRI finances, which are driven by patient self-payment, will require buy-in from hospital administration with the recognition that downstream revenues will be needed to support initial costs. Finally, successful startup of an AB-MRI program requires active engagement with the larger community of patients and referring providers. As AB-MRI becomes more widely accepted and available, best practices and community standards will continue to evolve to ensure high quality patient care.

Abbreviated magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer: A systematic review of literature

BACKGROUND

: magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been increasingly used to study breast cancer for screening high-risk cases, pre-operative staging, and problem-solving because of its high sensitivity. However, its cost-effectiveness is still debated. Thus, the concept of abbreviated MRI (ABB-MRI) protocols was proposed as a possible solution for reducing MRI costs.

PURPOSE

: to investigate the role of the abbreviated MRI protocols in detecting and staging breast cancer.

METHODS

: a systematic search of the literature was carried out in the bibliographic databases: Scopus, PubMed, Medline, and Science Direct.

RESULTS

: forty-one articles were included, which described results of the assessment of fifty-three abbreviated protocols for screening, staging, recurrence assessing, and problem-solving or clarification.

CONCLUSIONS

: the use of ABB-MRI protocols allows reducing the acquisition and reading times, maintaining a high concordance with the final interpretation, in comparison to a complete protocol. However, larger prospective and multicentre trials are necessary to validate the performance in specific clinical environments.