Qualitative and quantitative DECT pulmonary angiography in COVID-19 pneumonia and pulmonary embolism

Distribution of Aeration and Pulmonary Blood Volume in Healthy, ARDS and COVID-19 Lungs: A Dual-Energy Computed Tomography Retrospective Cohort Study

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Few reports have studied lung aeration and perfusion in normal lungs, COVID-19, and ARDS from other causes (NC-ARDS) using dual-energy computed tomography pulmonary angiograms (DE-CTPA). To describe lung aeration and blood-volume distribution using DE-CTPAs of patients with NC-ARDS, COVID-19, and controls with a normal DE-CTPA ("healthy lungs"). We hypothesized that each of these conditions has unique ranges of aeration and pulmonary blood volumes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective, single-center study of DE-CTPAs included patients with COVID-19, NC-ARDS (Berlin criteria), and controls. Patients with macroscopic pulmonary embolisms were excluded. The outcomes studied were the (1) lung blood-volume in areas with different aeration levels (normal, ground glass opacities [GGO], consolidated lung) and (2) aeration/blood-volume ratios.

RESULTS

Included were 20 patients with COVID-19 (10 milds, 10 moderate-severe), six with NC-ARDS, and 12 healthy-controls. Lung aeration was lowest in patients with severe COVID-19 24% (IQR13%-31%) followed by those with NC-ARDS 40%(IQR21%-46%). Blood-volume in GGO was lowest in patients with COVID-19 [moderate-severe:-28.6 (IQR-33.1-23.2); mild: -30.1 (IQR-33.3-23.4)] and highest in normally aerated areas in NC-ARDS -37.4 (IQR-52.5-30.2-) and moderate-severe COVID-19 -33.5(IQR-44.2-28.5). The median aeration/blood-volume ratio was lowest in severe COVID-19 but some values overlapped with those observed among patients with NC-ARDS.

CONCLUSION

Severe COVID-19 disease is associated with low total aerated lung volume and blood-volume in areas with GGO and overall aeration/blood volume ratios, and with high blood volume in normal lung areas. In this hypothesis-generating study, these findings were most pronounced in severe COVID disease. Larger studies are needed to confirm these preliminary findings.

Pathophysiology of Hypoxemia in COVID-19 Lung Disease

As the pandemic has progressed, our understanding of hypoxemia in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) lung disease has become more nuanced, although much remains to be understood. In this article, we review ventilation-perfusion mismatching in COVID-19 and the evidence to support various biologic theories offered in explanation. In addition, the relationship between hypoxemia and other features of severe COVID-19 lung disease such as respiratory symptoms, radiographic abnormalities, and pulmonary mechanics is explored. Recognizing and understanding hypoxemia in COVID-19 lung disease remains essential for risk stratification, prognostication, and choice of appropriate treatments in severe COVID-19.

Quantitative Assessment of Lung Volumes and Enhancement in Patients with COVID-19: Role of Dual-Energy CT

Dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) has been used for detecting pulmonary embolism, but the role of lung perfusion DECT as a predictor of prognosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has not been defined yet. The aim of our study was to explore whether the enhancement pattern in COVID-19+ patients relates to the disease outcome. A secondary aim was to compare the lung volumes in two subgroups of patients. In this observational study, we considered all consecutive COVID-19+ patients who presented to the emergency room between January 2021 and December 2021 with respiratory symptoms (with mild to absent lung consolidation) and were studied by chest contrast-enhanced DECT to be eligible. Two experienced radiologists post-processed the images using the "lung-analysis" software (SyngoVia). Absolute and relative enhancement lung volumes were assessed. Patients were stratified in two subgroups depending on clinical outcome at 30 days: (i) good outcome (i.e., discharge, absence of clinical or imaging signs of disease); (ii) bad outcome (i.e., hospitalization, death). Patient sub-groups were compared using chi-square test or Fisher test for qualitative parameters, chi-square test or Spearman's Rho test for quantitative parameters, Students' t-test for parametric variables and Wilcoxon test for non-parametric variables. We enrolled 78 patients (45M), of whom, 16.7% had good outcomes. We did not observe any significant differences between the two groups, both in terms of the total enhancement evaluation (p = 0.679) and of the relative enhancement (p = 0.918). In contrast, the average lung volume of good outcome patients (mean value of 4262 mL) was significantly larger than that of bad outcome patients (mean value of 3577.8 mL), p = 0.0116. All COVID-19+ patients, with either good or bad outcomes, presented similar enhancement parameters and relative enhancements, underlining no differences in lung perfusion. Conversely, a significant drop in lung volume was identified in the bad outcome subgroup eligible compared to the good outcome subgroup.

Utility of dual-energy computed tomography in the association of COVID-19 pneumonia severity

Aim

Coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonia differs from ordinary pneumonia in that it is associated with lesions that reduce pulmonary perfusion. Dual-energy computed tomography is well suited to elucidate the etiology of coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonia, because it highlights changes in organ blood flow. In this study, we investigated whether dual-energy computed tomography could be used to determine the severity of coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonia.

Methods

Patients who were diagnosed with coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonia, admitted to our hospital, and underwent dual-energy computed tomography were included in this study. Dual-energy computed tomography findings, plane computed tomography findings, disease severity, laboratory data, and clinical features were compared between two groups: a critical group (18 patients) and a non-critical group (30 patients).

Results

The dual-energy computed tomography results indicated that the percentage of flow loss was significantly higher in the critical group compared with the non-critical group (P < 0.001). Additionally, our data demonstrated that thrombotic risk was associated with differences in clinical characteristics (P = 0.018). Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed that the percentage of flow loss, evaluated using dual-energy computed tomography, could predict severity in the critical group with 100% sensitivity and 77% specificity. However, there were no significant differences in the receiver operating characteristic values for dual-energy computed tomography and plane computed tomography.

Conclusion

Dual-energy computed tomography can be used to associate the severity of coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonia with high accuracy. Further studies are needed to draw definitive conclusions.

Lung aeration, ventilation, and perfusion imaging

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Lung imaging is a cornerstone of the management of patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU), providing anatomical and functional information on the respiratory system function. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of mechanisms and applications of conventional and emerging lung imaging techniques in critically ill patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Chest radiographs provide information on lung structure and have several limitations in the ICU setting; however, scoring systems can be used to stratify patient severity and predict clinical outcomes. Computed tomography (CT) is the gold standard for assessment of lung aeration but requires moving the patients to the CT facility. Dual-energy CT has been recently applied to simultaneous study of lung aeration and perfusion in patients with respiratory failure. Lung ultrasound has an established role in the routine bedside assessment of ICU patients, but has poor spatial resolution and largely relies on the analysis of artifacts. Electrical impedance tomography is an emerging technique capable of depicting ventilation and perfusion at the bedside and at the regional level.

SUMMARY

Clinicians should be confident with the technical aspects, indications, and limitations of each lung imaging technique to improve patient care.