Multidisciplinary expert opinion on the treatment consensus for patients with EGFR mutated NSCLC with brain metastases

Executive summary of the American Radium Society appropriate use criteria for brain metastases in epidermal growth factor receptor mutated-mutated and ALK-fusion non-small cell lung cancer

The American Radium Society (ARS) Central Nervous System (CNS) committee reviewed literature on epidermal growth factor receptor mutated (EGFRm) and ALK-fusion (ALK+) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for the treatment of brain metastases (BrMs) from non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) to generate appropriate use guidelines addressing use of TKIs in conjunction with or in lieu of radiotherapy (RT). The panel developed three key questions to guide systematic review: can radiotherapy be deferred in patients receiving EGFR or ALK TKIs at (1) diagnosis or (2) recurrence? Should TKI be administered concurrently with RT (3)? Two literature searches were performed (May 2019 and December 2023). The panel developed 8 model cases and voted on treatment options using a 9-point scale, with 1-3, 4-6 and 7-9 corresponding to usually not appropriate, may be appropriate, and usually appropriate (respectively), per the UCLA/RAND Appropriateness Method. Consensus was achieved in only 4 treatment scenarios, all consistent with existing ARS-AUC guidelines for multiple BrM. The panel did not reach consensus that RT can be appropriately deferred in patients with BrM receiving CNS penetrant ALK or EGFR TKIs, though median scores indicated deferral may be appropriate under most circumstances. Whole brain RT with concurrent TKI generated broad disagreement except in cases with 2-4 BrM, where it was considered usually not appropriate. We identified no definitive studies dictating optimal sequencing of TKIs and RT for EGFRm and ALK+ BrM. Until such studies are completed, the committee hopes these cases guide decision- making in this complex clinical space.

Prognostic value of cell-free DNA in cerebrospinal fluid from lung cancer patients with brain metastases during radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

During the last decades, radiotherapy (RT) for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with brain metastases (BM) has been developed. However, the lack of predictive biomarkers for therapeutic responses has limited the precision treatment in NSCLC-BM.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In order to find the predictive biomarkers for RT, we investigated the influence of RT on the cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and the frequency of T cell subsets of NSCLC patients with BM. A total of 19 patients diagnosed as NSCLC with BM were enrolled. The CSF from 19 patients and matched plasma samples from 11 patients were collected before RT, during RT, and after RT. The cfDNA from CSF and plasma were extracted, and the cerebrospinal fluid tumor mutation burden (cTMB) was calculated after through next-generation sequencing. The frequency of T cell subsets in peripheral blood was using flow cytometry.

RESULTS

The detection rate of cfDNA was higher in CSF compared to plasma in the matched samples. The mutation abundance of cfDNA in CSF was decreased after RT. However, no significant difference was observed in cTMB before and after RT. Although the median intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS) has not yet been reached in patients with decreased or undetectable cTMB, there was a trend that these patients possessed longer iPFS compared to those with stable or increased cTMB (HR 0.28, 95% CI 0.07-1.18, P = 0.067). The proportion of CD4⁺T cells in peripheral blood was decreased after RT.

CONCLUSION

Our study indicates that cTMB can serve as a prognostic biomarker in NSCLC patients with BMs.

Prognostic model of long-term advanced stage (IIIB-IV) EGFR mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) survivors using real-life data

BACKGROUND

There is a lack of useful diagnostic tools to identify EGFR mutated NSCLC patients with long-term survival. This study develops a prognostic model using real world data to assist clinicians to predict survival beyond 24 months.

METHODS

EGFR mutated stage IIIB and IV NSCLC patients diagnosed between January 2009 and December 2017 included in the Spanish Lung Cancer Group (SLCG) thoracic tumor registry. Long-term survival was defined as being alive 24 months after diagnosis. A multivariable prognostic model was carried out using binary logistic regression and internal validation through bootstrapping. A nomogram was developed to facilitate the interpretation and applicability of the model.

RESULTS

505 of the 961 EGFR mutated patients identified in the registry were included, with a median survival of 27.73 months. Factors associated with overall survival longer than 24 months were: being a woman (OR 1.78); absence of the exon 20 insertion mutation (OR 2.77); functional status (ECOG 0-1) (OR 4.92); absence of central nervous system metastases (OR 2.22), absence of liver metastases (OR 1.90) or adrenal involvement (OR 2.35) and low number of metastatic sites (OR 1.22). The model had a good internal validation with a calibration slope equal to 0.781 and discrimination (optimism corrected C-index 0.680).

CONCLUSIONS

Survival greater than 24 months can be predicted from six pre-treatment clinicopathological variables. The model has a good discrimination ability. We hypothesized that this model could help the selection of the best treatment sequence in EGFR mutation NSCLC patients.

Evaluation of the reporting quality of clinical practice guidelines on lung cancer using the RIGHT checklist

BACKGROUND

In recent years, the number of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for lung cancer has increased, but the quality of these guidelines has not been systematically assessed so far. Our aim was to assess the reporting quality of CPGs on lung cancer published since 2018 using the International Reporting Items for Practice Guidelines in Health Care (RIGHT) instrument.

METHODS

We systematically searched the major electronic literature databases, guideline databases and medical society websites from January 2018 to November 2020 to identify all CPGs for small cell and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The search and extraction were completed using standardized forms. The quality of included guidelines was evaluated using the RIGHT statement. We present the results descriptively, including a stratification by selected determinants.

RESULTS

A total of 49 CPGs were included. The mean proportion across the guidelines of the 22 items of the RIGHT checklist that were appropriately reported was 57.9%. The items most common to be poorly reported were quality assurance (item 17) and description of the role of funders (item 18b), both of which were reported in only one guideline. The proportions of items within each of the seven domains of the RIGHT checklist that were correctly reported were Basic information 75.9%; background 83.2%; evidence 44.5%; recommendations 55.4%; review and quality assurance 12.2%; funding and declaration and management of interests 42.9%; and other information 38.1%. The reporting quality of guidelines did not differ between publication years. CPGs published in journals with impact factor >30 tended to be best reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results revealed that reporting in CPGs for lung cancer is suboptimal. Particularly the declaration of funding and quality assurance are poorly reported in recent CPGs on lung cancer.

Consistency of recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

To systematically assess the consistency of recommendations regarding diagnosis and treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in clinical practice guidelines (CPGs).

METHODS

We systematically searched relevant literature databases and websites to identify CPGs related to NSCLC. We extracted the general characteristics of the included guidelines and their recommendations and descriptively compared and analyzed the consistency of recommendations across the guidelines.

RESULTS

A total of 28 NSCLC guidelines were retrieved. The recommendations covered mainly diagnosis and treatment. The recommendations in the guidelines differed substantially in various topics, such as the application of positron emission tomography (PET) and the classification of stage III. Fourteen guidelines divided stage III into two types: operable and inoperable; and the remaining 14 guidelines into three sub-stages IIIA, IIIB and IIIC. Recommendations regarding the treatment in stage III were relatively inconsistent. In driver gene (EGFR, ALK, ROS1) positive patients, targeted therapy was the most common recommendation for first-line treatment, but recommendations regarding second-line treatment varied according to the site of the mutation. In driver gene negative patients, immunotherapy was the most frequently recommended option as both first- and second-line treatment, followed by chemotherapy.

DISCUSSION

A number of countries are devoting themselves to develop NSCLC guidelines and the process of updating guidelines is accelerating, yet recommendations between guidelines are not consistent. We adopted a systematic review method to systematically search and analyze the NSCLC guidelines worldwide. We objectively reviewed the differences in recommendations for NSCLC diagnosis and treatment between the guidelines. Inconsistency of recommendations across guidelines can result from multiple potential reasons. Such as, the guidelines developed time, different countries and regions and many more. Poor consistency across CPGs can confuse the guideline users, and we therefore advocate paying more attention to examining the controversies and updating guidelines timely to improve the consistency among CPGs. Our study had also several limitations, we limited the search to CPGs published in Chinese or English, the interpretation of recommendations is inherently subjective, we did not evaluate the details of the clinical content of the CPG recommendations. Our research presents the current status of NSCLC guidelines worldwide and give the opportunity to pay more attention to the existing gaps. Further investigations should determine the reasons for inconsistency, the implications for recommendation development, and the role of synthesis across recommendations for optimal guidance of clinical care treatment. With the continuous revision and update of the guidelines, we are confident that future guidelines will be formulated with higher quality to form clear, definite and consistent recommendations for NSCLC diagnosis and treatment.

E2F1-mediated repression of WNT5A expression promotes brain metastasis dependent on the ERK1/2 pathway in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer

Brain metastasis (BM) is associated with poor prognosis in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation reportedly enhances the development of BM. However, the exact mechanism of how EGFR-mutant NSCLC contributes to BM remains unknown. Herein, we found the protein WNT5A, was significantly downregulated in BM tissues and EGFR-mutant samples. In addition, the overexpression of WNT5A inhibited the growth, migration, and invasion of EGFR-mutant cells in vitro and retarded tumor growth and metastasis in vivo compared with the EGFR wide-type cells. We demonstrated a molecular mechanism whereby WNT5A be negatively regulated by transcription factor E2F1, and ERK1/2 inhibitor (U0126) suppressed E2F1's regulation of WNT5A expression in EGFR-mutant cells. Furthermore, WNT5A inhibited β-catenin activity and the transcriptional levels of its downstream genes in cancer progression. Our research revealed the role of WNT5A in NSCLC BM with EGFR mutation, and proved that E2F1-mediated repression of WNT5A was dependent on the ERK1/2 pathway, supporting the notion that targeting the ERK1/2-E2F1-WNT5A pathway could be an effective strategy for treating BM in EGFR-mutant NSCLC.

Treatment Patterns and Survival Outcomes of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Initially Diagnosed With Brain Metastases in Real-World Clinical Practice

Background

This study aimed to comprehensively analyze the characteristics, treatment patterns, and survival outcomes of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients initially diagnosed with brain metastases (BMs) in real-world practice.

Methods

We enrolled NSCLC patients initially diagnosed with BMs between Jan 2004 and Jan 2018 in our institution. Patient demographics, treatment modalities, and survival outcomes were then analyzed. Brain localized treatment (BLT) included early brain radiotherapy (EBR), deferred brain radiotherapy (DBR), and surgery.

Results

A total of 954 patients were identified. Concerning initial treatment, 525 patients (55.0%) received systemic medication (SM)+BLT, 400 patients (41.9%) received SM only, and 29 patients received BLT only (3.0%). SM+BLT cohort was associated with longer median overall survival (mOS) than the SM only and the BLT only cohorts both in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)/anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-negative/unknown patients (15.3 months, 95% confidence interval [CI], 14.2–16.4; 11.1 months, 9.0–13.2; 7.0 months, 5.4–8.6; p<0.001) and in EGFR/ALK-positive patients (33.7 months, 28.5–38.9; 22.1 months, 17.8–26.4; 4.0 months, 3.6–4.4; p < 0.001). As for timing of radiotherapy, SM+EBR (14.1 months, 12.7–15.5) was associated with inferior mOS than SM+DBR (19.4 months, 14.2–24.6) in EGFR/ALK-negative/unknown patients. No significant difference was found in EGFR/ALK-positive patients (28.3 months, 19.1–37.5; 33.3 months, 28.1–38.5). Patients in the EGFR/ALK-negative/unknown cohort treated with first-line pemetrexed with platinum (PP) (15.8 months, 14.0–17.6, p<0.001) had longer mOS than those received non-PP regimens (13.1 months, 11.6–14.6). However, no difference was observed among EGFR/ALK-positive patients who were treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) (29.5 months, 21.1–37.9; p = 0.140), PP (27.2 months, 21.6–32.8) and non-PP regimens (25.0 months, 16.0–34.0).

Conclusions

Our study confirmed that the use of SM+BLT is associated with superior mOS than those treated with SM only and BLT only. SM+DBR might be a better radiotherapeutic strategy for this patient population. EGFR/ALK-negative/unknown patients showed a survival benefit with PP treatment.

Death Anxiety in Patients With Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer With and Without Brain Metastases

CONTEXT

Death anxiety is common in patients with metastatic cancer, but its relationship to brain metastases and cognitive decline is unknown. Early identification of death anxiety and its determinants allows proactive interventions to be offered to those in need.

OBJECTIVES

To identify psychological, physical, and disease-related (including brain metastases and cognitive impairment) factors associated with death anxiety in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) patients.

METHODS

A cross-sectional pilot study with mNSCLC outpatients completing standardized neuropsychological tests and validated questionnaires measuring death anxiety, cognitive concerns, illness intrusiveness, depression, demoralization, self-esteem, and common cancer symptoms. We constructed a composite for objective cognitive function (mean neuropsychological tests z-scores).

RESULTS

Study measures were completed by 78 patients (50% females; median age 62 years [range 37-82]). Median time since mNSCLC diagnosis was 11 months (range 0-89); 53% had brain metastases. At least moderate death anxiety was reported by 43% (n = 33). Objective cognitive impairment was present in 41% (n = 32) and perceived cognitive impairment in 27% (n = 21). Death anxiety, objective, and perceived cognitive impairment did not significantly differ between patients with and without brain metastases. In univariate analysis, death anxiety was associated with demoralization, depression, self-esteem, illness intrusiveness, common physical cancer symptoms, and perceived cognitive impairment. In multivariate analysis, demoralization (P < 0.001) and illness intrusiveness (P = 0.001) were associated with death anxiety.

CONCLUSION

Death anxiety and brain metastases are common in patients with mNSCLC but not necessarily linked. The association of death anxiety with both demoralization and illness intrusiveness highlights the importance of integrated psychological and symptom management. Further research is needed on the psychological impact of brain metastases.