The effect of liver metastasis on efficacy of immunotherapy plus chemotherapy in advanced lung cancer

Evolving landscape of treatments targeting the microenvironment of liver metastases in non-small cell lung cancer

ABSTRACT

Liver metastases (LMs) are common in lung cancer. Despite substantial advances in diagnosis and treatment, the survival rate of patients with LM remains low as the immune-suppressive microenvironment of the liver allows tumor cells to evade the immune system. The impact of LMs on the outcomes of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with solid tumors has been the main focus of recent translational and clinical research. Growing evidence indicates that the hepatic microenvironment delivers paracrine and autocrine signals from non-parenchymal and parenchymal cells. Overall, these microenvironments create pre- and post-metastatic conditions for the progression of LMs. Herein, we reviewed the epidemiology, physiology, pathology and immunology, of LMs associated with non-small cell lung cancer and the role and potential targets of the liver microenvironment in LM in each phase of metastasis. Additionally, we reviewed the current treatment strategies and challenges that should be overcome in preclinical and clinical investigations. These approaches target liver elements as the basis for future clinical trials, including combinatorial interventions reported to resolve hepatic immune suppression, such as immunotherapy plus chemotherapy, immunotherapy plus radiotherapy, immunotherapy plus anti-angiogenesis therapy, and surgical resection.

Evaluation of markers of immunity in different metastatic immune microenvironments suggests more suppression within breast to liver metastases in breast cancer

PURPOSE

Programmed death receptor ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression and tumor mutational burden (TMB) are approved screening biomarkers for immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) in advanced triple negative breast cancer. We examined these biomarkers along with characterization of the tumor microenvironment (TME) between breast tumors (BrTs), axillary metastases (AxMs), liver metastases (LvMs), non-axillary lymph node metastases, and non-liver metastases to determine differences related to site of metastatic disease.

METHODS

3076 unpaired biopsies from breast cancer patients were analyzed using whole transcriptome sequencing and NextGen DNA depicting TMB within tumor sites. The PD-L1 positivity was determined with VENTANA PD-L1 (SP142) assay. The immune cell fraction within the TME was calculated by QuantiSeq and MCP-counter.

RESULTS

Compared to BrT, more LvM samples had a high TMB (≥ 10 mutations/Mb) and fewer LvM samples had PD-L1+ expression. Evaluation of the TME revealed that LvM sites harbored lower infiltration of adaptive immune cells, such as CD4+, CD8+, and regulatory T-cells compared with the BrT foci. We saw differences in innate immune cell infiltration in LvM compared to BrT, including neutrophils and NK cells.

CONCLUSIONS

LvMs are less likely to express PD-L1+ tumor cells but more likely to harbor high TMB as compared to BrTs. Unlike AxMs, LvMs represent a more immunosuppressed TME and demonstrate lower gene expression associated with adaptive immunity compared to BrTs. These findings suggest biopsy site be considered when interpreting results that influence ICI use for treatment and further investigation of immune composition and biomarkers expression by metastatic site.

Progress of immune checkpoint inhibitors therapy for non-small cell lung cancer with liver metastases

Nearly one-fifth of patients with non-small cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) will develop liver metastases (LMs), and the overall treatment strategy of LMs will directly affect the survival of patients. However, some retrospective studies have found that patients receiving chemotherapy or targeted therapy have a poorer prognosis once LMs develop. In recent years, multiple randomised controlled trials (RCTS) have shown significant improvements in outcomes for patients with advanced lung cancer following the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) compared to conventional chemotherapy. ICIs is safe and effective in patients with LMs, although patients with LMs are mostly underrepresented in randomised clinical trials. However, NSCLC patients with LMs have a significantly worse prognosis than those without LMs when treated with ICIs, and the mechanism by which LMs induce systemic anti-tumour immunity reduction is unknown, so the management of LMs in patients with NSCLC is a clinical challenge that requires more optimised therapies to achieve effective disease control. In this review, we summarised the mechanism of ICIs in the treatment of LMs, the clinical research and treatment progress of ICIs and their combination with other therapies in patients with LMs from NSCLC.

The DC-T cell axis is an effective target for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer

The dendritic cell (DC)-T cell axis is a bridge that connects innate and adaptive immunities. The initial immune response against tumors is mainly induced by mature antigen-presenting DCs. Enhancing the crosstalk between DCs and T cells may be an effective approach to improve the immune response to non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In this article, a review was made of the interaction between DCs and T cells in the treatment of NSCLC and how this interaction affects the treatment outcome.

Organ-specific immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment in lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Based on the acknowledged organ-specific immune microenvironment, little is known regarding the efficacy of immunotherapy in patients with lung cancer according to metastatic sites. This meta-analysis aimed to explore the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) vs chemotherapy in patients with lung cancer with liver metastases (LM) or brain metastases (BM).

DESIGN

Meta-analysis and systematic review.

DATA SOURCES

We systematically searched in electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Web of Science), up to 31 January 2022. We also reviewed the abstracts from major international conferences. Eligibility criteria were randomised controlled phase II or III trials reporting the overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS) of LM or BM subsets.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs for OS and PFS were extracted and aggregated using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Twenty-four randomised controlled trials with available outcomes for patients with BMs or LMs were identified. A total of 1124 patients with BM and 2077 patients with LM were included in the analysis. The pooled OS HR of patients with LMs was 0.83 (95% CI 0.72 to 0.95), and that of patients without LM 0.73 (95% CI 0.69 to 0.79). LM was associated with less benefits from ICIs. In patients with BM treated with ICIs, the pooled OS HR compared with the control arms was 0.71 (95% CI 0.53 to 0.94). Subgroup analyses by histology suggested that only patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with BM could gain benefit from ICIs (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.68). BM negatively influenced efficacy of immunotherapy in patients with small cell lung cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results showed immunotherapy demonstrated efficacy in patients with lung cancer with LM and BM, survival benefits dominantly favoured patients with NSCLC. Patients with lung cancer with LM obtained less benefits from ICIs than those without. Therefore, organ-specific immunotherapeutic approaches should be considered.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42020212797.

Efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 plus CTLA-4 inhibitors in solid tumors based on clinical characteristics: a meta-analysis

Aims: To clarify the relationship between the potency of dual blockade of PD-1 or its ligand (PD-L1) plus CTLA-4 and patients with different clinical characteristics with solid tumors, the authors performed this meta-analysis. Patients & methods: 12 randomized clinical trials containing 7056 patients were included after the literature was filtered. Results: Dual blockade substantially enhanced overall survival and progression-free survival compared with standard of care, especially in patients aged <65 years old, those 65-74 years old, those with a smoking history, members of the White population and those with a high tumor mutation burden. Conclusion: Dual blockade therapy significantly improved patient survival outcomes. Age, smoking history, race and tumor mutation burden might be used to predict the potency of dual blockade therapy in solid tumors.

Liver metastases and the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Liver metastasis is the most common type of lung cancer metastasis, and is a significant prognostic factor in lung cancer. However, the effect of liver metastases on the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) remains inconsistent and controversial. The aim of this study was to explore the relationship between liver metastases and ICI efficacy in patients with advanced lung cancer based on data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies.

Methods

PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library databases, conference proceedings, as well as grey literature websites were searched for eligible studies without language restrict ion. Study quality was assessed using Cochrane tools and the Newcastle–Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale (NOS). Outcomes of interest were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The difference in efficacy between patients with and without liver metastases was calculated by pooling ratios of hazard ratios (HR), as calculated using the deft approach.

Results

A total of 16 RCTs and 14 observational trials were included. Analyses of RCTs revealed a survival benefit for ICI treatment (i.e., ICI monotherapy, ICI + Chemotherapy, dual ICI therapy and dual ICI + Chemotherapy) versus standard therapies among non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with liver metastases (PFS HR, 0.77; 95%CI, 0.61–0.97; OS HR, 0.78; 95%CI, 0.68–0.90). NSCLC patients with liver metastases achieved less PFS benefit and comparable OS benefit from ICI treatment compared with those without liver metastases (ratios of PFS–HRs, 1.19; 95%CI, 1.02–1.39; P=0.029; Ratios of OS–HRs, 1.10; 95%CI, 0.94–1.29; P=0.24). For patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC), ICI treatment achieved a marginal effect on patients with liver metastases as compared with standard therapies (OS HR, 0.94; 95%CI, 0.73–1.23). SCLC patients with liver metastases benefited less from ICI treatment than patients without liver metastases (ratio of OS–HRs, 1.22; 95%CI, 1.01–1.46; P=0.036). In real-world data analysis, liver metastasis could be used as an independent prognostic risk factor, increasing the risk of death by 21% in lung cancer patients receiving ICI treatment compared with those without liver metastases (OS HR, 1.21; 95%CI, 1.17–1.27; P<0.0001). Subgroup analysis confirmed that this association was not modified by race (Asian vs. Western) or number of treatment lines.

Conclusions

The presence of liver metastases does not significantly influence the OS benefit of ICIs in patients with NSCLC. However, a small amount of data shows that liver metastasis restrains the magnitude of OS benefit in patients with SCLC. Liver metastasis has potential as an independent prognostic risk factor for lung cancer patients receiving ICI treatment in clinical practice.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier (CRD42022306449).

The Efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors in Patients with Liver Metastasis of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Real-World Study

BACKGROUND

A controversy exists regarding the efficacy of programmed death-1 (PD-1)/ programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) inhibitors for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and liver metastases. Our study retrospectively evaluated the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in NSCLC patients with liver metastases.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 1627 lung cancer patients who received immunotherapy. Among 648 patients who had advanced NSCLC and received PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, 61 had liver metastases and 587 did not have. We analyzed patient characteristics, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). An exploratory analysis of biomarkers including CD4, CD8 and CD68 for efficacy in patients with liver metastases was also performed.

RESULTS

In liver metastasis patients receiving PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, the objective response rate (ORR) was 29.5%, the disease control rate (DCR) was 72.1%, PFS was 6.4 months and OS was 15.2 months, which were all worse than those of patients without liver metastases (ORR: 35.8%; DCR: 81.8%; PFS: 7.9 months, p = 0.001; OS: 20.6 months, p = 0.008). When compared to non-liver lesions, the ORR (26.2 vs. 39.3%) and DCR (75.4 vs. 88.5%) of liver lesions were lower. During the analysis of PD-L1 expression, 27 PD-L1-positive patients had a longer PFS than 21 patients in the negative group (p = 0.012). Being PD-L1 positive was the independent prognostic indicators for PFS (p = 0.006). Additionally, the PD-L1 and CD8 dual-positive group responded favorably to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors.

CONCLUSIONS

PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors are effective in liver metastasis-NSCLC patients. However, the efficacy is inferior when compared to those of patients without liver metastases. In NSCLC patients with liver metastases, PD-L1 expression and CD8+ T cell infiltration can predict the response of PD-1/PD-L1-directed immunotherapy.

Research Progress on the Microenvironment and Immunotherapy of Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer With Liver Metastases

Lung cancer is a malignant tumor with the highest morbidity and mortality, and more than 75% of patients are diagnosed at an advanced stage. Liver metastases occur in 20% of non-small cell lung cancer patients, and their prognosis are poor. In recent years, immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy and combination therapy have made breakthrough progress in advanced Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. However, compared with the overall population, the liver metastases population was an independent prognostic factor for poor immunotherapy response. Whether and how immunotherapy can work in NSCLC patients with liver metastases is a major and unresolved challenge. Although more and more data have been disclosed, the research progress of NSCLC liver metastasis is still limited. How liver metastasis modulates systemic antitumor immunity and the drug resistance mechanisms of the liver immune microenvironment have not been elucidated. We systematically focused on non-small cell lung cancer patients with liver metastases, reviewed and summarized their pathophysiological mechanisms, immune microenvironment characteristics, and optimization of immunotherapy strategies.

Organ-specific efficacy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with first-line single-agent immune checkpoint inhibitors

Background:

Methods:

Results:

Conclusions:

Efficacy of Atezolizumab for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Based on Clinical and Molecular Features: A Meta-Analysis

Objective

Atezolizumab is becoming a significant therapy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but its efficacy needs to be further improved. The aims of this study are to clarify the potency of atezolizumab-based therapy in advanced NSCLC patients with different clinical and molecular features, and to choose a better therapeutic regimen of atezolizumab to achieve more precise treatment in immunotherapy.

Methods

Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) in the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase Science Direct, and Google Scholar, together with major oncology conferences that compared atezolizumab with chemotherapy-based treatment for individuals with advanced NSCLC published prior to February 2022, were searched. Studies, bias risk assessment, and data extraction were selected by two independent authors. We extracted the basic features of the included studies, together with the 95% confidence interval (CI) and hazard ratios (HRs), from all patients and subgroups. The combined treatment data were assessed using the inverse variance weighting method.

Results

Seven RCTs including 4,859 patients were included. Our meta-analysis findings indicated that atezolizumab substantially enhanced OS (HR 0.82; 95% CI, 0.77–0.88; p < 0.00001) and PFS (HR 0.72; 95% CI, 0.61–0.85; p < 0.0001) in patients with advanced NSCLC compared with chemotherapy-based treatment. Atezolizumab substantially enhanced OS in patients aged <65 years old and 65–74 years old, those with wild-type EGFR, those without liver metastases, active or previous smokers, white patients and those with TC3 or IC3, TC2/3 or IC2/3, TC1/2/3 or IC1/2/3, and TC0 and IC0, but not in patients aged ≥75 years, never smokers, those with liver metastases, those with EGFR mutant, Asians, Black or African Americans, or those with TC1/2 or IC1/2. Patients with advanced NSCLC who received atezolizumab showed OS improvement regardless of sex (male or female), histological type (non-squamous or squamous NSCLC), performance status (0 or 1), and line of treatment (1st-line therapy or ≥2nd-line therapy). Subgroup analysis revealed that male individuals, those with non-squamous NSCLC, those with PS 1, active or previous smokers, and those with wild-type EGFR, TC3 or IC3, and TC1/2/3 or IC1/2/3 achieved OS benefit from atezolizumab treatment not related to the treatment line and treatment regimen.

Conclusions

Age group, smoking history, liver metastasis status, EGFR mutation status, race, and PD-L1 expression can be used to predict the potency of atezolizumab and provide a better treatment regimen for patients with advanced NSCLC to achieve accurate and personalized treatment.

Effect of smoking habits on the efficacy of EGFR-TKI plus anti-angiogenic agent in advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC

BACKGROUND

The types of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who could obtain significant clinical benefit from the dual inhibition of EGFR/vascular EGFR (VEGFR) pathways remain unclear. No consensus has been reached on the significance of smoking habits in clinical benefit obtained from EGFR-TKI plus anti-angiogenic agents.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases for all phase II/III randomized clinical trials (RCTs) investigating the efficacy of EGFR-TKI combined with anti-angiogenic agents stratified by smoking habits (updated October 2021) were searched systematically. The primary outcomes were the pooled HRs for PFS/OS in smokers and non-smokers, and differences in efficacy of EGFR-TKI plus anti-angiogenic treatment between smokers and non-smokers, measured by difference in PFS and OS.

RESULTS

Seven phase II/III RCTs involving 1452 patients were identified. The pooled analysis demonstrated that EGFR-TKI plus anti-angiogenic agent could decrease the risk of progression by 40% (HR, 0.60; 95%CI 0.48-0.75) in smokers when compared with EGFR-TKI alone, but not in non-smokers (HR, 0.92; 95%CI 0.68-1.25). The comparison analysis further demonstrated that EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients who smoked obtained greater progression-free survival (PFS) benefit from treatment with EGFR-TKI plus anti-angiogenic agents (HR, 0.68; 95%CI 0.51-0.91). Consistent with the results for PFS, smokers receiving EGFR-TKI plus anti-angiogenic agents appeared to exhibit better overall survival (OS) than non-smokers but not to a statistically significant degree (HR, 0.60; 95%CI 0.23-1.52). Meta-regression analysis revealed no significant effect of the line of treatment (P = 0.52), trial phase (P = 0.52), EGFR-TKI type (P = 0.13), or anti-angiogenic agent type (P = 0.50) on PFS effect sizes under multivariate models.

CONCLUSION

Comprehensive analysis suggested that EGFR-TKI plus anti-angiogenic agents led to favorable PFS among smoking EGFR-mutant patients, comparable to nonsmokers, which might provide a useful guide for clinicians.

Organ-specific metastatic landscape dissects PD-(L)1 blockade efficacy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: applicability from clinical trials to real-world practice

BACKGROUND

Organ-specific metastatic context has not been incorporated into the clinical practice of guiding programmed death-(ligand) 1 [PD-(L)1] blockade, due to a lack of understanding of its predictive versus prognostic value. We aim at delineating and then incorporating both the predictive and prognostic effects of the metastatic-organ landscape to dissect PD-(L)1 blockade efficacy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

A total of 2062 NSCLC patients from a double-arm randomized trial (OAK), two immunotherapy trials (FIR, BIRCH), and a real-world cohort (NFyy) were included. The metastatic organs were stratified into two categories based on their treatment-dependent predictive significance versus treatment-independent prognosis. A metastasis-based scoring system (METscore) was developed and validated for guiding PD-(L)1 blockade in clinical trials and real-world practice.

RESULTS

Patients harboring various organ-specific metastases presented significantly different responses to immunotherapy, and those with brain and adrenal gland metastases survived longer than others [overall survival (OS), p = 0.0105; progression-free survival (PFS), p = 0.0167]. In contrast, survival outcomes were similar in chemotherapy-treated patients regardless of metastatic sites (OS, p = 0.3742; PFS, p = 0.8242). Intriguingly, the immunotherapeutic predictive significance of the metastatic-organ landscape was specifically presented in PD-L1-positive populations (PD-L1 > 1%). Among them, a paradoxical coexistence of a favorable predictive effect coupled with an unfavorable prognostic effect was observed in metastases to adrenal glands, brain, and liver (category I organs), whereas metastases to bone, pleura, pleural effusion, and mediastinum yielded consistent unfavorable predictive and prognostic effects (category II organs). METscore was capable of integrating both predictive and prognostic effects of the entire landscape and dissected OS outcome of NSCLC patients received PD-(L)1 blockade (p < 0.0001) but not chemotherapy (p = 0.0805) in the OAK training cohort. Meanwhile, general performance of METscore was first validated in FIR (p = 0.0350) and BIRCH (p < 0.0001), and then in the real-world NFyy cohort (p = 0.0181). Notably, METscore was also applicable to patients received PD-(L)1 blockade as first-line treatment both in the clinical trials (OS, p = 0.0087; PFS, p = 0.0290) and in the real-world practice (OS, p = 0.0182; PFS, p = 0.0045).

CONCLUSIONS

Organ-specific metastatic landscape served as a potential predictor of immunotherapy, and METscore might enable noninvasive forecast of PD-(L)1 blockade efficacy using baseline radiologic assessments in advanced NSCLC.

Frontline anti-PD-1/PD-L1 versus bevacizumab in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a network meta-analysis

Aim: To review the efficacy and safety of regimens containing anti-PD-1/PD-L1 and bevacizumab for patients with advanced nonsquamous, non-small-cell lung cancer. Methods: Sixteen eligible trials were assessed. Clinical outcomes and adverse events were integrated. Subgroup analysis was conducted according to PD-L1 expression and liver metastases. Results: For the PD-L1 high population, a PD-1 inhibitor plus platinum-doublet provided significant progression-free survival (PFS) benefit versus bevacizumab. While for patients harboring PD-L1 <50%, anti-PD-1/PD-L1-containing regimens performed comparably to bevacizumab. With regard to the liver metastatic population, there existed a trend that anti-PD-1 plus chemotherapy brought about PFS benefits. Conclusion: The preference for chemoimmunotherapy lacks sufficient evidence in patients harboring PD-L1 <50%. Direct head-to-head clinical trials are warranted to identify optimal therapeutic regimens for specific patients.

Clinical Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Non-small-cell Lung Cancer Patients with Liver Metastases: A Network Meta-Analysis of Nine Randomized Controlled Trials

Purpose

This network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted to compare the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with liver metastases.

Materials and Methods

English literature was retrieved from the PubMed, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), and European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) databases from January 2015 to January 2021. We pooled the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) hazard ratios (HRs) using a network meta-analysis and ranked treatments by the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). Publication bias was evaluated by Begg's and Egger's tests. STATA15.0 was used for the sensitivity analysis, and the remaining statistical analyses were performed using R 4.0.2.

Results

Nine eligible phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included, including 1,141 patients with liver metastases. Pembrolizumab + chemotherapy ranked highest, followed by atezolizumab + bevacizumab + chemotherapy and nivolumab. However, no significant difference in OS rates was observed across these three treatments (HR, 0.98; 95% CI: 0.43-2.22 for pembrolizumab + chemotherapy vs. atezolizumab + bevacizumab + chemotherapy; HR, 0.91; 95% CI: 0.52-1.57 for pembrolizumab + chemotherapy vs. nivolumab). Regarding the PFS rate, atezolizumab + bevacizumab + chemotherapy and pembrolizumab + chemotherapy ranked highest and no significant difference was observed between them (HR, 0.79; 95% CI: 0.36-1.70 for atezolizumab + bevacizumab + chemotherapy vs. pembrolizumab + chemotherapy).

Conclusion

Pembrolizumab + chemotherapy, atezolizumab + bevacizumab + chemotherapy, and nivolumab were superior to other treatments in NSCLC patients with liver metastases. These new findings may help clinicians better select therapeutic strategies for NSCLC patients with liver metastases.

FGF9/FGFR1 promotes cell proliferation, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, M2 macrophage infiltration and liver metastasis of lung cancer

•

FGF9 induced cell proliferation, EMT, migration, and invasion of mouse Lewis lung cancer (LLC) cells, in vitro.

•

FGF9 interacted with FGFR1 and activated FAK, AKT, and ERK/MAPK signal pathways, induced the expression of EMT key proteins (N-cadherin, vimentin, snail, MMP2, MMP3 and MMP13) and reduced the expression of E-cadherin.

•

FGF9 promoted liver metastasis of subcutaneous inoculated LLC tumor with tumor growth, angiogenesis, EMT and M2-macrophage infiltration in the tumor microenvironment.

•

The FGF9/LLC syngeneic animal model provides a useful tool for the mechanism studies of liver metastasis which is the worst prognostic factor for lung cancer patients with distant organ metastasis.

Fibroblast growth factors 9 (FGF9) modulates cell proliferation, differentiation and motility for development and repair in normal cells. Abnormal activation of FGF9 signaling is associated with tumor progression in many cancers. Also, FGF9 may be an unfavorable prognostic indicator for non-small cell lung cancer patients. However, the effects and mechanisms of FGF9 in lung cancer remain elusive. In this study, we investigated the FGF9-induced effects and signal activation profiles in mouse Lewis lung carcinoma (LLC) in vitro and in vivo. Our results demonstrated that FGF9 significantly induced cell proliferation and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) phenomena (migration and invasion) in LLC cells. Mechanism-wise, FGF9 interacted with FGFR1 and activated FAK, AKT, and ERK/MAPK signal pathways, induced the expression of EMT key proteins (N-cadherin, vimentin, snail, MMP2, MMP3 and MMP13), and reduced the expression of E-cadherin. Moreover, in the allograft mouse model, intratumor injection of FGF9 to LLC-tumor bearing C57BL/6 mice enhanced LLC tumor growth which were the results of increased Ki67 expression and decreased cleaved caspase-3 expression compared to control groups. Furthermore, we have a novel finding that FGF9 promoted liver metastasis of subcutaneous inoculated LLC tumor with angiogenesis, EMT and M2-macrophage infiltration in the tumor microenvironment. In conclusion, FGF9 activated FAK, AKT, and ERK signaling through FGFR1 with induction of EMT to stimulate LLC tumorigenesis and hepatic metastasis. This novel FGF9/LLC allograft animal model may therefore be useful to study the mechanism of liver metastasis which is the worst prognostic factor for lung cancer patients with distant organ metastasis.

Three models that predict the efficacy of immunotherapy in Chinese patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Background

Many tools have been developed to predict the efficacy of immunotherapy, such as lung immune prognostic index (LIPI), EPSILoN [Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS), smoking, liver metastases, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (NLR)], and modified lung immune predictive index (mLIPI) scores. The aim of this study was to determine the ability of three predictive scores to predict the outcomes in Chinese advanced non‐small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 429 patients with aNSCLC treated with ICIs at our institution. The predictive ability of these models was evaluated using area under the curve (AUC) in receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis. Calibration was assessed using the Hosmer–Lemeshow test (H–L test) and Spearman's correlation coefficient. Progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) curves were generated using the Kaplan–Meier method.

Results

The AUC values of LIPI, mLIPI, and EPSILoN scores predicting PFS at 6 months were 0.642 [95% confidence interval (CI):0.590–0.694], 0.720 (95% CI: 0.675–0.762), and 0.633 (95% CI: 0.585–0.679), respectively (p < 0.001 for all models). The AUC values of LIPI, mLIPI, and EPSILON scores predicting objective response rate (ORR) were 0.606 (95% CI: 0.546–0.665), 0.683 (95% CI: 0.637–0.727), and 0.666 (95% CI: 0.620–0.711), respectively (p < 0.001 for all models). The C‐indexes of LIPI, mLIPI, and EPSILoN scores for PFS were 0.627 (95% CI 0.611–6.643), 0.677 (95% CI 0.652–0.682), and 0.631 (95% CI 0.617–0.645), respectively.

Conclusions

As mLIPI scores had the highest accuracy when used to predict the outcomes in Chinese aNSCLC patients, this tool could be used to guide clinical immunotherapy decision‐making.

Effects of concomitant proton pump inhibitor use on immune checkpoint inhibitor efficacy among patients with advanced cancer

Background

The present study aimed to evaluate the effects of concomitant proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use on immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) efficacy among advanced cancer patients.

Methods and Materials

A systematic literature search of electronic database was performed to identify all potential reports. Then, meta-analyses were conducted to obtain pooled HRs with 95% CIs, which reveal the influence of PPI use on PFS and OS in patients receiving ICI treatment.

Results

A total of 7 studies with 3,647 advanced cancer patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The impact of PPI use was then evaluated on 3,340 patients for PFS and 3,647 patients for OS. Concomitant PPI use has a detrimental effect on the efficacy of ICIs that PPI use increased the risk of progression by 28% (HR = 1.28, 95% CI 1.17–1.40; I2 = 31.3%, Q test P = .21) when compared to those not receiving PPIs. Similarly, the meta-analysis showed that PPI use was also associated with shorter OS of advanced cancer patients receiving ICIs that PPI use increased risk of death by 39% (HR = 1.39, 95% CI 1.26–1.54; I2 = 36.5%, Q test P = .16). Sensitivity analysis showed that the pooled HRs were constant after excluding one study at a time, and no significant publication biases were detected.

Conclusion

The meta-analysis suggested that concomitant PPI use is significantly associated with low clinical benefit in ICI treatment, revealing a significantly reduced PFS and OS in advanced cancer patients receiving ICIs who are also exposed to PPI.

Pan-Cancer Analysis Identifies Liver Metastases as Negative Predictive Factor for Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Treatment Outcome

This study aimed to investigate the predictive value of liver metastases (LM) in patients with various advanced cancers received immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). First, clinical and survival data from a published cohort of 1,661 patients who received ICIs therapy were downloaded and analyzed. Second, a retrospective review of 182 patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy was identified. Third, a meta-analysis of published trials was performed to explore the impact of LM on the efficacy of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 based therapy in advanced lung cancers. Pan-cancer analysis revealed that patients with LM had significantly shorter overall survival (OS) than those without LM (10 vs. 20 months; P < 0.0001). Subgroup analysis showed that the presence of LM was associated with markedly shorter OS than those without LM in ICI monotherapy group (P < 0.0001), but it did not reach the statistical significance in ICI-based combination therapy (P = 0.0815). In NSCLC, the presence of LM was associated with significantly inferior treatment outcomes in both pan-cancer and real-world cohort. Interestingly, ICI-based monotherapy and combination therapy could simultaneously prolong progression-free survival (PFS) and OS than chemotherapy in patients without LM. However, ICI-based monotherapy could not prolong PFS than chemotherapy in patients with LM while ICI-based combination therapy could dramatically prolong both PFS and OS. Together, these findings suggested that the presence of LM was the negative predictive factor in cancer patients received ICIs monotherapy, especially in NSCLC. ICI-based combination therapy might overcome the intrinsic resistance of LM to ICIs while the optimal combinatorial strategies remain under further investigation.

Different prognostic implications of hepatic metastasis according to front-line treatment in non-small cell lung cancer: a real-world retrospective study

Background

Although liver metastasis occurs in approximately 15% of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with poor prognosis, its prognostic effect in patients who receive immunotherapy is unclear. This study aimed to verify the effects of liver metastasis on the prognosis of metastatic NSCLC patients according to their first-line treatment.

Methods

Patients who were initially diagnosed with stage 4 NSCLC from January 2015 to December 2019 were analyzed in this retrospective real-world data-based study. The patients were divided into three groups according to the type of first-line chemotherapy they received: cytotoxic, targeted, and immunotherapy. Prognosis was then compared depending on the presence of liver metastasis in each treatment group.

Results

Among the 1,470 patients, 723 (49.2%) received cytotoxic chemotherapy, 678 (46.1%) received targeted therapy, and 69 (4.7%) received immunotherapy as their first-line chemotherapy. A total of 234 (15.9%) patients had liver metastasis at the initial diagnosis. The mean patient age was 63.7 years, and 59.1% were male. There was no difference in overall survival (OS) in the immunotherapy group in patients with or without liver metastasis (11.7 vs. 13.0 months, P=0.968); however, patients with liver metastasis had worse outcomes in the cytotoxic and targeted therapy groups compared to patients without liver metastasis. Furthermore, in patients with liver metastasis, the immunotherapy group had a longer OS than the cytotoxic chemotherapy group (11.7 vs. 4.4 months, P<0.001). Liver metastasis was associated with poor outcomes (hazard ratio of 1.438), as were age, male sex, bone, adrenal gland, or soft tissue metastasis, and three or more metastatic sites; however, lymph node, brain, collateral lung, and pleura metastasis did not affect prognosis.

Conclusions

Although liver metastasis was associated with poor outcomes, it did not affect prognosis in patients who received immunotherapy.

Rational Design of Hyaluronic Acid-Based Copolymer-Mixed Micelle in Combination PD-L1 Immune Checkpoint Blockade for Enhanced Chemo-Immunotherapy of Melanoma

The application of combinational therapy breaks the limitation of monotherapy and achieves better clinical benefit for tumor therapy. Herein, a hyaluronic acid/Pluronic F68-based copolymer-mixed micelle was constructed for targeted delivery of chemotherapeutical agent docetaxel (PHDM) in combination with programmed cell death ligand-1(PD-L1) antibody. When PHDM+anti-PDL1 was injected into the blood system, PHDM could accumulate into tumor sites and target tumor cells via CD44-mediated endocytosis and possess tumor chemotherapy. While anti-PDL1 could target PD-L1 protein expressed on surface of tumor cells to the immune checkpoint blockade characteristic for tumor immunotherapy. This strategy could not only directly kill tumor cells but also improve CD8+ T cell level and facilitate effector cytokines release. In conclusion, the rational-designed PHDM+anti-PDL1 therapy strategy creates a new way for tumor immune-chemotherapy.

PD-L1 expression in liver metastasis: its clinical significance and discordance with primary tumor in colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

The outcomes of immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer patients with liver metastases are poor, which may be related to a different tumor microenvironment in liver metastases from primary tumors. This study was aimed to analyze PD-L1 expression and the immune microenvironment status in liver metastases and compare the differences of PD-L1 expression between primary tumors and liver metastases of colorectal cancer.

METHODS

74 cases of pathologically confirmed colorectal cancer with liver metastasis underwent resection from our hospital were included. Tissue microarrays were used for the interpretation of PD-L1 expression, cluster of differentiation 4 (CD4) and CD8 density by immunohistochemistry. We evaluated the disparity between primary tumor and liver metastasis in PD-L1 expression, CD4 and CD8 density and analyzed the factors associated with obvious PD-L1 disparity.

RESULTS

The expression of PD-L1 was positively related to the density of CD4 and CD8 in liver metastases. The expression of PD-L1 in liver metastases was higher than in primary tumors in certain subgroups, including patients with concurrent liver metastases (n = 63, p = 0.05), patients receiving concurrent resection of primary and metastatic tumors (n = 56, p = 0.04). The two subgroups generally reflected those without inconsistent external influences, such as treatment and temporal factors, between primary tumors and liver metastases. In these subgroups, the intrinsic differences of microenvironment between primary tumors and liver metastases could be identified. Furthermore, tumor differentiation [moderate vs. poor: OR = 0.23, 95% CI: 0.03-0.99, p = 0.05)] were demonstrated to be associated with obvious discordance of PD-L1 expression between primary tumors and liver metastases.

CONCLUSIONS

The expression of PD-L1 in liver metastases was higher than in primary tumors in subgroups, reflecting intrinsic microenvironment differences between primary and metastatic tumors. Obvious discordance of PD-L1 expression between primary tumor and liver metastasis was significantly related to the tumor differentiation.

Predictive and prognostic significance of M descriptors of the 8th TNM classification for advanced NSCLC patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors

Background

A strong association between M descriptors and prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been demonstrated recently. However, its predictive and prognostic significance for advanced NSCLC patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) remain unclear. In this study, we aimed at investigating the impact of M descriptors on clinical outcomes in those patients.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted. Patients treated with more than two cycles of ICIs were included. Detailed characteristics and clinical response after immunotherapy were recorded. M descriptors were classified into M1a, M1b, and M1c according to the 8th TNM classification.

Results

A total of 103 patients were enrolled, including 42 with M1a disease, 16 with M1b disease and 45 with M1c disease. Patients with M1a disease demonstrated significant longer median progress-free survival (PFS) (11.9 vs. 4.1 and 3.2 months, respectively, P=0.0002) and overall survival (OS) (35 vs. 22.1 and 12 months, P=0.02) than those with M1b and M1c disease. Patients with M1a disease showed higher objective response rate (ORR) (28.6% vs. 14.8%, P=0.08) and disease control rate (DCR) (81% vs. 59%, P=0.02) compared with those with M1b and M1c disease. Multivariate analysis identified M1a stage as being independently associated with prolonged PFS and had better OS than those with M1c disease (P=0.05) but not M1b disease (P=0.06).

Conclusions

The current study demonstrated a clear association between M descriptors and the therapeutic response to ICIs and confirmed its prognostic role in advanced patients treated with ICIs monotherapy. M descriptors may need to be stratified in future study design.

Clinical features affecting survival in metastatic NSCLC treated with immunotherapy: A critical review of published data

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) represent one of the main steps forward for the treatment of advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), without oncogenic driver alterations. Despite this recent progress, only a minority of patients achieve a broad and durable benefit and another proportion report poor survival and sometimes fast disease progression, confirming the need to optimise the patient's selection. To date, several issues are unsolved about how to personalise the immunotherapy treatment for individual patients. In this review, analysing data from pivotal randomised clinical trials (RCTs), we discuss patient baseline clinical and demographic features, including sex, age, ECOG performance status, smoking habit and specific site of metastases (liver, bone and brain) that may influence the efficacy outcomes in patients treated with ICIs. The high performance of the ICIs blurred the vision on different efficacy-limiting factors, which require extensive evaluation to improve the understanding ofthe tumour-specificimmune response, in which clinical drivers could be useful for better patient stratification.

Tumor Primary Location May Affect Metastasis Pattern for Patients with Stage IV NSCLC: A Population-Based Study

Background

Most patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were initially diagnosed with distant metastasis. At present, there is no study to clarify the correlation between the primary location of the tumor and the metastasis pattern in advanced NSCLC. So we conducted this study to explored the relationship between the tumor primary location and metastasis pattern in stage IV NSCLC.

Methods

A total of 19,295 eligible patients were identified from 2010 to 2012 in the SEER database. The main endpoint of our study was overall survival (OS). The survival curves were created by using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the usage of the Log Rank test. The clinical variable characteristics were compared by the chi-square test, and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate the risk factors on metastasis patterns. All statistical P values were two-sided, and it was considered statistically significant when P ≤ 0.05.

Results

We found that different proportions of metastatic sites could be found in different tumor primary locations. In addition, the prognosis of lung metastasis was relatively good in patients with tumor location in main bronchus (P < 0.001), upper lobe (P < 0.001), lower lobe (P < 0.001) , and middle lobe (P = 0.005). Besides, there was no significant OS difference for patients whose primary location was overlapping lesion (P = 0.226). The results also demonstrated that compared with patients with primary tumor located in the main bronchus, those in the upper lobe were more likely to have brain metastasis (P = 0.01) and lung metastasis (P = 0.024), those in the middle lobe were more prone to develop lung metastasis (P = 0.035) and those in the lower lobe were more apt to cause bone metastasis (P = 0.005) and lung metastasis (P = 0.001). In addition, there was no statistical difference in metastasis patterns among patients with overlapping lesions (P > 0.05).

Conclusions

Different primary tumor locations might affect the metastasis pattern in patients with stage IV NSCLC.

Immunotherapy as a second-line or later treatment modality for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A review of safety and efficacy

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for 80-85% of these cases. Surgical resection is the most common conventional treatment of lung cancer. For patients with advanced NSCLC, platinum-based chemotherapy remains the cornerstone of treatment. Although platinum-based chemotherapy demonstrated improved outcomes, the need for the second-line/later therapies is evident. A review was conducted to assess the safety and efficacy of immunotherapies as the second-line/later therapy of advanced NSCLC. Clinical trial data was collected via PubMed and Clinicaltrials.gov. Recent studies were selected based on prespecified inclusion/exclusion criteria. Data on the safety and efficacy of the immunotherapy was subsequently compiled from relevant trials. Monoclonal antibodies targeting PD-1/PD-L1 showed the most promising results as the second-line/later treatment modalities. Immunizations did not produce as robust of an immune response in participants; however, they warrant further research to determine their place in therapy.