Fertility counseling in women with hereditary cancer syndromes

The era of increasing cancer survivorship: Trends in fertility preservation, medico-legal implications, and ethical challenges

Introduction

Global cancer cases are increasing, but fortunately, cancer is becoming more treatable. By 2050, the number of cancer cases is projected to reach 35 million. These numbers are certainly correlated with the aging population, early diagnoses due to screenings, and the broad current treatment options. However, life-saving therapies are often gonadotoxic, significantly impacting the lives of cancer patients. Fertility preservation following life-saving oncological treatments is one of the challenges faced by patients with cancer.

Material and method

We analyzed 73 articles to investigate the current state of fertility preservation in oncology, also evaluating the medico-legal implications.

Results

The data indicate a growing trend of cancer recoveries and survivorship with opportunities to access fertility preservation through various methods, which are not entirely known or consistently offered to patients in the appropriate manner.

Conclusions

The ethical and medico-legal aspects are numerous and seem to be still evolving.

A Qualitative Exploration of Oncology Clinician's Needs for PGT-M Discussions in Clinical Practice

Purpose: Oncology clinicians are appropriately positioned to facilitate discussions of assisted reproductive technologies including preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disease (PGT-M), in the context of cancer treatment or surveillance. Yet, reproductive services, including PGT-M, remain one of the least implemented services in oncology. No studies to date have explored which practice resources the clinicians need to increase knowledge of PGT-M. The objective of this study was to explore the specific needs of oncology clinicians to help maximize the reproductive potential of young adult patients with hereditary cancers. Methods: Participants were recruited through notices circulated on social media platforms and snowball sampling. Participants completed a brief online survey to confirm eligibility. Eligible participants completed a virtual, semi-structured interview. Interviews focused on clinician experiences with PGT-M and initiating referrals to fertility specialists. Thematic analysis was conducted using a constant comparative approach to identify current clinical practices. Results: This study found that PGT-M discussions are not necessarily within the scope of responsibilities for oncology clinicians owing to prioritization of cancer treatment and overall lack of knowledge. Participants need accessible resources and timely support for reproductive planning in the context of cancer treatment. Participants desire a streamlined referral pathway to professionals trained in oncofertility to help address their patient's reproductive needs. Conclusion: Our study identified that educational and referral resources to reproductive specialists are needed to maximize reproductive potential across the cancer continuum. These findings provide a foundation for larger studies that can inform standard-of-care recommendations in the emerging field of oncofertility.

An update on oncofertility in prepubertal females

Cancer is a life-threatening event for pediatric patients. Treatment advancements in pediatric cancer have improved prognosis, but some of these treatments have gonadotoxic potential and may affect fertility in different ways. Due to the growing interest of the research community in the life prospects of young cancer survivors, there has been a demand to intersect reproductive medicine and oncology, which is referred to as "oncofertility". There are various fertility preservation options according to gender and pubertal status, and shared decisions must take place at the time of diagnosis. This study aims to provide a critical review of current and emerging strategies for preserving and restoring fertility in prepubertal females, ranging from established methods to experimental approaches that can be offered before, during, and after anticancer therapies. Additionally, the author aims to review how clinicians' awareness of oncofertility options and the latest advancements in this field, timely referral, and proper consultations with patients and their families are vital in addressing their concerns, providing emotional support, and guiding them through the decision-making process, as well as potential barriers that may hinder the fertility preservation process.

Experiences and intentions of patients undergoing medically indicated oocyte or embryo cryopreservation: a qualitative study

STUDY QUESTION

What structural (logistical) and psychological challenges do patients who cryopreserve oocytes or embryos for medical reasons face, including possible barriers to using their frozen materials?

SUMMARY ANSWER

The majority of women who underwent oocyte or embryo cryopreservation for medical reasons reported a desire to use their frozen oocytes or embryos but had been impeded by ongoing medical issues, the need for a gestational carrier, or the lack of a partner.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Current data suggest that many women who have frozen oocytes or embryos for medical indications are concerned about the prospect of infertility and have unique emotional and financial needs that differ from patients with infertility. Further, most patients have not returned to use their cryopreserved materials.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

This is a qualitative interview study of 42 people who cryopreserved between January 2012 and December 2021. Interviews were conducted between March 2021 and March 2022.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

All participants were cisgender women who had undergone oocyte or embryo cryopreservation for medical indications at an academic fertility center. Participants were invited to interview by email if they were younger than 40 years old when their oocytes or embryos were cryopreserved. Interviews were conducted over the internet and transcribed verbatim. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis with the constant comparison method.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

Saturation was reached at 42 interviews. The median age of participants was 35 years old (range 28-43) at interview and 31 years old (range 25-39) at cryopreservation. Of the 42 women, 30 had a cancer diagnosis, while 7 had non-cancer chronic medical conditions, and 5 had hereditary cancer susceptibility syndromes. There were 12 women who banked embryos and 30 who banked oocytes. The majority of women indicated a desire to use their cryopreserved materials, but many were unsure about how or when. Four had already used their frozen oocytes or embryos, while another four had conceived without assisted reproduction. The cryopreservation experience was described by the majority as highly emotionally challenging because they felt out of place among couples receiving infertility treatment and, for cancer patients, overwhelmed by the complex decisions to be made in a short time period. Common reported barriers to using frozen materials included ongoing medical issues preventing pregnancy, the need for a gestational carrier, the lack of a partner, and the desire for unassisted conception. Some were glad to have frozen oocytes or embryos to allow more time to meet a partner or if they were considering becoming single parents.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

The majority of participants had their oocytes or embryos frozen at a single, urban, academic fertility center, which may limit generalizability. We also could not calculate a response rate because the snowball technique was used to identify additional participants, so did not know the total number of people invited to participate. Like other interview studies, our study may be subject to response bias because those who agreed to participate may have particularly positive or negative views about their experiences. Furthermore, the mean follow-up time since freezing was relatively short (3.3 years, median 2.7 years), which may not have been enough time for some patients to use their frozen materials.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

Learning about the experiences of patients undergoing medically indicated oocyte and embryo cryopreservation can help clinicians better counsel these patients regarding decisions and hurdles they may encounter. We found that most patients had not returned to use their frozen materials because of ongoing medical issues, the need for a gestational carrier, lack of a partner, or the desire to attempt unassisted reproduction.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

This study did not receive any funding. The authors of this study have no conflicts of interest to declare.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

N/A.

Public Awareness and Acceptability of PGT-M in Cancer Predisposition Syndromes

Cancer Predisposition Syndromes (CPSs), also known as Hereditary Cancer Syndromes (HCSs), represent a group of genetic disorders associated with an increased lifetime risk of developing cancer. In this article, we provide an overview of the reproductive options for patients diagnosed with CPS, focusing on the emerging role of Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Monogenic disorders (PGT-M). Specifically, we conducted a literature review about the awareness and acceptability of its application to CPSs. Based on the available data, the awareness of the applicability of PGT-M for CPSs appears to be limited among both patients and physicians, and a heterogeneous set of factors seems to influence the acceptability of the procedure. Our findings highlight the need for increasing education about the use of PGT-M for CPSs. In this context, guidelines developed by professional or institutional bodies would represent a useful reference tool to assist healthcare professionals in providing proper preconception counseling.

PGT-M, a Useful Tool to Manage the Lynch Syndrome Transmission

Lynch syndrome is one of the most common hereditary cancer sensitivity syndromes and is caused by autosomal-dominant germline mutations in DNA mismatch repair genes. In patients affected by this syndrome, pre-implantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders (PGT-M) could be the elective technique used to prevent the transmission of this hereditary syndrome to offspring. Notably, despite the severity of the condition, some authors have observed a markedly lower demand for PGT-M in these patients compared to those with other hereditary conditions. A 34-year-old woman with a medical history of Lynch syndrome associated with endometrial cancer came to the Villa Mafalda fertility center in Rome in order to conceive a healthy baby. In a pre-implantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) + PGT-M cycle, eight blastocysts were formed. Six out of eight blastocysts were affected by the same mother syndrome. One of the other two was aneuploid and the other one was a mosaic embryo, which resulted in a healthy pregnancy. The aim of this report is to emphasize the importance of a multidisciplinary approach to managing patients with this condition. In vitro fertilization (IVF), specifically PGT-M, is a tool that allow patients to conceive biological children with lower risk of inheriting the disease.

The neglected role of preimplantation genetic testing for Lynch syndrome

Preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic/single-gene disorders (PGT-M) is a procedure employed in the field of assisted reproductive technology to avoid the transmission of genetic diseases to the offspring. Hereditary cancer syndromes represent a diffuse and accepted indication for PGT-M, but take-up differs among the different disorders. Its use is markedly lower for the genes causing Lynch syndrome compared with the breast cancer type 1 or 2 susceptibility genes (BRCA1/2), despite the similar prevalence and severity of the two conditions. Reasons to explain this difference have not been explored. First, Lynch syndrome may be more frequently undiagnosed compared with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome. In addition, the different take-up may be due to different patient perceptions of the conditions and of the management options. Finally, this distinct attitude may depend on the awareness and sensibility of the professionals caring for affected patients. The authors' considerations are, however, speculative, and specific studies aimed at disentangling the causes of the different receptions of PGT-M are warranted to understand how to tackle this gap. In the meantime, we believe that empowerment regarding PGT-M of all individuals with hereditary cancer syndromes, including Lynch syndrome, is ethically due, and plead for a more active involvement of caregivers.

Underutilization of pretreatment fertility preservation counseling in reproductive-age women with gastrointestinal cancer

INTRODUCTION

Young patients with cancer face unique challenges, including disruption of family planning and fertility. Young adults represent an increasing proportion of gastrointestinal cancer patients, and the prevalence of pretreatment fertility preservation counseling in this population is unknown.

METHODS

Women 18-40 years who underwent surgery for gastric, colorectal, hepatobiliary, or pancreatic cancer from 2004 to 2019 were identified through the Mayo Clinic Cancer Registry. Natural language processing was used to search electronic medical records and identify documentation of pretreatment fertility counseling.

RESULTS

In total, 216 reproductive-age women who underwent resection of gastrointestinal cancers were identified. Pretreatment fertility preservation counseling by any provider was documented in 29 (13%) of the entire cohort. This increased to 26 (23%) in women who also received systemic therapy. This rate did not change over time (p > 0.05). Women who had pretreatment fertility preservation counseling were younger, had higher stage disease, and were more likely to undergo chemotherapy (all p < 0.05). Of the 29 women who had a documented pretreatment discussion, 22 (76%) met with a fertility specialist and 14 (48%) eventually underwent a fertility preservation procedure.

CONCLUSION

A small subset of reproductive-age women who underwent surgery for gastrointestinal cancer had documented pretreatment fertility preservation counseling and only one in ten women met with a fertility specialist. The high rate of proceeding to fertility preservation treatment further supports the importance of this discussion in all patients and represents an opportunity for improvement.

Fertility after Cancer: Risks and Successes

The incidence of cancer in reproductive-aged women is 7%, but, despite the increased number of cancer cases, advances in early diagnosis and treatment have raised the survival rate. Furthermore, in the last four decades, there has been a rising trend of delaying childbearing. There has been an increasing number of couples referred to Reproductive Medicine Centers for infertility problems after one partner has been treated for cancer. In these cases, the main cause of reduced fertility derives from treatments. In this review, we describe the effects and the risks of chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery in women with cancer, and we will focus on available fertility preservation techniques and their efficacy in terms of success in pregnancy and live birth rates.