Physician perspectives on unresolved issues in the use of conventional therapy in Crohn's disease: results from an international survey and discussion programme

Intestinal complications in patients with Crohn’s disease in the Brazilian public healthcare system between 2011 and 2020

BACKGROUND

This is a secondary database study using the Brazilian public healthcare system database.

AIM

To describe intestinal complications (ICs) of patients in the Brazilian public healthcare system with Crohn’s disease (CD) who initiated and either only received conventional therapy (CVT) or also initiated anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapy between 2011 and 2020.

METHODS

This study included patients with CD [international classification of diseases – 10^th revision (ICD-10): K50.0, K50.1, or K50.8] (age: ≥ 18 years) with at least one claim of CVT (sulfasalazine, azathioprine, mesalazine, or methotrexate). IC was defined as a CD-related hospitalization, pre-defined procedure codes (from rectum or intestinal surgery groups), and/or associated disease (pre-defined ICD-10 codes), and overall (one or more type of ICs).

RESULTS

In the 16809 patients with CD that met the inclusion criteria, the mean follow-up duration was 4.44 (2.37) years. In total, 14697 claims of ICs were found from 4633 patients. Over the 1- and 5-year of follow-up, 8.3% and 8.2% of the patients with CD, respectively, presented at least one IC, of which fistula (31%) and fistulotomy (48%) were the most commonly reported. The overall incidence rate (95%CI) of ICs was 6.8 (6.5–7.04) per 100 patient years for patients using only-CVT, and 9.2 (8.8–9.6) for patients with evidence of anti-TNF therapy.

CONCLUSION

The outcomes highlighted an important and constant rate of ICs over time in all the CD populations assessed, especially in patients exposed to anti-TNF therapy. This outcome revealed insights into the real-world treatment and complications relevant to patients with CD and highlights that this disease remains a concern that may require additional treatment strategies in the Brazilian public healthcare system.

Expert opinion on COVID-19 vaccination and the use of cladribine tablets in clinical practice

BACKGROUND

Gaps in current evidence and guidance leave clinicians with unanswered questions on the use of cladribine tablets for the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) in the era of the COVID-19 pandemic, in particular relating to COVID-19 vaccination.

OBJECTIVE

We describe a consensus-based program led by international MS experts with the aim of supplementing current guidelines and treatment labels by providing timely recommendations relating to COVID-19 vaccination and the use of cladribine tablets in clinical practice.

METHODS

A steering committee (SC) of 10 international MS experts identified 7 clinical questions to answer concerning the use of cladribine tablets and COVID-19 vaccination, which addressed issues relating to patient selection, timing and efficacy, and safety. Clinical recommendations to address each question were drafted using available evidence combined with expert opinion from the SC. An extended faculty of 28 MS experts, representing 19 countries, in addition to the 10 SC members, voted on the recommendations. Consensus on recommendations was achieved when ⩾75% of respondents expressed an agreement score of 7-9, on a 9-point scale.

RESULTS

Consensus was achieved on all 13 recommendations. Clinical recommendations are provided on whether all patients with MS receiving cladribine tablets should be vaccinated against COVID-19, and whether they should be prioritized; the timing of vaccination around dosing of cladribine tablets (i.e. before and after a treatment course); and the safety of COVID-19 vaccination for these patients.

CONCLUSION

These expert recommendations provide timely guidance on COVID-19 vaccination in patients receiving cladribine tablets, which is relevant to everyday clinical practice.

Treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases: focusing on 5-aminosalicylates and immunomodulators

Background: Recently, the incidence and prevalence rates of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have increased worldwide, including in Korea. Although there has been considerable progress in the management of IBD following the discovery of biologic agents, 5-aminosalicylate (5-ASA) and immunomodulators are still considered cornerstones in the management of mild to moderate IBD.Current Concepts: 5-ASA plays a key role in inducing remission in patients with mild to moderate ulcerative colitis. High doses of 5-ASA are more effective in inducing remission in patients with moderate ulcerative colitis, and combination therapy of oral 5-ASA and topical 5-ASA agents is recommended. Although the effect of 5-ASA in patients with Crohn disease is limited, high doses of 5-ASA can be effective for patients with mild disease, inflammatory behavior, and colonic involvement. Maintaining remission is essential for patients with IBD. Good doctor-patient relationships and encouraging drug adherence are recommended. Regarding drug adherence, a once-daily regimen is preferred for patients’ satisfaction. Thiopurines, the most important immunomodulators, show therapeutic benefits, such as steroid-sparing effects and remission maintenance in ulcerative colitis and Crohn disease after induction therapy. However, several side effects, including severe leukopenia, can induce the discontinuation of thiopurines. Close monitoring and management decisions should be individualized according to the risk of relapse and adverse events.Discussion and Conclusion: In conclusion, 5-ASA and immunomodulators are cornerstones in the management of IBD. As such, clinicians should have knowledge of these drugs and patients’ characteristics for proper prescription.

Expert opinion on the use of cladribine tablets in clinical practice

BACKGROUND

Gaps in current product labels and a lack of detailed clinical guidelines leaves clinicians' questions on the practical management of patients receiving cladribine tablets for the treatment of relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS) unanswered. We describe a consensus-based programme led by international MS experts with the aim of providing recommendations to support the use of cladribine tablets in clinical practice.

METHODS

A steering committee (SC) of nine international MS experts led the programme and developed 11 clinical questions concerning the practical use of cladribine tablets. Statements to address each question were drafted using available evidence, expert experiences and perspectives from the SC and an extended faculty of 33 MS experts, representing 19 countries. Consensus on recommendations was achieved when ⩾75% of respondents expressed an agreement score of 7-9, on a 9-point scale.

RESULTS

Consensus was achieved on 46 out of 47 recommendations. Expert-agreed practical recommendations are provided on topics including: the definition of highly active disease; patterns of treatment response and suboptimal response with cladribine tablets; management of pregnancy planning and malignancy risk, infection risk and immune function, and switching to and from cladribine tablets.

CONCLUSION

These expert recommendations provide up-to-date relevant guidance on the use of cladribine tablets in clinical practice.

Frequency and type of drug-related side effects necessitating treatment discontinuation in the Swiss Inflammatory Bowel Disease Cohort

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Systematic analyses of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) drug-related side effects necessitating treatment cessation in large cohorts of patients with IBD are scarce. We aimed to assess the frequency and type of drug-related side effects requiring drug cessation in patients included in the Swiss IBD Cohort.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of data from the Swiss IBD Cohort physician questionnaires documenting a treatment cessation for the following drug categories: aminosalicylates, topical and systemic steroids, thiopurines, methotrexate, tumor necrosis factor-antagonists, and calcineurin inhibitors (tacrolimus, cyclosporine).

RESULTS

A total of 3192 patients were analyzed, of whom 1792 (56.1%) had Crohn's disease, 1322 (41.4%) had ulcerative colitis, and 78 (2.5%) had IBD unclassified. Of 3138 patients treated with IBD drugs, 2129 (67.8%) presented with one or several drug-related side effects necessitating drug cessation. We found a significant positive correlation between the number of concomitantly administered IBD drugs and the occurrence of side effects requiring drug cessation (P<0.001). Logistic regression modeling identified Crohn's disease diagnosis [odds ratio (OR)=1.361, P=0.017], presence of extraintestinal manifestations (OR=2.262, P<0.001), IBD-related surgery (OR=1.419, P=0.006), and the increasing number of concomitantly used IBD drugs [OR=2.007 (P<0.001) for two concomitantly used IBD drugs; OR=3.225 (P<0.001) for at least three concomitantly used IBD drugs] to be associated significantly with the occurrence of IBD drug-related adverse events that necessitated treatment cessation.

CONCLUSION

Physicians should keep in mind that the number of concomitantly administered IBD drugs is the main risk factor for drug-related adverse events necessitating treatment cessation.

[How to Optimally Use Currently Available Drugs in a Therapeutic Algorithm?]

Recently, the incidence and prevalence of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have been increasing in worldwide, especially in Asian area. IBD is a chronic and progressive disease eventually causing bowel damage. The advance in the treatment of IBD over the past several decades has been achieved with the development of biologics. Furthermore, goals for management of IBD have been evolving from symptom-based management to mucosal healing, which can reduce the surgery rate and hospitalization. To treat the patients with IBD properly, identification of risk factors of patients should be preceded. In addition, the knowledge of several drugs, which are available in current situation is essential. In this review, optimal therapeutic approach with drugs including 5-aminosalicylate, steroid, immunomodulators and anti-TNF antagonists is discussed.

The use of oral corticosteroids in inflammatory bowel diseases in Italy: An IG-IBD survey

AIM

To evaluate how Italian gastroenterologists use corticosteroids in clinical practice for the treatment of Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

All members of the Italian Group for Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IG-IBD) were invited to fill in a web-based questionnaire.

RESULTS

131/448 (29.2%) members completed the survey. In mild-to-moderate UC and CD relapses, low-bioavailability steroids (LBS) are first-line therapy for 37% and 42% of clinicians, respectively. In case of failure, immediate step-up to biologics or immunosuppressants is considered by 23% and 29%. Regarding conventional corticosteroids (CCS), a fixed starting dose is prescribed by 50%, and a weight-based dose by 22%. Tapering is started after 7-10days by 41% and after 14days by 32%. The preferred tapering schedule is 5mg/week. In case of CCS failure, 47% switch to parenteral steroids before considering shifting to different drug classes. In case of symptoms recurrence during tapering, 14% re-increase the dose and try tapering again. Before prescribing steroids, 72% do not prescribe any specific evaluation whereas during treatment some evaluation is performed by 85%. Vitamin D and calcium supplements are routinely prescribed along with steroids by 38%.

CONCLUSIONS

Several discrepancies and some deviation from the available guidelines were recorded among Italian gastroenterologists regarding corticosteroids use in IBD patients.

Physician Perspectives on Unresolved Issues in the Management of Ulcerative Colitis: The UC Horizons Project

BACKGROUND

There is still uncertainty about what constitutes the best therapeutic practice in ulcerative colitis (UC).

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of the "UC Horizons Project" was to raise a series of questions regarding the management of UC to provide responses based on the best scientific evidence available.

METHODS

The 11 members of the scientific committee prepared draft answers to the 10 questions from available evidence after a literature search. A total of 48 Spanish gastroenterology specialists nationwide participated in the project. The national meeting discussed the 10 issues in working groups and reached consensus regarding the recommendations by anonymous, interactive vote following the Delphi methodology. Final answers were developed, based on evidence and clinical experience of the participants.

RESULTS

All the recommendations achieved a high level of agreement in the plenary vote, although the quality of the evidence was markedly heterogeneous. The lowest percentage of agreement corresponded to the questions with the weakest level of evidence, highlighting the necessity of conducting further studies in these areas. The recommendations focused on (1) aminosalicylates therapy (regarding dose and appropriateness of coadministration with thiopurines), (2) corticosteroid therapy (regarding dose and route of administration), (3) thiopurine treatment (regarding indications and possibility of withdrawal), (4) anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy (regarding appropriateness of combination with thiopurines, intensification, or discontinuation of treatment), and (5) colorectal cancer (regarding risk and time trends).

CONCLUSIONS

The UC Horizons Project raised a series of eminently practical questions about the management of UC and provided responses based on the best scientific evidence available.

Efficacy of Adalimumab in Korean Patients with Crohn's Disease

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Adalimumab is effective for both remission induction and the maintenance of Crohn's disease (CD) in Western countries. We evaluated the efficacy of adalimumab in the conventional step-up treatment approach for CD in Korea.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 62 patients with CD who were treated with adalimumab. Their Crohn's disease activity index (CDAI) was measured at weeks 4, 8, and 52. Clinical remission was defined as a CDAI score <150. Induction and maintenance outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

Forty-one patients (66.1%) achieved a reduction of 70 CDAI points at week 8. Among them, 28 (45.2%) achieved clinical remission at week 8, 20 (32.3%) maintained remission at week 52. The absence of prior anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy and Montreal classification L1 at baseline predicted clinical remission at week 8 in the multivariate logistic regression analysis. In the Cox proportional hazards model, the hazard ratio for the secondary loss of response during maintenance therapy after clinical remission induction was significantly higher in patients who showed initial mild CDAI severity or Montreal classification A3.

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, anti-TNF therapy-naive and Montreal classification L1 were associated with adalimumab efficacy as induction therapy in CD. Further studies are warranted to determine the prognostic factors for the long-term response after adalimumab therapy.

Monitoring disease activity and progression in Crohn's disease. A Swiss perspective on the IBD ahead 'optimised monitoring' recommendations

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The structured IBD Ahead 'Optimised Monitoring' programme was designed to obtain the opinion, insight and advice of gastroenterologists on optimising the monitoring of Crohn's disease activity in four settings: (1) assessment at diagnosis, (2) monitoring in symptomatic patients, (3) monitoring in asymptomatic patients, and (4) the postoperative follow-up. For each of these settings, four monitoring methods were discussed: (a) symptom assessment, (b) endoscopy, (c) laboratory markers, and (d) imaging. Based on literature search and expert opinion compiled during an international consensus meeting, recommendations were given to answer the question 'which diagnostic method, when, and how often'. The International IBD Ahead Expert Panel advised to tailor this guidance to the healthcare system and the special prerequisites of each country. The IBD Ahead Swiss National Steering Committee proposes best-practice recommendations adapted for Switzerland.

METHODS

The IBD Ahead Steering Committee identified key questions and provided the Swiss Expert Panel with a structured literature research. The expert panel agreed on a set of statements. During an international expert meeting the consolidated outcome of the national meetings was merged into final statements agreed by the participating International and National Steering Committee members - the IBD Ahead 'Optimized Monitoring' Consensus.

RESULTS

A systematic assessment of symptoms, endoscopy findings, and laboratory markers with special emphasis on faecal calprotectin is deemed necessary even in symptom-free patients. The choice of recommended imaging methods is adapted to the specific situation in Switzerland and highlights the importance of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging besides endoscopy.

CONCLUSION

The recommendations stress the importance of monitoring disease activity on a regular basis and by objective parameters, such as faecal calprotectin and endoscopy with detailed documentation of findings. Physicians should not rely on symptoms only and adapt the monitoring schedule and choice of options to individual situations.

How thiopurines are used for the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases: an Italian survey

BACKGROUND

The ideal manner of thiopurine use in inflammatory bowel disease has not been defined. We aimed at investigating the attitudes of Italian gastroenterologists on thiopurine use.

METHODS

A web-based survey was performed among 295 gastroenterologists.

RESULTS

Overall, 70 surveys were completed. At baseline, thiopurine methyltransferase genotype and phenotype were not assessed by 87.1% and 97.1% of respondents, respectively. At treatment onset, 17.1% adopted full weight-calculated dose while 80.0% preferred escalating the dose. During treatment, 87.1% and 64.3% reduced the dose for myelo- and liver toxicity, respectively; 48.6% for increased pancreatic enzymes, 17.1% for fever, and 5.7% for arthralgia. A systematic shift from one thiopurine to the other was reported by 4.3% of respondents in case of failure, and by 5.7% for adverse effects. Forty-four gastroenterologists (62.9%) stopped thiopurine treatment after 5-7 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Several discrepancies regarding the use of thiopurines in clinical practice were found, deviating from available guidelines. A more standardised attitude is needed in clinical practice.

Chromogranin A as a biomarker of disease activity and biologic therapy in inflammatory bowel disease: a prospective observational study

OBJECTIVE

To access the correlation of Chromogranin A (CgA) with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) activity and responsiveness to medical therapy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A prospective observational study was conducted in 56 patients with moderate ulcerative colitis (UC) or Crohn's disease (CD) (UC, n = 29, CD, n = 27), 17 patients with irritable bowel syndrome and predominant diarrhea (IBS-D) and 40 healthy volunteers. IBD patients were treated by biologics (infliximab or adalimumab) or conventional agents (aminosalicylates, thiopurines or methotrexate and steroids) and were classified according to their treatment in two groups. Serum CgA was measured at baseline and 4-week posttreatment period.

RESULTS

Serum CgA was significantly higher in IBD patients than in those with IBS-D or healthy volunteers (p < 0.01). Furthermore, serum CgA was markedly increased in CD patients than in UC patients (p < 0.01). CgA value was significantly reduced in 'biologic' group (24 IBD patients, UC, n = 15, CD, n = 9) at 4-week posttreatment period (p < 0.01), while 18/24 (72%) patients were already in remission during that time. In contrast, CgA value was significantly increased in the 'conventional' treatment group (32 IBD patients, UC, n = 14, CD, n = 18) between the two visits (p < 0.01), although 22/32 (69%) patients were in remission during the 4-week posttreatment period.

CONCLUSION

CgA appears to be a reliable marker of disease activity in IBD patients and especially in those who received biologic therapy. IBS-D patients presented normal CgA values.

What do changes in inflammatory bowel disease management mean for our patients?

Treatment goals in Crohn's disease are evolving beyond the control of symptoms. A treat-to-target approach to management that features earlier initiation of TNF antagonist therapy will enable resolution of objective parameters of inflammation. The decision to initiate anti-TNF therapy should be based on a patient-specific assessment of risks and benefits. This paradigm necessitates a complex process, influenced by multiple factors that include the quality of data available, physicians' and patients' knowledge of the data, and the preferences and values of patients, physicians and society. The potential 'opportunity cost' resulting from a delay in initiation of effective therapy, a consideration that has been neglected in the past, must also enter into the equation. Our evolving approach to the management of Crohn's disease challenges patients to participate in the decision-making process and to become an active partner in their care. Ideally, this evolution should occur within the context of an enduring physician/patient relationship that is based on mutual trust. Motivational communication provides a useful technique to improve dialogue and collaboration between healthcare professionals and patients, and may help to engage and motivate patients to commit to managing their disease.

Implementing changes in clinical practice to improve the management of Crohn's disease

The introduction of anti-tumour necrosis factor therapies has provided highly effective treatments for Crohn's disease, making it possible to significantly improve the prognosis of patients. However, neither conventional non-biological therapies nor anti-tumour necrosis factor therapies are routinely used to optimum effect. There are several reasons for this, including a lack of specific evidence to guide common clinical questions and a lack of clearly defined treatment targets. This paper suggests some simple changes to the management of Crohn's disease that have the potential to significantly improve patient outcomes. A new treatment target, 'deep remission', which includes mucosal healing as well as clinical remission, may be the first step in defining the successful treatment of Crohn's disease; early clinical studies have demonstrated that this is a readily achievable target. Initiating appropriate treatment early can increase clinical remission rates, improve steroid sparing, induce mucosal healing and prevent structural bowel damage, whereby reducing the need for hospitalization and surgery. There are also clear indications that modifying treatment based on regular objective assessments of disease activity to provide tight disease control can improve patient outcomes in a similar way to that observed in rheumatoid arthritis. These simple changes to management strategy appear to allow the full potential of available treatments to be realized. Clinical studies to further define optimized treatment strategies for Crohn's disease are underway and will provide future direction.