Random biopsies during surveillance colonoscopy increase dysplasia detection in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis and ulcerative colitis

Increased Active Inflammation in the Colon is Not a Reliable Predictor of an Elevated Risk of Dysplasia in Patients With Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis and Ulcerative Colitis

Although the increased risk of colorectal neoplasia in patients with both primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) and ulcerative colitis (UC; termed PSC-UC) is well documented, the mechanism through which concomitant PSC increases the risk of colorectal neoplasia remains unclear. Given that the risk of colorectal neoplasia in UC is positively correlated with increased histologic inflammation, this study sought to investigate whether increased histologic inflammation could be used to stratify the risk of dysplasia development in patients with PSC-UC. Twenty patients with PSC-UC and dysplasia were compared with 30 control patients with PSC-UC who had no history of neoplasia. For each patient, all surveillance biopsies were scored using a 4-point scoring system: (1) no epithelial neutrophils = 0, (2) cryptitis only = 1, (3) cryptitis plus crypt abscess in <50% of crypts = 2, and (4) crypt abscess in ≥50% of crypts, erosion, neutrophilic exudate, and/or ulceration = 3. A score was designated for each biopsy, and both mean and maximum inflammation scores were calculated from all biopsies taken during each colonoscopy. The inflammation burden score was calculated for each surveillance interval by multiplying the average maximum score between each pair of surveillance episodes by the length of the surveillance interval in years. The average scores derived from all colonoscopies for each patient were used to determine the patient's overall mean, maximum, and inflammation burden scores. In both the dysplasia and control groups, the 3 summative inflammation scores were calculated independently for the entire colon, right colon, and left colon. The dysplasia group consisted of 14 (70%) men and 6 (30%) women, with a mean age of 27 years at UC diagnosis and a long history of pancolitis (mean duration: 17 y). A total of 49 dysplastic lesions were detected in the dysplasia group, and 8 (40%) of the 20 patients had multifocal dysplasia. The majority of dysplastic lesions belonged to nonconventional subtypes (n = 28; 57%) and were located in the right colon (n = 37; 76%). Irrespective of the colon segment, there was no significant difference in the 3 summative inflammation scores between the dysplasia and control groups (P > 0.05). However, in each group, the 3 summative inflammation scores were significantly higher in the right colon than in the left colon (P< 0.05). In conclusion, patients with PSC-UC exhibit increased histologic inflammation in the right colon compared with the left colon, regardless of the presence of dysplasia. Although this may provide an explanation for the predominance of right-sided colorectal neoplasia in patients with PSC-UC, increased histologic inflammation does not reliably predict an elevated risk of dysplasia in patients with PSC-UC. These findings reinforce the current recommendation for annual endoscopic surveillance for all patients with PSC-UC, irrespective of the extent and severity of inflammation.

New Technologies in Digestive Endoscopy for Ulcerative Colitis Patients

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease primarily affecting the colon and rectum. Endoscopy plays a crucial role in the diagnosis and management of UC. Recent advancements in endoscopic technology, including chromoendoscopy, confocal laser endomicroscopy, endocytoscopy and the use of artificial intelligence, have revolutionized the assessment and treatment of UC patients. These innovative techniques enable early detection of dysplasia and cancer, more precise characterization of disease extent and severity and more targeted biopsies, leading to improved diagnosis and disease monitoring. Furthermore, these advancements have significant implications for therapeutic decision making, empowering clinicians to carefully consider a range of treatment options, including pharmacological therapies, endoscopic interventions and surgical approaches. In this review, we provide an overview of the latest endoscopic technologies and their applications for diagnosing and monitoring UC. We also discuss their impact on treatment decision making, highlighting the potential benefits and limitations of each technique.

Colorectal cancer risk of flat low-grade dysplasia in inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review and proportion meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

To date, the optimal management of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and flat low-grade dysplasia (fLGD) of the colon or rectum remains controversial.

METHODS

A systematic review was reported in accordance with PRISMA 2020 (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses). Patients diagnosed with fLGD on surveillance endoscopy were pooled from studies published between 2000 and 2020. Advanced neoplasia was defined by the presence of HGD, CRC or small bowel adenocarcinoma detected on subsequent surveillance endoscopy or from examination of resection specimens. We estimated the pooled annual incidence rate of colorectal cancer (CRC) and advanced neoplasia, and the risk factors associated with neoplastic progression.

RESULTS

We identified 24 articles and 738 IBD patients were diagnosed with fLGD on endoscopy. Two hundred thirty-six patients (32%) underwent immediate surgery with surgical specimens demonstrating CRC in 8 patients (pooled prevalence, 8.66%; 95% CI 3.58-19.46) and HGD (high grade dysplasia) in 11 patients (pooled prevalence, 13.97%; 95% CI 5.65-30.65). Five hundred-two patients (68%) underwent endoscopic surveillance with 63 patients with fLGD progressing to advanced neoplasia during endoscopic surveillance (38 HGD, 24 CRC and one patient developing small bowel adenocarcinoma). The mean duration of follow-up after fLGD diagnosis was 71 months (10.9-212). The pooled incidence of CRC and advanced neoplasia was 0.5 (95% CI 0.23-0.77) and 1.71 per 100 patient-year (95% CI 0.88-2.54) respectively. The use of corticosteroids and location of fLGD in the distal colon were significantly associated with neoplastic progression.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides a summary incidence rate of CRC and advanced neoplasia in patients with IBD and fLGD to inform surgeons' and endoscopists' decision-making thus reducing potential ineffective treatments.

Increased Risk of Non-conventional and Invisible Dysplasias in Patients with Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis and Inflammatory Bowel Disease

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis and inflammatory bowel disease [termed PSC-IBD] have a higher risk of developing colorectal neoplasia than those with IBD alone. The mechanism by which concomitant PSC increases the risk of colorectal neoplasia remains unknown. Seven distinct non-conventional dysplastic subtypes have been recently described in IBD, including crypt cell dysplasia, hypermucinous dysplasia, goblet cell-deficient dysplasia, dysplasia with increased Paneth cell differentiation [DPD], sessile serrated lesion [SSL]-like dysplasia, traditional serrated adenoma [TSA]-like dysplasia, and serrated dysplasia, not otherwise specified [NOS]. Despite the lack of high-grade morphological features, crypt cell, hypermucinous, and goblet cell-deficient dysplasias often show molecular features characteristic of advanced neoplasia [i.e. aneuploidy and KRAS mutations] and are more frequently associated with advanced neoplasia than conventional dysplasia on follow-up. We aimed to characterise clinicopathological features of dysplasia found in PSC-IBD patients.

METHODS

A cohort of 173 PSC-IBD patients were analysed. All dysplastic lesions were subtyped as either conventional or non-conventional dysplasia. The clinicopathological features of PSC-IBD patients with neoplasia were also compared with those of non-PSC IBD patients with neoplasia.

RESULTS

There were 109 [63%] men and 64 [37%] women, with a mean age of 26 years at IBD diagnosis and a long history of IBD [mean duration: 14 years]. Ulcerative colitis was the most common IBD subtype [80%], and the majority of patients [92%] had a history of pancolitis. A total of 153 dysplastic lesions were detected in 54 [31%] patients, 35 [65%] of whom had multifocal dysplasia. One additional patient presented with colorectal cancer [CRC] without a history of dysplasia. Dysplasia was often non-conventional [n = 93; 61%], endoscopically/grossly invisible [n = 101; 66%], and right/proximal-sided [n = 90; 59%]. All seven non-conventional subtypes were identified, including 46 [30%] crypt cell dysplasia, 23 [15%] hypermucinous dysplasia, 12 [8%] goblet cell-deficient dysplasia, seven [5%] DPD, three [2%] TSA-like dysplasia, one [1%] SSL-like dysplasia, and one [1%] serrated dysplasia NOS. Follow-up information was available for 86 lesions, of which 32 [37%] were associated with subsequent detection of advanced neoplasia [high-grade dysplasia or CRC] within a mean follow-up time of 55 months. PSC-IBD patients with neoplasia were more likely to have pancolitis [98%, p = 0.039] and a longer IBD duration [mean: 17 years, p = 0.021] than those without neoplasia [89% and 12 years, respectively]. When compared with a cohort of non-PSC IBD patients with neoplasia, the PSC-IBD group with neoplasia was more often associated with non-conventional [61%, p <0.001], invisible [66%, p <0.001], and right/proximal-sided [59%, p = 0.045] dysplasias [vs 25%, 21%, and 47%, respectively, for the non-PSC IBD group]. The rate of advanced neoplasia was nearly 2-fold higher in the PSC-IBD group [37%] compared with the non-PSC IBD group [22%] [p = 0.035].

CONCLUSIONS

Nearly a third of PSC-IBD patients developed dysplasia, which is often associated with non-conventional dysplastic features, invisible endoscopic/gross appearance, right/proximal-sided colon, multifocality, and advanced neoplasia on follow-up. These findings underscore the importance of recognising these non-conventional subtypes by practising pathologists and the need for careful and frequent endoscopic surveillance, with random biopsies, in PSC-IBD patients.

Colorectal Cancer in Ulcerative Colitis: Mechanisms, Surveillance and Chemoprevention

Patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) are at a two- to three-fold increased risk of developing colorectal cancer (CRC) than the general population based on population-based data. UC-CRC has generated a series of clinical problems, which are reflected in its worse prognosis and higher mortality than sporadic CRC. Chronic inflammation is a significant contributor to the development of UC-CRC, so comprehending the relationship between the proinflammatory factors and epithelial cells together with downstream signaling pathways is the core to elucidate the mechanisms involved in developing of CRC. Clinical studies have shown the importance of early prevention, detection and management of CRC in patients with UC, and colonoscopic surveillance at regular intervals with multiple biopsies is considered the most effective way. The use of endoscopy with targeted biopsies of visible lesions has been supported in most populations. In contrast, random biopsies in patients with high-risk characteristics have been suggested during surveillance. Some of the agents used to treat UC are chemopreventive, the effects of which will be examined in cancers in UC in a population-based setting. In this review, we outline the current state of potential risk factors and chemopreventive recommendations in UC-CRC, with a specific focus on the proinflammatory mechanisms in promoting CRC and evidence for personalized surveillance.

Clinicopathologic Features of Undetected Dysplasia Found in Total Colectomy or Proctocolectomy Specimens of Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease

AIMS

It remains controversial as to whether targeted biopsies should completely replace random biopsies for dysplasia surveillance in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Several histologic patterns of non-conventional dysplasia have been described in IBD. This study aimed to investigate the rate and clinicopathologic features of dysplastic lesions found in total colectomy or proctocolectomy specimens that were undetected on prior colonoscopy.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The study analyzed 207 consecutive IBD patients who underwent a total colectomy or proctocolectomy and had at least one high definition colonoscopy prior to colectomy. Dysplasia found in the colectomy specimens was classified as undetected, only when there was no corresponding site of dysplasia detected on previous colonoscopic biopsies. Twenty-seven (13%) patients had 49 undetected dysplastic lesions found only at colectomy, while 22 (11%) had 31 previously detected dysplastic lesions only. The remaining 158 (76%) patients had no dysplasia. A greater proportion of the undetected (19%) or previously detected (23%) dysplasia group had concurrent primary sclerosing cholangitis compared with only 3% in the group without dysplasia (p < 0.001). The undetected dysplastic lesions were more likely to have non-conventional dysplastic features (76%), low-grade dysplasia (94%), and a flat/invisible gross appearance (73%) compared with the previously detected dysplastic lesions (13%, 68%, and 48%, respectively) (p < 0.05). Almost all patients with undetected dysplasia (93%) had a colonoscopy within 1 year of colectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

The rate of undetected dysplasia is not insignificant (13%), suggesting that increased random biopsies may improve the rate of dysplasia detection, including non-conventional dysplasia.

Danish Society for Gastroenterology and Hepatology's clinical recommendations for colonoscopic surveillance for colorectal dysplasia and cancer in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to produce clinical recommendations for colonoscopic surveillance for dysplasia and colorectal cancer in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The Danish Society for Gastroenterology and Hepatology convened a committee to assess the literature on colorectal cancer in inflammatory bowel diseases and the effectiveness of colonoscopy surveillance, according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence Based Medicine levels of evidence.

RESULTS

Clinical recommendations for the colonoscopic surveillance for dysplasia and colorectal cancer in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases were produced. These guidelines cover the risk stratification, entry, and follow-up of patients in the colonoscopy programme, the choice of image-enhanced colonoscopy modality, the investigation and treatment of lesions, and the management of special patient populations in the colonoscopy programme.

CONCLUSIONS

Colonoscopic surveillance of inflammatory bowel disease is thought to be associated with a decreased risk of colorectal cancer and colorectal cancer-related mortality. Further evidence regarding the effectiveness of colonoscopic surveillance will contribute to understanding its role in the management of inflammatory bowel diseases. The Danish Society for Gastroenterology and Hepatology clinical guideline will aid gastroenterologists in the risk stratification of patients with inflammatory bowel disease, and the management of colorectal lesions. Gastroenterologists must inform and support patients with inflammatory bowel disease to decide whether to participate in the colonoscopic surveillance programme.

Surveillance and management of colorectal dysplasia and cancer in inflammatory bowel disease: Current practice and future perspectives

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at increased risk of developing colorectal cancer (CRC). Current guidelines recommend frequent surveillance colonoscopies for patients with at least left-sided ulcerative colitis, or Crohn's disease involving more than 30% of the colon. Surveillance allows for early detection and treatment of colorectal dysplasia and cancer. The first colonoscopy should be performed 8 to 10 years after onset of disease symptoms. European and British guidelines employ a risk-stratification algorithm that assigns patients to surveillance intervals of one, three or five years, whereas American guidelines recommend to perform surveillance every 1 to 3 years based on the (combined) presence of risk factors. Patients with concomitant primary sclerosing cholangitis are at an additionally increased risk, and should undergo annual surveillance starting immediately after the diagnosis. The current practice of surveillance is based on limited evidence, is resource intensive and cannot preclude the occurrence of interval carcinomas. Fortunately, advances in endoscopic techniques for mucosal visualisation, along with better control of inflammation, have resulted in a declining incidence of CRC in patients with IBD. Furthermore, advanced endoscopic resection techniques can be expected to result in a shift from surgical to endoscopic management of dysplastic lesions. In this review, we provide an up-to-date overview of colitis-associated CRC pathophysiology, epidemiology, surveillance practices, and management of dysplasia.

Dysplasia Surveillance in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Cohort Study

Introduction

Patients with colonic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at an increased risk for colorectal cancer (CRC), whereby surveillance colonoscopy is recommended.

Aim

To study the clinical and endoscopic variables associated with dysplasia in IBD patients.

Methods

A cohort study was conducted on IBD patients who were part of a colonoscopy surveillance program between 2011 and 2016.

Results

A total of 342 colonoscopies were performed on 162 patients (105 with ulcerative colitis [UC] and 57 with Crohn's disease). Random biopsies were performed at least once on 81.5% of patients; 33.3% of the patients underwent chromoendoscopy (CE) at least once. Endoscopically resectable lesions were detected in 55 patients (34%), and visible lesions deemed unfit for endoscopic resection were found in 5 patients (3.1%). Overall, 62 dysplastic visible lesions (58 with low-grade dysplasia and 3 with high-grade dysplasia) and 1 adenocarcinoma were found in 34 patients. Dysplasia in random biopsies was present in 3 patients, the yield of random biopsies for dysplasia being 1.85%/patient (3/162), 1.75%/colonoscopy (6/342), and 0.25%/biopsy (9/3,637). Dysplasia detected in random biopsies was significantly associated with a personal history of visible dysplasia (p = 0.006). Upon univariate analysis, dysplasia was significantly associated with the type of IBD, the performance of random biopsies, and CE (p = 0.016/0.009/0.05, respectively). On multivariate analysis, dysplasia was associated with duration of disease.

Conclusion

Our data confirm that patients with long-standing IBD, in particular UC, should be enrolled in dysplasia surveillance programs, and that performing CE and random biopsies seems to help in the detection of colonic neoplastic lesions.

Yield of Random Biopsies During Colonoscopies in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients Undergoing Dysplasia Surveillance

BACKGROUND

The development of chromoendoscopy (CE) and high definition endoscopy (HDE) has improved detection of subtle colonic dysplasia in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs). The role of random biopsies for dysplasia surveillance is unclear.

METHODS

We reviewed patients with IBD who underwent a CE or HDE colonoscopy and had colonic dysplasia detected. Detection of dysplasia was classified as either visible or random and graded as low grade dysplasia (LGD), high grade dysplasia (HGD), or indefinite for dysplasia. Multivariable regression adjusted for relevant confounders examined the predictors of dysplasia detectable on random biopsies alone.

RESULTS

The study included 300 patients (203 ulcerative colitis, 97 Crohn's disease with colonic involvement) contributing 442 colonoscopies; the mean disease duration was 24.5 years; 7.2% had primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). Three hundred sixty-two colonoscopies (82%) had only visible dysplasia, 52 (12%) had only random dysplasia, and 28 (6%) had both visible and random dysplasia. Longer disease duration (odds ratio, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.01-1.07), active inflammation (odds ratio, 2.89; 95% CI, 1.26-6.67), and concomitant PSC (odds ratio, 3.66; 95% CI, 1.21-11.08) were associated with detecting dysplasia on random biopsies compared with visible lesions. Patients with random dysplasia (21%) or both random and visible dysplasia (21%) were more likely to undergo surgical resection compared with those with only visible dysplasia (5%; P < 0.001) and have subsequent development of colorectal cancer (15%, 7%, 1%, respectively; P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Nearly one fifth of dysplasia detected in patients with IBD was found on random biopsies. Patients with high risk characteristics may benefit from continuing the practice of random biopsies during surveillance examinations.

Improving the quality of surveillance colonoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease

Several recommendations have addressed the topic of improving the quality of surveillance colonoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease. However, there is variation between these recommendations, in part due to the absence of well-defined quality indicators, suggesting that these quality indicators should be studied and developed. We did a systematic review of evidence related to surveillance colonoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease to look at the different variables in this practice and offer a critique of the quality control measures before, during, and after the procedure. We identified several key quality measures that could be adopted in clinical practice, including control of inflammation, optimal bowel preparation, ideal time allocation, training, sedation, detection and characterisation of lesions, therapeutic management of the lesions, and colonoscopic reports. However, further primary research and consensus reports are needed to continue developing roadmaps at a global level.

Cancer risk in primary sclerosing cholangitis: Epidemiology, prevention, and surveillance strategies

Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a rare cholestatic liver disease characterized by progressive fibroinflammatory destruction of the intra- and/or extrahepatic biliary ducts. While its features and disease course can be variable, most patients with PSC have concurrent inflammatory bowel disease and will eventually develop liver cirrhosis and end-stage liver disease, with liver transplantation representing the only potentially curative option. Importantly, PSC is associated with a significantly increased risk of malignancy compared to the general population, mainly cholangiocarcinoma, gallbladder carcinoma, hepatocellular carcinoma, and colorectal cancer, with nearly 50% of deaths in patients with PSC being due to cancer. Therefore, robust surveillance strategies are needed, though uncertainty remains regarding how to best do so. In this review, we discuss the epidemiology, prevention, and surveillance of cancers in patients with PSC. Where evidence is limited, we present pragmatic approaches based on currently available data and expert opinion.

Screening and surveillance methods for dysplasia in inflammatory bowel disease patients: Where do we stand?

Patients with long-standing ulcerative colitis (UC) and extensive Crohn’s colitis (CC) are at increased risk for dysplasia and colorectal cancer (CRC). Several studies have shown that UC extending proximal to the rectum, CC involving at least 1/3 of the colon, co-existence of primary sclerosing cholangitis, undetermined or unclassified colitis, family history of CRC and young age at diagnosis appear to be independent risk factors for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) - related CRC. Therefore, screening and surveillance for CRC in IBD patients is highly recommended by international and national guidelines, whilst colonoscopy remains the unequivocal tool in order to detect potentially resectable dysplastic lesions or CRC at an early stage. Although the importance of screening and surveillance is widely proven, there is a controversy regarding the time of the first colonoscopy and the criteria of who should undergo surveillance. In addition, there are different recommendations among scientific societies concerning which endoscopic method is more efficient to detect dysplasia early, as well as the terminology for reporting visible lesions and the management of those lesions. This article concisely presents the main endoscopic methods and techniques performed for detecting dysplasia and CRC surveillance in patients with IBD focusing on their evidence-based accuracy and efficiency, as well as their cost-effectiveness. Finally, newer methods are mentioned, highlighting their applicability in daily endoscopic practice.

High Risk of Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia in Patients With Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis Associated With Inflammatory Bowel Disease

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC, termed PSC-IBD) are at increased risk for colorectal cancer, but their risk following a diagnosis of low-grade dysplasia (LGD) is not well described. We aimed to determine the rate of advanced colorectal neoplasia (aCRN), defined as high-grade dysplasia and/or colorectal cancer, following a diagnosis of indefinite dysplasia or LGD in this population.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective, longitudinal study of 1911 patients with colonic IBD (293 with PSC and 1618 without PSC) who underwent more than 2 surveillance colonoscopies from 2000 through 2015 in The Netherlands or the United States (9265 patient-years of follow-up evaluation). We collected data on clinical and demographic features of patients, as well as data from each surveillance colonoscopy and histologic report. For each surveillance colonoscopy, the severity of active inflammation was documented. The primary outcome was a diagnosis of aCRN during follow-up evaluation. We also investigated factors associated with aCRN in patients with or without a prior diagnosis of indefinite dysplasia or LGD.

RESULTS

Patients with PSC-IBD had a 2-fold higher risk of developing aCRN than patients with non-PSC IBD. Mean inflammation scores did not differ significantly between patients with PSC-IBD (0.55) vs patients with non-PSC IBD (0.56) (P = .89), nor did proportions of patients with LGD (21% of patients with PSC-IBD vs 18% of patients with non-PSC IBD) differ significantly (P = .37). However, the rate of aCRN following a diagnosis of LGD was significantly higher in patients with PSC-IBD (8.4 per 100 patient-years) than patients with non-PSC IBD (3.0 per 100 patient-years; P = .01). PSC (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 2.01; 95% CI, 1.09-3.71), increasing age (aHR 1.03; 95% CI, 1.01-1.05), and active inflammation (aHR, 2.39; 95% CI, 1.63-3.49) were independent risk factors for aCRN. Dysplasia was more often endoscopically invisible in patients with PSC-IBD than in patients with non-PSC IBD.

CONCLUSIONS

In a longitudinal study of almost 2000 patients with colonic IBD, PSC remained a strong independent risk factor for aCRN. Once LGD is detected, aCRN develops at a higher rate in patients with PSC and is more often endoscopically invisible than in patients with only IBD. Our findings support recommendations for careful annual colonoscopic surveillance for patients with IBD and PSC, and consideration of colectomy once LGD is detected.

Early detection of ulcerative colitis-associated colorectal cancer

Colitis-associated colorectal cancer (CACC) is one of the most serious complications of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), particularly in ulcerative colitis (UC); it accounts for approximately 15% of all-causes mortality among IBD patients. Because CACC shows a worse prognosis and higher mortality than sporadic colorectal cancer, early detection is critical. Colonoscopy is primarily recommended for surveillance and several advanced endoscopic imaging techniques are emerging. In addition, recent studies have reported on attempts to develop clinically relevant biomarkers for surveillance using various biosamples, which may become high-performance screening tools in the future, so the best approach and technique for cancer surveillance in long-standing UC patients remain under debate. This review gives a comprehensive description and summary about what progress has been made in terms of early CACC detection.

Are random biopsies still useful for the detection of neoplasia in patients with IBD undergoing surveillance colonoscopy with chromoendoscopy?

BACKGROUND

Colonoscopy with pan-chromoendoscopy (CE) is superior to standard colonoscopy in detecting neoplasia in patients with IBD. Performing random biopsies in unsuspicious mucosa after CE remains controversial.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with IBD who underwent surveillance colonoscopy using CE were prospectively included. The standardised procedure used CE, performed targeted biopsies or endoscopic resection on suspicious lesions and then quadrant random biopsies every 10 cm. A panel of five expert pathologists reviewed histological slides with dysplasia. Logistic regression model was used to evidence the factors associated with neoplasia in any or in random biopsies.

RESULTS

1000 colonoscopes were performed in 1000 patients (495 UC, 505 Crohn's colitis). In 82 patients, neoplasia was detected from targeted biopsies or removed lesions, and among them dysplasia was detected also by random biopsies in 7 patients. Importantly, in 12 additional patients dysplasia was only detected by random biopsies. Overall, 140 neoplastic sites were found in 94 patients, 112 (80%) from targeted biopsies or removed lesions and 28 (20%) by random biopsies. The yield of neoplasia by random biopsies only was 0.2% per-biopsy (68/31 865), 1.2% per-colonoscopy (12/1000) but 12.8% per-patient with neoplasia (12/94). Dysplasia detected by random biopsies was associated with a personal history of neoplasia, a tubular appearing colon and the presence of primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite their low yield, random biopsies should be performed in association with CE in patients with IBD with a personal history of neoplasia, concomitant PSC or a tubular colon during colonoscopy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

IRB 001508, Paris 7 University.

Hepatobiliary manifestations of ulcerative colitis: an example of gut-liver crosstalk

The interaction between inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and hepatobiliary manifestations represents a classic example of liver-gut crosstalk. The importance of liver-gut crosstalk in IBD is demonstrated in the pathogenesis and outcome of primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) in IBD patients. Immunoglobulin G4-associated cholangitis (IAC), which has recently been described in UC patients, may also illustrate the significance of gut-liver interaction in these patients. Presence of these hepatobiliary manifestations influences the outcome of associated IBD, in particular ulcerative colitis (UC), and vice versa. The pathogenesis of PSC is postulated to be related to gut inflammation in IBD that results in inflammation in the portal tracts (the 'leaky gut'). Enterohepatic circulation of lymphocytes from the gut to the liver is also of potential relevance to PSC pathogenesis and outcomes. The presence of PSC and gut inflammation in IBD influences the course and outcomes of both diseases. Further research is required, to understand the mutual effect of liver-gut crosstalk in the outcomes of UC patients, and highlights the importance of an interdisciplinary approach-involving gastroenterologists, hepatologists, advanced endoscopists and liver transplant surgeons-in the management of these patients.