Survival predictors and outcomes of patients with recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck cancer treated with chemotherapy plus cetuximab as first-line therapy: A real-world retrospective study

Pembrolizumab with Carboplatin and Paclitaxel Versus Alternative Systemic Treatments Recommended for the First-Line Treatment of Recurrent/Metastatic Head and Neck Cancer: An Indirect Treatment Comparison

INTRODUCTION

Based on the results of KEYNOTE-048 (NCT02358031), first-line standard-of-care treatment for patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC) includes pembrolizumab alone or with platinum and fluorouracil (5-FU). Results from the single-arm KEYNOTE-B10 (NCT04489888) showed promising antitumor activity and a manageable safety profile offering an alternative pembrolizumab and chemotherapy regimen (KN-B10), with paclitaxel replacing 5-FU. With KEYNOTE-B10 being a non-comparative trial, this study aims to estimate the comparative efficacy of KN-B10 versus alternative first-line systemic treatments for R/M HNSCC via an indirect treatment comparison analysis.

METHODS

A systematic literature review (October 2023) identified six connected randomized controlled trials with similar eligibility criteria to KEYNOTE-B10. Interventions included cetuximab + platinum + 5-FU (EXTREME), cetuximab + cisplatin + docetaxel (TPEx), pembrolizumab + platinum + 5-FU (KN-048), platinum + 5-FU, cisplatin + paclitaxel, cisplatin, 5-FU, and methotrexate. To connect KEYNOTE-B10 to the network, individual patient-level data were weighted to match the population characteristics of the most similar trial in the network (KEYNOTE-048). The comparative efficacy of KN-B10 versus other interventions was estimated via fixed-effect Bayesian network meta-analyses. Due to violations of the proportional-hazards assumption, fractional polynomials were used to model overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

For objective response, KN-B10 was comparable to EXTREME and TPEx and more efficacious than all other identified treatments (range of odds ratios [ORs]: 1.69-11.75), including KN-048 (OR: 1.69; 95% credible interval: 1.01-2.81). For OS and PFS, KN-B10 was comparable to EXTREME (with improvements in OS after month 12), TPEx, and KN-048. KN-B10 improved OS versus platinum + 5-FU (range of time-varying hazard ratios: 0.60-0.18; months 9-60), cisplatin + paclitaxel (0.53-0.24; 9-36), cisplatin (0.59-0.32; 6-24), 5-FU (0.58-0.20; 6-36), and methotrexate (0.61-0.07; 6-60). KN-B10 improved PFS versus platinum + 5-FU (0.60-0.31; 3-36).

CONCLUSION

The improved or comparable efficacy of KN-B10 versus alternative first-line interventions in terms of relevant clinical outcomes, as shown in this study, supports its recommendations for the treatment of R/M HNSCC.

The Burden of Recurrent Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Across the United Kingdom: Results From a National Snapshot Study

BACKGROUND

To investigate the management of recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (rHNSCC) and describe survival outcomes.

METHODS

Post hoc subgroup analysis of a retrospective national observational cohort was conducted. All patients with rHNSCC who received a definitive treatment decision between September 1, 2021 and November 30, 2021 were included. Survival analysis was stratified according to subsite, primary versus recurrent disease, and surgical versus nonsurgical treatment.

RESULTS

Data from 202 rHNSCC patients were derived from a cohort of 1488 patients submitted by 50 UK centers. Median age was 66 years (IQR 58-74), and 142 (70.3%) were male. The most common recurrence subsites were oropharynx (20.5%), oral cavity (19.5%), larynx (16.4%), and hypopharynx (14.9%). Ninety-three (48.4%) were managed curatively. Surgery was the most common treatment for laryngeal (59.4%), oral cavity (60.5%), hypopharyngeal (44.8%), and oropharyngeal (37.5%) cancers. Two-year overall (OS), disease-free (DFS), disease-specific (DSS), and local recurrence free survival (LRFS) were 41.1%, 39.1%, 42.2%, and 39.3%, respectively. rHNSCC treated with surgery had improved OS (p = 0.0005), DFS (p = 0.012), DSS (p = 0.0003), and LRFS (p = 0.007), over nonsurgical treatments. Compared to primary cancers, rHNSCC presents with more advanced T stage (p < 0.001) and distant metastasis (p < 0.001), receives less curative treatment (p < 0.001), and has worse survival outcomes (all p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, salvage surgery, radiotherapy, and p16 status were independent prognostic factors of all survival outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Recurrent HNSCC is associated with high rates of incurable disease and worse survival than primary cancers. Surgery remains the most common curative treatment in rHNSCC, however future studies are necessary to improve patient selection and optimize outcomes following salvage treatment.

Immunohistochemical Expression of DAPK-1 in Oral Leukoplakia And Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Preliminary Study

INTRODUCTION

The silencing of death-associated protein kinase 1 (DAPK-1) is an effective way of inactivating a tumor-suppressing mechanism. The aim of this study was to investigate the immunohistochemical expression of DAPK-1 in oral leukoplakia (OL) and oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC).

METHODS

The immunohistochemical (IHC) detection of DAPK-1 was carried out in cases of OLs and OSCCs. DAPK-1 molecules' tissue distribution in OLs/OSCCs tissues was evaluated using semiquantitative immunohistochemistry in representative paraffin-embedded tissue samples (57 in total) from 2004-2019, retrieved from the archives of the Department of Oral Medicine/Pathology, School of Dentistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece and the St Lukas Hospital of Thessaloniki, Greece. The inclusion criterion was the presence of sufficient precancerous or cancerous biological material (estimated as more than 70% per tissue specimen) in the paraffin cubes. The exclusion criterion was the opposite, i.e. the lack of sufficient material due to previous sections. Statistics for IHC were evaluated by a non-parametric Mann-Whitney U Test. A two-sided p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

DAPK-1 IHC expression was increased in OLs without dysplasia and with OLs with mild dysplasia compared to moderate/severe dysplasia (p=0.019, Mann-Whitney U Test) and OSCCs (p=0.003, Mann-Whitney U Test).  Conclusions: DAPK-1 seemed to function as an oncosuppressor molecular biomarker, as its expression was decreased in areas of cellular dysplasia in OLs and in areas of OSCCs composed of less differentiated cells. The clinical application of this biomarker is that the positively stained, potentially malignant lesions are less likely to transition into malignancy, and cancerous lesions are more likely to behave non-aggressively. On the other hand, the lack of staining could signify the loss of this oncosuppressing ability, and it could be a potential prognostic biomarker for OSCC's aggressive biologic behavior if considered with other clinical parameters and a prognostic factor of malignant transformation of potentially malignant lesions. Since this is a preliminary study, more studies with larger sample sizes are required to support these conclusions.

Evaluating Cetuximab Regimens in Head and Neck Cancer: Insights from a Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness of cetuximab combination therapy in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer treated at a hospital in Southern Taiwan.

METHODS

This study analyzed a retrospective cohort of 67 patients who were treated between January 2020 and May 2024 with two cetuximab regimens, cetuximab combined with cisplatin and 5-Fu, which were administered every four weeks during hospitalization (CPF4) and every two weeks as outpatient treatment (CPF2), respectively. The clinical outcomes, including overall survival and progression-free survival (PFS), were compared across the treatment regimens and age groups using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox proportional hazard models.

RESULTS

The median overall survival was 11.1 months (95% confidence interval, 7.8-14.5), with CPF2 showing a potential PFS advantage in patients aged 46-60 years (p = 0.049). No significant differences in overall survival were observed between CPF2 and CPF4. CPF2, which was administered in an outpatient setting, was associated with improved convenience, reduced hospitalization, and potentially lower risks of hospital-acquired infections.

CONCLUSIONS

CPF2 exhibits practical advantages and comparable effectiveness, making it the preferred treatment regimen for eligible patients. Further studies with larger populations and molecular stratifications are needed to confirm these findings and develop better treatment strategies.

Practical Consensus Guidelines on the Use of Cetuximab in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC)

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is the most common malignancy group in India and several other low- and middle-income countries. Currently, majority of the patients present in advanced stage where systemic therapy is standard of care. Multiple relapses are also not uncommon. Almost all HNSCC tumors have epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) overexpression, making an attractive target. Cetuximab is the most successful method to target EGFR in HNSCC. After decades of its use, it still is a prominent part of the current management guidelines. Since other agents have also been proven to be useful, we felt it was necessary to develop a real-world consensus guideline to help the decision-making process among the community oncologists. Our expert committee therefore put together currently available data, insights from their real-world clinical practice, and voted to arrive at a consensus. These consensus guidelines represent how cetuximab should be used today in the management of HNSCC.

First‑line programmed cell death 1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy vs. standard treatment in patients with recurrent or metastatic oral squamous cell carcinoma: A retrospective cohort study

Programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) inhibitor revives the killing effect of immune cells to prevent tumor progression. The present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of first-line PD-1 inhibitor + chemotherapy vs. standard treatment in recurrent or metastatic (R/M) oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). A total of 51 patients with R/M OSCC were reviewed and divided into the PD-1 inhibitor + chemotherapy (n=21) and standard treatment (n=30) groups based on their actual treatments. The results of the present study demonstrated that the objective response rate (52.4 vs. 36.7%, P=0.265) and disease control rate (81.0 vs. 70.0%, P=0.377) were numerically elevated in the PD-1 inhibitor + chemotherapy group compared with those in the standard treatment group; however, the results did not reach statistical significance. The progression-free survival (PFS) was numerically increased (without statistical significance) in the PD-1 inhibitor + chemotherapy group compared with that of the standard treatment group (P=0.057). Specifically, the PD-1 inhibitor + chemotherapy group and the standard treatment group exhibited a median [95% confidence interval (CI)] PFS duration of 6.7 (1.6-11.8) and 5.2 (3.4-7.0) months, respectively. In addition, the PD-1 inhibitor + chemotherapy group demonstrated increased overall survival (OS) compared with that of the standard treatment group (P=0.032). Specifically, the PD-1 inhibitor + chemotherapy group and the standard treatment group exhibited a median (95% CI) OS duration of 18.3 (11.9-24.7) and 10.3 (7.9-12.7) months, respectively. Furthermore, multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that PD-1 inhibitor + chemotherapy was independently associated with improved PFS [hazard ratio (HR)=0.308, P=0.002] and OS (HR=0.252, P=0.003). In addition, the incidence of grade 3-5 adverse events (AEs) was relatively low in both groups and the incidence of any grade of each AE was not significantly different between groups (all P>0.050). In conclusion, the first-line PD-1 inhibitor + chemotherapy group had improved efficacy and comparable safety compared with those of the standard treatment in patients with R/M OSCC.

Skin Toxicity as a Predictor of Survival in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients Treated with Anti-EGFR: Fact or Fallacy?

The primary treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) consists of targeted therapy and chemotherapy to improve survival. A molecular target drug with an anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antagonist is recommended when the RAS and BRAF genes are normal. About 50–70% of patients using anti-EGFR antagonists will experience skin reactions. Some studies have shown that severe skin reactions caused by anti-EGFR antagonists may be linked to overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), but the results are still uncertain. These data of mCRC patients who underwent anti-EGFR therapy between October 2017 and October 2018 were analyzed retrospectively. A total of 111 patients were included in this study. The survival results showed that gender, age, body mass index, primary tumor site, and recurrence did not significantly affect OS and PFS. However, the first-line anti-EGFR inhibitor treatment was significantly associated with OS (p < 0.001) and PFS (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the incidence of acne between males and females in grades 1 and 2, while males have a greater risk in grades 3 and 4 than females (20.3 vs. 4.8%; p-value = 0.041). Skin toxicity was not a predictor of anti-EGFR treatment response in this investigation.

The Role of Different Immunocompetent Cell Populations in the Pathogenesis of Head and Neck Cancer-Regulatory Mechanisms of Pro- and Anti-Cancer Activity and Their Impact on Immunotherapy

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is one of the most aggressive and heterogeneous groups of human neoplasms. HNSCC is characterized by high morbidity, accounting for 3% of all cancers, and high mortality with ~1.5% of all cancer deaths. It was the most common cancer worldwide in 2020, according to the latest GLOBOCAN data, representing the seventh most prevalent human malignancy. Despite great advances in surgical techniques and the application of modern combinations and cytotoxic therapies, HNSCC remains a leading cause of death worldwide with a low overall survival rate not exceeding 40-60% of the patient population. The most common causes of death in patients are its frequent nodal metastases and local neoplastic recurrences, as well as the relatively low response to treatment and severe drug resistance. Much evidence suggests that the tumour microenvironment (TME), tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and circulating various subpopulations of immunocompetent cells, such regulatory T cells (CD4+CD25+Foxp3+Tregs), cytotoxic CD3+CD8+ T cells (CTLs) and CD3+CD4+ T helper type 1/2/9/17 (Th1/Th2/Th9/Th17) lymphocytes, T follicular helper cells (Tfh) and CD56dim/CD16bright activated natural killer cells (NK), carcinoma-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), tumour-associated neutrophils (N1/N2 TANs), as well as tumour-associated macrophages (M1/M2 phenotype TAMs) can affect initiation, progression and spread of HNSCC and determine the response to immunotherapy. Rapid advances in the field of immuno-oncology and the constantly growing knowledge of the immunosuppressive mechanisms and effects of tumour cancer have allowed for the use of effective and personalized immunotherapy as a first-line therapeutic procedure or an essential component of a combination therapy for primary, relapsed and metastatic HNSCC. This review presents the latest reports and molecular studies regarding the anti-tumour role of selected subpopulations of immunocompetent cells in the pathogenesis of HNSCC, including HPV+ve (HPV+) and HPV-ve (HPV-) tumours. The article focuses on the crucial regulatory mechanisms of pro- and anti-tumour activity, key genetic or epigenetic changes that favour tumour immune escape, and the strategies that the tumour employs to avoid recognition by immunocompetent cells, as well as resistance mechanisms to T and NK cell-based immunotherapy in HNSCC. The present review also provides an overview of the pre- and clinical early trials (I/II phase) and phase-III clinical trials published in this arena, which highlight the unprecedented effectiveness and limitations of immunotherapy in HNSCC, and the emerging issues facing the field of HNSCC immuno-oncology.

HRAS Mutations Define a Distinct Subgroup in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

PURPOSE

In head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), HRAS mutation is a new actionable oncogene driver. We aimed to evaluate HRAS mutational variants, comutation profile, and survival outcomes of this molecularly defined population.

METHODS

We leveraged four deidentified patient data sets with HRAS-mutant HNSCC, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Kura Oncology, Inc trial, Foundation Medicine, and American Association for Cancer Research GENIE v.12. Patient demographic information and clinical courses were extracted, when available, in addition to HRAS mutation type and co-occurring mutations. Survival outcomes were analyzed (Kaplan-Meier method).

RESULTS

Two hundred forty-nine patients with HRAS-mutant HNSCC were identified from the four data sets. Median age ranged from 55 to 65 years, with a higher frequency in male patients (64%); the majority of HRAS-mutant HNSCC occurred in human papillomavirus-negative HNSCC. HRAS mutation patterns were similar across data sets; G12S was the most common (29%). Treatment responses to tipifarnib were not codon-specific. Compared with wild-type, significantly co-occurring mutations with HRAS were Casp8 (Fisher's exact test, P < .00013), TERT (P < .0085), and NOTCH1 (P < .00013). Analysis of clinical courses from the MD Anderson Cancer Center and Kura Oncology, Inc data sets demonstrated poor clinical outcomes with a high rate of recurrence following primary definitive treatment (50%-67% relapse < 6 months) and short disease-free survival (4.0 months; 95% CI, 1.0 to 36.0) and overall survival (OS; 15.0 months; 95% CI, 6.0 to 52.0). Use of tipifarnib in this data set demonstrated improved OS (25.5 months; 95% CI, 18.0 to 48.0).

CONCLUSION

Oncogenic mutations in HRAS occur in 3%-4% of HNSCC, with G12S being the most frequent. Without targeted therapy, patients with HRAS-mutant HNSCC had poor clinic outcomes; observable trend toward improvement in OS has been noted in cohorts receiving treatments such as tipifarnib. The comutation pattern of HRAS-mutant in HNSCC is distinct, which may provide insight to future therapeutic combination strategies.

The EXTREME Regimen Associating Cetuximab and Cisplatin Favors Head and Neck Cancer Cell Death and Immunogenicity with the Induction of an Anti-Cancer Immune Response

(1) Background: The first line of treatment for recurrent/metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC) has recently evolved with the approval of immunotherapies that target the anti-PD-1 immune checkpoint. However, only about 20% of the patients display a long-lasting objective tumor response. The modulation of cancer cell immunogenicity via a treatment-induced immunogenic cell death is proposed to potentially be able to improve the rate of patients who respond to immune checkpoint blocking immunotherapies. (2) Methods: Using human HNSCC cell line models and a mouse oral cancer syngeneic model, we have analyzed the ability of the EXTREME regimen (combination therapy using the anti-EGFR cetuximab antibody and platinum-based chemotherapy) to modify the immunogenicity of HNSCC cells. (3) Results: We showed that the combination of cetuximab and cisplatin reduces cell growth through both cell cycle inhibition and the induction of apoptotic cell death independently of p53. In addition, different components of the EXTREME regimen were found to induce, to a variable extent, and in a cell-dependent manner, the emission of mediators of immunogenic cell death, including calreticulin, HMGB1, and type I Interferon-responsive chemokines. Interestingly, cetuximab alone or combined with the IC₅₀ dose of cisplatin can induce an antitumor immune response in vivo, but not when combined with a high dose of cisplatin. (4) Conclusions: Our observations suggest that the EXTREME protocol or cetuximab alone are capable, under conditions of moderate apoptosis induction, of eliciting the mobilization of the immune system and an anti-tumor immune response in HNSCC.

[Study on the indication of concurrent chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced laryngeal carcinoma]

Laryngeal cancer is one of the most common malignant cancer of the head and neck. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy is considered by the NCCN guideline to be the most effective organ protection strategy for locally advanced laryngeal cancer, which can preserve the larynx without reducing the survival rate of patients. Patients with non-T4 （T1-3） and high lymph node burden （N2-3） laryngeal cancer can benefit from concurrent chemoradiotherapy, which are more suitable for concurrent chemoradiotherapy than locally advanced laryngeal cancer with other stages. The indications of concurrent chemoradiotherapy were further discussed in this paper.

A Novel CXCR4-Targeted Diphtheria Toxin Nanoparticle Inhibits Invasion and Metastatic Dissemination in a Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Mouse Model

Loco-regional recurrences and metastasis represent the leading causes of death in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients, highlighting the need for novel therapies. Chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4) has been related to loco-regional and distant recurrence and worse patient prognosis. In this regard, we developed a novel protein nanoparticle, T22-DITOX-H6, aiming to selectively deliver the diphtheria toxin cytotoxic domain to CXCR4⁺ HNSCC cells. The antimetastatic effect of T22-DITOX-H6 was evaluated in vivo in an orthotopic mouse model. IVIS imaging system was utilized to assess the metastatic dissemination in the mouse model. Immunohistochemistry and histopathological analyses were used to study the CXCR4 expression in the cancer cells, to evaluate the effect of the nanotoxin treatment, and its potential off-target toxicity. In this study, we report that CXCR4⁺ cancer cells were present in the invasive tumor front in an orthotopic mouse model. Upon repeated T22-DITOX-H6 administration, the number of CXCR4⁺ cancer cells was significantly reduced. Similarly, nanotoxin treatment effectively blocked regional and distant metastatic dissemination in the absence of systemic toxicity in the metastatic HNSCC mouse model. The repeated administration of T22-DITOX-H6 clearly abrogates tumor invasiveness and metastatic dissemination without inducing any off-target toxicity. Thus, T22-DITOX-H6 holds great promise for the treatment of CXCR4⁺ HNSCC patients presenting worse prognosis.