Real-world patterns of biomarker testing and targeted therapy in de novo metastatic non-small cell lung cancer patients in the US oncology network

Real-World Analysis of Disparities in Biomarker Testing and Use of Recommended Targeted Therapies in Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in the United States

PURPOSE

Guidelines recommend biomarker testing and biomarker-informed therapies in patients with metastatic non-small cell cancer (mNSCLC); however, the use remains suboptimal.

METHODS

To understand contemporary testing and treatment patterns, retrospective data from 42,037 patients with mNSCLC in a nationwide electronic health record-derived deidentified database from January 2011 to April 2023 were used to quantify testing rates, test positivity, and use of biomarker-informed therapies, stratified by key demographics to identify potential disparities. Multivariable logistic regression was conducted to include patient characteristics associated with the receipt of biomarker testing and subsequent biomarker-informed therapies.

RESULTS

A total of 34,510 patients (82.1%) received ≥one biomarker test(s). Biomarker testing and use of biomarker-informed therapies increased for all studied biomarkers (EGFR, ALK, ROS1, PD-L1, BRAF, RET, MET) over time, with highest rates observed in 2023: EGFR (88.7% and 79.5%, respectively) and ALK (87.7% and 84.3%, respectively). In multivariate logistic regression, patient sex, race, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group at baseline, insurance type, smoking status at baseline, and histology were all significantly associated with odds of receiving biomarker testing. Covariates statistically associated with receipt of biomarker-informed therapy varied by biomarker without a clear pattern of association. Although the use of biomarker testing and biomarker-informed therapies has increased in recent years, gaps and potential disparities remain.

CONCLUSION

Analysis of contemporary trends in biomarker testing and use of targeted therapies in mNSCLC in the United States highlight improvements in recent years. However, these rates remain suboptimal in specific strata of the patient population, including differences in racial groups and insurance groups, indicating further work is needed to bridge remaining gaps.

The Impact of Next-Generation Sequencing Workflows on Outcomes in Advanced Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis at One Academic Health System

PURPOSE

Broad-based molecular testing with next-generation sequencing (NGS) is now the standard of care in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Two approaches to molecular testing are (1) reflexive testing at pathologic NSCLC confirmation, often using an in-house molecular panel, and (2) send-out testing to private vendors, ordered by a clinician. This study explored the outcomes with reflex versus send-out testing.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted of patients diagnosed with de novo stage IV NSCLC in 2019 and 2020 at three hospitals in the same system, one academic hospital (Northwestern Memorial Hospital, or NMH) utilizing reflex, in-house NGS, and two community-based hospitals (Central DuPage Hospital, or CDH, and Delnor, or D) sending out tissue samples for testing. The outcomes assessed were the time from biopsy to results, biopsy to treatment, the incidence of first-line targetable mutations and the use of first-line targeted therapies, and overall survival.

RESULTS

In total, 191 patients met the inclusion criteria, 85 at NMH, 106 at CDH + D, and in total, 131 in 2019 and 60 in 2020. The time to results was significantly shorter with reflexive NGS when compared with send-out testing; the time to treatment was also shorter but not statistically significant. At CDH + D, the time to results was significantly shorter with a limited panel than with comprehensive testing, but the time to treatment was similar. NGS testing rates were 95% at NMH and 84.5% at CDH + D (p = 0.009), with 31.0% at NMH receiving 1L targeted therapies versus 20.8% at CDH + D (p = 0.08). In 2019, the median time from biopsy to treatment was 35 days at NMH and 38 days at CDH and Delnor; in 2020, time to treatment was 26 days and 37 days, respectively. Overall survival trended longer in 2020 relative to 2019 independent of site.

CONCLUSION

Reflexive NGS testing is associated with a shorter time to actionable results and higher rates of first-line targetable mutations than send-out testing. In practices with send-out testing, limited panels had slightly faster turnaround times but no difference in time to treatment. If resources allow, reflexive NGS should be considered in healthcare systems for patients with NSCLC.

Prevalence of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor and Programmed Death Ligand 1 Testing in a Population-Based Lung Cancer Surgical Resection Cohort from 2018 to 2022

BACKGROUND

Biomarker-directed therapy requires biomarker testing. We assessed the patterns of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and programmed death ligand 1 (PDL1) testing in a non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) resection cohort. We hypothesized that testing would increase but be unevenly distributed across patient-, provider- and institution-level demographics.

METHODS

We examined the population-based Mid-South Quality of Surgical Resection (MS-QSR) cohort of NSCLC resections. We evaluated the proportions receiving EGFR and PDL1 testing before and after approval of biomarker-directed adjuvant therapy (2018-2020 vs. 2021-2022). We used association tests and logistic regression to compare factors.

RESULTS

From 2018 to 2022, 1,687 patients had NSCLC resection across 12 MS-QSR institutions: 1,045 (62%) from 2018 to 2020 and 642 (38%) from 2021 to 2022. From 2018 to 2020, 11% had EGFR testing versus 38% in 2021 to 2022 (56% in those meeting ADAURA trial inclusion criteria, P < 0.0001). From 2018 to 2020, 8% had PDL1 testing versus 20% in 2021 to 2022 (P < 0.0001). EGFR testing did not significantly differ by age (P = 0.07), sex (P = 0.99), race (P = 0.33), or smoking history (P = 0.28); PDL1 testing did not differ significantly by age (P = 0.47), sex (P = 0.41), race (P = 0.51), or health insurance (P = 0.07). Testing was significantly less likely in nonteaching and non-Commission on Cancer-accredited hospitals and after resection by cardiothoracic or general surgeons (vs. general thoracic surgeons; all P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

EGFR and PDL1 testing increased after approval of biomarker-directed adjuvant therapies. However, testing rates were still suboptimal and differed by institutional- and provider-level factors.

IMPACT

The association of institutional, pathologist, and surgeon characteristics with differences in testing demonstrate the need for more standardization in testing processes.

The Importance of Biomarker Testing in the Treatment of Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Podcast

The identification of actionable biomarkers and development of targeted therapies have revolutionized the field of lung cancer treatment. In patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), biomarker testing can inform selection of effective targeted therapies as well as avoid therapies that are less likely to be effective in certain populations. A growing number of actionable targets, including those involving EGFR, ALK, ROS1, BRAF, MET, KRAS, NTRK, RET, HER2, and PD-L1, can be identified with biomarker testing. More than half of patients with advanced NSCLC have tumors that harbor genetic alterations that can be targeted. When these patients are treated with targeted therapy, survival and quality of life may be significantly improved. In addition, broad-based molecular testing may detect alterations identifying patients who are potentially eligible for current or future clinical trials. Comprehensive biomarker testing rates in communities are often low, and turnaround times for results can be unacceptably long. There is an unmet need for widespread, efficient, and routine testing of all biomarkers recommended by clinical guidelines. New testing techniques and technologies can make this an attainable goal. Panel-based sequencing platforms are becoming more accessible, and molecular biomarker analysis of circulating tumor DNA is becoming more common. In this podcast, we discuss the importance of biomarker testing in advanced NSCLC and explore topics such as testing methodologies, effect of biomarker testing on patient outcomes, emerging technologies, and strategies for improving testing rates in the United States. Supplementary file1 (MP4 121301 KB).

Real-world outcomes on platinum-containing chemotherapy for EGFR-mutated advanced nonsquamous NSCLC with prior exposure to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors

Background

Front-line therapy with an EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) is the standard of care for treating patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC with the common sensitizing EGFR exon 19 deletion and exon 21 L858R point mutations. However, EGFR TKI resistance inevitably develops. The optimal subsequent therapy remains to be identified, although platinum-containing chemotherapy regimens are often administered. Our objectives were to describe baseline characteristics, survival, and subsequent treatment patterns for patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC with EGFR exon 19 deletion or L858R mutation who received a platinum-based combination regimen after front-line EGFR TKI therapy.

Methods

This retrospective study used a nationwide electronic health record-derived deidentified database to select adult patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC, evidence of EGFR exon 19 deletion or L858R mutation, and ECOG performance status of 0-2 who initiated platinum-containing chemotherapy, with or without concomitant immunotherapy, from 1-January-2011 to 30-June-2020 following receipt of any EGFR TKI as first-line therapy or, alternatively, a first- or second-generation EGFR TKI (erlotinib, afatinib, gefitinib, dacomitinib) as first-line therapy followed by the third-generation EGFR TKI osimertinib as second-line therapy. Data cut-off was 30-June-2022. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate overall survival (OS) after initiation of pemetrexed-platinum (n=119) or any platinum-based combination regimen (platinum cohort; n=311).

Results

The two cohorts included two-thirds women (65%-66%) and 57%-58% nonsmokers; median ages were 66 and 65 years in pemetrexed-platinum and platinum cohorts, respectively. Median OS was 10.3 months (95% CI, 8.1-13.9) from pemetrexed-platinum initiation and 12.4 months (95% CI, 10.2-15.2) from platinum initiation; 12-month survival rates were 48% and 51%, respectively; 260 patients (84%) had died by the end of the study.

Conclusion

The suboptimal survival outcomes recorded in this study demonstrate the unmet need to identify more effective subsequent treatment regimens for patients with EGFR-mutated advanced nonsquamous NSCLC after EGFR TKI resistance develops.

Development and Update of Guideline-based Quality Indicators in Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

In 2022, an update of the German lung cancer guideline, first published in 2010 and revised in 2018, was released. This article aims to show the process of updating, developing, and implementing guideline-based quality indicators (QI) into the certification system for lung cancer centers (LCC).

METHODS

A multidisciplinary and interprofessional working group revised the guideline QIs from 2018 using the strong recommendations of the guideline update, a systematic review for QIs, and the results of the implemented QIs from LCC.

RESULTS

For 4 out of 8 indicators from the 2018 guideline, the LCC showed an improved implementation of the requirements in the last 3 years (2018-2020). For 3 indicators, the median of the results was constant at a very high level (≥96% or 100%). Only the "adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy" indicator showed declining values between 2018 and 2020. The target values and plausibility limits were well achieved by LCC. After updating the guideline, one QI from 2018 was not included in the new QI set due to the small denominator population. Based on the new strong recommendations, 8 new QIs were defined. From the QI set of the guideline update, 13 of 15 indicators (7 since 2018 and 6 from 2022 on) were adopted into the certification program.

CONCLUSIONS

The guideline recommendations are implemented by LCC at a high level. The process presented confirms the successful implementation of the so-called quality cycle in oncology. The QIs developed by the German Guideline Program in Oncology (GGPO) are adopted by the certification program. The implementation of the QI is measured in LCC, evaluated by the German Cancer Society (DKG), and reflected back to the GGPO. The "real world" data have led to the deletion of one QI and show a high implementation of most QIs in LCC.

Analysis of the efficacy of upfront brain radiotherapy versus deferred radiotherapy for EGFR/ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer with brain metastases: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

For brain metastases (BMs) from EGFR/ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the best time to administer tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and brain radiotherapy (RT) has not been identified. This analysis was an attempt to solve this problem in part.

METHODS

A total of 163 patients with EGFR/ALK-positive NSCLC and brain metastasis (BM) who were diagnosed between January 2017 and July 2022 were included in this study. Ninety-one patients underwent upfront RT, and 72 patients received deferred RT. Comparing the clinical efficacy and safety in these two patient cohorts was the main goal of the study.

RESULTS

The average follow-up period was 20.5 months (range 2.0 to 91.9 months). The median overall survival (OS) was 26.5 months, and the median intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS) was 23.6 months. Upfront RT considerably increased the iPFS (26.9 vs. 20.2 months, hazard ratio [HR] = 5.408, P = 0.020) and OS (31.2 vs. 22.3 months, HR = 4.667, P = 0.031) compared to deferred RT. According to multivariate analysis, upfront RT was an independent risk factor for predicting iPFS (HR = 1.670, P = 0.021). Upfront RT (HR = 1.531, P = 0.044), TKI therapy (HR = 0.423, P < 0.001), and oligometastases (HR = 2.052, P = 0.021) were found to be independent risk factors for OS.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that upfront RT combined with TKI treatment can significantly improve intracranial disease management and prolong survival in patients with EGFR/ALK mutations in BMs from NSCLC.

EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors for the Treatment of Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Harboring Uncommon EGFR Mutations: A Podcast

Supplementary file1 (MP4 21169 KB).

Lung cancer organoids: models for preclinical research and precision medicine

Lung cancer is a malignancy with high incidence and mortality rates globally, and it has a 5-year survival rate of only 10%-20%. The significant heterogeneity in clinical presentation, histological features, multi-omics findings, and drug sensitivity among different lung cancer patients necessitate the development of personalized treatment strategies. The current precision medicine for lung cancer, primarily based on pathological and genomic multi-omics testing, fails to meet the needs of patients with clinically refractory lung cancer. Lung cancer organoids (LCOs) are derived from tumor cells within tumor tissues and are generated through three-dimensional tissue culture, enabling them to faithfully recapitulate in vivo tumor characteristics and heterogeneity. The establishment of a series of LCOs biobanks offers promising platforms for efficient screening and identification of novel targets for anti-tumor drug discovery. Moreover, LCOs provide supplementary decision-making factors to enhance the current precision medicine for lung cancer, thereby addressing the limitations associated with pathology-guided approaches in managing refractory lung cancer. This article presents a comprehensive review on the construction methods and potential applications of LCOs in both preclinical and clinical research. It highlights the significance of LCOs in biomarker exploration, drug resistance investigation, target identification, clinical precision drug screening, as well as microfluidic technology-based high-throughput drug screening strategies. Additionally, it discusses the current limitations and future prospects of this field.

The role of brain radiotherapy for EGFR- and ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer with brain metastases: a review

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is frequently complicated by central nervous system (CNS) metastases affecting patients' life expectancy and quality. At the present clinical trials including neurosurgery, radiotherapy (RT) and systemic treatments alone or in combination have provided controversial results. CNS involvement is even more frequent in NSCLC patients with EGFR activating mutations or ALK rearrangement suggesting a role of target therapy in the upfront treatment in place of loco-regionals treatments (i.e. RT and/or surgery). So far clinical research has not explored the potential role of accurate brain imaging (i.e. MRI instead of the routine total-body contrast CT and/or PET/CT staging) to identify patients that could benefit of local therapies. Moreover, for patients who require concomitant RT there are no clear guidelines on the timing of intervention with respect to innovative precision medicine approaches with Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors, ALK-inhibitors and/or immuno-oncological therapies. On this basis the present review describes the therapeutic strategies integrating medical and radiation oncology in patients with metastatic NSCLC (mNSCLC) adenocarcinoma with CNS involvement and EGFR activating mutations or ALK rearrangement.

Real-World Data on EGFR and ALK Testing and TKI Usage in Norway-A Nation-Wide Population Study

Clinical studies have shown the efficacy of EGFR- and ALK-directed therapies in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Real-world data on, e.g., testing patterns, uptake, and duration of treatment are scarce. Reflex EGFR and ALK testing of non-squamous NSCLCs were implemented in Norwegian guidelines in 2010 and 2013, respectively. We present a complete national registry data on incidence, pathology procedures, and drug prescription in the period of 2013 to 2020. Test rates for both EGFR and ALK increased over time and were 85% and 89%, respectively, at the end of the study period, independent of age up to 85 years. The positivity rate for EGFR was higher among females and young patients, whereas no sex difference was observed for ALK. EGFR-treated patients were older than ALK-treated patients (71 vs. 63 years at start, p < 0.001). Male ALK-treated patients were significantly younger than females at the start of treatment (58 vs. 65 years, p = 0.019). The time from the first dispensation to the last dispensation of TKI (as a surrogate for progression-free survival) was shorter for EGFR- than for ALK-TKI, and survival for both EGFR- and ALK-positive patients was substantially longer than for non-mutated patients. We found a high adherence to molecular testing guidelines, good concordance of mutation positivity and treatment, and the real-world replication of findings in clinical trials, indicating that the relevant patients are provided substantially life-prolonging therapy.

Plasma-first: accelerating lung cancer diagnosis and molecular profiling through liquid biopsy

Introduction:

Molecular profiling of tumor tissue is the gold standard for treatment decision-making in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Results may be delayed or unavailable due to insufficient tissue, prolonged wait times for biopsy, pathology assessment and testing. We piloted the use of plasma testing in the initial diagnostic workup for patients with suspected advanced lung cancer.

Methods:

Patients with ⩽15 pack-year smoking history and suspected advanced lung cancer referred to the lung cancer rapid diagnostic program underwent plasma circulating-tumor DNA testing using a DNA-based mutation panel. Tissue testing was performed per standard of care, including comprehensive next-generation sequencing (NGS). The primary endpoint was time from diagnostic program referral to cancer treatment in stage IV NSCLC patients (Cohort A) compared to a contemporary cohort not enrolled in the study (Cohort B) and an historical pre-COVID cohort referred to the program between 2018 and 2019 (Cohort C).

Results:

From January to June 2021, 20 patients were enrolled in Cohort A; median age was 70.5 years (range 33–87), 70% were female, 55% Caucasian, 85% never smokers, and 75% were diagnosed with NSCLC. Seven had actionable alterations detected in plasma or tissue (4/7 concordant). Fusions, not tested in plasma, were identified by immunohistochemistry for three patients. Mean result turnaround time was 17.8 days for plasma NGS and 23.6 days for tissue (p = 0.10). Mean time from referral to treatment initiation was significantly shorter in cohort A at 32.6 days (SD 13.1) versus 62.2 days (SD 31.2) in cohort B and 61.5 days (SD 29.1) in cohort C, both p < 0.0001.

Conclusion:

Liquid biopsy in the initial diagnostic workup of patients with suspected advanced NSCLC can lead to faster molecular results and shorten time to treatment even with smaller DNA panels. An expansion study using comprehensive NGS plasma testing with faster turnaround time is ongoing (NCT04862924).

Current treatments for non-small cell lung cancer

Despite improved methods of diagnosis and the development of different treatments, mortality from lung cancer remains surprisingly high. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for the large majority of lung cancer cases. Therefore, it is important to review current methods of diagnosis and treatments of NSCLC in the clinic and preclinic. In this review, we describe, as a guide for clinicians, current diagnostic methods and therapies (such as chemotherapy, chemoradiotherapy, targeted therapy, antiangiogenic therapy, immunotherapy, and combination therapy) for NSCLC.