Implementing cone-beam computed tomography-guided online adaptive radiotherapy in cervical cancer

Pelvic target volume inter-fractional motion during radiotherapy for cervical cancer with daily iterative cone beam computed tomography

BACKGROUND

Tumor regression and organ movements indicate that a large margin is used to ensure target volume coverage during radiotherapy. This study aimed to quantify inter-fractional movements of the uterus and cervix in patients with cervical cancer undergoing radiotherapy and to evaluate the clinical target volume (CTV) coverage.

METHODS

This study analyzed 303 iterative cone beam computed tomography (iCBCT) scans from 15 cervical cancer patients undergoing external beam radiotherapy. CTVs of the uterus (CTV-U) and cervix (CTV-C) contours were delineated based on each iCBCT image. CTV-U encompassed the uterus, while CTV-C included the cervix, vagina, and adjacent parametrial regions. Compared with the planning CTV, the movement of CTV-U and CTV-C in the anterior-posterior, superior-inferior, and lateral directions between iCBCT scans was measured. Uniform expansions were applied to the planning CTV to assess target coverage.

RESULTS

The motion (mean ± standard deviation) in the CTV-U position was 8.3 ± 4.1 mm in the left, 9.8 ± 4.4 mm in the right, 12.6 ± 4.0 mm in the anterior, 8.8 ± 5.1 mm in the posterior, 5.7 ± 5.4 mm in the superior, and 3.0 ± 3.2 mm in the inferior direction. The mean CTV-C displacement was 7.3 ± 3.2 mm in the left, 8.6 ± 3.8 mm in the right, 9.0 ± 6.1 mm in the anterior, 8.4 ± 3.6 mm in the posterior, 5.0 ± 5.0 mm in the superior, and 3.0 ± 2.5 mm in the inferior direction. Compared with the other tumor (T) stages, CTV-U and CTV-C motion in stage T1 was larger. A uniform CTV planning treatment volume margin of 15 mm failed to encompass the CTV-U and CTV-C in 11.1% and 2.2% of all fractions, respectively. The mean volume change of CTV-U and CTV-C were 150% and 51%, respectively, compared with the planning CTV.

CONCLUSIONS

Movements of the uterine corpus are larger than those of the cervix. The likelihood of missing the CTV is significantly increased due to inter-fractional motion when utilizing traditional planning margins. Early T stage may require larger margins. Personal radiotherapy margining is needed to improve treatment accuracy.

ROAR-A: re-optimization based Online Adaptive Radiotherapy of anal cancer, a prospective phase II trial protocol

BACKGROUND

Chemo-radiotherapy with curative intent for anal cancer has high complete remission rates, but acute treatment-related gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity is significant. Toxicity occurs due to irradiation of surrounding normal tissue. Current radiotherapy requires the addition of large planning margins to the radiation field to ensure target coverage regardless of the considerable organ motion in the pelvic region. This increases the irradiated volume and radiation dose to the surrounding normal tissue and thereby toxicity. Online adaptive radiotherapy uses artificial intelligence to adjust the treatment to the anatomy of the day. This allows for the reduction of planning margins, minimizing the irradiated volume and thereby radiation to the surrounding normal tissue.This study examines if cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)-guided oART with daily automated treatment re-planning can reduce acute gastrointestinal toxicity in patients with anal cancer.

METHODS/DESIGN

The study is a prospective, single-arm, phase II trial conducted at Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev and Gentofte, Denmark. 205 patients with local only or locally advanced anal cancer, referred for radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy with curative intent, are planned for inclusion. Toxicity and quality of life are reported with Common Terminology Criteria of Adverse Events and patient-reported outcome questionnaires, before, during, and after treatment. The primary endpoint is a reduction in the incidence of acute treatment-related grade ≥ 2 diarrhea from 36 to 25% after daily online adaptive radiotherapy compared to standard radiotherapy. Secondary endpoints include all acute and late toxicity, overall survival, and reduction in treatment interruptions.

RESULTS

Accrual began in January 2022 and is expected to finish in January 2026. Primary endpoint results are expected to be available in April 2026.

DISCUSSION

This is the first study utilizing online adaptive radiotherapy to treat anal cancer. We hope to determine whether there is a clinical benefit for the patients, with significant reductions in acute GI toxicity without compromising treatment efficacy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05438836. Danish Ethical Committee: H-21028093.

Prospects for daily online adaptive radiotherapy for cervical cancer: Auto-contouring evaluation and dosimetric outcomes

BACKGROUND

Training senior radiation therapists as "adapters" to manage influencers and target editing is critical in daily online adaptive radiotherapy (oART) for cervical cancer. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and dosimetric outcomes of automatic contouring and identify the key areas for modification.

METHODS

A total of 125 oART fractions from five postoperative cervical cancer patients and 140 oART fractions from five uterine cervical cancer patients treated with daily iCBCT-guided oART were enrolled in this prospective study. The same adaptive treatments were replanned using the Ethos automatic contours workflow without manual contouring edits. The clinical target volume (CTV) was subdivided into several separate regions, and the average surface distance dice (ASD), centroid deviation, dice similarity coefficient (DSC), and 95% Hausdorff distance (95% HD) were used to evaluate contouring for the above portions. Dosimetric results from automatic oART plans were compared to supervised oART plans to evaluate target volumes and organs at risk (OARs) dose changes.

RESULTS

Overall, the paired CTV had high overlap rates, with an average DSC value greater than 0.75. The uterus had the largest consistency differences, with ASD, centroid deviation, and 95% HD being 2.67 ± 1.79 mm, 17.17 ± 12 mm, and 10.45 ± 5.68 mm, respectively. The consistency differences of the lower nodal CTVleft and nodal CTVright were relatively large, with ASD, centroid deviation, and 95% HD being 0.59 ± 0.53 mm, 3.6 ± 2.67 mm, and 5.41 ± 4.08 mm, and 0.59 ± 0.51 mm, 3.6 ± 2.54 mm, and 4.7 ± 1.57 mm, respectively. The automatic online-adapted plan met the clinical requirements of dosimetric coverage for the target volume and improved the OAR dosimetry.

CONCLUSIONS

The accuracy of automatic contouring from the Ethos adaptive platform is considered clinically acceptable for cervical cancer, and the uterus, upper vaginal cuff, and lower nodal CTV are the areas that need to be focused on in training.

Evaluation of PTV margins with daily iterative online adaptive radiotherapy for postoperative treatment of endometrial and cervical cancer: a prospective single-arm phase 2 study

BACKGROUND

To determine the optimal planning target volume (PTV) margins for adequate coverage by daily iterative cone-beam computed tomography (iCBCT)-guided online adaptive radiotherapy (oART) in postoperative treatment of endometrial and cervical cancer and the benefit of reducing PTV margins.

METHODS

Fifteen postoperative endometrial and cervical cancer patients treated with daily iCBCT-guided oART were enrolled in this prospective phase 2 study. Pre- and posttreatment iCBCT images of 125 fractions from 5 patients were obtained as a training cohort, and clinical target volumes (CTV) were contoured separately. Uniform three-dimensional expansions were applied to the PTVpre to assess the minimum margin required to encompass the CTVpost. The dosimetric advantages of the proposed online adaptive margins were compared with conventional margin plans (7-15 mm) using an oART emulator in another cohort of 125 iCBCT scans. A CTV-to-PTV expansion was verified on a validation cohort of 253 fractions from 10 patients, and further margin reduction and acute toxicity were studied.

RESULTS

The average time from pretreatment iCBCT to posttreatment iCBCT was 22 min. A uniform PTV margin of 5 mm could encompass nodal CTVpost in 100% of the fractions (175/175) and vaginal CTVpost in 98% of the fractions (172/175). The margin of 5 mm was verified in our validation cohort, and the nodal PTV margin could be further reduced to 4 mm if ≥ 95% CTV coverage was predicted to be achieved. The adapted plan with a 5 mm margin significantly improved pelvic organ-at-risk dosimetry compared with the conventional margin plan. Grade 3 toxicities were observed in only one patient with leukopenia, and no patients experienced acute urinary toxicity.

CONCLUSION

In the postoperative treatment of endometrial and cervical cancer, oART could reduce PTV margins to 5 mm, which significantly decrease the dose to critical organs at risk and potentially lead to a lower incidence of acute toxicity.

The accuracy of artificial intelligence deformed nodal structures in cervical online cone-beam-based adaptive radiotherapy

Background and Purpose

Online cone-beam-based adaptive radiotherapy (ART) adjusts for anatomical changes during external beam radiotherapy. However, limited cone-beam image quality complicates nodal contouring. Despite this challenge, artificial-intelligence guided deformation (AID) can auto-generate nodal contours. Our study investigated the optimal use of such contours in cervical online cone-beam-based ART.

Materials and Methods

From 136 adaptive fractions across 21 cervical cancer patients with nodal disease, we extracted 649 clinically-delivered and AID clinical target volume (CTV) lymph node boost structures. We assessed geometric alignment between AID and clinical CTVs via dice similarity coefficient, and 95% Hausdorff distance, and geometric coverage of clinical CTVs by AID planning target volumes by false positive dice. Coverage of clinical CTVs by AID contour-based plans was evaluated using D100, D95, V100%, and V95%.

Results

Between AID and clinical CTVs, the median dice similarity coefficient was 0.66 and the median 95 % Hausdorff distance was 4.0 mm. The median false positive dice of clinical CTV coverage by AID planning target volumes was 0. The median D100 was 1.00, the median D95 was 1.01, the median V100% was 1.00, and the median V95% was 1.00. Increased nodal volume, fraction number, and daily adaptation were associated with reduced clinical CTV coverage by AID-based plans.

Conclusion

In one of the first reports on pelvic nodal ART, AID-based plans could adequately cover nodal targets. However, physician review is required due to performance variation. Greater attention is needed for larger, daily-adapted nodes further into treatment.

Predicting cervical cancer target motion using a multivariate regression model to enable patient selection for adaptive external beam radiotherapy

Background and purpose

Interfraction motion during cervical cancer radiotherapy is substantial in some patients, minimal in others. Non-adaptive plans may miss the target and/or unnecessarily irradiate normal tissue. Adaptive radiotherapy leads to superior dose-volume metrics but is resource-intensive. The aim of this study was to predict target motion, enabling patient selection and efficient resource allocation.

Materials and methods

Forty cervical cancer patients had CT with full-bladder (CT-FB) and empty-bladder (CT-EB) at planning, and daily cone-beam CTs (CBCTs). The low-risk clinical target volume (CTVLR) was contoured. Mean coverage of the daily CTVLR by the CT-FB CTVLR was calculated for each patient. Eighty-three investigated variables included measures of organ geometry, patient, tumour and treatment characteristics. Models were trained on 29 patients (171 fractions). The Two-CT multivariate model could use all available data. The Single-CT multivariate model excluded data from the CT-EB. A univariate model was trained using the distance moved by the uterine fundus tip between CTs, the only method of patient selection found in published cervix plan-of-the-day studies. Models were tested on 11 patients (68 fractions). Accuracy in predicting mean coverage was reported as mean absolute error (MAE), mean squared error (MSE) and R2.

Results

The Two-CT model was based upon rectal volume, dice similarity coefficient between CT-FB and CT-EB CTVLR, and uterine thickness. The Single-CT model was based upon rectal volume, uterine thickness and tumour size. Both performed better than the univariate model in predicting mean coverage (MAE 7 %, 7 % and 8 %; MSE 82 %2, 65 %2, 110 %2; R2 0.2, 0.4, -0.1).

Conclusion

Uterocervix motion is complex and multifactorial. We present two multivariate models which predicted motion with reasonable accuracy using pre-treatment information, and outperformed the only published method.

Empirical analysis of a plan-of-the-day strategy to approximate daily online reoptimization for prostate CBCT-guided adaptive radiotherapy

PURPOSE

Adaptive radiotherapy (ART) can improve the dose delivered to the patient in the presence of anatomic variations. However, the required time, effort, and clinical resources are intensive. This work analyzed a plan-of-the-day (POD) approach on clinical patients treated with online ART to explore implementations that balance dosimetric benefit and clinical resource cost.

METHODS

Eight patients treated to the prostate and proximal seminal vesicles with 26 fractions of CBCT-guided, daily online ART were retrospectively analyzed. With a plan library composed of daily adaptive plans from the initial week of treatment and the original plan, the effect of a POD approach starting the following week was investigated by simulating use of these previously generated plans under 3- and 6-degree-of-freedom patient alignment. The plan selected for each treatment was that from the library that maximized the Dice similarity coefficient of the clinical target volume with that of the current treatment fraction. The resulting distribution of several target coverage and organ-at-risk dose metrics are described relative to those achieved with the daily online reoptimized adaptive technique.

RESULTS

The values of target coverage and organ-at-risk dose metrics varied across patients and metrics. The POD schemas closely approximated the reference values from a fully reoptimized adaptive plan yet required less than 20% of the reoptimization effort. The POD schemas also had a much greater effect on target coverage metrics than 6-degree-of-freedom registration did. Organ-at-risk dose metrics also varied considerably across patients but did not exhibit a consistent dependence on the particular schema.

CONCLUSIONS

POD schemas were able to achieve the vast majority of the dosimetric benefit of daily online ART with a small fraction of the online reoptimization effort. Strategies like this might allow for more practical and strategic implementation of ART so as to benefit a greater number of patients.

Impact of reduced margin pelvic radiotherapy on gastrointestinal toxicity and outcome in gynecological cancer

Purpose

To investigate the effect of reduced margin pelvic radiotherapy on gastrointestinal toxicity and outcomes in gynecological cancer.

Materials and methods

This retrospective study analyzed data of 590 patients who underwent hysterectomy and adjuvant pelvic radiotherapy between 2010 and 2020 at two tertiary centers. The pelvic nodal region was delineated based on a reduced margin definition or the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) guidelines. All patients were treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy with imaging guidance. Gastrointestinal toxicity was assessed using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) and the Patient-Reported Outcome version (PRO-CTCAE).

Results

Overall, 352 (59.7%) and 238 (40.3%) patients underwent RTOG and reduced margin pelvic radiotherapy, respectively. Median follow-up was 6.4 years (IQR: 3.7-9.6). Reduced margin pelvic radiotherapy significantly lowered the radiation dose to the small bowel. For CTCAE grade ≥ 2 or 3, acute gastrointestinal toxicity was lower in the reduced margin group than in the RTOG group (16.4% vs. 33.5%, p < 0.001; 2.9% vs. 8.5%, p < 0.001). The reduced margin group reported less severe acute gastrointestinal toxicity (PRO-CTCAE score ≥ 3) than the RTOG group (12.5% vs. 28.7%, p < 0.001). Late grade 3 gastrointestinal toxicity was lower in the reduced margin group than in the RTOG group (0.8% vs. 4.8%, p = 0.006). The 5-year pelvic recurrence-free survival and disease-free survival in the RTOG and reduced margin pelvic radiotherapy groups were 97.4% and 97.9% (p = 0.55) and 80.7% and 83.5% (p = 0.18), respectively.

Conclusion

Reduced margin pelvic radiotherapy decreased acute and late gastrointestinal toxicity and achieved favorable outcomes.