New research findings on zoledronic acid: survival, pain, and anti-tumour effects

Bone health and therapeutic agents in advanced prostate cancer

Prostate cancer is the most frequent genitourinary tumor worldwide. Maintaining an optimum bone health throughout the natural course of prostate cancer is an important aspect in the management of this disease, particularly in this at risk population of older and frail patients who experience bone loss related to androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) and/or patients who develop bone metastases. The number of treatment options for advanced prostate cancer that combine ADT with docetaxel, new hormonal agents and/or radiotherapy has increased substantially in recent years. Bisphosphonates and other bone targeted agents such as denosumab have shown an improvement in bone mineral density and are suited for patients with treatment-related osteoporosis and/or bone metastases with an increased risk of skeletal-related events (SREs). In this context, the aim of this review is to analyse key aspects of bone health and therapies that can prevent the occurrence of SREs throughout the clinical course of prostate cancer, and how to combine them with new available treatments in this setting.

Therapy-Induced Senescence Drives Bone Loss

Chemotherapy is important for cancer treatment, however, toxicities limit its use. While great strides have been made to ameliorate the acute toxicities induced by chemotherapy, long-term comorbidities including bone loss remain a significant problem. Chemotherapy-driven estrogen loss is postulated to drive bone loss, but significant data suggests the existence of an estrogen-independent mechanism of bone loss. Using clinically relevant mouse models, we showed that senescence and its senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) contribute to chemotherapy-induced bone loss that can be rescued by depleting senescent cells. Chemotherapy-induced SASP could be limited by targeting the p38MAPK-MK2 pathway, which resulted in preservation of bone integrity in chemotherapy-treated mice. These results transform our understanding of chemotherapy-induced bone loss by identifying senescent cells as major drivers of bone loss and the p38MAPK-MK2 axis as a putative therapeutic target that can preserve bone and improve a cancer survivor's quality of life. SIGNIFICANCE: Senescence drives chemotherapy-induced bone loss that is rescued by p38MAPK or MK2 inhibitors. These findings may lead to treatments for therapy-induced bone loss, significantly increasing quality of life for cancer survivors.

Bone-targeted therapies for elderly patients with renal cell carcinoma: current and future directions

Bone metastases are very common in advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and can have a huge impact on quality of life by leading to skeletal-related events (SREs), including pain, pathologic fractures and spinal cord compression with need for surgery or radiotherapy. Because of their osteolytic aspect and biologic behaviour, these SREs are more common in patients with bone metastases from RCC than from other malignancies. As overall survival is increased by new anti-angiogenic drugs like tyrosine kinase inhibitors and mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors, the incidence of SREs is rising, making the clinical management of bone metastases in RCC ever more important, especially in the more vulnerable elderly patient. In this review we discuss the current advances and future directions in bone-targeted therapies in patients with RCC with a special focus on the elderly population. Recently, two bone-targeted agents have been approved in the prevention of SREs in advanced RCC: zoledronic acid and denosumab. To date, there is no specific data on the use of bisphosphonates or denosumab in the elderly and specific studies in this setting are warranted. We compare the available evidence for the use and implications of both agents in the elderly patient and give general information on safety concerns that could be more important in these patients.

Erdheim-Chester disease and pituitary involvement: a unique case and the literature

An early thirties man diagnosed with Erdheim-Chester disease (ECD) was simultaneously disclosed to have hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, central adrenal insufficiency, and GH deficiency in addition to central diabetes insipidus (CDI). Pituitary magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed swelling in the stalk, enlargement of the anterior lobe with delayed enhancement, and loss of high intensity of the posterior lobe on T1-weighted images, suggesting of pituitary involvement of ECD. Three months after starting treatment with interferon α and zoledronic acid, polyuria and polydipsia were ameliorated without DDAVP, accompanied with improvement of MRI. Simultaneously technetium-99m bone scintigraphy showed improvement, accompanied with a relief of bone pain and high fever. In contrast, he developed secondary hypothyroidism with slight enlargement of anterior pituitary gland without relapse of CDI, suggesting of different responses to treatment with interferon α between anterior pituitary lobe and posterior one. So far he continues to be replaced with deficient hormone replacement therapy. As for bone pain, it remains to be controlled with the decreased levels of bone resorption marker with decreased abnormal uptake in bone scintigraphy although zoledronic acid was discontinued for osteonecrosis of the jaw. For four years, he has not showed new involvement at other organs besides bones and the pituitary. While CDI is known to be very common in ECD, improvement of CDI has been reported in a few cases. Other endocrine manifestations, especially with detailed endocrine status, have been also reported in limited cases. Thus we report this case and review the literature.

Protection of bone in premenopausal women with breast cancer: focus on zoledronic acid

Maintaining bone health is important for patients with breast cancer (BC), the most commonly diagnosed cancer in American women. Indeed, bone loss is common throughout the BC disease continuum. In the metastatic BC setting, patients are likely to develop bone metastases, a painful complication that can lead to potentially debilitating skeletal-related events. Bone health is equally important for patients with early BC. During adjuvant therapy for early BC, the largest challenge to bone health is from accelerated bone mineral density (BMD) loss. Although decreased BMD is well recognized in older, postmenopausal women, it may be underestimated in younger, premenopausal women undergoing endocrine therapy for BC. The rate and extent of cancer therapy-induced bone loss (from chemotherapy or endocrine therapy) are substantially greater than normal decreases in BMD during menopause. Bisphosphonates such as zoledronic acid (ZOL) are antiresorptive agents indicated for the treatment of bone metastases from BC. Clinical trials over the past few years suggest that, although not yet approved for this indication, ZOL can prevent cancer therapy-induced bone loss and improve BMD in premenopausal women receiving adjuvant (endocrine or chemo-) therapy for BC. Furthermore, the benefits of ZOL therapy may go beyond maintaining bone health and include potential anticancer benefits together with favorable tolerability and cost/benefit profiles. This review will focus specifically on the role of ZOL in preserving the bone health of premenopausal women with BC.

Current approaches to bone-targeted therapy in genitourinary malignancies

Bone metastases in patients with genitourinary cancers are associated with increased risk for skeletal-related events including pathologic fractures, spinal cord compression, and the requirement for surgery or palliative radiotherapy to bone. The nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate zoledronic acid and the monoclonal antibody against RANK, denosumab, are approved for the prevention of skeletal-related events in genitourinary cancers. These agents have different mechanisms of action and pharmacokinetic profiles, and while both are effective in reducing the risk of skeletal-related events, other clinical effects differ. There is evidence for direct and indirect anticancer activity with zoledronic acid from preclinical studies and emerging data from clinical studies suggesting an effect on patient survival. Potential anticancer mechanisms include inhibition of angiogenesis, enhanced immune surveillance via stimulation of γδ T cells, and reduction of circulating tumor cells. A synergistic effect of chemotherapy plus zoledronic acid has also been suggested. Further research is ongoing regarding the roles of these antiresorptive therapies in patients with bone metastases or at high risk for malignant spread to skeletal sites.

The management of pain in metastatic bone disease

BACKGROUND

Metastatic bone disease is a common cause of pain in cancer patients. A multidisciplinary approach to treatment is often necessary because simplified analgesic regimens may fail in the face of complex pain generators, especially those involved in the genesis of neuropathic pain. From the origins of formalized guidelines by the World Health Organization (WHO) to recent developments in implantable therapies, great strides have been made to meet the needs of these patients.

METHODS

The authors review the existing literature on the pathophysiology and treatment options for pain generated by metastatic bone disease and summarize classic and new approaches.

RESULTS

Relatively recent animal models of malignant bone disease have allowed a better understanding of the intimate mechanisms involved in the genesis of pain, resulting in a mechanistic approach to its treatment. Analgesic strategies can be developed with specific targets in mind to complement the classic, opioid-centered WHO analgesic ladder obtaining improved outcomes and quality of life. Unfortunately, high-quality evidence is difficult to produce in pain medicine, and these concepts are evolving slowly.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment options are expanding for the challenging clinical problem of painful metastatic bone disease. Efforts are concentrated on developing alternative nonopioid approaches that appear to increase the success rate and improve patients' quality of life.

Osteonecrosis of the jaw onset times are based on the route of bisphosphonate therapy

PURPOSE

Osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) has been reported to be associated with patients receiving bisphosphonate (BP) therapy. There are many reports that suggest that the time of exposure to BPs is a significant risk factor for ONJ and that the greatest risk occurs after dentoalveolar surgery. The aim of this study was to retrospectively investigate the duration of BP therapy and related events before the onset of ONJ based on an intravenous (IV) or oral route of administration.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients referred to our institution to identify the onset of ONJ based on the exposure to BP therapy and associated triggers (ie, dentoalveolar surgery or spontaneous occurrence) based on the route of BP administration. Demographic data (ie, age, gender, and race), medical diagnosis related to BP therapy, and information as to whether the BP therapy was continued at the time of ONJ diagnosis were also collected.

RESULTS

We reviewed the records for 114 patients with a history of ONJ. We divided patient cohorts by route of BP administration, with 76 patients having a history of IV BP therapy and 38 patients having a history of oral BP therapy. The overall onset of ONJ was earlier in the IV BP group (median, 3 years) compared with the oral BP group (median, 5 years). There was no statistical difference in the duration to occurrence of ONJ associated with dental extraction compared with spontaneous occurrence for both the IV and oral BP groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The median onset of ONJ for patients undergoing IV BP therapy occurs earlier than the median onset for patients undergoing oral BP therapy, and there was no difference in onset occurring spontaneously and after dental extraction. The significance of these findings suggests that patients who receive IV BP therapy should be closely evaluated after the initiation of BP therapy. The lack of evidence suggesting greater onset after dental extraction may provide clinical support for dentoalveolar surgery that is indicated for patients with a history of BP therapy. Research focusing on the clinical circumstances and physiologic events during early antiresorptive therapy may provide insight as to the critical risk factors.

Importance of antiresorptive therapies for patients with bone metastases from solid tumors

Patients with bone metastases are at risk of skeletal-related events such as pathologic fractures, spinal cord compression, the need for orthopedic surgery to bone, and palliative radiotherapy for severe bone pain. Antiresorptive therapies have demonstrated efficacy for reducing the risk of skeletal-related events and ameliorating bone pain. Despite the well documented clinical benefits of antiresorptive therapies, patient benefits can be limited or compromised by nonadherence with scheduled therapy. Potential reasons for poor compliance include lack of understanding of how antiresorptive therapies work, neglecting the importance of bone health in maintaining quality of life, and being unaware of the potentially debilitating effects of skeletal-related events caused by bone metastases. Indeed, patients may stop therapy after bone pain subsides or discontinue due to generally mild and usually manageable adverse events, leaving them at an increased risk of developing skeletal-related events. In addition, the cost of antiresorptive therapy can be a concern for many patients with cancer. Medical care for patients with cancer requires a coordinated effort between primary care physicians and oncologists. Patients’ medical care teams can be leveraged to help educate them about the importance of adherence to antiresorptive therapy when cancer has metastasized to bone. Because primary care physicians generally have more contact with their patients than oncologists, they are in a unique position to understand patient perceptions and habits that may lead to noncompliance and to help educate patients about the benefits and risks of various antiresorptive therapies in the advanced cancer setting. Therefore, primary care physicians need to be aware of various mechanistic and clinical considerations regarding antiresorptive treatment options.

Bone-modifying agents in the treatment of bone metastases in patients with advanced genitourinary malignancies: a focus on zoledronic acid

Many patients with advanced genitourinary malignancies develop bone metastases, which can lead to potentially debilitating skeletal complications. Moreover, age-related bone loss and cancer treatments such as hormonal therapy for prostate cancer can weaken bone, placing patients at risk for osteoporotic fractures in addition to skeletal-related events (SREs) from bone metastases. Zoledronic acid, a bisphosphonate, is approved worldwide to reduce the risk of SREs in patients with bone metastases from solid tumors or bone lesions from multiple myeloma. Zoledronic acid, although underutilized in genitourinary malignancies, has long been the mainstay of treatment in patients with bone metastases, and can also help preserve bone during anticancer therapy. Recently, denosumab, a monoclonal antibody directed against the receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand, was approved in the United States and the European Union for reducing the risk of SREs in patients with bone metastases from solid tumors. Denosumab (at a lower dose) is also approved in the European Union and the United States to treat androgen deprivation-induced bone loss in men with prostate cancer. In addition, preclinical rationale and emerging clinical data suggest that bone-modifying agents may be able to delay disease progression in genitourinary cancers, just as newly developed anticancer treatments have produced reductions in SREs, possibly by indirect effects on the disease course. This review article summarizes current data and ongoing studies to preserve bone health in patients with advanced genitourinary cancers.

Bisphosphonates: prevention of bone metastases in prostate cancer

Bone metastases and their associated morbidities are common in patients with advanced prostate cancer and other genitourinary (GU) malignancies. Zoledronic acid> (a bisphosphonate) has long been the mainstay of treatment for reducing the risk of skeletal-related events in patients with bone metastases from GU cancers, and denosumab (a monoclonal antibody directed against the receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B ligand [RANKL]) has recently received approval for this indication in the United States. Preclinical data indicate that modifying the bone microenvironment may render it less conducive to metastasis, and emerging clinical findings suggest that the potential benefits from bone-directed therapies are not limited to reducing skeletal morbidity-these agents might help to improve survival and delay bone disease progression or even development of bone metastases (if used earlier in the disease course). This chapter reviews the rationale and recent clinical data supporting an antimetastatic role for bone-directed therapies in patients with GU malignancies.

Osteolytic and osteoblastic bone metastases: two extremes of the same spectrum?

Normal bone development and maintenance are sustained through a balanced communication between osteoclasts and osteoblasts. Invasion of the bone compartment by cancer cells causes an imbalance in their activities and results in predominantly bone lysing or bone forming phenotypes depending on the origin of the cancer. Tumor-induced bone lesions usually exhibit disturbances of both cell types. Thus, osteoclast activity is activated in a predominantly osteoblastic lesion and vice versa. These cancer-induced bone responses favor the survival and growth of cancer cells in their new environment. Therapies that can restore the balance may limit the growth of cancer cells in the bone. The recent development of agents that target the osteolytic components of bone metastasis, including bisphosphonates and denosumab, showed promising results in osteolytic bone diseases such as multiple myeloma but were less effective in improving the osteoblastic bone disease found in prostate cancer. Thus, while osteolytic components are present in both osteoblastic and osteolytic bone lesions, inhibition of the osteolytic component is not sufficient to alter the vicious cycle leading to tumors with an osteoblastic phenotype. These observations suggest that osteolytic and osteoblastic bone metastases are not the same and tumor-induced osteoblastic and osteolytic activity play different roles in supporting their growth and survival.

Perspectives in the elderly patient: benefits and limits of bisphosphonates and denosumab

Skeletal metastases affect a large percentage of the cancer population and contribute to a marked decrease in their quality of life and survival, in particular in elderly population. A future end-point of bone-protecting therapy is the demonstration of its ability to prevent or improve results in the treatment of metastatic disease, enlarging their clinical indications in metastatic and osteoporotic setting with different schedules. In this chapter we will discuss on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions of bisphosphonates in elderly, and the preclinical and clinical evidences of anticancer activity of bone-targeted therapies will be critically described. The clinical results of new targeted therapies (such as rank/rankl/OPG inhibition) will be reported both in bone metastatic and in adjuvant settings. Finally, the prevention of cancer treatment-induced bone loss (CTIBL) represents both in young and more in old patients an emerging issue in the bone health care. For this reason, this chapter will discuss the results of current therapies in this clinical setting.

Three cases of bone metastases in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are rare, but represent the most common mesenchymal neoplasms of the gastrointestinal tract. Tumor resection is the treatment of choice for localized disease. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (imatinib, sunitinib) are the standard therapy for metastatic or unresectable GISTs. GISTs usually metastasize to the liver and peritoneum. Bone metastases are uncommon. We describe three cases of bone metastases in patients with advanced GISTs: two women (82 and 54 years of age), and one man (62 years of age). Bones metastases involved the spine, pelvis and ribs in one patient, multiple vertebral bodies and pelvis in one, and the spine and iliac wings in the third case. The lesions presented a lytic pattern in all cases. Two patients presented with multiple bone metastases at the time of initial diagnosis and one patient after seven years during the follow-up period. This report describes the diagnosis and treatment of the lesions and may help clinicians to manage bones metastases in GIST patients.

The role of antiresorptive therapies in improving patient care in early and metastatic breast cancer

Breast cancer is the second most common cancer among American women and has a high rate of metastasis to bone. Patients regularly undergo adjuvant therapy (chemotherapy or hormonal therapy) following surgical resection of the tumor. In addition to potential direct effects on bone cells, both chemotherapy and hormonal therapy induce ovarian dysfunction and dramatically decrease estrogen levels in both pre- and postmenopausal women. This leads to decreased bone mineral density and increased fracture risk. Antiresorptive therapies (e.g, zoledronic acid and denosumab) have demonstrated efficacy in preventing cancer therapy-induced bone loss in patients with breast cancer and are approved for the prevention of skeletal-related events in patients with bone metastases from breast cancer. This review will focus on the evolving role of these antiresorptive therapies in the care of women with early or metastatic breast cancer.

Direct and indirect anticancer activity of bisphosphonates: a brief review of published literature

The bone marrow microenvironment provides a site for cancer cells to evade systemic anticancer therapy. Dormant tumor micrometastases are believed to be the source of disease persistence and relapse; however, the exact characteristics of cancer stem cells vs. cancer cells with limited metastatic potential have yet to be elucidated. Bisphosphonates inhibit osteoclast-mediated bone resorption, are approved for treating malignant bone disease from advanced cancers, and have shown efficacy for preventing cancer treatment-induced bone loss. Altering the bone marrow microenvironment to make it less conducive to cancer cell survival is now emerging as an important means to prevent cancer recurrence. This review aims to distill the diverse literature and provide a brief overview of the numerous preclinical and early clinical studies of bisphosphonates demonstrating a variety of direct and indirect anticancer activities that affect both the tumor cell (the "seed") and surrounding microenvironment (the "soil"). Recently, zoledronic acid was found to improve disease-free survival and overall survival in some adjuvant breast cancer settings and prolonged survival in patients with multiple myeloma and other advanced cancers. In the prostate cancer setting, antiresorptive therapy was reported to delay the development of overt bone metastases. Ongoing studies will provide further insight regarding the anticancer potential of bisphosphonates and other antiresorptive agents.

Zoledronic acid combined with chemotherapy bring survival benefits to patients with bone metastases from nasopharyngeal carcinoma

PURPOSE

Bone is the most common site of metastases from nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Zoledronic acid (ZA) used to prevent skeletal-related events (SREs) of bone metastases has shown anti-tumor effects; yet, no report has been found on the survival benefit of ZA in NPC. This study aimed to evaluate whether ZA can bring survival benefits to patients with bone metastases from NPC.

METHODS

A total of 307 patients with of NPC who had bone metastases were analyzed retrospectively. The differences of survival between patients treated with chemotherapy combined with ZA and those with chemotherapy alone were evaluated by the log-rank test. The Cox multivariate analyses of clinical features and different treatment methods of the 307 patients were conducted.

RESULTS

The prevalence of SREs in the combined approach group was lower than that with chemotherapy alone (34% vs. 48%, X (2) = 7.003, P = 0.008). The combined approach group had better progression-free survival (PFS) (11.5 vs. 5.5 months, P < 0.001) and overall survival (OS) (23.5 vs. 17.5 months, P < 0.001) than chemotherapy alone group. Cox multivariate analysis identified the following independent prognostic factors: ZA treatment, bone metastatic sites, baseline serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP) level, SREs and cycles of chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

ZA treatment combined with chemotherapy could reduce SREs and improve PFS and OS for NPC patients with bone metastases.

Skeletal metastasis in renal cell carcinoma: current and future management options

Metastasis to the skeleton is common in advanced renal cancer and leads to debilitating skeletal complications including severe pain, increased fracture rate and spinal cord compression. The incidence of renal cell carcinoma is increasing by around 2% per year and recent advances in targeted anti-angiogenic therapy for advanced disease are expected to lead to longer survival times. The clinical management of metastatic bone disease in renal cell carcinoma therefore merits greater focus than hitherto. Bone metastases arising from renal cancer are highly osteolytic and particularly destructive. Fortunately, the continuing development of anti-resorptive drugs is revolutionising the medical management of metastatic bone disease across many tumour types and making a major impact on quality of life. The bisphosphonate zoledronic acid is now licensed for use in advanced renal cell carcinoma and appears to yield a greater benefit in terms of reduction in skeletal related events than in bone metastases arising from other tumour types. Drugs which are directed at specific targets in the bone metastasis pathway are in development, including denosumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody against receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B ligand, which has recently been licensed in the United States for use in renal cell carcinoma, with European licensing expected soon. This review examines the increasing options for treatment of metastatic bone disease in renal cell carcinoma, with a focus on drug-based advances and progress in the development of existing and new biomarkers to support clinical management.

Bone-marker levels in patients with prostate cancer: potential correlations with outcomes

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The skeleton is typically the first site of metastasis in patients with prostate cancer, and bone metastases can result in severe bone pain and potentially debilitating fractures. Although bone scans are a reliable means of assessing osteoblastic lesions, tools for monitoring early changes in bone health are lacking. Biochemical markers of bone turnover might fulfill this unmet need.

RECENT FINDINGS

Correlative studies have suggested that bone-marker levels may have utility in assessing disease progression and response to bone-directed therapy. Elevated levels of the markers, N-telopeptide of type I collagen and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, are associated with higher rates of death and skeletal-related events in the bone metastasis setting. Marker levels also correlate with response to zoledronic acid treatment, and similar data with the investigational agent, denosumab, are emerging.

SUMMARY

Changes in bone-marker levels reflect alterations in skeletal homeostasis and can provide important insights into bone disease progression and response to bone-directed therapy in patients with prostate cancer. More mature data from currently ongoing clinical trials will provide further insight on the utility of marker assessments as an adjunct to established monitoring methods in prostate cancer.

Management of castration-resistant prostate cancer: bisphosphonates and emerging therapies

Approximately 70% of patients with prostate cancer will develop bone metastases that often lead to bone pain and skeletal-related events. Several bisphosphonates have shown promising activity for palliating pain. Only zoledronic acid has significantly delayed the onset and reduced the incidence of skeletal-related events in men with castration-resistant prostate cancer. In addition, studies suggest that bisphosphonates have anticancer activity that may prevent disease progression and improve survival. Clodronate was shown to improve survival in a study of men with metastatic androgen-sensitive prostate cancer. Emerging therapies are being investigated for their ability to maintain bone health. The findings presented herein highlight the importance of bone-targeted therapies for patients with bone metastases from prostate cancer.

Denosumab versus zoledronic acid for treatment of bone metastases in men with castration-resistant prostate cancer: a randomised, double-blind study

BACKGROUND

Bone metastases are a major burden in men with advanced prostate cancer. We compared denosumab, a human monoclonal antibody against RANKL, with zoledronic acid for prevention of skeletal-related events in men with bone metastases from castration-resistant prostate cancer.

METHODS

In this phase 3 study, men with castration-resistant prostate cancer and no previous exposure to intravenous bisphosphonate were enrolled from 342 centres in 39 countries. An interactive voice response system was used to assign patients (1:1 ratio), according to a computer-generated randomisation sequence, to receive 120 mg subcutaneous denosumab plus intravenous placebo, or 4 mg intravenous zoledronic acid plus subcutaneous placebo, every 4 weeks until the primary analysis cutoff date. Randomisation was stratified by previous skeletal-related event, prostate-specific antigen concentration, and chemotherapy for prostate cancer within 6 weeks before randomisation. Supplemental calcium and vitamin D were strongly recommended. Patients, study staff, and investigators were masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was time to first on-study skeletal-related event (pathological fracture, radiation therapy, surgery to bone, or spinal cord compression), and was assessed for non-inferiority. The same outcome was further assessed for superiority as a secondary endpoint. Efficacy analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00321620, and has been completed.

FINDINGS

1904 patients were randomised, of whom 950 assigned to denosumab and 951 assigned to receive zoledronic acid were eligible for the efficacy analysis. Median duration on study at primary analysis cutoff date was 12·2 months (IQR 5·9-18·5) for patients on denosumab and 11·2 months (IQR 5·6-17·4) for those on zoledronic acid. Median time to first on-study skeletal-related event was 20·7 months (95% CI 18·8-24·9) with denosumab compared with 17·1 months (15·0-19·4) with zoledronic acid (hazard ratio 0·82, 95% CI 0·71-0·95; p = 0·0002 for non-inferiority; p = 0·008 for superiority). Adverse events were recorded in 916 patients (97%) on denosumab and 918 patients (97%) on zoledronic acid, and serious adverse events were recorded in 594 patients (63%) on denosumab and 568 patients (60%) on zoledronic acid. More events of hypocalcaemia occurred in the denosumab group (121 [13%]) than in the zoledronic acid group (55 [6%]; p<0·0001). Osteonecrosis of the jaw occurred infrequently (22 [2%] vs 12 [1%]; p = 0·09).

INTERPRETATION

Denosumab was better than zoledronic acid for prevention of skeletal-related events, and potentially represents a novel treatment option in men with bone metastases from castration-resistant prostate cancer.

FUNDING

Amgen.

Zoledronic acid use in cancer patients: more than just supportive care?

Bone is the most common site for metastasis from solid tumors, and the majority of patients will develop bone metastases during the natural course of their disease. Bisphosphonates are an effective treatment for preventing skeletal-related events in patients with bone metastases and may preserve functional independence and quality of life. Although several bisphosphonates have been investigated in patients with solid tumors, only zoledronic acid (ZOL) is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency for preventing skeletal-related events in patients across a broad range of solid tumors. In addition, bisphosphonates, notably ZOL, prevent cancer treatment-induced bone loss in breast and prostate cancer patients who are receiving endocrine therapy. It also has been demonstrated that ZOL directly and indirectly inhibits cancer cell growth in vitro and growth and tumorigenesis in animal model systems. These properties may produce clinically meaningful benefits. In recent clinical studies in patients with cancer, ZOL improved overall and prolonged disease-free survival. Ongoing clinical trials in patients with solid tumors will provide further insight into the potential of ZOL to prevent distant metastases and improve survival.

Improving progression-free and overall survival in patients with cancer: a potential role for bisphosphonates

INTRODUCTION

Bisphosphonates are a well-established therapy for patients with multiple myeloma or bone metastases from advanced cancers and are used routinely to delay the onset and reduce the risk of skeletal-related events. Emerging evidence indicates that they also may provide additional anticancer benefits. These developments warrant reappraisal of their role in patients with cancer and reevaluation of optimal therapeutic regimens.

AREAS COVERED

This article reviews the evidence of the anticancer activity of bisphosphonates in patients with solid tumors or multiple myeloma. The underlying mechanisms of the anticancer activity of bisphosphonates are elucidated from preclinical and translational data that show that bisphosphonates suppress tumor growth and survival, inhibit tumor-mediated angiogenesis, or stimulate host anticancer immune response. These data also provide insights into the potential for therapeutic combinations. Preclinical and clinical data relating to the anticancer effects of bisphosphonates are reviewed by cancer type.

EXPERT OPINION

Future trials of bisphosphonates in cancer patients will explore the underlying mechanism of the anticancer benefit in greater detail and attempt to examine critically the potential clinical benefit in individual cancer types in early/advanced disease.

Burden of metastatic bone disease from genitourinary malignancies

Bone metastases are common among patients with stage IV genitourinary cancers. Most patients with bone metastases develop at least one debilitating and potentially life-limiting skeletal-related event. These events are associated with increased medical expenses and decreased quality of life. Current guidelines recommend screening for bone metastases in men with high-risk prostate cancer, but guidance for screening and treatment of bone metastases from genitourinary cancers varies by country and setting. Several bisphosphonates have been evaluated in the advanced genitourinary cancer setting. Zoledronic acid has demonstrated efficacy in significantly reducing the risk of skeletal-related events in patients with bone metastases from a broad range of solid tumors including prostate, renal and bladder cancers, and is recommended for preserving bone health.

Regulation of androgen receptor transactivity and mTOR-S6 kinase pathway by Rheb in prostate cancer cell proliferation

BACKGROUND

Ras homolog-enriched in brain (Rheb), a small GTP-binding protein, is associated with prostate carcinogenesis through activating mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling pathway. This study aimed to elucidate whether Rheb promotes proliferation of prostate cancer cells and can act as a potent therapeutic target in prostate cancer.

METHODS

Prostate cancer cell lines and human prostatic tissues were examined for the expression of Rheb. The effects of forced expression or knockdown of Rheb on cell proliferation were also examined. Semi-quantitative and quantitative RT-PCR were performed to evaluate mRNA expression. Western blotting was used to examine protein expression. Cell count and WST-1 assay were used to measure cell proliferation. Fluorescence-activated cell sorting was used to assess the cell cycle.

RESULTS

Rheb mRNA and protein expression was higher in more aggressive, androgen-independent prostate cancer cell lines PC3, DU145, and C4-2, compared with the less aggressive LNCaP. Rheb expression was higher in cancer tissues than in benign prostatic epithelia. Forced expression of Rheb in LNCaP cells accelerated proliferation without enhancing androgen receptor transactivity. Attenuation of Rheb expression or treatment with the mTOR inhibitor rapamycin decreased proliferation of PC3 and DU145 cells, with a decrease in the activated form of p70S6 kinase, one of the main targets of mTOR.

CONCLUSIONS

Rheb potentiates proliferation of prostate cancer cells and inhibition of Rheb or mTOR can lead to suppressed proliferation of aggressive prostate cancer cell lines in vitro. Rheb and the mTOR pathway are therefore probable targets for suppressing prostate cancer.

Efficacy of zoledronic acid in postmenopausal women with early breast cancer receiving adjuvant letrozole: 36-month results of the ZO-FAST Study

BACKGROUND

Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are accepted as adjuvant therapy for postmenopausal women (PMW) with hormone-responsive early breast cancer (EBC) with superior efficacy to tamoxifen. However, increased bone loss is associated with AIs.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

PMW with EBC receiving letrozole (2.5 mg/day for 5 years) were randomly assigned to immediate zoledronic acid (ZOL; 4 mg every 6 months) or delayed ZOL (initiated only for fracture or high risk thereof).

RESULTS

Patients (N = 1065) had a median age of 58 years; 54% had received prior adjuvant chemotherapy. At 36 months, mean change in L2-L4 bone mineral density (BMD) was +4.39% for immediate versus -4.9% for delayed ZOL (P < 0.0001). Between-group differences were 5.27% at 12 months, 7.94% at 24 months, and 9.29% at 36 months (P < 0.0001 for all). At 36 months, the immediate-ZOL group had a significant 41% relative risk reduction for disease-free survival (DFS) events (P = 0.0314). Adverse events are consistent with the known safety profiles of the study drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

At 36 months, immediate ZOL was more effective in preserving BMD during letrozole therapy. Immediate versus delayed ZOL led to significantly improved DFS. Benefits are observed in the context of a favorable, well-established safety profile for letrozole and ZOL.

A single pretreatment by zoledronic acid converts metastases from osteolytic to osteoblastic in the rat

Bone metastases are severe complications of cancers associated with increased morbidity, pain, risk fracture, and reduced life span for patients. Bisphosphonates emerged as a relief treatment in bone metastases. A single dose of zoledronic acid (78 microg/kg) was injected into six Copenhagen rats 4 days before receiving an intraosseous inoculation of metastatic anaplastic tumor of lymph node and lung cell (MLL) prostate cancer cells. Rat femurs were analyzed for changes by microCT and histomorphometry; trabecular volume, trabecular characteristics, osteoid parameters, osteoblastic surfaces, and osteoclast number were measured. Values were compared to a group of SHAM animals, a group of SHAM animals having received zoledronic acid and animals inoculated with MLL cells. All rats were euthanized after 1 month. MLL cells induced osteolysis in the metaphysis with extension of the tumor to soft tissues through cortical perforations. Zoledronic acid induced a marked osteosclerosis in the primary spongiosa in both SHAM and rats inoculated with MLL. Osteosclerosis was obtained in the secondary spongiosa of MLL rats. The bisphosphonate preserved cortical integrity in all animals, and no extension to soft tissues was observed in most animals. The number of osteoclasts was elevated, indicating that there was no apoptosis of osteoclasts but they became inactive. Osteosclerosis was associated with increased osteoblastic surfaces. A single zoledronic acid injection turned osteolytic metastases into osteosclerotic and preserved cortical integrity.

Adjuvant therapy with oral sodium clodronate in locally advanced and metastatic prostate cancer: long-term overall survival results from the MRC PR04 and PR05 randomised controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Bisphosphonates might modulate the development of symptomatic bone metastases in men with prostate cancer. The Medical Research Council (MRC) PR05 and PR04 randomised controlled trials assessed the use of sodium clodronate, an oral, first-generation bisphosphonate. We report the final analyses of long-term survival data with additional follow-up in both trials.

METHODS

311 men with metastatic disease were recruited to PR05 between 1994 and 1998, and 508 men with non-metastatic disease were recruited to PR04 from 1994 to 1997. All men were treated according to the recruiting site's standard practice at the time: for metastatic disease, all men were starting or responding to long-term hormone therapy; for non-metastatic disease, most men had radiotherapy, hormone therapy, or both. Men were randomly assigned to take four tablets per day of sodium clodronate (2080 mg) or matching placebo for up to 3 years (metastatic disease) or 5 years (non-metastatic). Long-term overall survival was assessed on an intention-to-treat basis in all men at sites in England and Wales using data from the National Health Service Information Centre, which held data for 278 of 311 men in the PR05 trial and 471 of 508 men in the PR04 trial. These studies are registered International Standardised Randomised Controlled Trials, numbers ISRCTN38477744 (PR05) and ISRCTN61384873 (PR04).

FINDINGS

Of the 278 men with metastatic disease, 258 (93%) were reported to have died. Evidence of a benefit for those with metastatic disease from use of sodium clodronate compared with placebo was seen in overall survival (hazard ratio [HR] 0.77, 95% CI 0.60-0.98; p=0.032). Of the 471 men with non-metastatic disease, 281 (60%) were reported to have died, with no evidence of improvement in overall survival with clodronate compared with placebo (HR 1.12, 0.89-1.42; p=0.94).

INTERPRETATION

Long-term data from these trials show that a first-generation bisphosphonate, sodium clodronate, improves overall survival in men with metastatic prostate cancer who are starting hormone therapy, but there is no evidence of an effect in men with non-metastatic prostate cancer.

FUNDING

UK MRC; and an education grant and free drug from Roche Products Ltd.

Preserving functional independence in elderly patients with cancer-associated bone disease: the role of zoledronic acid

Increases in life expectancy in the developed world will inevitably lead to larger numbers of elderly patients with cancer-associated (malignant) bone disease. Most elderly patients with metastatic cancer also suffer from numerous comorbidities. The management of bone health in this setting requires special consideration. This article centers on malignant bone disease in the elderly and the role of bisphosphonates in geriatric oncology. The challenges involved in the treatment of older patients with bone metastases are described, and the potential utility of bisphosphonates, such as zoledronic acid, is discussed. Moreover, recent data from several large clinical trials suggest that zoledronic acid provides additional benefits, including antitumor effects that may extend beyond the preservation of bone health and prevention of skeletal-related events.

Zoledronic acid: a review of its use in breast cancer

Zoledronic acid 4 mg administered as a 15-minute infusion every 3-4 weeks is effective and well tolerated in the treatment of patients with breast cancer metastatic to bone. It is effective in reducing complications arising from metastatic bone disease in this patient population, with a clinical profile that compares favourably with that of pamidronate. Zoledronic acid administered on a less frequent schedule (every 3-6 months) has also shown potential in preventing cancer treatment-induced bone loss in pre- and postmenopausal women with breast cancer receiving adjuvant hormonal therapy. Preliminary data suggest that zoledronic acid may have antitumour effects, which may reduce the risk of overall disease progression in patients with malignant disease. Thus, zoledronic acid has a well established role as first-line treatment in patients with bone metastases secondary to breast cancer, and may prove useful as a preventive treatment for cancer treatment-induced bone loss or an adjuvant therapy in women with breast cancer.

Head and neck manifestations of distant carcinomas

Metastatic tumors to the head and neck from distant carcinomas are rare lesions that epitomize the "zebras." They represent a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge for clinicians and health providers. These lesions usually rank low in the differential diagnosis list, but a history of cancer should prompt clinicians about the possibility of a metastatic lesion from a distant carcinoma. The presence of these lesions usually represents a poor prognosis. The surgeon's role in treating these lesions is to improve or maintain the patient's quality of life, taking into consideration the overall prognosis.

Src as a therapeutic target in men with prostate cancer and bone metastases

While responsive to androgen ablation in its early stages, prostate cancer eventually becomes castration-resistant and metastasizes preferentially to bone. Once this happens, the disease carries considerable morbidity and is incurable. The process of bone metastasis involves a complex interplay between tumour and bone tissue. The eventual characteristic clinical presentation of disorganized osteoblastic bone lesions is preceded by a facilitatory osteoblastic phase; an osteoblastic component then continues to underlie the process. Increasing evidence has shown a ubiquitous role for Src (a proto-oncogene tyrosine-protein kinase) in multiple tumour and bone-signalling processes involved in prostate tumour progression, driving proliferation, survival, migration and transition to androgen-independent growth. It is also intimately involved in positively regulating osteoclast physiology. As such, this molecule represents an attractive target for managing progressing prostate cancer. Encouraging results have been obtained in preclinical and clinical studies using Src inhibitors like AZD0530 and dasatinib. Both compounds reduced markers of bone resorption, in patients with cancer and those with advanced castration-resistant prostate cancer, respectively. Moreover, because Src is central to many mechanisms thought to be responsible for the development of castration resistance, adding Src inhibitors to a treatment regimen might reverse this phenomenon. As a result, many Src inhibitors are in preclinical development. This review explores Src inhibition as a strategy for managing bone metastasis in prostate cancer, with a particular focus on targeting the critical osteoclastic response. Other emerging and novel approaches are also considered.

Effect of pathologic fractures on survival in multiple myeloma patients: a case control study

BACKGROUND

Multiple Myeloma (MM) is a B cell neoplasm characterized by the clonal proliferation of plasma cells. Skeletal complications are found in up to 80% of myeloma patients at presentation and are major cause of morbidity.

METHODS

49 patients were enrolled with MM admitted to Black Sea Technical University Hospital between 2002-2005. Pathologic fractures (PFs) were determined and the patients with or without PF were followed up minimum 3 years for survival analysis.

RESULTS

PF was observed in 24 patients (49%) and not observed in 25 patients (51%). The risk of death was increased in the patients with PF compared with patients who had no fractures. While overall survival was 17.6 months in the patients with PFs, it was 57.3 months in the patients with no PFs.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that PFs may induce reduced survival and increased mortality in the MM patients, however, larger sample size is essential to draw clearer conclusions added to these data.