1
|
Kitamura H, Morizane C, Tanabe N, Go I, Maruki Y, Ohba A, Nagashio Y, Kondo S, Hijioka S, Ueno H, Yoshida T, Okusaka T. Clinical features of germline BRCA1/2 or ATM pathogenic variant positive pancreatic cancer in Japan. Pancreatology 2023; 23:964-969. [PMID: 37914629 DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2023.10.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2023] [Revised: 10/08/2023] [Accepted: 10/22/2023] [Indexed: 11/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There has been increasing interest into the role of germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants (gBRCA PV) and gATM PV and likely PV (PV and LPV; PV + LPV) in the carcinogenesis and treatment of pancreatic cancer (PC), but the clinical features have not been well described. METHODS Patients with confirmed gBRCA PV and gATM PV + LPV PC treated at our hospital between April 2016 and December 2021, were retrospectively evaluated for clinical characteristics and outcomes. RESULTS Twenty-two patients harbored gBRCA PV and three patients harbored gATM PV + LPV. Of the gBRCA PV patients, 81.8 % received platinum-based chemotherapy with favorable treatment outcomes with an objective response rate of 50.0 % (95 % CI: 23.0-77.0), median progression free survival (PFS) of 334 days, and median overall survival (OS) of 926 days from the initiation of first-line chemotherapy. The annual number of patients with gBRCA PV was two patients per year before January 2021 (when BRACAnalysis became available in Japan), and ten patients during the 10 months thereafter. Four patients (20 %) with gBRCA PV developed soft-tissue metastasis with progression. Two patients with gATM PV + LPV received platinum-based chemotherapy and the best response of those patients was partial response and stable disease and their OS from the initiation of first-line chemotherapy was 1192 and 989 days, and PFS was 579 and 140 days, respectively. CONCLUSION The diagnosis of gBRCA PV-positive PC has increased revealed in recent years. These tumors appear to be sensitive to platinum-based chemotherapy, with long term survival observed in gATM PV + LPV-positive patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hidetoshi Kitamura
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Japan
| | - Chigusa Morizane
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Japan.
| | - Noriko Tanabe
- Department of Genetic Medicine and Services, National Cancer Center Hospital, Japan
| | - Ikeda Go
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Japan
| | - Yuta Maruki
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Japan
| | - Akihiro Ohba
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Japan
| | - Yoshikuni Nagashio
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Japan
| | - Shunsuke Kondo
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Japan
| | - Susumu Hijioka
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Japan
| | - Hideki Ueno
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Japan
| | - Teruhiko Yoshida
- Department of Genetic Medicine and Services, National Cancer Center Hospital, Japan
| | - Takuji Okusaka
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Iliesiu A, Toma RV, Ciongariu AM, Costea R, Zarnescu N, Bîlteanu L. A pancreatic adenocarcinoma mimicking hepatoid carcinoma of uncertain histogenesis: A case report and literature review. Oncol Lett 2023; 26:442. [PMID: 37720666 PMCID: PMC10502951 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2023.14029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2022] [Accepted: 06/19/2023] [Indexed: 09/19/2023] Open
Abstract
In rare cases, metastatic adenocarcinomas of different origin may exhibit the features of hepatoid carcinoma (HC), a rare malignant epithelial tumor, most commonly occurring in the ovaries and stomach, as well as in the pancreas and biliary ducts. A case of a 72-year-old female patient who developed a highly aggressive, poorly differentiated pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with peritoneal carcinomatosis, demonstrating hepatoid differentiation upon conventional hematoxylin and eosin staining is reported in the present study. The patient presented with severe abdominal pain, and the radiological investigations performed revealed ovarian and hepatic tumor masses and peritoneal lesions, which were surgically removed. The gross examination of the peritoneum and omentum revealed multiple solid, firm, grey-white nodules, diffusely infiltrating the adipose tissue. The microscopic examination revealed a malignant epithelial proliferation, composed of polygonal cells with abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm and irregular, pleomorphic nuclei. Certain cells presented with intracytoplasmic mucus inclusions, raising suspicion of a HC with an uncertain histogenesis. Immunohistochemical staining was performed, and the tumor cells were found to be positive for cytokeratin (CK)7, CK18 and mucin 5AC, whereas negative staining for CK20, caudal-type homeobox transcription factor 2, α-fetoprotein, paired box gene 8, GATA-binding protein 3 and Wilms tumor 1 were documented. Thus, the diagnosis of metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma was established. The main aim of the present study was to provide further knowledge concerning poorly differentiated metastatic adenocarcinoma resembling HC, emphasizing the histopathological and immunohistochemical features of these malignant lesions and raising awareness of the diagnostic difficulties that may arise, as well as the importance of the use immunohistochemistry in differentiating carcinomas of uncertain histogenesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreea Iliesiu
- Department of Pathology, University Emergency Hospital of Bucharest, Bucharest 014461, Romania
- Faculty of General Medicine, ‘Carol Davila’ University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest 050474, Romania
| | - Radu-Valeriu Toma
- Faculty of General Medicine, ‘Carol Davila’ University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest 050474, Romania
- Oncological Institute ‘Alexandru Trestioreanu’, Bucharest 022328, Romania
| | - Ana Maria Ciongariu
- Department of Pathology, University Emergency Hospital of Bucharest, Bucharest 014461, Romania
- Faculty of General Medicine, ‘Carol Davila’ University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest 050474, Romania
| | - Radu Costea
- Faculty of General Medicine, ‘Carol Davila’ University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest 050474, Romania
- Second Department of Surgery, University Emergency Hospital of Bucharest, Bucharest 050098, Romania
| | - Narcis Zarnescu
- Faculty of General Medicine, ‘Carol Davila’ University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest 050474, Romania
- Second Department of Surgery, University Emergency Hospital of Bucharest, Bucharest 050098, Romania
| | - Liviu Bîlteanu
- Oncological Institute ‘Alexandru Trestioreanu’, Bucharest 022328, Romania
- Department of Preclinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Agronomic Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Bucharest 050097, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Asiri MS, Dabaliz A, Almutairi M, Almahbub A, Alharbi M, Almeman S, AlShieban S, Alotaibi T, Algarni M. Complete Pathological Response to Platinum-Based Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in BRCA2-Associated Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Case Report and Literature Review. Cureus 2023; 15:e43261. [PMID: 37692681 PMCID: PMC10492221 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.43261] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/09/2023] [Indexed: 09/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a lethal malignant disease and is considered the fourth leading cause of death among cancer patients in the United States. Mutations in the BRCA gene, which is a DNA repair gene, increase the risk of PDAC, and among all patients with PDAC, about 8%-10% have a BRCA2 mutation. The finding of gene mutations is associated with a better response to platinum-based chemotherapy. Here, we present a case of a 59-year-old male with a BRCA2 gene mutation who was diagnosed with locally advanced pancreatic cancer and had achieved a complete pathological response to the FOLFIRINOX (leucovorin calcium, fluorouracil, irinotecan hydrochloride, and oxaliplatin) regimen and Whipple procedure. We also present our literature findings on response types in BRCA2 PDAC patients, as well as consensus on the use of different therapies. The use of platinum-based chemotherapy with BRCA2 is highly recommended as the first-line treatment. Most PDAC patients remain untested for BRCA2 mutation even though their genetic status influences the selection of drug regimens. Thus, we recommend genetic testing for everyone with PDAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed S Asiri
- Medicine, College of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, SAU
- Medicine, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, SAU
| | - Alhomam Dabaliz
- Medicine, College of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, SAU
| | - Mahdi Almutairi
- Medicine, College of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, SAU
| | - Abdulaziz Almahbub
- Medicine, College of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, SAU
| | - Mohammed Alharbi
- Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Riyadh, SAU
| | - Sarah Almeman
- Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Riyadh, SAU
| | - Saeed AlShieban
- Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Riyadh, SAU
- Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, College of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, SAU
- Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, SAU
| | - Tareq Alotaibi
- Medical Imaging, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Riyadh, SAU
| | - Mohammed Algarni
- Oncology, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Riyadh, SAU
- Oncology, College of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, SAU
- Oncology, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, SAU
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Second-line therapy in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients with germline BRCA1-2 pathogenic variants (gBRCA1-2pv). Br J Cancer 2023; 128:877-885. [PMID: 36482190 PMCID: PMC9977912 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-022-02086-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2022] [Revised: 11/17/2022] [Accepted: 11/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) harbouring germline BRCA1-2 pathogenic variants (gBRCA1-2pv) is a distinct nosological entity. Information on second-line therapy (2LT) outcome in this setting is lacking. METHODS Data of gBRCA1-2pv metastatic PDAC patients treated with chemotherapy were collected. A primary analysis of 2LT RECIST response, median progression-free survival (mPFS2) and overall survival (mOS2), was performed. A secondary analysis addressed the impact of timing of platinum introduction on the outcome of patients receiving at least a first-line combination chemotherapy (1LT). RESULTS Eighty-four gBRCA1-2pv metastatic PDAC patients were enrolled. The primary analysis, including 43 patients, highlighted a significant improvement of mPFS2 and a doubled response rate, in the platinum-based 2LT subgroup as compared to the platinum-free (8.8 versus 3.7 months, p = 0.013). Seventy-seven patients were included in the secondary analysis. Median PFS1 of 3- and 4-drug platinum-based 1LT significantly outperformed both platinum-free combinations and platinum-based doublets (11.4 versus 6.4 versus 7.9 months, p = 0.01). Albeit still immature, data on mOS paralleled those on mPFS. CONCLUSIONS This study highlighted the beneficial role of platinum agents in gBRCA1-2pv PDAC patients also in second-line treatment setting. However, our data suggest that early use of 3- and 4-drug platinum-based chemotherapy combinations provides a survival outcome advantage.
Collapse
|
5
|
Cui J, Jiao F, Li Q, Wang Z, Fu D, Liang J, Liang H, Xia T, Zhang T, Zhang Y, Dai G, Zhang Z, Wang J, Bai Y, Bai Y, Bi F, Chen D, Cao D, Chen J, Fang W, Gao Y, Guo J, Hao J, Hua H, Huang X, Liu W, Liu X, Li D, Li J, Li E, Li Z, Pan H, Shen L, Sun Y, Tao M, Wang C, Wang F, Xiong J, Zhang T, Zhang X, Zhan X, Zheng L, Ren G, Zhang T, Zhou J, Ma Q, Qin S, Hao C, Wang L. Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO): Clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic cancer. JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER CENTER 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jncc.2022.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
|
6
|
OncoPan®: An NGS-Based Screening Methodology to Identify Molecular Markers for Therapy and Risk Assessment in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Biomedicines 2022; 10:biomedicines10051208. [PMID: 35625944 PMCID: PMC9138989 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10051208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2022] [Revised: 05/17/2022] [Accepted: 05/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer has a high morbidity and mortality with the majority being PC ductal adenocarcinomas (PDAC). Whole genome sequencing provides a wide description of genomic events involved in pancreatic carcinogenesis and identifies putative biomarkers for new therapeutic approaches. However, currently, there are no approved treatments targeting driver mutations in PDAC that could produce clinical benefit for PDAC patients. A proportion of 5–10% of PDAC have a hereditary origin involving germline variants of homologous recombination genes, such as Mismatch Repair (MMR), STK11 and CDKN2A genes. Very recently, BRCA genes have been demonstrated as a useful biomarker for PARP-inhibitor (PARPi) treatments. In this study, a series of 21 FFPE PDACs were analyzed using OncoPan®, a strategic next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel of 37 genes, useful for identification of therapeutic targets and inherited cancer syndromes. Interestingly, this approach, successful also on minute pancreatic specimens, identified biomarkers for personalized therapy in five PDAC patients, including two cases with HER2 amplification and three cases with mutations in HR genes (BRCA1, BRCA2 and FANCM) and potentially eligible to PARPi therapy. Molecular analysis on normal tissue identified one PDAC patient as a carrier of a germline BRCA1 pathogenetic variant and, noteworthy, this patient was a member of a family affected by inherited breast and ovarian cancer conditions. This study demonstrates that the OncoPan® NGS-based panel constitutes an efficient methodology for the molecular profiling of PDAC, suitable for identifying molecular markers both for therapy and risk assessment. Our data demonstrate the feasibility and utility of these NGS analysis in the routine setting of PDAC molecular characterization.
Collapse
|
7
|
Devico Marciano N, Kroening G, Dayyani F, Zell JA, Lee FC, Cho M, Valerin JG. BRCA-Mutated Pancreatic Cancer: From Discovery to Novel Treatment Paradigms. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14102453. [PMID: 35626055 PMCID: PMC9140002 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14102453] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2022] [Revised: 05/02/2022] [Accepted: 05/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Approximately 10–20% of pancreatic cancer patients will have a mutation in their DNA, passed on in families, that contributes to the development of their pancreatic cancer. These mutations are important in that they effect the biology of the disease as well as contribute to sensitivity to specific treatments. We describe the critical role that these genes play in various cellular processes in the body that contribute to their role in cancer development and normal cellular function. In this review, we aim to describe the role of certain genes (BRCA1 and BRCA2) in the development of pancreatic cancer and the current and future research efforts underway to treat this subtype of disease. Abstract The discovery of BRCA1 and BRCA2 in the 1990s revolutionized the way we research and treat breast, ovarian, and pancreatic cancers. In the case of pancreatic cancers, germline mutations occur in about 10–20% of patients, with mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 being the most common. BRCA genes are critical in DNA repair pathways, particularly in homologous recombination, which has a serious impact on genomic stability and can contribute to cancerous cell proliferation. However, BRCA1 also plays a fundamental role in cell cycle checkpoint control, ubiquitination, control of gene expression, and chromatin remodeling, while BRCA2 also plays a role in transcription and immune system response. Therefore, mutations in these genes lead to multiple defects in cells that may be utilized when treating cancer. BRCA mutations seem to confer a prognostic benefit with an improved overall survival due to differing underlying biology. These mutations also appear to be a predictive marker, with patients showing increased sensitivity to certain treatments, such as platinum chemotherapy and PARP inhibitors. Olaparib is currently indicated for maintenance therapy in metastatic PDAC after induction with platinum-based chemotherapy. Resistance has been found to these therapies, and with a 10.8% five-year OS, novel therapies are desperately needed.
Collapse
|
8
|
Zhang X, Mao T, Zhang B, Xu H, Cui J, Jiao F, Chen D, Wang Y, Hu J, Xia Q, Ge W, Li S, Yue M, Ma J, Yao J, Wang Y, Wang Y, Shentu D, Zhang X, Chen S, Bai Y, Wang Y, Zhang X, Liu Q, Sun Y, Fu D, Liu Y, Xiong L, Wang L. Characterization of the genomic landscape in large-scale Chinese patients with pancreatic cancer. EBioMedicine 2022; 77:103897. [PMID: 35231699 PMCID: PMC8886010 DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.103897] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2021] [Revised: 02/10/2022] [Accepted: 02/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a malignant tumor with an extremely poor prognosis. Effective targets for anticancer therapy confirmed in PDAC are limited. However, the characteristics of genomics have not been fully elucidated in large-scale patients with PDAC from China. Methods We collected both blood and tissue samples from 1080 Chinese patients with pancreatic cancer and retrospectively investigated the genomic landscape using next-generation sequencing (NGS). Findings We found recurrent somatic mutations in KRAS (83.2%), TP53 (70.6%), CDKN2A (28.8%), SMAD4 (23.0%), ARID1A (12.8%) and CDKN2B (8.9%) in Chinese PDAC patients. Compared with primary pancreatic cancers, more genomic alterations accumulated especially cell cycle regulatory gene variants (45.4% vs 31.6%, P < 0.001) were observed in metastatic tumors. The most common mutation site of KRAS is p.G12D (43.6%) in pancreatic cancer. Patients with KRAS mutations were significantly associated with older age and mutations in the other three driver genes, while KRAS wild-type patients contained more fusion mutations and alternative mechanisms of RTK/Ras/MAPK pathway including a number of clinically targetable mutations. KRAS mutations in Chinese cohort were significantly lower than those in Western cohorts (all P < 0.05). A total of 252 (23.3%) patients with the core DNA damage response (DDR) gene mutations were detected. ATM (n =59, 5.5%) was the most frequent mutant DDR gene in patients with pancreatic cancer from China. Patients with germline DDR gene mutations were younger (P = 0.018), while patients with somatic DDR gene mutations were more likely to accumulate in metastatic lesions (P < 0.001) and had higher TMB levels (P < 0.001). In addition, patients with mutant DDR genes and patients carrying TP53 mutation were observed mutually exclusive (P < 0.001). Interpretation We demonstrated the real-world genomic characteristics of large-scale patients with pancreatic cancer from China which may have promising implications for further clinical significance and drug development. Funding The funders are listed in the Acknowledgement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaofei Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncogenes and Related Genes, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Department of Oncology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Tiebo Mao
- State Key Laboratory of Oncogenes and Related Genes, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Department of Oncology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Bei Zhang
- The Medical Department, 3D Medicines Inc., Shanghai, China
| | - Haiyan Xu
- State Key Laboratory of Oncogenes and Related Genes, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Department of Oncology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jiujie Cui
- State Key Laboratory of Oncogenes and Related Genes, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Department of Oncology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Feng Jiao
- State Key Laboratory of Oncogenes and Related Genes, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Department of Oncology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Dongqin Chen
- State Key Laboratory of Oncogenes and Related Genes, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Department of Oncology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yu Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncogenes and Related Genes, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Department of Oncology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jiong Hu
- State Key Laboratory of Oncogenes and Related Genes, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Department of Oncology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Qing Xia
- State Key Laboratory of Oncogenes and Related Genes, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Department of Oncology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Weiyu Ge
- State Key Laboratory of Oncogenes and Related Genes, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Department of Oncology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Shumin Li
- State Key Laboratory of Oncogenes and Related Genes, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Department of Oncology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Ming Yue
- State Key Laboratory of Oncogenes and Related Genes, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Department of Oncology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jingyu Ma
- State Key Laboratory of Oncogenes and Related Genes, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Department of Oncology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jiayu Yao
- State Key Laboratory of Oncogenes and Related Genes, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Department of Oncology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yongchao Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncogenes and Related Genes, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Department of Oncology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yanling Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncogenes and Related Genes, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Department of Oncology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Daiyuan Shentu
- State Key Laboratory of Oncogenes and Related Genes, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Department of Oncology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiao Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncogenes and Related Genes, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Department of Oncology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Shiqing Chen
- The Medical Department, 3D Medicines Inc., Shanghai, China
| | - Yuezong Bai
- The Medical Department, 3D Medicines Inc., Shanghai, China
| | - Yuexiang Wang
- Head of Laboratory of Cancer Progression and Translational Medicine Shanghai Institute of Nutrition and Health, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China
| | - Xuebin Zhang
- Department of Interventional Oncology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Qiang Liu
- Department of Pathology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yongwei Sun
- Department of Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Deliang Fu
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Pancreatic Disease Institute, Huashan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yingbin Liu
- Department of Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Lei Xiong
- The Medical Department, 3D Medicines Inc., Shanghai, China.
| | - Liwei Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncogenes and Related Genes, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Department of Oncology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Identification of New Regulators of Pancreatic Cancer Cell Sensitivity to Oxaliplatin and Cisplatin. MOLECULES (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2022; 27:molecules27041289. [PMID: 35209078 PMCID: PMC8875979 DOI: 10.3390/molecules27041289] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2021] [Revised: 02/09/2022] [Accepted: 02/10/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
The chemoresistance of tumor cells is one of the most urgent challenges in modern oncology and in pancreatic cancer, in which this problem is the most prominent. Therefore, the identification of new chemosensitizing co-targets may be a path toward increasing chemotherapy efficacy. In this work, we performed high-performance in vitro knockout CRISPR/Cas9 screening to find potential regulators of the sensitivity of pancreatic cancer. For this purpose, MIA PaCa-2 cells transduced with two sgRNA libraries (“cell cycle/nuclear proteins genes” and “genome-wide”) were screened by oxaliplatin and cisplatin. In total, 173 candidate genes were identified as potential regulators of pancreatic cancer cell sensitivity to oxaliplatin and/or cisplatin; among these, 25 genes have previously been reported, while 148 genes were identified for the first time as potential platinum drug sensitivity regulators. We found seven candidate genes involved in pancreatic cancer cell sensitivity to both cisplatin and oxaliplatin. Gene ontology enrichment analysis reveals the enrichment of single-stranded DNA binding, damaged DNA binding pathways, and four associated with NADH dehydrogenase activity. Further investigation and validation of the obtained results by in vitro, in vivo, and bioinformatics approaches, as well as literature analysis, will help to identify novel pancreatic cancer platinum sensitivity regulators.
Collapse
|
10
|
Epidemiology and Geographic distribution of BRCA1-2 and DNA Damage Response genes pathogenic variants in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients. Cancer Treat Rev 2022; 104:102357. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2022.102357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2021] [Revised: 02/01/2022] [Accepted: 02/05/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
11
|
Molecular Features and Clinical Management of Hereditary Pancreatic Cancer Syndromes and Familial Pancreatic Cancer. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:ijms23031205. [PMID: 35163129 PMCID: PMC8835700 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23031205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2021] [Revised: 01/16/2022] [Accepted: 01/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Hereditary pancreatic cancers are caused by several inherited genes. Familial pancreatic cancer is defined as pancreatic cancer arising in a patient with at least two first-degree relatives with pancreatic cancer in the absence of an identified genetic cause. Hereditary pancreatic cancer syndromes and familial pancreatic cancers account for about 10% of pancreatic cancer cases. Germline mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2, ATM, PALB2, CDKN2A, STK11, and TP53 and mismatch repair genes (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2, and EPCAM) are among the well-known inherited susceptibility genes. Currently available targeted medications include poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARP) for cases with mutant BRCA and immune checkpoint inhibitors for cases with mismatch repair deficiency. Loss of heterozygosity of hereditary pancreatic cancer susceptibility genes such as BRCA1/2 plays a key role in carcinogenesis and sensitivity to PARP inhibitors. Signature 3 identified by whole genome sequencing is also associated with homologous recombination deficiency and sensitivity to targeted therapies. In this review, we summarize molecular features and treatments of hereditary pancreatic cancer syndromes and surveillance procedures for unaffected high-risk cases. We also review transgenic murine models to gain a better understanding of carcinogenesis in hereditary pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
|
12
|
Park JH, Jo JH, Jang SI, Chung MJ, Park JY, Bang S, Park SW, Song SY, Lee HS, Cho JH. BRCA 1/2 Germline Mutation Predicts the Treatment Response of FOLFIRINOX with Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma in Korean Patients. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14010236. [PMID: 35008403 PMCID: PMC8750183 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14010236] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2021] [Revised: 12/28/2021] [Accepted: 12/28/2021] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
We evaluated the proportion of BRCA 1/2 germline mutations in Korean patients with sporadic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and its effect on the chemotherapeutic response of FOLFIRINOX. This retrospective study included patients who were treated at two tertiary hospitals between 2012 and 2020, were pathologically confirmed to have PDAC, and had undergone targeted next-generation sequencing-based germline genetic testing. Sixty-six patients were included in the study (24 men; median age 57.5 years). In the germline test, BRCA 1/2 pathogenic mutations were found in nine patients (9/66, 13%, BRCA 1, n = 3; BRCA 2, n = 5; and BRCA 1/2, n = 1). There was no significant difference in the baseline characteristics according to BRCA mutation positivity. Among patients who underwent FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy, patients with a BRCA 1/2 mutation showed a higher overall response rate than those without a BRCA 1/2 mutation (71.4% vs. 13.9%, p = 0.004). Patients with a germline BRCA 1/2 mutation showed longer progression-free survival than those without a BRCA 1/2 mutation, without a significant time difference (18 months vs. 10 months, p = 0.297). Patients with a BRCA 1/2 mutation in the germline blood test had a higher response rate to FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy in PDAC. The high proportion of BRCA 1/2 germline mutations and response rate supports the need for germline testing in order to predict better treatment response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ji Hoon Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Korea; (J.H.P.); (J.H.J.); (M.J.C.); (J.Y.P.); (S.B.); (S.W.P.); (S.Y.S.)
| | - Jung Hyun Jo
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Korea; (J.H.P.); (J.H.J.); (M.J.C.); (J.Y.P.); (S.B.); (S.W.P.); (S.Y.S.)
| | - Sung Ill Jang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 06273, Korea;
| | - Moon Jae Chung
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Korea; (J.H.P.); (J.H.J.); (M.J.C.); (J.Y.P.); (S.B.); (S.W.P.); (S.Y.S.)
| | - Jeong Youp Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Korea; (J.H.P.); (J.H.J.); (M.J.C.); (J.Y.P.); (S.B.); (S.W.P.); (S.Y.S.)
| | - Seungmin Bang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Korea; (J.H.P.); (J.H.J.); (M.J.C.); (J.Y.P.); (S.B.); (S.W.P.); (S.Y.S.)
| | - Seung Woo Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Korea; (J.H.P.); (J.H.J.); (M.J.C.); (J.Y.P.); (S.B.); (S.W.P.); (S.Y.S.)
| | - Si Young Song
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Korea; (J.H.P.); (J.H.J.); (M.J.C.); (J.Y.P.); (S.B.); (S.W.P.); (S.Y.S.)
| | - Hee Seung Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Korea; (J.H.P.); (J.H.J.); (M.J.C.); (J.Y.P.); (S.B.); (S.W.P.); (S.Y.S.)
- Correspondence: (H.S.L.); (J.H.C.); Tel.: +82-2-2228-1935 (H.S.L.); +82-2-2019-3310 (J.H.C.)
| | - Jae Hee Cho
- Department of Internal Medicine, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 06273, Korea;
- Correspondence: (H.S.L.); (J.H.C.); Tel.: +82-2-2228-1935 (H.S.L.); +82-2-2019-3310 (J.H.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Meneses-Medina MI, Gervaso L, Cella CA, Pellicori S, Gandini S, Sousa MJ, Fazio N. Chemotherapy in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: when cytoreduction is the aim. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Treat Rev 2022; 104:102338. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2022.102338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2021] [Revised: 01/11/2022] [Accepted: 01/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
|
14
|
Evolving pancreatic cancer treatment: From diagnosis to healthcare management. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2021; 169:103571. [PMID: 34923121 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2021.103571] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2020] [Accepted: 12/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The prognosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is still the worst among solid tumors. In this review, a panel of experts addressed the main unanswered questions about the clinical management of this disease, with the aim of providing practical decision support for physicians. On the basis of the evidence available from the literature, the main topics concerning pancreatic cancer are discussed: the diagnosis, as the need for a pathological characterization and the role for germ-line and somatic molecular profiling; the therapeutic management of resectable disease, as the role of upfront surgery or neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the post-operative restaging and the optimal timing foradjuvant chemotherapy, the management of the borderline resectable and locally advanced disease; the metastatic disease and the role of surgery for the management of patients with isolated metastasis and the use of biomarkers of metastatic potential; the role of supportive care and the healthcare management of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
Collapse
|
15
|
Muggilli M, Russell D, Zhou Z. Comparison of programmed death ligand 1 immunostaining for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma between paired cytological and surgical samples. Cytojournal 2021; 18:28. [PMID: 34876919 PMCID: PMC8645468 DOI: 10.25259/cytojournal_78_2020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2020] [Accepted: 09/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has a poor prognosis with surgery or chemotherapy. Programmed death ligand 1 expression (PD-L1) immunotherapy has been successful for treating lung and other cancers with PD-L1 expression. However, in many unresectable PDAC cases, cytological samples are the only available tissues for PD-L1 testing. The aim of this study is to retrospectively compare the expression of PD-L1 using cytological and surgical samples. Material and Methods: Paired formalin-fixed cell blocks and surgical samples from the same patients with confirmed diagnoses of PDAC (n = 28) were sectioned for PD-L1 immunohistochemistry. Using tumor proportion score (TPS) and combined positive score (CPS) to evaluate paired cell blocks and surgical samples, we counted and analyzed the data. Results: With TPS, the PD-L1 was expressed in 9/28 (32%) of PDAC surgical samples and in 9/28 (32%) of paired cytological samples. Overall, the PD-L1 expression had a correlation of 26/28 (93%). With CPS, the PD-L1 was expressed in 20/28 (71%) of PDAC surgical samples and in 16/28 (57%) of paired cytological samples. The PD-L1 expression had a correlation of 20/28 (71%) and a discrepancy of 8/28 (29%). The PD-L1 expression was significantly higher in moderately-differentiated PDAC than in well-differentiated with TPS. Conclusion: Cytological samples are useful for evaluating PD-L1 expression with TPS because the concordant rate was 93%. With CPS, cytological samples are limited due to the scant inflammatory cells with the concordant rate of 71%. Extensive sampling of the pancreatic tumor may improve the detection of immune cells expressing PD-L1 in cytological samples. With TPS, PD-L1 expression was significantly higher in moderate-differentiation of PDAC than in poor- and well-differentiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Muggilli
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicne, Oklahoma, United States
| | - Donna Russell
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Rochester, Rochester, New Jersey, United States
| | - Zhongren Zhou
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Barros AG, Pulido CF, Machado M, Brito MJ, Couto N, Sousa O, Melo SA, Mansinho H. Treatment optimization of locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer (Review). Int J Oncol 2021; 59:110. [PMID: 34859257 PMCID: PMC8651228 DOI: 10.3892/ijo.2021.5290] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2021] [Accepted: 10/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most lethal malignant tumor types, being the sixth leading cause of mortality worldwide and the fourth in Europe. Globally, it has a mortality/incidence ratio of 98%, and the 5‑year survival rate in Europe is only 3%. Although risk factors, such as obesity, diabetes mellitus, smoking, alcohol consumption and genetic factors, have been identified, the causes of PDAC remain elusive. Additionally, the only curative treatment for PDAC is surgery with negative margins. However, upon diagnosis, ~30% of the patients already present with locally advanced disease. In these cases, a multidisciplinary approach is required to improve disease‑related symptoms and prolong patient survival. In the present article, a comprehensive review of PDAC epidemiology, physiology and treatment is provided. Moreover, guidelines on patient treatment are suggested. Among the different available therapeutic options for the treatment of advanced PDAC, results are modest, most likely due to the complexity of the disease, and so the prognostic remains poor. Molecular approaches based on multi‑omics research are promising and will contribute to groundbreaking personalized medicine. Thus, economic investment that promotes research of pancreatic cancer will be critical to the development of more efficient diagnostic and treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anabela G. Barros
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Coimbra, 3004-561 Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Catarina F. Pulido
- Department of Medical Oncology, Luz Lisbon Hospital, 1500-650 Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Manuela Machado
- Department of Medical Oncology, Entre o Douro e Vouga Hospital Center (CHEDV), 4520-211 Santa Maria da Feira, Portugal
| | - Maria José Brito
- Pathologic Anatomy Department, Garcia de Orta Hospital, 2805-267 Almada, Portugal
| | - Nuno Couto
- Digestive Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Centre, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal
- Champalimaud Research Centre, 1400-038 Lisbon, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal
| | - Olga Sousa
- Radiotherapy Department, Portuguese Institute of Oncology, 4200-072 Porto, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal
| | - Sónia A. Melo
- i3S-Institute for Research and Innovation in Health of University of Porto, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal
- IPATIMUP-Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology of University of Porto, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal
| | - Hélder Mansinho
- Hemato-Oncology Department, Garcia de Orta Hospital, 2805-267 Almada, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Orsi G, Di Marco M, Cavaliere A, Niger M, Bozzarelli S, Giordano G, Noventa S, Rapposelli IG, Garajova I, Tortora G, Rodriquenz MG, Bittoni A, Penzo E, De Lorenzo S, Peretti U, Paratore C, Bernardini I, Mosconi S, Spallanzani A, Macchini M, Tamburini E, Bencardino K, Giommoni E, Scartozzi M, Forti L, Valente MM, Militello AM, Cascinu S, Milella M, Reni M. Chemotherapy toxicity and activity in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and germline BRCA1-2 pathogenic variants (gBRCA1-2pv): a multicenter survey. ESMO Open 2021; 6:100238. [PMID: 34392104 PMCID: PMC8371213 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2021] [Revised: 07/15/2021] [Accepted: 07/20/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Germline BRCA1-2 pathogenic variants (gBRCA1-2pv)-related pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) showed increased sensitivity to DNA cross-linking agents. This study aimed at exploring safety profile, dose intensity, and activity of different chemotherapy regimens in this setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS gBRCA1-2pv PDAC patients of any age and clinical tumor stage who completed a first course of chemotherapy were eligible. A descriptive analysis of chemotherapy toxicity, dose intensity, response, and survival outcomes was performed. RESULTS A total of 85 gBRCA1-2pv PDAC patients treated in 21 Italian centers between December 2008 and March 2021were enrolled. Seventy-four patients were assessable for toxicity and dose intensity, 83 for outcome. Dose intensity was as follows: nab-paclitaxel 72%, gemcitabine 76% (AG); cisplatin 75%, nab-paclitaxel 73%, capecitabine 73%, and gemcitabine 65% (PAXG); fluorouracil 35%, irinotecan 58%, and oxaliplatin 64% (FOLFIRINOX). When compared with the literature, grade 3-4 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and diarrhea were increased with PAXG, and unmodified with AG and FOLFIRINOX. RECIST responses were numerically higher with the three- (81%) or four-drug (73%) platinum-containing regimens that outperformed AG (41%) and oxaliplatin-based doublets (56%). Carbohydrate antigen 19.9 (CA19.9) reduction >89% at nadir was reported in two-third of metastatic patients treated with triplets and quadruplets, as opposed to 33% and 45% of patients receiving oxaliplatin-based doublets or AG, respectively. All patients receiving AG experienced disease progression, with a median progression-free survival (mPFS) of 6.4 months, while patients treated with platinum-containing triplets or quadruplets had an mPFS >10.8 months. Albeit still immature, data on overall survival seemed to parallel those on PFS. CONCLUSIONS Our data, as opposed to figures expected from the literature, highlighted that platinum-based regimens provoked an increased toxicity on proliferating cells, when dose intensity was maintained, or an as-expected toxicity, when dose intensity was reduced, while no change in toxicity and dose intensity was evident with AG. Furthermore, an apparently improved outcome of platinum-based triplets or quadruplets over other regimens was observed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Orsi
- Medical Oncology Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - M Di Marco
- Medical Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy; Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, S. Orsola - Malpighi University Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - A Cavaliere
- Section of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Verona School of Medicine and Verona University Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - M Niger
- Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - S Bozzarelli
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Humanitas Cancer Center, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Rozzano (Milan), Italy
| | - G Giordano
- Unit of Medical Oncology and Biomolecular Therapy, Policlinico Riuniti, Foggia, Italy; Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - S Noventa
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero, Brescia, Italy
| | - I G Rapposelli
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori "Dino Amadori" - IRST, Meldola, Italy
| | - I Garajova
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - G Tortora
- Unit of Medical Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario, Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy; Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - M G Rodriquenz
- Oncology Unit, Ospedale IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, San Giovanni Rotondo (FG), Italy
| | - A Bittoni
- Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti Umberto I, GM Lancisi, G Salesi di Ancona, Ancona, Italy
| | - E Penzo
- Medical Oncology Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - S De Lorenzo
- Medical Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - U Peretti
- Medical Oncology Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - C Paratore
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Ordine Mauriziano Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - I Bernardini
- Medical Oncology Unit, Ospedale Ramazzini, Carpi (MO), Italy
| | - S Mosconi
- Oncology Unit, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | - A Spallanzani
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - M Macchini
- Medical Oncology Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - E Tamburini
- Medical Oncology and Palliative Care Department, Azienda Ospedaliera Cardinale G. Panico, Tricase-Lecce, Italy
| | - K Bencardino
- Niguarda Cancer Center, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - E Giommoni
- Medical Oncology Division, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Firenze, Italy
| | - M Scartozzi
- Medical Oncology, University and University Hospital, Cagliari, Italy
| | - L Forti
- Medical Oncology Division, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Maggiore della Carità, Novara, Italy
| | - M M Valente
- Medical Oncology Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - A M Militello
- Medical Oncology Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - S Cascinu
- Medical Oncology Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - M Milella
- Section of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Verona School of Medicine and Verona University Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - M Reni
- Medical Oncology Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Macchini M, Centonze F, Peretti U, Orsi G, Militello AM, Valente MM, Cascinu S, Reni M. Treatment opportunities and future perspectives for pancreatic cancer patients with germline BRCA1-2 pathogenic variants. Cancer Treat Rev 2021; 100:102262. [PMID: 34418781 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2021.102262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2021] [Revised: 07/17/2021] [Accepted: 07/19/2021] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Personalized treatments and predictive biomarkers of pancreatic cancer (PDAC) are still lacking. Recently germline mutations in BRCA 1 and 2 genes, leading to homologous repair deficiency, have emerged as new targets for more specific and effective therapies, exploiting the increased susceptibility to platinum salts and PARP inhibitors. In addition to BRCA, pathogenic variants in PALB2 and in other genes involved in the DNA damage response pathway (DDR) represent potential targets, as well as their respective somatic alterations. This enlarged molecularly-selected population sharing the BRCAness phenotype, is expected to show a higher sensibility to a number of DNA damaging agents and DDR inhibitors. However, the possibility of new therapeutic opportunities for DDR defective PDAC patients has to face the lack of solid evidence about the proper type and timing of targeted-treatments, the potential combination strategies and most importantly, the lack of informations on the functional impact of each specific pathogenic variant on the DDR pathway. This review summarizes the current and near-future options for the clinical management of PDAC patients harboring a DDR deficiency, analyzing the state of the art of the indications of platinum salts and other cytotoxic agents in the advanced and early stage PDAC, the development of PARP inhibitors and the rational for new combinations with immunotherapy and cycle checkpoint inhibitors, as well as the strategy to overcome the development of resistance over treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marina Macchini
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy; Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Federico Centonze
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy; Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Umberto Peretti
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy; Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Giulia Orsi
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy; Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Anna Maria Militello
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy; Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Maddalena Valente
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy; Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Cascinu
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy; Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Michele Reni
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy; Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Rosen MN, Goodwin RA, Vickers MM. BRCA mutated pancreatic cancer: A change is coming. World J Gastroenterol 2021; 27:1943-1958. [PMID: 34007132 PMCID: PMC8108028 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i17.1943] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2021] [Revised: 03/04/2021] [Accepted: 04/13/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer remains a leading cause of cancer-related death with few available therapies for advanced disease. Recently, patients with germline BRCA mutations have received increased attention due to advances in the management of BRCA mutated ovarian and breast tumors. Germline BRCA mutations significantly increase risk of developing pancreatic cancer and can be found in up to 8% of patients with sporadic pancreatic cancer. In patients with germline BRCA mutations, platinum-based chemotherapies and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors are effective treatment options which may offer survival benefits. This review will focus on the molecular biology, epidemiology, and management of BRCA-mutated pancreatic cancer. Furthermore, we will discuss future directions for this area of research and promising active areas of research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael N Rosen
- Faculty of Medicine, The University of Ottawa, Ottawa K1H 8L6, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rachel A Goodwin
- Faculty of Medicine, The University of Ottawa, Ottawa K1H 8L6, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michael M Vickers
- The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Center, The University of Ottawa, Ottawa K1H 8L6, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Perkhofer L, Gout J, Roger E, Kude de Almeida F, Baptista Simões C, Wiesmüller L, Seufferlein T, Kleger A. DNA damage repair as a target in pancreatic cancer: state-of-the-art and future perspectives. Gut 2021; 70:606-617. [PMID: 32855305 PMCID: PMC7873425 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-319984] [Citation(s) in RCA: 102] [Impact Index Per Article: 34.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2020] [Revised: 06/12/2020] [Accepted: 07/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Complex rearrangement patterns and mitotic errors are hallmarks of most pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDAC), a disease with dismal prognosis despite some therapeutic advances in recent years. DNA double-strand breaks (DSB) bear the greatest risk of provoking genomic instability, and DNA damage repair (DDR) pathways are crucial in preserving genomic integrity following a plethora of damage types. Two major repair pathways dominate DSB repair for safeguarding the genome integrity: non-homologous end joining and homologous recombination (HR). Defective HR, but also alterations in other DDR pathways, such as BRCA1, BRCA2, ATM and PALB2, occur frequently in both inherited and sporadic PDAC. Personalised treatment of pancreatic cancer is still in its infancy and predictive biomarkers are lacking. DDR deficiency might render a PDAC vulnerable to a potential new therapeutic intervention that increases the DNA damage load beyond a tolerable threshold, as for example, induced by poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors. The Pancreas Cancer Olaparib Ongoing (POLO) trial, in which olaparib as a maintenance treatment improved progression-free survival compared with placebo after platinum-based induction chemotherapy in patients with PDAC and germline BRCA1/2 mutations, raised great hopes of a substantially improved outcome for this patient subgroup. This review summarises the relationship between DDR and PDAC, the prevalence and characteristics of DNA repair mutations and options for the clinical management of patients with PDAC and DNA repair deficiency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lukas Perkhofer
- Department of Internal Medicine 1, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Johann Gout
- Department of Internal Medicine 1, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Elodie Roger
- Department of Internal Medicine 1, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | | | - Carolina Baptista Simões
- Hospital de Santa Maria, Centro Hospitalar De Lisboa Norte E.P.E. (CHLN), Gastroenterology, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Lisa Wiesmüller
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
| | - Thomas Seufferlein
- Department of Internal Medicine 1, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Alexander Kleger
- Department of Internal Medicine 1, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Peretti U, Cavaliere A, Niger M, Tortora G, Di Marco MC, Rodriquenz MG, Centonze F, Rapposelli IG, Giordano G, De Vita F, Stuppia L, Avallone A, Ratti M, Paratore C, Forti LG, Orsi G, Valente MM, Gaule M, Macchini M, Carrera P, Calzavara S, Simbolo M, Melisi D, De Braud F, Salvatore L, De Lorenzo S, Chiarazzo C, Falconi M, Cascinu S, Milella M, Reni M. Germinal BRCA1-2 pathogenic variants (gBRCA1-2pv) and pancreatic cancer: epidemiology of an Italian patient cohort. ESMO Open 2021; 6:100032. [PMID: 33399070 PMCID: PMC7807989 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2020.100032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2020] [Revised: 11/26/2020] [Accepted: 11/27/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Germline BRCA1-2 pathogenic variants (gBRCApv) increase the risk of pancreatic cancer and predict for response to platinating agents and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors. Data on worldwide gBRCApv incidence among pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients are sparse and describe a remarkable geographic heterogeneity. The aim of this study is to analyze the epidemiology of gBRCApv in Italian patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients of any age with pancreatic adenocarcinoma, screened within 3 months from diagnosis for gBRCApv in Italian oncologic centers systematically performing tests without any selection. For the purposes of our analysis, breast, ovarian, pancreas, and prostate cancer in a patient's family history was considered as potentially BRCA-associated. Patients or disease characteristics were examined using the χ2 test or Fisher's exact test for qualitative variables and the Student's t-test or Mann-Whitney test for continuous variables, as appropriate. RESULTS Between June 2015 and May 2020, 939 patients were tested by 14 Italian centers; 492 (52%) males, median age 62 years (range 28-87), 569 (61%) metastatic, 273 (29%) with a family history of potentially BRCA-associated cancers. gBRCA1-2pv were found in 76 patients (8.1%; 9.1% in metastatic; 6.4% in non-metastatic). The gBRCA2/gBRCA1 ratio was 5.4 : 1. Patients with gBRCApv were younger compared with wild-type (59 versus 62 years, P = 0.01). The gBRCApv rate was 17.1% among patients <40 years old, 10.4% among patients 41-50 years old, 9.2% among patients 51-60 years old, 6.7% among patients aged 61-70 years, and 6.2% among patients >70 years old (none out of 94 patients >73 years old). gBRCApv frequency in 845 patients <74 years old was 9%. Patients with/without a family history of potentially BRCA-associated tumors had 14%/6% mutations. CONCLUSION Based on our findings of a gBRCApv incidence higher than expected in a real-life series of Italian patients with incident PDAC, we recommend screening all PDAC patients <74 years old, regardless of family history and stage, due to the therapeutic implications and cancer risk prevention in patients' relatives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- U Peretti
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, 'Vita-Salute' University, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - A Cavaliere
- Section of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Verona School of Medicine and Verona University Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - M Niger
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - G Tortora
- Department of Medicine, Section of Medical Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - M C Di Marco
- Medical Oncology Division, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine - DIMES, University of Bologna, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy; Medical Oncology Division, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - M G Rodriquenz
- Oncology Unit, foundation IRCCS Casa Sollievo della sofferenza, San Giovanni Rotondo, Foggia, Italy
| | - F Centonze
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, 'Vita-Salute' University, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - I G Rapposelli
- Department of Medical Oncology, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy
| | - G Giordano
- Department of Medical Oncology, Policlinico Riuniti, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitarià, Foggia, Italy
| | - F De Vita
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, School of Medicine, 'Luigi Vanvitelli' University of Campania, Naples, Italy
| | - L Stuppia
- Medical Genetics, Department of Psychological, Health and Territorial Sciences Center for Advanced Sciences and Technology G. d'Annunzio University Chieti-Pescara Italy, Chieti, Italy
| | - A Avallone
- Experimental Clinical Abdominal Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori- IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - M Ratti
- Department of Oncology, Medical Department, ASST di Cremona, Ospedale di Cremona, Cremona, Italy
| | - C Paratore
- Chiara Paratore, University of Turin, Ordine Mauriziano Hospital, Largo Filippo Turati, Turin, Italy
| | - L G Forti
- SCDU Oncologia, AOU Maggiore della Carità, Novara, Italy
| | - G Orsi
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, 'Vita-Salute' University, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - M M Valente
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, 'Vita-Salute' University, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - M Gaule
- Section of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Verona School of Medicine and Verona University Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - M Macchini
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, 'Vita-Salute' University, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - P Carrera
- Clinical Genomics - Molecular Genetics Service, Genomics for Diagnosis of Human Diseases, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - S Calzavara
- Clinical Genomics - Molecular Genetics Service, Genomics for Diagnosis of Human Diseases, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - M Simbolo
- Section of Pathology, Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona School of Medicine and Verona University Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - D Melisi
- Section of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Verona School of Medicine and Verona University Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - F De Braud
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - L Salvatore
- Department of Medicine, Section of Medical Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - S De Lorenzo
- Medical Oncology Division, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - C Chiarazzo
- Oncology Unit, foundation IRCCS Casa Sollievo della sofferenza, San Giovanni Rotondo, Foggia, Italy
| | - M Falconi
- Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, 'Vita-Salute' University, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Department of Surgery, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - S Cascinu
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, 'Vita-Salute' University, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - M Milella
- Section of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Verona School of Medicine and Verona University Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - M Reni
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, 'Vita-Salute' University, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Molinaro E, Andrikou K, Casadei-Gardini A, Rovesti G. BRCA in Gastrointestinal Cancers: Current Treatments and Future Perspectives. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:E3346. [PMID: 33198203 PMCID: PMC7697442 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12113346] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2020] [Revised: 10/26/2020] [Accepted: 11/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
A strong association between pancreatic cancer and BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations is documented. Based on promising results of breast and ovarian cancers, several clinical trials with poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) are ongoing for gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies, especially for pancreatic cancer. Indeed, the POLO trial results provide promising and awaited changes for the pancreatic cancer therapeutic landscape. Contrariwise, for other gastrointestinal tumors, the rationale is currently only alleged. The role of BRCA mutation in gastrointestinal cancers is the subject of this review. In particular, we aim to provide the latest updates about novel therapeutic strategies that, exploiting DNA repair defects, promise to shape the future therapeutic scenario of GI cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Andrea Casadei-Gardini
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Division of Oncology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41121 Modena, Italy; (E.M.); (K.A.); (G.R.)
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Wang Y, Park JYP, Pacis A, Denroche RE, Jang GH, Zhang A, Cuggia A, Domecq C, Monlong J, Raitses-Gurevich M, Grant RC, Borgida A, Holter S, Stossel C, Bu S, Masoomian M, Lungu IM, Bartlett JM, Wilson JM, Gao ZH, Riazalhosseini Y, Asselah J, Bouganim N, Cabrera T, Boucher LM, Valenti D, Biagi J, Greenwood CM, Polak P, Foulkes WD, Golan T, O'Kane GM, Fischer SE, Knox JJ, Gallinger S, Zogopoulos G. A Preclinical Trial and Molecularly Annotated Patient Cohort Identify Predictive Biomarkers in Homologous Recombination–deficient Pancreatic Cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2020; 26:5462-5476. [DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-20-1439] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2020] [Revised: 06/24/2020] [Accepted: 08/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose:
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) arising in patients with a germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 (gBRCA) mutation may be sensitive to platinum and PARP inhibitors (PARPi). However, treatment stratification based on gBRCA mutational status alone is associated with heterogeneous responses.
Experimental Design:
We performed a seven-arm preclinical trial consisting of 471 mice, representing 12 unique PDAC patient-derived xenografts, of which nine were gBRCA mutated. From 179 patients whose PDAC was whole-genome and transcriptome sequenced, we identified 21 cases with homologous recombination deficiency (HRD), and investigated prognostic biomarkers.
Results:
We found that biallelic inactivation of BRCA1/BRCA2 is associated with genomic hallmarks of HRD and required for cisplatin and talazoparib (PARPi) sensitivity. However, HRD genomic hallmarks persisted in xenografts despite the emergence of therapy resistance, indicating the presence of a genomic scar. We identified tumor polyploidy and a low Ki67 index as predictors of poor cisplatin and talazoparib response. In patients with HRD PDAC, tumor polyploidy and a basal-like transcriptomic subtype were independent predictors of shorter survival. To facilitate clinical assignment of transcriptomic subtype, we developed a novel pragmatic two-marker assay (GATA6:KRT17).
Conclusions:
In summary, we propose a predictive and prognostic model of gBRCA-mutated PDAC on the basis of HRD genomic hallmarks, Ki67 index, tumor ploidy, and transcriptomic subtype.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yifan Wang
- 1Rosalind and Morris Goodman Cancer Research Centre of McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- 2Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Jin Yong Patrick Park
- 1Rosalind and Morris Goodman Cancer Research Centre of McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- 2Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Alain Pacis
- 1Rosalind and Morris Goodman Cancer Research Centre of McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- 3Canadian Centre for Computational Genomics, McGill University and Genome Quebec Innovation Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | | | - Gun Ho Jang
- 4Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Amy Zhang
- 4Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Adeline Cuggia
- 1Rosalind and Morris Goodman Cancer Research Centre of McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- 2Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Celine Domecq
- 1Rosalind and Morris Goodman Cancer Research Centre of McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- 2Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Jean Monlong
- 5Department of Human Genetics, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Maria Raitses-Gurevich
- 6Pancreatic Cancer Translational Research Laboratory, Oncology Institute, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Robert C. Grant
- 4Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- 7Wallace McCain Centre for Pancreatic Cancer, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ayelet Borgida
- 8Lunenfeld Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Spring Holter
- 8Lunenfeld Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Chani Stossel
- 6Pancreatic Cancer Translational Research Laboratory, Oncology Institute, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Ramat Gan, Israel
- 9Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Simeng Bu
- 1Rosalind and Morris Goodman Cancer Research Centre of McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- 2Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Mehdi Masoomian
- 10Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ilinca M. Lungu
- 4Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - John M.S. Bartlett
- 4Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- 10Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Julie M. Wilson
- 4Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Zu-Hua Gao
- 11Department of Pathology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | | | - Jamil Asselah
- 12Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | | | - Tatiana Cabrera
- 13Department of Diagnostic Radiology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Louis-Martin Boucher
- 13Department of Diagnostic Radiology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - David Valenti
- 13Department of Diagnostic Radiology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - James Biagi
- 14Department of Oncology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Celia M.T. Greenwood
- 5Department of Human Genetics, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- 12Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- 15Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- 16Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Paz Polak
- 17Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York
| | - William D. Foulkes
- 2Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- 5Department of Human Genetics, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Talia Golan
- 6Pancreatic Cancer Translational Research Laboratory, Oncology Institute, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Ramat Gan, Israel
- 9Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Grainne M. O'Kane
- 4Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- 7Wallace McCain Centre for Pancreatic Cancer, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sandra E. Fischer
- 10Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jennifer J. Knox
- 7Wallace McCain Centre for Pancreatic Cancer, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Steven Gallinger
- 4Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- 7Wallace McCain Centre for Pancreatic Cancer, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - George Zogopoulos
- 1Rosalind and Morris Goodman Cancer Research Centre of McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- 2Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Manchanda R, Lieberman S, Gaba F, Lahad A, Levy-Lahad E. Population Screening for Inherited Predisposition to Breast and Ovarian Cancer. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 2020; 21:373-412. [DOI: 10.1146/annurev-genom-083118-015253] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
The discovery of genes underlying inherited predisposition to breast and ovarian cancer has revolutionized the ability to identify women at high risk for these diseases before they become affected. Women who are carriers of deleterious variants in these genes can undertake surveillance and prevention measures that have been shown to reduce morbidity and mortality. However, under current strategies, the vast majority of women carriers remain undetected until they become affected. In this review, we show that universal testing, particularly of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, fulfills classical disease screening criteria. This is especially true for BRCA1 and BRCA2 in Ashkenazi Jews but is translatable to all populations and may include additional genes. Utilizing genetic information for large-scale precision prevention requires a paradigmatic shift in health-care delivery. To address this need, we propose a direct-to-patient model, which is increasingly pertinent for fulfilling the promise of utilizing personal genomic information for disease prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ranjit Manchanda
- Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London EC1M 6BQ, United Kingdom;,
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London E1 1FR, United Kingdom
| | - Sari Lieberman
- Medical Genetics Institute, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem 9103102, Israel;,
- Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 9112102, Israel
| | - Faiza Gaba
- Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London EC1M 6BQ, United Kingdom;,
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London E1 1FR, United Kingdom
| | - Amnon Lahad
- Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 9112102, Israel
- Clalit Health Services, Jerusalem 9548323, Israel
| | - Ephrat Levy-Lahad
- Medical Genetics Institute, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem 9103102, Israel;,
- Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 9112102, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Fazio N. Cisplatin Plus Gemcitabine as Standard of Care for Germline BRCA/PALB2-Mutated Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Are We Moving Too Fast? J Clin Oncol 2020; 38:2466-2467. [PMID: 32407212 DOI: 10.1200/jco.20.00419] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola Fazio
- Nicola Fazio, MD, PhD, Division of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology and Neuroendocrine Tumors, European Institute of Oncology, IEO, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Garnier J, Ewald J, Marchese U, Gilabert M, Launay S, Moureau-Zabotto L, Poizat F, Giovannini M, Delpero JR, Turrini O. Outcomes of patients with initially locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma who did not benefit from resection: a prospective cohort study. BMC Cancer 2020; 20:203. [PMID: 32164564 PMCID: PMC7068994 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-6690-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2019] [Accepted: 02/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The current study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of patients with unresectable non-metastatic locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (LAPA) who did not benefit from resection considering the treatment strategy in the clinical settings. METHODS Between 2010 and 2017, a total of 234 patients underwent induction chemotherapy for LAPA that could not be treated with surgery. After oncologic restaging, continuous chemotherapy or chemoradiation (CRT) was decided for patients without metastatic disease. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to determine overall survival (OS), and the Wilcoxon test to compare survival curves. Multivariate analysis was performed using the stepwise logistic regression method. RESULTS FOLFIRINOX was the most common induction regimen (168 patients, 72%), with a median of 6 chemotherapy cycles and resulted in higher OS, compared to gemcitabine (19 vs. 16 months, hazard ratio (HR) = 1.2, 95% confidence interval: 0.86-1.6, P = .03). However, no difference was observed after adjusting for age (≤75 years) and performance status score (0-1). At restaging, 187 patients (80%) had non-metastatic disease: CRT was administered to 126 patients (67%) while chemotherapy was continued in 61 (33%). Patients who received CRT had characteristics comparable to those who continued with chemotherapy, with similar OS. They also had longer progression-free survival (median 13.3 vs. 9.6 months, HR = 1.38, 95% confidence interval: 1-1.9, P < .01) and limited short-term treatment-related toxicity. CONCLUSIONS The median survival of patients who could not undergo surgery was 19 months. Hence, CRT should not be eliminated as a treatment option and may be useful as a part of optimised sequential chemotherapy for both local and metastatic disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Garnier
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France.
| | - Jacques Ewald
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - Ugo Marchese
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - Marine Gilabert
- Department of Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - Simon Launay
- Department of Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | | | - Flora Poizat
- Department of Pathology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - Marc Giovannini
- Department of Endoscopy, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - Jean-Robert Delpero
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - Olivier Turrini
- Department of Surgery, Aix-Marseille University, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, CRCM, Marseille, France
| |
Collapse
|