Surgical robotics

Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a propensity score matched analysis

Background

Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) was shown to be effective in reducing the morbidity and was adopted increasingly. The robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) remains in the initial stage of application. This study evaluated its safety and feasibility by comparing short-term outcomes of RAMIE and video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (VAMIE).

Methods

Between March 2016 and December 2017, 115 consecutive patients underwent RAMIE or VAMIE at our institute. The baseline characteristics, pathological data and short-term outcomes of these two group patients were collected and compared. RAMIE patients were propensity score matched with VAMIE patients for a more accurate comparison.

Results

Matching based on propensity scores produced 27 patients in each group. After propensity score matching (PSM), the baseline characteristics between the two groups were comparable. The operation time in RAMIE group was significantly longer than that in VAMIE group (349 and 294 min, respectively; P < 0.001). The blood loss volume in RAMIE group was less than that in VAMIE group (119 and 158 ml, respectively), but with no statistically significant difference (P = 0.062). There was no significant difference between the two groups with respect to the mean number of dissected lymph nodes (20 and 19, respectively; P = 0.420), postoperative hospital stay (13.8 and 12.7 days, respectively; P = 0.548), the rate of overall complications (37.0 and 33.3%, respectively; P = 0.776) and the rates of detailed complications between the two groups.

Conclusions

The short-term outcomes of RAMIE is comparable to VAMIE, demonstrating safety and feasibility of RAMIE.

Resident training in a new robotic thoracic surgery program

BACKGROUND

The volume of robot-assisted operations has drastically increased over the past decade. New programs have focused on training surgeons, whereas resident training has lagged behind. The objective of this study was to evaluate our institutional experience with resident participation in thoracic robotic surgery cases since the initiation of our program.

METHODS

The first 100 robotic thoracic surgery cases at our institution were retrospectively reviewed and categorized into three sequential cohorts. Procedure type, patient and operative characteristics, level of resident participation (primary surgeon [PS] or assistant), and postoperative variables were evaluated.

RESULTS

Of the first 100 cases, 38% were lung resections, 23% were esophageal operations, and 20% were sympathectomies. The distribution of cases changed over time with the proportion of pulmonary resections significantly increasing. Patient age (P < 0.05), body mass index (P = not significant [NS]), and comorbidities (P = NS) increased over time. Resident participation as PS increased from 33%-59% between the early and late cohorts (P < 0.05). A subset analysis of the 20 lobectomies (7 attending PS, 13 residents) showed similar patient characteristics (P = NS): age (67 versus 69), body mass index (29.5 versus 26.1), and American Society of Anesthesiologists category (2.8 versus 2.8). Operative and postoperative characteristics were also similar (P = NS) regardless of PS: operative time (260 versus 249 min), estimated blood loss (187 versus 203 mL), and length of stay (4.8 versus 4.7 d).

CONCLUSIONS

Residents can participate as the PS in a variety of thoracic operations during the implementation of a robotics program. Operative time, estimated blood loss, and length of stay were similar regardless of level of resident participation.

Robotic transthoracic esophagectomy

BACKGROUND

We have initially published our experience with the robotic transthoracic esophagectomy in 32 patients from a single institute. The present paper is the extension of our experience with robotic system and to best of our knowledge this represents the largest series of robotic transthoracic esophagectomy worldwide. The objective of this study was to investigate the feasibility of the robotic transthoracic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in a series of patients from a single institute.

METHODS

A retrospective review of medical records was conducted for 83 esophageal cancer patients who underwent robotic esophagectomy at our institute from December 2009 to December 2012. All patients underwent a thorough clinical examination and pre-operative investigations. All patients underwent robotic esophageal mobilization. En-bloc dissection with lymphadenectomy was performed in all cases with preservation of Azygous vein. Relevant data were gathered from medical records.

RESULTS

The study population comprised of 50 men and 33 women with mean age of 59.18 years. The mean operative time was 204.94 mins (range 180 to 300). The mean blood loss was 86.75 ml (range 50 to 200). The mean number of lymph node yield was 18. 36 (range 13 to 24). None of the patient required conversion. The mean ICU stay and hospital stay was 1 day (range 1 to 3) and 10.37 days (range 10 to 13), respectively. A total of 16 (19.28%) complication were reported in these patents. Commonly reported complication included dysphagia, pleural effusion and anastomotic leak. No treatment related mortality was observed. After a median follow-up period of 10 months, 66 patients (79.52%) survived with disease free stage.

CONCLUSIONS

We found robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy feasible in cases of esophageal cancer. The procedure allowed precise en-bloc dissection with lymphadenectomy in mediastinum with reduced operative time, blood loss and complications.

Perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: a multi-institutional series

OBJECTIVE

To review a multi-institutional series of robot-assisted nephroureterectomy (RANU) for management of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UUTUC) with respect to technique and perioperative outcomes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between May 2007 and July 2011, 43 RANU were performed at three institutions for UUTUC with review of perioperative outcomes. A three- or four-armed robotic technique was used in all cases based on surgeon preference and the entirety of all procedures was performed using the robot-assisted technique. Single and two robot-docking techniques are described.

RESULTS

The mean (range) operating time was 247 (128-390) min, blood loss was 131 (10-500) mL and the median (range) length of stay was 3 (2-87) days. Pathology was pTa in nine patients, pT1 in 14 patients, pT2 in three patients, pT3 in 15 patients and pT4 in two patients. Lymph node dissection was performed in 22 patients (51%) with a mean (range) lymph node count of 11 (4-23). There were six postoperative complications: bleeding requiring a blood transfusion (grade II), splenic bleeding (grade IV), two cases of pneumonia (grade II) and two cases of rhabdomyolysis (grades II and IV). Nine recurrences (six bladder, two within the retroperitoneum and one in the contralateral collecting system) have been found to date on routine surveillance with a mean follow-up of 9 months.

CONCLUSIONS

RANU is a feasible alternative to laparoscopic and open techniques. Particular steps of the operation including sutured closure of the cystotomy and regional lymphadenectomy are facilitated with the use of robot-assisted surgery. Long-term outcomes are necessary to assess the relative efficacy of these approaches to more established techniques; however, early perioperative outcomes appear promising.

IS HAPTIC FEEDBACK NECESSARY TO MICROSURGICAL SUTURING? COMPARATIVE STUDY OF 9/0 AND 10/0 KNOT TYING OPERATED BY 24 SURGEONS

Robotically assisted telemanipulators are often criticised for their lack of direct haptic feedback. However, robotically assisted microsurgical sutures have already been achieved successfully. The aim of this study was to demonstrate that haptic feedback is not necessary in microsurgery.

Our series included 24 surgeons of whom 14 were micro-surgeons. Each of them had to tighten a 9/0 and a 10/0 pre-tied nylon thread until getting the sensation of optimal knot tying. The procedure was performed four times, with open and closed eyes. The quality of knot tying was evaluated (fully tied, fairly or incompletely tied, or broken thread).

The results obtained with the eyes open were significantly better. Neither the material size, nor the surgeon's expertise was shown to have an impact on knot tying quality.

Our results demonstrate the uselessness of haptic feedback in microsurgery.

Robotic Fourth-Arm Enucleation of an Esophageal Leiomyoma and Review of Literature

Esophageal leiomyomas are resected in symptomatic and/or malignancy-suspicious cases. Traditionally, they have been removed by laparotomy or thoracotomy and more recently by thoracoscopy and laparoscopy. Mucosal injury is reported as high as 7% of cases but may be higher in unreported general practice. Robotic technology seems to offer advantages. We describe a robotic approach that seems to minimize mobilization of the esophagus, potentially decreasing the likelihood of mucosal injury and postoperative recovery time. We review the literature to evaluate the reports of mucosal injury with the open, minimally invasive, and robotic techniques and describe our own method. To improve efficiency, we use a four-arm technique.

Combined robot-assisted laparoscopic nephroureterectomy and radical prostatectomy

A 57-year-old man with prostate cancer and transitional-cell carcinoma of the kidney underwent a combined robot-assisted prostatectomy and hand-assisted laparoscopic nephroureterectomy with robot assistance. We describe the initial report of this combined operation and the novel use of the da Vinci robot for extravesical bladder-cuff excision and repair.

The analysis of intraoperative neurosurgical instrument movement using a navigation log-file

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to define the technical requirements of future (tele)robotic neurosurgical systems. We aimed to analyse the movements of surgical instruments during neurosurgical procedures.

METHODS

A commercially available neuronavigation system (StealthStation TREON(plus), Medtronic, USA) was used to determine the position and orientation of the surgical instrument. A custom-made log-mode was implemented in the software to file instrument coordinates intraoperatively. Data was collected during the debulking of malignant primary brain tumours, temporal epilepsy surgery and skull base tumour surgery.

RESULTS

Maximum tip displacement velocity varied, per procedure, in the range 6.6-12.7 cm/s and maximum rotational speed 21-40 degrees/s. Maximum instrument orientation differences within the volume of movement varied. The largest differences were detected during temporal epilepsy surgery (73 degrees and 52 degrees in the coronal and axial planes, respectively), while the smallest differences were detected in the debulking of an intraventricular tumour.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we have demonstrated the feasibility of motion analysis in image-guided neurosurgery. To mimic ordinary open neurosurgery, future neurosurgical (tele)robotic systems should at least support translational speeds up to 12.7 cm/s, rotational speeds up to 40 degrees/s and differences in instrument orientation of up to 73 degrees.

Virtual reality technology and surgical training--a survey of general surgeons in Ireland

BACKGROUND

Virtual Reality Technology (VRT) is a validated method of training in industry but only recently has found a place in the postgraduate surgical curriculum.

AIMS

We surveyed 143 Irish consultant surgeons to ascertain their opinions on this topical issue.

METHODS

The survey consisted of 22 questions to which the consultants were asked to respond by choosing from a 5-point Likert scale.

RESULTS

Sixty-five per cent responded. A majority of 72% had seen VRT but only 47% had 'hands on' experience. Forty-six per cent believed that they were poorly informed regarding available technologies. As consultants became more informed about VRT significant differences were seen with regard to attitudes regarding the role of VR in skills in surgical training (p<0.05) and in the ability to define teaching objectives (p<0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

Our survey suggests that the underuse of the current offerings is not due to a perceived lack of interest on the part of the surgical trainers. Suppliers of these programmes have a responsibility to adequately educate and collaborate with all parties involved to improve overall benefit from these simulators.