1
|
Fiori KP, Levano S, Haughton J, Whiskey-LaLanne R, Telzak A, Muleta H, Vani K, Chambers EC, Racine A. Advancing social care integration in health systems with community health workers: an implementation evaluation based in Bronx, New York. BMC PRIMARY CARE 2024; 25:140. [PMID: 38678171 PMCID: PMC11055265 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-024-02376-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2024] [Accepted: 04/09/2024] [Indexed: 04/29/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In recent years, health systems have expanded the focus on health equity to include health-related social needs (HRSNs) screening. Community health workers (CHWs) are positioned to address HRSNs by serving as linkages between health systems, social services, and the community. This study describes a health system's 12-month experience integrating CHWs to navigate HRSNs among primary care patients in Bronx County, NY. METHODS We organized process and outcome measures using the RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance) implementation framework domains to evaluate a CHW intervention of the Community Health Worker Institute (CHWI). We used descriptive and inferential statistics to assess RE-AIM outcomes and socio-demographic characteristics of patients who self-reported at least 1 HRSN and were referred to and contacted by CHWs between October 2022 and September 2023. RESULTS There were 4,420 patients who self-reported HRSNs in the standardized screening tool between October 2022 and September 2023. Of these patients, 1,245 were referred to a CHW who completed the first outreach attempt during the study period. An additional 1,559 patients self-reported HRSNs directly to a clinician or CHW without being screened and were referred to and contacted by a CHW. Of the 2,804 total patients referred, 1,939 (69.2%) were successfully contacted and consented to work with a CHW for HRSN navigation. Overall, 78.1% (n = 1,515) of patients reported receiving social services. Adoption of the CHW clinician champion varied by clinical team (median 22.2%; IQR 13.3-39.0%); however, there was no difference in referral rates between those with and without a clinician champion (p = 0.50). Implementation of CHW referrals via an electronic referral order appeared successful (73.2%) and timely (median 11 days; IQR 2-26 days) compared to standard CHWI practices. Median annual cost per household per CHW for the intervention was determined to be $184.02 (IQR $134.72 - $202.12). CONCLUSIONS We observed a significant proportion of patients reporting successful receipt of social services following engagement with an integrated CHW model. There are additional implementation factors that require further inquiry and research to understand barriers and enabling factors to integrate CHWs within clinical teams.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin P Fiori
- Department of Pediatrics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Avenue, Bronx, NY, 10461, USA.
- Department of Family and Social Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Avenue, Bronx, NY, 10461, USA.
| | - Samantha Levano
- Department of Pediatrics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Avenue, Bronx, NY, 10461, USA
- Department of Family and Social Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Avenue, Bronx, NY, 10461, USA
| | - Jessica Haughton
- Department of Pediatrics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Avenue, Bronx, NY, 10461, USA
- Department of Family and Social Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Avenue, Bronx, NY, 10461, USA
| | - Renee Whiskey-LaLanne
- Department of Pediatrics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Avenue, Bronx, NY, 10461, USA
- Department of Family and Social Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Avenue, Bronx, NY, 10461, USA
| | - Andrew Telzak
- Department of Pediatrics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Avenue, Bronx, NY, 10461, USA
- Department of Family and Social Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Avenue, Bronx, NY, 10461, USA
| | - Hemen Muleta
- Department of Pediatrics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Avenue, Bronx, NY, 10461, USA
| | - Kavita Vani
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Women's Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Avenue, Bronx, NY, 10461, USA
| | - Earle C Chambers
- Department of Family and Social Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Avenue, Bronx, NY, 10461, USA
| | - Andrew Racine
- Department of Pediatrics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Avenue, Bronx, NY, 10461, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ren AZ, Sung V. Factors that influence health service access in deaf and hard-of-hearing children: a narrative review. Int J Audiol 2024; 63:171-181. [PMID: 37335176 DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2023.2223357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2022] [Revised: 05/31/2023] [Accepted: 06/05/2023] [Indexed: 06/21/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Early diagnosis and intervention of deaf and hard-of-hearing (DHH) children leads to improved language and psychosocial outcomes. However, many child, parent and provider related factors can influence access to early intervention services, including hearing devices. This narrative review aims to explore factors that influence health service access in DHH children. DESIGN A systematic search was conducted to identify articles that explored factors that influenced health service access in DHH children in countries with Universal Newborn Hearing Screening, published between 2010 and 2022. STUDY SAMPLES Fifty-nine articles met the inclusion criteria for data extraction. This included 4 systematic reviews, 2 reviews, 39 quantitative and 5 mixed methods studies and 9 qualitative studies. RESULTS The identified factors were grouped into the following themes: (a) demographic factors, (b) family related factors, (c) child related factors, (d) factors specific to hearing devices, (e) service delivery, f) telehealth and (g) COVID-19. CONCLUSION This review provided a comprehensive summary of multiple factors that affect access to health services in DHH children. Psychosocial support, consistent clinical advice, allocation of resources to rural communities and use of telehealth are possible ways to address barriers and improve health service access.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela Z Ren
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Valerie Sung
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Population Health, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Centre for Community Child Health, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cwalina TB, Xu JR, Pham J, Jella TK, Otteson T. Measuring food insecurity among a national sample of children with recurrent acute otitis media. Am J Otolaryngol 2024; 45:104186. [PMID: 38101136 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2023.104186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2023] [Accepted: 12/07/2023] [Indexed: 12/17/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Acute otitis media is one of the most common reasons for pediatric medical visits in the United States. Additionally, past studies have linked food insecurity and malnutrition with increased infections and worse health outcomes. However, there is a lack of information on the risk factors for food insecurity in specific patient populations, including the pediatric recurrent acute otitis media (RAOM) population. METHODS The 2011 to 2018 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) datasets were used to obtain a national estimate of the presentation of food insecurity within pediatric patients with RAOM. Relevant sociodemographic information and prevalence were identified. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to determine sociodemographic risk factors. Calculations were conducted using R with the "survey" package to account for the clustering and sampling of the NHIS. RESULTS Of 3844 children with RAOM who responded to the food insecurity module, 20.8 % (19.0-22.6 %) were food insecure. Age, race/ethnicity, percentage of federal poverty level status, insurance status, and self-reported health status were significant and were not independent of food insecurity status. Using multivariable regression, this study found the following sociodemographic risk factors: age 6-10 and age > 10 (reference: age 0-2); Black (reference: Non-Hispanic White); 100 % to 200 % and <100 % federal poverty level (reference: >200 % federal poverty level); public insurance or uninsured status (reference: private insurance); and poor to fair self-reported health status (reference: good to excellent). DISCUSSION Children with RAOM who were older, Black, less insured, living in lower-income households, and of poorer health had a greater association with being food insecure. Due to the frequency of RAOM pediatric visits, identifying at-risk groups as well as incorporating food insecurity screening and food referral programs within clinical practice can enable otolaryngologists to reduce disparities and improve outcomes in a targeted approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas B Cwalina
- Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, United States of America; University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Department of Otolaryngology, Cleveland, OH, United States of America
| | - James R Xu
- Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, United States of America; University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Department of Otolaryngology, Cleveland, OH, United States of America.
| | - Jessica Pham
- Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, United States of America; University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Department of Otolaryngology, Cleveland, OH, United States of America
| | - Tarun K Jella
- Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, United States of America; University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Department of Otolaryngology, Cleveland, OH, United States of America
| | - Todd Otteson
- Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, United States of America; University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Department of Otolaryngology, Cleveland, OH, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Leong S, Medina K, Peretz PJ, Olmeda-Jenkins MI, Oliver MA, Kuhlmey M, Bernstein SA, Ferrer F, Matiz LA, Lalwani AK. Community Health Worker Intervention for Newborns Not Passing Initial Universal Hearing Screening. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2024; 133:129-135. [PMID: 37583099 DOI: 10.1177/00034894231191314] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Universal newborn hearing screening (UNHS) is effective in identifying newborns with possible hearing loss (HL). Outpatient follow-up for newborns referred after hospital-based screening remains a potential area of improvement. In this study, we evaluate the efficacy of a community health worker (CHW) intervention in promoting adherence to outpatient rescreening for newborns referred after initial UNHS. METHODS A mixed prospective-retrospective cohort study was performed to evaluate a CHW intervention at an academic medical center. Caregivers of referred newborns were contacted by CHWs prior to discharge and educated about HL and the importance of follow-up screening. The CHW outreach intervention was performed for 297 referred newborns between May 2020 and June 2021 and compared to a cohort of 238 newborns without the CHW intervention between March 2019 and June 2021. Statistical analyses were conducted using 2 × 2 Chi-square tests, two-tailed unpaired t-tests, multinomial logistic regression, and multiple linear regression. RESULTS In the intervention group, 236 of 297 newborns (79.5%) completed their outpatient follow-up rescreening; in the comparison group, 170 of 238 newborns (71.4%) completed their follow-up rescreening (P = .031, OR = 1.55 with regression P = .04). In the intervention group, the average time to follow-up was 13.4 days versus 12.5 days for the comparison group (P = .449, multiple R2 = .02 with P = .78). CONCLUSIONS CHW outreach intervention may increase adherence to outpatient follow-up rescreening for newborns referred after initial, hospital-based UNHS. Expansion of nursery teams to include CHWs may thus improve completion of recommended follow-up hearing screens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen Leong
- Vagelos College of Physicians & Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kristy Medina
- Division of Community and Population Health, NewYork-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Patricia J Peretz
- Division of Community and Population Health, NewYork-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Maria I Olmeda-Jenkins
- Early Hearing Detection & Intervention, NewYork-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Melissa A Oliver
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, NewYork-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Megan Kuhlmey
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, NewYork-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Stacey A Bernstein
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, NewYork-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Fajah Ferrer
- Northern Manhattan Perinatal Partnership, New York, NY, USA
| | - Luz Adriana Matiz
- Division of Child and Adolescent Health, Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons and NewYork-Presbyterian, New York, NY, USA
| | - Anil K Lalwani
- Vagelos College of Physicians & Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, NewYork-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Anderst A, Hunter K, Andersen M, Walker N, Coombes J, Raman S, Moore M, Ryan L, Jersky M, Mackenzie A, Stephensen J, Williams C, Timbery L, Doyle K, Lingam R, Zwi K, Sheppard-Law S, Erskine C, Clapham K, Woolfenden S. Screening and social prescribing in healthcare and social services to address housing issues among children and families: a systematic review. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e054338. [PMID: 35487725 PMCID: PMC9058796 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Housing is a social determinant of health that impacts the health and well-being of children and families. Screening and referral to address social determinants of health in clinical and social service settings has been proposed to support families with housing problems. This study aims to identify housing screening questions asked of families in healthcare and social services, determine validated screening tools and extract information about recommendations for action after screening for housing issues. METHODS The electronic databases MEDLINE, PsycINFO, EMBASE, Ovid Emcare, Scopus and CINAHL were searched from 2009 to 2021. Inclusion criteria were peer-reviewed literature that included questions about housing being asked of children or young people aged 0-18 years and their families accessing any healthcare or social service. We extracted data on the housing questions asked, source of housing questions, validity and descriptions of actions to address housing issues. RESULTS Forty-nine peer-reviewed papers met the inclusion criteria. The housing questions in social screening tools vary widely. There are no standard housing-related questions that clinical and social service providers ask families. Fourteen screening tools were validated. An action was embedded as part of social screening activities in 27 of 42 studies. Actions for identified housing problems included provision of a community-based or clinic-based resource guide, and social prescribing included referral to a social worker, care coordinator or care navigation service, community health worker, social service agency, referral to a housing and child welfare demonstration project or provided intensive case management and wraparound services. CONCLUSION This review provides a catalogue of housing questions that can be asked of families in the clinical and/or social service setting, and potential subsequent actions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ania Anderst
- Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Program, The George Institute for Global Health, Newtown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kate Hunter
- Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Program, The George Institute for Global Health, Newtown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Melanie Andersen
- Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Program, The George Institute for Global Health, Newtown, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Natasha Walker
- Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Program, The George Institute for Global Health, Newtown, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Population Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Julieann Coombes
- Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Program, The George Institute for Global Health, Newtown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Shanti Raman
- Community Paediatrics, South Western Sydney Local Health District, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Melinda Moore
- Sydney Children's Hospitals Network (Randwick Campus), Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Lola Ryan
- Child, Youth and Family Services, Population and Community Health, South Eastern Sydney Local Health District, Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Michelle Jersky
- Sydney Children's Hospitals Network (Randwick Campus), Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Amy Mackenzie
- Sydney Children's Hospitals Network (Randwick Campus), Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jennifer Stephensen
- Sydney Children's Hospitals Network (Randwick Campus), Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Carina Williams
- Youth Health Services, Community Health, NSW Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Lee Timbery
- Sydney Children's Hospitals Network (Randwick Campus), Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kerrie Doyle
- School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Raghu Lingam
- Population Child Health Clinical Research Group, School of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Karen Zwi
- Sydney Children's Hospitals Network (Randwick Campus), Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Population Child Health Clinical Research Group, School of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Suzanne Sheppard-Law
- Faculty of Health, School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Technology Sydney, Broadway, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | - Kathleen Clapham
- Ngarruwan Ngadju First Peoples Health and Wellbeing Research Centre, Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Susan Woolfenden
- Population Child Health Clinical Research Group, School of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Community Paediatrics Research Group, Institute for Women, Children and Families, Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|