Substance use and misuse patterns and disability status in the 2020 US National Alcohol Survey: A contributing role for chronic pain

Quantification of racial and ethnic disparities in alcohol-related problems in light of different methodological approaches

AIM

We applied the Institute of Medicine (IOM) definition of racial and ethnic disparities in healthcare to estimate disparities in alcohol-related problems. This estimation involved adjusting for drinking patterns, gender and age, with observed disparities further explained by socioeconomic status (SES). We compared results of five statistical approaches which use different methods for adjusting covariates.

DESIGN AND SETTING

We conducted analysis of the repeated cross-sectional data from the US National Alcohol Surveys (NAS) from 2000 to 2020, comparing traditional regression, rank-and-replacement, propensity score weighting, G-computation and the double-robust methods.

PARTICIPANTS

39 239 respondents aged 18 + across five NAS surveys oversampling Black and Hispanic/Latino/a populations.

MEASUREMENTS

Our primary analysis examined the dichotomous outcomes of the three alcohol problem measures: occurrence of negative consequences, alcohol dependence (using DSM-IV criteria) and alcohol use disorder (AUD, using DSM-5 criteria). The drinking pattern variables encompassed past year total alcohol volume and measures of heavy drinking, including the number of days consuming 12+, 8-11 and 5-7 drinks.

FINDINGS

After adjusting for age, alcohol volume and heavy drinking days, statistically significantly higher prevalence of DSM-IV dependence and DSM-5 AUD were observed for Black and Hispanic men who drank in the past year compared with White men who drank. For instance, the Black-White difference in AUD prevalence ranged from 3.7% (95% confidence interval = 1.1%, 6.2%) to 4.9% (2.1%, 7.8%)-, while the HispanicWhite difference ranged from 2.3% (0.1%, 4.4%) to 3.4% (1.1%, 5.6%), using different adjustment methods. Further adjusting for SES factors only moderately explained the observed disparities. We found consistent results in the estimation of disparities across all five methods.

CONCLUSIONS

There appear to be racial and ethnic disparities in alcohol-related problems between Black and Hispanic men in the United States relative to White men after alcohol drinking patterns and age are adjusted. The findings also exhibit overall consistency across the five different methods or measurement applied.

Single and multiple tobacco product use among people with disabilities: Findings from the National Health Interview Survey, 2019-2022

INTRODUCTION

People with disabilities, approximately 25 % of the population, have a higher prevalence of smoking cigarettes and using various tobacco products; however, little is known about multiple tobacco product (MTP) use among this population. This study assessed patterns of MTP use among people with disabilities.

METHODS

Data from the 2019-2022 National Health Interview Study were analyzed to estimate the prevalence of single tobacco, MTP, and specific combinations of MTP (multiple combusted, combusted and non-combusted) use among adults with any disability and six disability domains (cognitive, communication, hearing, mobility, self-care, vision). Multinomial logistic regression models examined the association between MTP use and disability status.

RESULTS

People with any disability had higher odds of single tobacco product use (aOR = 1.35; 95 % CI 1.26, 1.45) and MTP use (aOR = 1.81; 95 % CI 1.57, 2.09) compared to those without any disability, which included multiple combusted use (aOR = 2.01; 95 % CI 1.62, 2.51) and multiple combusted/non-combusted use (aOR = 1.70; 95 % CI 1.43, 2.02). Higher odds of multiple combusted use were also found among those with cognitive, hearing, mobility, and vision disabilities and higher odds of multiple combusted/non-combusted use were found among those with cognitive and vision disabilities compared to those without the respective disability.

CONCLUSION

People with disabilities have higher odds of MTP use and therefore may be exposed to more toxicants and at risk for more severe nicotine dependence than those without a disability. Future research should investigate reasons for MTP use in this population and tailored cessation interventions may need to account for MTP use.

Recent advances in the treatment of chronic pain and substance use disorders

Among people with substance use disorders (SUDs), chronic pain is among the most common comorbid chronic health conditions. Chronic pain increases risk for poor SUD treatment outcomes, including risk for overdose. Given rising overdose rates across North America, a renewed research focus has emerged to better understand the contribution and treatment of chronic pain in the context of an SUD. A significant portion of this research has focused on behavioral interventions given their safety and efficacy in treating both conditions separately. Therefore, this article will describe the recent advances in the treatment of chronic pain and SUD, including promising care delivery models and behavioral treatments. Areas for further study will also be reviewed.

Perinatal mental health and risk of severe maternal morbidity in women with physical disabilities, Massachusetts 2003-2015

BACKGROUND

Perinatal mental health and substance use disorders contribute to adverse maternal outcomes. Women with disabilities experience increased risk for severe maternal morbidity (SMM). No studies have examined the association between perinatal mental health and SMM risk in women with physical disabilities.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the association between perinatal mental health and substance use disorders and SMM risk in women with physical disabilities.

METHODS

We analyzed delivery hospitalizations from 2003 to 2015 from the Massachusetts Pregnancy to Early Life Longitudinal (PELL) data system. We identified physical disability using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes. Perinatal mental health status was based on the presence of at least one emergency department visit, observational, or in-patient stay attributed to a mental health or substance use disorder anytime from gestation to delivery. We used modified Poisson regressions to obtain risk ratios (RR) for SMM in women with either a physical disability or no disability by perinatal mental health status. Non-disabled women with no perinatal mental health or substance use disorder visit served as the referent group.

RESULTS

Deliveries in women with no physical disability and a perinatal mental health visit were not associated with risk of SMM. Compared to the referent group, women with a physical disability and a perinatal mental health or substance use disorder visit had greater risk of both SMM (RR = 1.84, 95 % CI:1.32-2.56), and nontransfusion SMM (RR = 2.35 1.52, 3.64), after adjusting for demographic and socioeconomic characteristics.

CONCLUSIONS

Increased attention should be paid to perinatal mental health status in women with physical disabilities.

Prevalence and Correlates of Alcohol and Drug Harms to Others: Findings From the 2020 U.S. National Alcohol Survey

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to measure the prevalence and overlap of secondhand harms from other people's use of alcohol, cannabis, opioids, or other drugs and examine sociodemographic and other correlates of these secondhand harms.

METHOD

This cross-sectional analysis used data from 7,799 respondents (51.6% female; 12.9% Black, 15.6% Hispanic/Latiné; mean age = 47.6 years) in the 2020 U.S. National Alcohol Survey. Secondhand harms included family/marriage difficulties, traffic accidents, vandalism, physical harm, and financial difficulties. Weighted prevalence estimates provided nationally representative estimates of these harms. Logistic regression assessed associations between individual characteristics and secondhand harms.

RESULTS

Lifetime prevalence of secondhand harms from alcohol, cannabis, opioids, or other drugs was 34.2%, 5.5%, 7.6%, and 8.3%, respectively. There was substantial overlap among lifetime harms: Almost 30% of those reporting secondhand alcohol harms also reported secondhand drug harms. Significant correlates of secondhand substance harms included female sex (alcohol, other drugs); White (alcohol, opioids), American Indian/Alaska Native (opioids), and Black (cannabis) race/ethnicity; and separated/divorced/widowed marital status (opioids). Those reporting a family history of alcohol problems had significantly higher odds of reporting secondhand harms across substance types. Individuals who reported frequent cannabis use had higher odds of reporting secondhand alcohol and opioid harms compared to those with no cannabis use (aOR = 1.55; aOR = 2.38) but lower odds of reporting secondhand cannabis harms (aOR = 0.51).

CONCLUSIONS

Although less prevalent than secondhand alcohol harms, 14% of participants reported secondhand harms from someone else's drug use and frequently experienced secondhand harms attributed to multiple substances. Population-focused interventions are needed to reduce the total burden of alcohol and other drug use.

Vision Loss and Substance Misuse: A Systematic Review

Background: The number of people in the U.S. affected by sensory disabilities and/or substance use has continued to increase, but the relationship between them has yet to be fully understood. The purpose of this review is to assess the relationship between substance use and vision loss in the U.S. as described by current literature. Methods: A search of published literature was conducted across MEDLINE, APA PsycINFO, Web of Science, and EBSCO: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection, and CINAHL following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analysis (PRISMA) protocol. Risk of bias was assessed by the authors based on study design. U.S. based studies written in English between 2010 and 2022 that reported on vision loss and substance use were included. Results: In all, 21 articles were included (case reports 11, case series 1, cross-sectional 4, retrospective cohort 3, review 2) representing 89,132 patients. Nineteen studies found a positive association between vision loss and substance use, with 15 studies suggesting substance use was a risk factor for vision loss. One study reported on vision loss preceding substance use but was inconclusive. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that substance use may be a risk factor for vision loss, and we recommend that providers screen for vision loss in at risk patients to mitigate further disability. Further research is needed to assess the impact visual disabilities may have on substance use, and stronger evidence is needed to verify if substance use is truly a risk factor for vision loss.

Association of Disability Status and Type With Binge Drinking and Prescription Opioid Misuse Among Adults From a 3-State Sample

BACKGROUND

Research examining at-risk substance use by disability status is limited, with little investigation into differences by disability type. We investigated binge drinking and prescription opioid misuse among adults with and without disabilities, and by type of disability, to inform need for assessment and intervention within these populations.

METHODS

Secondary analyses of adults who completed the disability, alcohol, and prescription opioid misuse items in the 2018 Ohio, Florida, or Nebraska Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System surveys (n = 28 341), the only states that included prescription opioid misuse in 2018. Self-reported disability status (yes/no) relied on 6 standardized questions assessing difficulties with: vision, hearing, mobility, cognition, self-care, and independent living (dichotomous, nonmutually exclusive, for each disability). Logistic regression models estimated the association of disability status and type with (1) past 30-day binge drinking and (2) past-year prescription opioid misuse. Additional models were restricted to separate subsamples of adults who: (a) currently drink, (b) received a past-year prescription opioid, and (c) did not receive a past-year prescription opioid.

RESULTS

One-third reported at least one disability, with mobility (19.5%), cognitive (11.5%), and hearing (10.2%) disability being the most common. Disability status was associated with lower odds of binge drinking (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 0.74, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.68-0.80, P ≤ .01). However, among adults who currently drink, people with disabilities had higher odds of binge drinking (AOR = 1.11, 95% CI 1.01-1.22, P ≤ .05]. Disability was associated with higher odds of past-year prescription opioid misuse (AOR = 2.51, 95% CI 2.17-2.91, P ≤ .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Adults with disabilities had higher odds of prescription opioid misuse, and among adults who currently drink, higher odds for binge drinking were observed. The magnitude of the association between disability status and prescription opioid misuse was particularly concerning. Providers should be trained to screen and treat for substance use problems for people with disabilities.

Cancer risks related to intellectual disabilities: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

People with intellectual disabilities (ID) face barriers in cancer care contributing to poorer oncological outcomes. Yet, understanding cancer risks in the ID population remains incomplete.

AIM

To provide an overview of cancer incidence and cancer risk assessments in the entire ID population as well as within ID-related disorders.

METHODS

This systematic review examined cancer risk in the entire ID population and ID-related disorders. We systematically searched PubMed (MEDLINE) and EMBASE for literature from January 1, 2000 to July 15, 2022 using a search strategy combining terms related to cancer, incidence, and ID.

RESULTS

We found 55 articles assessing cancer risks in the ID population at large groups or in subgroups with ID-related syndromes, indicating that overall cancer risk in the ID population is lower or comparable with that of the general population, while specific disorders (e.g., Down's syndrome) and certain genetic mutations may elevate the risk for particular cancers.

DISCUSSION

The heterogeneity within the ID population challenges precise cancer risk assessment at the population level. Nonetheless, within certain subgroups, such as individuals with specific ID-related disorders or certain genetic mutations, a more distinct pattern of varying cancer risks compared to the general population becomes apparent.

CONCLUSION

More awareness, and personalized approach in cancer screening within the ID population is necessary.

A predictive model for depression in Chinese middle-aged and elderly people with physical disabilities

BACKGROUND

Middle-aged and older adults with physical disabilities exhibit more common and severe depressive symptoms than those without physical disabilities. Such symptoms can greatly affect the physical and mental health and life expectancy of middle-aged and older persons with disabilities.

METHOD

This study selected 2015 and 2018 data from the China Longitudinal Study of Health and Retirement. After analyzing the effect of age on depression, we used whether middle-aged and older adults with physical disabilities were depressed as the dependent variable and included a total of 24 predictor variables, including demographic factors, health behaviors, physical functioning and socialization, as independent variables. The data were randomly divided into training and validation sets on a 7:3 basis. LASSO regression analysis combined with binary logistic regression analysis was performed in the training set to screen the predictor variables of the model. Construct models in the training set and perform model evaluation, model visualization and internal validation. Perform external validation of the model in the validation set.

RESULT

A total of 1052 middle-aged and elderly persons with physical disabilities were included in this study, and the prevalence of depression in the elderly group > middle-aged group. Restricted triple spline indicated that age had different effects on depression in the middle-aged and elderly groups. LASSO regression analysis combined with binary logistic regression screened out Gender, Location of Residential Address, Shortsightedness, Hearing, Any possible helper in the future, Alcoholic in the Past Year, Difficulty with Using the Toilet, Difficulty with Preparing Hot Meals, and Unable to work due to disability constructed the Chinese Depression Prediction Model for Middle-aged and Older People with Physical Disabilities. The nomogram shows that living in a rural area, lack of assistance, difficulties with activities of daily living, alcohol abuse, visual and hearing impairments, unemployment and being female are risk factors for depression in middle-aged and older persons with physical disabilities. The area under the ROC curve for the model, internal validation and external validation were all greater than 0.70, the mean absolute error was less than 0.02, and the recall and precision were both greater than 0.65, indicating that the model performs well in terms of discriminability, accuracy and generalisation. The DCA curve and net gain curve of the model indicate that the model has high gain in predicting depression.

CONCLUSION

In this study, we showed that being female, living in rural areas, having poor vision and/or hearing, lack of assistance from others, drinking alcohol, having difficulty using the restroom and preparing food, and being unable to work due to a disability were risk factors for depression among middle-aged and older adults with physical disabilities. We developed a depression prediction model to assess the likelihood of depression in Chinese middle-aged and older adults with physical disabilities based on the above risk factors, so that early identification, intervention, and treatment can be provided to middle-aged and older adults with physical disabilities who are at high risk of developing depression.

Self-Reported Disability Type and Risk of Alcohol-Induced Death - A Longitudinal Study Using Nationally Representative Data

BACKGROUND

Disability is associated with alcohol misuse and drug overdose death, however, its association with alcohol-induced death remains understudied.

OBJECTIVE

To quantify the risk of alcohol-induced death among adults with different types of disabilities in a nationally representative longitudinal sample of US adults.

METHODS

Persons with disabilities were identified among participants ages 18 or older in the Mortality Disparities in American Communities (MDAC) study (n = 3,324,000). Baseline data were collected in 2008 and mortality outcomes were ascertained through 2019 using the National Death Index. Adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated for the association between disability type and alcohol-induced death, controlling for demographic and socioeconomic covariates.

RESULTS

During a maximum of 12 years of follow-up, 4000 alcohol-induced deaths occurred in the study population. In descending order, the following disability types displayed the greatest risk of alcohol-induced death (compared to adults without disability): complex activity limitation (aHR = 1.7; 95% CI = 1.3-2.3), vision limitation (aHR = 1.6; 95% CI = 1.2-2.0), mobility limitation (aHR = 1.4; 95% CI = 1.3-1.7), ≥2 limitations (aHR = 1.4; 95% CI = 1.3-1.6), cognitive limitation (aHR = 1.2; 95% CI = 1.0-1.4), and hearing limitation (aHR = 1.0; 95% CI = 0.9-1.3).

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of alcohol-induced death varies considerably by disability type. Efforts to prevent alcohol-induced deaths should be tailored to meet the needs of the highest-risk groups, including adults with complex activity (i.e., activities of daily living - "ALDs"), vision, mobility, and ≥2 limitations. Early diagnosis and treatment of alcohol use disorder within these populations, and improved access to educational and occupational opportunities, should be considered as prevention strategies for alcohol-induced deaths.

Psychological/behavioral interventions for emerging adults with chronic pain

Background

Emerging adults, of whom significant numbers report chronic pain, are characterized as having unique needs and challenges. Psychological/behavioral treatments found to be beneficial for reducing pain outcomes in children and adults are understudied in emerging adults. Following a systematic review of the literature, our objective is to report on quantitative studies of psychological/behavioral interventions for chronic pain in emerging adults.

Method

We conducted a search of six databases (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Google Scholar, ProQuest, PsycINFO, PubMed, and Web of Science) and reference sections in dissertations and systematic reviews to 4/29/2023. Keywords and phrases were search term combinations of "chronic/persistent pain", "emerging/young adults," and "intervention/treatment" using Boolean logic.

Results

Our review resulted in identifying 37 articles, of which 2 duplicates were removed, and 31 were further excluded by a screening process based on various inclusionary and exclusionary criteria. The search yielded four studies on psychological/behavioral interventions (yoga, acceptance and commitment therapy and relaxation), all of which positively affected the pain experience and/or pain-related outcomes. These studies presented issues in design such as not being blinded or randomized, having a small sample size, and potential confounds that were not reported or examined.

Discussion

The low number of studies reveals a large gap in the literature and is a call-to-action to further expand our understanding of effective and safer psychological/behavioral therapies for chronic pain in emerging adults. Successful pain management during this developmental phase may help young adults achieve positive trajectories for personal, occupational, relational, and health aspects of their lives.

Marijuana use disorder among adults with functional disabilities-A US population-based cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Recent studies suggest a growing trend in marijuana use, compared to a stable prevalence of marijuana use disorder among US adults over the first 15 years of the 21st century. This study investigated the recent patterns of marijuana use disorder among people with disabilities (PWD).

METHODS

We extracted a nationally representative sample (N = 209,058) from the 2015-2019 National Survey on Drug Use and Health data set and examined associations by functional disability status (any disability, disability by type, and number of disabling limitations) with marijuana use disorder using a series of independent multivariable logistic regression models. We also performed trend analyses during the study period.

RESULTS

The prevalence of marijuana use disorder (from 1.7% to 2.3%) increased significantly among PWD between 2015 and 2019 (p-trend < .001). PWD were significantly more likely to report marijuana use disorder (odds ratio [OR], 1.37, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.24-1.52) than people without disability (PWoD). Those with cognitive limitation only (OR, 1.78, 95% CI, 1.53-2.06) and ≥2 limitations (OR, 1.29, 95% CI, 1.10-1.51) were more likely to report marijuana use disorder than PWoD.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

PWD had a consistently higher prevalence of marijuana use disorder than PWoD. Additionally, the level of risk for marijuana use disorder varied by disability type and number of disabling limitations.

SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE

Our study provided new nuance on disparities in marijuana use disorder between PWD and PWoD and further revealed the varied risks for marijuana use disorder across different disability statuses.

Substance Use in U.S. Vietnam War Era Veterans and Nonveterans: Results from the Vietnam Era Health Retrospective Observational Study

Background: Substance use (SU) is associated with physical injury and mental health disorders in older persons, but recent research has scarcely examined SU in U.S. Vietnam-era veterans who are mostly in or near their eighth decade of life. Objectives: We compared the prevalence of self-reported lifetime and current SU and modeled current usage patterns in a nationally representative sample of veterans versus a matched nonveteran cohort. Methods: Cross-sectional, self-reported survey data were analyzed from the 2016-2017 Vietnam Era Health Retrospective Observational Study (VE-HEROeS) (n = 18,866 veterans, n = 4,530 nonveterans). We assessed lifetime and current alcohol and drug use disorders; lifetime and current use of cannabis, opioids, stimulants, sedatives, "other drugs" (psychedelics, prescription or over-the-counter drugs not prescribed/used as intended); and current SU patterns (alcohol-use-only, drug-use-only, dual-SU, no SU). Weighted descriptive, bivariable, and multivariable statistics were calculated. Covariates in multinomial modeling included sociodemographic characteristics, lifetime cigarette smoking, depression, potentially traumatic events (PTEs), and current pain (SF-8^TM). Results: Prevalence of lifetime opioid and sedative use (p ≤ .01), drug and alcohol use disorders (p < .001), and current "other drug" use (p < .001) were higher in veterans versus nonveterans. Current use of alcohol and cannabis was high in both cohorts. In veterans, very severe/severe pain, depression, and PTEs were highly associated with drug-use-only (p < .001) and dual-SU (p < .01), but these associations were fewer for nonveterans. Conclusion: This research confirmed existing concerns over substance misuse in older individuals. Vietnam-era veterans may be at particular risk due to service-related experiences and later-life tribulations. Era veterans' unique perceptions toward healthcare assistance for SU may need greater provider focus to maximize self-efficacy and treatment.

Drug and alcohol use disorders among adults with select disabilities: The national survey on drug use and health

BACKGROUND

Deaths caused by drugs and alcohol have reached high levels in the US, and prior research shows a consistent association between disability status and substance misuse.

OBJECTIVE

Using national data, this study quantifies the association between disability status and drug and alcohol use disorders among US adults.

METHODS

The most recent pre-pandemic years (2018-2019) of the cross-sectional National Survey on Drug Use and Health (n = 83,439) were used to examine how the presence of any disability, and specific disabilities, were associated with past year drug and alcohol use disorders. Logistic regression was used to estimate adjusted odds ratios (aORs) controlling for potential sociodemographic confounders.

RESULTS

Adults with any disability had increased odds of drug (aOR = 2.7; 95% CI = 2.5-3.0), and alcohol use disorder (aOR = 1.8; 95% CI = 1.6-2.0), compared to adults without disability. Examining specific types of disabilities, adults with cognitive limitations only had increased odds of drug (aOR = 3.1; 95% CI = 2.6-3.6), and alcohol use disorders (aOR = 2.2; 95% CI = 1.9-2.5), compared to adults without disability. Smaller associations were observed between vision and complex activity limitations and drug use disorder. Adults with two or more types of limitations had increased odds of drug (aOR = 3.7; 95% CI = 3.3-4.3), and alcohol use disorders (aOR = 2.3; 95% CI = 2.0-2.6).

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of disability, especially cognitive limitation only, or two or more types of limitations, is associated with elevated odds of drug and alcohol use disorder among US adults. Additional research should examine the temporal relationship between and mechanisms linking disability and substance misuse.

Predictors of alcohol screening quality in a US general population sample and subgroups of heavy drinkers

Alcohol screening is one of the most cost-effective clinical preventive services and important for intervening in the development of alcohol problems. We examine predictors of the quality of alcohol screening, approximated by alcohol quantity screening, which is a prerequisite for appropriate counseling, and compare conventional regression approach with Classification and Regression Trees (CART). Data come from the 2020 National Alcohol Survey, a population survey of US adults aged 18 years and over. Analyses focus on those reporting any alcohol screening at all (N = 989). The primary outcome was whether a healthcare profession had ever asked how much they drink, which is necessary to identify heavy drinking. We examined 12 potential predictors of alcohol quantity: gender, age, race and ethnicity, education, marital status, having a usual source of primary care, insurance, and health conditions. Analyses were replicated in heavy episodic drinking (HED) and high intensity drinking (HID) subgroups, both warranting alcohol counseling. Logistic regression results show that having diabetes and not having a college degree predict missed alcohol quantity screening in the sample overall, and younger age predicts missed alcohol quantity screening in the HED/HID subgroups. CART identified Black and Hispanic respondents who had not attended college at high risk of missed screening for heavy drinking in the overall sample, and those with public insurance at high risk of missed screening for heavy drinking in the HED/HID subgroups. The quality of alcohol screening needs improvement in general, and to avoid unintended disparities in alcohol-related health services.

Peer Support at the Intersection of Disability and Opioid (Mis)Use: Key Stakeholders Provide Essential Considerations

Individuals with disabilities may experience higher rates of opioid/substance use disorders (OUD/SUD) than other individuals and are likely vulnerable to unmet treatment needs. Peer support may be beneficial to these individuals, given the evidence of benefits in target populations with similar needs and the potential for overcoming barriers to treatment suggested in the available literature. The objective of this exploratory study was to specify essential considerations in adapting peer support for this population. Diverse key stakeholders (n = 16) were interviewed to explore the experiences, needs, and available supports for individuals with disabilities and OUD/SUD. A Peer Support Work Group including members with lived experience advised each component of the study. Semi-structured interview data were content analyzed and memos generated to summarize themes related to the research question. Participants reported extensive professional and personal experience in human services, disability, and recovery. Emergent themes included the importance of accessibility and model fit, the notion of "peerness" and peer match, and essential aspects of peer recruitment, training, and support. An accessible, acceptable, effective model of peer support requires particular attention to the needs of this diverse and varied population, and the contexts in which they are identified, referred, and engaged in services.

Cancer Disparities Experienced by People with Disabilities

People with disabilities, who represent a rapidly growing and seriously disadvantaged segment of the U.S. population, face unremitting barriers to equal and accessible healthcare and a high prevalence of chronic health conditions. A slowly growing body of research suggests multiple cancer-related disparities between people with and without disabilities. This commentary identifies multiple aspects of the cancer experience and highlights ways cancer is impacted by disability. This includes vulnerabilities to risk factors, barriers to accessing healthcare, and disparities in screening, diagnosis, and treatment. The authors offer six essential pathways for reducing cancer disparities faced by people with disabilities. It is clear that reducing cancer health disparities experienced by people with disabilities will require the commitment and cooperation of a wide range of stakeholders.

Longitudinal assessment of drinking changes during the pandemic: The 2021 COVID-19 follow-up study to the 2019 to 2020 National Alcohol Survey

Background

Surveys of changes in drinking during the COVID‐19 pandemic have primarily relied on retrospective self‐report. Further, most such surveys have not included detailed measures of alcohol use patterns, such as beverage‐specific consumption, nor measures of alcohol use disorder (AUD) symptoms that would allow a comprehensive understanding of changes in alcohol use.

Methods

Data from 1819 completed interviews from the N14C follow‐up survey to the 2019 to 2020 National Alcohol Survey (N14) were conducted between January 30 and March 28, 2021. Questions on alcohol use from the Graduated Frequency series, beverage‐specific quantity and frequency, and DSM‐5 AUD items were asked in both surveys and used to estimate changes from pre‐pandemic drinking to drinking during the pandemic. Analyses focus on changes in these measures over time and comparisons between key subgroups defined by gender, race/ethnicity, and age.

Results

Key findings include particularly large increases in drinking and AUD for African Americans and women, reduced drinking and heavy drinking prevalence among men and White respondents, and a concentration of increased drinking and AUD among respondents aged 35 to 49. Increases in alcohol use were found to be driven particularly by increases in drinking frequency and the consumption of spirits.

Conclusions

Results confirm prior findings of overall increases and subgroup‐specific changes, and importantly, provide detailed information on the patterns of change across major socio‐demographic subgroups. Substantial increases in the prevalence of DSM‐5 moderate to severe AUDs are a novel finding that is of particular concern.