Increased healing in diabetic toe ulcers in a multidisciplinary foot clinic-An observational cohort study

Diabetic foot in primary and tertiary (DEFINITE) care: An efficacious, synergistic and cost-effective multidisciplinary team model for diabetic foot care in Singapore

Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) and lower extremity amputations (LEAs) threaten survival and quality of life (QoL) of patients, contributing to healthcare and economic burden. Guidelines advocate for a multidisciplinary team (MDT) approach, but limited literature exists on cost-effectiveness and collaboration with primary care. We present the outcomes of the Diabetic Foot in Primary and Tertiary (DEFINITE) Care program, an MDT initiative in Singapore across primary and tertiary care. Patients with DFU from June 2020 to 2022 were enrolled. Clinical outcomes encompassed one-year minor and major LEAs, mortality and LEA-free survival rates. Healthcare utilization outcomes included number of admissions, length of stay, and primary care and hospital visits. QoL and Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) were respectively assessed using the EuroQol Five-Dimensional Questionnaire and Diabetic Foot Ulcer Scale-Short Form. Results from DEFINITE were propensity-score matched against a retrospective cohort. Cost-effectiveness analysis was performed using Markov simulation. Subgroup analyses focused on at-risk populations, including patients without access to MDT clinics or podiatry, appointment defaulters, octogenarians, patients with end-stage renal failure and different primary care locations. Total of 2,798 patients, with a mean age of 65.7 years and majority males (61.4%), were included for analysis. DEFINITE Care patients had higher minor LEA and improved LEA-free survival rates, fewer and shorter hospital admissions, and enhanced QoL and PROMs. DEFINITE Care demonstrated greater cost-effectiveness when compared to traditional care. Outcomes varied among subgroups. DEFINITE Care is an efficacious and cost-effective MDT model which fosters collaboration between primary and tertiary care for diabetic limb salvage.

Observations of teamworking in a multidisciplinary diabetic foot clinic: Bridging roles of podiatry and technology

Diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) is arguably the gravest complication of type 2 diabetes with high disease burden and mortality. Its complexity as a chronic disease with acute presentation necessitates rapid access to a multidisciplinary team (MDT), typically comprising vascular surgeons, endocrinologists and podiatrists. We conducted a focused ethnography of 55 (82.5 h) observations, 10 interviews with patients and several opportunistic in-situ conversations with patients and members of the care team at the multidisciplinary foot clinic of a tertiary public hospital in Singapore. In the clinic, the patient sat in the centre of the treatment room to be attended to by various members of the MDT who entered and exited the room singly, then collectively, to diagnose and recommend treatments. This led us to adopt a dramaturgical model as our theoretical framework to explore the movements and interactions composing what can be recognised as teamworking. The clinicians' teamworking could be organized into front-stage planned activities of history-taking and diagnosing and treating the foot wound; front-stage ad hoc activities of clinical deliberating and recommending; back-stage planned activities consisting of discussions on workups, interventions and appointments and coordinating these for performing teamwork in the front-stage; back-stage ad hoc activities such as interprofessional discussions away from the patient and outside the clinic; and off-stage activities in the patient's lifeworld pertaining to patients' everyday decisions and concerns. The protracted treatment work of the podiatrist places her in a bridging position between the patient and the medical members of the MDT that could plug knowledge gaps, and enrich clinical explanations and decision-making. Technology enabled backstage interaction and sustained teamwork outside the clinic even when decision-makers among the medical team members were not physically present. The occurrences from the patient's lifeworld pose an essential influence that can inform teamworking in the clinic. We discuss implications for practice.

Rapid Access From Primary Care to a Multidisciplinary Clinic at Tertiary Care Improves Clinical Outcomes for Patients With Diabetic Foot Ulcers: Results From Diabetic Foot in Primary and Tertiary (DEFINITE) Care's Lower Extremity Amputation Prevention Program (LEAPP) Clinic

Diabetic Foot in Primary and Tertiary (DEFINITE) Care is an inter-institutional, multidisciplinary team (MDT) program for patients with diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) within a healthcare cluster in Singapore. This is one of our subgroup analyses within DEFINITE Care, assessing clinical outcomes of lower extremity amputation prevention program (LEAPP), a multidisciplinary diabetic foot clinic, and non-LEAPP patients within the program. From June 2020 to June 2022, 2798 patients within the DEFINITE cohort completed a minimum of 12-month follow up. Of these patients, 20.6% were managed by LEAPP, whereas 79.4% were non-LEAPP patients. Patients in the LEAPP cohort were older with co-existing metabolic conditions and complications of diabetes. Using non-LEAPP cohort as the reference group and after adjusting for age, gender, ethnicity, comorbidities, and medications, there was a significantly lower risk of death (odds ratio [OR] 0.60, P = .001) and composite major lower extremity amputation (LEA) or death (OR 0.66, P = .002) among LEAPP patients at 1 year with longer mean days from enrollment to minor LEA, major LEA, and death. The adjusted 1-year healthcare utilization outcomes for LEAPP patients demonstrated an increase in inpatient admissions, primary care polyclinic visits, hospital specialist outpatient clinic (SOC) visits and elective day surgery procedures. Despite the increased in inpatients admissions, cumulative hospital length of stay in LEAPP patients were lower. This subgroup analysis has demonstrated that the MDT approach to caring for patients with DFU in tertiary centers not only improves mortality by 40%, but also delayed the incidence of minor LEA, major LEA, and death.

Multi-disciplinary diabetic limb salvage programme in octogenarians with diabetic foot ulcers is not futile: An observational study with historical controls

This study evaluated the effectiveness of a multi-disciplinary diabetic limb salvage programme in improving clinical outcomes and optimising healthcare utilisation in 406 patients aged ≥80 years with diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs), compared to 2392 younger patients enrolled from June 2020 to June 2021 and against 1716 historical controls using one-to-one propensity score matching. Results showed that elderly programme patients had lower odds of amputation-free survival (odds ratio: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.47, 0.88) and shorter cumulative length of stay (LOS) compared to younger programme patients (incidence rate ratio: 0.45, 95% CI: 0.29, 0.69). Compared to the matched controls, participating in the programme was associated with 5% higher probability of minor lower extremity amputation, reduced inpatient admissions and emergency visits, shorter LOS but increased specialist and primary care visits (all p-values <0.05). The findings suggest that the programme yielded favourable impacts on the clinical outcomes of patients aged≥80 years with DFUs. Further research is needed to develop specific interventions tailoring to the needs of the elderly population and to determine their effectiveness on patient outcomes while accounting for potential confounding factors.

Guideline for the Management of Diabetes Mellitus in the Elderly in China (2024 Edition)

With the deepening of aging in China, the prevalence of diabetes in older people has increased noticeably, and standardized diabetes management is critical for improving clinical outcomes of diabetes in older people. In 2021, the National Center of Gerontology, Chinese Society of Geriatrics, and Diabetes Professional Committee of Chinese Aging Well Association organized experts to write the first guideline for diabetes diagnosis and treatment in older people in China, the Guideline for the Management of Diabetes Mellitus in the Elderly in China (2021 Edition). The guideline emphasizes that older patients with diabetes are a highly heterogeneous group requiring comprehensive assessment and stratified and individualized management strategies. The guideline proposes simple treatments and de-intensified treatment strategies for older patients with diabetes. This edition of the guideline provides clinicians with practical and operable clinical guidance, thus greatly contributing to the comprehensive and full-cycle standardized management of older patients with diabetes in China and promoting the extensive development of clinical and basic research on diabetes in older people and related fields. In the past 3 years, evidence-based medicine for older patients with diabetes and related fields has further advanced, and new treatment concepts, drugs, and technologies have been developed. The guideline editorial committee promptly updated the first edition of the guideline and compiled the Guideline for the Management of Diabetes Mellitus in the Elderly in China (2024 Edition). More precise management paths for older patients with diabetes are proposed, for achieving continued standardization of the management of older Chinese patients with diabetes and improving their clinical outcomes.

Flexor Tendon Tenotomy Treatment of the Diabetic Foot: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of needle flexor tendon tenotomy treatment of the diabetic hammertoe deformity.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A multicenter randomized controlled trial of individuals with diabetes and ulcers or impending ulcers associated with hammertoes was performed between 1 November 2019 and 31 March 2021. Participants were stratified by the presence of ulcers or impending ulcers. Participants were randomly assigned to tenotomy and standard nonsurgical treatment or to standard nonsurgical treatment alone. Primary outcomes were time to ulcer healing and progression from impending ulcer to active ulcer.

RESULTS

Of 224 screened participants with diabetes, 95 (59.0% men) were included. The mean follow-up was 291 ± 70 days, 28 (29.5%) had type 1 diabetes, mean diabetes (presented with 25-75% quartile) duration was 20 (13-26) years, and mean age was 67.7 ± 9.8 years. Of the included participants, 16 had ulcers, of whom 8 were randomly assigned to intervention. Of the remaining 79 with impending ulcers, 39 were randomly assigned to intervention. For participants with ulcers, healing rates favored tenotomy (100% vs. 37.5%, P = 0.026) as did time to ulcer healing (P = 0.04). For those with impending ulcers, incidence of progression to an active ulcer was lower (1 vs. 7, P = 0.028) and the number of ulcer-free days higher (P = 0.043) in the tenotomy group. No serious adverse events were recorded.

CONCLUSIONS

This randomized study showed that the simple procedure of needle flexor tendon tenotomy was effective and safe when treating and preventing ulcers associated with the diabetic hammertoe deformity.

Novel topical allogeneic bone-marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cell treatment of hard-to-heal diabetic foot ulcers: a proof of concept study

Aim

The aim of this study was to investigate safety of treating diabetic foot ulcers with a topically administered mesenchymal stem cell product.

Method

Individuals with diabetes, peripheral neuropathy, toe blood pressure > 39 mmHg and non-infected foot ulcers with duration of four to fifty-two weeks were screened. Participants were treated with a one-time application of a topically applied allogeneic cellular product containing CD362 enriched mesenchymal stem cells suspended in a collagen solution. Participants were subsequently followed for seven months to gather information on adverse event and serious adverse events.

Results/discussion

A total of sixteen individuals were screened, of whom two were included. The included participants incurred a total of seven adverse events and one serious adverse event. Increased exudation from the treated diabetic foot ulcer was observed for both participants and a connection to investigational medicinal product was suspected. The increased exudation was resolved within one week after application of investigational medicinal product, without any further complications. The serious adverse event consisted of a hospital admission due to neurological symptoms, which were assumed to be caused by hypoglycemia, with no suspected correlation to the investigational medicinal product. None of the other observed adverse events were suspected to be associated with the investigational medicinal product.

Conclusion

This study presents data from two individuals with a diabetic foot ulcer treated with a novel topical mesenchymal stem cell product. An adverse event observed for both participants was suspected to be associated to the investigational medicinal product, i.e., increased exudation, which was resolved within one week, did not lead to further complications and can easily be remedied by choosing bandages with higher absorption capacity or increasing frequency of bandage changes. This study lays the groundwork for further large scale randomized clinical studies.

Trial registration: EudraCT number 2015-005580-16. Registered 12/06-2018.

Clinical and economic outcomes of a multidisciplinary team approach in a lower extremity amputation prevention programme for diabetic foot ulcer care in an Asian population: A case-control study

Present guidelines recommend a multidisciplinary team (MDT) approach to diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) care, but relevant data from Asia are lacking. We aim to evaluate the clinical and economic outcomes of an MDT approach in a lower extremity amputation prevention programme (LEAPP) for DFU care in an Asian population. We performed a case-control study of 84 patients with DFU between January 2017 and October 2017 (retrospective control) vs 117 patients with DFU between December 2017 and July 2018 (prospective LEAPP cohort). Comparing the clinical outcomes between the retrospective cohort and the LEAPP cohort, there was a significant decrease in mean time from referral to index clinic visit (38.6 vs 9.5 days, P < .001), increase in outpatient podiatry follow-up (33% vs 76%, P < .001), decrease in 1-year minor amputation rate (14% vs 3%, P = .007), and decrease in 1-year major amputation rate (9% vs 3%, P = .05). Simulation of cost avoidance demonstrated an annualised cost avoidance of USD $1.86m (SGD $2.5m) for patients within the LEAPP cohort. In conclusion, similar to the data from Western societies, an MDT approach in an Asian population, via a LEAPP for patients with DFU, demonstrated a significant reduction in minor and major amputation rates, with annualised cost avoidance of USD $1.86m.

Micro‐ and macrovascular complications and risk factors for foot ulceration and amputation in individuals receiving dialysis with and without diabetes

Introduction

This study examined the prevalence of microvascular and macrovascular complications in people receiving dialysis with and without diabetes and investigated independent risk factors for foot ulcers and lower‐extremity amputations.

Methods

We performed a cross‐sectional study of 119 individuals with diabetes and 219 individuals without diabetes receiving chronic dialysis during June 2019 at the Department of Nephrology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Denmark. Effects of diabetes and other risk factors were assessed by log‐binomial regression. Prevalence data were compared with a historical control group of 38 individuals with diabetes receiving dialysis examined in 2004 in the same department.

Results

We found that persons with diabetes had a twofold higher risk ratio of current (unadjusted risk ratio 2.2 [95% CI 1.1, 4.7]) and previous foot ulcer (2.5 [1.7, 3.7]) and a fourfold higher risk ratio of lower‐extremity amputation (4.2 [2.1, 8.6]) in comparison with persons without diabetes (all p < .05). Furthermore, persons with diabetes had a 70% increased risk ratio of myocardial infarction (1.7 [1.0–2.8], p = .041). In multivariable‐adjusted analysis, current foot ulcer was independently associated with previous foot ulcer (adjusted risk ratio 4.0 [95% CI 1.8, 8.9]), while lower‐extremity amputation was independently associated with diabetes (3.8 [1.8, 8.2]) and male sex (4.1 [1.5, 11.3]) (all p < .01).

Conclusions

Individuals with diabetes receiving dialysis had a higher prevalence of foot ulcer, lower‐extremity amputation and myocardial infarction compared to individuals without diabetes. Previous foot ulcer was the most important risk factor for current foot ulcer, while diabetes and male sex were important risk factors for lower‐extremity amputation.

Improved outcomes in patients with diabetic foot ulcers despite of differences in baseline characteristics

The incidence of diabetes is increasing worldwide with concomitant raising number of patients with diabetic foot disease. Diabetic foot disease treatment has received more attention in the past decades, culminating in the creation of multidisciplinary outpatient clinics, but at the same time, complexity of patients seems to have increased. The aim of this article is to study differences in patient characteristics and outcomes (ulcer healing and ulcer-free survival days) in patients with a diabetic foot ulcer in two prospective cohorts with 15 years in between. Prospective cohort study of all patients in one diabetic foot centre of expertise in 2003-2004 and 2014-2018. Clinical outcomes were determined after a follow-up period of 12 months. Outcomes were differences in baseline characteristics and comorbidities, and differences in ulcer-related outcomes between both cohorts. We included all consecutive diabetic foot ulcer patients from our centre for the period 2003-2004 (n = 79) and 2014-2018 (n = 271). Age (67.0 ± 14.3 vs. 71.6 ± 11.5, p = 0.003) and prevalence of end-stage renal disease (1.3% vs. 7.7%, p = 0.036) were significantly higher in the more recent population. The more recent population had higher healing rate (53.2% vs. 76.4%, p < 0.001), higher median ulcer-free survival days once an ulcer had healed [173 days (IQR 85.3-295.5) vs. 257.0 (IQR 157.0-318.0), p = 0.026], and fewer minor amputations (20.3% vs. 8.1%, p = 0.002). People with diabetic foot ulcers treated in 2014-2018 were older and more frequently diagnosed with ESRD, compared to this population in 2003-2004, while other characteristics were similar; ulcer-related outcomes were better.

The effects of felted foam in diabetic foot treatment: systematic review with meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effects of felted foam in the treatment of diabetic foot plantar ulcer.

METHOD

Systematic review with meta-analysis. Research was conducted in Cochrane Library, PubMed, CINAHL, Science Direct, Web of Science, SCOPUS, IBECS and LILACS. Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool was employed to evaluate risk of bias. The meta-analyses were calculated in the program Review Manager, while Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation was used for evaluating evidence quality.

RESULTS

Four clinical essays and two cohorts were included. Mean plantar pressure of individuals exposed to felt was reduced by 10.77 kilopascals (CI 95% -14.92, -6.62; p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Higher reduction of plantar pressure was observed to be associated with the use of felt. Development of new models of relief orthosis with felted foam for plantar pressure is recommended, along with more clinical research elucidating related outcomes.

Glycemic control and diabetic foot ulcer outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association between glycemic control (hemoglobin A1C, fasting glucose, and random glucose) and the outcomes of wound healing and lower extremity amputation (LEA) among patients with diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Scopus were searched for observational studies published up to March 2019. Five independent reviewers assessed in duplicate the eligibility of each study based on predefined eligibility criteria and two independent reviewers assessed risk of bias. Ameta-analysis was performed to calculate a pooled odds ratio (OR) or hazard ratio (HR) using random effects for glycemic measures in relation to the outcomes of wound healing and LEA. Subgroup analyses were conducted to explore potential source of heterogeneity between studies. The study protocol is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42018096842).

RESULTS

Of 4572 study records screened, 60 observational studies met the study eligibility criteria of which 47 studies had appropriate data for inclusion in one or more meta-analyses(n = 12,604 DFUs). For cohort studies comparing A1C >7.0 to 7.5% vs. lower A1C levels, the pooled OR for LEA was 2.04 (95% CI, 0.91, 4.57) and for studies comparing A1C ≥ 8% vs. <8%, the pooled OR for LEA was 4.80 (95% CI 2.83, 8.13). For cohort studies comparing fasting glucose ≥126 vs. <126 mg/dl, the pooled OR for LEA was 1.46 (95% CI, 1.02, 2.09). There was no association with A1C category and wound healing (OR or HR). There was high risk of bias with respect to comparability of cohorts as many studies did not adjust for potential confounders in the association between glycemic control and DFU outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that A1C levels ≥8% and fasting glucose levels ≥126 mg/dl are associated with increased likelihood of LEA in patients with DFUs. A purposively designed prospective study is needed to better understand the mechanisms underlying the association between hyperglycemia and LEA.

Current Wound Care Education in Entry-Level Doctor of Physical Therapy Curricula

OBJECTIVE

To investigate how wound care instruction is currently delivered within entry-level doctor of physical therapy (DPT) educational curricula.

METHODS

An electronic survey was distributed to 226 DPT programs in the US. The questionnaire contained 27 questions about the characteristics of the wound care instruction as well as the credentials, clinical experience, and teaching experience of the instructors. Descriptive statistics were analyzed for each questionnaire item response.

MAIN RESULTS

The response rate was 22.1% (n = 50). The majority of respondents reported 10 to 29 contact hours of wound care instruction throughout the curriculum. More than half of the programs reported that their students completed a wound care observation in clinical settings. Forty-four percent of programs stated that their students had the opportunity to participate in a clinical rotation focused solely on wound care. All respondents reported that their wound care instructors were physical therapists. Of those instructors, most were seasoned clinicians, and 46% held a wound care-related certification.

CONCLUSIONS

Current entry-level DPT curricula provide physical therapy students with adequate contact hours in wound care and the opportunity for clinical experiences. The instructors are seasoned physical therapists, and nearly half of them hold advanced certification in the content area. Further studies are warranted to investigate how physical therapists practice in wound management in various clinical settings.

The effect of needle tenotomy on hammer, mallet and claw toe deformities in patients with diabetes, a retrospective study

Aim

The aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes of needle tenotomies as a treatment option for hammer, mallet and claw toes in patients with diabetes.

Methods

This was a retrospective study where all patients receiving flexor tendon tenotomy by needle at our outpatient clinic were identified through the electronic patient record system.

Results

A total of 81 patients that had 106 tenotomy procedures performed were identified. The 81 included (68% male) had an average age of 65.4 years, and 27 (33%) had Type 1 diabetes. Of the 106 procedures 36 were performed due to an ulcer on the feet. Of the 36 treated ulcers, 34 (94%) healed in an average time of 28 days. Tenotomies performed to prevent impending ulcers from progressing to active ulcers, were performed 84 times in total. Of the 84 procedures 6 patients progressed to an active ulcer. No serious complications i.e. infections or amputations in relation to the procedure were registered.

Conclusion

Needle flexor tenotomies are a relatively safe and effective treatment compared to tenotomies done by scalpel, both as treatment for ulcers and to prevent formation of new ulcers associated with hammer, mallet and claw toe deformities. As a side note, transfer lesions are avoidable if all toes on one or both feet are tenotomized in one procedure.

Incidence and predictors of recurrent and other new diabetic foot ulcers: a retrospective cohort study

AIMS

To estimate progression rates, evaluate risk factors for progression, and study rate ratios for progression among people with a healed diabetic foot ulcer according to whether the healed ulcer was neuropathic, neuro-ischaemic or critically ischaemic.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study in all individuals with a healed diabetic foot ulcer treated at the Steno Diabetes Centre Copenhagen foot clinic in the period 2010 to 2016. The outcome of interest was recurrent/other new diabetic foot ulcers.

RESULTS

A total of 780 people had a healed diabetic foot ulcer in the study period (2010-2016). The participants were followed for 1249 person-years [median (Q1-Q3) 1.04 (0.38-2.46) person-years] in total. One-third (33.1%) developed a recurrent/other new diabetic foot ulcer per year. Male gender, people with Type 2 diabetes and smokers had a statistically significantly higher risk of progression to a recurrent/other new diabetic foot ulcer compared to participants without these risk factors. Participants with neuro-ischaemic or critically ischaemic diabetic foot ulcers had statistically significantly higher progression rates than participants with neuropathic diabetic foot ulcers.

CONCLUSIONS

Focus should be on preventing future recurrent/other new diabetic foot ulcers especially in people with ischaemia.

Standard complication screening information can be used for risk assessment for first time foot ulcer among patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes

AIM

Diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) is a major complication of both Type 1 Diabetes (T1D) and Type 2 Diabetes (T2D); however research into risk factors for DFU does not separate between these two types. The purpose of the present investigation was to identify risk factors for development of first time DFU (FTDFU) over a period of 15 years in patients with T1D and T2D separately.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included 25,220 feet from 5588 patients with T1D and 7113 patients with T2D treated in the period 2001-2015. Data on baseline characteristics and comorbidities were collected from electronic patient records. Influences of various risk factors for the development of FTDFU were assessed by hazard ratios (HR) from Cox proportional hazard regression models on time from enrolment to FTDFU diagnosis or end-of-follow-up.

RESULTS

In T1D independent risk factors were male sex, age >60 years, high HbA1c, long diabetes duration, history of cardiovascular disease, macro-albuminuria, decreased visual acuity, advanced diabetic retinopathy, decreased/absent vibration sense, presence of patient reported symptoms of neuropathy, and absence of foot pulses. In T2D the independent risk factors were the same except age >60 years, a history of cardiovascular disease, and long diabetes duration.

CONCLUSIONS

This study documents that much of the standard clinical information obtained as part of the routine follow-up are also independent risk factors for development of FTDFU. This may be used to create a basis for in which patient and when prevention should be started.

Decreasing incidence of foot ulcer among patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes in the period 2001-2014

AIM

Diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) is a serious complication to diabetes. The aim was to study the incidence of first DFU among patients with type 1 (T1DM) and type 2 diabetes (T2DM), stratified according to etiology: neuropathic, neuro-ischemic or ischemic, over a period of 14years (2001-2014).

METHODS

DFU incidence rates were calculated from electronic patient record data from patients with T1DM and complicated T2DM from a large specialized diabetes hospital with a multidisciplinary foot clinic in Denmark. Poisson regression was used to model incidence of first DFU according to calendar year, diabetes type and etiology.

RESULTS

Among 5640 patients with T1DM 255 developed a DFU, corresponding to an incidence of 5.8 (95% confidence interval (95%CI) 5.1-6.5) per 1000 patient years; this incidence dropped from 8.1 (95%CI 5.4-11.9) per 1000 patient years in 2002 to 2.6 (95%CI 1.3-5.3) in 2014 (p=0.0059). Among 6953 patients with T2DM 310 developed a DFU, corresponding to an incidence of 11.3 (95%CI 10.1-12.6) per 1000 patient years; this incidence dropped from 17.0 (95%CI 12.2-23.8) per 1000 patient years in 2002 to 8.7 (95%CI 5.3-14.1) per 1000 patient year (p=0.0260) in 2014.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of DFU has decreased substantially in T1DM as well as in T2DM. This change was driven by a decrease in incidence of neuropathic ulcers.

Building a Multidisciplinary Hospital-Based Wound Care Center: Nuts and Bolts

BACKGROUND

A hospital-based wound care center provides an important platform for the multidisciplinary approach to wound care. The colocation of specialists is an ideal working environment for the efficient delivery of quality care of the complex wound through daily communication and shared resources.

METHODS

We describe the critical components necessary in building a hospital-based wound care center. Furthermore, the experience at the authors' institution in developing the multidisciplinary approach is discussed.

RESULTS

Readily available ancillary services, specially trained personnel, continuum of care from the outpatient clinic to admission to surgery, and inpatient and outpatient post operative care all contribute to a process that is especially amenable to the care of the complex wound.

CONCLUSIONS

The final goal is to return the patient to the best quality of life achievable given his or her wound or disability. The aim of this study is to present the authors' experiences and provide insight for others who may want to build this model within their institutions.

Re-organizing inpatient care saves legs in patients with diabetic foot infections

AIMS

In this study, we evaluated the effects of the re-organization of inpatient care for patients with a diabetic foot infection, and the implementation of a specialized multi-disciplinary wound department at an academic tertiary hospital.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study, comprising 272 patients treated for diabetic foot infections in 2006-2007 (Group 1, n=124) and 2013-2014 (Group 2, n=148). In 2012, inpatient care of all chronic wounds was centralized at a single wound department with a multi-disciplinary team. We assessed group outcome before and after the re-organization.

RESULTS

During the 7-year study period, the incidence of hospitalized patients with a diabetic foot infection increased 19%. After initiating the re-organization, the below-the-knee amputation rate was significantly reduced (25.8% vs. 9.5%, p<0.001). The median time from admission to surgical intervention decreased from 5days to 2days, p<0.001. The length of hospitalization also tended to decrease after the reorganization.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this study demonstrate the benefits of treating diabetic foot infections at a specialized wound department with a multi-disciplinary team. The benefits were achieved by simply distributing the workload and organizing schedules, without new investments or additional personnel. The findings of this study indicate that patients with diabetic foot infections present a challenge that is beyond the expertise of a single field of medicine. A working collaboration between disciplines and a specialized wound department are central in achieving better results.