Persistence of newer anti-obesity medications in a real-world setting

Real-world persistence and adherence to glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists among obese commercially insured adults without diabetes

BACKGROUND

In 2014, the US Food and Drug Administration approved the first glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist product, liraglutide injection, for obesity treatment. Many GLP-1 obesity treatment clinical trials report significant weight loss and medication adherence at more than 85%. Little is known about the real-world GLP-1 obesity treatment adherence, persistence, and switch rates.

OBJECTIVE

To measure GLP-1 therapy persistence, adherence, and switch rates in a real-world cohort of members without diabetes using these drugs for obesity treatment.

METHODS

Integrated pharmacy and medical claims data from 16.5 million average monthly commercially insured membership were used to identify obese members without diabetes newly initiating GLP-1 therapy between January 1, 2021, and December 31, 2021. Members were required to be continuously enrolled 1-year before and after the GLP-1 therapy start date and aged 19 years of age or older. Persistence was measured as no greater than or equal to 60-day gap with allowance for GLP-1 switching. Adherence was measured as the proportion of days covered (PDC) and members with a PDC greater than or equal to 80% were considered adherent. GLP-1 product switching was also assessed descriptively.

RESULTS

4,066 commercially insured obese members without diabetes that newly initiated GLP-1 therapy met all study criteria. The mean age was 46 years, and 81% were female. Overall, GLP-1 persistence was 46.3% at 180 days and 32.3% at 1 year. The highest and lowest persistence rates at 1 year were observed for semaglutide (Ozempic) at 47.1% and liraglutide (Saxenda) 19.2%, respectively. Average PDC during the 1-year assessment was 51.0% with 27.2% adherent to therapy and 11.1% switched GLP-1 drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

This GLP-1 weight loss treatment real-world analysis, among obese individuals without diabetes, found poor 1-year persistence and adherence and low rates of switching between products. These findings will aid in assessing products cost-effectiveness, understanding obesity care management program needs, forecasting future GLP-1 use and cost trends, and negotiating GLP-1 pharmaceutical manufacturer value-based purchasing agreements.

Sex- and Gender-Related Differences in Obesity: From Pathophysiological Mechanisms to Clinical Implications

Obesity, primarily characterized by excessive fat accumulation, is a multifactorial chronic disease with an increasing global prevalence. Despite the well-documented epidemiology and significant advances in understanding its pathophysiology and clinical implications, the impact of sex is typically overlooked in obesity research. Worldwide, women have a higher likelihood to become obese compared to men. Although women are offered weight loss interventions more often and at earlier stages than men, they are more vulnerable to psychopathology. Men, on the other hand, are less likely to pursue weight loss intervention and are more susceptible to the metabolic implications of obesity. In this narrative review, we comprehensively explored sex- and gender-specific differences in the development of obesity, focusing on a variety of biological variables, such as body composition, fat distribution and energy partitioning, the impact of sex steroid hormones and gut microbiota diversity, chromosomal and genetic variables, and behavioural and sociocultural variables influencing obesity development in men and women. Sex differences in obesity-related comorbidities and varying effectiveness of different weight loss interventions are also extensively discussed.

Update on Endoscopic Treatments for Obesity

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Increased morbidity seen with rising obesity rates continues to place an unheralded burden on our health system. Lack of higher bariatric surgery utilization and limitations with lifestyle modification and pharmacotherapy highlights the need for additional therapies for obesity. Endoscopic bariatric and metabolic therapies (EBMT) are effective, safe treatments for obesity. Current FDA-approved EBMT are confined to gastric modalities while small bowel directed therapies are still considered investigational. This review highlights current modalities of EBMT.

RECENT FINDINGS

Many randomized controlled trials have been performed, including both open label and sham-controlled, which have demonstrated safety and efficacy of EBMT over lifestyle therapy alone. In addition, emerging evidence from clinical experience further supports EBMT for treatment of obesity. Current evidence supports the safety and efficacy of EBMT for obesity treatment in conjunction with lifestyle therapy. They can also be used concurrently with weight loss medications to increase total weight loss.

Adherence to liraglutide among individuals with overweight and obesity: Patient characteristics and clinical measures

AIM

To identify the sociodemographic, clinical and laboratory determinants relating to patient adherence to liraglutide treatment among individuals with overweight or obesity.

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed patients with overweight or obesity who were treated with liraglutide between 2019 and 2022. Over a 6-month follow-up period, measurements of body mass index, sociodemographic characteristics, clinical and laboratory data, and prescription records for liraglutide were collected. Treatment adherence was assessed using the proportion of days covered (PDC) measure, with a PDC ≥80% indicating high adherence.

RESULTS

The study population included 1890 participants (78.1% female, mean age 46 ± 12 years). At the end of the follow-up period, 84.9% of the participants exhibited low adherence to liraglutide treatment. Adherence to treatment improved with age (p = 0.04, odds ratio [OR] 1.013, confidence interval [CI] 1.001-1.025). Significant weight loss during treatment increased the likelihood of high adherence (p < 0.001, OR 1.251, CI 1.167-1.341). Individuals with a higher socioeconomic status displayed greater adherence (p = 0.023, OR 1.906, CI 1.091-3.328). Greater adherence was also seen in non-smokers (p = 0.047, OR 0.725, CI 0.528-0.996).

CONCLUSIONS

Only 15.1% of study participants exhibited high adherence to treatment (PDC ≥80%) after 6 months of follow-up. Further research is needed to explore approaches to enhance adherence to liraglutide, including strategies to educate and support patients in their efforts to achieve and maintain weight loss with the use of this drug.

Effectiveness and safety of drugs for obesity

Recent publicity around the use of new antiobesity medications (AOMs) has focused the attention of patients and healthcare providers on the role of pharmacotherapy in the treatment of obesity. Newer drug treatments have shown greater efficacy and safety compared with older drug treatments, yet access to these drug treatments is limited by providers' discomfort in prescribing, bias, and stigma around obesity, as well as by the lack of insurance coverage. Now more than ever, healthcare providers must be able to discuss the risks and benefits of the full range of antiobesity medications available to patients, and to incorporate both guideline based advice and emerging real world clinical evidence into daily clinical practice. The tremendous variability in response to antiobesity medications means that clinicians need to use a flexible approach that takes advantage of specific features of the antiobesity medication selected to provide the best option for individual patients. Future research is needed on how best to use available drug treatments in real world practice settings, the potential role of combination therapies, and the cost effectiveness of antiobesity medications. Several new drug treatments are being evaluated in ongoing clinical trials, suggesting that the future for pharmacotherapy of obesity is bright.

Long-term weight outcomes in patients treated with liraglutide 3.0 mg in real-world clinical practice

Long-term weight outcomes reflect the success of obesity treatment. Weight regain during treatment for obesity is a biologically maladaptive response that can be considered a central feature of the disease. This phenomenon has been well documented in patients treated with lifestyle changes and bariatric surgery. In patients treated with liraglutide 3.0 mg this has been documented in randomized control trials, but real-world analysis is lacking. The aim of this retrospective observational study was to explore the long-term weight outcomes in patients treated with liraglutide 3.0 mg in a real-world clinical practice. The association between body composition changes and weight outcomes was also explored. The study included 25 patients treated with multi-modal care that included liraglutide 3.0 mg over a period of 78 weeks. Body composition was examined via dual x-ray absorptiometry at 16 and 32 weeks, with body weight captured up until 78 weeks for all patients. Weight loss (R2  = 0.39, p < .001), fat mass loss (R2  = 0.32, p = .003) and fat-free mass loss (R2  = 0.19, p = .03) were all associated with weight change from artificial nadir, which was, on average, 3.8 kg. For body composition, after adjustment, only fat mass loss was associated weight regain (R2  = 0.32, p = .01). In conclusion, in patients with clinical obesity treated with liraglutide 3.0 mg in a real-world clinical setting, fat mass loss was associated with weight regain. Whilst weight regain occurred on average, the magnitude was less than that observed in patients treated with lifestyle alone and weight loss remained clinically significant for most patients.

Effectiveness and persistence of anti-obesity medications (liraglutide 3 mg, lorcaserin, and orlistat) in a real-world primary care setting

BACKGROUND

Obesity is a chronic disease with rising prevalence. Guidelines suggest medications for obesity management if lifestyle interventions do not lead to substantial weight loss. Randomized control trials have shown the efficacy of anti-obesity medications in inducing weight loss, but real-world data are lacking. Therefore, our study aims to evaluate anti-obesity medications' effectiveness in reducing weight and improving cardiometabolic parameters and to assess their persistence in a real-world setting.

METHODS

A historical cohort study using routinely collected data from Clalit Health Services (CHS). We retrieved data on all CHS members aged ≥20 years who initiated anti-obesity medication (orlistat, liraglutide 3 mg, and lorcaserin) between 2018 and 2020. We assessed average weight loss and the percentage of patients that had lost ≥5% and ≥10% of their body weight at 3, 6, and 9 months and compared the effectiveness of these 3 medications.

RESULTS

We included 5,306 CHS members in our study; most (77.8%) were female, aged 40-59 years (52.4%). Treatment with liraglutide 3 mg and lorcaserin was associated with subsequent weight reduction. The average weight loss at 6 months was 5.6 kg (4.95-6.25, 95% confidence interval [CI]) with liraglutide 3 mg and 1.7 kg (1.2-2.2, 95% CI) with lorcaserin. There was no evidence that treatment with orlistat was associated with subsequent weight loss (-0.18 kg [-0.8 to 0.4, 95% CI]). At 6 months, 38% of the patients with orlistat, 43% with lorcaserin, and 51% with liraglutide 3 mg persisted with their treatments (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Liraglutide 3 mg was the primary medication associated with clinically significant weight loss and had the highest persistence rate in our real-world study.

Real-world primary nonadherence to antiobesity medications

BACKGROUND: Primary nonadherence (PNA), when a medication is newly prescribed but not filled, has been identified as a major research gap potentially impacting the optimal treatment of patients with overweight and obesity who are newly prescribed antiobesity medications (AOMs). OBJECTIVES: To assess PNA among patients with newly prescribed AOMs and to examine factors associated with PNA to AOMs. METHODS: This was a retrospective study that used the Optum Integrated Clinical plus Claims database to identify individuals who had at least 1 prescription order for an AOM the US Food and Drug Administration approved for long-term use. Individuals with prescription orders between January 1, 2012, and February 28, 2019, were identified, and patient demographics, clinical characteristics, medication prescribed, baseline health care utilization, and obesity-related complications were described by PNA status. PNA was defined as no pharmacy claim for the AOM within 60 days of the date of the new prescription order as identified in electronic health record data. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to examine factors associated with PNA. RESULTS: The study sample included a total of 1,563 patients. The mean body mass index was 38.4 kg/m2; 10.7% were prescribed liraglutide 3.0 mg, 26.0% were prescribed lorcaserin, 36.3% of patients were prescribed naltrexone-bupropion, 5.4% were prescribed orlistat, and 21.6% were prescribed phentermine-topiramate. Most patients (91.1%) exhibited PNA, with only 8.9% filling their newly prescribed AOM within 60 days. Both the adherent and nonadherent groups were predominately female sex, White, and covered by commercial insurance. The mean age was similar between the 2 groups. Most obesity-related complications were less prevalent in the adherent group, although the Charlson comorbidity index score was similar between the 2 groups. After adjustment for patient demographics and clinical characteristics, there was not a statistically significant association between the specific AOM and PNA (P = 0.299). Patients with depression or living in the Midwest or South regions were at significantly increased risk of PNA. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of PNA to AOMs was very high, suggesting barriers in effective medical management of patients with overweight and obesity. Future research is warranted to understand reasons for PNA to AOMs and how to address these barriers. DISCLOSURES: Dr Kan, Dr Bae, Dr Dunn, and Dr Ahmad are employees of Eli Lilly and Company. Ms Buysman and Dr Gronroos are employees of Optum. Dr Swindle was an employee of Optum at the time the study was conducted and is currently employed at Evidera. Dr Bengtson is employed at Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Boehringer Ingelheim has no connection to this study), and during the conduct of this study was employed at Optum.

Promising translatable pharmacological interventions for body weight management in individuals with severe mental illness - a narrative review

INTRODUCTION

Psychotropic medications, especially antipsychotics, have been consistently shown to cause weight gain in individuals with severe mental illness (SMI), a population inherently challenged by poor physical health. Consequently, compared to the general population, this contributes to an increased cardiometabolic burden, including the risk of type 2 diabetes, dyslipidemia, and hypertension. Furthermore, comorbid obesity leads to treatment nonadherence, decreased quality of life, and increased risk of relapse, posing a challenge in the management of mental health. To address this, emerging agents investigated in the general population with potential to mitigate weight gain were explored to assess translatability to the SMI population.

AREAS COVERED

A literature search was conducted including agents approved for the management of obesity in the general population, along with upcoming agents under investigation in phase III trials with weight loss properties.

EXPERT OPINION

Metformin and topiramate along with lifestyle interventions are commonly prescribed for weight gain in individuals with SMI; however, their weight loss potential is modest at best. This review identified tirzepatide and cagrilintide-semaglutide among others as promising agents for adjunctive pharmacological management of weight gain.

Five-year Weight Loss Maintenance With Obesity Pharmacotherapy

CONTEXT

Long-term treatment of obesity with lifestyle changes alone is unsustainable for most individuals because of several factors including adherence and metabolic adaptation. Medical management of obesity has proven efficacy for up to 3 years in randomized controlled trials. However, there is a dearth of information regarding real-world outcomes beyond 3 years.

OBJECTIVE

This work aimed to assess long-term weight loss outcomes over a 2.5- to 5.5-year period with US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved and off-label antiobesity medications (AOMs).

METHODS

A cohort of 428 patients with overweight or obesity were treated with AOMs at an academic weight management center with an initial visit between April 1, 2014, and April 1, 2016. Intervention included FDA-approved and off-label AOMs. The primary outcome was percentage weight loss from initial to final visit. Key secondary outcomes included weight reduction targets as well as demographic and clinical predictors of long-term weight loss.

RESULTS

The average weight loss was 10.4% at a mean follow-up duration of 4.4 years. The proportions of patients who met the weight reduction targets of 5% or greater, 10% or greater, 15% or greater, and 20% or greater were 70.8%, 48.1%, 29.9%, and 17.1%, respectively. On average, 51% of maximum weight loss was regained, while 40.2% of patients maintained their weight loss. In a multivariable regression analysis, a higher number of clinic visits was associated with more weight loss. Metformin, topiramate, and bupropion were associated with increased odds of maintaining 10% or greater weight loss.

CONCLUSION

Clinically significant long-term weight loss of 10% or more beyond 4 years is achievable in clinical practice settings with obesity pharmacotherapy.

Cost-Effectiveness of Pharmacotherapy for the Treatment of Obesity in Adolescents

Importance

Antiobesity pharmacotherapy is recommended for adolescents ages 12 years and older with obesity. Several medications have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for adolescent use, but the most cost-effective medication remains unclear.

Objective

To estimate the cost-effectiveness of lifestyle counseling alone and as adjunct to liraglutide, mid-dose phentermine and topiramate (7.5 mg phentermine and 46 mg topiramate), top-dose phentermine and topiramate (15 mg phentermine and 92 mg topiramate), or semaglutide among adolescent patients with obesity.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This economic evaluation used a microsimulation model to project health and cost outcomes of lifestyle counseling alone and adjunct to liraglutide, mid-dose phentermine and topiramate, top-dose phentermine and topiramate, or semaglutide over 13 months, 2 years, and 5 years among a hypothetical cohort of 100 000 adolescents with obesity, defined as an initial body mass index (BMI; calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared) of 37. Model inputs were derived from clinical trials, published literature, and national sources. Data were analyzed from April 2022 to July 2023.

Exposures

Lifestyle counseling alone and as adjunct to liraglutide, mid-dose phentermine and topiramate, top-dose phentermine and topiramate, or semaglutide.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The main outcome was quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), costs (2022 US dollars), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), with future costs and QALYs discounted 3.0% annually. A strategy was considered cost-effective if the ICER was less than $100 000 per QALY gained. The preferred strategy was determined as the strategy with the greatest increase in QALYs while being cost-effective. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were used to assess parameter uncertainty.

Results

The model simulated 100 000 adolescents at age 15 with an initial BMI of 37, of whom 58 000 (58%) were female. At 13 months and 2 years, lifestyle counseling was estimated to be the preferred strategy. At 5 years, top-dose phentermine and topiramate was projected to be the preferred strategy with an ICER of $56 876 per QALY gained vs lifestyle counseling. Semaglutide was projected to yield the most QALYs, but with an unfavorable ICER of $1.1 million per QALY gained compared with top-dose phentermine and topiramate. Model results were most sensitive to utility of weight reduction and weight loss of lifestyle counseling and top-dose phentermine and topiramate.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this economic evaluation of pharmacotherapy for adolescents with obesity, top-dose phentermine and topiramate as adjunct to lifestyle counseling was estimated to be cost-effective after 5 years. Long-term clinical trials in adolescents are needed to fully evaluate the outcomes of pharmacotherapy, especially into adulthood.

Association of topiramate prescribed for any indication with reduced alcohol consumption in electronic health record data

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Topiramate is a medication that is widely prescribed to treat a variety of conditions, including alcohol use disorder (AUD). We used electronic health record (EHR) data to measure topiramate's effects on drinking in individuals differentiated by a history of AUD.

DESIGN

Parallel-groups comparison of patients prescribed topiramate and a propensity score-matched comparison group.

SETTING

A large US integrated health-care system.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-Consumption (AUDIT-C) scores prior to and after a minimum of 180 days of topiramate prescription for any indication and a propensity score-matched group. The sample included 5918 patients with an electronic health record diagnosis of alcohol use disorder at any time (AUD-hx-pos) (1738 topiramate-exposed and 4180 controls) and 23 614 patients with no EHR diagnosis of AUD (AUD-hx-neg) (6324 topiramate-exposed and 17 290 controls).

MEASUREMENTS

Regression analyses compared difference-in-difference (DiD) estimates, separately by AUD history. DiD estimates represent exposure-group (i.e. topiramate versus control) differences on the pre-post difference in AUDIT-C score. Effects of baseline AUDIT-C score and daily topiramate dosage were also tested.

FINDINGS

AUD-hx-neg patients who received topiramate had a greater reduction in AUDIT-C score (-0.11) than matched controls (-0.04). This yielded a DiD score of -0.07 [95% confidence interval (CI) = -0.11,-0.03; P = 0.002], with the greatest effect among AUD-hx-neg patients with a baseline AUDIT-C score of 4+ (DiD = -0.35, 95% CI = -0.49, -0.21; P < 0.0001) and those prescribed > 150 mg/day of the medication (DiD = -0.15, 95%CI = -0.23, -0.07; P < 0.001).

DISCUSSION

Among individuals with no history of alcohol use disorder, topiramate appears to be associated with reduced drinking. This small effect is most evident among patients with higher baseline drinking levels and at a higher average daily topiramate dosage.

Chinese herbal medicine is associated with higher body weight reduction than liraglutide among the obese population: A real-world comparative cohort study

Introduction: In Taiwan, many people receive Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) as an alternative choice to help control body weight. However, the clinical effectiveness of CHM on weight control has not been well studied, while potential risks and adverse effects are still unknown. The aim of our study is to find out a safe and efficient treatment model of CHM for weight control compared to liraglutide in a real-world setting.

Methods: we retrospectively analyzed obese subjects [body mass index (BMI)≧25 kg/m2] from Chang Gung Research Database (2013–2018). We evaluated the effect on body weight and BMI changes in obese groups receiving CHM or western medicine (WM, represented liraglutide) within 180 days. The proportion of subjects who achieved 5 and 10% weight reduction was calculated as well. Furthermore, the potential adverse events were analyzed during the study period. Overlap weighting was used to balance the baseline differences between CHM and WM groups.

Results: The full cohort comprised 1,360 participants: 701 in the CHM group and 659 in the WM group. At baseline, the CHM group was younger (42.75 ± 12.12 years old in CHM vs. 52.31 ± 11.7 years old in WM, p-value &lt;0.001) and has more female subjects (77.6% in CHM vs. 53.0% in WM, p-value &lt;0.001). On the other hand, CHM users had lower body weight (79.83 ± 15.66 kg vs. 84.68 ± 17.14 kg, p-value &lt;0.001) and BMI (30.58 ± 5.20 vs. 32.84 ± 6.95, p-value &lt;0.001). At day 180, CHM users lost more body weight (−4.5 ± 4.07 kg vs. −2.15 ± 4.05 kg, p-value &lt;0.001) and higher reduction in BMI (−1.77 ± 1.73 vs. −0.9 ± 2.14, p-value &lt;0.001). A total of 53.21% (n = 373) CHM users lost at least 5% of body weight (22.46% for WM users, p-value &lt;0.001), and 18.97% (n = 132) lost at least 10% of body weight (4.55% for WM users, p-value &lt;0.001). The benefit remained consistent with and without overlap weighting. For adverse events, 18 cases of hypertension occurred in 659 subjects in the WM group (2.7%) in comparison to 1 of 701 subjects in the CHM group (0.1%).

Conclusion: CHM led to clinically meaningful weight loss without serious adverse events in a real-world setting. Further clinical trials are warranted to validate this result.

A narrative review of anti-obesity medications for obese patients with osteoarthritis

INTRODUCTION

: The prevalence of both obesity and osteoarthritis (OA) are increasing worldwide (twindemic), and the association between the two chronic diseases is also well-established.

AREAS COVERED

: In this narrative review, we will briefly describe the double burdens of both diseases, the impact of weight loss or gain on OA incidence and structural progression and discuss the biomechanical and anti-inflammatory mechanisms mediating these effects. FDA-approved anti-obesity drugs are summarized in terms of their clinical efficacy and safety profile, and the completed or ongoing phase 2/3 clinical trials of such drugs in OA patients with obesity are examined.

EXPERT OPINION

: We will discuss the perspectives related to principles of prescription of anti-obesity drugs, the potential role of phenotype-guided approach, time to drug effects in clinical trials, sustainability of weight loss based on the real-world studies, the importance of concomitant therapies such as dieting and exercises, and the role of weight loss on non-weight bearing OA joints. Although obesity is the major risk factor for OA pathogenesis and progression, and there are a variety of anti-obesity medications on the market, research on the use of these disease-modifying drugs in OA (DMOAD) is still sparse..

Cost-effectiveness analysis of semaglutide 2.4 mg for the treatment of adult patients with overweight and obesity in the United States

BACKGROUND: The rising prevalence and associated public health burden of obesity has led to advancements in pharmaceuticals for weight management. Semaglutide 2.4 mg, an anti-obesity medication (AOM) recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, has demonstrated clinically relevant weight loss in its phase 3 clinical trials. Economic evaluation comparing semaglutide 2.4 mg with other available weight management therapies is essential to inform payers for decision-making. OBJECTIVES: To assess the cost-effectiveness of semaglutide 2.4 mg in the treatment of adult patients with obesity (ie, body mass index [BMI] ≥ 30) and adult patients who are overweight (ie, BMI 27-29.9) with 1 or more weight-related comorbidities from a US third-party payer perspective. METHODS: A cohort Markov model was constructed to compare semaglutide 2.4 mg with the following comparators: no treatment, diet and exercise (D&E), and 3 branded AOMs (liraglutide 3 mg, phentermine-topiramate, and naltrexone-bupropion). All AOMs, including semaglutide 2.4 mg, were assumed to be taken in conjunction with D&E. Changes in BMI, blood pressure, cholesterol level, experience of acute and chronic obesity-related complications, costs, and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were simulated over 30 years based on pivotal trials of the AOMs and other relevant literature. Drug and health care prices reflect 2021 standardized values. Cost-effectiveness was examined with a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $150,000 per QALY gained. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to test the robustness of the cost-effectiveness results to plausible variation in model inputs. RESULTS: In the base-case analysis, treatment with semaglutide 2.4 mg was estimated to improve QALYs by 0.138 to 0.925 and incur higher costs by $3,254 to $25,086 over the 30-year time horizon vs comparators. Semaglutide 2.4 mg is cost-effective against all comparators at the prespecified WTP threshold, with the incremental cost per QALY gained ranging from $23,556 to $144,296 per QALY gained. In the sensitivity analysis, extended maximum treatment duration, types of subsequent treatment following therapy discontinuation, and weight-rebound rates were identified as key drivers for model results. The estimated probability of semaglutide 2.4 mg being cost-effective compared with comparators ranged from 67% to 100% when varying model parameters and assumptions. CONCLUSIONS: As a long-term weight management therapy, semaglutide 2.4 mg was estimated to be cost-effective compared with no treatment, D&E alone, and all other branded AOM comparators under a WTP threshold of $150,000 per QALY gained over a 30-year time horizon. DISCLOSURES: Financial support for this research was provided by Novo Nordisk Inc. The study sponsor was involved in several aspects of the research, including the study design, the interpretation of data, the writing of the manuscript, and the decision to submit the manuscript for publication. Dr Kim and Ms Ramasamy are employees of Novo Nordisk Inc. Ms Kumar and Dr Burudpakdee were employees of Novo Nordisk Inc at the time this study was conducted. Dr Sullivan received research support from Novo Nordisk Inc for this study. Drs Wang, Song, Wu, Ms Xie, and Ms Sun are employees of Analysis Group, Inc, who received consultancy fees from Novo Nordisk Inc in connection with this study.

Weight loss interventions and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: Optimizing liver outcomes

The growth in prevalence of obesity, type 2 diabetes and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has become one of the most important global health challenges. The three chronic diseases are closely linked in their epidemiology and pathophysiology. Currently, weight loss is the most effective treatment for NAFLD (even in the minority of patients with NAFLD who do not have obesity) and is recommended in all national and international guidelines. Accumulating evidence has shown that weight loss, whether achieved by diet and lifestyle interventions, bariatric surgery or pharmacotherapy, can improve biomarkers of NAFLD, as well as prevent progression and, in some cases, reverse fibrosis. There is a dose dependency of weight loss with NAFLD improvement. Pharmacotherapy with antiobesity medications, alone or in combination with intensive lifestyle interventions or other weight-loss drugs, is closing the efficacy gap between diet and exercise and weight-loss surgery in efficacy at reversing obesity. Given the importance of providing effective weight-loss treatment to patients with NAFLD, weight management services need to be made increasingly available and embedded within hepatology services. This narrative review addresses the evidence that weight loss optimizes liver outcomes in people with NAFLD.

Retrospective descriptive analysis of a managed care population with obesity

OBJECTIVES

To reveal the extent of obesity in a single healthcare system and provide a blueprint for other health systems to perform similar analyses, this study describes characteristics and weight change patterns of patients classified with overweight and obesity at a large integrated delivery network (IDN) in the South-Central United States.

METHODS

A descriptive, observational, retrospective study was conducted using electronic medical records and claims data. Patients were ≥18 years old, body mass index (BMI) ≥27 kg/m², and continuously enrolled in the IDN plan for ≥6 months before and ≥12 months after the index date. Demographics, comorbidities, BMI, and weight were collected. Weight changes were assessed annually, and anti-obesity medications (AOM) use was also captured.

RESULTS

A total of 36,430 eligible patients were identified. A subset of 22,712 patients was continuously enrolled for the entire study period (mean age: 57.2) and were primarily white (83.3%) and commercially insured (54.3%). Most patients were categorized as overweight (40.1%) or obesity class I (32.5%) at baseline. At years 1 and 4 post-index, patients who maintained index weight (±3%) was 56.2% and 37.0%, respectively, whereas weight gain (≥3% increase) was 23.7% and 33.3%, respectively. AOM use (1.1%) primarily consisted of phentermine-hydrochloride (n = 114, 0.5%) and orlistat (n = 115, 0.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

An increasing proportion of patients gained weight over time, combined with low AOM use, emphasizing the need for weight-loss interventions in this population. Findings from this study provide a foundation for health systems to perform similar analyses.

Sex/Gender Differences in Obesity Prevalence, Comorbidities, and Treatment

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Obesity is a heterogeneous condition, yet sex/gender is rarely considered in the prevention or clinical care of this disease. This review examined and evaluated recent literature regarding the influence of sex and gender on obesity prevalence, comorbidities, and treatment in adults.

RECENT FINDINGS

Obesity is more prevalent in women than men in most countries, but in some countries and population subgroups, this gap is more pronounced. Several obesity-related comorbidities, including type 2 diabetes and hypertension, demonstrate sex-specific pathways. Women, compared to men, are more likely to be diagnosed with obesity and seek and obtain all types of obesity treatment including behavioral, pharmacological, and bariatric surgery. Men tend to have greater absolute weight loss, but this difference is attenuated once accounting for baseline weight. Obesity is a multifactorial condition with complex interactions among sex/gender, sociocultural, environmental, and physiological factors. More sex/gender research is needed to investigate mechanisms underlying sex/gender differences in prevalence, comorbidities, and treatment, identify ways to increase men's interest and participation in obesity treatment, and examine differences in obesity prevalence and treatments for transgender and gender non-conforming individuals.

Effectiveness of anti-obesity medications approved for long-term use in a multidisciplinary weight management program: a multi-center clinical experience

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Randomized clinical trials have proven the efficacy and safety of Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved anti-obesity medications (AOMs) for long-term use. It is unclear whether these outcomes can be replicated in real-world clinical practice where clinical complexities arise. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and side effects of these medications in real-world multidisciplinary clinical practice settings.

METHODS

We reviewed the electronic medical records (EMR) of patients with obesity who were prescribed an FDA-approved AOM for long-term use in academic and community multidisciplinary weight loss programs between January 2016 and January 2020.

INTERVENTION

We assessed percentage total body weight loss (%TBWL), metabolic outcomes, and side effect profile up to 24 months after AOM initiation.

RESULTS

The full cohort consisted of 304 patients (76% women, 95.2% White, median age of 50 years old [IQR, 39-58]). The median follow-up time was 9.1 months [IQR, 4.2-14.1] with a median number of 3 visits [IQR, 2-4]. The most prescribed medication was phentermine/topiramate extended-release (ER) (51%), followed by liraglutide (26.3%), bupropion/naltrexone sustained-release (SR) (16.5%), and lorcaserin (6.2%). %TBWL was 5.0%, 6.8%, 9.3%, 10.3%, and 10.5% at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. 60.2% of the entire cohort achieved at least 5% TBWL. Overall, phentermine/topiramate-ER had the most robust weight loss response during follow-up, with the highest %TBWL at 12 months of 12.0%. Adverse events were reported in 22.4% of patients. Only 9% of patients discontinued the medication due to side effects.

CONCLUSIONS

AOMs resulted in significant long-term weight loss, that was comparable to outcomes previously reported in clinical trials.

Clinical outcomes associated with anti-obesity medications in real-world practice: A systematic literature review

Anti-obesity medications (AOMs) are efficacious and well tolerated in randomized controlled trials, but findings may not be generalizable to routine clinical practice. This systematic literature review aimed to identify real-world (RW) evidence for AOMs to treat adults ( ≥ 18 years) with obesity or overweight (BMI  ≥  27 kg/m² ). Searches conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Database, National Health Service (NHS) Economic Evaluation Database, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for studies of relevant FDA-approved AOMs yielded 41 publications. Weight loss (WL) was consistently observed, with 14% to 58.6% of patients achieving ≥ 5% WL on orlistat, phentermine/topiramate, naltrexone/bupropion, phentermine, or liraglutide in studies of 3-6 months' duration where this was measured. When cardiometabolic risk factors were assessed, AOMs reduced or had no impact on blood pressure, lipids, or glycemia. RW data on the impact of AOMs on existing obesity-related comorbidities and mortality were generally lacking. AOMs were associated with various adverse events, but these were of mild to moderate severity and no unexpected safety signals were reported. A pattern of poor adherence and persistence with AOMs was observed across studies. Overall, the review confirmed the effectiveness of AOMs in RW settings but demonstrated large gaps in the evidence base.

Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Anti-Obesity Treatment: Where Do We Stand?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

As a chronic and relapsing disease, obesity impairs metabolism and causes cardiovascular diseases. Although behavioral modification is important for the treatment of obesity, it is difficult to achieve an ideal weight or sustain the process of long-term weight loss. Therefore, the obesity control guidelines strongly recommend lifestyle interventions along with medical treatment for patients who are overweight. There is sufficient evidence supporting that pharmacotherapy in combination with behavior-based interventions can result in significant weight loss and improved cardiometabolism.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent meta-analyses of new anti-obesity drugs and their weight-loss efficacy have shown that the overall placebo-subtracted weight reduction (%) for at least 12 months ranged from 2.9 to 6.8% for the following drugs: phentermine/topiramate (6.8%), liraglutide (5.4%), naltrexone/bupropion (4.0%), orlistat (2.9%), and lorcaserin (3.1%). However, very recently, on February 13, 2020, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) ordered the withdrawal of lorcaserin from markets, as a clinical trial to assess drug safety showed an increased risk of cancer. Currently, the anti-obesity medications that have been approved by the FDA for chronic weight management are orlistat, phentermine/topiramate, naltrexone/bupropion, and liraglutide. However, they are costly and may have adverse effects in some individuals. Therefore, drug therapy should be initiated in obese individuals after weighing its benefits and risks. One of the strategies for long-term obesity control is that anti-obesity medications should be tailored for specific patients depending on their chronic conditions, comorbidities, and preferences.

Obstetrician-Gynecologists' Strategies for Patient Initiation and Maintenance of Antiobesity Treatment with Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists

Obesity is a chronic disease affecting women at higher rates than men. In an obstetrics and gynecology setting, frequently encountered obesity-related complications are polycystic ovary syndrome, fertility and pregnancy complications, and increased risk of breast and gynecological cancers. Obstetrician-gynecologists (OBGYNs) are uniquely positioned to diagnose and treat obesity, given their role in women's primary health care and the increasing prevalence of obesity-related fertility and pregnancy complications. The metabolic processes of bodyweight regulation are complex, which makes weight-loss maintenance challenging, despite dietary modifications and exercise. Antiobesity medications (AOMs) can facilitate weight loss by targeting appetite regulation. There are four AOMs currently approved for long-term use in the United States, of which liraglutide 3.0 mg is among the most efficacious. Liraglutide 3.0 mg, a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA), is superior to placebo in achieving weight loss and improving cardiometabolic profile, in both clinical trial and real-world settings. In addition, women with fertility complications receiving liraglutide 1.8–3.0 mg can benefit from improved ovarian function and fertility. Liraglutide 3.0 mg is generally well tolerated, but associated with transient gastrointestinal side effects, which can be mitigated. In this review, we present the risks of obesity and benefits of weight loss for women, and summarize clinical development of GLP-1 RAs for weight management. Finally, we provide practical advice and recommendations for OBGYNs to open the discussion about bodyweight with their patients, initiate lifestyle modification and GLP-1 RA treatment, and help them persist with these interventions to achieve optimal weight loss with associated health benefits.

Effectiveness of liraglutide 3 mg for the treatment of obesity in a real-world setting without intensive lifestyle intervention

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the efficacy and safety of liraglutide 3 mg daily in combination with diet and exercise 2, 4, and 6 months after initiation in real-world settings in Korea.

METHODS

People first using liraglutide starting in 2018 were recruited from ten sites in Korea. Body weight and body mass index (BMI) were measured after 2, 4, and 6 months and compared with baseline values.

RESULTS

The full cohort comprised 769 participants: 672 in the 2-month group, 427 in the 4-month group, and 219 in the 6-month group. The baseline mean ± standard deviation of BMI and body weight were 32.2 ± 5.1 kg/m², and 87.5 ± 18.8 kg, respectively. Body weight and BMI decreased after initiation of liraglutide treatment: -2.94 kg and -1.08 kg/m² at 2 months; -4.23 kg and -1.55 kg/m² at 4 months, and -5.14 kg and -1.89 kg/m² at 6 months (all P < 0.001). In the 6-month cohort, 52.5% and 18.3% of subjects lost ≥5% and ≥10% of body weight, respectively. After 6 months, systolic and diastolic blood pressure decreased significantly by 3.90 and 1.93 mmHg, respectively. In those with diabetes mellitus, HbA1c and fasting glucose levels decreased significantly by 1.14% and 27.8 mg/dl, respectively. Among all participants, 27.6% experienced adverse effects, including nausea (20.8%), vomiting (5.2%), diarrhoea (2.5%), and skin rash (3.6%). Documented reasons for discontinuation of treatment were lack of effect (4.4%), adverse events (4.3%), and high cost (3.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

In real-world settings in Korea, daily treatment with liraglutide 3 mg was associated with clinically meaningful weight loss without serious adverse events.

Patient initiation and maintenance of GLP-1 RAs for treatment of obesity: a narrative review and practical considerations for primary care providers

Obesity is a chronic, relapsing metabolic disease, linked to a number of health risks and serious complications. Although highly prevalent in adults in the United States, it is underdiagnosed and untreated. Primary care providers (PCPs) are uniquely poised to diagnose and treat patients with obesity, using a selection of treatment strategies including lifestyle modifications and pharmacotherapies. As a physiological regulator of appetite and energy intake, the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) liraglutide 3.0 mg is approved for chronic weight management in individuals with overweight (pre-obesity) or obesity. In this review, we provide an overview of the clinical data supporting the use of liraglutide 3.0 mg, as well as practical advice for PCPs on the initiation and maintenance of treatment over the long term. This also covers the management of side effects and how to manage patient expectations over time.

Real-world persistence with liraglutide 3.0 mg for weight management and the SaxendaCare® patient support program

OBJECTIVE

Weight management medications can significantly increase patients' chances of achieving a clinically meaningful weight loss if patients persist with treatment. This retrospective observational study of de-identified medical records of 311 patients is the first real-world study examining persistence with liraglutide 3.0 mg in Canada, and also investigates associations between the SaxendaCare® patient support program and persistence and weight loss.

METHODS

Overall persistence was assessed, as well as associations of enrollment in SaxendaCare®, persistence and weight loss.

RESULTS

Overall mean (standard deviation) persistence with liraglutide 3.0 mg was 6.3 (4.1) months, and 67.5% (n = 210) and 53.7% (n = 167) of patients persisted for ≥4 and ≥ 6 months, respectively. Enrollment in SaxendaCare® was associated with significantly longer persistence with liraglutide 3.0 mg and greater weight loss. Patients enrolled in SaxendaCare® (n = 119) persisted for 7.9 (4.0) versus 5.2 (3.8) months for those not enrolled (n = 184) (p < 0.001), and had significantly greater percent weight loss after 6 months regardless of the duration of their persistence (-7.9% vs -5.5% from baseline, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that, in clinical settings, persistence with liraglutide 3.0 mg can exceed 6 months, and that enrolling in SaxendaCare® may be associated with comparatively longer persistence and, regardless of persistence, greater weight loss.

The limits and challenges of antiobesity pharmacotherapy

INTRODUCTION

Pharmacotherapy is a useful adjunct when patients with obesity are unable to achieve adequate benefit from lifestyle interventions.

AREAS COVERED

This review covers the history of antiobesity drugs, efficacy, and risks of currently approved drugs, limits of their usefulness in clinical practice, gaps in knowledge, methodological limitations of clinical trials, and reasons for underutilization.

EXPERT OPINION

In randomized controlled trials, currently approved antiobesity drugs have yielded an average weight loss ranging from approximately 3% to 9% relative to placebo at 1 year. Inadequate inclusion of racial and ethnic minorities and men, and high dropout rates in clinical trials limit generalizability of these findings to clinical practice. Weight loss achieved with antiobesity drugs is generally associated with lowered glycemia, but improvements in blood pressure and lipid measures tend to be marginal. There is limited evidence for sustained weight loss beyond 1 year and for safety and efficacy of antiobesity drugs in children and adolescents, and in post-bariatric surgery patients. None have demonstrated reduction in major adverse cardiovascular events or other significant disease outcomes. Limited health insurance coverage and negative perceptions of physicians have hindered the utilization of antiobesity drugs.

The Societal Value of Broader Access to Antiobesity Medications

OBJECTIVE

Obesity and its complications place an enormous burden on society. Yet antiobesity medications (AOM) are prescribed to only 2% of the eligible population, even though few individuals can sustain weight loss using other strategies alone. This study estimated the societal value of greater access to AOM.

METHODS

By using a well-established simulation model (The Health Economics Medical Innovation Simulation), the societal value of AOM for the cohort of Americans aged ≥ 25 years in 2019 was quantified. Four scenarios with differential uptake among the eligible population (15% and 30%) were modeled, with efficacy from current and next-generation AOM. Societal value was measured as monetized quality of life, productivity gains, and savings in medical spending, subtracting the costs of AOM.

RESULTS

For the 217 million Americans aged ≥ 25 years, AOM generated $1.2 trillion in lifetime societal value under a conservative scenario (15% annual uptake using currently available AOM). The introduction of next-generation AOM increased societal value to $1.9 to $2.5 trillion, depending on uptake. Finally, societal value was higher for younger individuals and Black and Hispanic individuals compared with White individuals.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that AOM provide substantial gains to patients and society. Policies promoting broader clinical access to and use of AOM warrant consideration to reach national goals to reduce obesity.

Age- and Sex-Specific Increases in Stimulant Prescribing Rates-California, 2008-2017

Objective: To describe trends in prevalent and incident stimulant prescribing between 2008 and 2017 in California. Method: Statewide trends were estimated by age and sex category for prevalent (any) and incident (no prescriptions in the preceding 2 years) stimulant prescribing while adjusting for area-level covariates. Results: Prevalent prescribing rates increased by 126%, while incident prescribing increased 23%. Patients aged 25 to 44 years experienced over 200% increases in prevalent prescribing and 34% to 55% increases in incident prescribing. Among patients older than 25, women had consistently higher prescribing rates than men. ZIP code tabulation areas with the largest minority populations had the lowest baseline prescribing rates but experienced the greatest annual prescription rate increases. Conclusion: Adult stimulant prescribing increased substantially for early working aged adults. Prescription rates were greater for women than men.

Effectiveness and tolerability of orlistat and liraglutide in patients with obesity in a real-world setting: The XENSOR Study

AIMS

To evaluate in a real-world setting the effectiveness of two drugs, orlistat and liraglutide, in patients with overweight or obesity and insufficient weight loss (WL) after a lifestyle modification programme.

METHODS

Retrospective, observational cohort study comparing clinical outcomes of orlistat 120 mg three times a day and liraglutide (up to 3 mg daily) in adult patients with BMI ≥30 kg/m² or ≥27 kg/m² with at least a weight-related comorbidity who had failed to lose at least 5% of their weight after 6 months of lifestyle modification. The co-primary end-points, assessed at 3-6 months and at the end of the follow-up, were weight change from baseline, proportion of patients who lost at least 5% of their baseline weight and adjusted differences in WL between both drugs.

RESULTS

Five hundred patients, 400 in the group of orlistat (age 47.0, weight 107.8 kg) and 100 in the group of liraglutide (age 51.9 years, weight 105.1 kg), were included. Treatment with both drugs significantly reduced weight, fasting plasma glucose, systolic BP, low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol and alanine transaminase over a median follow-up period of 7 months. WL with liraglutide (-7.7 kg) was significantly greater than that observed with orlistat (-3.3 kg), and more individuals lost at least 5% of their baseline weight with liraglutide (64.7%) than with orlistat (27.4%). Rates of prediabetes significantly decreased with liraglutide in comparison to orlistat.

CONCLUSIONS

In this real-world study, liraglutide showed a greater effectiveness in WL compared with orlistat and improved several obesity-associated metabolic and cardiovascular risk factors.

[Pharmacological treatment of obesity for Primary Care physicians]

Obesity is a disease of high prevalence in Primary Care clinics. It is associated with major comorbidities (dyslipidaemia, diabetes, hypertension) that increase morbidity and mortality, health expenditure, and reduces the quality of life of patients. Changes in lifestyle are still the pillars of the treatment of excess weight. Pharmacological treatment should be considered when there are difficulties in achieving weight loss goals. In this article, a review is presented on the currently authorised drugs for the treatment of obesity and overweight with major comorbidities.