In vitro activity of ceftobiprole against frequently encountered aerobic and facultative Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial pathogens: results of the CANWARD 2007–2009 study

New Antibiotics for Staphylococcus aureus Infection: An Update from the World Association of Infectious Diseases and Immunological Disorders (WAidid) and the Italian Society of Anti-Infective Therapy (SITA)

Staphylococcus aureus is an extremely virulent pathogen that is capable of quickly evolving and developing antibiotic resistance. To overcome this problem, new antibiotics have been developed. Some of these have been licenced for use in clinical practice, mainly for the treatment of adults with acute skin and soft tissue infections, in addition to both community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and nosocomial pneumonia (hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia). In this paper, the main characteristics and clinical use of new licenced anti-staphylococcal drugs have been discussed. In vitro studies have demonstrated that some new anti-staphylococcal antibiotics have better antimicrobial activity and, at least in certain cases, more favourable pharmacokinetic properties and higher safety and tolerability than the presently available anti-staphylococcal drugs. This suggests that they may have a potential use in reducing the risk of failure of S. aureus therapy. However, an in-depth analysis of microbiological and clinical studies carried out with these new drugs seems to indicate that further studies need to be conducted before the problem of resistance of S. aureus to the antibiotics available today can be completely solved. Considering the overall available research, the drugs that are active against S. aureus appear to present a great therapeutic opportunity for overcoming resistance to traditional therapy. There are advantages in the pharmacokinetic characteristics of some of these drugs and they have the potential to reduce hospital stays and economic costs associated with their use.

Nosocomial Pneumonia in the Era of Multidrug-Resistance: Updates in Diagnosis and Management

Nosocomial pneumonia (NP), including hospital-acquired pneumonia in non-intubated patients and ventilator-associated pneumonia, is one of the most frequent hospital-acquired infections, especially in the intensive care unit. NP has a significant impact on morbidity, mortality and health care costs, especially when the implicated pathogens are multidrug-resistant ones. This narrative review aims to critically review what is new in the field of NP, specifically, diagnosis and antibiotic treatment. Regarding novel imaging modalities, the current role of lung ultrasound and low radiation computed tomography are discussed, while regarding etiological diagnosis, recent developments in rapid microbiological confirmation, such as syndromic rapid multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction panels are presented and compared with conventional cultures. Additionally, the volatile compounds/electronic nose, a promising diagnostic tool for the future is briefly presented. With respect to NP management, antibiotics approved for the indication of NP during the last decade are discussed, namely, ceftobiprole medocaril, telavancin, ceftolozane/tazobactam, ceftazidime/avibactam, and meropenem/vaborbactam.

New cephalosporins for the treatment of pneumonia in internal medicine wards

The burden of hospital admission for pneumonia in internal medicine wards may not be underestimated; otherwise, cases of pneumonia are a frequent indication for antimicrobial prescriptions. Community- and hospital-acquired pneumonia are characterized by high healthcare costs, morbidity and non-negligible rates of fatality. The overcoming prevalence of resistant gram-negative and positive bacteria (e.g., methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, penicillin and ceftriaxone-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae, extended-spectrum β-lactamases and carbapenemases producing Enterobacteriaceae) has made the most of the first-line agents ineffective for treating lower respiratory tract infections. A broad-spectrum of activity, favourable pulmonary penetration, harmlessness and avoiding in some cases a combination therapy, characterise new cephalosporins such as ceftolozane/tazobactam, ceftobiprole, ceftazidime/avibactam and ceftaroline. We aimed to summarise the role and place in therapy of new cephalosporins in community- and hospital-acquired pneumonia within the setting of internal medicine wards. The "universal pneumonia antibiotic strategy" is no longer acceptable for treating lung infections. Antimicrobial therapy should be individualized considering local antimicrobial resistance and epidemiology, the stage of the illness and potential host factors predisposing to a high risk for specific pathogens.

Emerging drugs for treating methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Introduction: In clinical practice, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) represents a major threat and has been associated with high rates of inadequate antibiotic treatment and significant increases in morbidity, mortality, and overall healthcare costs. The association between the prescription of an inappropriate or delayed antibiotic and impaired clinical outcomes has been widely described. Areas covered: To address the threat of MRSA, many new therapeutic options with a peculiar activity against MRSA have been recently developed and approved. New agents are characterized by specific issues in terms of spectrum of activity, pharmacokinetics, risk of drug-drug interactions, and toxicity, with potential advantages that should be considered in everyday clinical practice. Expert opinion: The most attractive characteristic of new drugs is represented by the broad spectrum of activity against multidrug-resistant pathogens; moreover, new compounds in most cases are characterized by favorable toxicity profiles compared with old drugs currently used in clinical practice. Some of the new antimicrobials will be also available as oral formulations, with the potential for oral switch, even in infections due to resistant pathogens. In particular conditions/populations (e.g. liver failure, renal disease, pregnancy, diabetic, children, and elderly), novel antibiotics with reduced toxicity could be an important option, including after hospital discharge.

Ceftobiprole Activity against Bacteria from Skin and Skin Structure Infections in the United States from 2016 through 2018

Ceftobiprole medocaril is an advanced-generation cephalosporin prodrug that has qualified infectious disease product status granted by the US FDA and is currently being evaluated in phase 3 clinical trials in patients with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs) and in patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. In this study, the activity of ceftobiprole and comparators was evaluated against more than 7,300 clinical isolates collected in the United States from 2016 through 2018 from patients with skin and skin structure infections. The major species/pathogen groups were S. aureus (53%), Enterobacterales (23%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (7%), beta-hemolytic streptococci (6%), Enterococcus spp. (4%), and coagulase-negative staphylococci (2%). Ceftobiprole was highly active against S. aureus (MIC_50/90, 0.5/1 mg/liter; 99.7% susceptible by EUCAST criteria; 42% methicillin-resistant S. aureus [MRSA]). Ceftobiprole also exhibited potent activity against other Gram-positive cocci. The overall susceptibility of Enterobacterales to ceftobiprole was 84.8% (>99.0% susceptible for isolate subsets that exhibited a non-extended-spectrum β-lactamase [ESBL] phenotype). A total of 74.4% of P. aeruginosa, 100% of beta-hemolytic streptococci and coagulase-negative staphylococci, and 99.6% of Enterococcus faecalis isolates were inhibited by ceftobiprole at ≤4 mg/liter. As expected, ceftobiprole was largely inactive against Enterobacterales that contained ESBL genes and Enterococcus faecium Overall, ceftobiprole was highly active against most clinical isolates from the major Gram-positive and Gram-negative skin and skin structure pathogen groups collected at U.S. medical centers participating in the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program during 2016 to 2018. The broad-spectrum activity of ceftobiprole, including potent activity against MRSA, supports its further evaluation for a potential ABSSSI indication.

Ceftobiprole: drug evaluation and place in therapy

Introduction: Ceftobiprole is a fifth-generation cephalosporin with a broad spectrum of antimicrobial activity, including also methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Ceftobiprole is approved for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP), excluding ventilator-associated pneumonia, in several European and non-European countries. Areas covered: In this narrative review, we discuss the current place in therapy of ceftobiprole, both within and outside approved indications. An inductive MEDLINE/PubMed search of the available literature was conducted. Expert opinion: There are three main reasons which render ceftobiprole an attractive option for the empirical and targeted treatment of CAP and HAP: (i) its broad spectrum of activity; (ii) its activity against MRSA; (iii) its good safety profile. For these indications, ceftobiprole should be employed thoughtfully, in those scenarios in which its intrinsic advantages could be maximized. The use of ceftobiprole outside approved indications could be justified in specific scenarios, such as when other approved alternatives are ineffective, when the risk of toxicity due to other agents is unacceptable, and for salvage therapy. In the near future, ongoing phase 3 studies and further observational experiences could both enlarge the current panel of approved indications and enrich our knowledge on the use of ceftobiprole for off-label indications.

In vitro evidence of the synergistic interaction of ceftopibrole and other antibiotics against multidrug-resistant Gram-negative isolates

The purpose of the present study was to investigate the in vitro activity of ceftobiprole in combination with other antimicrobials against 27 selected Gram-negative isolates, including ESBL-producing E. coli and KPC-OXA-48-producing K. pneumoniae. Ceftobiprole activity in combination with amikacin, colistin, levofloxacin, piperacillin/tazobactam and rifampin was evaluated by time-kill curves and gradient-cross method (except colistin). Among the 27 strains tested with gradient strips most were resistant to ceftobiprole. Synergy was observed in some cases with piperacillin/tazobactam. There was at least one synergistic combination towards 9 isolates belonging to different species. No antagonism was observed with any of the antibiotic tested. In time-kill curves, performed for 12 selected isolates, synergistic interaction was more frequent, occurring with 32/60 combinations. The most interesting results of our study are the bactericidal effects of ceftobiprole in combination with colistin or piperacillin/tazobactam tested against Gram-negative isolates, including KPC and OXA-48-producing K. pneumoniae.

Ceftobiprole activity when tested against contemporary bacteria causing bloodstream infections in the United States (2016-2017)

Ceftobiprole medocaril, the prodrug of ceftobiprole, is an advanced-generation cephalosporin that is approved in many European and non-European countries for the treatment of adults with hospital-acquired pneumonia (excluding ventilator-associated pneumonia) and community-acquired pneumonia and is currently being evaluated in a global phase 3 clinical trial of patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. This study investigated the in vitro activity of ceftobiprole and comparators against a total of 5466 gram-positive and -negative isolates from bloodstream infections (BSIs) that were collected in the United States during 2016 and 2017 as part of the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program. Ceftobiprole was highly active (isolates were >99% susceptible) against S. aureus (including methicillin-resistant S. aureus), coagulase-negative staphylococci, Enterococcus faecalis, streptococci, and non-extended-spectrum β-lactamase (non-ESBL) phenotype Enterobacteriaceae. As expected, lower activities were observed against Enterococcus faecium, ESBL-phenotype Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii. These results support further clinical evaluation of ceftobiprole for the treatment of BSIs caused by susceptible organisms.

Ceftobiprole Activity against Gram-Positive and -Negative Pathogens Collected from the United States in 2006 and 2016

Ceftobiprole is an advanced cephalosporin with potent activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria that has been approved in many European and non-European countries to treat community- and hospital-acquired pneumonia (excluding ventilator-associated pneumonia). This study reports on the activity of ceftobiprole against a large set of clinical isolates obtained from hospitalized patients in the United States in 2016 that caused serious infections, including pneumonia, bacteremia, and skin and skin structure infections. To assess any potential temporal changes in ceftobiprole activity, the 2016 results were compared to corresponding MIC data from a 2006 U.S. survey that included key target pathogens. Ceftobiprole exhibited potent activity against Staphylococcus aureus (including methicillin-resistant S. aureus isolates, which were 99.3% susceptible), coagulase-negative staphylococci (100% susceptible), Enterococcus faecalis (100% susceptible), Streptococcus pneumoniae (99.7% susceptible), and other tested streptococci. Similarly, ceftobiprole was highly active against Enterobacteriaceae isolates that did not exhibit an extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) phenotype, including Escherichia coli (99.8% susceptible) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (99.6% susceptible). A total of 99.6% of all Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis isolates were inhibited at ≤1 mg/liter ceftobiprole, and 72.7% of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates were susceptible to ceftobiprole. With the exception of decreased cephalosporin susceptibility among Enterobacteriaceae isolates, which correlates with an increased prevalence of ESBL-producing isolates, ceftobiprole had similar activities against the isolate sets collected in 2006 and 2016. Therefore, ceftobiprole remains highly active when tested in vitro against a large number of current Gram-positive or Gram-negative pathogens that cause serious infections.

Antimicrobial activity of ceftobiprole and comparator agents when tested against contemporary Gram-positive and -negative organisms collected from Europe (2015)

Susceptibility testing of ceftobiprole and comparators against 12,240 isolates was performed following CLSI/EUCAST guidelines. The percentage of susceptible MRSA isolates was higher for ceftobiprole (96.5% susceptible) than for ceftaroline (86.2% susceptible). Both ceftobiprole (MIC_50/90, 0.5/2 mg/L) and ceftaroline (MIC_50/90, 0.25/1 mg/L) demonstrated potent activity against coagulase-negative staphylococci. Ceftobiprole demonstrated good potency against Enterococcus faecalis (MIC_50/90 values of 0.5/2 mg/L); ceftaroline (MIC_50/90, 2/8 mg/L) was 4-fold less active against these strains. Ceftobiprole activity was comparable to that of the other β-lactam agents tested against S. pneumoniae (MIC_90, 0.5 mg/L vs 0.12-2 mg/L [other β-lactams]), viridans-group streptococci (MIC₉₀,0.25 mg/L vs 0.006-1 mg/L [other β-lactams]), and β-hemolytic streptococci (MIC_90,0.03 mg/L vs 0.015-0.06 mg/L [other β-lactams]). Overall, 73.8% of Enterobacteriaceae isolates tested were susceptible to ceftobiprole. Ceftobiprole inhibited 70.4% of P. aeruginosa at ≤4 mg/L and all isolates of Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis at ≤ 0.5 mg/L. Ceftobiprole was active in vitro against a broad range of clinically-relevant contemporary Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial isolates.

Infections Caused by Antimicrobial Drug-Resistant Saprophytic Gram-Negative Bacteria in the Environment

Background

Drug-resistance genes found in human bacterial pathogens are increasingly recognized in saprophytic Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) from environmental sources. The clinical implication of such environmental GNBs is unknown.

Objectives

We conducted a systematic review to determine how often such saprophytic GNBs cause human infections.

Methods

We queried PubMed for articles published in English, Spanish, and French between January 2006 and July 2014 for 20 common environmental saprophytic GNB species, using search terms “infections,” “human infections,” “hospital infection.” We analyzed 251 of 1,275 non-duplicate publications that satisfied our selection criteria. Saprophytes implicated in blood stream infection (BSI), urinary tract infection (UTI), skin and soft tissue infection (SSTI), post-surgical infection (PSI), osteomyelitis (Osteo), and pneumonia (PNA) were quantitatively assessed.

Results

Thirteen of the 20 queried GNB saprophytic species were implicated in 674 distinct infection episodes from 45 countries. The most common species included Enterobacter aerogenes, Pantoea agglomerans, and Pseudomonas putida. Of these infections, 443 (66%) had BSI, 48 (7%) had SSTI, 36 (5%) had UTI, 28 (4%) had PSI, 21 (3%) had PNA, 16 (3%) had Osteo, and 82 (12%) had other infections. Nearly all infections occurred in subjects with comorbidities. Resistant strains harbored extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL), carbapenemase, and metallo-β-lactamase genes recognized in human pathogens.

Conclusion

These observations show that saprophytic GNB organisms that harbor recognized drug-resistance genes cause a wide spectrum of infections, especially as opportunistic pathogens. Such GNB saprophytes may become increasingly more common in healthcare settings, as has already been observed with other environmental GNBs such as Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Pharmacokinetic drug evaluation of ceftobiprole for the treatment of MRSA

INTRODUCTION

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), while decreasing in overall incidence, is still a prominent concern world-wide. New agents coming to market in the last 10 years allow practitioners to optimize treatment for MRSA infections. Ceftobiprole is a cephalosporin agent with MRSA activity, currently approved in selected countries for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia and hospital-acquired pneumonia. Areas covered: Relevant literature regarding spectrum of activity, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and clinical trials will be discussed. Expert opinion: Ceftobiprole is an addition to a growing number of antimicrobials with activity against MRSA. Concern for appropriate dosing in critically ill patients remains due to its ineffectiveness for the treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). While ceftobiprole has activity against gram-negative organisms, the allowance for use of an additional agent for gram-negative infections in clinical trials limits recommendations for monotherapy for empirical treatment of HAP. Ceftobiprole's place in therapy will lie in its activity against gram positive organisms, such as Streptococcus spp. and Staphylococcus spp.

New therapeutic options for respiratory tract infections

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The progressive increase of respiratory tract infections caused by multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) has been associated with delays in the prescription of an adequate antibiotic treatment and increased mortality, representing a major concern in both community and hospital settings. When infections because of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) are suspected, vancomycin still represents the first choice, although its efficacy has been recently questioned in favor of new drugs, reported to provide better clinical outcomes. Moreover, few therapeutic options are currently available for the treatment of severe infections caused by Multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative pathogens, which are frequently resistant to all the available β-lactams, including carbapenems. We have reviewed the therapeutic options for the treatment of respiratory tract infections that have recently become available with promising implications for clinical practice, including ceftaroline, ceftrobiprole, tedizolid, telavancin, delafloxacin, eravacycline, and new β-lactams/β-lactamase inhibitors.

RECENT FINDINGS

A number of new antimicrobials with activity against MDROs have been recently approved for the treatment of respiratory tract infections, and other agents are under investigation. Recent developments, with a specific focus on the possible advantages of new drugs for the management of respiratory tract infections caused by MDROs in everyday clinical practice are discussed.

SUMMARY

Newly approved and investigational drugs for the treatment of respiratory tract infections are expected to offer many advantages for the management of patients with suspected or confirmed infections caused by MDROs. Most promising features among new compounds include the broad spectrum of activity against both MRSA and MDR Gram-negative bacteria, a limited risk of antimicrobial resistance, the availability of oral formulations, and a promising safety profile.

New antibiotics and antimicrobial combination therapy for the treatment of gram-negative bacterial infections

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Increasing rates of life-threatening infections due to multidrug-resistant (MDR) gram-negative bacteria, such as carbapenemase-producer strains, as well as pathogens that are resistant to all current therapeutic options, have been reported. The number of compounds that are currently being developed is still insufficient to control this global threat. We have reviewed the current available options for the treatment of MDR gram-negative infections, including combination regimens employing older antimicrobials and new compounds.

RECENT FINDINGS

A limited number of large trials have assessed the treatment options for commonly encountered resistant pathogens (e.g., Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumanii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa). Antimicrobials that were used in the past, such as colistin and fosfomycin, have been recently resumed and used in association with carbapenems, tigecycline, or aminoglycosides, showing a positive impact on clinical outcomes. New compounds belonging to various antimicrobial classes (e.g. beta-lactamase inhibitors, cephalosporins, glycyclines, aminoglycosides) have been investigated.

SUMMARY

Only few new molecules have an adequate activity against MDR gram-negative pathogens, especially carbapenemase-producer strains. Among these, ceftozolane/tazobactam has been recently approved for clinical use. Other compounds, such as avibactam combinations, plazomicin, and eravacycline, have shown promising activity in phase 2 and 3 clinical trials.

Safety profiles of old and new antimicrobials for the treatment of MRSA infections

INTRODUCTION

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a frequent cause of severe nosocomial and community-acquired infections. Various adverse effects have been associated with compounds that are commonly used in the treatment of MRSA.

AREAS COVERED

Prolonged use of high-dose vancomycin has been linked with nephrotoxicity. Linezolid use has been associated with lactic acidosis in regimens longer than 14 days and occurrence of thrombocytopenia in patients with renal impairment. Daptomycin use correlates with reversible and often asymptomatic myopathy. Among new compounds, telavancin has shown increased toxicity compared to vancomycin, especially in patients with severe renal impairment, while a low rate of adverse effects was reported others glycolipopeptides such as dalbavancin and oritavancin and for new cephalosporins. Recently studied oxazolidinones (tedizolid and radezolid) also showed mild adverse effects in Phase 2 and 3 clinical trials.

EXPERT OPINION

Due to the constant increase in antimicrobial resistance, the use of higher doses and prolonged regimens of antibiotics employed in the treatment of Gram-positive infections has become more common and linked to increased toxicity. Furthermore, new compounds with MRSA activity have been recently approved and will be regularly employed in clinical practice. The knowledge of the adverse effects and risk factors for the development of toxicity associated with anti-MRSA antimicrobials is paramount for the correct use of old and new compounds, especially in the treatment of severe infections.

Genotypic Characterization of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Recovered at Baseline from Phase 3 Pneumonia Clinical Trials for Ceftobiprole

Baseline methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates from patients with nosocomial and community-acquired pneumonia collected during Phase 3 trials for ceftobiprole were characterized. Eighty-four unique isolates from patients enrolled in Europe (50.0%), Asia-Western Pacific region (APAC; 20.2%), North America (19.0%), Latin America (8.3%), and South Africa (2.4%) were included. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed by broth microdilution and isolates screened for Panton-Valentine leukocidin. SCCmec and agr types were determined. Strains were subjected to pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and spa typing. Clonal complexes (CCs) were assigned based on spa and/or multilocus sequence typing. Most isolates were CC5-MRSA-I/II/IV (44.0%; 37/84), followed by CC8-MRSA-IV (22.6%; 19/84) and CC239-MRSA-III (21.4%; 18/84). Other MRSA formed seven clonal clusters. Isolates from North America were associated with USA100, while those from South America belonged to the Cordobes/Chilean CC. A greater clonal diversity was observed in Europe; however, each country had CC5, CC8, or CC239 as prevalent lineages. Isolates from APAC were CC5-MRSA-II (47.1%; 8/17) or CC239-MRSA-III (47.1%; 8/17). Isolates carrying SCCmec I and III had ceftobiprole MIC₅₀ values of 2 μg/ml, while those isolates with SCCmec II and IV had MIC₅₀ values of 1 μg/ml. Ceftobiprole inhibited 96% and 100.0% of the isolates at ≤2 and ≤4 μg/ml, respectively. These isolates represented common circulating MRSA clones. Ceftobiprole demonstrated in vitro activity with a slight variation of minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) according to SCCmec or clonal type.

Development of novel antibacterial drugs to combat multiple resistant organisms

BACKGROUND

Infections due to multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria are increasing both in hospitals and in the community and are characterized by high mortality rates. New molecules are in development to face the need of active compounds toward resistant gram-positive and gram-negative pathogens. In particular, the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) has supported the initiative to develop ten new antibacterials within 2020. Principal targets are the so-called ESKAPE pathogens (Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumanii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterobacteriaceae).

PURPOSE

To review the characteristics and the status of development of new antimicrobials including new cephalosporins, carbapenems, beta-lactamase inhibitors, aminoglycosides, quinolones, oxazolidones, glycopeptides, and tetracyclines.

CONCLUSIONS

While numerous new compounds target resistant gram-positive pathogens and have been approved for clinical use, very few new molecules are active against MDR gram-negative pathogens, especially carbapenemase producers. New glycopeptides and oxazolidinones are highly efficient against methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), and new cephalosporins and carbapenems also display activity toward MDR gram-positive bacteria. Although new cephalosporins and carbapenems have acquired activity against MRSA, they offer few advantages against difficult-to-treat gram-negatives. Among agents that are potentially active against MDR gram-negatives are ceftozolane/tazobactam, new carbapenems, the combination of avibactam with ceftazidime, and plazomicin. Since a relevant number of promising antibiotics is currently in development, regulatory approvals over the next 5 years are crucial to face the growing threat of multidrug resistance.

Coagulase-negative staphylococci

The definition of the heterogeneous group of coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) is still based on diagnostic procedures that fulfill the clinical need to differentiate between Staphylococcus aureus and those staphylococci classified historically as being less or nonpathogenic. Due to patient- and procedure-related changes, CoNS now represent one of the major nosocomial pathogens, with S. epidermidis and S. haemolyticus being the most significant species. They account substantially for foreign body-related infections and infections in preterm newborns. While S. saprophyticus has been associated with acute urethritis, S. lugdunensis has a unique status, in some aspects resembling S. aureus in causing infectious endocarditis. In addition to CoNS found as food-associated saprophytes, many other CoNS species colonize the skin and mucous membranes of humans and animals and are less frequently involved in clinically manifested infections. This blurred gradation in terms of pathogenicity is reflected by species- and strain-specific virulence factors and the development of different host-defending strategies. Clearly, CoNS possess fewer virulence properties than S. aureus, with a respectively different disease spectrum. In this regard, host susceptibility is much more important. Therapeutically, CoNS are challenging due to the large proportion of methicillin-resistant strains and increasing numbers of isolates with less susceptibility to glycopeptides.

New antibiotics for bad bugs: where are we?

Bacterial resistance to antibiotics is growing up day by day in both community and hospital setting, with a significant impact on the mortality and morbidity rates and the financial burden that is associated. In the last two decades multi drug resistant microorganisms (both hospital- and community-acquired) challenged the scientific groups into developing new antimicrobial compounds that can provide safety in use according to the new regulation, good efficacy patterns, and low resistance profile. In this review we made an evaluation of present data regarding the new classes and the new molecules from already existing classes of antibiotics and the ongoing trends in antimicrobial development. Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) supported a proGram, called “the ′10 × ´20′ initiative”, to develop ten new systemic antibacterial drugs within 2020. The microorganisms mainly involved in the resistance process, so called the ESKAPE pathogens (Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumanii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and enterobacteriaceae) were the main targets. In the era of antimicrobial resistance the new antimicrobial agents like fifth generation cephalosporins, carbapenems, monobactams, β-lactamases inhibitors, aminoglycosides, quinolones, oxazolidones, glycopeptides, and tetracyclines active against Gram-positive pathogens, like vancomycin-resistant S. aureus (VRSA) and MRSA, penicillin-resistant streptococci, and vancomycin resistant Enterococcus (VRE) but also against highly resistant Gram-negative organisms are more than welcome. Of these compounds some are already approved by official agencies, some are still in study, but the need of new antibiotics still does not cover the increasing prevalence of antibiotic-resistant bacterial infections. Therefore the management of antimicrobial resistance should also include fostering coordinated actions by all stakeholders, creating policy guidance, support for surveillance and technical assistance.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics evaluation of ceftobiprole medocaril for the treatment of hospital-acquired pneumonia

INTRODUCTION

Ceftobiprole is a cephalosporin with activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Enterobacteriaceae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa with a promising role in the treatment of hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP). Cure rates, however, with ceftobiprole at the doses studied may be inferior to conventional treatment in the ventilator-acquired subset of HAP.

AREAS COVERED

Literature was sought using PubMed and through abstracts from the Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (2006 - 2012) and the European Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (2007 - 2012). The authors used the search terms "ceftobiprole," "BAL9141," "RO63-9141," "BAL5788," and 'RO5788." The article discusses the activity, mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and clinical trials of ceftobiprole in HAP. The article also provides discussion of how PK/PD parameters play a role in the outcome of HAP treatment and how dosing in ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) should be reconsidered in light of altered PK/PD.

EXPERT OPINION

In patients with normal PK and non-VAP, ceftobiprole is effective for the treatment of HAP in the recommended doses, ceftobiprole is unlikely to achieve the desired PD targets when PK parameters are altered in VAP (e.g., increased volume of distribution and clearance). In these settings, off-label use at higher doses may overcome these limitations; but in the presence of alternative therapies, it cannot be currently recommended.

Decreased susceptibility to noncarbapenem antimicrobials in extended-spectrum-β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates in Toronto, Canada

Retrospective review from 11 Canadian hospitals showed increasing incidence of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae from 0.12 per 1,000 inpatient days during 2005 to 0.47 per 1,000 inpatient days during 2009. By 2009, susceptibility rates of ESBL-positive E. coli/K. pneumoniae were as follows: ciprofloxacin, 12.8%/9.0%; TMP/SMX, 32.9%/12.2%; and nitrofurantoin, 83.8%/10.3%. Nosocomial and nonnosocomial ESBL-producing E. coli isolates had similar susceptibility profiles, while nonnosocomial ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae was associated with decreased ciprofloxacin (P = 0.03) and nitrofurantoin (P < 0.001) susceptibilities.