Inhibitory activity of avibactam against selected β-lactamases expressed in an isogenic Escherichia coli strain

The primary pharmacology of ceftazidime/avibactam: in vitro translational biology

Previous reviews of ceftazidime/avibactam have focused on in vitro molecular enzymology and microbiology or the clinically associated properties of the combination. Here we take a different approach. We initiate a series of linked reviews that analyse research on the combination that built the primary pharmacology data required to support the clinical and business risk decisions to perform randomized controlled Phase 3 clinical trials, and the additional microbiological research that was added to the above, and the safety and chemical manufacturing and controls data, that constituted successful regulatory licensing applications for ceftazidime/avibactam in multiple countries, including the USA and the EU. The aim of the series is to provide both a source of reference for clinicians and microbiologists to be able to use ceftazidime/avibactam to its best advantage for patients, but also a case study of bringing a novel β-lactamase inhibitor (in combination with an established β-lactam) through the microbiological aspects of clinical development and regulatory applications, updated finally with a review of resistance occurring in patients under treatment. This first article reviews the biochemistry, structural biology and basic microbiology of the combination, showing that avibactam inhibits the great majority of serine-dependent β-lactamases in Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa to restore the in vitro antibacterial activity of ceftazidime. Translation to efficacy against infections in vivo is reviewed in the second co-published article, Nichols et al. (J Antimicrob Chemother 2022; dkac172).

Structural and Biochemical Characterization of the Novel CTX-M-151 Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase and Its Inhibition by Avibactam

The diazabicyclooctane (DBO) inhibitor avibactam (AVI) reversibly inactivates most serine β-lactamases, including the CTX-M β-lactamases. Currently, more than 230 unique CTX-M members distributed in five clusters with less than 5% amino acid sequence divergence within each group have been described. Recently, a variant named CTX-M-151 was isolated from a Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Choleraesuis strain in Japan. This variant possesses a low degree of amino acid identity with the other CTX-Ms (63.2% to 69.7% with respect to the mature proteins), and thus it may represent a new subgroup within the family. CTX-M-151 hydrolyzes ceftriaxone better than ceftazidime (k _cat/K _m values 6,000-fold higher), as observed with CTX-Ms. CTX-M-151 is well inhibited by mechanism-based inhibitors like clavulanic acid (inactivation rate [k _inact]/inhibition constant [K_i ] = 0.15 μM^-1 · s^-1). For AVI, the apparent inhibition constant (K_{i app}), 0.4 μM, was comparable to that of KPC-2; the acylation rate (k₂/K) (37,000 M^-1 · s^-1) was lower than that for CTX-M-15, while the deacylation rate (k _off) (0.0015 s^-1) was 2- to 14-fold higher than those of other class A β-lactamases. The structure of the CTX-M-151/AVI complex (1.32 Å) reveals that AVI adopts a chair conformation with hydrogen bonds between the AVI carbamate and Ser70 and Ser237 at the oxyanion hole. Upon acylation, the side chain of Lys73 points toward Ser130, which is associated with the protonation of Glu166, supporting the role of Lys73 in the proton relay pathway and Glu166 as the general base in deacylation. To our knowledge, this is the first chromosomally encoded CTX-M in Salmonella Choleraesuis that shows similar hydrolytic preference toward cefotaxime (CTX) and ceftriaxone (CRO) to that toward ceftazidime (CAZ).

In vitro activity of aztreonam/avibactam against a global collection of Klebsiella pneumoniae collected from defined culture sources in 2016 and 2017

OBJECTIVES

This study reports on the activity of aztreonam/avibactam (ATM-AVI) against a collection of Klebsiella pneumoniae collected in 2016 and 2017.

METHODS

Non-duplicate K. pneumoniae isolates were collected from four regions (Africa/Middle East, n = 785; Asia-Pacific, n = 1433; Europe, n = 4236; Latin America, n = 1499) and five culture sources (blood, n = 902; intra-abdominal, n = 992; urinary tract, n = 2148; skin and skin structure, n = 1409; lower respiratory tract, n = 2502). MICs were determined at a central laboratory using Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) broth microdilution methodology. Susceptibility was determined using European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) breakpoints.

RESULTS

For all culture sources, against all K. pneumoniae, the highest rates of susceptibility were seen for amikacin (>84%), ceftazidime/avibactam (>94%), colistin (>92%) and meropenem (>83%), and >99.9% of isolates were inhibited at an ATM-AVI MIC of ≤4 mg/L. Among meropenem-resistant (MEM-R, n = 583) and meropenem-resistant metallo-β-lactamase-negative (MEM-R-MBLN; n = 469) isolates, susceptibility was highest to ceftazidime/avibactam (79.9% and 99.4%, respectively) and colistin (67.2% and 62.7%, respectively). All MEM-R-MBLN isolates from blood, intra-abdominal, urinary tract and skin and skin structure sources, and all but one isolate from respiratory sources, were inhibited at an ATM-AVI MIC of ≤2 mg/L. Against the meropenem-resistant metallo-β-lactamase positive (MEM-R-MBLP; n = 114) isolates, susceptibility to colistin was between 75.0% (urinary tract isolates) and 93.3% (lower respiratory tract isolates). All MEM-R-MBLP isolates were inhibited at an ATM-AVI MIC of ≤0.5 mg/L.

CONCLUSIONS

ATM-AVI is active against K. pneumoniae isolates from a range of culture sources across Africa/Middle East, Asia-Pacific, Europe and Latin America. ATM-AVI also has activity against MEM-R-MBLN and MEM-R-MBLP isolates.

Synergistic Activity of Colistin in Combination With Resveratrol Against Colistin-Resistant Gram-Negative Pathogens

Objectives: In this study, we investigated the antimicrobial activity of resveratrol in combination with colistin, a last-resort agent for the treatment of severe infections caused by multidrug resistant Gram-negative pathogens. Methods: The synergistic activity and the bactericidal activity of colistin in combination with resveratrol was investigated by checkerboard assays and time-kill assays, respectively. A total of 21 strains were investigated, including 16 strains of different species (Klebsiella pneumoniae, n = 6, Escherichia coli, n = 6; Citrobacter braakii, n = 1; Stenotrophomonas malthophilia, n = 1; Enterobacter cloaceae, n = 1; Acinetobacter baumannii, n = 1) with acquired colistin resistance, three colistin-susceptible K. pneumoniae precursors, and two strains of intrinsically colistin-resistant species (Serratia marcescens, n = 1; Proteus mirabilis, n = 1). Mechanisms of acquired colistin resistance included chromosomal mutations (i.e., mgrB, pmrAB) and plasmid genes (mcr-1, mcr-1.2). Results: Resveratrol did not show any significant intrinsic antimicrobial activity. Overall, a relevant synergistic antimicrobial activity of resveratrol in combination with colistin was observed with all tested strains, except for the three colistin-susceptible K. pneumoniae strains, and for two mcr-1-positive E. coli strains. In time-kill assays, performed with 15 selected strains, the combination of colistin 2 mg/L plus resveratrol 128 mg/L was bactericidal with 11 strains, and bacteriostatic for the remaining ones. Conclusions: Resveratrol was found to potentiate colistin activity against a wide panel of colistin-resistant strains, regardless of species and resistance mechanisms, which would deserve further investigation for potential clinical applications.

Defining Substrate Specificity in the CTX-M Family: the Role of Asp240 in Ceftazidime Hydrolysis

The natural diversification of CTX-M β-lactamases led to the emergence of Asp240Gly variants in the clinic that confer reduced susceptibility to ceftazidime (CAZ). In this study, we compared the impact of this substitution on CAZ and ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) MICs against isogenic Escherichia coli strains with different porin deficiencies. Our results show a noticeable increase in CAZ resistance in clones expressing Asp240Gly-harboring CTX-M when combined with OmpF porin deficiency. Kinetic analysis revealed that the k_cat/K_m for CAZ was 5- to 15-fold higher for all Asp240Gly variants but remained 200- to 725-fold lower than that for cefotaxime (CTX). In vitro selection of CAZ-resistant clones yielded nonsusceptible CTX-M producers (MIC of >16 μg/ml) only after overnight incubation; the addition of avibactam (AVI) decreased MICs to a susceptible range against these variants. In contrast, the use of CZA as a selective agent did not yield resistant clones. AVI inactivated both CTX-M-12 and CTX-M-96, with an apparent inhibition constant comparable to that of SHV-2 and 1,000-fold greater than that of PER-2 and CMY-2, and k₂/K for CTX-M-12 was 24- and 35-fold higher than that for CTX-M-96 and CTX-M-15, respectively. Molecular modeling suggests that AVI interacts similarly with CTX-M-96 and CTX-M-15. We conclude that the impact of Asp240Gly in resistance may arise when other mechanisms are also present (i.e., OmpF deficiency). Additionally, CAZ selection could favor the emergence of CAZ-resistant subpopulations. These results define the role of Asp240 and the impact of the -Gly substitution and allow us to hypothesize that the use of CZA is an effective preventive strategy to delay the development of resistance in this family of extended-spectrum β-lactamases.

Efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam in a rat intra-abdominal abscess model against a ceftazidime- and meropenem-resistant isolate of Klebsiella pneumoniae carrying blaKPC-2

Efficacies of ceftazidime-avibactam (4:1 w/w) and ceftazidime were tested against ceftazidime-susceptible (bla_KPC-2-negative), and meropenem- and ceftazidime-resistant (bla_KPC-2-positive), Klebsiella pneumoniae in a 52-h, multiple dose, abdominal abscess model in the rat. Efficacies corresponded to minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) measured in vitro and were consistent with drug exposures modelled from pharmacokinetics in infected animals. The ceftazidime, ceftazidime-avibactam and meropenem control treatments were effective in the rat abscess model against the susceptible strain, whereas only ceftazidime-avibactam was effective against K. pneumoniae harbouring bla_KPC-2.

In Vitro Activity of Aztreonam-Avibactam against Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolated by Clinical Laboratories in 40 Countries from 2012 to 2015

The combination of the monobactam aztreonam and the non-β-lactam β-lactamase inhibitor avibactam is currently in clinical development for the treatment of serious infections caused by metallo-β-lactamase (MBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae, a difficult-to-treat subtype of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae for which therapeutic options are currently very limited. The present study tested clinically significant isolates of Enterobacteriaceae (n = 51,352) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 11,842) collected from hospitalized patients in 208 medical center laboratories from 40 countries from 2012 to 2015 for in vitro susceptibility to aztreonam-avibactam, aztreonam, and comparator antimicrobial agents using a standard broth microdilution methodology. Avibactam was tested at a fixed concentration of 4 μg/ml in combination with 2-fold dilutions of aztreonam. The MIC90s of aztreonam-avibactam and aztreonam were 0.12 and 64 μg/ml, respectively, for all Enterobacteriaceae isolates; >99.9% of all isolates and 99.8% of meropenem-nonsusceptible isolates (n = 1,498) were inhibited by aztreonam-avibactam at a concentration of ≤8 μg/ml. PCR and DNA sequencing identified 267 Enterobacteriaceae isolates positive for MBL genes (NDM, VIM, IMP); all Enterobacteriaceae carrying MBLs demonstrated aztreonam-avibactam MICs of ≤8 μg/ml and a MIC90 of 1 μg/ml. Against all P. aeruginosa isolates tested, the MIC90 of both aztreonam-avibactam and aztreonam was 32 μg/ml; against MBL-positive P. aeruginosa isolates (n = 452), MIC90 values for aztreonam-avibactam and aztreonam were 32 and 64 μg/ml, respectively. The current study demonstrated that aztreonam-avibactam possesses potent in vitro activity against a recent, sizeable global collection of Enterobacteriaceae clinical isolates, including isolates that were meropenem nonsusceptible, and against MBL-positive isolates of Enterobacteriaceae, for which there are few treatment options.

Inhibition by Avibactam and Clavulanate of the β-Lactamases KPC-2 and CTX-M-15 Harboring the Substitution N132G in the Conserved SDN Motif

The substitution N132G in the SDN motif of class A β-lactamases from rapidly growing mycobacteria was previously shown to impair their inhibition by avibactam but to improve the stability of acyl-enzymes formed with clavulanate. The same substitution was introduced in KPC-2 and CTX-M-15 to assess its impact on β-lactamases from Enterobacteriaceae and evaluate whether it may lead to resistance to the ceftazidime-avibactam combination. Kinetic parameters for the inhibition of the β-lactamases by avibactam and clavulanate were determined by spectrophotometry using nitrocefin as the substrate. The substitution N132G impaired (>1,000-fold) the efficacy of carbamylation of KPC-2 and CTX-M-15 by avibactam. The substitution improved the inhibition of KPC-2 by clavulanate due to reduced deacylation, whereas the presence or absence of N132G resulted in the inhibition of CTX-M-15 by clavulanate. The hydrolysis of amoxicillin and nitrocefin by KPC-2 and CTX-M-15 was moderately affected by the substitution N132G, but that of ceftazidime, ceftaroline, and aztreonam was drastically reduced. Isogenic strains producing KPC-2 and CTX-M-15 were constructed to assess the impact of the substitution N132G on the antibacterial activities of β-lactam-inhibitor combinations. For amoxicillin, the substitution resulted in resistance and susceptibility for avibactam and clavulanate, respectively. For ceftazidime, ceftaroline, and aztreonam, the negative impact of the substitution on β-lactamase activity prevented resistance to the β-lactam-avibactam combinations. In conclusion, the N132G substitution has profound effects on the substrate and inhibition profiles of class A β-lactamases, which are largely conserved in distantly related enzymes. Fortunately, the substitution does not lead to resistance to the ceftazidime-avibactam combination.