Multi-center and multi-method evaluation of in vitro activities of ceftaroline against S. aureus

Comparison of Etest and broth microdilution for evaluating the susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pneumoniae to ceftaroline and of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa to ceftazidime/avibactam

OBJECTIVES

Decreased susceptibility to ceftazidime/avibactam (CZA) and ceftaroline (CPT) has been reported during antimicrobial resistance surveillance and therapy. Conventional laboratories are unable to provide timely susceptibility testing for CZA and CPT because these antimicrobial agents are not incorporated in automated susceptibility testing systems.

METHODS

We evaluated Etest and the Sensititre broth microdilution (BMD) method for testing CZA against carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacilli and CPT against important Gram-positive cocci bloodstream isolates. Genotypes of carbapenemases in Enterobacterales were also determined using the Xpert® Carba-R assay.

RESULTS

Etest showed ≥90% agreement with Sensititre BMD for carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) (n = 187), carbapenem-resistant Escherichia coli (CREC) (n = 28) and Streptococcus pneumoniae (n = 35); however, the very major error rate exceeded 3%. Agreement between Etest and Sensititre BMD was <90% for carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) (n = 81), methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) (n = 92) and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) (n = 170). Both agents remained potent with a high susceptibility rate by Sensititre BMD as follows: CZA against CRKP (95.0%), CREC (89.3%) and CRPA (84.5%); and CPT against MSSA (100.0%), MRSA (95.3%) and S. pneumoniae (94.3%). CZA was active against blaKPC-carrying CRKP (98.5% susceptible), and resistance in the majority of CZA-resistant Enterobacterales isolates (6 of 10 CRKP and 2 of 3 CREC) was due to the presence of a metallo-β-lactamase gene.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that interpretation of susceptibility results obtained by Etest for both agents should be undertaken cautiously and remains challenging.

Clinical Trial Assessment Principles of National Class III Medical Devices in China

Class III medical devices are defined as those which are implanted inside the human body and applied to maintain normal life and retain original tissue or organic functions. Because these devices are associated with high risk, their effectiveness and safety should be strictly monitored and clinically investigated. The aim of clinical investigation of these medical devices is to ensure the acceptability of their effectiveness and safety levels. On designing the clinical trial, the investigator should determine the indices to assess the effectiveness and safety of medical devices, select reasonable data‐analyzing methods, and pay attention to several other issues. Although some guidelines on specific class III medical devices have illustrated those aspects in detail, there is still no comprehensive report that details all those principles and methodologies. This article aims to summarize the common features among the instruction principles and provide technological support for the clinical study of class III medical devices.

In vitro activity of ceftaroline and ceftobiprole against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with decreased susceptibility to vancomycin isolated in paediatric patients

Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC, mg/l) of ceftaroline and ceftobiprole were evaluated over 70 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains with vancomycin MIC ≥1 isolated in a paediatric hospital. The proportion of non-wild-type strains (MIC > epidemiological cut off) was 18% for ceftobiprole and 64% for ceftaroline. Only 1.4% of strains was resistant to ceftobiprole, and none to ceftaroline. These results are worrisome, since show the presence of non-negligible proportions of MRSA strains with high MIC values for ceftaroline and ceftobiprole in a setting where both drugs were never used.

Etest® versus broth microdilution for ceftaroline MIC determination with Staphylococcus aureus: results from PREMIUM, a European multicentre study

OBJECTIVES

To compare the concordance of ceftaroline MIC values by reference broth microdilution (BMD) and Etest (bioMérieux, France) for MSSA and MRSA isolates obtained from PREMIUM (D372SL00001), a European multicentre study.

METHODS

Ceftaroline MICs were determined by reference BMD and by Etest for 1242 MSSA and MRSA isolates collected between February and May 2012 from adult patients with community-acquired pneumonia or complicated skin and soft tissue infections; tests were performed across six European laboratories. Selected isolates with ceftaroline resistance in broth (MIC >1 mg/L) were retested in three central laboratories to confirm their behaviour.

RESULTS

Overall concordance between BMD and Etest was good, with >97% essential agreement and >95% categorical agreement. Nevertheless, 12 of the 26 MRSA isolates found resistant by BMD scored as susceptible by Etest, with MICs ≤1 mg/L, thus counting as very major errors, whereas only 5 of 380 MRSA isolates found ceftaroline susceptible in BMD were miscategorized as resistant by Etest. Twenty-one of the 26 isolates with MICs of 2 mg/L by BMD were then retested twice by each of three central laboratories: BMD MICs of 2 mg/L were consistently found for 19 of the 21 isolates. Among 147 Etest results for these 21 isolates (original plus six repeats per isolate) 112 were >1 mg/L.

CONCLUSIONS

BMD and Etest have good overall agreement for ceftaroline against Staphylococcus aureus; nevertheless, reliable Etest-based discrimination of the minority of ceftaroline-resistant (MIC 2 mg/L) MRSA is extremely challenging, requiring careful reading of strips, ideally with duplicate testing.