Hepatitis C virus treatment in people who inject drugs (PWID) in Bangladesh

Barriers to Hepatitis C Treatment and Interest in Telemedicine-Based Care Among Clients of a Syringe Access Program

Background

Sharing equipment for injection drug use is the most common mode of hepatitis C virus (HCV) transmission in the United States, yet people who inject drugs (PWID) historically have low rates of HCV treatment. New strategies are needed to expand access to HCV treatment among PWID. Co-locating HCV treatment at syringe access programs (SAPs) reduces barriers to treatment, and telemedicine-based treatment programs could expand access further.

Methods

To evaluate interest in a co-localized or telemedicine-based program at an SAP in Denver, Colorado, we surveyed 171 SAP clients to understand barriers to HCV treatment and comfort with various appointment modalities.

Results

Eighty-nine of the surveyed SAP clients (52%), 50 of whom had not completed treatment, reported current or prior HCV infection. The most commonly cited reasons for not seeking HCV treatment were ongoing drug use, logistic barriers, and medical system barriers. Eighty-eight percent of clients with HCV reported that they would be more likely to get treatment if they were able to do so at the SAP, and the rate was higher among people who reported reluctance to seek medical care in general (98% vs 77%, P = .011). In-person appointments were preferred, though 77% of respondents were comfortable with a video appointment. However, only 60% of SAP clients reported having access to a phone, and fewer (48%) had access to video capability.

Conclusions

These findings suggest that telemedicine-based treatment at an SAP could improve access to HCV treatment, but successful implementation would require attention to barriers impacting clients' ability to participate in telemedicine appointments.

Predictors of hepatitis C cure among people who inject drugs treated with directly observed therapy supported by peer case managers in Kenya

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Directly observed therapy (DOT) maximizes adherence and minimizes treatment gaps. Peer case managers (PCM) have also shown promise as a component of integrated HCV treatment strategies. DOT and PCM-support have been underexplored, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The objective of this study was to evaluate predictors of sustained virologic response (SVR) among people who inject drugs (PWID) attending medication-assisted treatment (MAT) and needle and syringe programs (NSP) sites in Kenya.

METHODS

We recruited PWID accessing MAT and NSP in Nairobi and Coastal Kenya. PWID were treated with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir using DOT supported by PCMs. We used bivariate and multivariate logistic regression to examine the impact of sociodemographic, behavioral, and clinical factors on SVR.

RESULTS

Among 92 PWID who initiated HCV treatment, 79 (86%) were male with mean age of 36.3 years (SD=±6.5); 38 (41%) were HIV-positive, and 87 (95%) reported injecting drugs in the last 30 days. Just over half of participants were genotype 1a (55%), followed by genotype 4a (41%) and mixed 1a/4a (3%). Most participants, 85 (92%) completed treatment and 79 (86%) achieved SVR. While sociodemographic and behavioral factors including recent injection drug use were not significantly associated with achieving SVR, being fully adherent (p=0.042), number of doses taken (p=0.008) and treatment completion (p= 0.001) were associated with higher odds of achieving SVR.

CONCLUSIONS

DOT with PCM-support was an effective model for HCV treatment among PWID in this LMIC setting. Adherence was the most important driver of SVR suggesting DOT and PCM support can overcome other factors that might limit adherence. Further research is necessary to ascertain the effectiveness of other models of HCV care for PWID in LMICs given NSP and MAT access is variable, and DOT may not be sustainable with limited resources.

Hepatitis C treatment outcomes among people who inject drugs accessing harm reduction settings in Kenya

Data are limited on HCV treatment outcomes among people who inject drugs (PWID) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and particularly sub-Saharan Africa. We provided ledipasvir/sofosbuvir under directly observed therapy (DOT) to 95 PWID accessing medication-assisted treatment (MAT) and needle and syringe programs (NSP) in Nairobi and Coastal Kenya. Participants were predominantly male (n=81, 85.3%), mean age of 36.5 years (SD=±6.5); 38 (40%) were HIV-positive, 12 (12.6%) were cirrhotic, and 87 (91.6%) reported injecting drugs in the last 30 days. Genotypes were 53 (55.8%) 1a, 39 (41.1%) 4a, and 3 (3.2%) 1a/4a. Among 92 who initiated treatment, 85 (92.4%) completed treatment and 79 (85.9%) achieved SVR. In conclusion, HCV treatment among PWID in an LMIC setting is feasible. Further research is necessary to ascertain optimal models of HCV care given NSP and MAT access is variable in LMICs, and DOT may not be sustainable with limited resources.

An intensive model of care for hepatitis C virus screening and treatment with direct-acting antivirals in people who inject drugs in Nairobi, Kenya: a model-based cost-effectiveness analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment is essential for eliminating HCV in people who inject drugs (PWID), but has limited coverage in resource-limited settings. We measured the cost-effectiveness of a pilot HCV screening and treatment intervention using directly observed therapy among PWID attending harm reduction services in Nairobi, Kenya.

DESIGN

We utilized an existing model of HIV and HCV transmission among current and former PWID in Nairobi to estimate the cost-effectiveness of screening and treatment for HCV, including prevention benefits versus no screening and treatment. The cure rate of treatment and costs for screening and treatment were estimated from intervention data, while other model parameters were derived from literature. Cost-effectiveness was evaluated over a life-time horizon from the health-care provider's perspective. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed.

SETTING

Nairobi, Kenya.

POPULATION

PWID.

MEASUREMENTS

Treatment costs, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (cost per disability-adjusted life year averted).

FINDINGS

The cost per disability-adjusted life-year averted for the intervention was $975, with 92.1% of the probabilistic sensitivity analyses simulations falling below the per capita gross domestic product for Kenya ($1509; commonly used as a suitable threshold for determining whether an intervention is cost-effective). However, the intervention was not cost-effective at the opportunity cost-based cost-effectiveness threshold of $647 per disability-adjusted life-year averted. Sensitivity analyses showed that the intervention could provide more value for money by including modelled estimates for HCV disease care costs, assuming lower drug prices ($75 instead of $728 per course) and excluding directly-observed therapy costs.

CONCLUSIONS

The current strategy of screening and treatment for hepatitis C virus (HCV) among people who inject drugs in Nairobi is likely to be highly cost-effective with currently available cheaper drug prices, if directly-observed therapy is not used and HCV disease care costs are accounted for.

The risk of hepatitis C virus recurrence in hepatitis C virus-infected patients treated with direct-acting antivirals after achieving a sustained virological response: A comprehensive analysis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The risk for hepatitis C virus (HCV) recurrence persists after HCV eradication with direct-acting antivirals (DAAs), particularly in patients with ongoing high-risk behaviours. Our aim was to assess the risk of HCV recurrence (late relapse and/or reinfection) post-sustained virological response (SVR).

METHODS

We searched the literature for studies reporting HCV recurrence rates post-SVR in PubMed, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library. Identified publications were divided into groups based on patient risk for HCV reinfection: low-risk HCV mono-infection, high-risk HCV mono-infection and a human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/HCV coinfection. The HCV recurrence rate for each study was calculated by using events divided by the person-years of follow-up (PYFU). HCV recurrence was defined as confirmed, detectable HCV RNA post-SVR.

RESULTS

In the 16 studies of low-risk patients, the pooled recurrence rate was 0.89/1000 PYFU (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.16-2.03). For the 19 studies of high-risk patients, the pooled recurrence rate was 29.37/1000 PYFU (95% CI, 15.54-46.91). For the eight studies of HIV/HCV-coinfected patients, the pooled recurrence rate was 23.25/1000 PYFU (95% CI, 4.24-53.39). The higher pooled estimates of recurrence in the high-risk and HIV/HCV-coinfected populations were predominantly driven by an increase in reinfection rather than late relapse.

CONCLUSIONS

The HCV recurrence risk after achieving SVR with all-oral DAAs therapy is low, and the risk of HCV recurrence in high-risk and HIV/HCV-coinfected populations was driven by an increase in reinfection rather than late relapse.

Hepatitis C Reinfection in People Who Inject Drugs in Resource-Limited Countries: A Systematic Review and Analysis

Hepatitis C (HCV) is a global pandemic. The World Health Organization has developed a strategic plan for HCV elimination that focuses on low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and high-risk populations, including people who inject drugs (PWID). While direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapies are highly effective at eliminating HCV infections and have few side effects, medical professionals and policymakers remain concerned about the risk of reinfection among PWID. This study is a systematic review of research measuring the rate of HCV reinfection among PWID in LMICs and identifies additional areas for further research. A systematic search strategy was used to identify studies documenting HCV reinfection after sustained virologic response in PWID in LMICs. We refined results to include studies where at least 50% of participants had DAA treatment for primary HCV infection. Pooled reinfection rate was calculated across all studies. Seven studies met eligibility criteria. Most studies were conducted in six upper middle-income countries (Mexico, Romania, Russia, Taiwan, Georgi, and Brazil) and one lower middle-income country (Bangladesh) with a total of 7665 participants. No study included information from PWID in low-income countries. Sample sizes ranged from 200 to 3004 individuals, with demographic data missing for most participants. Four studies used deep gene sequencing, and reflex genotyping procedures to differentiate reinfection (infection by a different HCV genotype/subtype) from virologic relapse (infection by the same strain). The follow-up time of people cured from primary chronic HCV infection ranged from 12 weeks to 6.6 years. The pooled reinfection rate of all seven studies was 2.8 (range: 0.02 to 10.5) cases per 100 person-years (PY). In the five studies that differentiated relapse from reinfection, the incidence of reinfection was 1.0 per 100 PY. To date, research on reinfection rates among PWID in LMICs remains limited. Research focused on PWID in low-income countries is particularly needed to inform clinical decision making and evidence-based programs. While rates of reinfection among PWID who complete DAA treatment in upper and lower middle-income countries were similar or lower than rates observed in PWID in high-income countries, the rates were highly variable and factors may influence the accuracy of these measurements. This systematic review identifies several areas for continued research. Policies concerning access to HCV testing and treatment should be comprehensive and not place restrictions on PWID in these settings.