Economic analysis of out-of-pocket costs among people in opioid agonist treatment: A cross-sectional survey in three Australian jurisdictions

Individuals 45 Years and Older in Opioid Agonist Treatment: A Scoping Review

This scoping review explores the unique challenges and needs faced by ageing individuals, aged 45 and above, in opioid agonist treatment (OAT), noting the earlier onset of age-related impairments among this population. The literature search was conducted in PsycINFO, EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Web of Science. A total of 28 observational studies were included. Five topics were identified: health, treatment, substance use, demographic, and social aspects. Findings reveal that, while health and age-related concerns are often discussed in the literature, limited attention has been given to gender differences, social factors such as financial issues, and psychological factors, which are also critical aspects of the lives of ageing individuals undergoing OAT. This review emphasizes the importance of expanding research to address these gaps, ultimately aiming to improve their overall well-being.

Prioritising people who use drugs in health policy: An Australian Capital Territory case study

INTRODUCTION

Governments are increasingly identifying priority populations on which to focus health policy and to measure health and wellbeing outcomes. Prioritising populations that are considered to be higher risk or to have particular needs that may not be captured within the parameters of health policy developed for the general population, is essential to health equity and efficient resource allocation. However, the criteria that governments use for prioritising populations is often vague or unspecified. To date, people who use drugs are almost never identified as a priority population in health policy, despite poor health and wellbeing outcomes.

METHODS

We developed three-pronged criteria-disadvantage, prevalence/accessibility and amenability to change-for prioritising populations in government health policy. We used these criteria to compare people who access alcohol, tobacco and other drug (ATOD) services with populations which are prioritised within the Australian Capital Territory Government's Wellbeing Framework.

RESULTS

Use of the criteria indicates that health policy prioritisation of people who access ATOD services is warranted. People who access ATOD services experienced worse health and wellbeing outcomes across all measures.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

Given increasingly explicit prioritisation of populations in health policy, there is an opportunity to advance health equity and embed policy efficiency through formal and transparent consideration of which populations to prioritise. Using set criteria for prioritising populations in health policy is possible, and could help identify populations often overlooked for prioritisation, such as people who access ATOD services.

Quantifying the impact of a large-scale opioid agonist treatment program on suicide prevention in New South Wales, Australia: A data-modeling study

AIMS

This study aimed to quantify the population-level impact of a large-scale opioid agonist treatment (OAT) program on suicide-related mortality among people with opioid use disorder (OUD) in New South Wales (NSW), Australia.

DESIGN

This is the first study to use dynamic mathematical modeling to explore the population-level impact of OAT on suicide mortality. The study used a two-part approach. First, we analyzed cohort data (2001-2017) to calculate incidence rate ratios (IRRs) and other model parameters related to OAT and suicide risk. Second, findings were applied to model outputs to estimate suicides averted by the NSW OAT program (2001-2020).

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

A cohort of 46 845 individuals who received OAT between 2001 and 2017 in community and prison settings in New South Wales, Australia.

MEASUREMENTS

IRRs for suicide and other model parameters were calculated for individuals on versus off OAT in community and prison settings (2001-2017). These estimates, along with model outputs, were used to determine the number and proportion of suicides averted by the OAT program (2001-2020).

FINDINGS

Receiving OAT was associated with an IRR for suicide of 0.32 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.25-0.40] in the community and 0.34 (95% CI = 0.10-1.10) in prison for cohort data analyses (2001-2017). Between 2001 and 2020, the OAT program in NSW averted an estimated 338 suicides [95% credible interval (CrI) = 213-492), with 325 (95% CrI = 202-476) averted in the community and 13 (95% CrI = 0-46) in prison, corresponding to a 35% (95% CrI = 27%-43%) reduction in suicides among those accessing OAT.

CONCLUSIONS

The opioid agonist treatment program in New South Wales, Australia, was associated with a 35% reduction in suicide mortality among individuals with opioid use disorder receiving treatment between 2001 and 2020, providing novel evidence of its population-level impact on suicide prevention.

The effect of out-of-pocket costs on medications for opioid use disorder and overdose: A scoping review

BACKGROUND

The opioid epidemic is a major public health crisis in Canada and elsewhere. The increase in opioid prescriptions is a major contributor to this crisis. Medications for opioid use disorder (OUD) and overdose are effective and lifesaving treatments. Often, patients do not have adequate insurance coverage (or uninsured) for medications for OUD and have to pay out of pocket (OOP). OOP costs (OOPCs) result in financial burdens among patients, limiting their access to medications for OUD, and overdose.

OBJECTIVES

To identify the evidence on (1) the OOPCs of medications for OUD and overdose, and (2) the effect of insurance coverage (or being uninsured) and corresponding OOPCs on medications for OUD initiation, retention, and discontinuation.

METHODS

This scoping review was conducted in accordance with methodological guidance from the Joanna Briggs Institute. The literature search aimed to identify peer-reviewed publications in English in MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL, which were searched from inception to March 22, 2024. Two reviewers independently completed title, abstract, and full-text screening against inclusion criteria. Data extracted were used to describe the body of literature using descriptive and qualitative approaches.

RESULTS

Out of the 2003 search results, a total of ten studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review. Uninsured patients have paid higher OOPCs compared to private or publicly insured patients. Among privately insured patients with OUD, greater OOPC may result in poor retention of buprenorphine. The risk of discontinuation was higher with the buprenorphine/naloxone tablet compared with the sublingual buprenorphine/naloxone film. Generic substitution or providing coverage for these medications being dispensed from community pharmacies can potentially minimize the burden of OOPCs and improve access.

CONCLUSION

The literature highlights beneficiaries of private/commercial health plans experience a substantial burden of OOPCs, creating barriers to treatment initiation, retention, and adherence to medications for OUD.

Provider costs of treating opioid dependence with extended-release buprenorphine in Australia

INTRODUCTION

The costs of providing medication-assisted treatment for opioid dependence can determine its scale of provision. To provide estimates of the costs of extended-release buprenorphine (BUP-XR), we performed a bottom-up costing analysis of provider operational treatment costs.

METHODS

Data were collected in a single-arm open label trial of BUP-XR injections conducted in specialist public drug treatment services and primary care private practices in three Australian states (the CoLAB study). The unit costs of resources used for each activity were combined with quantities used at each participating facility to arrive at the average annual cost per client.

RESULTS

One hundred participants across the six health facility sites received monthly subcutaneous BUP-XR injections administered by a health-care practitioner. The average cost of providing 1 year of treatment per participant was $6656 ($6026-$8326). Screening cost (initial assessment and medical history) was $282 while monthly follow-up appointments cost $531 per client. The main cost driver was the monthly treatment costs accounting for 79% of the average annual client cost, with medication costs comprising 95% of this cost.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

With medication costs making up the largest proportion of treatment costs, treatment using BUP-XR has the potential to free up other health system resources, for example, staff time. The costs reported in this study can be used in an economic evaluation to estimate the net benefit or cost-effectiveness of BUP-XR especially when compared to other opioid agonist treatments.

96-week retention in treatment with extended-release subcutaneous buprenorphine depot injections among people with opioid dependence: Extended follow-up after a single-arm trial

BACKGROUND

The most recent formulation of buprenorphine treatment is extended-release depot injections (BUP-XR) that are administered subcutaneously by health care professionals. This study aimed to observe treatment outcomes of BUP-XR delivered in standard practice during a 96-week follow-up period in a community setting.

METHODS

This study is an extension of the CoLAB study, a prospective single-arm, multicentre, open label trial (N=100, 7 sites in Australia) among people with opioid dependence who received monthly injections of BUP-XR to evaluate the retention in treatment. Participants were followed for 96 weeks, comprising 48 weeks of the CoLAB study followed by a 48-week extension.

RESULTS

Of 100 participants at baseline, 47 were retained on BUP-XR at 96 weeks. The median time retained on monthly depot was 90 weeks. Heroin use (adjusted OR=0.19, P=0.012) in the month prior to baseline was associated with lower odds of retention on BUP-XR. Older age at first opioid use (adjusted OR= 1.08, P=0.009) and longer duration in OAT at baseline (adjusted OR= 1.12, P=0.001) were associated with increased retention. Prevalence of past four-weeks opioid use was estimated at 4% at 96 weeks of treatment (prevalence 0.04, 95%CI: 0.00-0.11) compared to 15% at baseline. Quality of life and medication treatment satisfaction improved over time for those retained in treatment.

CONCLUSION

This is one of the few studies to describe long term (96 week) retention in treatment with BUP-XR in a community setting. It displayed retention rates with 47% of participants completing 96 weeks of treatment with BUP-XR. Patient reported outcomes suggest improvements in client wellbeing.

FUNDING

Indivior.

Deimplementation in the provision of opioid agonist treatment to achieve equity of care for people engaged in treatment: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Deimplementation, the removal or reduction of potentially hazardous approaches to care, is key to progressing social equity in health. While the benefits of opioid agonist treatment (OAT) are well-evidenced, wide variability in the provision of treatment attenuates positive outcomes. During the COVID-19 pandemic, OAT services deimplemented aspects of provision which had long been central to treatment in Australia; supervised dosing, urine drug screening, and frequent in-person attendance for review. This analysis explored how providers considered social inequity in health of patients in the deimplementation of restrictive OAT provision during the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS

Between August and December 2020, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 29 OAT providers in Australia. Codes relating to the social determinants of client retention in OAT were clustered according to how providers considered deimplementation in relation to social inequities. Normalisation Process Theory was then used to analyse the clusters in relation to how providers understood their work during the COVID-19 pandemic as responding to systemic issues that condition OAT access.

RESULTS

We explored four overarching themes based on constructs from Normalisation Process Theory: adaptive execution, cognitive participation, normative restructuring, and sustainment. Accounts of adaptive execution demonstrated tensions between providers' conceptions of equity and patient autonomy. Cognitive participation and normative restructuring were integral to the workability of rapid and drastic changes within the OAT services. Key transformative actors included communities of practice and "thought leaders" who had long supported deimplementation for more humane care. At this early stage of the pandemic, providers had already begun to consider how this period could inform sustainment of deimplementation. When considering a future, post-pandemic period, several providers expressed discomfort at operating with "evidence-enough" and called for narrowly defined types of data on adverse events (e.g. overdose) and expert consensus on takeaway doses.

CONCLUSIONS

The possibilities for achieving social equity in health are limited by the divergent treatment goals of providers and people receiving OAT. Sustained and equitable deimplementation of obtrusive aspects of OAT provision require co-created treatment goals, patient-centred monitoring and evaluation, and access to a supportive community of practice for providers.

Is use of opioid agonist treatment associated with broader primary healthcare use among men with recent injecting drug use histories following release from prison? A prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

A precipitous decline in health status among people recently released from prison is common. In Victoria, Australia, opioid agonist treatment (OAT) in the community involves frequent contact with primary care, potentially facilitating broader use of primary healthcare services. Among a cohort of men who injected drugs regularly pre-imprisonment, we estimated differences in rates of primary healthcare use and medication dispensation between people who did and did not receive OAT post-release.

METHODS

Data came from the Prison and Transition Health Cohort Study. Three-month post-release follow-up interviews were linked with primary care and medication dispensation records. Generalised linear models were fit with one exposure (OAT: none/partial/complete) for 13 outcomes relating to primary healthcare use, pathology testing, and medication dispensation, adjusted for other covariates. Coefficients were reported as adjusted incidence rate ratios (AIRR).

RESULTS

Analyses included 255 participants. Compared to no OAT use, both partial and complete OAT use were associated with increased rates of standard (AIRR: 3.02, 95%CI: 1.88-4.86; AIRR: 3.66, 95%CI: 2.57-5.23), extended (AIRR: 2.56, 95%CI: 1.41-4.67; AIRR: 2.55, 95%CI: 1.60-4.07) and mental health-related (AIRR: 2.71, 95%CI: 1.42-5.20; AIRR: 2.27, 95%CI: 1.33-3.87) general practitioner (GP) consultations, total medication (AIRR: 1.88, 95%CI: 1.19-2.98; AIRR: 2.40, 95%CI: 1.71-3.37), benzodiazepine (AIRR: 4.99, 95%CI: 2.81-8.85; AIRR: 8.30, 95%CI: 5.28-13.04) and gabapentinoid (AIRR: 6.78, 95%CI: 3.34-13.77; AIRR: 4.34, 95%CI: 2.37-7.94) dispensations, respectively. Partial OAT use was also associated with increased after-hours GP consultations (AIRR: 4.61, 95%CI: 2.24-9.48) and complete OAT use? with increased pathology utilisation (e.g. haematological, chemical, microbiological or immunological tissue/sample testing; AIRR: 2.30, 95%CI: 1.52-3.48).

CONCLUSION

We observed higher rates of primary healthcare use and medication dispensation among people who reported partial and complete OAT use post-release. Findings suggest that access to OAT post-release may have a collateral benefit in supporting broader health service utilisation, underscoring the importance of retention in OAT after release from prison.

"You'll come in and dose even in a global pandemic": A qualitative study of adaptive opioid agonist treatment provision during the COVID-19 pandemic

BACKGROUND

Opioid agonist treatment (OAT) improves multiple health and social outcomes, yet requirements to attend for supervised dosing can be burdensome and stigmatising. The COVID-19 pandemic and associated restrictions threatened continuity of care and the wellbeing of people receiving OAT, risking a parallel health crisis. This study sought to understand how adaptations in the complex system of OAT provision impacted and responded to risk environments of people receiving OAT during the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS

The analysis draws on semi-structured interviews with 40 people receiving and 29 people providing OAT located across Australia. The study considered the risk environments that produce COVID-19 transmission, treatment (non-)adherence, and adverse events for people receiving OAT. Drawing on theories of risk environments and complex adaptive systems, data were coded and analysed to understand how adaptations to the typically rigid system of OAT provision impacted and responded to risk environments during the COVID-19 pandemic.

RESULTS

During COVID-19, the complex system of OAT provision demonstrated possibilities for responsive adaptation to the entangled features of risk environments of people receiving OAT. Structural stigma was evident in the services which stayed rigid during the pandemic, requiring people to attend for daily supervised dosing and risking fracturing therapeutic relationships. In parallel, there were several examples of services developing enabling environments by offering flexible care through increased takeaways, treatment subsidies, and home delivery.

CONCLUSIONS

Rigidity in the delivery of OAT has been an impediment to achieving health and wellbeing over past decades. To sustain health-promoting environments for people receiving OAT, the wider impacts of the complex system should be acknowledged beyond narrowly defined outcomes relating solely to the medication. Centring people receiving OAT in their own care plans will ensure adaptations in the complex system of OAT provision are responsive to the individual's risk environment.

Prospective study of retention in opioid agonist treatment and contact with emergency healthcare following release from prisons in Victoria, Australia

BACKGROUND

People recently released from prison engage with emergency healthcare at greater rates than the general population. While retention in opioid agonist treatment (OAT) is associated with substantial reductions in the risk of opioid-related mortality postrelease, it is unknown how OAT affects contact with emergency healthcare. In a cohort of men who injected drugs regularly prior to imprisonment, we described rates of contact with ambulance services and EDs, and their associations with use of OAT, in the 3 months after release from prison.

METHODS

Self-report data from a prospective observational cohort of men who regularly injected drugs before a period of sentenced imprisonment, recruited between September 2014 and May 2016, were linked to state-wide ambulance and ED records over a 3-month postrelease period in Victoria, Australia. We used generalised linear models to estimate associations between OAT use (none/interrupted/retained) and contact with ambulance and EDs postrelease, adjusted for other covariates.

RESULTS

Among 265 participants, we observed 77 ambulance contacts and 123 ED contacts over a median of 98 days of observation (IQR 87-125 days). Participants who were retained in OAT between prison release and scheduled 3-month postrelease follow-up interviews had lower rates of contact with ambulance (adjusted incidence rate ratio (AIRR) 0.33, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.76) and ED (AIRR 0.43, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.83), compared with participants with no OAT use postrelease. Participants with interrupted OAT use did not differ from those with no OAT use in rates of contact with ambulance or ED.

CONCLUSION

We found lower rates of contact with emergency healthcare after release among people retained in OAT, but not among people reporting interrupted OAT use, underscoring the benefits of postrelease OAT retention. Strategies to improve accessibility and support OAT retention after leaving prison are important for men who inject drugs.

Changes and trends in medication-assisted treatment in Israel

BACKGROUND

As opioid prescription in Israel is increasing, there is a growing need for monitoring opioid use disorder and providing opioid agonist therapy. Our goal is to describe, sub-analyze, and identify obstacles in the treatment of opioid misuse in the Israeli medication assisted treatment centers.

METHODS

Data on methadone, buprenorphine, and buprenorphine combined with naloxone for the indication of opioid addiction treatment for the period 2013-2020 were obtained from pharmaceutical companies that distribute them in Israel. Data on utilization of these drugs were also extracted from the database maintained by the Israel Ministry of Health's Pharmaceutical Administration Division. The data were converted to defined daily doses (DDD)/1000 inhabitants/day.

RESULTS

The number of patients receiving medication assisted treatment increased by 10% since 2013, with a shift from buprenorphine alone to buprenorphine/naloxone in government-run centers. Methadone remains the most popular maintenance drug.

CONCLUSIONS

The change in opioid maintenance prescription does not match the significant increase in opioid consumption. Optimization of treatment can be achieved by the creation of a comprehensive database, cooperation between healthcare organizations and the government and further development of non-stigmatic and accessible services.

Discontinuation of opioid agonist treatment following release from prison in a cohort of men who injected drugs prior to imprisonment in Victoria, Australia: A discrete-time survival analysis

BACKGROUND

Retention in opioid agonist treatment (OAT) following release from prison is associated with improved outcomes, however factors associated with post-release OAT discontinuation in Australia are poorly understood. We examined post-release OAT discontinuation in a cohort of men who engaged in approximately monthly injecting drug use (IDU) prior to imprisonment in Victoria, Australia.

METHODS

Longitudinal data were used to calculate incidence of first-event post-release OAT discontinuation among men released from prison receiving OAT, and single-event discrete-time survival methods were used to estimate associations with post-release OAT discontinuation.

RESULTS

Among 110 participants, 55 OAT discontinuations were observed in the two years post-release, an overall crude incidence rate (IR) of 46 per 100 person-years (PY) (95 % confidence interval [95 %CI]: 36-60 per 100PY). Incidence was greatest between release from prison and first follow-up (IR: 84 per 100PY, 95 %CI: 62-116 per 100PY). Initiating OAT during index imprisonment (versus transitioning from community OAT; adjusted hazard rate [AHR]: 2.17, 95 %CI: 1.14-4.13) and identifying as Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander (AHR: 4.95, 95 %CI: 2.00-12.25) were associated with an increased hazard of OAT discontinuation.

CONCLUSION

In a cohort of men with recent histories of IDU released from prison receiving OAT, half reported OAT discontinuation within two years of release from prison, with incidence of discontinuation greatest soon after prison-release. Targeted support for men who initiate OAT during episodes of imprisonment and Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander peoples is necessary to reduce incidence of OAT discontinuation among people at greatest risk of discontinuation.

Incidence of primary hepatitis C virus infection among people who inject drugs in Australia pre- and post-unrestricted availability of direct acting antiviral therapies

AIMS

The 2016 Global Health Sector Strategy (GHSS) on viral hepatitis aims to reduce new hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections by 80% by 2030, including a 30% reduction by 2020. This study aimed to estimate primary HCV incident infection among a national sample of people who inject drugs (PWID) before and after the introduction of unrestricted access to HCV direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy via Australia's Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme in 2016.

DESIGN

A simple deterministic linkage method identified repeat respondents in serial cross-sectional surveys conducted among PWID. Two separate retrospective cohorts of HCV antibody-negative respondents were created, corresponding to the pre- (2010-15) and post- (2016-21) DAA time-periods.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

This study took place in Australia. Among 757 PWID retained (376 pre-DAA, 381 post-DAA), more than half were male (60%), the majority were heterosexual (80%), the median age was 40 years (interquartile range = 33-46 years) and the predominant drugs last injected were heroin (24%), pharmaceutical opioids (27%) and methamphetamine (41%).

MEASUREMENTS

The primary outcome was HCV seroconversion, defined as a negative HCV antibody test result followed by a positive HCV antibody result. Time to primary incident HCV infection was estimated using the person-years (PY) method.

FINDINGS

A total 97 of 376 (2010-15) and 41 of 381 (2016-21) HCV seroconversions were identified. Primary HCV incidence more than halved, from 13.6 per 100 PY [95% confidence intervals (CI) = 11.2, 16.6] in 2010-15 to 5.4 per 100 PY (95% CI = 3.9, 7.3) in 2016-21. The decline was independent of observed differences in demographic and drug use characteristics over the two time-periods (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.47, 95% CI = 0.31-0.69, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Australia has had a 53% reduction in primary hepatitis C virus (HCV) incidence among people who inject drugs following unrestricted availability of HCV direct acting antiviral therapy in March 2016. Given that PWID are the predominant population at risk of HCV infection in Australia, findings add to the evidence that Australia has probably met its 2020 Global Health Sector Strategy subtarget of a 30% decline in new infections.

High rates of resumption of injecting drug use following release from prison among men who injected drugs before imprisonment

AIMS

To estimate incidence of post-release injecting drug use (IDU) among men who injected drugs before imprisonment and determine factors associated with post-release IDU frequency.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS

Prospective cohort study of men reporting monthly IDU before a period of sentenced imprisonment in Victoria, Australia, recruited between September 2014 and May 2016 (n = 195).

MEASUREMENTS

Any post-release IDU and IDU frequency was measured via self-report at 3-month follow-up interview. IDU frequency, measured over the preceding month, was categorised as no IDU, irregular IDU (1-4 days IDU) and regular IDU (≥5 days IDU). Incidence of any IDU was calculated at 3 months post-release. Factors associated with IDU frequency were estimated using ordinal logistic regression.

FINDINGS

Most (83%) participants reported post-release IDU (265 per 100 person-years, 95% CI, 227-309); with half (48%) reporting regular IDU, 23% irregular IDU and 29% no IDU in the month preceding follow-up. Poorer psychological well-being at follow-up (General Health Questionnaire [GHQ-12] score; adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.18; 95% CI, 1.07-1.29) and post-release unemployment (AOR, 4.57; 95% CI, 1.67-12.49) were associated with increased IDU frequency. Retention in opioid agonist treatment (AOR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.24-0.98) was associated with reduced IDU frequency. Non-linear (inverted-u) associations between IDU frequency and age (age: AOR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.17-1.96; age-squared: AOR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.99-0.99) and pre-imprisonment IDU frequency (pre-imprisonment IDU frequency: AOR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.15-1.61; pre-imprisonment IDU frequency-squared: AOR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.99-0.99) were found, with odds peaking at age 39 and 19 days IDU, respectively. Longer baseline sentence length was associated with reduced odds of irregular and regular IDU (AOR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.99-0.99).

CONCLUSION

Among Australian men who inject drugs before imprisonment, resumption of injecting drug use after release from prison appears to be common, with imprisonment seeming to have little impact on reducing injecting drug use behaviour.