Arthroscopic Superior Capsule Reconstruction Technique in the Setting of a Massive, Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tear

Reliability of a Novel Preoperative Protocol for Determining Graft Sizes for Superior Capsular Reconstruction Using Plain Film Radiography

BACKGROUND

Superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) for massive, irreparable rotator cuff tears involves anchoring a graft between the superior glenoid and the greater tuberosity of the humerus. Optimizing the graft size is important. We aimed (1) to evaluate the reliability of plain film radiography in determining graft size for SCR and (2) to create a database to help predict future graft sizes.

METHODS

An inter- and intra-rater reliability trial was conducted on 10 and 6 subjects with healthy shoulders, respectively, using plain film radiography to measure the distance between the superior glenoid and the supraspinatus footprint. The subjects were positioned upright with an abduction pillow modified to hold the shoulder at 30° abduction and 45° external rotation, afterwhich a true antero-posterior shoulder radiograph was captured. Thirty subjects were recruited for the database and grouped using the aforementioned protocol.

RESULTS

The inter-rater and intra-rater trial agreement was excellent, with intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.94 (95% CI) and 0.76 (95% CI), respectively. Three medio-lateral patch sizes, of 33 mm, 38 mm, and 47 mm, were proposed based on the protocol in 30 subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

Plain film radiography demonstrated excellent reliability in measuring the distance between the superior glenoid and the supraspinatus footprint. Three ordinal patch sizes are proposed.

Biomechanical outcomes of superior capsular reconstruction for irreparable rotator cuff tears by different graft materials-a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Irreparable rotator cuff tears (IRCT) are defined as defects that cannot be repaired due to tendon retraction, fat infiltration, or muscle atrophy. One surgical remedy for IRCT is superior capsular reconstruction (SCR), which fixes graft materials between the larger tuberosity and the superior glenoid.

Patients and methods

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) criteria were followed for conducting the systematic review and meta-analysis. From their inception until February 25, 2022, Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library's electronic databases were searched. Studies using cadavers on SCR for IRCT were also included. The humeral head's superior translation and subacromial peak contact pressure were the primary outcomes. The humeral head's anteroposterior translation, the kind of graft material used, its size, and the deltoid load were the secondary outcomes.

Results

After eliminating duplicates from the search results, 1,443 unique articles remained, and 20 papers were finally included in the quantitative research. In 14 investigations, the enhanced superior translation of the humeral head was documented in IRCTs. In 13 studies, a considerable improvement following SCR was found, especially when using fascia lata (FL), which could achieve more translation restraints than human dermal allograft (HDA) and long head of bicep tendon (LHBT). Six investigations reported a subacromial peak contact pressure increase in IRCTs, which could be rectified by SCR, and these studies found a substantial increase in this pressure. The results of the reduction in subacromial peak contact pressure remained consistent regardless of the graft material utilized for SCR. While there was a statistically significant difference in the change of graft material length between FL and HDA, the change in graft material thickness between FL and HDA was not significant. The humeral head's anterior-posterior translation was rising in IRCTs and could be returned to its original state with SCR. In five investigations, IRCTs caused a significant increase in deltoid force. Furthermore, only one study showed that SCR significantly decreased deltoid force.

Conclusion

With IRCT, SCR might significantly decrease the glenohumeral joint's superior and anterior-posterior stability. Despite the risks for donor-site morbidity and the longer recovery time, FL is still the best current option for SCR.

Arthroscopic Acromiograft for Large-to-Massive Rotator Cuff Tears: A Rescue Technique for Restoring Shoulder Stability

A large-to-massive rotator cuff tear is a complicated disease for an orthopedic surgeon to get the best results and prevent complications like retears or progression to arthropathy. Although there are several surgical options for managing these tears, there is still no gold standard treatment. The key point in the solution would be preventing the upward migration of the humeral head to create a biomechanically stable joint to promote rotator cuff healing. In this article, we introduced a technique called an acromiograft, in which the allograft is attached to the undersurface of the acromion.

[The short-term effectiveness of superior capsular reconstruction using autologous fascia lata graft for irreparable massive rotator cuff tears]

OBJECTIVE

To observe and evaluate the short-term effectiveness of superior capsular reconstruction using autologous fascia lata graft for irreparable massive rotator cuff tears.

METHODS

The clinical data of 9 patients with irreparable massive rotator cuff tears treated with arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction by using autologous fascia lata graft between September 2019 and April 2020 were retrospectively analysed. There were 4 males and 5 females with a median age of 66 years (range, 55-70 years). The disease duration was 6-60 months with an average of 19.1 months. According to Hamada classification, the patients were classified as grade 1 in 2 cases, grade 2 in 2 cases, grade 3 in 2 cases, and grade 4 in 3 cases. Before and after operation, the visual analogue scale (VAS) score was used to evaluate the improvement of shoulder joint pain, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Constant score, and the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) shoulder function score were used to evaluate the improvement of shoulder joint function. The active range of motion of shoulder joint was recorded, including forward flexion, abduction, lateral external rotation, and internal rotation. The changes of subacromial space were recorded by anteroposterior X-ray film of shoulder joint. Sugaya classification was used to judge the integrity of rotator cuff immediately after operation and at last follow-up.

RESULTS

The operation time was 210-380 minutes, with an average of 302.3 minutes. All incisions healed by first intention after operation, and there was no complication such as infection and nonunion of incisions. Two patients had numbness of the upper limbs on the surgical side after operation, and the numbness completely relieved at 6 weeks after operation; 5 cases with preoperative pseudoparalysis symptoms recovered after operation. Nine patients were followed up 12-17 months, with an average of 14.1 months. At last follow-up, the patient's active range of motion of shoulder joint (forward flexion, abduction, lateral external rotation, and internal rotation), subacromial space distance, VAS score, ASES score, Constant score, and UCLA score significantly improved when compared with preoperative ones ( P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the Sugaya classification between at last follow-up and immediately after operation ( Z=-1.633, P=0.102).

CONCLUSION

Superior capsular reconstruction using autologous fascia lata graft can restore the superior stability and achieve a good short-term effectiveness for irreparable massive rotator cuff tears.

Advancement in Arthroscopic Superior Capsular Reconstruction for Irreparable Massive Rotator Cuff Tear

Irreparable massive rotator cuff tear (IMRCT) was one of the causes of shoulder dysfunction, despite technical improvement, the failure rate of IMRCT was still demonstrated to be high. Traditional treatments like non-surgical treatments, partial rotator cuff repair, and tendon transfers could only achieve a slight improvement. A potential cause for high failure rate was the fact that traditional treatments cannot restore the superior stability of glenohumeral joint, and thus restricted the movement of shoulder joint severely. Superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) using a variety of grafts (autograft, allograft, xenograft, or synthetic grafts) provided a promising option for IMRCT. In surgery, graft was fixed medially to superior glenoid and laterally to the footprint of humeral greater tuberosity. SCR could increase the stability of the superior glenohumeral joint, decrease the subacromial pressure and acromiohumeral distance. This review summarized the relevant literature regarding the alternative grafts, surgery indications, operative techniques and clinical outcomes of SCR. we compared the different grafts, key surgical steps, the advantages and disadvantages of different surgical methods to provide clinicians with new surgical insights into the treatments of IMRCT. In conclusion, IMRCT without severe glenohumeral arthritis was the best suitable indication for SCR. The clinical outcomes were positive in the short-term and middle-term following-up. More studies were necessary to determine long-term results of this surgical procedure.

Arthroscopic Superior Capsular Reconstruction for Management of Massive Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears: A Simple Alternative Technique

The use of acellular dermal allograft in arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction is a promising treatment option for massive irreparable rotator cuff tears. However, indications are limited to a subset of patients, so it is not routinely performed. Therefore, the surgery is technically demanding, although it has evolved in recent years. The authors present a simple alternative technique that addresses common pitfalls. [Orthopedics. 2021;44(3):e458-e462.].

Editorial Commentary: Superior Labral Reconstruction for Superior Humeral Migration With Large or Massive Rotator Cuff Tears: Not a Paradigm Shift…Yet!

Large or massive rotator cuff tears are vexing clinical problems. Current treatment algorithms, while effective for many patients, are associated with failure of repair, persistent pain, and weakness including the inability to use the hand above shoulder level for some. Superior humeral migration associated with large or massive rotator cuff tears may lead to arthrosis or shoulder weakness. The biceps tendon has been reported for superior capsular reconstruction, but not often for reconstruction of the superior labrum. However, it is widely recognized the glenoid labrum plays a primary role in anterior and posterior shoulder instability. Therefore, degeneration of the superior labrum leading to superior humeral migration is plausible. Superior labral reconstruction merits exploration as a complementary procedure in addition to other procedures to center the humeral head in the glenoid.

The Superior Glenohumeral Joint Capsule Alone Does Not Prevent Superior Translation of the Humeral Head: An In Vitro Biomechanical Study

PURPOSE

To answer 2 questions: What is the main structure that prevents the superior translation of the humeral head, the supraspinatus or the superior capsule (SC)? And what mechanism does the principal structure rely on to prevent the superior translation of the humeral head, the spacer effect or the tensional hammock effect?

METHODS

Eight shoulder specimens were assessed using a custom biomechanical testing system. Glenohumeral superior translation and subacromial peak pressure were compared using 6 models: the intact joint model, supraspinatus dysfunction model, supraspinatus defect model, SC tear model, SC defect model, and irreparable rotator cuff tear (IRCT) model.

RESULTS

Compared with the intact joint model, the supraspinatus defect model significantly increased the superior translation (by 2.6 mm; P < .001) and subacromial peak pressure (by 0.43 MPa; P = .013) at 0° glenohumeral abduction, while the SC defect model unremarkably altered the superior translation at 0° (by 0.6 mm; P = .582) and 45° (by 0.3 mm; P = .867) of glenohumeral abduction and the subacromial peak pressure at 0° (by 0.11 MPa; P = .961), 30° (by -0.03 MPa; P = .997), and 45° (by -0.33 MPa; P = .485) of glenohumeral abduction. The supraspinatus dysfunction model significantly increased the superior translation at 0° (by 1.7 mm; P < .001), 30° (by 1.2 mm; P = .005), and 45° (by 0.8 mm; P = .026) of glenohumeral abduction, but not the subacromial peak pressure compared with the intact joint model. However, no significant differences were found between the supraspinatus defect model and the supraspinatus dysfunction model with respect to the superior translation or subacromial peak pressure (all P > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

The anatomic SC has a negligible role in preventing the superior translation of the humeral head.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

SC reconstruction is not a simple anatomic reconstruction, and its promising clinical outcome may be due to tensional fixation technique and choice of graft.

Simplified Technique for Superior Capsular Reconstruction Using an Acellular Dermal Allograft

Superior capsular reconstruction is a powerful tool for the treatment of massive irreparable rotator cuff tears. Several authors have described this evolving technique. Issues of graft sizing, graft passage, graft tensioning, and suture management make this a challenging procedure even in the hands of experienced shoulder surgeons. We describe our arthroscopic technique for superior capsular reconstruction using nonirradiated human acellular dermis. We introduce several techniques for graft passage and tensioning that may help to simplify this challenging procedure and make it more reproducible.