Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Access to and Outcomes of Infertility Treatment and Assisted Reproductive Technology in the United States

Preserving Fertility in People With Rheumatic Diseases

ABSTRACT

Rheumatology patients historically were told they "can't" or "shouldn't" become pregnant. Improved rheumatic diagnostics and treatments have led to decreased morbidity and mortality and increased quality of life resulting in an opportunity to focus on fertility and its preservation. In the same vein as rheumatic disease care, assisted reproductive technology (ART), which includes freezing of egg and sperm as well as in vitro fertilization, has made considerable strides in the recent past. ART is safe for those with rheumatic diseases and has comparable outcomes to the general public, but may take additional effort due to optimal timing, rheumatic medications, and other nuances. In a specialty that treats chronic inflammatory diagnoses using teratogens and gonadotoxins, it is important to address family building desires with patients so their goals can be met.Rheumatologists have little knowledge of ART and how it impacts or applies to their patients; however, patients want their rheumatologist to be the source of knowledge for this information (Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022;74:suppl 9). Many barriers to ART exist and will be explored, with the financial burden being paramount (Glob J Health Sci. 6;1:181-191). Future efforts to examine the future fertility of rheumatology patients in an era of biologics and "treat-to-target" are needed to better understand who would most benefit from this costly and not without risk medical treatment. Given the changing landscape of financial support for ART due to insurance mandates, rheumatologists should not modify counseling based on the anticipated ability of patients to afford care. Preservation should also be broached with patients without partners and those from the LGBTQAI+ community. In addition to expanding the education of rheumatologists regarding this topic and its incorporation into clinical care, advocacy for ART access and insurance coverage is a much-needed future direction.

Racial/ethnic disparity in severe maternal morbidity among women who conceived by in vitro fertilization

Background

In vitro fertilization (IVF) as a fertility treatment is associated with adverse perinatal outcomes. Racial/ethnic disparity in severe maternal morbidity (SMM) in women who conceived by IVF is understudied.

Objective

To examine differences in the association between race/ethnicity and SMM between women who conceived spontaneously and those who conceived using IVF.

Methods

We included all singleton live births and stillbirths in the United States, 2016-2021; data were obtained from the National Center for Health Statistics. Maternal race/ethnicity included non-Hispanic White (NHW), non-Hispanic Black (NHB), American Indian and Alaska Native (AIAN), Asian, Pacific Islander (PI), Hispanic, and mixed-race categories. The SMM composite outcome included eclampsia, uterine rupture, peripartum hysterectomy, blood transfusion, and intensive care unit (ICU) admission. We used logistic regression to adjust for potential confounders (such as age, education, parity, prepregnancy body mass index, smoking during pregnancy, chronic hypertension, and preexisting diabetes) and to assess modification of the association between race/ethnicity and SMM by IVF.

Results

The study population included 21,585,015 women: 52% were NHW, 15% NHB, 0.8% AIAN, 6% Asian, 0.2% PI, 24% Hispanic, and 2% were of mixed race. IVF was used by 183,662 (0.85%) women; the rate of the SMM composite outcome was 18.5 per 1000 deliveries and 7.9 per 1000 deliveries in the IVF and spontaneous conception groups, respectively (unadjusted rate ratio 2.34, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.26-2.43). In women with spontaneous conception, NHB, Asian and mixed-race women had elevated odds of SMM compared with NHW women (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]=1.39, 95% CI 1.37-1.41; aOR=1.04, 95% CI 1.02-1.07; and aOR=1.42, 95% CI 1.38-1.46, respectively). Racial/ethnic disparities in SMM and its components were not different between the IVF and spontaneous conception groups for the mixed-race category. NHB and Hispanic women had significantly higher aORs for uterine rupture/intrapartum hysterectomy compared with NHW women in the IVF group, while Asian women had a higher aOR for ICU admission compared with NHW women in the IVF group.

Conclusion

Women who conceived by IVF have a greater than two-fold higher risk of SMM and this higher risk is evident across all racial/ethnic groups. However, NHB and Hispanic women who conceived by IVF had a higher risk of uterine rupture/hysterectomy, and Asian women who conceived by IVF had a higher risk of ICU admission. Our results warrant further investigation examining pregnancy and postpartum care issues among racial/ethnic minority women who conceive using IVF.

Moving toward Narrowing the United States Gap in Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) Racial and Ethnic Disparities in the Next Decade

The Disparities in Assisted Reproductive Technology (DART) hypothesis, initially described in 2013 and further modified in 2022, is a conceptual framework to examine the scope and depth of underlying contributing factors to the differences in access and treatment outcomes for racial and ethnic minorities undergoing ART in the United States. In 2009, the World Health Organization defined infertility as a disease of the reproductive system, thus recognizing it as a medical problem warranting treatment. Now, infertility care is largely recognized as a human right. However, disparities in Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility (REI) care in the US persist today. While several studies and review articles have suggested possible solutions to racial and ethnic disparities in access and outcomes in ART, few have accounted for and addressed the multiple complex factors contributing to these disparities on a systemic level. This review aims to acknowledge and address the myriad of contributing factors through the DART hypothesis which converge in racial/ethnic disparities in ART and considers possible solutions to effect large scale societal change by narrowing these gaps within the next decade.