Paediatric major incident triage: UK military tool offers best performance in predicting the need for time-critical major surgical and resuscitative intervention

Influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on the incidence and mortality of primary spinal tumors in the United States: A SEER analysis

INTRODUCTION

The effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the incidence and mortality of patients with primary spinal tumors remain less explored. We sought to illuminate the influence of the pandemic on the diagnosis and treatment of primary spinal tumors, providing valuable information for improving diagnosis and treatment strategies when facing unprecedented healthcare strains.

METHODS

Initially, we assessed the demographic characteristics and pathological types of patients with primary spinal tumors who died attributed to COVID-19 during the pandemic (2020-2021). Next, we extracted data on the age-adjusted incidence and mortality rates of primary spinal tumors between 2018 and 2021. The rates for the entire population were retrieved first, followed by stratification based on demographic characteristics and type of pathology. The rates from 2018 to 2019, before the pandemic, served as a reference for comparison with the pandemic period (2020-2021). The SEER 22 Registries database was adopted for this study.

RESULTS

In 2020 and 2021, COVID-19 emerged as the leading cause of death among patients with primary spinal tumors. The majority of patients who died attributed to COVID-19 were male, white, and over 60 years of age. Notably, 46.8% (58 out of 124) of them were diagnosed with primary spinal meningiomas. Between the pre-pandemic (2018-2019) and pandemic (2020-2021) periods, the incidence of primary spinal tumors decreased from 1.31 to 1.22 per 100,000 individuals, with a particularly significant decline observed in meningiomas. Moreover, the mortality rates increased from 0.30 to 0.37 per 100,000 individuals during the same period. This increase in mortality was significant among white individuals, those aged ≥ 70 years, and patients with primary spinal meningiomas.

CONCLUSIONS

Our analysis revealed that COVID-19 emerged as the primary threat to the survival of patients with primary spinal tumors during the pandemic. Compared with pre-pandemic data, we observed a significant decline in the incidence rates and a rise in mortality rates for primary spinal tumors.

An assessment of mass casualty triage systems using the Alberta trauma registry

OBJECTIVE

Triage is the process of identifying patients with both the greatest clinical need and the greatest likelihood of benefit in the setting of limited clinical resources. The primary objective of this study was to assess the ability of formal mass casualty incident triage tools to identify patients requiring urgent lifesaving interventions.

METHODS

Data from the Alberta Trauma Registry (ATR) was used to assess seven triage tools: START, JumpSTART, SALT, RAMP, MPTT, BCD and MITT. Clinical data captured in the ATR was used to determine which triage category each of the seven tools would have applied to each patient. These categorizations were compared to a reference standard definition based on the patients' need for specific urgent lifesaving interventions.

RESULTS

Of the 9448 records that were captured 8652 were included in our analysis. The most sensitive triage tool was MPTT, which demonstrated a sensitivity of 0.76 (0.75, 0.78). Four of the seven triage tools evaluated had sensitivities below 0.45. JumpSTART had the lowest sensitivity and the highest under-triage rate for pediatric patients. All the triage tools evaluated had a moderate to high positive predictive value (> 0.67) for patients who had experienced penetrating trauma.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a wide range in the sensitivity of triage tools to identify patients requiring urgent lifesaving interventions. MPTT, BCD and MITT were the most sensitive triage tools assessed. All of the triage tools assessed should be employed with caution during mass casualty incidents as they may fail to identify a large proportion of patients requiring urgent lifesaving interventions.

Fifteen-minute consultation: An overview of major incidents

Major incidents are rare but require a large amount of preparation, co-ordination and communication across different emergency services and specialities. This ensures that casualties are efficiently managed within the constraints of limited clinical resources. This article aims to provide a brief understanding of what constitutes as a major incident, how it is declared and the chain of command in communication and action, focusing specifically on the paediatric process. It also aims to highlight important considerations that could potentially be missed (eg, the mental health impact, forensic evidence and so on).