Intraarrest transport, extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and early invasive management in refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: an individual patient data pooled analysis of two randomised trials

Prehospital Ground and Helicopter-Based Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (ECPR) Reduce Barriers to ECPR: A GIS Model

INTRODUCTION

Evidence suggests that Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (ECPR) can improve survival rates for nontraumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). However, when ECPR is indicated over 50% of potential candidates are unable to qualify in the current hospital-based system due to geographic limitations. This study employs a Geographic Information System (GIS) model to estimate the number of ECPR eligible patients within the United States in the current hospital-based system, a prehospital ECPR ground-based system, and a prehospital ECPR Helicopter Emergency Medical Services (HEMS)-based system.

METHODS

We constructed a GIS model to estimate ground and helicopter transport times. Time-dependent rates of ECPR eligibility were derived from the Resuscitation Outcome Consortium (ROC) database, while the Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival (CARES) registry determined the number of OHCA patients meeting ECPR criteria within designated transportation times. Emergency Medical Services (EMS) response time, ECPR candidacy determination time, and on-scene time were modeled based on data from the EROCA trial. The combined model was used to estimate the total ECPR eligibility in each system.

RESULTS

The CARES registry recorded 736,066 OHCA patients from 2013 to 2021. After applying clinical criteria, 24,661 (3.4%) ECPR-indicated OHCA were identified. When considering overall ECPR eligibility within 45 minutes from OHCA to initiation, only 11.76% of OHCA where ECPR was indicated were eligible in the current hospital-based system. The prehospital ECPR HEMS-based system exhibited a four-fold increase in ECPR eligibility (49.3%), while the prehospital ground-based system showed a more than two-fold increase (28.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

The study demonstrates a two-fold increase in ECPR eligibility for a field-deployable ground-based system and a four-fold increase for a prehospital ECPR HEMS-based system compared to the current hospital-based OHCA system. This novel GIS model can inform future ECPR implementation strategies, optimizing systems of care.

Effect of intra-arrest transport, extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation and immediate invasive assessment in refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a long-term follow-up of the Prague OHCA trial

BACKGROUND

Randomized data evaluating the impact of the extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) approach on long-term clinical outcomes in patients with refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) are lacking. The objective of this follow-up study was to assess the long-term clinical outcomes of the ECPR-based versus CCPR approach.

METHODS

The Prague OHCA trial was a single-center, randomized, open-label trial. Patients with witnessed refractory OHCA of presumed cardiac origin, without return of spontaneous circulation, were randomized during ongoing resuscitation on scene to conventional CPR (CCPR) or an ECPR-based approach (intra-arrest transport, ECPR if ROSC is not achieved prehospital and immediate invasive assessment).

RESULTS

From March 2013 to October 2020, 264 patients were randomized during ongoing resuscitation on scene, and 256 patients were enrolled. Long-term follow-up was performed 5.3 (interquartile range 3.8-7.2) years after initial randomization and was completed in 255 of 256 patients (99.6%). In total, 34/123 (27.6%) patients in the ECPR-based group and 26/132 (19.7%) in the CCPR group were alive (log-rank P = 0.01). There were no significant differences between the treatment groups in the neurological outcome, survival after hospital discharge, risk of hospitalization, major cardiovascular events and quality of life. Of long-term survivors, 1/34 (2.9%) in the ECPR-based arm and 1/26 (3.8%) in the CCPR arm had poor neurological outcome (both patients had a cerebral performance category score of 3).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with refractory OHCA, the ECPR-based approach significantly improved long-term survival. There were no differences in the neurological outcome, major cardiovascular events and quality of life between the groups, but the trial was possibly underpowered to detect a clinically relevant difference in these outcomes. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01511666, Registered 19 January 2012.

[Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation(ECPR) - the Future?]

In recent years, invasive resuscitation methods utilizing veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) have gained significant attention. Despite advances in traditional resuscitation measures, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) mortality remains high. In the context of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR), VA-ECMO therapy offers a promising approach by providing circulatory support during cardiac arrest, allowing time for diagnostic evaluation and targeted therapy. However, patient selection for ECPR remains a challenge, relying on various factors including initial rhythm, duration of no-flow and low-flow states, as well as presence of reversible causes.Recent studies such as the ARREST, Prague OHCA and INCEPTION trials have investigated the efficacy of ECPR in OHCA patients, yielding mixed results. While the ARREST trial demonstrated a survival benefit with ECPR, the Prague OHCA and INCEPTION trials showed varying outcomes, reflecting the complexity of patient selection and treatment strategies. Despite inherent risks and complications associated with ECPR, it may offer a potential survival advantage under optimal conditions.Future directions in ECPR involve the development of innovative treatment protocols such as the CARL therapy, which incorporates specialized ECMO systems and tailored perfusion solutions. Early studies indicate promising outcomes with CARL therapy, emphasizing the importance of a well-coordinated and structured approach to ECPR implementation.In summary, ECPR shows promise in improving survival rates for OHCA patients within a well-organized healthcare system. However, further research is needed to refine patient selection criteria and optimize treatment protocols, ultimately enhancing patient outcomes in cardiac arrest scenarios.

Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: Lessons learned from recent clinical trials

Cardiac arrest is a leading contributor to morbidity and mortality in the United States. Survival has been historically dependent on high-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and rapid defibrillation. However, a large percentage of patients remain in refractory cardiac arrest despite adherence to structured advanced cardiac life support algorithms in which these factors are emphasized. Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is becoming an increasingly used rescue therapy for patients in refractory cardiac arrest to restore oxygen delivery by extracorporeal CPR (ECPR). Recently published clinical trials have provided new insights into ECPR for patients who sustain an outside hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). In this narrative review, we summarize the rationale for, results of, and remaining questions from these recently published clinical trials. The existing observational data combined with the latest clinical trials suggest ECPR improves mortality in patients in refractory arrest. However, a mixed methods trial is essential to understand the complexity, context, and effectiveness of implementing an ECPR program.

Wolf Creek XVII part 9: Wolf Creek Innovator in Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation Science Award

The Wolf Creek Conferences on Cardiac Arrest Resuscitation began in 1975, and have served as an important forum for thought leaders and scientists from industry and academia to come together with the common goal of advancing the field of cardiac arrest resuscitation. The Wolf Creek XVII Conference was hosted by the Max Harry Weil Institute of Critical Care Research and Innovation in Ann Arbor, Michigan on June 14-17, 2023. A new component of the conference was the Wolf Creek Innovator in Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation Science Award competition. The competition was designed to recognize early career investigators from around the world who's science is challenging the current paradigms in the field. Finalists were selected by a panel of international experts and invited to present in-person at the conference. The winner was chosen by electronic vote of conference participants and awarded a $10,0000 cash prize. Finalists included Carolina Barbosa Maciel from the University of Florida, Adam Gottula from the University of Michigan, Rajat Kalra from the University of Minnesota, Ryan Morgan from the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Mitsuaki Nishikimi form Hiroshima University, and Jacob Sunshine from the University of Washington. Ryan Morgan from the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia was selected as the 2023 Wolf Creek Innovator Awardee. This manuscript provides a summary of the work presented by each of the finalists and provides a preview of the future of resuscitation science.

The state of emergency department extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation: Where are we now, and where are we going?

Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) has emerged in the context of the emergency department as a life-saving therapy for patients with refractory cardiac arrest. This review examines the utility of ECPR based on current evidence gleaned from three pivotal trials: the ARREST trial, the Prague study, and the INCEPTION trial. We also discuss several considerations in the care of these complex patients, including prehospital strategy, patient selection, and postcardiac arrest management. Collectively, the evidence from these trials emphasizes the growing significance of ECPR as a viable intervention, highlighting its potential for improved outcomes and survival rates in patients with refractory cardiac arrest when employed judiciously. As such, these findings advocate the need for further research and protocol development to optimize its use in diverse clinical scenarios.

Clinical Use of Bedside Portable Low-field Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients on ECMO: The Results from Multicenter SAFE MRI ECMO Study

Purpose

Early detection of acute brain injury (ABI) is critical for improving survival for patients with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support. We aimed to evaluate the safety of ultra-low-field portable MRI (ULF-pMRI) and the frequency and types of ABI observed during ECMO support.

Methods

We conducted a multicenter prospective observational study (NCT05469139) at two academic tertiary centers (August 2022-November 2023). Primary outcomes were safety and validation of ULF-pMRI in ECMO, defined as exam completion without adverse events (AEs); secondary outcomes were ABI frequency and type.

Results

ULF-pMRI was performed in 50 patients with 34 (68%) on venoarterial (VA)-ECMO (11 central; 23 peripheral) and 16 (32%) with venovenous (VV)-ECMO (9 single lumen; 7 double lumen). All patients were imaged successfully with ULF-pMRI, demonstrating discernible intracranial pathologies with good quality. AEs occurred in 3 (6%) patients (2 minor; 1 serious) without causing significant clinical issues.ABI was observed in ULF-pMRI scans for 22 patients (44%): ischemic stroke (36%), intracranial hemorrhage (6%), and hypoxic-ischemic brain injury (4%). Of 18 patients with both ULF-pMRI and head CT (HCT) within 24 hours, ABI was observed in 9 patients with 10 events: 8 ischemic (8 observed on ULF-oMRI, 4 on HCT) and 2 hemorrhagic (1 observed on ULF-pMRI, 2 on HCT).

Conclusions

ULF-pMRI was shown to be safe and valid in ECMO patients across different ECMO cannulation strategies. The incidence of ABI was high, and ULF-pMRI may more sensitive to ischemic ABI than HCT. ULF-pMRI may benefit both clinical care and future studies of ECMO-associated ABI.

Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for refractory cardiac arrest in Australia: a narrative review

Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) in patients with prolonged or refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is likely to be beneficial when used as part of a well developed emergency service system. ECPR is technically challenging to initiate and resource-intensive, but it has been found to be cost-effective in hospital-based ECPR programs. ECPR expansion within Australia has thus far been reactive and does not provide broad coverage or equity of access for patients. Newer delivery strategies that improve access to ECPR for patients with OHCA are being trialled, including networked hospital-based ECPR and pre-hospital ECPR programs. The efficacy, scalability, sustainability and cost-effectiveness of these programs need to be assessed. There is a need for national collaboration to determine the most cost-effective delivery strategies for ECPR provision along with its place in the OHCA survival chain.

A randomized trial of expedited intra-arrest transfer versus more extended on-scene resuscitation for refractory out of hospital cardiac arrest: Rationale and design of the EVIDENCE trial

BACKGROUND

Refractory Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest (r-OHCA) is common and the benefit versus harm of intra-arrest transport of patients to hospital is not clear.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the rate of survival to hospital discharge in adult patients with r-OHCA, initial rhythm pulseless ventricular tachycardia (VT)/ventricular fibrillation (VF) or Pulseless Electrical Activity (PEA) treated with 1 of 2 locally accepted standards of care:1 expedited transport from scene; or2 ongoing advanced life support (ALS) resuscitation on-scene.

HYPOTHESIS

We hypothesize that expedited transport from scene in r-OHCA improves survival with favorable neurological status/outcome.

METHODS/DESIGN

Phase III, multi-center, partially blinded, prospective, intention-to-treat, safety and efficacy clinical trial with contemporaneous registry of patient ineligible for the clinical trial. Eligible patients for inclusion are adults with witnessed r-OHCA; estimated age 18 to 70, assumed medical cause with immediate bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR); initial rhythm of VF/pulseless VT, or PEA; no return of spontaneous circulation following 3 shocks and/or 15 minutes of professional on-scene resuscitation; with mechanical CPR available. Two hundred patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either expedited transport from scene or ongoing ALS at the scene of cardiac arrest.

SETTING

Two urban regions in NSW Australia.

OUTCOMES

Primary: survival to hospital discharge with cerebral performance category (CPC) 1 or 2. Secondary: safety, survival, prognostic factors, use of ECMO supported CPR and functional assessment at hospital discharge and 4 weeks and 6 months, quality of life, healthcare use and cost-effectiveness.

CONCLUSIONS

The EVIDENCE trial will determine the potential risks and benefits of an expedited transport from scene of cardiac arrest.

Wolf Creek XVII Part 7: Mechanical circulatory support

Introduction

Failure to restore spontaneous circulation remains a major cause of death for cardiac arrest (CA) patients. Mechanical circulatory support, specifically extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR), has emerged as a feasible and efficacious rescue strategy for selected refractory CA patients.

Methods

Mechanical Circulatory Support was one of six focus topics for the Wolf Creek XVII Conference held on June 14-17, 2023 in Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA. Conference invitees included international thought leaders and scientists in the field of CA resuscitation from academia and industry. Participants submitted via online survey knowledge gaps, barriers to translation and research priorities for each focus topic. Expert panels used the survey results and their own perspectives and insights to create and present a preliminary unranked list for each category that was debated, revised and ranked by all attendees to identify the top 5 for each category.

Results

Top 5 knowledge gaps included optimal patient selection, pre-ECPR treatments, logistical and programmatic characteristics of ECPR programs, generalizability and effectiveness of ECPR, and prevention of reperfusion injury. Top 5 barriers to translation included cost/resource limitations, technical challenges, collaboration across multiple disciplines, limited patient population, and early identification of eligible patients. Top 5 research priorities focused on comparing the outcomes of prehospital/rapid transport strategies vs in-hospital ECPR initiation, implementation of high-performing ECPR system vs standard care, rapid patient identification tools vs standard clinical judgment, post-cardiac arrest bundled care vs no bundled care, and standardized ECPR clinical protocol vs routine care.

Conclusion

This overview can serve as an innovative guide to transform the care and outcome of patients with refractory CA.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for cardiac arrest: what, when, why, and how

INTRODUCTION

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) facilitated resuscitation was first described in the 1960s, but only recently garnered increased attention with large observational studies and randomized trials evaluating its use.

AREAS COVERED

In this comprehensive review of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR), we report the history of resuscitative ECMO, terminology, circuit configuration and cannulation considerations, complications, selection criteria, implementation and management, and important considerations for the provider. We review the relevant guidelines, different approaches to cannulation, postresuscitation management, and expected outcomes, including neurologic, cardiac, and hospital survival. Finally, we advocate for the participation in national/international Registries in order to facilitate continuous quality improvement and support scientific discovery in this evolving area.

EXPERT OPINION

ECPR is the most disruptive technology in cardiac arrest resuscitation since high-quality CPR itself. ECPR has demonstrated that it can provide up to 30% increased odds of survival for refractory cardiac arrest, in tightly restricted systems and for select patients. It is also clear, though, from recent trials that ECPR will not confer this high survival when implemented in less tightly protocoled settings and within lower volume environments. Over the next 10 years, ECPR research will explore the optimal initiation thresholds, best practices for implementation, and postresuscitation care.

Frequency, clinical characteristics, and outcomes of pneumonia in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest undergoing extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation

Aim

This study aimed to describe the frequency, clinical characteristics, and outcomes of pneumonia in OHCA patients treated with ECPR in a multicenter setting.

Methods

This is a secondary analysis of the SAVE-J II study, which was a multicenter, retrospective cohort of OHCA patients treated with ECPR. Age, sex, comorbidities, presence of witnessed CA, presence of bystander CPR, initial rhythm, cause of CA, low-flow time, initiation of targeted temperature management, details of sputum culture, pneumonia, and prophylactic antibiotic use were recorded. Pneumonia was diagnosed when the patients met all the clinical, radiologic, and microbiologic criteria acquired after hospitalization.

Results

In total, 1,986 patients were included in the analysis, and 947 (48%) died during the first 2 days of admission. A prophylactic antibiotic was used in 712 (35.9%) patients. Overall, the hazard of death was high on days 1 and 2 of admission, exceeding 20% on both days; 251 (12.6%) patients developed pneumonia during hospitalization, and the hazard of pneumonia development remained high (>2%) in the first 7 days of admission.Staphylococcus aureus and Klebsiella species were commonly identified in the sputum culture. Among patients who survived the first 7 days, the odds ratio (OR) of those with pneumonia and unfavorable neurological outcomes defined by cerebral performance category 3-5 was approximately 1. In those who survived the first 10 days, the OR was greater than 1 with a wide confidence interval.

Conclusions

This is the first study describing details of pneumonia in OHCA patients treated with ECPR using a large dataset.

Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest - current status

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) is an emerging treatment for refractory cardiac arrest. In recent years, several randomized controlled trials have been published that aimed to address the efficacy and effectiveness of ECPR for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Despite the lack of high-quality evidence concerning clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness, ECPR is increasingly implemented throughout the world. In this review, we aim to provide an overview of the current status of ECPR for OHCA.

RECENT FINDINGS

Randomized controlled trials showed diverging results, largely due to differences in selection criteria and study design. Single-center studies, performed in centers with extraordinary expertise and dedication consistently achieve a low-flow time of around 60 min, but such achievements are rarely reproduced outside these centers. Strict patient selection can improve outcome but simultaneously limits the caseload. Preliminary data suggest that outcome may also be improved by avoiding hyperoxia postresuscitation.

SUMMARY

The potential of ECPR to increase survival in selected patients in highly dedicated systems seems to be proven, the question remains whether ECPR for OHCA can be widely implemented successfully and can develop into a sustainable, commonplace resource-effective treatment.

Serum lactate in refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: Post-hoc analysis of the Prague OHCA study

BACKGROUND

The severity of tissue hypoxia is routinely assessed by serum lactate. We aimed to determine whether early lactate levels predict outcomes in refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) treated by conventional and extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR).

METHODS

This study is a post-hoc analysis of a randomized Prague OHCA study (NCT01511666) assessing serum lactate levels in refractory OHCA treated by ECPR (the ECPR group) or conventional resuscitation with prehospital achieved return of spontaneous circulation (the ROSC group). Lactate concentrations measured on admission and every 4 hours (h) during the first 24 h were used to determine their relationship with the neurological outcome (the best Cerebral Performance Category score within 180 days post-cardiac arrest).

RESULTS

In the ECPR group (92 patients, median age 58.5 years, 83% male) 26% attained a favorable neurological outcome. In the ROSC group (82 patients, median age 55 years, 83% male) 59% achieved a favorable neurological outcome. In ECPR patients lactate concentrations could discriminate favorable outcome patients, but not consistently in the ROSC group. On admission, serum lactate >14.0 mmol/L for ECPR (specificity 87.5%, sensitivity 54.4%) and >10.8 mmol/L for the ROSC group (specificity 83%, sensitivity 41.2%) predicted an unfavorable outcome.

CONCLUSION

In refractory OHCA serum lactate concentrations measured anytime during the first 24 h after admission to the hospital were found to correlate with the outcome in patients treated by ECPR but not in patients with prehospital ROSC. A single lactate measurement is not enough for a reliable outcome prediction and cannot be used alone to guide treatment.

Case Report: Correlation between pulmonary capillary wedge pressure and left-ventricular diastolic pressure during treatment with veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

Background

Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) is often used as a surrogate for left-ventricular end-diastolic pressure in patients (LVEDP) who are on veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-A ECMO) support for cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest. However, the correlation between PCWP and LVEDP is not clear in the setting of V-A ECMO usage. We sought to evaluate this correlation in this case series.

Methods

Patients were referred to our cardiac catheterization laboratory for invasive hemodynamic studies to assess their readiness for VA-ECMO decannulation. All patients underwent simultaneous left and right heart catheterization. Using standard techniques, we measured PCWP and LVEDP simultaneously. Continuous variables were reported as medians with interquartile ranges. The correlation between PCWP and LVEDP was evaluated using simple linear regression and reported as R2.

Results

Four patients underwent invasive hemodynamic studies 4 (2.5, 7) days after VA-ECMO cannulation. All four patients had suffered in-hospital cardiac arrest and had been put on VA-ECMO. At the baseline level of VA-ECMO flow of 4.1 (3.8, 4.4) L/min, the median LVEDP and PCWP were 6 (4, 7.5) mmHg and 12 (6.5, 16) mmHg, respectively. At the lowest level of VA-ECMO flow of 1.9 (1.6, 2.0) L/min, the median LVEDP and PCWP was 13.5 (8.5, 16) mmHg and 15 (13, 18) mmHg, respectively. There was a poor correlation between the simultaneously measured PCWP and LVEDP (R2 = 0.03, p = 0.66).

Conclusions

The PCWP may not correlate well with LVEDP in patients treated with VA-ECMO, particularly at high levels of VA-ECMO support.

Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

BACKGROUND

Around the world, survival rates after cardiac arrest range between <14% for in-hospital (IHCA) and <10% for outof- hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). This situation could potentially be improved by using extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), i.e. by extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR).

METHODS

A selective literature search of Pubmed and Embase using the searching string ((ECMO) OR (ECLS)) AND (ECPR)) was carried out in February 2023 to prepare an up-to-date review of published trials comparing the outcomes of ECPR with those of conventional CPR.

RESULTS

Out of 573 initial results, 12 studies were included in this review, among them three randomized controlled trials comparing ECPR with CPR, involving a total of 420 patients. The survival rates for ECPR ranged from 20% to 43% for OHCA and 20% to 30.4% for IHCA. Most of the publications were associated with a high degree of bias and a low level of evidence.

CONCLUSION

ECPR can potentially improve survival rates after cardiac arrest compared to conventional CPR when used in experienced, high-volume centers in highly selected patients (young age, initial shockable rhythm, witnessed cardiac arrest, therapy-refractory high-quality CPR). No general recommendation for the use of ECPR can be issued at present.

[Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation-When the heart no longer functions]

Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) is an option for restoring blood circulation in patients with refractory circulatory failure. While conventional resuscitation measures are being continued, venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) is established in patients with cardiac arrest. This bypass can compensate for the functions of the heart and lungs until recovery of organ function. The benefit of ECPR compared to conventional resuscitation appears to be evident, especially after a prolonged resuscitation period; however, in three prospective randomized controlled studies an advantage has not yet been conclusively proven for widespread use in clinical routine. ECPR systems are complex and resource-intensive and should therefore be limited to specialized centers where sufficient numbers of patients are treated to ensure a high level of expertise in the teams.

Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for refractory OHCA: lessons from three randomized controlled trials-the trialists' view

Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation is a promising treatment for refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Three recent randomized trials (ARREST trial, Prague OHCA study, and INCEPTION trial) that addressed the clinical benefit of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest yielded seemingly diverging results. The evidence for extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, derived from three recent randomized controlled trials, is not contradictory but rather complementary. Excellent results can be achieved with a very high level of dedication, provided that strict selection criteria are applied. However, pragmatic implementation of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation does not necessarily lead to improved outcome of refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Centres that are performing extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest or aspire to do so should critically evaluate whether they are able to meet the pre-requisites that are needed to conduct an effective extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation programme.