Impact of minimal residual disease standardised assessment by FDG-PET/CT in transplant-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma enrolled in the imaging sub-study of the FORTE trial

Opportunities and challenges for MRD assessment in the clinical management of multiple myeloma

Measurable residual disease (MRD) assessment is, from the methodological point of view, ready for prime time in multiple myeloma (MM). Abundant evidence underscores the value of MRD status determined using highly sensitive next-generation flow cytometry and next-generation sequencing tests in evaluating response to treatment and, therefore, prognosis in patients with this disease. MRD response assessment and monitoring might present a range of opportunities for individualized patient management. Moreover, the considerable amounts of high-quality and standardized MRD data generated in clinical trials have led to the acceptance of MRD negativity as an early end point for accelerated regulatory approval of treatments for MM. The data leave no doubt that the efficacy of new regimens in inducing deeper and durable MRD-negative responses is connected with prolonged survival. Yet, several evidential, technical and practical challenges continue to limit the implementation of MRD-guided treatment strategies in routine practice, and the use of MRD as a surrogate end point remains controversial to some. In this Review, we draw on past and present research to propose opportunities for overcoming some of these challenges, and to accelerate the use of MRD assessment for improved clinical management of patients with MM.

Are we maintaining minimal residual disease in myeloma?

Minimal residual disease (MRD) has emerged as an important prognostic maker in patients with multiple myeloma at different stages of their treatment. Moreover, it is being increasingly incorporated as an endpoint in various clinical trials. Since maintenance therapy is an integral part of myeloma treatment, especially in the upfront setting post autologous transplantation, it is imperative to understand the role of MRD testing in the maintenance stetting. This review aims to examine the utility and dynamics of MRD testing in order to elucidate its prognostic role and possible incorporation in clinical decision making processes.

68 Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT-Based Response Evaluation and its Prognostic Value in Multiple Myeloma: Comparison With IMWG and 18 F-FDG-Based Response

PURPOSE

68 Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT targets CXCR4 receptors and provides superior diagnostic accuracy in multiple myeloma (MM) compared with 18 F-FDG PET/CT. However, its role in response evaluation remains unexplored. We propose a 68 Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT-based response evaluation criterion and evaluate its utility compared with International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria and 18 F-FDG PET/CT-based response.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this prospective single-center study, 40 treatment-naive myeloma patients were recruited between February 2021 and April 2023. Both 68 Ga-Pentixafor and 18 F-FDG PET/CT were performed at baseline and at follow-up (7.2 mo-median). Response to treatment was evaluated using the proposed 68 Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT criteria and compared with responses assessed by IMWG and 18 F-FDG PET/CT. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed and compared using Kaplan-Meier survival curves.

RESULTS

Among the 40 newly diagnosed MM patients [median age: 56.5 years (IQR 45.25 to 63.75); 24 men], 68 Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT was positive in a greater proportion of patients than 18 F-FDG PET/CT [90% (36/40) vs. 67.5% (27/40); P =0.02] thus, adequately evaluated response in additional 27.5% (11/40) of cases. Using the proposed criteria for 68 Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT, significant differences in PFS were observed across response categories [complete response (CR)-not reached, partial response (PR)-26.2 mo, progressive disease (PD)-15.3 mo; P =0.001]. Among patients achieving ≥very good partial response (VGPR) as per IMWG, those with positive 68 Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT had shorter PFS compared with those with negative findings (median PFS: 34.2 mo vs. not reached; P =0.056), whereas no significant difference was noted with 18 F-FDG PET/CT ( P =0.68). In addition, on follow-up of patients with negative 18 F-FDG at the response, those with discordant 68 Ga-Pentixafor findings had significantly shorter PFS (17.73 mo vs. not reached; P =0.010) compared with those with concordant negative findings.

CONCLUSIONS

68 Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT offers a more accurate assessment of treatment response and prognosis in MM patients, adding valuable information beyond the IMWG and 18 F-FDG PET/CT-based criteria.

Radiomics and Artificial Intelligence Landscape for [18F]FDG PET/CT in Multiple Myeloma

[18F]FDG PET/CT is a powerful imaging modality of high performance in multiple myeloma (MM) and is considered the appropriate method for assessing treatment response in this disease. On the other hand, due to the heterogeneous and sometimes complex patterns of bone marrow infiltration in MM, the interpretation of PET/CT can be particularly challenging, hampering interobserver reproducibility and limiting the diagnostic and prognostic ability of the modality. Although many approaches have been developed to address the issue of standardization, none can yet be considered a standard method for interpretation or objective quantification of PET/CT. Therefore, advanced diagnostic quantification approaches are needed to support and potentially guide the management of MM. In recent years, radiomics has emerged as an innovative method for high-throughput mining of image-derived features for clinical decision making, which may be particularly helpful in oncology. In addition, machine learning and deep learning, both subfields of artificial intelligence (AI) closely related to the radiomics process, have been increasingly applied to automated image analysis, offering new possibilities for a standardized evaluation of imaging modalities such as CT, PET/CT and MRI in oncology. In line with this, the initial but steadily growing literature on the application of radiomics and AI-based methods in the field of [18F]FDG PET/CT in MM has already yielded encouraging results, offering a potentially reliable tool towards optimization and standardization of interpretation in this disease. The main results of these studies are presented in this review.

Tumor burden quantified by soluble B-cell maturation antigen and metabolic tumor volume determines myeloma CAR-T outcomes

ABSTRACT

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy has emerged as a breakthrough treatment for relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). However, these products are complex to deliver, and alternative options are now available. Identifying biomarkers that can predict therapeutic outcomes is crucial for optimizing patient selection. There is a paucity of data evaluating the utility of both serum soluble B-cell maturation antigen (sBCMA) levels and metabolic tumor volume (MTV) at baseline in patients with RRMM undergoing CAR-T therapy. We identified a cohort of 183 patients with available serum to measure sBCMA and/or pretreatment MTV, derived from positron emission tomography-computed tomography scans obtained per standard of care. Expectedly, high pretreatment levels of sBCMA correlated with other established markers of tumor burden (eg, bone marrow plasma cells and β2 microglobulin) and inflammation and were highly prognostic for CAR-T-related toxicities and inferior progression-free survival (PFS). High MTV values were also associated with shorter PFS and inferior overall survival. The poor correlation observed between these 2 measures prompted evaluation of those with discordant results, identifying that those with low sBCMA and high MTV frequently had low/absent BCMA expression on plasma cells and suboptimal response. Our findings highlight the potential utility of sBCMA and MTV to facilitate more personalized treatment strategies in the management of RRMM eligible for BCMA-directed CAR-T.

Diagnostic Innovations: Advances in imaging techniques for diagnosis and follow-up of multiple myeloma

Introduction

The International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) defines myeloma related bone disease (MBD) as a diagnostic criterion for symptomatic multiple myeloma (MM) as the presence of osteolytic lesions ≥ 5 mm or more than one focal lesion (FL) ≥ 5 mm by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Whole-body low-dose CT (WBLDCT) is recommended as the first-choice imaging technique for the diagnosis of MBD with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/CT (18F-FDG-PET/CT) being considered a possible alternative at staging, whereas use of MRI studies is recommended in cases without myeloma-defining events (MDEs) in order to exclude the presence of FLs. Furthermore, use of 18F-FDG-PET/CT is recommended in response assessment, to be integrated with hematologic response and bone marrow minimal residual disease (MRD).

Areas covered

In this paper, we review novel functional imaging techniques in MM, particularly focusing on their advantages, limits, applications and comparisons with 18F-FDG-PET/CT or other standardized imaging techniques.

Conclusions

Combining both morphological and functional imaging, 18F-FDG-PET/CT is currently considered a standard imaging technique in MM for staging (despite false positive or negative results) and response assessment. The introduction of novel functional imaging techniques, as whole-body diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (WB-DWI-MRI), or novel PET tracers might be useful in overcoming these limits. Future studies will give more information on the complementarity of these imaging techniques or whether one of them might become a new gold standard in MM.

Novel drug combinations for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: how can we improve on current regimens?

INTRODUCTION

Multiple myeloma (MM) therapy has greatly evolved over the last decade. Immunomodulators and anti-CD38 antibodies have reshaped the therapeutic landscape. Nevertheless, relapses occur with worsening prognosis each relapse. Achieving deep responses in first-line treatment is key to reducing future disease burden.

AREAS COVERED

To advance patient outcomes, current regimens must be continuously refined through personalization, incorporation of biomarkers to guide therapy, and novel drugs. This review aims to assess existing therapies and investigate how integrating novel drug combinations and biomarker-driven approaches can improve efficacy and tolerability for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients. Meta-analysis, systematic reviews, original articles, and real-world studies were included in this review. Databases searched included PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar from inception until February 2025.

EXPERT OPINION

Discerning the best therapy sequence is a challenge for NDMM individuals. Minimal residual disease assessment is becoming a pivotal tool for guiding therapeutic approaches to enhance outcomes and tolerability. Emerging evidence supports early use of potent therapies - such as next-generation anti-CD38 antibodies and CELMoDs - to achieve deeper, more durable responses and possibly delay relapses. Immunotherapies like bispecific antibodies and CAR-T cells are also being explored in front-line settings, though reducing their infectious complications is still under investigation.

EANM guidelines on the use of [18F]FDG PET/CT in diagnosis, staging, prognostication, therapy assessment, and restaging of plasma cell disorders

We provide updated guidance and standards for the indication, acquisition, and interpretation of [18F]FDG PET/CT for plasma cell disorders. Procedures and characteristics are reported and different scenarios for the clinical use of [18F]FDG PET/CT are discussed. This document provides clinicians and technicians with the best available evidence to support the implementation of [18F]FDG PET/CT imaging in routine practice and future research.

Symptomatic Myeloma: PET, Whole-Body MR Imaging with Diffusion-Weighted Imaging or Both

According to international guidelines, patients with suspected myeloma should primarily undergo low-dose whole-body computed tomography (CT) for diagnostic purposes. To optimize sensitivity and specificity and enable treatment response assessment, whole-body MR (WB-MR) imaging should include diffusion-weighted imaging with apparent diffusion coefficient maps and T1-weighted Dixon sequences with bone marrow Fat Fraction Quantification. At baseline WB-MR imaging shows greater sensitivity for the detecting focal lesions and diffuse bone marrow infiltration pattern than 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET-CT, which is considered of choice for evaluating response to treatment and minimal residual disease and imaging of extramedullary disease.

Measurable Residual Disease Testing in Multiple Myeloma Following T-Cell Redirecting Therapies

Several novel T-cell-based therapies have recently become available for multiple myeloma (MM). These T-cell redirecting therapies (TRTs) include chimeric antigen receptor T-cells (CAR-T) and bispecific antibodies (BiAbs). In both clinical trial and real-world data, these therapies have demonstrated high rates of deep clinical response, and some are now approved for second-line treatment for relapsed MM. The deep and sustained clinical responses these therapies are capable of inducing will require sophisticated response monitoring to provide meaningful information for patient care. Obtaining measurable residual disease (MRD) negativity has been validated as an independent positive prognostic marker for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in both newly diagnosed and relapsed refractory patients with multiple myeloma. Assessment for MRD negativity was performed in all of the trials for FDA-approved TRT. Here, we summarize pertinent data for MRD assessment following TRT in MM and provide a rationale and structured framework for conducting MRD testing post TRT.

The Challenging Approach to Multiple Myeloma: From Disease Diagnosis and Monitoring to Complications Management

The outcome of multiple myeloma (MM) has significantly improved in the last few decades due to several factors such as new biological discoveries allowing to better stratify disease risk, development of more effective therapies and better management of side effects related to them. However, handling all these aspects requires an interdisciplinary approach involving multiple knowledge and collaboration of different specialists. The hematologist, faced with a patient with MM, must not only choose a treatment according to patient and disease characteristics but must also know when therapy needs to be started and how to monitor it during and after treatment. Moreover, he must deal not only with organ issues related to MM such as bone disease, renal failure or neurological disease but also with adverse events, often very serious, related to novel therapies, particularly new generation immunotherapies such as CAR T cell therapy and bispecific antibodies. In this review, we provide an overview on the newer MM diagnostic and monitoring strategies and on the main side effects of MM therapies, focusing on adverse events occurring during treatment with CAR T cells and bispecific antibodies.

Measurable Residual Disease and Decision-Making in Multiple Myeloma

Measurable (minimal) residual disease (MRD) has already proven to be one of the most important prognostic factors in multiple myeloma (MM). Each improvement in the depth of MRD testing has led to superior discrimination of outcomes, and sustained MRD negativity seems to be paramount to durable responses. Peripheral blood assays to assess for MRD are still under investigation but hold promise as complementary tools to bone marrow MRD assays such as next-generation sequencing and flow cytometry. Herein, the authors explore the evidence and potential benefits and drawbacks of MRD-adapted clinical decision-making in MM.

A rational approach to functional high-risk myeloma

Multiple myeloma is a clinically and biologically highly heterogeneous disease, as the overall survival can vary from more than a decade in patients with standard risk disease treated with intensive chemotherapy to 2-3 years in patients with high-risk features. The current staging systems, which rely on baseline biological risk factors to stratify patients into groups with differing risks of progression or death, are sometimes suboptimal tools for identifying high-risk patients. This is particularly evident when considering the so-called functional high-risk patients-patients who do not necessarily display baseline high-risk features but typically show a suboptimal response to induction therapy or relapse early after treatment initiation: the survival of these patients is particularly poor even in the context of newer therapies. The prompt identification, as well as a consistent definition, of this subset of patients, as well as their management, currently represents an unmet medical need. In this review we explore the main characteristics of functional high-risk patients, the available known risk factors and scoring systems, and the possible management.

Drug-tolerant persister cells in cancer: the cutting edges and future directions

Drug-tolerant persister (DTP) cell populations were originally discovered in antibiotic-resistant bacterial biofilms. Similar populations with comparable features have since been identified among cancer cells and have been linked with treatment resistance that lacks an underlying genomic alteration. Research over the past decade has improved our understanding of the biological roles of DTP cells in cancer, although clinical knowledge of the role of these cells in treatment resistance remains limited. Nonetheless, targeting this population is anticipated to provide new treatment opportunities. In this Perspective, we aim to provide a clear definition of the DTP phenotype, discuss the underlying characteristics of these cells, their biomarkers and vulnerabilities, and encourage further research on DTP cells that might improve our understanding and enable the development of more effective anticancer therapies.

Prospective evaluation of minimal residual disease in the phase II FORTE trial: a head-to-head comparison between multiparameter flow cytometry and next-generation sequencing

Background

Limited data are available on the concordance between multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) and next-generation sequencing (NGS) for minimal residual disease (MRD) detection in a large trial for multiple myeloma (MM) patients.

Methods

MRD was explored in the FORTE trial for transplant-eligible MM patients randomised to three carfilzomib-based induction-intensification-consolidation treatments and carfilzomib-lenalidomide (KR) vs R maintenance. MRD was assessed by 8-colour 2nd-generation flow cytometry in patients with ≥very good partial response before maintenance. NGS was performed in case of suspected complete response (CR) in a correlative subanalysis. Biological/prognostic concordance between MFC and NGS, conversion to MRD negativity during maintenance, and 1-year/2-year sustained MRD negativity were explored.

Findings

Between September 28, 2015 and December 22, 2021, 2020 samples were available for MFC and 728 for the simultaneous MFC/NGS correlation in the "suspected CR population". Median follow-up was 62 months. Biological agreement was 87% at the 10-5 and 83% at the 10-6 cut-offs. A remarkable prognostic concordance was observed: hazard ratios in MFC-MRD and NGS-MRD-negative vs -positive patients were 0.29 and 0.27 for progression-free survival (PFS) and 0.35 and 0.31 for overall survival, respectively (p < 0.05). During maintenance, 4-year PFS was 91% and 97% in 1-year sustained MFC-MRD-negative and NGS-MRD-negative patients (10-5), respectively, and 99% and 97% in 2-year sustained MFC-MRD-negative and NGS-MRD-negative patients, regardless of treatment received. The conversion rate from pre-maintenance MRD positivity to negativity during maintenance was significantly higher with KR vs R both by MFC (46% vs 30%, p = 0.046) and NGS (56% vs 30%, p = 0.046).

Interpretation

The significant biological/clinical concordance between MFC and NGS at the same sensitivity suggests their possible use in the evaluation of one of the currently strongest predictors of outcome.

Funding

Amgen, Celgene/Bristol Myers Squibb, Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation.