Metastatic renal cell carcinoma to the pancreas and other sites-a multicenter retrospective study

Characterization of FOLH1 Expression in Renal Cell Carcinoma

PURPOSE

Given the emergence of PSMA-targeted diagnostic agents and therapeutics, we sought to investigate patterns of FOLH1 expression in RCC and their impacts on RCC outcomes.

METHODS

We conducted a pooled multi-institutional analysis of patients with RCC having undergone DNA and RNA next-generation sequencing. FOLH1-high/low expression was defined as the ≥75th/<25th percentile of RNA transcripts per million (TPM). Angiogenic, T-effector, and myeloid expression signatures were calculated using previously defined gene sets. Kaplan-Meier estimates were calculated from the time of tissue collection or therapy start.

RESULTS

We included 1,724 patients in the analysis. FOLH1 expression was significantly higher in clear cell (71%) compared to non-clear cell RCC tumors (19.0 versus 3.3 TPM, p < 0.001) and varied by specimen site (45% primary kidney/55% metastasis, 13.6 versus 9.9 TPM, p < 0.001). FOLH1 expression was correlated with angiogenic gene expression (Spearman = 0.76, p < 0.001) and endothelial cell abundance (Spearman = 0.76, p < 0.001). While OS was similar in patients with FOLH1-high versus -low ccRCC, patients with FOLH1-high clear cell tumors experienced a longer time on cabozantinib treatment (9.7 versus 4.6 months, respectively, HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.35-0.93, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

We observed differential patterns of FOLH1 expression based on histology and tumor site in RCC. FOLH1 was correlated with angiogenic gene expression, increased OS, and a longer duration of cabozantinib treatment.

Beyond the knife: strategic patient selection for cytoreductive nephrectomy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To evaluate the current role of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) within the context of evolving treatment paradigms, focusing on implications for patient selection.

RECENT FINDINGS

Two randomized trials failed to show significant benefits from CN for intermediate and poor-risk patients undergoing targeted therapy. Despite this, subgroup analysis and retrospective data suggest potential benefits for a subset of good and intermediate-risk patients. Although currently used risk stratification tools guide CN eligibility, they have limitations, including, subjectivity, perioperative variability, and missing validation. Deferred CN may benefit patients responding to systemic treatment, whereas other patients may benefit from upfront CN. Emerging data supports the value of CN with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in selected patients, emphasizing the need for ongoing trials in the ICI era.

SUMMARY

The role and timing of CN in mRCC have evolved across therapeutic eras. Although awaiting prospective evidence in the current era of ICI, CN still has a role in the therapeutic approach for a subset of patients. The decision to recommend CN must be personalized and involve multidisciplinary discussions considering both patient- and tumor-related factors.

Long-term outcomes after surgical resection of pancreatic metastases from renal Clear-cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Clear-cell renal cell carcinoma frequently metastasizes to the pancreas (PMRCC). The management of such metastases remains controversial due to their frequent multifocality and indolent evolution.

METHODS

This study describes the surgical management of these lesions and their long-term oncological outcomes. The study included patients who underwent pancreatic resection of PMRCC at Bordeaux University Hospital between June 2005 and March 2022. Morbidity and mortality were assessed at 90 days. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free (DFS) survival were assessed at 5 years.

RESULTS

Forty-two patients underwent pancreatic resection for PMRCC, including 18 (42.8 %) total pancreatectomies. The median time from nephrectomy to the diagnosis of PMRCC was 121 (range: 6-400) months. Lesions were multiple in 19/42 (45.2 %) patients. Ten (23.8 %) patients suffered a severe complication (Dindo-Clavien classification ≥ IIIA by D90), including one patient who died postoperatively. The median follow-up was 76 months. The R0 rate was 100 %. The OS and DFS rates were 92.8 % and 29.6 %, respectively, at 5 years.

CONCLUSION

Pancreatic resection for PMRCC provides long-term oncological control despite a high recurrence rate.

A Rare Case of Giant Cell Arteritis After the Administration of Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy in a Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Patient

We present a rare case of metastatic renal cell carcinoma in a patient who developed giant cell arteritis (GCA) after the administration of checkpoint inhibitor therapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab. The patient was initially treated with a combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab, showing a near-complete response with minimal side effects. However, after several cycles of checkpoint inhibitor therapy, the patient developed symptoms consistent with GCA, leading to a halt in the immunotherapy. This report highlights the complexity of managing the adverse effects of immunotherapeutic agents and the importance of a multidisciplinary approach in the management of complications such as GCA.

Late Recurrence of Renal Cell Carcinoma in Unusual Sites 23 Years After Nephrectomy

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a common malignancy in the elderly population and it is notorious for its mechanism of late metastasis to unusual anatomical sites. Late recurrences are common following curative treatment, such as radical nephrectomy. Pancreatic metastases and hepatic metastatic lesions make the diagnosis and classification of a primary tumor challenging. This necessitates a high index of suspicion and an extensive interrogation. We present the case of a 68-year-old Hispanic female with progressive pain in the right upper quadrant, weight loss, and decreased appetite. She has a history of renal cell carcinoma treated with radical nephrectomy and radiotherapy. A pancreatic biopsy was performed based on the ultrasound and computed tomography findings at a private clinic. Subsequently, the patient was referred to the Instituto Oncologico Nacional (ION) due to immunohistochemical features suggestive of a well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor. At ION, a more comprehensive medical history was obtained, and the immunohistochemistry panel was extended, confirming the diagnosis of late recurrence of RCC. One possible explanation for the very late relapse of our patient is the presence of malignant cells that were spared or seeded during the surgical intervention and remained dormant or latent, subsequently spreading via hematogenous dissemination or via the lymphatic system. We highlight the importance of medical history, pathological examination, and immunohistochemical analysis in establishing a differential diagnosis, given the nature of RCC, which can often present asymptomatically and has a propensity for late recurrence. Further research should focus on developing standardized surveillance protocols for such cases.