[Guidelines for the treatment of Invasive Candidiasis and other yeasts. Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (SEIMC). 2010 Update]

Prosthetic Joint Infections due to Candida Species: A Multicenter International Study

BACKGROUND

Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) caused by Candida spp is a severe complication of arthroplasty. We investigated the outcomes of Candida PJI.

METHODS

This was a retrospective observational multinational study including patients diagnosed with Candida-related PJI between 2010 and 2021. Treatment outcome was assessed at 2-year follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 269 patients were analyzed. Median age was 73.0 (interquartile range [IQR], 64.0-79.0) years; 46.5% of patients were male and 10.8% were immunosuppressed. Main infection sites were hip (53.0%) and knee (43.1%), and 33.8% patients had fistulas. Surgical procedures included debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) (35.7%), 1-stage exchange (28.3%), and 2-stage exchange (29.0%). Candida spp identified were Candida albicans (55.8%), Candida parapsilosis (29.4%), Candida glabrata (7.8%), and Candida tropicalis (5.6%). Coinfection with bacteria was found in 51.3% of cases. The primary antifungal agents prescribed were azoles (75.8%) and echinocandins (30.9%), administered for a median of 92.0 (IQR, 54.5-181.3) days. Cure was observed in 156 of 269 (58.0%) cases. Treatment failure was associated with age >70 years (OR, 1.811 [95% confidence interval {CI}: 1.079-3.072]), and the use of DAIR (OR, 1.946 [95% CI: 1.157-3.285]). Candida parapsilosis infection was associated with better outcome (OR, 0.546 [95% CI: .305-.958]). Cure rates were significantly different between DAIR versus 1-stage exchange (46.9% vs 67.1%, P = .008) and DAIR versus 2-stage exchange (46.9% vs 69.2%, P = .003), but there was no difference comparing 1- to 2-stage exchanges (P = .777).

CONCLUSIONS

Candida PJI prognosis seems poor, with high rate of failure, which does not appear to be linked to immunosuppression, use of azoles, or treatment duration.

Candida bloodstream infection in patients with cancer: A retrospective analysis of an 11-year period

BACKGROUND

Candida bloodstream infection (CBSI) is a growing problem among patients with cancer.

AIM

To describe the main clinical and microbiological characteristics in patients with cancer who suffer CBSI.

METHODS

We reviewed the clinical and microbiological characteristics of all patients with CBSI diagnosed between January 2010 and December 2020, at a tertiary-care oncological hospital. Analysis was done according to the Candida species found. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to determine the risk factors associated with 30-day mortality.

RESULTS

There were 147 CBSIs diagnosed, 78 (53%) in patients with hematologic malignancies. The main Candida species identified were Candida albicans (n=54), Candida glabrata (n=40) and Candida tropicalis (n=29). C. tropicalis had been mainly isolated from patients with hematologic malignancies (79.3%) who had received chemotherapy recently (82.8%), and in patients with severe neutropenia (79.3%). Seventy-five (51%) patients died within the first 30 days, and the multivariate analysis showed the following risk factors: severe neutropenia, a Karnofsky Performance Scale score under 70, septic shock, and not receiving appropriate antifungal treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with cancer who develop CBSI had a high mortality related with factors associated with their malignancy. Starting an empirical antifungal therapy the soonest is essential to increase the survival in these patients.

Candidemia in Colombia

In Colombia, especially in intensive care units, candidemia is a frequent cause of infection, accounting for 88% of fungal infections in hospitalized patients, with mortality ranging from 36% to 78%. Its incidence in Colombia is higher than that reported in developed countries and even higher than in other Latin American countries. First, the patient’s risk factors should be considered, and then clinical characteristics should be assessed. Finally, microbiological studies are recommended and if the evidence supports its use, molecular testing. In general, American, Latin American, and European guides place the echinocandins as the first-line treatment for candidemia and differ in the use of fluconazole based on evidence, disease severity, previous exposure to azoles, and prevalence of Candida non-albicans. Taking into account the high incidence of this disease in our setting, it should be looked for in patients with risk factors to start a prompt empirical anti-fungal treatment.

Antifungal agents for invasive candidiasis in non-neutropenic critically ill adults: What do the guidelines recommend?

OBJECTIVES

Recommendations in clinical practice guidelines (CPG) may differ and cause confusion. Our objective was to appraise CPGs for antifungal treatment of invasive candidiasis (IC) in non-neutropenic critically ill adult patients.

METHODS

We systematically searched the literature for CPGs published between 2008 and 2018. We assessed the quality of each guideline using six domains of the AGREE II instrument. We extracted and compared recommendations for different treatment strategies and assessed content quality.

RESULTS

Of 19 guidelines, the mean overall AGREE II score was 58%. The domain 'clarity of presentation' received the highest scores (88%) and 'applicability' the lowest (18%). CPGs provided detailed recommendations on antifungal prophylaxis (n = 10), with fluconazole recommended as initial prophylaxis in all seven CPGs citing a specific drug. Echinocandin was recommended as the initial drug in all 16 CPGs supporting empirical/pre-emptive treatment; and in 18 of 19 for targeted invasive candidiasis treatment. However, it remains unclear when to initiate prophylaxis, empirical or pre-emptive therapy or when to step down.

CONCLUSIONS

The methodological quality of CPGs for antifungal treatment of IC in non-neutropenic critically ill patients is suboptimal. Some treatment recommendations were inconsistent across indications and require local guidance to help clinicians make better informed decisions.

Diagnosis and treatment of catheter-related bloodstream infection: Clinical guidelines of the Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology and (SEIMC) and the Spanish Society of Spanish Society of Intensive and Critical Care Medicine and Coronary Units (SEMICYUC)

Catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI) constitute an important cause of hospital-acquired infection associated with morbidity, mortality, and cost. The aim of these guidelines is to provide updated recommendations for the diagnosis and management of CRBSI in adults. Prevention of CRBSI is excluded. Experts in the field were designated by the two participating Societies (the Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology and [SEIMC] and the Spanish Society of Spanish Society of Intensive and Critical Care Medicine and Coronary Units [SEMICYUC]). Short-term peripheral venous catheters, non-tunneled and long-term central venous catheters, tunneled catheters and hemodialysis catheters are covered by these guidelines. The panel identified 39 key topics that were formulated in accordance with the PICO format. The strength of the recommendations and quality of the evidence were graded in accordance with ESCMID guidelines. Recommendations are made for the diagnosis of CRBSI with and without catheter removal and of tunnel infection. The document establishes the clinical situations in which a conservative diagnosis of CRBSI (diagnosis without catheter removal) is feasible. Recommendations are also made regarding empirical therapy, pathogen-specific treatment (coagulase-negative staphylococci, Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus spp., Gram-negative bacilli, and Candida spp.), antibiotic lock therapy, diagnosis and management of suppurative thrombophlebitis and local complications.

Candida periprosthetic joint infection: A rare and difficult-to-treat infection

BACKGROUND

Candida periprosthetic joint infection (CPJI) is a rare, difficult-to-treat disease. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical characteristics and outcomes of CPJI treated with various surgical and antifungal strategies.

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter retrospective study of all CPJI diagnosed between 2003 and 2015 in 16 Spanish hospitals.

RESULTS

Forty-three patients included: median age, 75 years, and median Charlson Comorbidity Index score, 4. Thirty-four (79.1%) patients had ≥1 risk factor for Candida infection. Most common causative species were C. albicans and C. parapsilosis. Thirty-five patients were evaluable for outcome: overall, treatment succeeded in 17 (48.6%) and failed in 18 (51.4%). Success was 13/20 (67%) in patients with prosthesis removal and 4/15 (27%) with debridement and prosthesis retention (p = 0.041). All 3 patients who received an amphotericin B-impregnated cement spacer cured. In the prosthesis removal group, success was 5/6 (83%) with an antibiofilm regimen and 8/13 (62%) with azoles (p = 0.605). In the debridement and prosthesis retention group, success was 3/10 (30%) with azoles and 1/5 (20%) with antibiofilm agents. Therapeutic failure was due to relapse in 9 patients, need for suppressive treatment in 5, persistent infection in 2, and CPJI-related death in 2; overall attributable mortality was 6%.

CONCLUSIONS

CPJI is usually a chronic disease in patients with comorbidities and risk factors for Candida infection. Treatment success is low, and prosthesis removal improves outcome. Although there is insufficient evidence that use of antifungals with antibiofilm activity has additional benefits, our experience indicates it may be recommendable.

Antifungal Activity of Chitosan-Coated Poly(lactic-co-glycolic) Acid Nanoparticles Containing Amphotericin B

Amphotericin B (AmB) is one of the most used drugs for the treatment of systemic fungal infections; however, the treatment causes several toxic manifestations, including nephrotoxicity and hemolytic anemia. Chitosan-coated poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) nanoparticles containing AmB were developed with the aim to decrease AmB toxicity and propose the oral route for AmB delivery. In this work, the antifungal efficacy of chitosan-coated PLGA nanoparticles containing AmB was evaluated in 20 strains of fungus isolates from patients with vulvovaginal candidiasis (01 Candida glabrata and 03 Candida albicans), bloodstream infections (04 C. albicans and 01 C. tropicalis) and patients with urinary tract infection (04 Candida albicans, 02 Trichosporon asahii, 01 C. guilhermondii, 03 C. glabrata) and 01 Candida albicans ATCC 90028. Moreover, the cytotoxicity over erythrocytes was evaluated. The single-emulsion solvent evaporation method was suitable for obtaining chitosan-coated PGLA nanoparticles containing AmB. Nanoparticles were spherical in shape, presented mean particle size about 460 nm, positive zeta potential and encapsulation efficiency of 42%. Moreover, nanoparticles prolonged the AmB release. All the strains were susceptible to plain AmB and nanostructured AmB, according to EUCAST breakpoint version 8.1 (resistant > 1 μg/mL), using broth microdilution method. In C. albicans (urine, blood, and vulvovaginal secretion isolates, and 1 ATCC), the MIC value of AmB-loaded nanoparticles varied from 0.25 to 0.5 μg/mL and EUCAST varied from 0.03 to 0.5 μg/mL. In urine and vulvovaginal secretion isolates of C. glabrata, the MIC value of AmB-loaded nanoparticles varied from 0.25 to 0.5 μg/mL and EUCAST varied from 0.03 to 0.015 μg/mL. In urine isolates of C. guilhermondii, the MIC value of AmB-loaded nanoparticles was 0.12 μg/mL and EUCAST was 0.06 μg/mL. In blood isolates of C. tropicalis, the MIC value of AmB-loaded nanoparticles was 0.5 μg/mL and EUCAST was 0.25 μg/mL. Finally, in urine isolates of T asahii, the MIC value of AmB-loaded nanoparticles was 1 μg/mL and EUCAST varied from 0.5 to 1 μg/mL. In the cytotoxicity assay, plain AmB was highly hemolytic (100% in 24 h) while AmB-loaded chitosan/PLGA nanoparticles presented negligible hemolysis.

Epidemiology of Candida isolates from Intensive Care Units in Colombia from 2010 to 2013

BACKGROUND

The frequency of Candida isolates as a cause of hospital infections has risen in recent years, leading to high rates of morbidity and mortality. The knowledge of the epidemiology of those hospital acquired fungal infections is essential to implement an adequate antifungal therapy.

AIMS

To describe the epidemiology of Candida infections in Intensive Care Units (ICUs) from a surveillance network in Colombia.

METHODS

Information was collected from the microbiology laboratories of 20 tertiary healthcare institutions from 10 Colombian cities using the Whonet® software version 5.6. A general descriptive analysis of Candida species and susceptibility profiles focusing on fluconazole and voriconazole was completed between 2010 and 2013, including a sub-analysis of healthcare associated infections (HAIs) during the last year.

RESULTS

Candida isolates made up 94.5% of the 2680 fungal isolates considered, with similar proportions for Candida albicans and non-C. albicans Candida species (48.3% and 51.7%, respectively). Among the latter, Candida tropicalis (38.6%) and Candida parapsilosis (28.5%) were the most frequent species. Of note, among the blood isolates C. albicans was not the main species. Most of the species isolated were susceptible to fluconazole and voriconazole. From the HAIs reported, 25.5% were caused by Candida; central line-associated bloodstream infection was the most common HAI (58.8%). There were no statistically significant differences regarding length of hospital stay and device days among HAIs.

CONCLUSIONS

In ICUs of Colombia, non-C. albicans Candida species are as frequent as C. albicans, except in blood samples where non-C. albicans Candida isolates predominate. Further studies are needed to evaluate Candida associated risk factors and to determine its clinical impact.

EPICO 3.0. Management of non-neutropenic patients in medical wards

BACKGROUND

Although the management of invasive fungal infection (IFI) has improved, a number of controversies persist regarding the approach to invasive fungal infection in non-neutropenic medical ward patients.

AIMS

To identify the essential clinical knowledge to elaborate a set of recommendations with a high level of consensus necessary for the management of IFI in non-neutropenic medical ward patients.

METHODS

A prospective, Spanish questionnaire, which measures consensus through the Delphi technique, was anonymously answered and e-mailed by 30 multidisciplinary national experts, all specialists (intensivists, anesthesiologists, microbiologists, pharmacologists and specialists in infectious diseases) in IFI and belonging to six scientific national societies. They responded to five questions prepared by the coordination group after a thorough review of the literature published in the last few years. For a category to be selected, the level of agreement among the experts in each category had to be equal to or greater than 70%. In a second round, 73 specialists attended a face-to-face meeting held after extracting the recommendations from the chosen topics, and validated the pre-selected recommendations and derived algorithm.

RESULTS

The following recommendations were validated and included in the algorithm: 1. several elements were identified as risk factors for invasive candidiasis (IC) in non-hematologic medical patients; 2. no agreement on the use of the colonization index to decide whether prescribing an early antifungal treatment to stable patients (no shock), with sepsis and no other evident focus and IC risk factors; 3. agreement on the use of the Candida Score to decide whether prescribing early antifungal treatment to stable patients (no shock) with sepsis and no other evident focus and IC risk factors; 4. agreement on initiating early antifungal treatment in stable patients (no shock) with a colonization index>0.4, sepsis with no other evident focus and IC risk factors; 5. agreement on the performance of additional procedures in stable patients (no shock) with sepsis and no other evident focus, IC risk factors, without colonization index>0.4, but with a high degree of suspicion.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the expert's recommendations, an algorithm for the management of non-neutropenic medical patients was constructed and validated. This algorithm may be useful to support bedside prescription.

Impact of a multifaceted educational intervention including serious games to improve the management of invasive candidiasis in critically ill patients

OBJECTIVES

Infections caused by Candida species are common in critically ill patients and contribute to significant morbidity and mortality. The EPICO Project (Epico 1 and Epico 2.0 studies) recently used a Delphi approach to elaborate guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of this condition in critically ill adult patients. We aimed to evaluate the impact of a multifaceted educational intervention based on the Epico 1 and Epico 2.0 recommendations.

DESIGN

Specialists anonymously responded to two online surveys before and after a multifaceted educational intervention consisting of 60-min educational sessions, the distribution of slide kits and pocket guides with the recommendations, and an interactive virtual case presented at a teleconference and available for online consultation.

SETTING

A total of 74 Spanish hospitals.

PARTICIPANTS

Specialists of the Intensive Care Units in the participating hospitals.

VARIABLES OF INTEREST

Specialist knowledge and reported practices evaluated using a survey. The McNemar test was used to compare the responses in the pre- and post-intervention surveys.

RESULTS

A total of 255 and 248 specialists completed both surveys, in both periods, respectively. The pre-intervention surveys showed many specialists to be unaware of the best approach for managing invasive candidiasis. After both educational interventions, specialist knowledge and reported practices were found to be more in line with nearly all the recommendations of the Epico 1 and Epico 2.0 guidelines, except as regards de-escalation from echinocandins to fluconazole in Candida glabrata infections (p=0.055), and the duration of antifungal treatment in both candidemia and peritoneal candidiasis.

CONCLUSIONS

This multifaceted educational intervention based on the Epico Project recommendations improved specialist knowledge of the management of invasive candidiasis in critically ill patients.

EPICO 3.0. Recommendations on invasive candidiasis in patients with complicated intra-abdominal infection and surgical patients with ICU extended stay

BACKGROUND

Although in the last decade the management of invasive fungal infections has improved, a number of controversies persist regarding the management of complicated intra-abdominal infection and surgical extended length-of-stay (LOS) patients in intensive care unit (ICU).

AIMS

To identify the essential clinical knowledge and elaborate a set of recommendations, with a high level of consensus, necessary for the management of postsurgical patients with complicated intra-abdominal infection and surgical patients with ICU extended stay.

METHODS

A Spanish prospective questionnaire, which measures consensus through the Delphi technique, was anonymously answered and e-mailed by 30 multidisciplinary national experts, all of them specialists in fungal invasive infections from six scientific national societies; these experts were intensivists, anesthesiologists, microbiologists, pharmacologists and specialists in infectious diseases. They answered 11 questions drafted by the coordination group after conducting a thorough review of the literature published in the last few years. For a category to be selected, the level of agreement among the experts in each should be equal to or greater than 70%. In a second round, 73 specialists attended a face-to-face meeting which was held after extracting recommendations from the chosen topics and in which they validated the pre-selected recommendations and derived algorithm.

RESULTS

After the second Delphi round, the following 11 recommendations with high degree of consensus were validated. For "surgical patients" seven recommendations were validated: (1) risk factors for invasive candidiasis (IC), (2) usefulness of blood culture and direct examination of abdominal fluid to start empirical treatment; (3) PCR for treatment discontinuation; (4) start antifungal treatment in patients with anastomotic leaks; (5) usefulness of Candida score (CS) but not (6) the Dupont score for initiating antifungal therapy in the event of anastomotic leakage or tertiary peritonitis, and (7) the administration of echinocandins as first line treatment in this special population. For "surgical ICU extended LOS patients" four recommendations were validated: (1) risk factors for IC, (2) presence of multi-colonization by Candida as a required variable of the CS, (3) starting antifungal treatment with CS≥4, and (4) to perform non-culture-based microbiological techniques in stable septic patients without evident focus.

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnosis and management of IC in ICU surgical patients requires the application of a broad range of knowledge and skills that we summarize in our recommendations. These recommendations, based on the DELPHI methodology, may help to identify potential patients, standardize their global management and improve their outcomes.

[Update on invasive candidiasis in non-neutropenic critically ill adult patients]

Invasive candidiasis in non-neutropenic critically ill patients remains a challenge for clinicians due to its association with high morbidity and mortality rates, increased incidence, and health-care costs. It is well known that early diagnosis and treatment are associated with a better prognosis. For these reasons a thorough update has been performed in this setting focused on recent Spanish epidemiology, new predictive scores and microbiological tests such as mannan antigen, mannan antibodies, Candida albicans germ-tube antibodies or (1→3)-β-D-glucan detection, molecular techniques for the detection of fungal-specific DNA, advances in antifungal treatment and educational programs in Spain. An early diagnostic and therapeutic algorithm is proposed based on the combination of scores and microbiological test. The aim of this review is to provide physicians with the best information available in order to improve the prognosis of these patients.

[Invasive yeast diseases in solid organ transplant recipients]

Invasive yeast diseases are uncommon nowadays in solid organ transplant recipients. Invasive candidiasis (2%) usually presents during the first month after transplantation in patients with risk factors. Both common and transplant-specific risk factors have been identified, allowing very efficacious targeted prophylaxis strategies. The most common clinical presentations are fungaemia and local infections near the transplantation area. Cryptococcosis is usually a late infection. Its incidence remains stable and the specific risk factors have not been identified. When cryptococcosis is detected very early, transmission with the allograft should be considered. The most common clinical presentations include meningitis, pneumonia, and disseminated infection. Intracranial hypertension and immune reconstitution syndrome have to be considered. No therapeutic clinical trials have been conducted in solid organ transplant recipients, thus treatment recommendations are derived from data obtained from the general population. It is particularly important to consider the possibility of drug-drug interactions, mainly between azoles and calcineurin inhibitors. Both invasive candidiasis and cryptococcosis increase the mortality significantly in solid organ transplant recipients.

Cost-effectiveness of three echinocandins and fluconazole in the treatment of candidemia and/or invasive candidiasis in nonneutropenic adult patients

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the cost-effectiveness of three echinocandins (anidulafungin, caspofungin, and micafungin) and generic fluconazole in the treatment of nonneutropenic adult patients with candidemia and/or invasive candidiasis in intensive care units in Spain.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A decision-tree model was applied. The success and safety (hepatic and renal adverse effects) of first-line treatments were obtained from meta-analyses and systematic reviews of clinical trials. In the case of failure, a second-line treatment (liposomal amphotericin B after the echinocandins, or one of the echinocandins after fluconazole) was administered. The duration of the treatments (14 days total) was established by a panel of clinical experts using the Delphi method and according to Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines. The cost of the medications and renal toxicity were considered. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analysis using Monte Carlo simulations were carried out.

RESULTS

The total cost of the treatment of candidemia and/or invasive candidiasis with anidulafungin, caspofungin, micafungin, and fluconazole was €5,483, €5,968, €6,231, and €2,088, respectively. Anidulafungin was the dominant treatment (more effective, less expensive) compared to micafungin and caspofungin. The cost of achieving one more patient successfully treated with anidulafungin, caspofungin, and micafungin compared to fluconazole was €17,199, €23,962, and €27,339, respectively. The result remained stable, despite modification of the duration of the first-line and second-line treatments, as well as most of the dosing regimens. The probabilistic analysis also remained stable.

CONCLUSION

In accordance with this economic study, anidulafungin would produce savings and would be the dominant treatment compared with micafungin and caspofungin in nonneutropenic adult patients with candidemia and/or invasive candidiasis in intensive care units in Spain.

Management of urinary tract infection in solid organ transplant recipients: Consensus statement of the Group for the Study of Infection in Transplant Recipients (GESITRA) of the Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (SEIMC) and the Spanish Network for Research in Infectious Diseases (REIPI)

BACKGROUND

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are one of the most common infections in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients.

METHODS

Experienced SOT researchers and clinicians have developed and implemented this consensus document in support of the optimal management of these patients. A systematic review was conducted, and evidence levels based on the available literature are given for each recommendation. This article was written in accordance with international recommendations on consensus statements and the recommendations of the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II).

RESULTS

Recommendations are provided on the management of asymptomatic bacteriuria, and prophylaxis and treatment of UTI in SOT recipients. The diagnostic-therapeutic management of recurrent UTI and the role of infection in kidney graft rejection or dysfunction are reviewed. Finally, recommendations on antimicrobials and immunosuppressant interactions are also included.

CONCLUSIONS

The latest scientific information on UTI in SOT is incorporated in this consensus document.

[Patients treated with micafungin during their stay in intensive care unit]

OBJECTIVES

To determine the reasons of prescription, the characteristics of patients and factors that affected the outcome of critically ill patients treated with micafungin (MCF) during their stay in Spanish ICUs.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Observational, retrospective and multicenter study. Patients admitted to the ICU between March 2011 and October 2012 (20-month period) treated with MCF for any reason were included in the study. Severity of patients at the beginning of treatment was measured with the APACHE II, SOFA, Child-Pugh and MELD scores. Reasons for the use of MCF were classified as prophylaxis, preemptive treatment, empirical treatment and directed treatment. Continuous variables are expressed as mean and standard deviation or median, and categorical variables as percentages. A multivariate analysis was performed to identify variables related to intra-ICU mortality.

RESULTS

The study population included 139 patients admitted to 19 Spanish ICUs, with a mean age of 57.3 (17.1) years, 89 (64%) men, with surgical (53.2%) and/or medical (44.6%) conditions, APACHE II score of 20.6 (7.7) and SOFA score of 8.4 (4.3), with 84.2% of patients requiring mechanical ventilation, 59% parenteral nutrition, 37.4% extrarenal depuration procedures and 37.4% treatment with steroids. MCF was indicated as empirical treatment of a proven infection in 51 (36.7%) cases, pre-emptive treatment in 50 (36%) especially as a result of the application of the Candida score (32 cases), directed treatment of fungal infection in 23 (16.5%) and as prophylactic treatment in 15 (10.8%) cases. In 108 (77%) cases, a daily dose of 100mg was administered, with a loading dose in only 9 cases (6.5%). The mean duration of treatment was 13.1 (13) days. A total of 59 (42.4%) patients died during their stay in the ICU and 16 after ICU discharge (hospital mortality 53.9%). Independent risk factors for intra-ICU mortality were the Child-Pugh score (OR 1.45, 95% CI 1.162-1.813; P=.001) and the MELD score (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.011-1.099; P=.014).

CONCLUSIONS

MCF is usually administered at a dose of 100mg/day, without loading dose and in 72.7% of cases as pre-emptive or empirical treatment. Factors that better predicted mortality were indicators of liver insufficiency at the time of starting treatment.

Antifungal clinical trials and guidelines: what we know and do not know

For over the last three decades, extensive testing of antifungal compounds in clinical trials has been essential to the development of treatment guidelines for the most common invasive fungal infections, including cryptococcosis, candidiasis, aspergillosis, and the endemic fungi. These guidelines have greatly helped guide clinicians in the management of these complicated diseases. The data on which most of these guidelines are based are among the most widely recognized and cited clinical trials comparing antimicrobial agents. Unfortunately, there are many unanswered questions with respect to the diagnosis and treatment of these emerging disorders. Regarding treatment, there is a need for more clinically effective and less toxic agents. The current armamentarium of antifungal agents represents important progress over gold standard agents such as amphotericin B, but there is much progress to be made. With respect to diagnostics, mycology has generally lagged behind other disciplines in microbiology, as there are very few rapid, sensitive, specific, and point-of-care diagnostics. The ability to implement therapies for at-risk patients based on positive early diagnostic signals would greatly enhance the ability to intervene with appropriate antifungal therapy in a more targeted and specific manner. This article will review some of the major advances, as well as significant challenges that remain in the management of invasive mycoses.

EPICO 2.0 project. Development of educational therapeutic recommendations using the DELPHI technique on invasive candidiasis in critically ill adult patients in special situations

BACKGROUND

Although there has been an improved management of invasive candidiasis in the last decade, still controversial issues remain, especially in different therapeutic critical care scenarios.

AIMS

We sought to identify the core clinical knowledge and to achieve high agreement recommendations required to care for critically ill adult patients with invasive candidiasis for antifungal treatment in special situations and different scenarios.

METHODS

Second prospective Spanish survey reaching consensus by the DELPHI technique, conducted anonymously by electronic e-mail in the first phase to 23 national multidisciplinary experts in invasive fungal infections from five national scientific societies including intensivists, anesthesiologists, microbiologists, pharmacologists and infectious disease specialists, answering 30 questions prepared by a coordination group after a strict review of literature in the last five years. The educational objectives spanned four categories, including peritoneal candidiasis, immunocompromised patients, special situations, and organ failures. The agreement among panelists in each item should be higher than 75% to be selected. In a second phase, after extracting recommendations from the selected items, a meeting was held with more than 60 specialists in a second round invited to validate the preselected recommendations.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

In the first phase, 15 recommendations were preselected (peritoneal candidiasis (3), immunocompromised patients (6), special situations (3), and organ failures (3)). After the second round the following 13 were validated: Peritoneal candidiasis (3): Source control and early adequate antifungal treatment is mandatory; empirical antifungal treatment is recommended in secondary nosocomial peritonitis with Candida spp. colonization risk factors and in tertiary peritonitis. Immunocompromised patients (5): consider hepatotoxicity and interactions before starting antifungal treatment with azoles in transplanted patients; treat candidemia in neutropenic adult patients with antifungal drugs at least 14 days after the first blood culture negative and until normalization of neutrophils is achieved. Caspofungin, if needed, is the echinocandin with most scientific evidence to treat candidemia in neutropenic adult patients; caspofungin is also the first choice drug to treat febrile candidemia; in neutropenic patients with candidemia remove catheter. Special situations (2): in moderate hepatocellular failure, patients with invasive candidiasis use echinocandins (preferably low doses of anidulafungin and caspofungin) and try to avoid azoles; in case of possible interactions review all the drugs involved and preferably use anidulafungin. Organ failures (3): echinocandins are the safest antifungal drugs; reconsider the use of azoles in patients under renal replacement therapy; all of the echinocandins to treat patients under continuous renal replacement therapy are accepted and do not require dosage adjustment.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of invasive candidiasis in ICU patients requires a broad range of knowledge and skills as summarized in our recommendations. These recommendations may help to optimize the therapeutic management of these patients in special situations and different scenarios and improve their outcome based on the DELPHI methodology.

[Nosocomial infection in patients receiving a solid organ transplant or haematopoietic stem cell transplant]

Bacterial infections are the most common infections in solid organ transplant recipients. These infections occur mainly in the first month after transplantation and are hospital-acquired. Nosocomial infections cause significant morbidity and are the most common cause of mortality in this early period of transplantation. These infections are caused by multi-drug resistant (MDR) microorganisms, mainly Gram-negative enterobacteria, non-fermentative Gram-negative bacilli, enterococci, and staphylococci. The patients at risk of developing nosocomial bacterial infections are those previously colonized with MDR bacteria while on the transplant waiting list. Intravascular catheters, the urinary tract, the lungs, and surgical wounds are the most frequent sources of infection. Preventive measures are the same as those applied in non-immunocompromised, hospitalized patients except in patients at high risk for developing fungal infection. These patients need antifungal therapy during their hospitalization, and for preventing some bacterial infections in the early transplant period, patients need vaccinations on the waiting list according to the current recommendations. Although morbidity and mortality related to infectious diseases have decreased during the last few years in haematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients, they are still one of the most important complications in this population. Furthermore, as occurs in the general population, the incidence of nosocomial infections has increased during the different phases of transplantation. It is difficult to establish general preventive measures in these patients, as there are many risk factors conditioning these infections. Firstly, they undergo multiple antibiotic treatments and interventions; secondly, there is a wide variability in the degree of neutropenia and immunosuppression among patients, and finally they combine hospital and home stay during the transplant process. However, some simple measures could be implemented to improve the current situation.

A research agenda on the management of intra-abdominal candidiasis: results from a consensus of multinational experts

INTRODUCTION

intra-abdominal candidiasis (IAC) may include Candida involvement of peritoneum or intra-abdominal abscess and is burdened by high morbidity and mortality rates in surgical patients. Unfortunately, international guidelines do not specifically address this particular clinical setting due to heterogeneity of definitions and scant direct evidence. In order to cover this unmet clinical need, the Italian Society of Intensive Care and the International Society of Chemotherapy endorsed a project aimed at producing practice recommendations for the management of immune-competent adult patients with IAC.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary expert panel of 22 members (surgeons, infectious disease and intensive care physicians) was convened and assisted by a methodologist between April 2012 and May 2013. Evidence supporting each statement was graded according to the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infection Diseases (ESCMID) grading system.

RESULTS

Only a few of the numerous recommendations can be summarized in the Abstract. Direct microscopy examination for yeast detection from purulent and necrotic intra-abdominal specimens during surgery or by percutaneous aspiration is recommended in all patients with nonappendicular abdominal infections including secondary and tertiary peritonitis. Samples obtained from drainage tubes are not valuable except for evaluation of colonization. Prophylactic usage of fluconazole should be adopted in patients with recent abdominal surgery and recurrent gastrointestinal perforation or anastomotic leakage. Empirical antifungal treatment with echinocandins or lipid formulations of amphotericin B should be strongly considered in critically ill patients or those with previous exposure to azoles and suspected intra-abdominal infection with at least one specific risk factor for Candida infection. In patients with nonspecific risk factors, a positive mannan/antimannan or (1→3)-β-D-glucan (BDG) or polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test result should be present to start empirical therapy. Fluconazole can be adopted for the empirical and targeted therapy of non-critically ill patients without previous exposure to azoles unless they are known to be colonized with a Candida strain with reduced susceptibility to azoles. Treatment can be simplified by stepping down to an azole (fluconazole or voriconazole) after at least 5-7 days of treatment with echinocandins or lipid formulations of amphotericin B, if the species is susceptible and the patient has clinically improved.

CONCLUSIONS

Specific recommendations were elaborated on IAC management based on the best direct and indirect evidence and on the expertise of a multinational panel.

ÉPICO project. Development of educational recommendations using the DELPHI technique on invasive candidiasis in non-neutropenic critically ill adult patients

BACKGROUND

Although there has been an improved management of invasive candidiasis in the last decade, controversial issues still remain, especially in the diagnostic and therapeutic approaches.

AIMS

We sought to identify the core clinical knowledge and to achieve high level agreement recommendations required to care for critically ill adult patients with invasive candidiasis.

METHODS

A prospective Spanish survey reaching consensus by the DELPHI technique was made. It was anonymously conducted by electronic mail in a first term to 25 national multidisciplinary experts in invasive fungal infections from five national scientific societies, including intensivists, anesthesiologists, microbiologists, pharmacologists and infectious diseases specialists, who answered to 47 questions prepared by a coordination group after a strict review of the literature in the last five years. The educational objectives spanned five categories, including epidemiology, diagnostic tools, prediction rules, and treatment and de-escalation approaches. The level of agreement achieved among the panel experts in each item should exceed 75% to be selected. In a second term, after extracting recommendations from the selected items, a face to face meeting was performed where more than 80 specialists in a second round were invited to validate the preselected recommendations.

RESULTS

In the first term, 20 recommendations were preselected (Epidemiology 4, Scores 3, Diagnostic tools 4, Treatment 6 and De-escalation approaches 3). After the second round, the following 12 were validated: (1) Epidemiology (2 recommendations): think about candidiasis in your Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and do not forget that non-Candida albicans-Candida species also exist. (2) Diagnostic tools (4 recommendations): blood cultures should be performed under suspicion every 2-3 days and, if positive, every 3 days until obtaining the first negative result. Obtain sterile fluid and tissue, if possible (direct examination of the sample is important). Use non-culture based methods as microbiological tools, whenever possible. Determination of antifungal susceptibility is mandatory. (3) Scores (1 recommendation): as screening tool, use the Candida Score and determine multicolonization in high risk patients. (4) Treatment (4 recommendations): start early. Choose echinocandins. Withdraw any central venous catheter. Fundoscopy is needed. (5) De-escalation (1 recommendation): only applied when knowing susceptibility determinations and after 3 days of clinical stability. The higher rate of agreement was achieved in the optimization of microbiological tools and the withdrawal of the catheter, whereas the lower rate corresponded to de-escalation therapy and the use of scores.

CONCLUSIONS

The management of invasive candidiasis in ICU patients requires the application of a broad range of knowledge and skills that we summarize in our recommendations. These recommendations may help to identify the potential patients, standardize their global management and improve their outcomes, based on the DELPHI methodology.

[Épico project: Development of educational recommendations using the DELPHI technique on invasive candidiasis in non-neutropenic critically ill adult patients. Grupo Proyecto Épico]

BACKGROUND

Although there has been an improved management of invasive candidiasis in the last decade, controversial issues still remain, especially in the diagnostic and therapeutic approaches.

AIMS

We sought to identify the core clinical knowledge and to achieve high level agreement recommendations required to care for critically ill adult patients with invasive candidiasis.

METHODS

A prospective Spanish survey reaching consensus by the DELPHI technique was made. It was anonymously conducted by electronic mail in a first term to 25 national multidisciplinary experts in invasive fungal infections from five national scientific societies, including intensivists, anesthesiologists, microbiologists, pharmacologists and infectious diseases specialists, who answered to 47 questions prepared by a coordination group after a strict review of the literature in the last five years. The educational objectives spanned five categories, including epidemiology, diagnostic tools, prediction rules, and treatment and de-escalation approaches. The level of agreement achieved among the panel experts in each item should exceed 75% to be selected. In a second term, after extracting recommendations from the selected items, a face to face meeting was performed where more than 80 specialists in a second round were invited to validate the preselected recommendations.

RESULTS

In the first term, 20 recommendations were preselected (Epidemiology 4, Scores 3, Diagnostic tools 4, Treatment 6 and De-escalation approaches 3). After the second round, the following 12 were validated: (1) Epidemiology (2 recommendations): think about candidiasis in your Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and do not forget that non-Candida albicans-Candida species also exist. (2) Diagnostic tools (4 recommendations): blood cultures should be performed under suspicion every 2-3 days and, if positive, every 3 days until obtaining the first negative result. Obtain sterile fluid and tissue, if possible (direct examination of the sample is important). Use non-culture based methods as microbiological tools, whenever possible. Determination of antifungal susceptibility is mandatory. (3) Scores (1 recommendation): as screening tool, use the Candida Score and determine multicolonization in high risk patients. (4) Treatment (4 recommendations): start early. Choose echinocandins. Withdraw any central venous catheter. Fundoscopy is needed. (5) De-escalation (1 recommendation): only applied when knowing susceptibility determinations and after 3 days of clinical stability. The higher rate of agreement was achieved in the optimization of microbiological tools and the withdrawal of the catheter, whereas the lower rate corresponded to de-escalation therapy and the use of scores.

CONCLUSIONS

The management of invasive candidiasis in ICU patients requires the application of a broad range of knowledge and skills that we summarize in our recommendations. These recommendations may help to identify the potential patients, standardize their global management and improve their outcomes, based on the DELPHI methodology.

[Antifungal treatment options in the critically ill patient]

Invasive fungal infections, especially in the critical care setting, have become an excellent target for prophylactic, empiric, and pre-emptive therapy interventions due to their associated high morbidity, mortality rate, increased incidence, and healthcare costs. For these reasons, new studies and laboratory tests have been developed over the last few years in order to formulate an early therapeutic intervention strategy in an attempt to reduce the high mortality rate associated with these infections. In recent years, evidence-based studies have shown the roles that the new antifungal drugs play in the treatment of invasive mycosis in seriously ill and complex patients, although data from critically ill patients are more limited. New antifungal agents have been analyzed in different clinical situations in critical care units, and the increasing number of non-Candida albicans species suggest that the application of early echinocandin therapy in critically ill patients with invasive candidiasis is a good option. Voriconazole should be recommended for invasive aspergillosis as a first line option.

Épico Project. Development of educational recommendations using the DELPHI technique on invasive candidiasis in non-neutropenic critically ill adult patients

BACKGROUND

Although there has been an improved management of invasive candidiasis in the last decade, controversial issues still remain, especially in the diagnostic and therapeutic approaches.

AIMS

We sought to identify the core clinical knowledge and to achieve high level agreement recommendations required to care for critically ill adult patients with invasive candidiasis.

METHODS

A prospective Spanish survey reaching consensus by the DELPHI technique was made. It was anonymously conducted by electronic mail in a first term to 25 national multidisciplinary experts in invasive fungal infections from five national scientific societies, including intensivists, anesthesiologists, microbiologists, pharmacologists and infectious diseases specialists, who answered to 47 questions prepared by a coordination group after a strict review of the literature in the last five years. The educational objectives spanned five categories, including epidemiology, diagnostic tools, prediction rules, and treatment and de-escalation approaches. The level of agreement achieved among the panel experts in each item should exceed 75% to be selected. In a second term, after extracting recommendations from the selected items, a face to face meeting was performed where more than 80 specialists in a second round were invited to validate the preselected recommendations.

RESULTS

In the first term, 20 recommendations were preselected (Epidemiology 4, Scores 3, Diagnostic tools 4, Treatment 6 and De-escalation approaches 3). After the second round, the following 12 were validated: (1) Epidemiology (2 recommendations): think about candidiasis in your Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and do not forget that non-Candida albicans-Candida species also exist. (2) Diagnostic tools (4 recommendations): blood cultures should be performed under suspicion every 2-3 days and, if positive, every 3 days until obtaining the first negative result. Obtain sterile fluid and tissue, if possible (direct examination of the sample is important). Use non-culture based methods as microbiological tools, whenever possible. Determination of antifungal susceptibility is mandatory. (3) Scores (1 recommendation): as screening tool, use the Candida Score and determine multicolonization in high risk patients. (4) Treatment (4 recommendations): start early. Choose echinocandins. Withdraw any central venous catheter. Fundoscopy is needed. (5) De-escalation (1 recommendation): only applied when knowing susceptibility determinations and after 3 days of clinical stability. The higher rate of agreement was achieved in the optimization of microbiological tools and the withdrawal of the catheter, whereas the lower rate corresponded to de-escalation therapy and the use of scores.

CONCLUSIONS

The management of invasive candidiasis in ICU patients requires the application of a broad range of knowledge and skills that we summarize in our recommendations. These recommendations may help to identify the potential patients, standardize their global management and improve their outcomes, based on the DELPHI methodology.

Does the current treatment of invasive fungal infection need to be reviewed?

Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) are becoming more frequent due to the increasing number of patients at risk. Over the last decade, their prognosis has improved with the diagnostic and therapeutic advances, including new antifungals. In the two years, from 2007 to 2009, antifungal consumption increased by 27%, 67 times more than antibacterial consumption, albeit with great differences between hospitals. The scientific evidence of the indications for antifungal prophylaxis and targeted antifungal therapy is strong; however, it is weak for empirical antifungal therapy, which is the most common indication. Antifungals are not harmless, since they are associated with a wide range of adverse effects and drug interactions, favor the development of resistance, contribute to other fungal superinfections and cause significant healthcare spending. Therefore, the question arises whether this extraordinary increase in consumption is justified, whether the use of antifungals is optimal, or whether it is necessary to reconsider the current treatment of IFIs instead.

[Candida peritonitis: Prevalence and risk factors]

BACKGROUND

A peritoneal fluid with a positive culture for Candida in patients with associated clinical symptoms enables peritoneal candidiasis (PC) to be diagnosed. This etiology is related to a poor prognosis, thus, it is important to know all the risk factors and to start early an empirical treatment. The risk factors associated with this kind of peritonitis are to receive prolonged antibiotic treatment, nosocomial infection, female gender, involvement of the upper gastro-intestinal (UGI) tract, and the ocurrence of an intraoperative cardiovascular failure (CVF).

AIMS

The principal aim was to determine the prevalence of PC in our hospital, and the secondary aims to determine the associated risk factors.

METHODS

We obtained samples from 74 patients diagnosed with peritonitis, consecutively from 2007 to 2010. Cultures were performed with the free peritoneal fluid aspirated during surgery.

RESULTS

The prevalence of PC obtained in our hospital was 17.6%, from which 46.15% corresponded to Candida albicans. The involvement of the UGI tract and the onset of CVF can be considered risk factors for the development of this pathology. Age, gender, nosocomial infection and previous antibiotic treatment were not related to this pathology.

CONCLUSIONS

Our prevalence of PC is 17.6%. The risk factors that could predispose are the involvement of the UGI tract as the cause of peritonitis, and CVF during surgical procedure.

Fungal infection in solid organ recipients

In solid organ recipients, as with other immunosuppressed patients, infections by Candida spp. and Aspergillus spp. are the most frequent invasive mycoses. Infections by Cryptococcus spp. and fungi of the Mucorales order are less common. Infections by Fusarium spp. and Scedosporium spp. are very uncommon, except in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplant and patients with prolonged neutropenia. The risk factors for fungal infection are immunosuppression, surgery, viral co-infection, and environmental exposure. Diagnosis is challenging: blood culture is of little use, except in candidiasis and cryptococcosis, and the poor accuracy of antigen-based techniques, except in cryptococcosis, favors widespread use of empirical therapy. A delay in the initiation of therapy increases the already high mortality of these infections. The agents used to treat fungal infection are azoles, echinocandins, and lipid amphotericin. Administration depends on antifungal activity, drug-drug interactions with calcineurin inhibitors, and safety profiles (effects on grafts and other side effects).

[Invasive fungal infection in critically ill patients]

The most common organism implicated in fungal infections in the critically ill patients is Candida spp. C. albicans continues to be the species that causes the largest number of invasive candidiasis. In critically ill patients, Candida spp. are frequently isolated in non-sterile sites. Candida colonization is documented in nearly 60% of non-neutropenic critically ill patients staying more than one week in the ICU. However, only 5% of colonized patients will develop invasive candidiasis. The diagnosis of invasive non-candidemic candidiasis remains elusive in the majority of the patients. Candida in a blood culture should never be viewed as a contaminant and should always prompt treatment initiation. Patients with multifocal colonization with a Candida score >3 should also receive antifungal therapy. Fluconazole is reserved for non-severely ill patients without recent exposure to azoles. The use of an echinocandin is recommended for hemodynamically unstable patients or with a history of recent fluconazole exposure.

[Invasive candidiasis in a lung retransplantation recipient]

BACKGROUND

Lung-graft loss is a potential problem for the majority of lung-transplant recipients. Retransplantation could be a treatment option, despite significant morbidity and mortality due to infectious complications. The epidemiology, clinical presentation and early treatment are still the basis of the overall approach to the fungal invasive infection after repeated transplant.

CLINICAL CASE

This is the case of a 29 year-old woman who underwent a left lung retransplantation due to bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome and developed Candida albicans invasive disease. She received the usual prophylaxis with nebulized liposomal amphotericin B and was also treated with anidulafungin. She received corticosteroid therapy and plasma exchange as acute lung transplant rejection was suspected with subsequent progressive deterioration and death. In the culture of blood samples yeasts were isolated, later identified as C. albicans resistant to fluconazole, caspofungin and micafungin (MCI 128 μg/ml, 8 μg/ml, 4 μg/ml, respectively) and susceptible to anidulafungin and amphotericin B (MCI 0.25 μg/ml, 0.5 μg/ml, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The empirical management of acute transplant rejection with corticosteroid boluses and plasma exchange can help to spread the underlying and undiagnosed fungal infection. It is considered that an increase in the regular dose of anidulafungin is necessary after plasma exchange. To date, fungal echinocandin resistance did not seem to be a major cause for concern in the treatment of patients with invasive mycoses. However, there is increasing evidence of natural and acquired resistance resulting in life-threatening infections and clinical failure.

[Candida peritonitis in a haemodynamically stable patient. First choice of antifungal treatment … fluconazole?]

BACKGROUND

Candida peritonitis in postoperative patients is an independent predictor of mortality. Empirical early antifungal therapy should be started in these patients, since according to the results of studies in patients with candidemia, this has an impact on the prognosis. The treatment recommended by clinical practice guidelines in patients with haemodynamic instability are candins, but they do not make explicit recommendations for patients with dysfunction of other organs, or high lactate levels.

CASE REPORT

A case of rescue treatment with anidulafungin in a patient with candidemia and Candida glabrata peritonitis postoperative haemodynamically stable, but with an acute renal failure and elevated plasma lactate, is reported. We discuss the antifungal treatment recommendations established by clinical practice guidelines.

CONCLUSIONS

One conclusion based on this case is that the haemodynamic instability as a marker of severe sepsis must be equated with dysfunction of any organ and/or a plasma lactate level ≥ 2.5 mmol/l in order to advocate candins as an antifungal treatment. In addition, it should be emphasised that anidulafungin was effective in a clinically difficult patient with candidemia and Candida peritonitis, even when used as late rescue antifungal treatment.

[Clinical features of critically ill patients with invasive fungal infection]

BACKGROUND

Invasive fungal infection (IFI) is an entity that encompasses different types of infections caused by different types of those fungi pathogenic for humans. In the setting of critically ill patients with multiple and often-concurrent risk factors and comorbidities the most common are those caused by the Candida and Aspergillus species. Among the characteristics of IFI in critically ill patients, three aspects can be highlighted: those related to the host (e.g.: risk factors, clinical severity), those related with the pathogen (sensitivity, virulence), or those concerning antifungal treatment (spectrum, features PK / PD, safety, interactions). The fungus that most often causes an IFI in critically ill patients is Candida; the most common type infections are candidemia, Candida peritonitis and catheter-related infections. In recent years new antifungal treatments have expanded the therapeutic options, with echinocandins as a clear choice, often the first in the latest guidelines in critically ill patients with IFI.

CASE REPORT

We report the case of a critically ill patient having the most common risk factors, multiple organ dysfunction and development of an IFI. The complexity of establishing an antifungal treatment from the moment of its inception, its setting, and the considerations of the different therapeutic possibilities according to organ dysfunction of the patient are discussed. The antifungal treatment options mentioned in the current guidelines and recommendations are also evaluated.

CONCLUSIONS

The most common fungal infection in critically ill patients is invasive candidiasis, with candidemia or candida peritonitis being the most frequent clinical presentations. Candins have brought new possibilities for treating these complex patients due to their good safety profile and clinical efficacy.

[Laboratory diagnosis of fungal infection diseases]

A number of newer diagnostic procedures have been developed over the last few years as alternatives to conventional microbiological methods to detect invasive fungal diseases (IFD). This text reviews the performance of alternative methods in clinical settings, and their accuracy compared with that of microscopical examination and microbiological cultures. Some newer techniques considered as complementary and experimental procedures are also reviewed. The text is divided into three sections, including Candida infections, aspergillosis and infections due to rare and emerging fungal species.

Recurrent episodes of candidemia due to Candida glabrata with a mutation in hot spot 1 of the FKS2 gene developed after prolonged therapy with caspofungin

We report two episodes of recurrent candidemia caused by echinocandin-resistant Candida glabrata in a 69-year-old patient who underwent repeated abdominal surgery. In the first episode of candidemia, an echinocandin-susceptible Candida glabrata strain was isolated, and the patient was treated with caspofungin. The isolates from the later episodes showed resistance to echinocandins. Analysis of the HS1 region of the FKS2 gene showed the amino acid substitution S663P. Microsatellite analysis demonstrated a strong genetic relationship between the isolates.

[Antifungal therapy update: new drugs and medical uses]

Increases in the rates of fungal infections, as well as their associated morbidity and mortality has led to a need for additional antifungal agents. The most common serious fungal agents in immunosuppressed and critically ill patients are Candida spp. and Aspergillus spp., although other emerging fungi must be considered. Rational, early systemic antifungal treatment should be based on diagnostic imaging techniques and conventional mycological and non-culture-based procedures. While the availability of new therapeutic options is an important advance, antifungal therapy has become increasingly complex. In addition to the available antifungal armamentarium, recent research has resulted in the introduction of three new antifungal agents: micafungin, anidulafungin, and posaconazole. This article provides an update, based on the latest scientific evidence, of the clinical efficacy, pharmacokinetics, safety and dosing of antifungal drugs administered in the management of Candida spp., Aspergillus spp., Cryptococcus spp., Zygomycetes, Scedosporium spp. and Fusarium spp.

[Invasive fungal disease: conventional or molecular mycological diagnosis?]

Diagnosis of invasive mycoses is a difficult challenge due to the limitations and low sensitivity of traditional microbiology methods which lead to diagnostic and therapeutic delays. The aim of this review is to summarise the state of the art of the molecular diagnosis of invasive fungal disease and to clarify its current role in the clinical practice. Conventional microbiological methods could be complemented with molecular methods in the rapid and definitive identification of fungal isolates. Biomarkers (β-glucan, galactomannan) are very useful in immunocompromised patients and have been included as probable invasive mycoses by the EORTC/MSG. Nucleic acid detection is currently used as a complementary tool for diagnosis. However, PCR can be very useful in mould invasive mycoses. Finally, the combined detection using biomarkers can improve the diagnosis. However, their applicability in the microbiology laboratory is not so easy and further studies are required for the appropriate evaluation of its clinical usefulness.