Feasibility of radiation therapy in patients 90years of age and older: A French multicentre analysis

A Comparative Study of Radical Radiotherapy in Very Elderly and Non-Very Elderly Patients With Malignant Tumour Using Pairwise Matching

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to compare the outcomes and complications following radical radiotherapy between very elderly patients aged ≥ 90 years and non-very elderly patients using pairwise matching analysis.

METHODS

Data of patients who underwent radical radiotherapy at our hospital between January 2013 and March 2024 and those who were aged ≥ 90 years at the start of radical radiotherapy were extracted. Data of control patients were extracted by pairwise matching from patients aged < 90 years who underwent radical radiotherapy during the same period. Pairwise matching was performed using the following criteria: (i) cancer type, (ii) TNM classification, (iii) histological type, (iv) concurrent chemotherapy, (v) prescribed biological effective dose, (vi) performance status, (vii) sex and (viii) ability to walk. The local control (LC), cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) rates were calculated from the date of completion of radiotherapy.

RESULTS

Forty patients from each group were analysed. There were no significant differences in LC, CSS or OS rates between the two groups. The completion rate of radiotherapy and the incidence rate of adverse events were not significantly different between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

In this study, there was no difference in the outcomes of radiotherapy between very elderly and non-very elderly patients. Our findings may aid clinicians in the treatment of nonagenarian patients.

Extreme hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for elderly prostate cancer patients: side effects preliminary analysis of a phase II trial

PURPOSE

Aim of this study is to evaluate safety and efficacy of SBRT in elderly patients affected by localized prostate cancer (PC).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Men aged 70 years or older were enrolled and analyzed. The SBRT schedule was 35 Gy in 5 fractions administered in 1-2 weeks. According to risk group, androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) was prescribed. Urinary symptoms were evaluated at baseline using the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS). Genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities were assessed at the end of treatment, 2 weeks after SBRT and during follow-up using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). PSA values were recorded before treatment and during follow-up as biochemical response criteria.

RESULTS

Between 07/2019 and 09/2021, 111 patients were enrolled. Median age was 77 years. At the end of treatment, no acute GU/GI toxicities ≥ G2 were observed. At 2-3 weeks after treatment, 3 patients reported G2 GU toxicity, while 14 patients referred G2 GI toxicity. During the last follow up, 26 and 2 patients reported, respectively, G1 and G2 GU toxicity, while 22 and 1 cases described, respectively, G1 and G2 GI toxicity. No late toxicities ≥ G3 were recorded. GU toxicity is related to absence of urethra sparing, increasing PTV volume, Dmax PTV and IPSS; GI toxicity is related to RT schedule (each other day is better than consecutive day), Dmax rectum and IPSS, At a median follow-up of 24 months, excellent biochemical disease control was achieved in all cases with median PSA of 0.5 ng/ml.

CONCLUSION

SBRT in elderly patients affected by PC is feasible and well tolerated with excellent biochemical disease control. Longer follow-up is needed to assess late toxicity profile and long-term clinical outcome.

Factors affecting radiotherapy utilisation in geriatric oncology patients in NSW, Australia

Background and Purpose

Large non-age-specific radiotherapy utilisation rate (RTU) studies have demonstrated that actual RTU is below the optimal recommended utilisation rate for both curative and palliative intent radiotherapy indications. The optimal utilisation rate for the geriatric oncology cohort of patients has not yet been determined. The purpose of this research was to examine the actual RTU for patients treated in New South Wales (NSW), Australia as a function of increasing age, and the relationship between RTU and tumour site, travelling distance and socio-economic status.

Materials & Methods

NSW Central Cancer Registry data (2009-2011) were linked to the NSW Radiotherapy Dataset (2009-2012). RTU was calculated for patients aged <80 years and ≥80 years. RTU was defined as the proportion of patients receiving at least a single course of radiotherapy within 12 months of a cancer diagnosis.

Results

110,645 patients were diagnosed with cancer, of whom 27,721 received at least one course of radiotherapy. The overall RTU was 25%. RTU for patients aged <80 years was 28% compared to 14% for patients aged 80+ years (p < 0.001). On both univariate and multivariate analysis, increasing age, residential address in disadvantaged socioeconomic areas and increasing distance to the nearest radiotherapy department were associated with a reduction in RTU.

Conclusion

Geriatric oncology patients are less likely to receive radiotherapy than their younger counterparts. Some of the reduction in RTU may be justifiable on the basis of limited life expectancy and co-morbidity. Further research is required to determine the co-morbidity adjusted optimal RTU in older patients.

External beam radiation therapy in a centenarian with primary liver cancer: A case report

RATIONALE

Due to unprecedented global aging, the number of elderly and super-elderly patients with cancer is increasing. However, restricted by comorbidities or fragility, many elderly patients are considered ineligible to receive invasive therapies. A centenarian with primary liver cancer (PLC) was treated by external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). This rare case deserves our attention.

PATIENT CONCERNS

We present a rare case of a centenarian with PLC. The super-elderly male patient complained that 2 liver lesions were found by abdominal ultrasonography in June 2016.

DIAGNOSES

The Segment 7 (S7) lesion and the Segment 5/8 (S5/8) lesion were clinically diagnosed as PLC successively.

INTERVENTIONS

The S7 lesion was considered PLC initially and treated by EBRT in October 2016. In the 1-year follow-up after EBRT, the S7 lesion was well controlled. Unfortunately, the S5/8 lesion had increased in size, was diagnosed as PLC and subsequently treated by CyberKnife in another hospital. However, local failure of the S5/8 lesion was suggested 15 months after CyberKnife. At the age of 102 years, the patient received re-irradiation for the S5/8 lesion.

OUTCOMES

Three months after re-irradiation, des-γ-carboxy-prothrombin decreased to normal; no significant change in the S5/8 lesion was found in Magnetic Resonance Imaging. No severe acute or late toxicities were reported after each course of EBRT. Unfortunately, the patient died of respiratory failure caused by severe pneumonia in mid-March 2020.

CONCLUSION

Advanced age is not a contraindication for elderly patients with cancer to receive radiotherapy and even re-irradiation.

How to improve clinical research in a department of radiation oncology

INTRODUCTION

Radiation therapy is a core modality for cancer treatment. Around 40% of cancer cures include the use of radiotherapy, either as a single strategy or combined with other treatments. In the past decade, substantial technical advances and novel insights into radiobiological properties have considerably improved patients' outcomes. This study overviewed the landscape of clinical research at our radiotherapy department.

METHODS

We surveyed our institutional database of clinical trials to collect information for completed or ongoing radiation therapy clinical trials, from 2005 to December 2017 at the Lucien Neuwirth cancer institute.

RESULTS

A total of 31 clinical trials were undertaken during the study period, of which 4 studies (12.9%) were industry-sponsored and 3 studies (9.7%) were launched by our radiotherapy unit. The vast majority of clinical trials (83.9%) were dedicated to unique organ localization, especially urological cancer (prostate or bladder) (42%). We also observed a shift towards more phase II trials during the study period as well as a special focus on elderly population. Over the last decade, the number of included patients increased by a 5.3 fold input, with 135 inclusions before 2011 and 720 inclusions after 2011.

DISCUSSION

This study provided an observational and comprehensive analysis of radiotherapy research. From a monocentric point-of-view, these results reflected the on-going progress of worldwide radiotherapy research. Based on a 13-years' experience, this study aimed at highlighting essential cues to ensure efficient and perennial research.

Radiotherapy for nonagenarians: the value of biological versus chronological age

Background

The number of nonagenarian cancer patients (≥ 90 years) is continuously increasing, and radiotherapy is performed in a relevant proportion of patients, as surgery and chemotherapy are often not feasible for these patients. However, the evidence regarding the feasibility and treatment outcomes after radiotherapy for this patient group is very limited.

Methods

All nonagenarian patients receiving (chemo) radiotherapy between 2009 and 2019 at the University of Freiburg - Medical Center were analyzed for patterns of care, overall survival (OS) and therapy-associated toxicities according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. Uni- and multivariate Cox regression analyses were conducted to assess the influence of patient- and treatment-related factors on patient outcomes.

Results

One hundred nineteen patients with a total of 137 irradiated lesions were included in this analysis. After a median follow-up of 27 months, median OS was 10 months with a 3-year OS amounting to 11.1%. Univariate analyses demonstrated that a reduced performance status (HR = 1.56, 95% CI 1.00–2.45, p < 0.05), a higher burden of comorbidities (HR = 2.00, 95% CI 1.00–4.10, p < 0.05) and higher UICC tumor stages (HR = 2.21, 95% CI 1.14–4.26, p < 0.05) were associated with impaired survival rates. Split-course treatments (HR = 2.05, 95% CI 1.07–3.94, p < 0.05), non-completion of radiotherapy (HR = 7.17, 95% CI 3.88–13.26, p < 0.001) and palliative treatments (HR = 2.84, 95% CI 1.68–4.81, p < 0.05) were found to result in significantly reduced OS. In the multivariate analysis, split-course concepts (HR = 2.21, 95% CI 1.10–4.37, p < 0.05) and palliative treatments (HR = 3.19, 95% CI 1.77–5.75, p < 0.001) significantly deteriorated outcomes, while impaired ECOG status (HR = 1.49, 95% CI 0.91–2.43, p = 0.11) did not. The vast majority of patients reported either no (n = 40; 33.6%) or grade 1–2 acute toxicities (n = 66; 55.5%), and only very few higher-grade toxicities were observed in our study.

Conclusion

Radiotherapy for nonagenarian patients is generally feasible and associated with a low toxicity profile. Given the relatively poor OS rates and the importance of the quality of life for this patient group, individualized treatment regimens including hypofractionation concepts should be considered.

Feasibility and safety of 1.5 T MR-guided and daily adapted abdominal-pelvic SBRT for elderly cancer patients: geriatric assessment tools and preliminary patient-reported outcomes

BACKGROUND

We present preliminary data of the first older cancer patients treated with Hybrid Linac for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) consisting of 1.5 T MRI-guided and daily-adapted treatment. The aim was to assess feasibility, safety and the role of G8 and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) questionnaires in predicting patients' QoL, evaluated by patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).

METHODS

Two groups of patients with localized prostate cancer or abdominal-pelvic oligometastases were analyzed. SBRT schedule consisted of 35 Gy delivered in 5 fractions. The primary endpoint was to measure the impact of G8 and CCI on PROMs. Both G8 and the CCI were performed at baseline, while the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) for PROMs assessment was prospectively performed at baseline and after SBRT.

RESULTS

Forty older patients were analyzed. The median age was 73 years (range 65-85). For the entire population, the median G8 score was 15 (10-17) and the median CCI score was 6 (4-11). Concerning the PROMS, the EORTC-QLQ C30 questionnaire reported no difference between the pre- and post-SBRT evaluation in all patients, except for the fatigue item that declined after SBRT, especially in the group of patients with a G8 score < 15 and with age < 75 years (p = 0.049). No grade 3 or higher acute toxicity occurred.

CONCLUSION

This is the first report documenting for older cancer patients that 1.5 T MRI-guided daily-adapted SBRT is feasible, safe and does not impact on the QoL at the end of treatment. Longer follow-up is advocated to report long-term outcomes.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Date of approval April 2019 and numbered MRI/LINAC no. 23748.

Moderate hypofractionated helical tomotherapy for prostate cancer in a cohort of older patients: a mono-institutional report of toxicity and clinical outcomes

PURPOSE OR OBJECTIVE

To evaluate toxicity and outcomes of moderately hypofractionated helical tomotherapy for the curative treatment of a cohort of patients aged ≥ 75 years with localized prostate cancer (PC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From January 2013 to February 2017, 95 patients with median age 77 years (range 75-88) were treated for PC. 39% were low risk, 33% intermediate risk (IR), 28% high risk (HR). Median iPSA was 9.42 ng/ml (1.6-107). Androgen deprivation was prescribed according to NCCN recommendations. All patients received 70 Gy in 28 fractions to the prostate; 61.6 Gy were delivered to the seminal vesicles for IR; whole pelvis irradiation with a total dose of 50.4 Gy was added in the HR group. Toxicity evaluation was based on CTCAE V4.0 criteria, biochemical failure was defined following Phoenix criteria. Quality of Life was assessed with the EPIC-26 index. Overall survival and biochemical failure-free survival were analysed with Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 36 months (range 24-73), acute and late toxicity were acceptable. No correlation between toxicity patterns and clinical or dosimetric parameter was registered. EPIC-26 showed a negligible difference in urinary and bowel function post-treatment that did not reach statistical significance. The 2- and 3-years OS were 93% and 87% with cancer specific survival of 97.9% and 96.2%.

CONCLUSION

Moderate hypofractionated RT reported excellent outcomes in our cohort of older patients. Shorter schedules may be proposed regardless of chronological age facilitating the treatment compliance in the older population.

Feasibility of radiotherapy in nonagenarian patients: a retrospective study

PURPOSE

Specific information about radiation therapy in nonagenarians is limited. In order to shed more light on the feasibility of radiotherapy in this challenging subgroup, a retrospective study was performed.

METHODS

The data of 93 consecutive patients receiving irradiation treatment at the Department of Radiation Oncology, Ordensklinikum Linz Barmherzige Schwestern between June 2005 and December 2016 were analyzed. Patient- and treatment-related factors were extracted from the patient records. Overall survival (OS) was defined as time from irradiation to death or last follow-up. The survival rates were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test.

RESULTS

The study population of 93 patients was between 90 and 99 years old (median 91 years). It included 59 women (63%) and 34 men (37%). Of these, 38 (41%) received definitive radiotherapy, 14 (15%) received neoadjuvant or adjuvant radiotherapy, whereas a palliative regimen was prescribed in 44% of the cases (n = 41). In all, 79 patients (85%) were able to complete their prescribed course of radiotherapy. While 16 (17%) patients reported grade 2 toxicities or higher, 4 had ≥grade 3 side effects (4%). The median survival was significantly higher in patients treated with adjuvant, neoadjuvant or definitive radiotherapy (13.8 months) compared to patients treated with palliative radiotherapy (3.6 months; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Even in patients managed without preradiotherapy comprehensive geriatric assessment, carefully planned fractionated radiotherapy was feasible and resulted in acceptable rates of acute toxicities.

Radiotherapy of rectal cancer in elderly patients: Real-world data assessment in a decade

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

There is paucity of data on the efficacy and toxicity of radiotherapy in rectal cancer (RC) elderly patients. The objective was to identify management strategies and resulting outcomes in RC patients ≥70 years undergoing radiotherapy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective study included consecutive RC patients ≥70 years undergoing rectal radiotherapy.

RESULTS

From 2004-2015, 340 RC patients underwent pre-operative (n = 238; 70%), post-operative (n = 41, 12%), or exclusive (n = 61, 18%) radiotherapy, with a median age of 78.5 years old (range: 70-96). Radiotherapy protocols were tailored, with 54 different radiotherapy programs (alteration of the total dose, and/or fractionation, and/or volume). Median follow-up was 27.1 months. Acute and late grade 3-4 radio-induced toxicities were reported in 3.5% and 0.9% of patients. Metastatic setting (OR = 6.60, CI95% 1.47-46.03, p = 0.02), exclusive radiotherapy (OR = 5.08, CI95% 1.48-18.21, p = 0.009), and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (OR = 6.42, CI95% 1.31-24.73, p = 0.01) were associated with grade ≥3 acute toxicities in univariate analysis. Exclusive radiotherapy (OR = 9.79, CI95% 2.49-43.18, p = 0.001) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (OR = 12.62, CI95% 2.05-71.26, p = 0.003) were independent predictive factors of grade ≥3 acute toxicities in multivariate analysis. A complete pathological response was achieved in 12 out of 221 pre-operative patients (5.4%). Age, tumor stage, and surgery were independent predictive factors of survival in multivariate analysis. At end of follow-up, 7.1% of patients experienced local relapse.

CONCLUSION

Radiotherapy for RC in elderly patients appeared safe and manageable, perhaps due to the tailoring of radiotherapy protocols. Tailored management resulted in acceptable rate of local tumor control.

The Changing Paradigm of Radiotherapy in the Elderly Population

There is increasing awareness of the special needs for care of the elderly cancer patient. Newer precise conformal radiotherapy techniques allow the safe delivery of higher doses of radiotherapy to the target tumor while reducing the dose to surrounding critical organs. This has led to a shortening of radiotherapy protocols for both curative and palliative indications. We review these novel techniques and protocols and the published clinical studies that include elderly patients treated with these techniques. Despite the fact that the elderly are a growing significant proportion of cancer patients, and the need for radiotherapy in the elderly is expected to rise with increasing life expectancy, they are underrepresented in most clinical studies of radiotherapy, and there are few studies specifically investigating radiotherapy in the elderly. The treatment of early-stage primary lung cancer with stereotactic body radiotherapy is a prime example how new highly conformal techniques and shortened treatment protocols are changing the approach to radiotherapy in the elderly. With improved imaging and radiotherapy treatment precision, it is expected that such techniques will become increasingly used in other cancer sites. It is important for radiation oncologists to be aware of the special needs of the elderly cancer patient and in particular to assess these patients based on functional status and not only chronological age. In addition, geriatric oncologists should be aware of modern radiotherapy techniques that can be particularly appropriate for the elderly patient.

Navigating the highlights of phase III trials: a watchful eye on evidence-based radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

Phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the cornerstone of evidence-based oncology. However, there is no exhaustive review describing the radiotherapy RTCs characteristics. The objective of the present study was to describe features of all phase III RCTs including at least a radiation therapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Requests were performed in the Medline database (via PubMed). The latest update was performed in April 2016, using the following MESH terms: 'clinical trials: phase III as topic', 'radiotherapy', 'brachytherapy', as keywords.

RESULTS

A total of 454 phase III RCTs were identified. Studies were mainly based on open (92.1%) multicenter (77.5%) designs, analyzed in intend to treat (67.6%), aiming at proving superiority (91.6%) through overall survival assessment (46.5%). Most frequently studied malignancies were head and neck (21.8%), lung (14.3%) and prostate cancers (9.9%). Patients were mainly recruited with a locally advanced disease (73.7%). Median age was 59 years old. Out of 977 treatment arms, 889 arms experienced radiotherapy, mainly using 3D-conformal radiotherapy (288 arms, 32.4%). Intensity-modulated techniques were tested in 12 arms (1.3%). The intervention was a non-cytotoxic agent addition in 89 studies (19.6%), a radiation dose/fractionation modification in 74 studies (16.3%), a modification of chemotherapy regimen in 63 studies (13.9%), a chemotherapy addition in 63 studies (13.9%) and a radiotherapy addition in 53 trials (11.7%). With a median follow-up of 50 months, acute all-grade and grade 3-5 toxicities were reported in 49.6% and 69.4% of studies, respectively. Radiotherapy technique, follow-up and late toxicities were reported in 60.1%, 74%, and 31.1% of studies, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Phase III randomized controlled trials featured severe limitations, since a third did not report radiotherapy technique, follow-up or late toxicities. The fast-paced technological evolution creates a discrepancy between literature and radiotherapy techniques performed in daily-routine, suggesting that phase III methodology needs to be reinvented.

Disparities in Receipt of Radiotherapy and Survival by Age, Sex, and Ethnicity among Patient with Stage I Follicular Lymphoma

Background

Radiotherapy (RT) is a first-line treatment option for stage I follicular lymphoma (FL). We studied disparities in receipt of RT and survival among patients with stage I FL.

Methods

Adult patients (age ≥18 years) with stage I FL, as the first primary cancer, diagnosed between 1992 and 2007 were identified using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) 18 database. Study population was divided into various subgroups based on age, sex, race, and marital status. Factors associated with receipt of RT and survival, among patients receiving RT, was evaluated using regression analysis and Cox PH modeling, respectively. SEER*Stat was used to compute 1- and 5-year RS for various subgroups and compared using Z score.

Results

Of the total 7315 patients (median age: 64 years), 2671 (36.5%) received RT. African-Americans, older age group, and single and separated/divorced/widow marital status predicted omission of RT. The 1- and 5-year RS were significantly better in patients receiving RT. In multivariate analysis, male sex, age <60 years, Caucasian race, and married marital status were found to be independent predictor of better RS among patients receiving RT (P < 0.0001).

Conclusion

This study showed that 36.5% patients with stage I FL received RT. Survival rates were significantly better for patients who received RT.

Hypofractionated radiation therapy for treatment of bladder carcinoma in patients aged 90 years and more: A new paradigm to be explored?

INTRODUCTION

There are only scarce data on the optimal management of patients who present with a bladder carcinoma and who are aged 90 years and older.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed records from radiotherapy departments from two university hospitals, two private centers and one public center to identify patients who underwent radiotherapy for bladder cancer over the past decade and who were aged 90 years or older. From 2003 to 2013, 14 patients aged 90 years or older receiving RT for bladder malignant tumors were identified.

RESULTS

Mean age was 92.7 years. Ten patients (71 %) had a general health status altered (PS 2-3) at the beginning of RT. A total of 14 RT courses were delivered, including six treatments (43 %) with curative intent and eight treatments (57 %) with palliative intent. Palliative intent mainly encompassed hemostatic RT (36 %). At last follow-up, two patients (14 %) experienced complete response, one patient (7 %) experienced partial response, three patients (21 %) had their disease stable, and three patients (21 %) experienced tumor progression, of whom two patients with the progression of symptoms. There was no reported high-grade acute local toxicity in 14 patients (100 %). One patient experienced delayed grade 2 toxicity with pain and lower urinary tract symptoms. At last follow-up, seven patients (50 %) were deceased. Cancer was the cause of death for five patients.

CONCLUSION

Hypofractionated radiotherapy remains feasible for nonagenarians with bladder cancer. Further investigations including analysis of geriatric comorbidities and impact of treatments on quality of life should be conducted.

[Elderly patients and radiotherapy: A short review]

The ageing of French population imposes to radiotherapists the challenge to treat older patients and to adjust their treatment. Unthinkable 30 years ago, radiation therapy concerns nowadays patients aged more than 90 years old. Oncogeriatric scales have been improved those last years without necessarily making sure that the right treatment is given to the right patient: if oncogeriatric scales use influences the final therapeutic decision, it does not define new target volumes, new doses, or new fractionation protocols. Except for some organs, there is not, for the moment, any consensus concerning geriatric population adapted treatments. This makes any therapeutic decision difficult. The present review has for objective to realise a report of the studies about favorable and unfavorable effects of radiation therapy amongst aged (>70 years old) or very aged (>90years old) population.