Meta-analyses of phase 3 randomised controlled trials of third generation aromatase inhibitors versus tamoxifen as first-line endocrine therapy in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer

Evaluation of dermatologic adverse events associated with aromatase inhibitors: insights from the FAERS database

Background

This study evaluates the risk of dermatologic adverse events (AEs) associated with aromatase inhibitors (AIs) through an analysis of data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).

Methods

FAERS data from Q1 2004 to Q2 2024 were analyzed for dermatologic AEs related to AIs. A disproportionality analysis using reporting odds ratio (ROR) assessed AE risk, and the time to onset of these AEs was examined.

Results

Out of 21,035,995 AE reports, 2,237 involved skin impairment. Sixty-one preferred terms (PTs) presented positive signals, including nail disorders, onychoclasis, and abnormal hair growth in patients on anastrozole, exemestane, or letrozole. The highest associations were with pseudo cellulitis (ROR = 57.73), anhidrosis (ROR = 48.68), and nail toxicity (ROR = 38.40). Strong associations were observed for anastrozole (ROR = 1.07, 95% confidence interval: 1.03-1.11) and exemestane (ROR = 1.1, 95% CI: 1.04-1.16), but not for letrozole. Eleven dermatologic PTs had onset times under 50 days, with the earliest at 2 days; the latest, skin ulcer, appeared at 241.5 days with exemestane.

Conclusion

The findings provide substantial evidence of dermatologic AEs associated with AIs, particularly anastrozole and exemestane, emphasizing the importance of dermatologic monitoring during AI therapy and the need for further research into AI-induced dermatologic AEs.

Interaction between Estrogen Receptors and p53: A Broader Role for Tamoxifen?

Tamoxifen is one of the most widely used anticancer drugs in the world. It is a safe drug with generally well-tolerated side effects and has been prescribed for the treatment of early-stage and advanced-stage or metastatic estrogen receptor α (ERα/ESR1)-positive breast cancer. Tamoxifen therapy also provides a 38% reduction of the risk of developing breast cancer in women at high risk. With the advent of newer medications targeting ERα-positive breast cancer, tamoxifen is now mainly used as adjuvant therapy for lower-risk premenopausal breast cancer and cancer prevention. It is widely accepted that tamoxifen as a selective estrogen receptor modulator exerts its therapeutic effect by competitively binding to ERα, leading to the recruitment of corepressors and inhibition of transcription of genes involved in the proliferation of breast cancer epithelium. As such, expression of ERα in breast tumors has been considered necessary for tumors to be responsive to tamoxifen therapy. However, ERα-independent effects of tamoxifen in various in vitro and in vivo contexts have been reported over the years. Importantly, the recent discovery that ERα and estrogen receptor β (ERβ/ESR2) can bind tumor suppressor protein p53 with functional consequences has provided new insights into the mechanisms underlying response to tamoxifen therapy and resistance. Furthermore, these findings have paved the way for broadening the use of tamoxifen by potentially repurposing it to treat triple negative (negative for ERα, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, and progesterone receptor) breast cancer. Herein, we summarize these developments and discuss their mechanistic underpinnings and clinical implications.

A triple hormone receptor ER, AR, and VDR signature is a robust prognosis predictor in breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Despite evidence indicating the dominance of cell-of-origin signatures in molecular tumor patterns, translating these genome-wide patterns into actionable insights has been challenging. This study introduces breast cancer cell-of-origin signatures that offer significant prognostic value across all breast cancer subtypes and various clinical cohorts, compared to previously developed genomic signatures.

METHODS

We previously reported that triple hormone receptor (THR) co-expression patterns of androgen (AR), estrogen (ER), and vitamin D (VDR) receptors are maintained at the protein level in human breast cancers. Here, we developed corresponding mRNA signatures (THR-50 and THR-70) based on these patterns to categorize breast tumors by their THR expression levels. The THR mRNA signatures were evaluated across 56 breast cancer datasets (5040 patients) using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, Cox proportional hazard regression, and unsupervised clustering.

RESULTS

The THR signatures effectively predict both overall and progression-free survival across all evaluated datasets, independent of subtype, grade, or treatment status, suggesting improvement over existing prognostic signatures. Furthermore, they delineate three distinct ER-positive breast cancer subtypes with significant survival in differences-expanding on the conventional two subtypes. Additionally, coupling THR-70 with an immune signature identifies a predominantly ER-negative breast cancer subgroup with a highly favorable prognosis, comparable to ER-positive cases, as well as an ER-negative subgroup with notably poor outcome, characterized by a 15-fold shorter survival.

CONCLUSIONS

The THR cell-of-origin signature introduces a novel dimension to breast cancer biology, potentially serving as a robust foundation for integrating additional prognostic biomarkers. These signatures offer utility as a prognostic index for stratifying existing breast cancer subtypes and for de novo classification of breast cancer cases. Moreover, THR signatures may also hold promise in predicting hormone treatment responses targeting AR and/or VDR.

Current Management and Future Perspectives of Hormone Receptor-Positive HER2-Negative Advanced Breast Cancer

OBJECTIVES

An overview of the best therapeutic approaches for the management of hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative advanced breast cancer is provided, and emerging treatment advances are discussed. Key nursing considerations and the role of the nurse in the provision of optimal care are explored.

DATA SOURCES

Data sources include peer-reviewed articles sourced in electronic databases.

CONCLUSION

With a multitude of current and emerging treatments for the management of hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer, patients with this subtype have improved overall survival. It is essential that specialist nurses holistically support patients; this will ensure treatment adherence, leading to enhanced longevity and quality of life.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

Nurses play an important role in patient education and the early identification and management of treatment toxicities. Nurses also need to monitor and facilitate adherence by identifying barriers and implementing strategies to overcome them, ultimately improving patient outcomes.

Anastrozole as a therapeutic option for gynecomastia in a person receiving antiretroviral therapy: Case report

A middle-aged Caucasian man living with HIV, clinically stable (viral load <20 copies/mL) on injectable antiretroviral cabotegravir plus rilpivirine every 2 months presented with a 6-month history of bilateral enlargement of the breasts associated with pain. His hormonal profile was normal, and no other underlying cause was identified. He was diagnosed with idiopathic gynecomastia. Tamoxifen is an anti-oestrogen recommended for gynecomastia and has been described in people living with HIV but can potentially induce the activity of cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4), reducing rilpivirine concentrations, which consequently may cause virological failure and resistance. This is the same for other antiretroviral agents majorly induced by CYP3A4. To date, there have been no reported cases of using anastrozole as a treatment for gynecomastia in people living with HIV or of its co-administration with antiretroviral. We describe the use of an aromatase inhibitor instead of tamoxifen in a person living with HIV, diagnosed with gynecomastia.

Aromatase inhibitors: the journey from the state of the art to clinical open questions

Breast cancer is a major cause of death among females. Great advances have been made in treating this disease, and aromatase inhibitors (AIs) have been recognized as the cornerstone. They are characterized by high efficacy and low toxicity. The authors reviewed the available literature and defined state-of-the-art AI management. This study was designed to assist clinicians in addressing the need to equally weigh patients' needs and disease control rates in their everyday clinical practice. Today, AIs play a central role in the treatment of hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. In this study, an expert panel reviewed the literature on the use of AIs, discussing the evolution of their use in various aspects of breast cancer, from pre- and postmenopausal early breast cancer to metastatic breast cancer, along with their management regarding efficacy and toxicity. Given the brilliant results that have been achieved in improving survival in everyday clinical practice, clinicians need to address their concerns about therapy duration and the adverse effects they exert on bone health, the cardiovascular system, and metabolism. Currently, in addition to cancer treatment, patient engagement is crucial for improving adherence to therapy and supporting patients' quality of life, especially in a selected subset of patients, such as those receiving an extended adjuvant or combination with targeted therapies. A description of modern technologies that contribute to this important goal is provided.

A review of tamoxifen administration regimen optimization for Cre/loxp system in mouse bone study

Gene knockout is a technique routinely used in basic experimental research, particularly in mouse skeletal and developmental studies. Tamoxifen-induced Cre/loxp system is known for its temporal and spatial precision and commonly utilized by researchers. However, tamoxifen has been shown its side effects on affecting the phenotype of mouse bone directly. This review aimed to optimize tamoxifen administration regimens including its dosage and duration, to identify an optimal induction strategy that minimizes potential side effects while maintaining recombination efficacy. This study will help researchers in designing gene knockout experiments in bone when using tamoxifen.

Association of Adherence to Endocrine Therapy Among Patients With Breast Cancer and Potential Drug-Drug Interactions

IMPORTANCE

Suboptimal adherence to endocrine therapy (ET) among patients with hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer significantly affects survival outcomes and is associated with higher hospitalization rates and health care costs. Weak adherence to long-term treatments has multiple determinants, including disease characteristics, treatment adverse effects, and patients' attributes, such as age and comorbidities.

OBJECTIVE

To examine whether potential drug-drug interactions (PDDI) with tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitor were associated with adherence to ET in patients with early and advanced breast cancer.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This cohort study used anonymized health record data of women with breast cancer who received ET in a private observational primary care database. Patients eligible for analysis included women aged 18 years or older who had a reported diagnosis of breast cancer and received ET with tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitor between 1994 and 2021. Data were analyzed 2021.

EXPOSURES

Adherence to ET during a given year was defined by a medication possession ratio of 80% or greater over 1-year prescription periods. PDDI were categorized into absent, minor (a combination to take into account), moderate (combination requiring precautions for use), major (combination not recommended), and contraindicated according to guidelines in the Claude Bernard Drug Database.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

We used regression models to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs for the associations between adherence and age, baseline comorbidities, PDDI, and adherence to ET during the previous year.

RESULTS

A total of 10 863 patients who were prescribed ET for breast cancer were eligible for the analysis (age 70 years or older, 3509 patients [32.3%]). In the tamoxifen cohort (3564 patients), PDDI were reported in 497 of 3670 patients (13.5%) at baseline (moderate, 254 patients [51.1%]; major, 227 patients [45.7%]), 2047 of 4831 patients (42.4%) at year 1, 1127 of 2751 patients (41.0%) at year 2, 761 of 1861 patients (40.9%) at year 3, 376 of 1058 patients (35.5%) at year 4, and 201 of 593 patients (33.9%) at year 5. In the aromatase inhibitor cohort (7299 patients), PDDI were reported in 592 of 7437 patients (8.0%) at baseline (moderate in 588 of 592 patients [99.3%]), which reached 2875 of 9031 patients (31.8%) at year 1 and ranged between 31.4% (1802 of 5730 patients in year 2) and 32.8% (791 of 2411 in year 4) throughout the study period. No association between adherence and PDDI was found in the tamoxifen (OR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.91-1.08) or aromatase inhibitor (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.95-1.15) cohort.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this cohort of patients with hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer, PDDI with tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors were not associated with adherence to ET.

Identification of estrogen receptor down-regulators for endocrine resistant breast cancer

Resistance to endocrine therapies remains an impediment for the treatment of estrogen receptor (ER) positive breast cancer. ER down regulator Fulvestrant has showed great activity to overcome the endocrine resistance. However, Fulvestrant has poor bioavailability due to the hydrophobicity. Identification of novel ER down regulator is still important. Compounds 172 and 183 are two steroidal compounds with androgen scaffold but significantly down regulated ER in multiple breast cancer cell lines. RT-PCR results indicated that both compounds did not affect ER gene expression. Proteasome inhibitor MG132 could attenuate ER down regulation effect of the compounds, suggesting that the ER down regulation was via ubiquitin-proteasomal pathway. Furthermore, compounds 172 and 183 could downregulate ER in endocrine resistant breast cancer cell model long term estrogen deprivation (LTED) MCF-7 cells. Hydrophobicity of compounds 172 and 183 were determined and showed improved solubility compared to Fulvestrant. All these results suggested that compounds 172 and 183 could be potential lead compounds for drug development for the treatment of endocrine resistance breast cancer.

Chemotherapy and Physical Therapeutics Modulate Antigens on Cancer Cells

Cancer cells possess specific properties, such as multidrug resistance or unlimited proliferation potential, due to the presence of specific proteins on their cell membranes. The release of proliferation-related proteins from the membrane can evoke a loss of adaptive ability in cancer cells and thus enhance the effects of anticancer therapy. The upregulation of cancer-specific membrane antigens results in a better outcome of immunotherapy. Moreover, cytotoxic T-cells may also become more effective when stimulated ex-vivo toward the anticancer response. Therefore, the modulation of membrane proteins may serve as an interesting attempt in anticancer therapy. The presence of membrane antigens relies on various physical factors such as temperature, exposure to radiation, or drugs. Therefore, changing the tumor microenvironment conditions may lead to cancer cells becoming sensitized to subsequent therapy. This paper focuses on the therapeutic approaches modulating membrane antigens and enzymes in anticancer therapy. It aims to analyze the possible methods for modulating the antigens, such as pharmacological treatment, electric field treatment, photodynamic reaction, treatment with magnetic field or X-ray radiation. Besides, an overview of the effects of chemotherapy and immunotherapy on the immunophenotype of cancer cells is presented. Finally, the authors review the clinical trials that involved the modulation of cell immunophenotype in anticancer therapy.

Experimental models of endocrine responsive breast cancer: strengths, limitations, and use

Breast cancers characterized by expression of estrogen receptor-alpha (ER; ESR1) represent approximately 70% of all new cases and comprise the largest molecular subtype of this disease. Despite this high prevalence, the number of adequate experimental models of ER+ breast cancer is relatively limited. Nonetheless, these models have proved very useful in advancing understanding of how cells respond to and resist endocrine therapies, and how the ER acts as a transcription factor to regulate cell fate signaling. We discuss the primary experimental models of ER+ breast cancer including 2D and 3D cultures of established cell lines, cell line- and patient-derived xenografts, and chemically induced rodent models, with a consideration of their respective general strengths and limitations. What can and cannot be learned easily from these models is also discussed, and some observations on how these models may be used more effectively are provided. Overall, despite their limitations, the panel of models currently available has enabled major advances in the field, and these models remain central to the ability to study mechanisms of therapy action and resistance and for hypothesis testing that would otherwise be intractable or unethical in human subjects.