Changing characteristics, treatment approaches and survival of patients with brain metastasis: data from six thousand and thirty-one individuals over an observation period of 30 years

Efficacy and safety of dacomitinib in treatment-naïve patients with advanced NSCLC and brain metastasis: a multicenter cohort study

BACKGROUND

The data for dacomitinib, a second-generation EGFR-TKI, treating patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and brain metastasis was lacking. This study aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of dacomitinib in treating EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC with brain metastasis in first-line settings.

METHODS

Eligible patients were treatment-naïve advanced NSCLC patients with ≥1 brain metastasis no less than 5 mm treated with dacomitinib. The primary endpoint was intracranial objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included intracranial and extracranial progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), intracranial and extracranial ORR, disease control rate (DCR), and safety. The response was evaluated per modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) and RANO-BM (Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Brain Metastases) criteria.

RESULT

Between July 2nd, 2019, and September 30th, 2022, a total of 87 treatment-naïve patients with advanced NSCLC and brain metastasis treated with dacomitinib from four hospitals were included. The data cutoff date was March 24th, 2023, and the median duration of follow-up time was 17.5 months (range 1.6-34.7 months). Based on mRECIST criteria, for all the 87 patients with evaluable brain metastasis, the iORR was 89.7% (95%CI, 81.3%-95.2%) and iDCR was 97.7% (95%CI, 91.9-99.7%), with 42 patients achieving CR, 36 patients achieving PR, and 7 patients maintaining SD. Based on RANO-BM criteria, the iORR was 71.3% (62/87, 95%CI 60.6%-80.5%) and iDCR was 97.7% (85/87, 95%CI, 91.9%-99.7%), with 42 patients achieving CR, 20 patients achieving PR, and 23 patients maintaining SD (Table). Median iPFS was 26.0 (95%CI, 20.7-31.4) months, and the 1-year and 2-year iPFS rate were 68.9% and 51.5%, respectively. Of 75 patients with evaluable extracranial lesions, 2 patients achieved CR (2.7%), the systemic ORR was 73.8% (95%CI 63.1%-82.8%) and DCR was 96.4% (89.9%-99.3%) (Table). Systemic median PFS was 14.0 (95%CI 11.1-16.9) months and median OS was 34.0 (95%CI 28.0-39.9) months. Overall, 86 of 87 (98.9%) patients experienced adverse events (AEs) of any grade. The most common (≥20%) AEs including rash (89.7%), oral ulcer (74.2%), diarrhea (67.8%), and paronychia (59.8%). Most of the AEs were grade 1 or grade 2 and no patients died due to severe AEs.

CONCLUSIONS

Dacomitinib showed promising efficacy and a manageable safety profile for advanced NSCLC with brain metastasis harboring EGFR mutation in the first-line treatment.

Identification and characterization of tertiary lymphoid structures in brain metastases

Brain metastases (BrM) are the most common cancers in the brain and linked to poor prognosis. Given the high incidence and often limited treatment options, understanding the complexity of the BrM tumor microenvironment is crucial for the development of novel therapeutic strategies. We performed transcriptome-wide gene expression profiling combined with spatial immune cell profiling to characterize the tumor immune microenvironment in 95 patients with BrM from different primary tumors. We found that BrM from lung carcinoma and malignant melanoma showed overall higher immune cell infiltration as compared to BrM from breast carcinoma. RNA sequencing-based immune cell deconvolution revealed gene expression signatures indicative of tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS) in subsets of BrM, mostly from lung cancer and melanoma. This finding was corroborated by multiplex immunofluorescence staining of immune cells in BrM tissue sections. Detection of TLS signatures was more common in treatment-naïve BrM and associated with prolonged survival after BrM diagnosis in lung cancer patients. Our findings highlight the cellular diversity of the tumor immune microenvironment in BrM of different cancer types and suggest a role of TLS formation for BrM patient outcome.

RANO criteria for response assessment of brain metastases based on amino acid PET imaging

Novel diagnostic and therapeutic opportunities are needed to improve medical care and outcome of patients with brain metastases, a frequent and severe complication of several cancer types. Currently, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the primary method used for detection, treatment planning and disease monitoring in patients with brain metastases, but this method has limitations. These limitations mean that MRI can inform on lesion size but cannot directly measure the activity or viability of tumor tissue. Positron emission tomography (PET) imaging, however, can visualize metabolically active tumor cells and is therefore increasingly incorporated into cancer care to assess tumor burden and response to treatment. Here, we define the PET Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) for brain metastasis (BM) 1.0 criteria for metabolic response assessment of brain metastases using amino acid PET. By introducing an innovative endpoint for next-generation clinical trials, the PET RANO BM 1.0 criteria aim to facilitate development of novel therapies for patients with brain metastases.

Prognostic relevance of the neurological symptom burden in brain metastases from breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Existing prognostic models for breast cancer (BC) brain metastases (BM) overlook neurological symptoms. Thus, we explored the incidence and prognostic relevance of neurological symptoms in a real-world cohort of BC patients with BM.

METHODS

The Vienna Brain Metastasis Registry identified BC patients with BM between 1992 and 2020, categorised by subtype: hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-), HER2 overexpressing (HER2+), and triple-negative (TN).

RESULTS

A total of 716 patients with BM from BC were included. In total, 80% (573/716) of the patients presented with neurological symptoms at BM diagnosis. Across all BC subtypes, asymptomatic patients presented with a significantly longer median OS from diagnosis of BM compared to symptomatic patients (p < 0.05; log-rank test; HR+ BC 29 vs. 9 months; HER2+ BC 24 vs. 12 months; TN 12 vs. 6 months). In multivariate analysis with the BC-specific Graded Prognostic Assessment (Breast-GPA: HR:1.4; 95% CI:1.3-1.5; p < 0.001), the presence of neurological symptoms at diagnosis (HR:1.6; 95% CI: 1.4-1.9; p < 0.001) presented as independently associated with OS from time of BM diagnosis, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Neurological burden at BM diagnosis independently predicts survival in BC patients. Our findings emphasise incorporating the symptom status in the prognostic evaluation and reassessing BM screening in high-risk patients during prospective clinical trials.

Single-cell atlas of endothelial and mural cells across primary and metastatic brain tumors

Central nervous system (CNS) malignancies include primary tumors, such as gliomas, and brain metastases (BrMs) originating from diverse extracranial cancers. The blood-brain barrier (BBB) is a key structural component of both primary and metastatic brain cancers. Here, we comprehensively analyzed the two major BBB cell types, endothelial and mural cells, across non-tumor brain tissue, isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutant (IDH mut) low-grade gliomas, IDH wild-type (IDH WT) high-grade glioblastomas (GBMs), and BrMs from various primary tumors. Bulk and single-cell RNA sequencing, integrated with spatial analyses, revealed that GBMs, but not low-grade gliomas, exhibit significant alterations in the tumor vasculature, including the emergence of diverse pathological vascular cell subtypes. However, these alterations are less pronounced in GBMs than in BrMs. Notably, the BrM vasculature shows higher permeability and more extensive interactions with distinct immune cell populations. This vascular atlas presents a resource toward understanding of tumor-specific vascular features in the brain, providing a foundation for developing vascular- and immune-targeting therapies.

Predicting Survival Rates in Brain Metastases Patients from Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Using Radiomic Signatures Associated with Tumor Immune Heterogeneity

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) frequently metastasizes to the brain, significantly worsened prognoses. This study aimed to develop an interpretable model for predicting survival in NSCLC patients with brain metastases (BM) integrating radiomic features and RNA sequencing data. 292 samples are collected and analyzed utilizing T1/T2 MRIs. Bidirectional stepwise logistic regression is employed to identify significant variables, facilitating the construction of a prognostic model, which is benchmarked against four machine learning algorithms. BM tissue samples are processed for RNA extraction and sequencing. The optimal model achieved an AUC of 0.96 and a C-index of 0.89 in the train set and an AUC of 0.84 with a C-index of 0.78 in the test set, indicating strong predictive performance and generalizability. Patients from Xiangya Hospital are stratified into high-risk (n = 11) and low-risk (n = 30) groups. RNA sequencing revealed an enrichment of immune-related pathways, particularly the interferon (IFN) pathway in the low-risk group. Immune cell infiltration analysis identified a significant presence of CD8+-T cells, IFNγ-6/-18 in the low-risk group, suggesting an immunologically favorable tumor microenvironment. These findings highlight the potential of combining radiomic and RNA sequencing data for improved survival predictions and personalized treatment strategies in BM patients from NSCLC.

The METACER national cohort study of brain metastases in gastrointestinal cancers prospectively establishes prognostic factors

PURPOSE

Availability data are scarce and primarily retrospective in patients with brain metastasis (BM) from gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. The objective of this cohort was to determine prognostic factors for survival outcomes in patients with BM from GI cancers.

METHODS

METACER is a national multicentric prospective cohort study which included patients with BM diagnosis during a histologically proven digestive cancer follow-up between 2010 and 2014. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoints were Progression-Free survival (PFS), prognostic factors, and BM-free survival as time from disease diagnosis to BM diagnosis.

RESULTS

METACER included 130 patients, with colorectal cancer (CRC) (N = 105) and eso-gastric (N = 25) cancer (EGC). The median OS was 6.6 months: 7.1 months (95%CI: 4.7-9.7) in CRC patients and 5.2 months, (95%CI: 1.9-7.6) in EG patients (p = 0.827). In multivariate analysis, cerebral BM location (versus cerebellar), BM surgery, performance status (0-1 versus 2), and a unique BM were significantly associated with prolonged OS. BM-free survival were 30.8 months (95%CI:25.2-36.9) in CRC patients and 7.8 months (95%CI:3.8-13.6) in EGC patients (p < 0.001). In synchronous metastatic disease, BM-free survival were 18.6 months (95%CI:13.1-25.2) in CRC patients and 3.7 months (95%CI:0.03-7.8) in EGC patients (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

BM in GI cancers are of poor prognosis. BM surgery should be considered in case of unique brain lesion. In metastatic settings, EGC patients have shorter BM-free survival than CRC patients.

Potential of ex vivo organotypic slice cultures in neuro-oncology

Over recent decades, in vitro and in vivo models have significantly advanced brain cancer research; however, each presents distinct challenges for accurately mimicking in situ conditions. In response, organotypic slice cultures have emerged as a promising model recapitulating precisely specific in vivo phenotypes through an ex vivo approach. Ex vivo organotypic brain slice models can integrate biological relevance and patient-specific variability early in drug discovery, thereby aiming for more precise treatment stratification. However, the challenges of obtaining representative fresh brain tissue, ensuring reproducibility, and maintaining essential central nervous system (CNS)-specific conditions reflecting the in situ situation over time have limited the direct application of ex vivo organotypic slice cultures in robust clinical trials. In this review, we explore the benefits and possible limitations of ex vivo organotypic brain slice cultures in neuro-oncological research. Additionally, we share insights from clinical experts in neuro-oncology on how to overcome these current limitations and improve the practical application of organotypic brain slice cultures beyond academic research.

Genomic and Immune Landscape of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Brain Metastases

PURPOSE

Metastatic spread of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to the brain is a commonly occurring and challenging clinical problem, often resulting in patient mortality. Systemic therapies including immunotherapy have modest efficacy in treating brain metastases. Moreover, the local immune environment of brain metastases remains poorly described. This study aims to understand the genomic and immune landscape of NSCLC brain metastases.

METHODS

A total of 3,060 patients with NSCLC sequenced with the Strata Select assay on the Strata Oncology Platform were analyzed. Genomic alterations, tumor mutation burden (TMB), PD-L1 expression, and immune gene expression were compared across different tissue sites and histologies and within brain metastases.

RESULTS

A significant increase in TMB was observed in the brain metastasis samples compared with nonbrain metastasis samples. Mutations in TP53, KRAS, and CDKNA2A were more prevalent within the brain metastasis cohort compared with other tissue locations. In addition, PD-L1 expression was significantly decreased within brain metastasis samples compared with other sites. The overall immune landscape within the brain metastasis samples was largely reduced compared with primary lung samples. However, an immune-enriched brain metastasis cohort was identified with higher expressions of PD-L1 and other immune-related genes.

CONCLUSION

The overall TMB is increased within brain metastases compared with primary lung and other metastasis sites and is associated with a markedly diminished overall immune landscape. The identification of an immune-enriched brain metastasis subgroup suggests potential heterogeneity within the brain metastasis patient cohort, which might have implications for the development of targeted therapies.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors +/- Chemotherapy for Patients With NSCLC and Brain Metastases: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Multiple studies have demonstrated the intracranial efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) +/- chemotherapy. The efficacy of chemoimmunotherapy compared to ICI alone in patients with metastatic NSCLC and brain metastases (BM) remains unknown.

METHODS

A systematic review and network meta-analysis were performed to evaluate ICI efficacy and the influence of additional chemotherapy on survival outcomes in treatment-naïve metastatic NSCLC with BM. Randomized phase II/III studies with at least one treatment arm with an ICI were eligible. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with and without BM were assessed.

RESULTS

Ten studies were included, totaling 6560 patients, 770 with BM. Pairwise meta-analysis revealed that patients with BM treated with ICI +/- chemotherapy had improved PFS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.49; 95% CI 0.40-0.60) and OS (HR 0.55; 95% CI 0.44-0.68) versus chemotherapy alone. Patients without BM treated with ICI +/- chemotherapy also had improved PFS and OS compared to chemotherapy alone. In the network meta-analysis of patients with BM, chemoimmunotherapy demonstrated improved PFS compared to ICI alone (HR 0.64; 95% CI 0.43-0.96; p = 0.03). No significant difference was observed in OS. In the population of patients without BM, no significant differences in PFS or OS were observed between chemoimmunotherapy versus ICI alone.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis confirms that ICIs with or without chemotherapy are superior to chemotherapy alone for the first-line management of metastatic NSCLC with and without BM. This network meta-analysis suggests combination chemoimmunotherapy offers PFS benefit over ICI monotherapy in BM patients, warranting direct comparisons in clinical trials.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO: CRD42024501345.

Targeted radionuclide therapy for patients with central nervous system metastasis: Overlooked potential?

Targeted radionuclide therapy is an emerging therapeutic concept for metastatic cancer that can be considered if a tumor can be delineated by nuclear medicine imaging and also targeted based on the expression of a particular target (thera-nostics). This mode of treatment can also compete with or supplement conventional radiotherapy, for example, if MRI does not fully capture the extent of the disease, including microscopic metastases. Targeted radionuclide therapy for patients with thyroid cancer, with certain somatostatin receptor 2-expressing tumors and with prostate-specific membrane antigen-expressing prostate cancer is approved, and numerous approaches of targeted radionuclide therapy for patients with metastatic cancer are in development (eg, using fibroblast activation protein as a target). Although brain metastases are rare in cancers with approved targeted radionuclide therapies, there is no a priori reason to assume that such treatments would not be effective against brain metastases if the targets are expressed and not shielded by the blood-brain barrier. Here, we discuss the current state of the art and opportunities of targeted radionuclide therapies for patients with brain and leptomeningeal metastases.

Central nervous system metastases in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A review of the therapeutic landscape

Up to 40% of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) develop central nervous system (CNS) metastases. Current treatments for this subgroup of patients with advanced NSCLC include local therapies (surgery, stereotactic radiosurgery, and, less frequently, whole-brain radiotherapy), targeted therapies for oncogene-addicted NSCLC (small molecules, such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and antibody-drug conjugates), and immune checkpoint inhibitors (as monotherapy or combination therapy), with multiple new drugs in development. However, confirming the intracranial activity of these treatments has proven to be challenging, given that most lung cancer clinical trials exclude patients with untreated and/or progressing CNS metastases, or do not include prespecified CNS-related endpoints. Here we review progress in the treatment of patients with CNS metastases originating from NSCLC, examining local treatment options, systemic therapies, and multimodal therapeutic strategies. We also consider challenges regarding assessment of treatment response and provide thoughts around future directions for managing CNS disease in patients with advanced NSCLC.

Changing trends in gamma knife surgery to linear accelerator brain stereotactic radiotherapy in Japan: a survey based on the nationwide claims database

PURPOSE

This study evaluated the trends in the platform for stereotactic radiotherapy to the brain (SRT), utilizing the open data of the National Database published by the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study analyzed data from FY2014 to FY2021. The practices included in the study were gamma knife surgery (GKS) and SRT with a linear accelerator (LINAC). The total number of outpatient and inpatient cases in each SRT system was evaluated annually.

RESULTS

From April 2014 to March 2022, the study included 212,016 cases (102,691 GKS and 109,325 LINAC) of the registered 1,996,540 radiotherapy cases. In the first year, 13,117 (54.1%) cases were GKS, and 11,128 (45.9%) were LINAC; after that, GKS decreased, and LINAC increased, reaching the same rate in FY2017. Compared to the first year, the final year showed 11,702 GKS (- 1415 or - 10.8%) and 17,169 LINAC (+ 6041 or + 54.3%), with an increase of 4626 total SRT cases to 28,871 (+ 19.1%). The percentage of outpatient treatment also increased from 4.6 to 11.8% for GKS and from 44.7 to 57.9% for LINAC.

CONCLUSION

The study found a gradual decrease in the selection of GKS, an increasing trend in the selection of LINAC, and an increase in the overall number of stereotactic irradiations. In particular, the proportion of outpatient treatment increased, indicating that more than half of LINAC was selected for outpatient treatment.

Prognostic Role of Ventricular Size and Its Dynamics in Patients With Leptomeningeal Metastasis From Solid Tumors

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Hydrocephalus is a common radiologic sign in patients with leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) from solid tumors which can be assessed using the Evans index (EI). Here, we explored the prognostic value of ventricular size in LM.

METHODS

We identified patients with LM from solid tumors by chart review at 3 academic hospitals to explore the prognostic associations of the EI at diagnosis, first follow-up, and progression.

RESULTS

We included 113 patients. The median age was 58.3 years (interquartile range [IQR] 46.1-65.8), 41 patients (36%) were male, and 72 patients (64%) were female. The most frequent cancers were lung cancer (n = 39), breast cancer (n = 36), and melanoma (n = 23). The median EI at baseline was 0.28 (IQR 0.26-0.31); the EI value was 0.27 or more in 67 patients (59%) and 0.30 or more in 37 patients (33%). Among patients with MRI follow-up, the EI increased by 0.01 or more in 16 of 31 patients (52%), including 8 of 30 patients (30%) without and 10 of 17 patients (59%) with LM progression at first follow-up. At LM progression, an increase of EI of 0.01 or more was noted in 18 of 34 patients (53%). The median survival was 2.9 months (IQR 1-7.2). Patients with a baseline EI below 0.27 had a longer survival than those with an EI of 0.27 or more (5.3 months, IQR 2.4-10.8, vs 1.3 months, IQR 0.6-4.1) (HR 1.70, 95% CI 1.135-2.534, p = 0.0099). The median survival was 3.7 months (IQR 1.4-8.3) with an EI below 0.30 vs 1.8 months (IQR 0.8-4.1) with an EI of 0.30 or more (HR 1.40, 95% CI 0.935-1.243, p = 0.1113). Among patients with follow-up scans available, the overall survival was 9.4 months (IQR 5.6-21.0) for patients with stable or decreased EI at first follow-up as opposed to 5.6 months (IQR 2.5-10.5) for those with an increase in the EI (HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.937-1.243; p = 0.300).

DISCUSSION

The EI at baseline is prognostic in LM. An increase of EI during follow-up may be associated with inferior LM progression-free survival. Independent validation cohorts with larger sample size and evaluation of confounding factors will help to better define the clinical utility of EI assessments in LM.

Interrogation of endothelial and mural cells in brain metastasis reveals key immune-regulatory mechanisms

Brain metastasis (BrM) is a common malignancy, predominantly originating from lung, melanoma, and breast cancers. The vasculature is a key component of the BrM tumor microenvironment with critical roles in regulating metastatic seeding and progression. However, the heterogeneity of the major BrM vascular components, namely endothelial and mural cells, is still poorly understood. We perform single-cell and bulk RNA-sequencing of sorted vascular cell types and detect multiple subtypes enriched specifically in BrM compared to non-tumor brain, including previously unrecognized immune regulatory subtypes. We integrate the human data with mouse models, creating a platform to interrogate vascular targets for the treatment of BrM. We find that the CD276 immune checkpoint molecule is significantly upregulated in the BrM vasculature, and anti-CD276 blocking antibodies prolonged survival in preclinical trials. This study provides important insights into the complex interactions between the vasculature, immune cells, and cancer cells, with translational relevance for designing therapeutic interventions.

Clinical characteristics, treatment, and outcome of patients with large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung and brain metastases - data from a tertiary care center

Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) of the lung is an aggressive malignancy, with brain metastases (BM) occurring in approximately 20% of cases. There are currently no therapy guidelines for this population as only few data on the management of LCNEC and BM have been published. For this retrospective single center study, patients with LCNEC and BM were identified from the Vienna Brain Metastasis Registry. Data on clinicopathological features, BM-specific characteristics, treatment, and outcome were extracted. In total, 52/6083 (0.09%) patients in the dataset had a diagnosis of LCNEC and radiologically verified BM. Median age at diagnosis of LCNEC and BM was 59.1 and 60.1 years, respectively. Twenty-seven (51.9%) presented with single BM, while 12 (23%) exhibited > 3 BM initially. Neurologic symptoms due to BM were present in n = 40 (76.9%), encompassing neurologic deficits (n = 24), increased intracranial pressure (n = 18), and seizures (n = 6). Initial treatment of BM was resection (n = 13), whole brain radiation therapy (n = 19), and/or stereotactic radiosurgery (n = 25). Median overall survival (mOS) from LCNEC diagnosis was 16 months, and mOS after BM diagnosis was 7 months. Patients with synchronous BM had reduced mOS from LCNEC diagnosis versus patients with metachronous BM (11 versus 27 months, p = 0.003). Median OS after BM diagnosis did not differ between LCNEC patients and a control group of small cell lung cancer patients with BM (7 versus 6 months, p = 0.17). Patients with LCNEC and BM have a poor prognosis, particularly when synchronous BM are present. Prospective trials are required to define optimal therapeutic algorithms.

Phenotypic diversity of T cells in human primary and metastatic brain tumors revealed by multiomic interrogation

The immune-specialized environment of the healthy brain is tightly regulated to prevent excessive neuroinflammation. However, after cancer development, a tissue-specific conflict between brain-preserving immune suppression and tumor-directed immune activation may ensue. To interrogate potential roles of T cells in this process, we profiled these cells from individuals with primary or metastatic brain cancers via integrated analyses on the single-cell and bulk population levels. Our analysis revealed similarities and differences in T cell biology between individuals, with the most pronounced differences observed in a subgroup of individuals with brain metastasis, characterized by accumulation of CXCL13-expressing CD39+ potentially tumor-reactive T (pTRT) cells. In this subgroup, high pTRT cell abundance was comparable to that in primary lung cancer, whereas all other brain tumors had low levels, similar to primary breast cancer. These findings indicate that T cell-mediated tumor reactivity can occur in certain brain metastases and may inform stratification for treatment with immunotherapy.

Clinical characteristics, treatment, and long-term outcome of patients with brain metastases from thyroid cancer

Brain metastases (BM) in patients with thyroid cancer (TC) are rare with an incidence of 1% for papillary and follicular, 3% for medullary and up to 10% for anaplastic TC (PTC, FTC, MTC and ATC). Little is known about the characteristics and management of BM from TC. Thus, we retrospectively analyzed patients with histologically verified TC and radiologically verified BM identified from the Vienna Brain Metastasis Registry. A total of 20/6074 patients included in the database since 1986 had BM from TC and 13/20 were female. Ten patients had FTC, 8 PTC, one MTC and one ATC. The median age at diagnosis of BM was 68 years. All but one had symptomatic BM and 13/20 patients had a singular BM. Synchronous BM at primary diagnosis were found in 6 patients, while the median time to BM diagnosis was 13 years for PTC (range 1.9-24), 4 years for FTC (range 2.1-41) and 22 years for the MTC patient. The overall survival from diagnosis of BM was 13 months for PTC (range 1.8-57), 26 months for FTC (range 3.9-188), 12 years for the MTC and 3 months for the ATC patient. In conclusion, development of BM from TC is exceedingly rare and the most common presentation is a symptomatic single lesion. While BM generally constitute a poor prognostic factor, individual patients experience long-term survival following local therapy.

Understanding the activity of antibody-drug conjugates in primary and secondary brain tumours

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), a class of targeted cancer therapeutics combining monoclonal antibodies with a cytotoxic payload via a chemical linker, have already been approved for the treatment of several cancer types, with extensive clinical development of novel constructs ongoing. Primary and secondary brain tumours are associated with high mortality and morbidity, necessitating novel treatment approaches. Pharmacotherapy of brain tumours can be limited by restricted drug delivery across the blood-brain or blood-tumour barrier, although data from phase II studies of the HER2-targeted ADC trastuzumab deruxtecan indicate clinically relevant intracranial activity in patients with brain metastases from HER2⁺ breast cancer. However, depatuxizumab mafodotin, an ADC targeting wild-type EGFR and EGFR variant III, did not provide a definitive overall survival benefit in patients with newly diagnosed or recurrent EGFR-amplified glioblastoma in phase II and III trials, despite objective radiological responses in some patients. In this Review, we summarize the available data on the central nervous system activity of ADCs from trials involving patients with primary and secondary brain tumours and discuss their clinical implications. Furthermore, we explore pharmacological determinants of intracranial activity and discuss the optimal design of clinical trials to facilitate development of ADCs for the treatment of gliomas and brain metastases.

Brain metastases from hepatopancreatobiliary malignancies

While colorectal and gastroesophageal cancer represent the two gastrointestinal (GI) tumor entities with the highest incidence of brain metastatic (BM) disease, data on the clinical course of BM patients from hepatopancreatobiliary malignancies are rare. Patients with cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP NEN). Treated for BM between 1991 and 2017 at an academic care center were included. Brain metastases-free survival (BMFS) was defined as interval from first diagnosis until BM development. Overall survival (OS) was defined as interval from diagnosis of BM until death or last date of follow-up. Outcome was correlated with clinical and treatment factors. 29 patients from overall 6102 patients (0.6%) included in the Vienna Brain Metastasis Registry presented with BM from hepatopancreatobiliary primaries including 9 (31.0%) with CCA, 10 (34.5%) with HCC, 7 (24.1%) with PDAC and 3 (10.3%) with GEP NEN as primary tumor. Median BMFS was 21, 12, 14 and 7 months and median OS 4, 4, 6 and 4 months, respectively. Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) below 80% (p = 0.08), age above 60 years (p = 0.10) and leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LC) (p = 0.09) diagnosed concomitant to solid BM showed an inverse association with median OS (Cox proportional hazards model). In this cohort of patients with BM from hepatopancreatobiliary tumor entities, prognosis was shown to be very limited. Performance status, age and diagnosis of LC were identified as negative prognostic factors.

Impact of Novel Treatments in Patients with Melanoma Brain Metastasis: Real-World Data

BACKGROUND

Melanoma brain metastasis (MBM) is associated with poor outcome, but targeted therapies (TTs) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized treatment over the past decade. We assessed the impact of these treatments in a real-world setting.

METHODS

A single-center cohort study was performed at a large, tertiary referral center for melanoma (Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands). Overall survival (OS) was assessed before and after 2015, after which TTs and ICIs were increasingly prescribed.

RESULTS

There were 430 patients with MBM included; 152 pre-2015 and 278 post-2015. Median OS improved from 4.4 to 6.9 months (HR 0.67, p < 0.001) after 2015. TTs and ICIs prior to MBM diagnosis were associated with poorer median OS as compared to no prior systemic treatment (TTs: 2.0 vs. 10.9 and ICIs: 4.2 vs. 7.9 months, p < 0.001). ICIs directly after MBM diagnosis were associated with improved median OS as compared to no direct ICIs (21.5 vs. 4.2 months, p < 0.001). Stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT; HR 0.49, p = 0.013) and ICIs (HR 0.32, p < 0.001) were independently associated with improved OS.

CONCLUSION

After 2015, OS significantly improved for patients with MBM, especially with SRT and ICIs. Demonstrating a large survival benefit, ICIs should be considered first after MBM diagnosis, if clinically feasible.

A retrospective analysis of the prognosis of Japanese patients with sarcoma brain metastasis

BACKGROUND

Bone and soft tissue sarcomas are rare tumors and extremely rarely metastasize to the brain. Previous studies have examined the characteristics and poor prognostic factors in cases of sarcoma brain metastasis (BM). Due to the rarity of cases of BM from sarcoma, limited data exist concerning the prognostic factors and treatment strategies.

METHODS

A retrospective single-center study was performed on sarcoma patients with BM. The clinicopathological characteristics and treatment options for BM of sarcoma were investigated to identify predictive prognostic factors.

RESULTS

Between 2006 and 2021, 32 patients treated for newly diagnosed BM at our hospital were retrieved among 3133 bone and soft tissue sarcoma patients via our database. The most common symptom was headache (34%), and the most common histological subtypes were alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS) and undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (25%). Non-ASPS (p = 0.022), presence of lung metastasis (p = 0.046), a short duration between initial metastasis, and the diagnosis of brain metastasis (p = 0.020), and the absence of stereotactic radiosurgery for BM (p = 0.0094) were significantly correlated with a poor prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, the prognosis of patients with brain metastases of sarcomas is still dismal, but it is necessary to be aware of the factors associated with a relatively favorable prognosis and to select treatment options appropriately.

Immunogenomic analysis of human brain metastases reveals diverse immune landscapes across genetically distinct tumors

Brain metastases (BrMs) are the most common form of brain tumors in adults and frequently originate from lung and breast primary cancers. BrMs are associated with high mortality, emphasizing the need for more effective therapies. Genetic profiling of primary tumors is increasingly used as part of the effort to guide targeted therapies against BrMs, and immune-based strategies for the treatment of metastatic cancer are gaining momentum. However, the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) of BrM is extremely heterogeneous, and whether specific genetic profiles are associated with distinct immune states remains unknown. Here, we perform an extensive characterization of the immunogenomic landscape of human BrMs by combining whole-exome/whole-genome sequencing, RNA sequencing of immune cell populations, flow cytometry, immunofluorescence staining, and tissue imaging analyses. This revealed unique TIME phenotypes in genetically distinct lung- and breast-BrMs, thereby enabling the development of personalized immunotherapies tailored by the genetic makeup of the tumors.

Validation and discussion of clinical practicability of the 2022 graded prognostic assessment for NSCLC adenocarcinoma patients with brain metastases in a routine clinical cohort

Introduction

The goal of this analysis is to validate the 2022 graded prognostic assessment (GPA) for patients with brain metastases from adenocarcinoma of the lung and to discuss its clinical practicability.

Methods/material

137 patients with adenocarcinoma of the lung were included in this analysis. The disease specific GPA for NSCLC, Lung-molGPA and the GPA for NSCLC adenocarcinoma were calculated. Overall survival was calculated for each GPA group. Additionally, expected and actual OS in the prognostic groups of the GPA available at the time of the patients' diagnosis was compared.

Results

Median overall survival (OS) from diagnosis of brain metastases was 15 months (95% confidence interval (CI) 9.7-20.3 months). The median OS in the three individual prognostic groups was 7 months for GPA 0-1, 16 months for GPA 1.5-2, 33 months for GPA 2.5-3 and not reached for GPA 3.5-4 (p<0.001). Median survival times for the individual groups were similar to those published in the original GPA publication. Regarding the expected and actual OS when using the available GPA at the time of diagnosis there was an underestimation of survival of more than 3 months for all except the worst prognosis group.

Conclusion

We were able to validate the 2022 GPA for NSCLC adenocarcinoma patients with brain metastases in a similar cohort from a non-academic center. However, the practical applicability regarding the expected median OS might be limited due to the constantly evolving treatment landscape and the consecutive improvement in overall survival.

Brain metastasis screening in the molecular age

The incidence of brain metastases (BM) amongst cancer patients has been increasing due to improvements in therapeutic options and an increase in overall survival. Molecular characterization of tumors has provided insights into the biology and oncogenic drivers of BM and molecular subtype-based screening. Though there are currently some screening and surveillance guidelines for BM, they remain limited. In this comprehensive review, we review and present epidemiological data on BM, their molecular characterization, and current screening guidelines. The molecular subtypes with the highest BM incidence are epithelial growth factor receptor-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), BRCA1, triple-negative (TN), and HER2+ breast cancers, and BRAF-mutated melanoma. Furthermore, BMs are more likely to present asymptomatically at diagnosis in oncogene-addicted NSCLC and BRAF-mutated melanoma. European screening standards recommend more frequent screening for oncogene-addicted NSCLC patients, and clinical trials are investigating screening for BM in hormone receptor+, HER2+, and TN breast cancers. However, more work is needed to determine optimal screening guidelines for other primary cancer molecular subtypes. With the advent of personalized medicine, molecular characterization of tumors has revolutionized the landscape of cancer treatment and prognostication. Incorporating molecular characterization into BM screening guidelines may allow physicians to better identify patients at high risk for BM development and improve patient outcomes.

The Analysis of Trends in Survival for Patients with Melanoma Brain Metastases with Introduction of Novel Therapeutic Options before the Era of Combined Immunotherapy-Multicenter Italian-Polish Report

Stage IV melanoma patients develop melanoma brain metastases (MBM) in 50% of cases. Their prognosis is improving, and its understanding outside the context of clinical trials is relevant. We have retrospectively analyzed the clinical data, course of treatment, and outcomes of 531 subsequent stage IV melanoma patients with BM treated in five reference Italian and Polish melanoma centers between 2014 and 2021. Patients with MBM after 2017 had a better prognosis, with a significantly improved median of overall survival (OS) after 2017 in the worst mol-GPA prognostic groups (mol-GPA ≤ 2): a median OS >6 months and HR 0.76 vs. those treated before 2017 (CI: 0.60−0.97, p = 0.027). In our prognostic model, mol-GPA was highly predictive for survival, and symptoms without steroid use did not have prognostic significance. Local therapy significantly improved survival regardless of the year of diagnosis (treated before or after 2017), with median survival >12 months. Systemic therapy improved outcomes when it was combined with local therapy. Local surgery was associated with improved OS regardless of the timing related to treatment start (i.e., before or after 30 days from MBM diagnosis). Local and systemic treatment significantly prolong survival for the poorest mol-GPA prognosis. Use of modern treatment modalities is justified in all mol-GPA prognostic groups.

Brain metastases in patients with ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND

Brain metastasis (BM) are uncommon among women with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). The frequency, risk factors and clinical repercussions of BM in these patients are not well described.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated EOC patients treated at our center from 2002 to 2020 and assessed their clinical parameters, risk for BM development and association with overall survival (OS). This cohort has a known high frequency of BRCA mutation carriers (BRCAm) due to women of Ashkenazi Jewish descent.

RESULTS

Among 1035 EOC patients, 29 (2.8%) were diagnosed with BM. The prevalence of BRCA mutations was more common among women with BM (56.5% vs. 34.3%, p = 0.033). The BM rate in patients with BRCAm was higher than the BM rate in those with wildtype BRCA (BRCAw; 5.1% vs. 2.1%, OR = 2.6; 95% CI: 1.2-5.4, p = 0.013). Median time from diagnosis to BM and from disease recurrence to BM was longer among patients with BRCAm. Median OS was not significantly different among patients with BM versus those without BM (59.4 vs. 73.4 months, p = 0.243). After BM diagnosis, median OS was not statistically significantly different between patients with BRCAm and those with BRCAw (20.6 vs. 12.3 months, p = 0.441). Treatment with poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors and bevacizumab had no impact on subsequent development of BM.

CONCLUSIONS

BM are rare among EOC patients. However, the risk is three-fold higher among patients with BRCAm. BM do not significantly alter OS among EOC patients. The higher rate of BM in patients with BRCAm may be related to longer OS in this subpopulation.