1
|
Derks SHAE, van der Meer EL, Joosse A, de Jonge MJA, Slagter C, Schouten JW, Hoop EOD, Smits M, van den Bent MJ, Jongen JLM, van der Veldt AAM. The development of brain metastases in patients with different therapeutic strategies for metastatic renal cell cancer. Int J Cancer 2024. [PMID: 38703351 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.34984] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2024] [Revised: 02/27/2024] [Accepted: 04/09/2024] [Indexed: 05/06/2024]
Abstract
A diagnosis of brain metastasis (BM) significantly affects quality of life in patients with metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC). Although systemic treatments have shown efficacy in mRCC, active surveillance (AS) is still commonly used in clinical practice. In this single-center cohort study, we assessed the impact of different initial treatment strategies for metastatic RCC (mRCC) on the development of BM. All consecutive patients diagnosed with mRCC between 2011 and 2022 were included at the Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, the Netherlands, and a subgroup of patients with BM was selected. In total, 381 patients with mRCC (ECM, BM, or both) were identified. Forty-six patients had BM of whom 39 had metachronous BM (diagnosed ≥1 month after ECM). Twenty-five (64.1%) of these 39 patients with metachronous BM had received prior systemic treatment for ECM and 14 (35.9%) patients were treatment naive at BM diagnosis. The median BM-free survival since ECM diagnosis was significantly longer (p = .02) in previously treated patients (29.0 [IQR 12.6-57.0] months) compared to treatment naive patients (6.8 [IQR 1.0-7.0] months). In conclusion, patients with mRCC who received systemic treatment for ECM prior to BM diagnosis had a longer BM-free survival as compared to treatment naïve patients. These results emphasize the need for careful evaluation of treatment strategies, and especially AS, for patients with mRCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie H A E Derks
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Edgar L van der Meer
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Arjen Joosse
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maja J A de Jonge
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Cleo Slagter
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joost W Schouten
- Department of Neurosurgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Esther Oomen-de Hoop
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marion Smits
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Martin J van den Bent
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joost L M Jongen
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Astrid A M van der Veldt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Geurts BS, Zeverijn LJ, Leek LVM, van Berge Henegouwen JM, Hoes LR, van der Wijngaart H, van der Noort V, van de Haar J, van Ommen-Nijhof A, Kok M, Roepman P, Jansen AML, de Leng WWJ, de Jonge MJA, Hoeben A, van Herpen CML, Westgeest HM, Wessels LFA, Verheul HMW, Gelderblom H, Voest EE. Efficacy of pembrolizumab and biomarker analysis in patients with WGS-based intermediate to high tumor mutational load: results from the Drug Rediscovery Protocol. Clin Cancer Res 2024:743079. [PMID: 38630551 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-24-0011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2024] [Revised: 02/25/2024] [Accepted: 04/05/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate efficacy of pembrolizumab across multiple cancer types harboring different levels of Whole-Genome Sequencing (WGS)-based tumor mutational load (TML; total of non-synonymous mutations across the genome) in patients included in the Drug Rediscovery Protocol (NCT02925234). PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with solid, treatment-refractory, microsatellite-stable tumors were enrolled in cohort A: breast cancer TML 140-290, cohort B: tumor-agnostic cohort TML 140-290, and cohort C: tumor-agnostic cohort TML >290. Patients received pembrolizumab 200 mg every three weeks. Primary endpoint was clinical benefit (CB: objective response or stable disease (SD) ≥16 weeks). Pre-treatment tumor biopsies were obtained for WGS and RNA-sequencing. RESULTS Seventy-two evaluable patients with 26 different histotypes were enrolled. CB rate was 13% in cohort A (3/24 with partial response (PR)), 21% in cohort B (3/24 with SD, 2/24 with PR), and 42% in cohort C (4/24 with SD, 6/24 with PR). In cohort C, neoantigen burden estimates and expression of inflammation and innate immune biomarkers were significantly associated with CB. Similar associations were not identified in cohort A and B. In cohort A, CB was significantly associated with mutations in the chromatin remodeling gene PBRM1, while in cohort B, CB was significantly associated with expression of MICA/MICB and butyrophilins. CB and clonal TML were not significantly associated. CONCLUSION While in cohort A pembrolizumab lacked activity, cohort B and cohort C met the study's primary endpoint. Further research is warranted to refine selection of patients with tumors harboring lower TMLs and may benefit from a focus on innate immunity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Louisa R Hoes
- Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | | | - Joris van de Haar
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, Netherlands
| | | | - Marleen Kok
- Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Paul Roepman
- Hartwig Medical Foundation, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Anne M L Jansen
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | | | | | - Ann Hoeben
- Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Emile E Voest
- Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
van Lent LGG, van der Ham M, de Jonge MJA, Gort EH, van Mil M, Hasselaar J, van der Rijt CCD, van Gurp J, van Weert JCM. Patient values in patient-provider communication about participation in early phase clinical cancer trials: a qualitative analysis before and after implementation of an online value clarification tool intervention. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2024; 24:32. [PMID: 38308286 PMCID: PMC10835819 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-024-02434-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2023] [Accepted: 01/22/2024] [Indexed: 02/04/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with advanced cancer who no longer have standard treatment options available may decide to participate in early phase clinical trials (i.e. experimental treatments with uncertain outcomes). Shared decision-making (SDM) models help to understand considerations that influence patients' decision. Discussion of patient values is essential to SDM, but such communication is often limited in this context and may require new interventions. The OnVaCT intervention, consisting of a preparatory online value clarification tool (OnVaCT) for patients and communication training for oncologists, was previously developed to support SDM. This study aimed to qualitatively explore associations between patient values that are discussed between patients and oncologists during consultations about potential participation in early phase clinical trials before and after implementation of the OnVaCT intervention. METHODS This study is part of a prospective multicentre nonrandomized controlled clinical trial and had a between-subjects design: pre-intervention patients received usual care, while post-intervention patients additionally received the OnVaCT. Oncologists participated in the communication training between study phases. Patients' initial consultation on potential early phase clinical trial participation was recorded and transcribed verbatim. Applying a directed approach, two independent coders analysed the transcripts using an initial codebook based on previous studies. Steps of continuous evaluation and revision were repeated until data saturation was reached. RESULTS Data saturation was reached after 32 patient-oncologist consultations (i.e. 17 pre-intervention and 15 post-intervention). The analysis revealed the values: hope, perseverance, quality or quantity of life, risk tolerance, trust in the healthcare system/professionals, autonomy, social adherence, altruism, corporeality, acceptance of one's fate, and humanity. Patients in the pre-intervention phase tended to express values briefly and spontaneously. Oncologists acknowledged the importance of patients' values, but generally only gave 'contrasting' examples of why some accept and others refuse to participate in trials. In the post-intervention phase, many oncologists referred to the OnVaCT and/or asked follow-up questions, while patients used longer phrases that combined multiple values, sometimes clearly indicating their weighing. CONCLUSIONS While all values were recognized in both study phases, our results have highlighted the different communication patterns around patient values in SDM for potential early phase clinical trial participation before and after implementation of the OnVaCT intervention. This study therefore provides a first (qualitative) indication that the OnVaCT intervention may support patients and oncologists in discussing their values. TRIAL REGISTRATION Netherlands Trial Registry: NL7335, registered on July 17, 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liza G G van Lent
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Mirte van der Ham
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Maja J A de Jonge
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Eelke H Gort
- Department of Medical Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Centre, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Marjolein van Mil
- Department of Medical Oncology and Clinical Pharmacology, Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jeroen Hasselaar
- Department of Pain, Anaesthesiology and Palliative Care, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Carin C D van der Rijt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jelle van Gurp
- Department of IQ Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Julia C M van Weert
- Department of Communication Science, Amsterdam School of Communication Research (ASCoR) and University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Subbiah V, Kreitman RJ, Wainberg ZA, Gazzah A, Lassen U, Stein A, Wen PY, Dietrich S, de Jonge MJA, Blay JY, Italiano A, Yonemori K, Cho DC, de Vos FYFL, Moreau P, Fernandez EE, Schellens JHM, Zielinski CC, Redhu S, Boran A, Passos VQ, Ilankumaran P, Bang YJ. Dabrafenib plus trametinib in BRAFV600E-mutated rare cancers: the phase 2 ROAR trial. Nat Med 2023; 29:1103-1112. [PMID: 37059834 PMCID: PMC10202803 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-023-02321-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 46.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2022] [Accepted: 03/27/2023] [Indexed: 04/16/2023]
Abstract
BRAFV600E alterations are prevalent across multiple tumors. Here we present final efficacy and safety results of a phase 2 basket trial of dabrafenib (BRAF kinase inhibitor) plus trametinib (MEK inhibitor) in eight cohorts of patients with BRAFV600E-mutated advanced rare cancers: anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (n = 36), biliary tract cancer (n = 43), gastrointestinal stromal tumor (n = 1), adenocarcinoma of the small intestine (n = 3), low-grade glioma (n = 13), high-grade glioma (n = 45), hairy cell leukemia (n = 55) and multiple myeloma (n = 19). The primary endpoint of investigator-assessed overall response rate in these cohorts was 56%, 53%, 0%, 67%, 54%, 33%, 89% and 50%, respectively. Secondary endpoints were median duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety. Median DoR was 14.4 months, 8.9 months, not reached, 7.7 months, not reached, 31.2 months, not reached and 11.1 months, respectively. Median PFS was 6.7 months, 9.0 months, not reached, not evaluable, 9.5 months, 5.5 months, not evaluable and 6.3 months, respectively. Median OS was 14.5 months, 13.5 months, not reached, 21.8 months, not evaluable, 17.6 months, not evaluable and 33.9 months, respectively. The most frequent (≥20% of patients) treatment-related adverse events were pyrexia (40.8%), fatigue (25.7%), chills (25.7%), nausea (23.8%) and rash (20.4%). The encouraging tumor-agnostic activity of dabrafenib plus trametinib suggests that this could be a promising treatment approach for some patients with BRAFV600E-mutated advanced rare cancers. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT02034110 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vivek Subbiah
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Robert J Kreitman
- Laboratory of Molecular Biology, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Zev A Wainberg
- Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Anas Gazzah
- Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy Cancer Institute, Villejuif, France
| | - Ulrik Lassen
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Alexander Stein
- Department of Internal Medicine II (Oncology Center), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Patrick Y Wen
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Maja J A de Jonge
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jean-Yves Blay
- Center Leon Berard & University Claude Bernard Lyon I, Lyon, France
| | - Antoine Italiano
- Early Phase Trials and Sarcoma Units, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France; Faculty of Medicine, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | | | | | - Filip Y F L de Vos
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, University Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Elena Elez Fernandez
- Department of Medical Oncology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital (HUVH), Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), IOB-Quiron, UVic-UCC, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - Suman Redhu
- Global Program Biostatistics, Novartis Oncology, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Aislyn Boran
- Global Drug Development, Oncology Development Unit, Novartis Services, Inc., East Hanover, NJ, USA
| | - Vanessa Q Passos
- Global Drug Development, Oncology Development Unit, Novartis Services, Inc., East Hanover, NJ, USA
| | - Palanichamy Ilankumaran
- Global Drug Development, Oncology Development Unit, Novartis Services, Inc., East Hanover, NJ, USA
| | - Yung-Jue Bang
- Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Geurts BS, Battaglia TW, van Berge Henegouwen JM, Zeverijn LJ, de Wit GF, Hoes LR, van der Wijngaart H, van der Noort V, Roepman P, de Leng WWJ, Jansen AML, Opdam FL, de Jonge MJA, Cirkel GA, Labots M, Hoeben A, Kerver ED, Bins AD, Erdkamp FGL, van Rooijen JM, Houtsma D, Hendriks MP, de Groot JWB, Verheul HMW, Gelderblom H, Voest EE. Efficacy, safety and biomarker analysis of durvalumab in patients with mismatch-repair deficient or microsatellite instability-high solid tumours. BMC Cancer 2023; 23:205. [PMID: 36870947 PMCID: PMC9985217 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-10663-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2022] [Accepted: 02/20/2023] [Indexed: 03/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In this study we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the PD-L1 inhibitor durvalumab across various mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) or microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) tumours in the Drug Rediscovery Protocol (DRUP). This is a clinical study in which patients are treated with drugs outside their labeled indication, based on their tumour molecular profile. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with dMMR/MSI-H solid tumours who had exhausted all standard of care options were eligible. Patients were treated with durvalumab. The primary endpoints were clinical benefit ((CB): objective response (OR) or stable disease ≥16 weeks) and safety. Patients were enrolled using a Simon like 2-stage model, with 8 patients in stage 1, up to 24 patients in stage 2 if at least 1/8 patients had CB in stage 1. At baseline, fresh frozen biopsies were obtained for biomarker analyses. RESULTS Twenty-six patients with 10 different cancer types were included. Two patients (2/26, 8%) were considered as non-evaluable for the primary endpoint. CB was observed in 13 patients (13/26, 50%) with an OR in 7 patients (7/26, 27%). The remaining 11 patients (11/26, 42%) had progressive disease. Median progression-free survival and median overall survival were 5 months (95% CI, 2-not reached) and 14 months (95% CI, 5-not reached), respectively. No unexpected toxicity was observed. We found a significantly higher structural variant (SV) burden in patients without CB. Additionally, we observed a significant enrichment of JAK1 frameshift mutations and a significantly lower IFN-γ expression in patients without CB. CONCLUSION Durvalumab was generally well-tolerated and provided durable responses in pre-treated patients with dMMR/MSI-H solid tumours. High SV burden, JAK1 frameshift mutations and low IFN-γ expression were associated with a lack of CB; this provides a rationale for larger studies to validate these findings. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinical trial registration: NCT02925234. First registration date: 05/10/2016.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Birgit S Geurts
- Division of Molecular Oncology & Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Oncode Institute, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Thomas W Battaglia
- Division of Molecular Oncology & Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Oncode Institute, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - J Maxime van Berge Henegouwen
- Oncode Institute, Utrecht, the Netherlands.,Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Laurien J Zeverijn
- Division of Molecular Oncology & Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Oncode Institute, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Gijs F de Wit
- Division of Molecular Oncology & Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Oncode Institute, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Louisa R Hoes
- Division of Molecular Oncology & Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Oncode Institute, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Hanneke van der Wijngaart
- Oncode Institute, Utrecht, the Netherlands.,Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, location VUMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Paul Roepman
- Hartwig Medical Foundation, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Wendy W J de Leng
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Cancer Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Anne M L Jansen
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Cancer Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Frans L Opdam
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Maja J A de Jonge
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Geert A Cirkel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Meander, Amersfoort, the Netherlands
| | - Mariette Labots
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, location VUMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ann Hoeben
- Department of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Emile D Kerver
- Department of Medical Oncology, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Adriaan D Bins
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, location AUMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Frans G L Erdkamp
- Department of Medical Oncology, Zuyderland Hospital, Sittard-Geelen, the Netherlands
| | - Johan M van Rooijen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Martini Hospital, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Danny Houtsma
- Department of Medical Oncology, Haga Hospital, The Hague, the Netherlands
| | - Mathijs P Hendriks
- Department of Medical Oncology, Northwest Clinics, Alkmaar, the Netherlands
| | | | - Henk M W Verheul
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Hans Gelderblom
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Emile E Voest
- Division of Molecular Oncology & Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. .,Oncode Institute, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kreitman RJ, Moreau P, Ravandi F, Hutchings M, Gazzah A, Michallet AS, Wainberg ZA, Stein A, Dietrich S, de Jonge MJA, Willenbacher W, De Grève J, Arons E, Ilankumaran P, Burgess P, Gasal E, Subbiah V. Dabrafenib plus trametinib in patients with relapsed/refractory BRAF V600E mutation-positive hairy cell leukemia. Blood 2023; 141:996-1006. [PMID: 36108341 PMCID: PMC10163281 DOI: 10.1182/blood.2021013658] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2021] [Revised: 08/22/2022] [Accepted: 08/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BRAF V600E is the key oncogenic driver mutation in hairy cell leukemia (HCL). We report the efficacy and safety of dabrafenib plus trametinib in patients with relapsed/refractory BRAF V600E mutation-positive HCL. This open-label, phase 2 study enrolled patients with BRAF V600E mutation-positive HCL refractory to first-line treatment with a purine analog or relapsed after ≥2 prior lines of treatment. Patients received dabrafenib 150 mg twice daily plus trametinib 2 mg once daily until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or death. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR) per criteria adapted from National Comprehensive Cancer Network-Consensus Resolution guidelines. Secondary endpoints included duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Fifty-five patients with BRAF V600E mutation-positive HCL were enrolled. The investigator-assessed ORR was 89.0% (95% confidence interval, 77.8%-95.9%); 65.5% of patients had a complete response (without minimal residual disease [MRD]: 9.1% [negative immunohistochemistry of bone marrow {BM} biopsy], 12.7% [negative BM aspirate flow cytometry {FC}], 16.4% [negative immunohistochemistry and/or FC results]; with MRD, 49.1%), and 23.6% had a partial response. The 24-month DOR was 97.7% with 24-month PFS and OS rates of 94.4% and 94.5%, respectively. The most common treatment-related adverse events were pyrexia (58.2%), chills (47.3%), and hyperglycemia (40.0%). Dabrafenib plus trametinib demonstrated durable responses with a manageable safety profile consistent with previous observations in other indications and should be considered as a rituximab-free therapeutic option for patients with relapsed/refractory BRAF V600E mutation-positive HCL. This trial is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02034110.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert J. Kreitman
- Laboratory of Molecular Biology, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | | | - Farhad Ravandi
- Division of Cancer Medicine, Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Martin Hutchings
- Department of Haematology and Phase 1 Unit, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Anas Gazzah
- Gustave Roussy Cancer Institute, Villejuif, France
| | | | | | - Alexander Stein
- Department of Internal Medicine II (Oncology Center), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Maja J. A. de Jonge
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wolfgang Willenbacher
- Internal Medicine V: Hematology & Oncology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
- Oncotyrol–Center for Personalized Cancer Medicine, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Jacques De Grève
- University Hospital Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Evgeny Arons
- Laboratory of Molecular Biology, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Palanichamy Ilankumaran
- Global Drug Development, Oncology Development Unit, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ
| | - Paul Burgess
- Global Drug Development, Oncology Development Unit, Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Eduard Gasal
- Global Drug Development, Oncology Development Unit, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ
| | - Vivek Subbiah
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Derks SHAE, Jongen JLM, van der Meer EL, Ho LS, Slagter C, Joosse A, de Jonge MJA, Schouten JW, Oomen-de Hoop E, van den Bent MJ, van der Veldt AAM. Impact of Novel Treatments in Patients with Melanoma Brain Metastasis: Real-World Data. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15051461. [PMID: 36900253 PMCID: PMC10000692 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15051461] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2023] [Revised: 02/20/2023] [Accepted: 02/22/2023] [Indexed: 03/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Melanoma brain metastasis (MBM) is associated with poor outcome, but targeted therapies (TTs) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized treatment over the past decade. We assessed the impact of these treatments in a real-world setting. METHODS A single-center cohort study was performed at a large, tertiary referral center for melanoma (Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands). Overall survival (OS) was assessed before and after 2015, after which TTs and ICIs were increasingly prescribed. RESULTS There were 430 patients with MBM included; 152 pre-2015 and 278 post-2015. Median OS improved from 4.4 to 6.9 months (HR 0.67, p < 0.001) after 2015. TTs and ICIs prior to MBM diagnosis were associated with poorer median OS as compared to no prior systemic treatment (TTs: 2.0 vs. 10.9 and ICIs: 4.2 vs. 7.9 months, p < 0.001). ICIs directly after MBM diagnosis were associated with improved median OS as compared to no direct ICIs (21.5 vs. 4.2 months, p < 0.001). Stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT; HR 0.49, p = 0.013) and ICIs (HR 0.32, p < 0.001) were independently associated with improved OS. CONCLUSION After 2015, OS significantly improved for patients with MBM, especially with SRT and ICIs. Demonstrating a large survival benefit, ICIs should be considered first after MBM diagnosis, if clinically feasible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie H. A. E. Derks
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joost L. M. Jongen
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Edgar L. van der Meer
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Li Shen Ho
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Cleo Slagter
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Arjen Joosse
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maja J. A. de Jonge
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joost W. Schouten
- Department of Neurosurgery, Erasmus Medical Center, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Esther Oomen-de Hoop
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Martin J. van den Bent
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Astrid A. M. van der Veldt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +31-10-704-02-52
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
van Gurp JLP, van Lent LGG, Stoel N, van der Rijt CCD, de Jonge MJA, Pulleman SM, van Weert JCM, Hasselaar J. Core values of patients with advanced cancer considering participation in an early-phase clinical trial: a qualitative study. Support Care Cancer 2022; 30:7605-7613. [PMID: 35676342 PMCID: PMC9385761 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-022-07200-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2022] [Accepted: 05/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This article identifies the core values that play a role in patients' decision-making process about participation in early-phase clinical cancer trials. METHODS Face-to-face, semi-structured serial interviews (n = 22) were performed with thirteen patients with advanced cancer recruited in two Dutch specialized cancer centers. In a cyclic qualitative analysis process, open and axial coding of the interviews finally led to an overview of the values that are woven into patients' common language about cancer and clinical trials. RESULTS Six core values were described, namely, acceptance creates room for reconsideration of values, reconciliation with one's fate, hope, autonomy, body preservation, and altruism. Previously found values in advanced cancer, such as acceptance, hope, autonomy, and altruism, were further qualified. Reconciliation with one's fate and body preservation were highlighted as new insights for early-phase clinical cancer trial literature. CONCLUSIONS This article furthers the understanding of core values that play a role in the lives and decision-making of patients with advanced cancer who explore participation in early-phase clinical cancer trials. These values do not necessarily have to be compatible with one another, making tragic choices necessary. Understanding the role of core values can contribute to professional sensitivity regarding what motivates patients' emotions, thoughts, and decisions and help patients reflect on and give words to their values and preferences. It supports mutual understanding and dialog from which patients can make decisions according to their perspectives on a good life for themselves and their fellows in the context of participation in an early-phase clinical cancer trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jelle L P van Gurp
- Department of IQ Healthcare, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, P.O. Box 9101, 6500, HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| | - Liza G G van Lent
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Nicole Stoel
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Pain & Palliative Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | | | - Maja J A de Jonge
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Saskia M Pulleman
- Department of Medical Oncology and Clinical Pharmacology, Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Julia C M van Weert
- Department of Communication Science, Amsterdam School of Communication Research (ASCoR) and University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jeroen Hasselaar
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Pain & Palliative Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
LoRusso P, Ratain MJ, Doi T, Rasco DW, de Jonge MJA, Moreno V, Carneiro BA, Devriese LA, Petrich A, Modi D, Morgan-Lappe S, Nuthalapati S, Motwani M, Dunbar M, Glasgow J, Medeiros BC, Calvo E. Eftozanermin alfa (ABBV-621) monotherapy in patients with previously treated solid tumors: findings of a phase 1, first-in-human study. Invest New Drugs 2022; 40:762-772. [PMID: 35467243 PMCID: PMC9035501 DOI: 10.1007/s10637-022-01247-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2022] [Accepted: 04/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Eftozanermin alfa (eftoza), a second-generation tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand receptor (TRAIL-R) agonist, induces apoptosis in tumor cells by activation of death receptors 4/5. This phase 1 dose-escalation/dose-optimization study evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and preliminary activity of eftoza in patients with advanced solid tumors. Patients received eftoza 2.5-15 mg/kg intravenously on day 1 or day 1/day 8 every 21 days in the dose-escalation phase, and 1.25-7.5 mg/kg once-weekly (QW) in the dose-optimization phase. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were evaluated during the first treatment cycle to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). Pharmacodynamic effects were evaluated in circulation and tumor tissue. A total of 105 patients were enrolled in the study (dose-escalation cohort, n = 57; dose-optimization cohort, n = 48 patients [n = 24, colorectal cancer (CRC); n = 24, pancreatic cancer (PaCA)]). In the dose-escalation cohort, seven patients experienced DLTs. MTD and RP2D were not determined. Most common treatment-related adverse events were increased alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase levels, nausea, and fatigue. The one treatment-related death occurred due to respiratory failure. In the dose-optimization cohort, three patients (CRC, n = 2; PaCA, n = 1) had a partial response. Target engagement with regard to receptor saturation, and downstream apoptotic pathway activation in circulation and tumor were observed. Eftoza had acceptable safety, evidence of pharmacodynamic effects, and preliminary anticancer activity. The 7.5-mg/kg QW regimen was selected for future studies on the basis of safety findings, pharmacodynamic effects, and biomarker modulations. (Trial registration number: NCT03082209 (registered: March 17, 2017)).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Toshihiko Doi
- National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | | | | | - Victor Moreno
- START Madrid-FJD, Hospital Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Benedito A Carneiro
- Lifespan Cancer Institute, Cancer Center at Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Lot A Devriese
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Emiliano Calvo
- START Madrid-CIOCC, Centro Integral Oncológico Clara Campal, Madrid, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Virtakoivu R, Rannikko JH, Viitala M, Vaura F, Takeda A, Lönnberg T, Koivunen J, Jaakkola P, Pasanen A, Shetty S, de Jonge MJA, Robbrecht D, Ma YT, Skyttä T, Minchom A, Jalkanen S, Karvonen MK, Mandelin J, Bono P, Hollmén M. Systemic Blockade of Clever-1 Elicits Lymphocyte Activation Alongside Checkpoint Molecule Downregulation in Patients with Solid Tumors: Results from a Phase I/II Clinical Trial. Clin Cancer Res 2021; 27:4205-4220. [PMID: 34078651 PMCID: PMC9401456 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-20-4862] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2020] [Revised: 03/18/2021] [Accepted: 05/24/2021] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Macrophages are critical in driving an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment that counteracts the efficacy of T-cell-targeting therapies. Thus, agents able to reprogram macrophages toward a proinflammatory state hold promise as novel immunotherapies for solid cancers. Inhibition of the macrophage scavenger receptor Clever-1 has shown benefit in inducing CD8+ T-cell-mediated antitumor responses in mouse models of cancer, which supports the clinical development of Clever-1-targeting antibodies for cancer treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS In this study, we analyzed the mode of action of a humanized IgG4 anti-Clever-1 antibody, FP-1305 (bexmarilimab), both in vitro and in patients with heavily pretreated metastatic cancer (n = 30) participating in part 1 (dose-finding) of a phase I/II open-label trial (NCT03733990). We studied the Clever-1 interactome in primary human macrophages in antibody pull-down assays and utilized mass cytometry, RNA sequencing, and cytokine profiling to evaluate FP-1305-induced systemic immune activation in patients with cancer. RESULTS Our pull-down assays and functional studies indicated that FP-1305 impaired multiprotein vacuolar ATPase-mediated endosomal acidification and improved the ability of macrophages to activate CD8+ T-cells. In patients with cancer, FP-1305 administration led to suppression of nuclear lipid signaling pathways and a proinflammatory phenotypic switch in blood monocytes. These effects were accompanied by a significant increase and activation of peripheral T-cells with indications of antitumor responses in some patients. CONCLUSIONS Our results reveal a nonredundant role played by the receptor Clever-1 in suppressing adaptive immune cells in humans. We provide evidence that targeting macrophage scavenging activity can promote an immune switch, potentially leading to intratumoral proinflammatory responses in patients with metastatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jenna H Rannikko
- MediCity Research Laboratory, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
- Turku Doctoral Program of Molecular Medicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Miro Viitala
- MediCity Research Laboratory, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
- Turku Doctoral Program of Molecular Medicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Felix Vaura
- MediCity Research Laboratory, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Akira Takeda
- MediCity Research Laboratory, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | | | | | - Panu Jaakkola
- Department of Oncology and FICAN West Cancer Centre, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Finland
| | - Annika Pasanen
- Helsinki University Hospital Comprehensive Cancer Center, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Shishir Shetty
- Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Yuk Ting Ma
- Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | | | - Anna Minchom
- Drug Development Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust/Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, United Kingdom
| | - Sirpa Jalkanen
- MediCity Research Laboratory, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | | | | | - Petri Bono
- Terveystalo Finland, Helsinki, Finland
- University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Maija Hollmén
- MediCity Research Laboratory, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
van Lent LGG, Jabbarian LJ, van Gurp J, Hasselaar J, Lolkema MP, van Weert JCM, van der Rijt CCD, de Jonge MJA. Identifying patient values impacting the decision whether to participate in early phase clinical cancer trials: A systematic review. Cancer Treat Rev 2021; 98:102217. [PMID: 33965892 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2021.102217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2021] [Revised: 04/21/2021] [Accepted: 04/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND For many patients with advanced cancer, the decision whether to participate in early phase clinical trials or not is complex. The decision-making process requires an in-depth discussion of patient values. We therefore aimed to synthesize and describe patient values that may affect early phase clinical trial participation. METHODS We conducted a systematic search in seven electronic databases on patient values in relation to patients' decisions to participate in early phase clinical cancer trials. RESULTS From 3072 retrieved articles, eleven quantitative and five qualitative studies fulfilled our inclusion criteria. We extracted ten patient values that can contribute to patients' decisions. Overall, patients who seek trial participation usually report hope, trust, quantity of life, altruism, perseverance, faith and/or risk tolerance as important values. Quality of life and humanity are main values of patients who refuse trial participation. Autonomy and social adherence can be reported by both trial seekers or refusers, dependent upon how they are manifested in a patient. CONCLUSIONS We identified patient values that frequently play a role in the decision-making process. In the setting of discussing early phase clinical trial participation with patients, healthcare professionals need to be aware of these values. This analysis supports the importance of individual exploration of values. Patients that become aware of their values, e.g. by means of interventions focused on clarifying their values, could feel more empowered to choose. Subsequently, healthcare professionals could improve their support in a patients' decision-making process and reduce the chance of decisional conflict.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liza G G van Lent
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Lea J Jabbarian
- Department of Psychiatry, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jelle van Gurp
- Department of IQ Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Jeroen Hasselaar
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Pain & Palliative Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Martijn P Lolkema
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Julia C M van Weert
- Department of Communication Science, Amsterdam School of Communication Research (ASCoR) and University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Maja J A de Jonge
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
van Bussel MTJ, Awada A, de Jonge MJA, Mau-Sørensen M, Nielsen D, Schöffski P, Verheul HMW, Sarholz B, Berghoff K, El Bawab S, Kuipers M, Damstrup L, Diaz-Padilla I, Schellens JHM. A first-in-man phase 1 study of the DNA-dependent protein kinase inhibitor peposertib (formerly M3814) in patients with advanced solid tumours. Br J Cancer 2020; 124:728-735. [PMID: 33230210 PMCID: PMC7884679 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-020-01151-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2020] [Revised: 10/07/2020] [Accepted: 10/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background This open-label, phase 1 trial (NCT02316197) aimed to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and/or recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of peposertib (formerly M3814), a DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK) inhibitor in patients with advanced solid tumours. Secondary/exploratory objectives included safety/tolerability, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profiles and clinical activity. Methods Adult patients with advanced solid tumours received peposertib 100–200 mg once daily or 150–400 mg twice daily (BID) in 21-day cycles. Results Thirty-one patients were included (median age 66 years, 61% male). One dose-limiting toxicity, consisting of mainly gastrointestinal, non-serious adverse events (AEs) and long recovery duration, was reported at 300 mg BID. The most common peposertib-related AEs were nausea, vomiting, fatigue and pyrexia. The most common peposertib-related Grade 3 AEs were maculopapular rash and nausea. Peposertib was quickly absorbed systemically (median Tmax 1.1–2.5 h). The p-DNA-PK/t-DNA-PK ratio decreased consistently in peripheral blood mononuclear cells 3–6 h after doses ≥100 mg. The best overall response was stable disease (12 patients), lasting for ≥12 weeks in seven patients. Conclusions Peposertib was well-tolerated and demonstrated modest efficacy in unselected tumours. The MTD was not reached; the RP2D was declared as 400 mg BID. Further studies, mainly with peposertib/chemo-radiation, are ongoing. Clinical trial registration NCT02316197
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark T J van Bussel
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Ahmad Awada
- Oncology Medicine Department, Jules Bordet Institute, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Maja J A de Jonge
- Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Dorte Nielsen
- Department of Oncology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Patrick Schöffski
- Department of General Medical Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Henk M W Verheul
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | - Lars Damstrup
- Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.,Debiopharm International S.A., Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Ivan Diaz-Padilla
- Ares Trading S.A., Eysins, Switzerland; an Affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Jan H M Schellens
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Synthon Biopharmaceuticals, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Posadas EM, Chi KN, de Wit R, de Jonge MJA, Attard G, Friedlander TW, Yu MK, Hellemans P, Chien C, Abrams C, Jiao JJ, Saad F. Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Antitumor Effect of Apalutamide with Abiraterone Acetate plus Prednisone in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Phase Ib Study. Clin Cancer Res 2020; 26:3517-3524. [PMID: 32366670 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-19-3402] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2019] [Revised: 03/20/2020] [Accepted: 04/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Apalutamide is a next-generation androgen receptor (AR) inhibitor approved for patients with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) and metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer. We evaluated the pharmacokinetics, safety, and antitumor activity of apalutamide combined with abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (AA-P) in patients with metastatic CRPC (mCRPC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Multicenter, open-label, phase Ib drug-drug interaction study conducted in 57 patients with mCRPC treated with 1,000 mg abiraterone acetate plus 10 mg prednisone daily beginning on cycle 1 day 1 (C1D1) and 240 mg apalutamide daily starting on C1D8 in 28-day cycles. Serial blood samples for pharmacokinetic analysis were collected on C1D7 and C2D8. RESULTS Systemic exposure to abiraterone, prednisone, and prednisolone decreased 14%, 61%, and 42%, respectively, when apalutamide was coadministered with AA-P. No increase in mineralocorticoid excess-related adverse events was observed. Patients without prior exposure to AR signaling inhibitors had longer median treatment duration and greater mean decrease in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) from baseline compared with those who had received prior therapy. Confirmed PSA reductions of ≥50% from baseline at any time were observed in 80% (12/15) of AR signaling inhibitor-naïve patients and 14% (6/42) of AR signaling inhibitor-treated patients. CONCLUSIONS Treatment with apalutamide plus AA-P was well tolerated and showed evidence of antitumor activity in patients with mCRPC, including those with disease progression on AR signaling inhibitors. No clinically significant pharmacokinetic interaction was observed between abiraterone and apalutamide; however, apalutamide decreased exposure to prednisone. These data support development of 1,000 mg abiraterone acetate plus 10 mg prednisone daily with 240 mg apalutamide daily in patients with mCRPC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edwin M Posadas
- Urologic Oncology Program & Uro-Oncology Research Laboratories, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Kim N Chi
- Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer - Vancouver Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Ronald de Wit
- Internal Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Maja J A de Jonge
- Internal Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Gerhardt Attard
- Department of Oncology, University College London Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom
| | - Terence W Friedlander
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco Medical Center, San Francisco, California
| | - Margaret K Yu
- Oncology, Janssen Research & Development, Los Angeles, California
| | | | - Caly Chien
- Clinical Pharmacology & Pharmacometrics, Janssen Research & Development, Spring House, Pennsylvania
| | - Charlene Abrams
- Global Trial Management, Janssen Research & Development, Spring House, Pennsylvania
| | - Juhui J Jiao
- Biostatistics, Janssen Research & Development, Raritan, New Jersey
| | - Fred Saad
- Department of Surgery, University of Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
de Jonge MJA, Steeghs N, Lolkema MP, Hotte SJ, Hirte HW, van der Biessen DAJ, Abdul Razak AR, De Vos FYFL, Verheijen RB, Schnell D, Pronk LC, Jansen M, Siu LL. Phase I Study of BI 853520, an Inhibitor of Focal Adhesion Kinase, in Patients with Advanced or Metastatic Nonhematologic Malignancies. Target Oncol 2020; 14:43-55. [PMID: 30756308 PMCID: PMC6407740 DOI: 10.1007/s11523-018-00617-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Overexpression/activation of focal adhesion kinase (FAK) in human malignancies has led to its evaluation as a therapeutic target. We report the first-in-human phase I study of BI 853520, a novel, potent, highly selective FAK inhibitor. OBJECTIVE Our objectives were to identify the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and to evaluate safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), biomarker expression, and preliminary activity. PATIENTS AND METHODS The study comprised a standard 3 + 3 dose-escalation phase followed by an expansion phase in patients with selected advanced, nonhematologic malignancies. RESULTS Thirty-three patients received BI 853520 in the dose-escalation phase; the MTD was 200 mg once daily (QD). Dose-limiting toxicities included proteinuria and fatigue, both of which were grade 3. Preliminary PK data supported QD dosing. In the expansion cohort, 63 patients received BI 853520 200 mg QD. Drug-related adverse events (AEs) in > 10% of patients included proteinuria (57%), nausea (57%), fatigue (51%), diarrhea (48%), vomiting (40%), decreased appetite (19%), and peripheral edema (16%). Most AEs were grade 1-2; grade 3 proteinuria, reported in 13 patients (21%), was generally reversible upon treatment interruption. Nineteen patients underwent dose reduction due to AEs, and three drug-related serious AEs were reported, none of which were fatal. Preliminary PD analysis indicated target engagement. Of 63 patients, 49 were evaluable; 17 (27%) achieved a best response of stable disease (4 with 150 + days), and 32 (51%) patients had progressive disease. CONCLUSIONS BI 853520 has a manageable and acceptable safety profile, favorable PK, and modest antitumor activity at an MTD of 200 mg QD in patients with selected advanced nonhematologic malignancies. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV IDENTIFIER NCT01335269.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maja J A de Jonge
- Department of Internal Oncology, Erasmus Medical Centre Cancer Institute, Dr. Molenwaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Neeltje Steeghs
- Department of Medical Oncology and Clinical Pharmacology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 12, 11066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Martijn P Lolkema
- Department of Internal Oncology, Erasmus Medical Centre Cancer Institute, Dr. Molenwaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht Cancer Center, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Sebastien J Hotte
- Division of Medical Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre, 3rd Floor, 699 Concession Street, Hamilton, ON, L8V 5C2, Canada
| | - Hal W Hirte
- Division of Medical Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre, 3rd Floor, 699 Concession Street, Hamilton, ON, L8V 5C2, Canada
| | - Diane A J van der Biessen
- Department of Internal Oncology, Erasmus Medical Centre Cancer Institute, Dr. Molenwaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Albiruni R Abdul Razak
- Division of Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, 610 University Avenue, Suite 5-718, Toronto, ON, M5G 2M9, Canada
| | - Filip Y F L De Vos
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht Cancer Center, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Remy B Verheijen
- Department of Medical Oncology and Clinical Pharmacology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 12, 11066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - David Schnell
- Department of Translational Medicine and Clinical Pharmacology, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Birkendorfer Str 65, 88397, Biberach, Germany
| | - Linda C Pronk
- Clinical Development Oncology, Boehringer Ingelheim España S.A., Parque Empresarial Alvento, Via de los Poblados, 1 Planta Baja-Edif. B Ofic. A y C, 28033, Madrid, Spain
| | - Monique Jansen
- Medical Department, Boehringer Ingelheim BV, Comeniusstraat 6, 1817 MS Alkmaar, PO Box 8037, 1802 KA, Aklmaar, The Netherlands
| | - Lillian L Siu
- Division of Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, 610 University Avenue, Suite 5-718, Toronto, ON, M5G 2M9, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Verheijen RB, van der Biessen DAJ, Hotte SJ, Siu LL, Spreafico A, de Jonge MJA, Pronk LC, De Vos FYFL, Schnell D, Hirte HW, Steeghs N, Lolkema MP. Randomized, Open-Label, Crossover Studies Evaluating the Effect of Food and Liquid Formulation on the Pharmacokinetics of the Novel Focal Adhesion Kinase (FAK) Inhibitor BI 853520. Target Oncol 2020; 14:67-74. [PMID: 30742245 PMCID: PMC6407750 DOI: 10.1007/s11523-018-00618-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Background BI 853520 is a potent inhibitor of focal adhesion kinase and is currently under clinical development for the treatment of non-hematological malignancies. Objective The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of food and liquid dispersion on the pharmacokinetics of BI 853520 in two open-label, crossover substudies. Patients and Methods Sixteen patients with advanced solid tumors were enrolled in each substudy. The order of administration was randomized, and pharmacokinetic samples were collected for 48 h after administration of a 200 mg dose of BI 853520. Lack of effect would be demonstrated if the 90% confidence interval (CI) of the ratio of the adjusted geometric mean (GMR) of the area under the plasma curve (area under the plasma concentration–time curve from time zero to the last quantifiable concentration at tz [\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{wasysym}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{amsbsy}
\usepackage{mathrsfs}
\usepackage{upgreek}
\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}
\begin{document}$${\text{AUC}}_{{0{-}t_{\text{z}} }}$$\end{document}AUC0-tz] and observed area under the plasma concentration–time curve extrapolated from time zero to infinity [AUC0–∞,obs]) and maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) did not cross the 80–125% (bioequivalence) boundaries. Results Adjusted GMRs (90% CIs) for the fed versus fasted state were 92.46% (74.24–115.16), 98.17% (78.53–122.74), and 87.34% (71.04–107.38) for \documentclass[12pt]{minimal}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{wasysym}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{amsbsy}
\usepackage{mathrsfs}
\usepackage{upgreek}
\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}
\begin{document}$${\text{AUC}}_{{0{-}t_{\text{z}} }}$$\end{document}AUC0-tz, AUC0–∞,obs, and Cmax, respectively. Although the 90% CIs were not within bioequivalence limits for the food-effect study, the limited reductions in these pharmacokinetic parameters after administration with a high-fat meal are unlikely to be clinically relevant. Compared with a tablet, administration of BI 853520 as a liquid dispersion did not strongly affect \documentclass[12pt]{minimal}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{wasysym}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{amsbsy}
\usepackage{mathrsfs}
\usepackage{upgreek}
\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}
\begin{document}$${\text{AUC}}_{{0{-}t_{\text{z}} }}$$\end{document}AUC0-tz, AUC0–∞,obs, or Cmax, resulting in adjusted GMRs (90% CIs) of 1.00 (0.92–1.09), 0.98 (0.90–1.07), and 0.93 (0.86–1.01), respectively. Conclusions These studies demonstrate that BI 853520 can be given with no food restrictions, and as a liquid dispersion, without strongly impacting pharmacokinetics. These pharmacokinetic properties may help make BI 853520 dosing more convenient and flexible, improving treatment compliance. Clinical trials registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01335269. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s11523-018-00618-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Remy B Verheijen
- Department of Medical Oncology and Clinical Pharmacology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Diane A J van der Biessen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Groene Hilledijk 301, 3075 EA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sebastien J Hotte
- Division of Medical Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre, 699 Concession Street, Hamilton, ON, L8V 5C2, Canada
| | - Lillian L Siu
- Division of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, 700 University Avenue, 7th Floor, Toronto, ON, M5G 1Z5, Canada
| | - Anna Spreafico
- Division of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, 700 University Avenue, 7th Floor, Toronto, ON, M5G 1Z5, Canada
| | - Maja J A de Jonge
- Department of Internal Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Groene Hilledijk 301, 3075 EA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Linda C Pronk
- Clinical Development Oncology, Boehringer Ingelheim España S.A., Parque Empresarial Alvento, Via de los Poblados, 1 planta baja-Edif. B ofic. A y C, 28033, Madrid, Spain
| | - Filip Y F L De Vos
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht Cancer Center, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - David Schnell
- Department of Translational Medicine and Clinical Pharmacology, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH and Co. KG, Birkendorfer Str. 65, 88397, Biberach, Germany
| | - Hal W Hirte
- Division of Medical Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre, 699 Concession Street, Hamilton, ON, L8V 5C2, Canada
| | - Neeltje Steeghs
- Department of Medical Oncology and Clinical Pharmacology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Martijn P Lolkema
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Groene Hilledijk 301, 3075 EA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. .,Department of Internal Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Groene Hilledijk 301, 3075 EA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
van Lent LGG, Stoel NK, van Weert JCM, van Gurp J, de Jonge MJA, Lolkema MP, Gort EH, Pulleman SM, Oomen-de Hoop E, Hasselaar J, van der Rijt CCD. Realizing better doctor-patient dialogue about choices in palliative care and early phase clinical trial participation: towards an online value clarification tool (OnVaCT). BMC Palliat Care 2019; 18:106. [PMID: 31783851 PMCID: PMC6884817 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-019-0486-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2019] [Accepted: 11/01/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with advanced cancer for whom standard systemic treatment is no longer available may be offered participation in early phase clinical trials. In the decision making process, both medical-technical information and patient values and preferences are important. Since patients report decisional conflict after deciding on participation in these trials, improving the decision making process is essential. We aim to develop and evaluate an Online Value Clarification Tool (OnVaCT) to assist patients in clarifying their values around this end-of-life decision. This improved sharing of values is hypothesized to support medical oncologists in tailoring their information to individual patients' needs and, consequently, to support patients in taking decisions in line with their values and reduce decisional conflict. METHODS In the first part, patients' values and preferences and medical oncologists' views hereupon will be explored in interviews and focus groups to build a first prototype OnVaCT using digital communication (serious gaming). Next, we will test feasibility during think aloud sessions, to deliver a ready-to-implement OnVaCT. In the second part, the OnVaCT, with accompanied training module, will be evaluated in a pre-test (12-18 months before implementation) post-test (12-18 months after implementation) study in three major Dutch cancer centres. We will include 276 patients (> 18 years) with advanced cancer for whom standard systemic therapy is no longer available, and who are referred for participation in early phase clinical trials. The first consultation will be recorded to analyse patient-physician communication regarding the discussion of patients' values and the decision making process. Three weeks afterwards, decisional conflict will be measured. DISCUSSION This project aims to support the discussion of patient values when considering participation in early phase clinical trials. By including patients before their first appointment with the medical oncologist and recording that consultation, we are able to link decisional conflict to the decision making process, e.g. the communication during consultation. The study faces challenges such as timely including patients within the short period between referral and first consultation. Furthermore, with new treatments being developed rapidly, molecular stratification may affect the patient populations included in the pre-test and post-test periods. TRIAL REGISTRATION Netherlands Trial Registry number: NTR7551 (prospective; July 17, 2018).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liza G G van Lent
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Nicole K Stoel
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Pain & Palliative Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Julia C M van Weert
- Department of Communication Science, Amsterdam School of Communication Research (ASCoR) and University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jelle van Gurp
- Department of IQ Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Maja J A de Jonge
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Martijn P Lolkema
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Eelke H Gort
- Department of Medical Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Centre, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Saskia M Pulleman
- Department of Medical Oncology and Clinical Pharmacology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Esther Oomen-de Hoop
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jeroen Hasselaar
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Pain & Palliative Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
van der Noll R, Jager A, Ang JE, Marchetti S, Mergui-Roelvink MWJ, Lolkema MP, de Jonge MJA, van der Biessen DA, Brunetto AT, Arkenau HT, Tchakov I, Beijnen JH, de Bono JS, Schellens JHM. Phase I study of continuous olaparib capsule dosing in combination with carboplatin and/or paclitaxel (Part 1). Invest New Drugs 2019; 38:1117-1128. [PMID: 31667659 DOI: 10.1007/s10637-019-00856-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2018] [Accepted: 09/12/2019] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Background The PARP inhibitor olaparib has shown acceptable toxicity at doses of up to 400 mg twice daily (bid; capsule formulation) with encouraging signs of antitumor activity. Based on its mode of action, olaparib may sensitize tumor cells to DNA-damaging agents. This Phase I trial (NCT00516724) evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) and preliminary efficacy of olaparib combined with carboplatin and/or paclitaxel. Methods Patients with advanced solid tumors received olaparib (capsule bid) plus carboplatin (Part A), carboplatin and paclitaxel (Part B), or paclitaxel (Part C). In each part of the study, different drug doses were given to define the most appropriate dose/drug combination to use in further studies. Safety assessments included evaluation of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs; cycle 1 only), adverse events (AEs) and physical examinations. PK assessments of olaparib, carboplatin and paclitaxel were performed. Tumor responses (RECIST) were assessed every two cycles. Results Fifty-seven patients received treatment. DLTs were reported in two patients (both receiving olaparib 100 mg bid and carboplatin AUC 4; Part A, cohort 2): grade 1 thrombocytopenia with grade 2 neutropenia lasting for 16 days, and grade 2 neutropenia lasting for 7 days. Non-hematologic AEs were predominantly grade 1-2 and included fatigue (70%) and nausea (40%). Bone marrow suppression, mainly neutropenia (51%) and thrombocytopenia (25%), frequently led to dose modifications. Conclusions Olaparib in combination with carboplatin and/or paclitaxel resulted in increased hematologic toxicities, making it challenging to establish a dosing regimen that could be tolerated for multiple cycles without dose modifications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruud van der Noll
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066, CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Agnes Jager
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus University MC Cancer Institute, PO Box 5201, 3008, AE, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joo Ern Ang
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and The Institute of Cancer Research, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey, SM2 5PT, UK
| | - Serena Marchetti
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066, CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marja W J Mergui-Roelvink
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066, CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Martijn P Lolkema
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus University MC Cancer Institute, PO Box 5201, 3008, AE, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and The Institute of Cancer Research, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey, SM2 5PT, UK
| | - Maja J A de Jonge
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus University MC Cancer Institute, PO Box 5201, 3008, AE, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Diane A van der Biessen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus University MC Cancer Institute, PO Box 5201, 3008, AE, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Andre T Brunetto
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and The Institute of Cancer Research, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey, SM2 5PT, UK
| | - Hendrik-Tobias Arkenau
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and The Institute of Cancer Research, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey, SM2 5PT, UK
| | - Ilian Tchakov
- AstraZeneca, Alderley Park, Park Estate, Macclesfield, SK10 4TF, UK
- Eisai, Mosquito Way, Hatfield, AL10 9SN, UK
| | - Jos H Beijnen
- Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066, CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Utrecht Institute of Pharmaceutical Science s (UIPS), Utrecht University, Domplein 29, 3512, JE, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Johann S de Bono
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and The Institute of Cancer Research, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey, SM2 5PT, UK
| | - Jan H M Schellens
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066, CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Utrecht Institute of Pharmaceutical Science s (UIPS), Utrecht University, Domplein 29, 3512, JE, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
van der Noll R, Jager A, Ang JE, Marchetti S, Mergui-Roelvink MWJ, de Bono JS, Lolkema MP, de Jonge MJA, van der Biessen DA, Brunetto AT, Arkenau HT, Tchakov I, Beijnen JH, De Grève J, Schellens JHM. Phase I study of intermittent olaparib capsule or tablet dosing in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel (part 2). Invest New Drugs 2019; 38:1096-1107. [PMID: 31637669 DOI: 10.1007/s10637-019-00857-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2018] [Accepted: 09/12/2019] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Background In the first part of this extensive phase I study (NCT00516724), continuous olaparib twice daily (bid) with carboplatin and/or paclitaxel resulted in myelosuppression and dose modifications. Here, we report the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of intermittent olaparib dosing combined with carboplatin and paclitaxel. Methods Patients with advanced solid tumors (part D) and enriched for ovarian and breast cancer (part E) received olaparib (capsule and tablet formulations) using intermittent schedules (2 to 10 days of a 21-day cycle) combined with carboplatin/paclitaxel. Safety assessments included evaluation of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs; cycle 1 only), adverse events (AEs), and physical examinations. Pharmacokinetic assessments of olaparib capsule and tablet combined with carboplatin/paclitaxel were performed. Tumor responses (RECIST) were assessed every 2 cycles. Results In total, 132 heavily pre-treated patients were included. One DLT of grade 3 elevated alanine aminotransferase lasting for 8 days was reported (olaparib tablet 100 mg bid days 3-12, carboplatin area under the curve 4 and paclitaxel 175 mg/m2). The most common hematological AEs were neutropenia (47%) and thrombocytopenia (39%), which frequently led to dose modifications. Non-hematological AEs were predominantly grade 1-2, including alopecia (89%) and fatigue (84%). Overall objective response rate was 46%. Conclusions Discontinuous dosing of olaparib resulted in significant myelosuppression leading to dose interruptions and/or delays. Anti-tumor activity was encouraging in patients enriched with BRCA-mutated breast and ovarian cancer. The most appropriate olaparib tablet dose for use in further studies evaluating olaparib in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel is 50 mg bid (days 1-5).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruud van der Noll
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Agnes Jager
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus University MC Cancer Institute, PO Box 5201, 3008 AE, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joo Ern Ang
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and The Institute of Cancer Research, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey, SM2 5PT, UK
| | - Serena Marchetti
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marja W J Mergui-Roelvink
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Johann S de Bono
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and The Institute of Cancer Research, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey, SM2 5PT, UK
| | - Martijn P Lolkema
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus University MC Cancer Institute, PO Box 5201, 3008 AE, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and The Institute of Cancer Research, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey, SM2 5PT, UK
| | - Maja J A de Jonge
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus University MC Cancer Institute, PO Box 5201, 3008 AE, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Diane A van der Biessen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus University MC Cancer Institute, PO Box 5201, 3008 AE, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Andre T Brunetto
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and The Institute of Cancer Research, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey, SM2 5PT, UK
| | - Hendrik-Tobias Arkenau
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and The Institute of Cancer Research, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey, SM2 5PT, UK
| | - Ilian Tchakov
- AstraZeneca, Alderley Park, Park Estate, Macclesfield, SK10 4TF, UK.,Eisai, Mosquito Way, Hatfield, AL10 9SN, UK
| | - Jos H Beijnen
- Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Utrecht Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS), Utrecht University, Domplein 29, 3512 JE, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jacques De Grève
- Department of Medical Oncology, Oncologisch Centrum UZ Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090, Jette, Belgium
| | - Jan H M Schellens
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Utrecht Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS), Utrecht University, Domplein 29, 3512 JE, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
van der Biessen DAJ, Gietema JA, de Jonge MJA, Desar IME, den Hollander MW, Dudley M, Dunbar M, Hetman R, Serpenti C, Xiong H, Mittapalli RK, Timms KM, Ansell P, Ratajczak CK, Shepherd SP, van Herpen CML. A phase 1 study of PARP-inhibitor ABT-767 in advanced solid tumors with BRCA1/2 mutations and high-grade serous ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer. Invest New Drugs 2018; 36:828-835. [PMID: 29313279 PMCID: PMC6153550 DOI: 10.1007/s10637-017-0551-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2017] [Accepted: 12/12/2017] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
Purpose This phase 1 study examined safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and efficacy of the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor ABT-767 in patients with advanced solid tumors and BRCA1/2 mutations or with high-grade serous ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer. Methods Patients received ABT-767 monotherapy orally until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Dose was escalated from 20 mg once daily to 500 mg twice daily (BID). Dose-limiting toxicities, recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), food effect, objective response rate, and biomarkers predicting response were determined. Results Ninety-three patients were treated with ABT-767; 80 had a primary diagnosis of ovarian cancer. ABT-767 demonstrated dose-proportional PK up to 500 mg BID and half-life of ~2 h. Food had no effect on ABT-767 bioavailability. Most common grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events were nausea, fatigue, decreased appetite, and anemia. Anemia showed dose-dependent increase. RP2D was 400 mg BID. Objective response rate by RECIST 1.1 was 21% (17/80) in all evaluable patients and 20% (14/71) in evaluable patients with ovarian cancer. Response rate by RECIST 1.1 and/or CA-125 was 30% (24/80) in patients with ovarian cancer. Mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2, homologous recombination deficiency (HRD), and platinum sensitivity were associated with tumor response. Median progression-free survival was longer for HRD positive (6.7 months) versus HRD negative patients (1.8 months) with ovarian cancer. Conclusions ABT-767 had an acceptable safety profile up to the established RP2D of 400 mg BID and dose-proportional PK. Patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation, HRD positivity, and platinum sensitivity were more sensitive to ABT-767.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jourik A Gietema
- University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Maja J A de Jonge
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Martha W den Hollander
- University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Azaro A, Rodón J, Machiels JP, Rottey S, Damian S, Baird R, Garcia-Corbacho J, Mathijssen RHJ, Clot PF, Wack C, Shen L, de Jonge MJA. A phase I pharmacokinetic and safety study of cabazitaxel in adult cancer patients with normal and impaired renal function. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2016; 78:1185-1197. [PMID: 27796539 PMCID: PMC5114328 DOI: 10.1007/s00280-016-3175-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2016] [Accepted: 10/12/2016] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Limited data are available on cabazitaxel pharmacokinetics in patients with renal impairment. This open-label, multicenter study assessed cabazitaxel in patients with advanced solid tumors and normal or impaired renal function. METHODS Cohorts A (normal renal function: creatinine clearance [CrCL] >80 mL/min/1.73 m2), B (moderate renal impairment: CrCL 30 to <50 mL/min/1.73 m2) and C (severe impairment: CrCL <30 mL/min/1.73 m2) received cabazitaxel 25 mg/m2 (A, B) or 20 mg/m2 (C, could be escalated to 25 mg/m2), once every 3 weeks. Pharmacokinetic parameters and cabazitaxel unbound fraction (F U) were assessed using linear regression and mixed models. Geometric mean (GM) and GM ratios (GMRs) were determined using mean CrCL intervals (moderate and severe renal impairment: 40 and 15 mL/min/1.73 m2) versus a control (90 mL/min/1.73 m2). RESULTS Overall, 25 patients received cabazitaxel (median cycles: 3 [range 1-20]; Cohort A: 5 [2-13]; Cohort B: 3 [1-15]; and Cohort C: 5 [1-20]), of which 24 were eligible for pharmacokinetic analysis (eight in each cohort). For moderate and severe renal impairment versus normal renal function, GMR estimates were: clearance normalized to body surface area (CL/BSA) 0.95 (90% CI 0.80-1.13) and 0.89 (0.61-1.32); area under the curve normalized to dose (AUC/dose) 1.06 (0.88-1.27) and 1.14 (0.76-1.71); and F U 0.99 (0.94-1.04) and 0.97 (0.87-1.09), respectively. Estimated slopes of linear regression of log parameters versus log CrCL (renal impairment) were: CL/BSA 0.06 (-0.15 to 0.28); AUC/dose -0.07 (-0.30 to 0.16); and F U 0.02 (-0.05 to 0.08). Cabazitaxel safety profile was consistent with previous reports. CONCLUSIONS Renal impairment had no clinically meaningful effect on cabazitaxel pharmacokinetics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Analía Azaro
- Molecular Therapeutics Research Unit, Department of Medical Oncology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain. .,Pharmacology Department, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Jordi Rodón
- Molecular Therapeutics Research Unit, Department of Medical Oncology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jean-Pascal Machiels
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Roi Albert II, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc and Institut de Recherche Clinique et Expérimentale (Pole MIRO), Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Sylvie Rottey
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Ghent and Heymans Institute of Pharmacology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Silvia Damian
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS National Cancer Institute of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Richard Baird
- Early Phase Clinical Trials Team, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Javier Garcia-Corbacho
- Early Phase Clinical Trials Team, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Ron H J Mathijssen
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Maja J A de Jonge
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Bins S, Cirkel GA, Gadellaa-Van Hooijdonk CG, Weeber F, Numan IJ, Bruggink AH, van Diest PJ, Willems SM, Veldhuis WB, van den Heuvel MM, de Knegt RJ, Koudijs MJ, van Werkhoven E, Mathijssen RHJ, Cuppen E, Sleijfer S, Schellens JHM, Voest EE, Langenberg MHG, de Jonge MJA, Steeghs N, Lolkema MP. Implementation of a Multicenter Biobanking Collaboration for Next-Generation Sequencing-Based Biomarker Discovery Based on Fresh Frozen Pretreatment Tumor Tissue Biopsies. Oncologist 2016; 22:33-40. [PMID: 27662884 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2016] [Accepted: 08/04/2016] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The discovery of novel biomarkers that predict treatment response in advanced cancer patients requires acquisition of high-quality tumor samples. As cancer evolves over time, tissue is ideally obtained before the start of each treatment. Preferably, samples are freshly frozen to allow analysis by next-generation DNA/RNA sequencing (NGS) but also for making other emerging systematic techniques such as proteomics and metabolomics possible. Here, we describe the first 469 image-guided biopsies collected in a large collaboration in The Netherlands (Center for Personalized Cancer Treatment) and show the utility of these specimens for NGS analysis. PATIENTS AND METHODS Image-guided tumor biopsies were performed in advanced cancer patients. Samples were fresh frozen, vital tumor cellularity was estimated, and DNA was isolated after macrodissection of tumor-rich areas. Safety of the image-guided biopsy procedures was assessed by reporting of serious adverse events within 14 days after the biopsy procedure. RESULTS Biopsy procedures were generally well tolerated. Major complications occurred in 2.1%, most frequently consisting of pain. In 7.3% of the percutaneous lung biopsies, pneumothorax requiring drainage occurred. The majority of samples (81%) contained a vital tumor percentage of at least 30%, from which at least 500 ng DNA could be isolated in 91%. Given our preset criteria, 74% of samples were of sufficient quality for biomarker discovery. The NGS results in this cohort were in line with those in other groups. CONCLUSION Image-guided biopsy procedures for biomarker discovery to enable personalized cancer treatment are safe and feasible and yield a highly valuable biobank. The Oncologist 2017;22:33-40Implications for Practice: This study shows that it is safe to perform image-guided biopsy procedures to obtain fresh frozen tumor samples and that it is feasible to use these biopsies for biomarker discovery purposes in a Dutch multicenter collaboration. From the majority of the samples, sufficient DNA could be yielded to perform next-generation sequencing. These results indicate that the way is paved for consortia to prospectively collect fresh frozen tumor tissue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sander Bins
- Center for Personalized Cancer Treatment, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Departments of Medical Oncology
| | - Geert A Cirkel
- Center for Personalized Cancer Treatment, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht Cancer Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Christa G Gadellaa-Van Hooijdonk
- Center for Personalized Cancer Treatment, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht Cancer Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Fleur Weeber
- Center for Personalized Cancer Treatment, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Departments of Molecular Oncology
| | - Isaac J Numan
- Center for Personalized Cancer Treatment, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Center for Molecular Medicine
| | - Annette H Bruggink
- Center for Personalized Cancer Treatment, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Central Biobank
| | - Paul J van Diest
- Center for Personalized Cancer Treatment, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Departments of Pathology
| | - Stefan M Willems
- Center for Personalized Cancer Treatment, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Departments of Pathology
| | - Wouter B Veldhuis
- Center for Personalized Cancer Treatment, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Rob J de Knegt
- Center for Personalized Cancer Treatment, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marco J Koudijs
- Center for Personalized Cancer Treatment, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht Cancer Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Erik van Werkhoven
- Center for Personalized Cancer Treatment, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Biometrics
| | - Ron H J Mathijssen
- Center for Personalized Cancer Treatment, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Departments of Medical Oncology
| | - Edwin Cuppen
- Center for Personalized Cancer Treatment, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Center for Molecular Medicine
- Cancer Genomics Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Stefan Sleijfer
- Center for Personalized Cancer Treatment, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Departments of Medical Oncology
- Cancer Genomics Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jan H M Schellens
- Center for Personalized Cancer Treatment, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Medical Oncology and Clinical Pharmacology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek-The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Science Faculty, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Emile E Voest
- Center for Personalized Cancer Treatment, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Science Faculty, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marlies H G Langenberg
- Center for Personalized Cancer Treatment, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht Cancer Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Maja J A de Jonge
- Center for Personalized Cancer Treatment, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Departments of Medical Oncology
| | - Neeltje Steeghs
- Center for Personalized Cancer Treatment, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Medical Oncology and Clinical Pharmacology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek-The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Martijn P Lolkema
- Center for Personalized Cancer Treatment, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Departments of Medical Oncology
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Lolkema MP, Bohets HH, Arkenau HT, Lampo A, Barale E, de Jonge MJA, van Doorn L, Hellemans P, de Bono JS, Eskens FALM. The c-Met Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor JNJ-38877605 Causes Renal Toxicity through Species-Specific Insoluble Metabolite Formation. Clin Cancer Res 2015; 21:2297-2304. [PMID: 25745036 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-14-3258] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2014] [Accepted: 02/11/2015] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The receptor tyrosine kinase c-Met plays an important role in tumorigenesis and is a novel target for anticancer treatment. This phase I, first-in-human trial, explored safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and initial antitumor activity of JNJ-38877605, a potent and selective c-Met inhibitor. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN We performed a phase I dose-escalation study according to the standard 3+3 design. RESULTS Even at subtherapeutic doses, mild though recurrent renal toxicity was observed in virtually all patients. Renal toxicity had not been observed in preclinical studies in rats and dogs. Additional preclinical studies pointed toward the rabbit as a suitable toxicology model, as the formation of the M10 metabolite of JNJ-38877605 specifically occurred in rabbits and humans. Additional toxicology studies in rabbits clearly demonstrated that JNJ-38877605 induced species-specific renal toxicity. Histopathological evaluation in rabbits revealed renal crystal formation with degenerative and inflammatory changes. Identification of the components of these renal crystals revealed M1/3 and M5/6 metabolites. Accordingly, it was found that humans and rabbits showed significantly increased systemic exposure to these metabolites relative to other species. These main culprit insoluble metabolites were generated by aldehyde oxidase activity. Alternative dosing schedules of JNJ-3877605 and concomitant probenecid administration in rabbits failed to prevent renal toxicity at dose levels that could be pharmacologically active. CONCLUSIONS Combined clinical and correlative preclinical studies suggest that renal toxicity of JNJ-38877605 is caused by the formation of species-specific insoluble metabolites. These observations preclude further clinical development of JNJ-38877605.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martijn P Lolkema
- Phase I Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Surrey & London, United Kingdom.,Dept. of medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Ann Lampo
- Janssen Research and Development, Beerse, Belgium
| | - Erio Barale
- Janssen Research and Development, Beerse, Belgium
| | - Maja J A de Jonge
- Dept. of medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Leni van Doorn
- Dept. of medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Johann S de Bono
- Phase I Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Surrey & London, United Kingdom
| | - Ferry A L M Eskens
- Dept. of medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
van der Biessen DAJ, Burger H, de Bruijn P, Lamers CHJ, Naus N, Loferer H, Wiemer EAC, Mathijssen RHJ, de Jonge MJA. Phase I study of RGB-286638, a novel, multitargeted cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor in patients with solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res 2014; 20:4776-83. [PMID: 25024258 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-14-0325] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE RGB-286638 is a multitargeted inhibitor with targets comprising the family of cyclin-dependent kinases (CDK) and a range of other cancer-relevant tyrosine and serine/threonine kinases. The objectives of this first in human trial of RGB-286638, given i.v. on days 1 to 5 every 28 days, were to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and to evaluate the pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) profiles of this new drug. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN Sequential cohorts of 3 to 6 patients were treated per dose level. Blood, urine samples, and skin biopsies for full PK and/or PD analyses were collected. RESULTS Twenty-six patients were enrolled in 6-dose levels from 10 to 160 mg/d. Four dose-limiting toxicities were observed in 2 of the 6 patients enrolled at the highest dose level. These toxicities were AST/ALT elevations in 1 patient, paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardias (SVTs), hypotension, and an increase in troponin T in another patient. The plasma PK of RGB-286638 was shown to be linear over the studied doses. The interpatient variability in clearance was moderate (variation coefficient 7%-36%). The PD analyses in peripheral blood mononuclear cells, serum (apoptosis induction) and skin biopsies (Rb, p-Rb, Ki-67, and p27(KIP1) expression) did not demonstrate a consistent modulation of mechanism-related biomarkers with the exception of lowered Ki-67 levels at the MTD level. The recommended MTD for phase II studies is 120 mg/d. CONCLUSIONS RGB-286638 is tolerated when administered at 120 mg/d for 5 days every 28 days. Prolonged disease stabilization (range, 2-14 months) was seen across different dose levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Herman Burger
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Peter de Bruijn
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Cor H J Lamers
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Nicole Naus
- Department of Ophthalmology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Erik A C Wiemer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ron H J Mathijssen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Maja J A de Jonge
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
De Vos FYFL, Middelburg TA, Seynaeve C, de Jonge MJA. Ecthyma gangrenosum caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a patient with astrocytoma treated with chemotherapy. Kansenshogaku Zasshi 2014; 88:37-39. [PMID: 24979953] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
Ecthyma gangrenosum, presenting as embolic lesions caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection, has distinct pathognomonic features and a high mortality rate in patients with bacteremia, but when recognized early is easily treated. In this case report we describe this disseminated infection in an adult patient treated with chemotherapy for an astrocytoma.
Collapse
|
25
|
Eskens FALM, Ramos FJ, Burger H, O'Brien JP, Piera A, de Jonge MJA, Mizui Y, Wiemer EAC, Carreras MJ, Baselga J, Tabernero J. Phase I pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study of the first-in-class spliceosome inhibitor E7107 in patients with advanced solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res 2013; 19:6296-304. [PMID: 23983259 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-13-0485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 183] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and clinical activity of E7107 administered as 5-minute bolus infusions on days 1, 8, and 15 in a 28-day schedule. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN Patients with solid tumors refractory to standard therapies or with no standard treatment available were enrolled. Dose levels of 0.6 to 4.5 mg/m(2) were explored. RESULTS Forty patients [24M/16F, median age 61 years (45-79)] were enrolled. At 4.5 mg/m(2), dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) consisted of grade 3 diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting and grade 4 diarrhea, respectively, in two patients. At 4.0 mg/m(2), DLT (grade 3 nausea, vomiting, and abdominal cramps) was observed in one patient. Frequently occurring side effects were mainly gastrointestinal. After drug discontinuation at 4.0 mg/m(2), one patient experienced reversible grade 4 blurred vision. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) is 4.0 mg/m(2). No complete or partial responses during treatment were observed; one patient at 4.0 mg/m(2) had a confirmed partial response after drug discontinuation. Pharmacokinetic analysis revealed a large volume of distribution, high systemic clearance, and a plasma elimination half-life of 5.3 to 15.1 hours. Overall drug exposure increased in a dose-dependent manner. At the MTD, mRNA levels of selected target genes monitored in peripheral blood mononuclear cells showed a reversible 15- to 25-fold decrease, whereas unspliced pre-mRNA levels of DNAJB1 and EIF4A1 showed a reversible 10- to 25-fold increase. CONCLUSION The MTD for E7107 using this schedule is 4.0 mg/m(2). Pharmacokinetics is dose-dependent and reproducible within patients. Pharmacodynamic analysis revealed dose-dependent reversible inhibition of pre-mRNA processing of target genes, confirming proof-of-principle activity of E7107.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ferry A L M Eskens
- Authors' Affiliations: Erasmus University Medical Center, Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Vall d'Hebron University Hospital and Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Eisai Inc., Woodcliff Lake, New Jersey; Eisai Inc., Tsukuba, Japan; and Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
van der Biessen DAJ, Cranendonk MA, Schiavon G, van der Holt B, Wiemer EAC, Eskens FALM, Verweij J, de Jonge MJA, Mathijssen RHJ. Evaluation of patient enrollment in oncology phase I clinical trials. Oncologist 2013; 18:323-9. [PMID: 23429738 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2012-0334] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION For anticancer drug development, it is crucial that patients participate in early-phase clinical trials. The main aim of this study was to gain insight into the motivations and other variables influencing patients in their decision to participate in phase I oncology trials. MATERIALS AND METHODS Over a period of 25 months, all patients who were informed about (specific) phase I trials in our cancer center were retrospectively included in this study. Data on providing informed consent and final phase I enrollment were collected. RESULTS In total, 365 patients, with a median age of 59 years and a median World Health Organization performance status score of 1, were evaluated. The majority of patients (71%) were pretreated with systemic therapy, with a median of two lines. After specific study information had been given, 145 patients (40%) declined informed consent, 54% of them mainly because of low expectations regarding treatment benefits and concerns about potential side effects. Patients who had received previous systemic therapy consented more frequently than others. After initial consent, 61 patients (17%) still did not receive study treatment, mostly because of secondary withdrawal of consent or rapid clinical deterioration prior to first dosing. DISCUSSION After specific referral to our hospital for participation in early clinical trials, only 44% of all patients who were informed about a specific phase I trial eventually participated. Reasons for both participation and nonparticipation were diverse. Patient participation rates could be improved by forming an experienced and dedicated study team.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diane A J van der Biessen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus University Medical Center – Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
de Jonge MJA, Hamberg P, Verweij J, Savage S, Suttle AB, Hodge J, Arumugham T, Pandite LN, Hurwitz HI. Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of pazopanib and lapatinib combination therapy in patients with advanced solid tumors. Invest New Drugs 2012; 31:751-9. [DOI: 10.1007/s10637-012-9885-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2012] [Accepted: 09/25/2012] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|
28
|
Bos WEM, Nijsten TEC, de Jonge MJA, Hamberg AP. Topical psoralen plus UV-A therapy for tyrosine kinase inhibitor-induced hand-foot syndrome. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2012; 148:546-7. [PMID: 22508887 DOI: 10.1001/archdermatol.2011.3482] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
|
29
|
Eskens FALM, de Jonge MJA, Bhargava P, Isoe T, Cotreau MM, Esteves B, Hayashi K, Burger H, Thomeer M, van Doorn L, Verweij J. Biologic and clinical activity of tivozanib (AV-951, KRN-951), a selective inhibitor of VEGF receptor-1, -2, and -3 tyrosine kinases, in a 4-week-on, 2-week-off schedule in patients with advanced solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res 2011; 17:7156-63. [PMID: 21976547 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-11-0411] [Citation(s) in RCA: 76] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the maximum tolerated dose (MTD)/dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of tivozanib, a potent and selective oral VEGF receptor (VEGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN Dose levels of 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 mg/d tivozanib for 28 days followed by 14 days of medication were explored in patients with advanced solid tumors. RESULTS Forty-one patients were enrolled. Animal data incorrectly predicted toxicity, resulting in DLTs at the starting dose (2.0 mg) consisting of grade 3 proteinuria and hypertension and grade 3 ataxia. At 1.0 mg, no DLT was observed. At an intermediate dose (1.5 mg), 1 patient experienced DLT consisting of grade 3 hypertension. This dose was determined as the MTD. Of 10 additional patients treated at 1.5 mg, 1 patient each experienced grade 3 hypertension and grade 3 fatigue, and 2 patients experienced grade 3 and 4 transaminase elevation. In 12 additional patients treated at 1.0 mg, no DLT was observed. Pharmacokinetics displayed long absorption time, dose proportional exposure, and a half-life of 4.7 days. Plasma levels of VEGF-A and soluble VEGFR-2 showed dose-dependent increases and decreases, respectively. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI indicated reduction in tumor perfusion. Clinical activity was observed in renal cell cancer, colorectal cancer, and other tumors. CONCLUSION Tivozanib was well tolerated with manageable side effects. The pharmacokinetics profile revealed that tivozanib was suitable for once-daily dosing. Encouraging and durable clinical activity was observed. The recommended daily dose of tivozanib in a 4-week-on and 2-week-off dosing regimen is 1.5 mg.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ferry A L M Eskens
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Steeghs N, Mathijssen RHJ, Wessels JAM, de Graan AJ, van der Straaten T, Mariani M, Laffranchi B, Comis S, de Jonge MJA, Gelderblom H, Guchelaar HJ. Influence of pharmacogenetic variability on the pharmacokinetics and toxicity of the aurora kinase inhibitor danusertib. Invest New Drugs 2010; 29:953-62. [PMID: 20182906 PMCID: PMC3160560 DOI: 10.1007/s10637-010-9405-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2010] [Accepted: 02/09/2010] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Objectives Danusertib is a serine/threonine kinase inhibitor of multiple kinases, including aurora-A, B, and C. This explorative study aims to identify possible relationships between single nucleotide polymorphisms in genes coding for drug metabolizing enzymes and transporter proteins and clearance of danusertib, to clarify the interpatient variability in exposure. In addition, this study explores the relationship between target receptor polymorphisms and toxicity of danusertib. Methods For associations with clearance, 48 cancer patients treated in a phase I study were analyzed for ABCB1, ABCG2 and FMO3 polymorphisms. Association analyses between neutropenia and drug target receptors, including KDR, RET, FLT3, FLT4, AURKB and AURKA, were performed in 30 patients treated at recommended phase II dose-levels in three danusertib phase I or phase II trials. Results No relationships between danusertib clearance and drug metabolizing enzymes and transporter protein polymorphisms were found. Only, for the one patient with FMO3 18281AA polymorphism, a significantly higher clearance was noticed, compared to patients carrying at least 1 wild type allele. No effect of target receptor genotypes or haplotypes on neutropenia was observed. Conclusions As we did not find any major correlations between pharmacogenetic variability in the studied enzymes and transporters and pharmacokinetics nor toxicity, it is unlikely that danusertib is highly susceptible for pharmacogenetic variation. Therefore, no dosing alterations of danusertib are expected in the future, based on the polymorphisms studied. However, the relationship between FMO3 polymorphisms and clearance of danusertib warrants further research, as we could study only a small group of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neeltje Steeghs
- Department of Clinical Oncology, K1-P, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Steeghs N, Eskens FALM, Gelderblom H, Verweij J, Nortier JWR, Ouwerkerk J, van Noort C, Mariani M, Spinelli R, Carpinelli P, Laffranchi B, de Jonge MJA. Phase I pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study of the aurora kinase inhibitor danusertib in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27:5094-101. [PMID: 19770380 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2008.21.6655] [Citation(s) in RCA: 85] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Danusertib (PHA-739358) is a small-molecule pan-aurora kinase inhibitor. This phase I dose escalation study was conducted to evaluate safety and tolerability of danusertib with additional pharmacokinetic, biomarker, and efficacy assessments. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with solid tumors refractory to standard therapies or with no standard therapy available were enrolled. Danusertib was administered intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days in 6-hour or 3-hour infusion schedules (ie, 6-hour IVS or 3-hour IVS). Dose levels from 45 mg/m(2) in the 6-hour IVS, and from 250 mg/m(2) in the 3-hour IVS, were studied. RESULTS Fifty patients were treated. For the 6-hour IVS, the most frequently reported adverse effects were neutropenia (55%), nausea (25%), anorexia (23%), fatigue (20%), and diarrhea (18%). In the 3-hour IVS, fatigue (70%), neutropenia (60%), diarrhea (50%), and nausea (30%) were seen. Nonhematologic toxicity was mild to moderate. Neutropenia was dose limiting. The maximum-tolerated dose was 330 mg/m(2) for the 6-hour IVS and was not identified for the 3-hour IVS. The systemic exposure to danusertib increased linearly with dose. The infusion rate did not appear to remarkably influence the pharmacokinetics of danusertib. Biomarker analysis showed inhibition of histone H3 phosphorylation, indicative of aurora B inhibition, at doses of 190 mg/m(2) or greater. Stable disease was observed in 23.7% of evaluable patients, and disease stabilization occurred in 6 or more months in five patients. CONCLUSION Dose-limiting toxicity of danusertib is neutropenia, which was short lasting and generally uncomplicated; danusertib administration had limited nonhematologic toxicity. The recommended dose of danusertib for phase II studies is 330 mg/m(2) infused over 6 hours on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neeltje Steeghs
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Eskens FALM, Steeghs N, Verweij J, Bloem JL, Christensen O, van Doorn L, Ouwerkerk J, de Jonge MJA, Nortier JWR, Kraetzschmar J, Rajagopalan P, Gelderblom H. Phase I dose escalation study of telatinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 and 3, platelet-derived growth factor receptor beta, and c-Kit, in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27:4169-76. [PMID: 19636022 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2008.18.8193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Telatinib (BAY 57-9352) is an orally available tyrosine kinase inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) -2, VEGFR-3, platelet-derived growth factor receptor-beta, and c-Kit. This phase I dose escalation study was conducted to evaluate the safety and tolerability of telatinib, with additional pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and efficacy assessments. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with solid tumors refractory to standard therapies or with no standard therapy available were enrolled. Doses of continuously administered telatinib were escalated from 20 mg once daily to 1,500 mg twice daily. RESULTS Fifty-three patients were enrolled. Most frequently observed drug-related adverse events were nausea (26.4%; grade >or= 3, 0%) and hypertension (20.8%; grade 3, 11.3%; grade 4, 0%). Two dose-limiting toxicities were observed: one poorly controlled hypertension (600 mg twice daily), and one grade 2 weight loss, anorexia, and fatigue (1,500 mg twice daily). A formal maximum-tolerated dose was not reached. Telatinib was rapidly absorbed, with median time to peak concentration (t(max)) lower than 3 hours after dose. A nearly dose-proportional increase in exposure was observed with substantial variability. Telatinib half-life averaged 5.5 hours. Biomarker analyses showed dose-dependent increase in VEGF levels and decrease in plasma soluble VEGFR-2 levels, with a plateau at 900 mg twice daily. A decrease in tumor blood flow (K(trans) and IAUC(60)) was observed with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Best tumor response was stable disease, observed in 50.9% of patients. CONCLUSION Telatinib was safe and well tolerated up to 1,500 mg twice daily. Based on pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic end points, telatinib 900 mg twice daily is the recommended dose for subsequent phase II studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ferry A L M Eskens
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus University Medical Center, PO Box 2040, Rotterdam, 3000 CA, the Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
van der Bol JM, Mathijssen RHJ, Loos WJ, Friberg LE, van Schaik RHN, de Jonge MJA, Planting AST, Verweij J, Sparreboom A, de Jong FA. Cigarette smoking and irinotecan treatment: pharmacokinetic interaction and effects on neutropenia. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25:2719-26. [PMID: 17563393 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2006.09.6115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 92] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Several constituents of cigarette smoke are known to interact with drug metabolizing enzymes and potentially affect treatment outcome with substrate drugs. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of cigarette smoking on the pharmacokinetics and adverse effects of irinotecan. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 190 patients (49 smokers, 141 nonsmokers) treated with irinotecan (90-minute intravenous administration on a 3-week schedule) were evaluated for pharmacokinetics. Complete toxicity data were available in a subset of 134 patients receiving 350 mg/m2 or 600 mg flat-fixed dose irinotecan. RESULTS In smokers, the dose-normalized area under the plasma concentration-time curve of irinotecan was significantly lower (median, 28.7 v 33.9 ng x h/mL/mg; P = .001) compared with nonsmokers. In addition, smokers showed an almost 40% lower exposure to SN-38 (median, 0.54 v 0.87 ng x h/mL/mg; P < .001) and a higher relative extent of glucuronidation of SN-38 into SN-38G (median, 6.6 v 4.5; P = .006). Smokers experienced considerably less hematologic toxicity. In particular, the incidence of grade 3 to 4 neutropenia was 6% in smokers versus 38% in nonsmokers (odds ratio [OR], 0.10; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.43; P < .001). There was no significant difference in incidence of delayed-onset diarrhea (6% v 15%; OR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.07 to 1.57; P = .149). CONCLUSION This study indicates that smoking significantly lowers both the exposure to irinotecan and treatment-induced neutropenia, indicating a potential risk of treatment failure. Although the underlying mechanism is not entirely clear, modulation of CYP3A and uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase isoform 1A1 may be part of the explanation. The data suggest that additional investigation is warranted to determine whether smokers are at increased risk for treatment failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica M van der Bol
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
de Jong FA, Kehrer DFS, Mathijssen RHJ, Creemers GJ, de Bruijn P, van Schaik RHN, Planting AST, van der Gaast A, Eskens FALM, Janssen JTP, Ruit JB, Verweij J, Sparreboom A, de Jonge MJA. Prophylaxis of irinotecan-induced diarrhea with neomycin and potential role for UGT1A1*28 genotype screening: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Oncologist 2006; 11:944-54. [PMID: 16951398 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.11-8-944] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Delayed-type diarrhea is a common side effect of irinotecan and is associated with a bacterial-mediated formation of the active irinotecan metabolite SN-38 from its glucuronide conjugate in the intestine. Based on a pilot study, we hypothesized that concomitant administration of the antibiotic neomycin would diminish exposure of the gut to SN-38 and ameliorate the incidence and severity of diarrhea. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients were treated with irinotecan in a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Eligible patients received irinotecan (350 mg/m(2) once every 3 weeks) combined with neomycin (660 mg three times daily for three consecutive days, starting 2 days before chemotherapy) or combined with placebo. Blood samples were obtained for additional pharmacokinetic and pharmacogenetic analyses. RESULTS Sixty-two patients were evaluable for the toxicity analysis. Baseline patient characteristics, systemic SN-38 exposure, and UGT1A1*28 genotype status (i.e., an additional TA repeat in the promoter region of uridine diphosphate-glucuronosyltransferase isoform 1A1) were similar in both arms. Although distribution, severity, and duration of delayed-type diarrhea did not differ significantly between arms, grade 3 diarrhea tended to be less frequent in the neomycin arm. The presence of at least one UGT1A1*28 allele was strongly related to the incidence of grade 2-3 diarrhea. In the neomycin arm, grade 2 nausea was significantly more common. CONCLUSION Our results do not suggest a major role for neomycin as prophylaxis for irinotecan-induced delayed-type diarrhea. It is suggested that the UGT1A1*28 genotype status could be used as a screening tool for a priori prevention of irinotecan-induced delayed-type diarrhea.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Floris A de Jong
- Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam-Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Room AS-15, Groene Hilledijk 301, NL-3075 EA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Lee CP, de Jonge MJA, O'Donnell AE, Schothorst KL, Hanwell J, Chick JB, Brooimans RA, Adams LM, Drolet DW, de Bono JS, Kaye SB, Judson IR, Verweij J. A Phase I Study of a New Nucleoside Analogue, OSI-7836, Using Two Administration Schedules in Patients with Advanced Solid Malignancies. Clin Cancer Res 2006; 12:2841-8. [PMID: 16675579 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-05-1932] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic profile of the novel nucleoside analogue OSI-7836 in patients with advanced solid malignancies. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN OSI-7836 was initially given as a 60-minute i.v. infusion on day 1 every 21 days. In view of its dose-limiting toxicities, the administration time was amended to a 5-minute bolus, and subsequently, the schedule was amended to weekly for 4 weeks followed by a 2-week rest. Blood and urine samples were collected for pharmacokinetic studies. Analyses of cytokines and lymphocyte subsets were added later in the study to elucidate a mechanism for the severe fatigue and lymphocyte depletion observed in earlier patients. RESULTS Thirty patients received a total of 61 treatment cycles. Fatigue was the main dose-limiting toxicity. Maximum-tolerated dose was defined as 300 mg/m2 in the 60-minute infusion, (three times per week) schedule; 400 mg/m2 in the 5-minute bolus infusion, (three times per week) schedule; and 100 mg/m2 in the weekly schedule. Other common toxicities were nausea, vomiting, rash, fever, and a flu-like syndrome. There were no clinically significant hematologic toxicities. Following the initial dose, OSI-7836 was eliminated from plasma with a median (range) elimination half-life of 48.3 minutes (22.6-64.8 minutes). Lymphocyte subset analysis showed a significant drop in B cell counts, which persisted to day 14 and beyond. Cytokine analysis showed significant elevations of interleukin-6 and interleukin-10 in all patients who received > or = 200 mg/m2 OSI-7836. Best response was disease stabilization in seven patients. CONCLUSION OSI-7836 was associated with excessive fatigue, and despite changes in its schedule and duration of administration, we did not observe an improvement in its tolerability. Its potentially selective effect on B lymphocytes could be exploited in further studies in specific hematologic malignancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chooi P Lee
- Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, United Kingdom.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Abstract
Chemotherapeutic agents can produce a variety of acute and chronic organ toxicities. Since many antitumor drugs and their metabolites are cleared renally, the kidneys are vulnerable to injury. The drugs involved will determine the site of injury within the kidney, resulting in clinical manifestations ranging from an asymptomatic rise in serum creatinine to acute renal failure. The most common renal toxicities of chemotherapeutic agents are described.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maja J A de Jonge
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center/Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Abstract
In the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer, irinotecan has become one of the most important drugs, despite its sometimes unpredictable adverse effects. To understand why some patients experience severe adverse effects (diarrhea and neutropenia), while others do not, the metabolic pathways of this drug have to be unraveled in detail. Individual variation in expression of several phase I and phase II metabolizing enzymes and ABC-transporters involved in irinotecan metabolism and excretion, at least partly explains the observed pharmacokinetic interpatient variability. Although the difference in expression-level of these proteins to a certain amount is explained by physiologic and environmental factors, the presence of specific genetic determinants also does influence their expression and function. In this review, the role of genetic polymorphisms in the main enzyme-systems (carboxylesterase, cytochrome P450 3A, and uridine diphosphate-glucuronosyltransferase) and ABC-transporters (ABCB1, ABCC2, and ABCG2) involved in irinotecan metabolism, are discussed. Since at this moment the field of pharmacogenetics and pharmacogenomics is rapidly expanding and simultaneously more rapid and cost-effective screening methods are emerging, a wealth of future data is expected to enrich our knowledge of the genetic basis of irinotecan metabolism. Eventually, this may help to truly individualize the dosing of this (and other) anti-cancer agent(s), using a personal genetic profile of the most relevant enzymes for every patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Floris A de Jong
- Department of Medical Oncology, Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Groene Hilledijk 301, 3075 EA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
de Jonge MJA, van der Gaast A, Planting AST, van Doorn L, Lems A, Boot I, Wanders J, Satomi M, Verweij J. Phase I and Pharmacokinetic Study of the Dolastatin 10 Analogue TZT-1027, Given on Days 1 and 8 of a 3-Week Cycle in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors. Clin Cancer Res 2005; 11:3806-13. [PMID: 15897580 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-04-1937] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE TZT-1027 [N(2)-(N,N-dimethyl-l-valyl)-N-[(1S,2R)-2-methoxy-4-[(2S)-2-[(1R,2R)-1-methoxy-2-methyl-3-oxo-3-[(2-phenylethyl)]amino]propyl]-1-pyrrolidinyl]-1-[(S)-1-methylpropyl]-4-oxobutyl]-N-methyl-l-valinamide] is a cytotoxic dolastatin 10 derivative inhibiting microtubule assembly through the binding to tubulins. The objectives of this phase I study was to assess the dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), to determine the maximum tolerated dose, and to study the pharmacokinetics of TZT-1027 when given i.v. over 60 minutes on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks to patients with advanced solid tumors. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN Patients were treated with escalating doses of TZT-1027 at doses ranging from 1.35 to 2.7 mg/m(2). For pharmacokinetic analysis, plasma sampling was done during the first and second course and assayed using a validated high-performance liquid chromatographic assay with mass spectrometric detection. RESULTS Seventeen patients received a total of >70 courses. The stopping dose was reached at 2.7 mg/m(2), with neutropenia and infusion arm pain as DLT. Neutropenia was not complicated by fever. Over all dose levels, eight patients experienced pain in the infusion arm 1 to 2 days after administration of the drug, which seemed ameliorated by adding additional flushing after drug administration. Other side effects included nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and fatigue. One partial response lasting >54 weeks was observed in an extensively pretreated patient with metastatic liposarcoma. The pharmacokinetics of TZT-1027 suggested linearity over the dose ranges. No correlation between body surface area and absolute CL of TZT-1027 was established, vindicating that a flat dosing regimen might be used in the future. A correlation was observed between the percentage decrease in neutrophil count and the AUC of TZT-1027. CONCLUSIONS In this study, the DLT of TZT-1027 was neutropenia and infusion arm pain. The recommended dose for phase II studies of TZT-1027 is 2.4 mg/m(2) given i.v. over 60 minutes, on days 1 and 8 every 21 days. Phase II studies have recently started.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maja J A de Jonge
- Erasmus University Medical Center/Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Soepenberg O, Dumez H, Verweij J, de Jong FA, de Jonge MJA, Thomas J, Eskens FALM, van Schaik RHN, Selleslach J, Ter Steeg J, Lefebvre P, Assadourian S, Sanderink GJ, Sparreboom A, van Oosterom AT. Phase I Pharmacokinetic, Food Effect, and Pharmacogenetic Study of Oral Irinotecan Given as Semisolid Matrix Capsules in Patients with Solid Tumors. Clin Cancer Res 2005; 11:1504-11. [PMID: 15746053 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-04-1758] [Citation(s) in RCA: 79] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To characterize the maximum-tolerated dose, recommended dose, dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), pharmacokinetic profile, and food effect of orally administered irinotecan formulated as new semisolid matrix capsules. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN Irinotecan was given orally in fasted patients once daily for 5 consecutive days and repeated every 3 weeks. Patients were randomly assigned to take the drug along with a high-fat, high-calorie breakfast for the administration at day 1 of the first or second cycle. Dosages tested were 70 and 80 mg/m(2)/day. RESULTS Twenty-five patients received 101 cycles of therapy (median two cycles, range 1-15). During the first cycle, grade 3 delayed diarrhea and grade 3 fever were the DLTs at the dosage of 80 mg/m(2)/day in three out of five patients. Hematologic and nonhematologic toxicities were mild to moderate. Exposure to the active metabolite SN-38 was relatively high compared with i.v. infusion, but no relevant accumulation was observed. Food had no significant effect on irinotecan pharmacokinetics. One confirmed partial remission and 10 disease stabilizations were observed in previously treated patients. No association was found between the UGT1A1*28 genotype and the risk of severe irinotecan-induced toxicity. CONCLUSIONS For oral irinotecan, a dose of 70 mg/m(2)/day for 5 consecutive days every 3 weeks is recommended for further studies. Delayed diarrhea was the main DLT, similar to that observed with intravenously administered irinotecan. This study confirms that oral administration of irinotecan is feasible and may have favorable pharmacokinetic characteristics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Otto Soepenberg
- Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Groene Hilledijk 301, 3075 EA Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Soepenberg O, de Jonge MJA, Sparreboom A, de Bruin P, Eskens FALM, de Heus G, Wanders J, Cheverton P, Ducharme MP, Verweij J. Phase I and Pharmacokinetic Study of DE-310 in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors. Clin Cancer Res 2005. [DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.703.11.2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose: To assess the maximum-tolerated dose, toxicity, and pharmacokinetics of DE-310, a macromolecular prodrug of the topoisomerase I inhibitor exatecan (DX-8951f). in patients with advanced solid tumors.
Experimental Design: Patients received DE-310 as a 3-hour infusion once every 2 weeks (dose, 1.0-2.0 mg/m2) or once every 6 weeks (dose, 6.0-9.0 mg/m2). Because pharmacokinetics revealed a drug terminal half-life exceeding the 2 weeks administration interval, the protocol was amended to a 6-week interval between administrations also based on available information from a parallel trial using an every 4 weeks schedule. Conjugated DX-8951 (the carrier-linked molecule), and the metabolites DX-8951 and glycyl-DX-8951 were assayed in various matrices up to 35 days post first and second dose.
Results: Twenty-seven patients were enrolled into the study and received a total of 86 administrations. Neutropenia and grade 3 thrombocytopenia, and grade 3 hepatotoxicity with veno-occlusive disease, were dose-limiting toxicities. Other hematologic and nonhematologic toxicities were mild to moderate and reversible. The apparent half-life of conjugated DX-8951, glycyl-DX-8951, and DX-8951 was 13 days. The area under the curve ratio for conjugated DX-8951 to DX-8951 was 600. No drug concentration was detectable in erythrocytes, skin, and saliva, although low levels of glycyl-DX-8951 and DX-8951 were detectable in tumor biopsies. One patient with metastatic adenocarcinoma of unknown primary achieved a histologically proven complete remission. One confirmed partial remission was observed in a patient with metastatic pancreatic cancer and disease stabilization was noted in 14 additional patients.
Conclusions: The recommended phase II dose of DE-310 is 7.5 mg/m2 given once every 6 weeks. The active moiety DX-8951 is released slowly from DE-310 and over an extended period, achieving the desired prolonged exposure to this topoisomerase I inhibitor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Otto Soepenberg
- 1From the Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Maja J. A. de Jonge
- 1From the Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Alex Sparreboom
- 1From the Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Peter de Bruin
- 1From the Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ferry A. L. M. Eskens
- 1From the Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Gerda de Heus
- 1From the Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jantien Wanders
- 2Daiichi Pharmaceuticals UK Ltd., London, United Kingdom; and
| | - Peter Cheverton
- 2Daiichi Pharmaceuticals UK Ltd., London, United Kingdom; and
| | | | - Jaap Verweij
- 1From the Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Soepenberg O, de Jonge MJA, Sparreboom A, de Bruin P, Eskens FALM, de Heus G, Wanders J, Cheverton P, Ducharme MP, Verweij J. Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of DE-310 in patients with advanced solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res 2005; 11:703-11. [PMID: 15701859] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/01/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the maximum-tolerated dose, toxicity, and pharmacokinetics of DE-310, a macromolecular prodrug of the topoisomerase I inhibitor exatecan (DX-8951f). in patients with advanced solid tumors. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN Patients received DE-310 as a 3-hour infusion once every 2 weeks (dose, 1.0-2.0 mg/m(2)) or once every 6 weeks (dose, 6.0-9.0 mg/m(2)). Because pharmacokinetics revealed a drug terminal half-life exceeding the 2 weeks administration interval, the protocol was amended to a 6-week interval between administrations also based on available information from a parallel trial using an every 4 weeks schedule. Conjugated DX-8951 (the carrier-linked molecule), and the metabolites DX-8951 and glycyl-DX-8951 were assayed in various matrices up to 35 days post first and second dose. RESULTS Twenty-seven patients were enrolled into the study and received a total of 86 administrations. Neutropenia and grade 3 thrombocytopenia, and grade 3 hepatotoxicity with veno-occlusive disease, were dose-limiting toxicities. Other hematologic and nonhematologic toxicities were mild to moderate and reversible. The apparent half-life of conjugated DX-8951, glycyl-DX-8951, and DX-8951 was 13 days. The area under the curve ratio for conjugated DX-8951 to DX-8951 was 600. No drug concentration was detectable in erythrocytes, skin, and saliva, although low levels of glycyl-DX-8951 and DX-8951 were detectable in tumor biopsies. One patient with metastatic adenocarcinoma of unknown primary achieved a histologically proven complete remission. One confirmed partial remission was observed in a patient with metastatic pancreatic cancer and disease stabilization was noted in 14 additional patients. CONCLUSIONS The recommended phase II dose of DE-310 is 7.5 mg/m(2) given once every 6 weeks. The active moiety DX-8951 is released slowly from DE-310 and over an extended period, achieving the desired prolonged exposure to this topoisomerase I inhibitor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Otto Soepenberg
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Groene Hilledijk 301, 3075 EA Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Gelderblom H, Salazar R, Verweij J, Pentheroudakis G, de Jonge MJA, Devlin M, van Hooije C, Seguy F, Obach R, Pruñonosa J, Principe P, Twelves C. Phase I pharmacological and bioavailability study of oral diflomotecan (BN80915), a novel E-ring-modified camptothecin analogue in adults with solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res 2003; 9:4101-7. [PMID: 14519632] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/27/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Diflomotecan (BN80915) is an E-ring modified camptothecin analogue that possesses greater lactone stability in plasma compared with other topoisomerase I inhibitors, a potential advantage for antitumor activity. As with other camptothecins, oral administration has pharmacological and clinical advantages. This Phase I study was performed to assess the feasibility of the administration of oral diflomotecan, to determine the maximum-tolerated, dose its bioavailability, and to explore the pharmacokinetics. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN An initial i.v. bolus was administered to assess the bioavailability of diflomotecan. Fourteen days later, diflomotecan was administered p.o. once daily for 5 days to adult patients with solid malignant tumors and repeated every 3 weeks. BN80915 and its open lactone form BN80942 were measured. RESULTS Twenty-two patients entered the study and received a total of 57 cycles of oral diflomotecan at flat dose levels of 0.10, 0.20, 0.27, and 0.35 mg. The main toxicity was hematological, but some patients experienced alopecia, mild gastrointestinal toxicity, and fatigue. At the 0.35-mg dose level, 2 of 4 patients experienced dose-limiting toxicity comprising grade 3 thrombocytopenia with epistaxis and febrile neutropenia in 1 patient and uncomplicated grade 4 neutropenia lasting for >7 days in another. Toxicity was acceptable at the 0.27-mg dose level at which dose-limiting toxicities were observed in 3 of 12 patients (grade 4 neutropenia > 7 days, complicated by fever in 1 patient but without other signs of infection). After two cycles of diflomotecan, 6 patients had disease stabilization, which was maintained in 2 patients for 9 months and >1 year, respectively. Diflomotecan pharmacokinetics were linear over the dose range studied. Systemic exposure correlated with the fall in WBC counts. The mean oral bioavailability (+/-SD) was 72.24 +/- 59.2% across all dose levels. Urinary excretion of BN80915 was very low. CONCLUSIONS The recommended oral diflomotecan dose for Phase II studies is 0.27 mg/day x 5 every 3 weeks. This regimen is convenient and generally well tolerated with a favorable pharmacokinetic profile and high but variable bioavailability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hans Gelderblom
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC-Daniel den Hoed, 3008 AE Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
de Jonge MJA, Glimelius B, Verweij J, Van Groeningen C, Bonneterre J, de Vries EGE, Culine S, Young J, Smith R, Droz J. Effects of impaired renal function on the pharmacokinetics and toxicity of i.v. ZD9331, a novel non-polyglutamated thymidylate synthase inhibitor, in adult patients with solid tumors. Anticancer Drugs 2002; 13:645-53. [PMID: 12172511 DOI: 10.1097/00001813-200207000-00012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
ZD9331 is a potent thymidylate synthase inhibitor. Renal and hepatic clearances were found to be important routes of elimination. The objectives of this pharmacologic trial were to investigate the effect of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics of ZD9331, to study the toxicity profile and to document any antitumor effects of ZD9331 when administered i.v. to patients with different degrees of renal impairment. Patients were treated with ZD9331 130 mg/m2 given as an i.v. infusion on day 1 of a 4-week cycle to allow full pharmacokinetic assessment. Subsequent cycles involved the administration of ZD9331 on days 1 and 8, every 3 weeks. Patients were stratified according to their renal function assessed by the creatinine clearance: normal renal function (creatinine clearance > or =60 ml/min), mildly impaired renal function (creatinine clearance > or =40 to <60 ml/min) and moderately impaired renal function (creatinine clearance >25 to <40 ml/min). For pharmacokinetic analysis plasma sampling was performed during the first course and assayed using a validated liquid chromatographic tandem mass spectrometry assay. Twenty-three patients were entered on the study, of whom 21 received 130 mg/m2 ZD9331 in the first treatment cycle. No relationship was seen between renal impairment and plasma clearance nor with the area under the concentration-time curve of free ZD9331. Increasing renal impairment was associated with a greater incidence of myelosuppression. No predictive relationship between the clearance of free ZD9331 and the degree of renal impairment as determined by creatinine clearance could be assessed. However, data from this trial indicate that increased renal impairment may be associated with greater ZD9331-induced toxicity, particularly myelosuppression, although this cannot be attributed to any alteration in the plasma pharmacokinetics of ZD9331. Therefore, it may be necessary to administer a reduced dose of ZD9331 to patients with impaired renal function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maja J A de Jonge
- Department of Medical Oncology, Rotterdam Cancer Institute (Daniel den Hoed Kliniek) and University Hospital, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
de Jonge MJA, Punt CJA, Sparreboom A, Planting AST, Peters MEWJ, van De Schraaf J, Jackman A, Smith R, de Mulder PHM, Verweij J. Phase I and pharmacologic study of oral ZD9331, a novel nonpolyglutamated thymidylate synthase inhibitor, in adult patients with solid tumors. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20:1923-31. [PMID: 11919253 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2002.07.057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the toxicity profile and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), to determine the maximum-tolerated dose, and to study the pharmacokinetics of ZD9331 when administered orally to patients with advanced solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients were treated with oral ZD9331 given once daily (od) or twice daily (bid) for 5, 7, or 10 days; cycles were repeated every 21 days at doses ranging from 2.5 to 40 mg. For pharmacokinetic analysis, plasma sampling was performed during the first course and assayed using a validated liquid chromatographic-tandem mass spectrometry assay. Plasma levels of 2'-deoxyuridine were measured as a surrogate marker for TS inhibition. RESULTS Forty-two patients received a total of 166 courses. The DLTs were myelosuppression and skin rash. Dose escalation of oral ZD9331 from 2.5 to 40 mg, as a single daily dose, resulted in a less than proportional increase in the plasma area under the concentration-time curve of ZD9331. The plasma drug exposure per cycle for the schedules 20 mg od for 5 days, 10 mg od for 10 days, and 10 mg bid for 5 days, all resulting in a total dose per cycle of 100 mg, were comparable. One partial response was noted in a patient with gastric cancer. CONCLUSION DLTs in this phase I study of oral ZD9331 were myelosuppression and skin toxicity. The recommended dose for phase II studies of oral ZD9331 is 20 mg od for 5 consecutive days, every 3 weeks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maja J A de Jonge
- Department of Medical Oncology, Rotterdam Cancer Institute, University Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Kehrer DFS, Bos AM, Verweij J, Groen HJ, Loos WJ, Sparreboom A, de Jonge MJA, Hamilton M, Cameron T, de Vries EGE. Phase I and pharmacologic study of liposomal lurtotecan, NX 211: urinary excretion predicts hematologic toxicity. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20:1222-31. [PMID: 11870164 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2002.20.5.1222] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine the maximum-tolerated and recommended dose, toxicity profile, and pharmacokinetics of the liposomal topoisomerase I inhibitor lurtotecan (NX 211) administered as a 30-minute intravenous infusion once every 3 weeks in cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS NX 211 was administered by peripheral infusion. Dose escalation decisions were based on all toxicities during the first cycle as well as pharmacokinetic parameters. Serial plasma, whole blood, and urine samples were collected for up to 96 hours after the end of infusion, and drug levels were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography. RESULTS Twenty-nine patients (16 women; median age, 56 years; range, 39 to 74 years) received 77 courses of NX 211 at dose levels of 0.4 (n = 3), 0.8 (n = 6), 1.6 (n = 3), 3.2 (n = 6), 3.8 (n = 6), and 4.3 mg/m(2) (n = 5). Neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were the dose-limiting toxicities and were not cumulative. Other toxicities were mild to moderate. Nine patients had stable disease while undergoing treatment. The systemic clearance of lurtotecan in plasma and whole blood was 0.82 +/- 0.78 L/h/m(2) and 1.15 +/- 0.96 L/h/m(2), respectively. Urinary recovery (Fu) of lurtotecan was 10.1% +/- 4.05% (range, 4.9% to 18.9%). In contrast to systemic exposure measures, the dose excreted in urine (ie, dose x Fu) was significantly related to the percent decrease in neutrophil and platelet counts at nadir (P <.00001). CONCLUSION The dose-limiting toxicities of NX 211 are neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. The recommended dose for phase II studies is 3.8 mg/m(2) once every 3 weeks. Pharmacologic data suggest a relationship between exposure to lurtotecan and NX 211-induced clinical effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diederik F S Kehrer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Rotterdam Cancer Institute, Daniel den Hoed Kliniek and University Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Mathijssen RHJ, Verweij J, de Jonge MJA, Nooter K, Stoter G, Sparreboom A. Impact of body-size measures on irinotecan clearance: alternative dosing recommendations. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20:81-7. [PMID: 11773157 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2002.20.1.81] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate relationships between various body-size measures and irinotecan (CPT-11) clearance and metabolism in cancer patients, and to provide future dosing recommendations for this agent. PATIENTS AND METHODS Pharmacokinetic data were obtained from 82 adult patients (50 men, 32 women; median age, 54 years) receiving CPT-11 as a 90-minute intravenous infusion (dose range, 175 to 350 mg/m(2)). In each patient, plasma samples were collected at timed intervals in the first administration of a 3-week schedule, and CPT-11 and its metabolite, SN-38, were measured by a liquid chromatographic assay. RESULTS The mean (+/- SD) CPT-11 clearance was 33.6 +/- 10.8 L/h, with an interindividual variability (IIV) of 32.1%. When clearance was adjusted for body-surface area (BSA), the IIV was similar (34.0%). In addition, in a multiple linear regression analysis, none of the studied measures (BSA, lean body mass, [adjusted] ideal body weight, and body mass index) was a significant covariate (P >.13; r(2) <.014) in our population. Similarly, BSA did not significantly contribute to variability in the relative extent of conversion to SN-38 (P =.26). CONCLUSION BSA is not a predictor of CPT-11 clearance or SN-38 pharmacokinetics and does not contribute to reducing kinetic variability. These findings provide a rationale for the conduct of a comparative phase III study between BSA-based dosing and flat or fixed dosing of CPT-11.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ron H J Mathijssen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Rotterdam Cancer Institute (Daniel den Hoed Kliniek), 3008 AE Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|