PROACT 2.0: A new open-source tool to improve patient-doctor communication in clinical trials

The use of Digital Healthcare Products is leading to significant improvements in clinical practice. Herein, we discuss the development of PROACT 2.0 (Patient Reported Opinions About Clinical Tolerability v2.0), a novel open-source mobile and web application developed at Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori in Milan. It was developed in collaboration with The Christie, Manchester, in the context of work package 2 of the UpSMART Accelerator project, involving a consortium of referral cancer centers from the UK, Spain and Italy. PROACT 2.0 enhances communication between patients and healthcare providers in cancer clinical trials, allowing patients to report adverse events and side effects, and healthcare teams to collect valuable patient-reported outcome measures for treatment management. PROACT 2.0 supports text, audio, and video messaging, offering a secure, non-urgent communication channel that integrates with, or replaces, traditional methods. Its user-friendly and multilingual interface provides a new route for patient engagement and streamlines the handling of logistical information. Positive feedback from initial testing warrants future enhancements for broader applicability in cancer research and treatment.

Immunological characterization of a long-lasting response in a patient with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer treated with PD-1 and LAG-3 blockade

In patients with advanced triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), translational research efforts are needed to improve the clinical efficacy of immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors. Here, we report on the immunological characterization of an exceptional, long-lasting, tumor complete response in a patient with metastatic TNBC treated with dual PD-1 and LAG-3 blockade within the phase I/II study CLAG525X2101C (NCT02460224) The pre-treatment tumor biopsy revealed the presence of a CD3+ and CD8+ cell infiltrate, with few PD1+ cells, rare CD4+ cells, and an absence of both NK cells and LAG3 expression. Conversely, tumor cells exhibited positive staining for the three primary LAG-3 ligands (HLA-DR, FGL-1, and galectin-3), while being negative for PD-L1. In peripheral blood, baseline expression of LAG-3 and PD-1 was observed in circulating immune cells. Following treatment initiation, there was a rapid increase in proliferating granzyme-B+ NK and T cells, including CD4+ T cells, alongside a reduction in myeloid-derived suppressor cells. The role of LAG-3 expression on circulating NK cells, as well as the expression of LAG-3 ligands on tumor cells and the early modulation of circulating cytotoxic CD4+ T cells warrant further investigation as exploitable predictive biomarkers for dual PD-1 and LAG-3 blockade.Trial registration: NCT02460224. Registered 02/06/2015.

Molecular Tumor Board as a Clinical Tool for Converting Molecular Data Into Real-World Patient Care

PURPOSE

The investigation of multiple molecular targets with next-generation sequencing (NGS) has entered clinical practice in oncology, yielding to a paradigm shift from the histology-centric approach to the mutational model for personalized treatment. Accordingly, most of the drugs recently approved in oncology are coupled to specific biomarkers. One potential tool for implementing the mutational model of precision oncology in daily practice is represented by the Molecular Tumor Board (MTB), a multidisciplinary team whereby molecular pathologists, biologists, bioinformaticians, geneticists, medical oncologists, and pharmacists cooperate to generate, interpret, and match molecular data with personalized treatments.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Since May 2020, the institutional MTB set at Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori of Milan met weekly via teleconference to discuss molecular data and potential therapeutic options for patients with advanced/metastatic solid tumors.

RESULTS

Up to October 2021, among 1,996 patients evaluated, we identified >10,000 variants, 43.2% of which were functionally relevant (pathogenic or likely pathogenic). On the basis of functionally relevant variants, 711 patients (35.6%) were potentially eligible to targeted therapy according to European Society of Medical Oncology Scale for Clinical Actionability of Molecular Targets tiers, and 9.4% received a personalized treatment. Overall, larger NGS panels (containing >50 genes) significantly outperformed small panels (up to 50 genes) in detecting actionable gene targets across different tumor types.

CONCLUSION

Our real-world data provide evidence that MTB is a valuable tool for matching NGS data with targeted treatments, eventually implementing precision oncology in clinical practice.

Humoral and T-Cell Immune Response After 3 Doses of Messenger RNA Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Vaccines in Fragile Patients: The Italian VAX4FRAIL Study

BACKGROUND

Patients with solid or hematological tumors or neurological and immune-inflammatory disorders are potentially fragile subjects at increased risk of experiencing severe coronavirus disease 2019 and an inadequate response to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination.

METHODS

We designed a prospective Italian multicenter study to assess humoral and T-cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients (n = 378) with solid tumors (ST), hematological malignancies (HM), neurological disorders (ND), and immunorheumatological diseases (ID). A group of healthy controls was also included. We analyzed the immunogenicity of the primary vaccination schedule and booster dose.

RESULTS

The overall seroconversion rate in patients after 2 doses was 62.1%. Significantly lower rates were observed in HM (52.4%) and ID (51.9%) than in ST (95.6%) and ND (70.7%); a lower median antibody level was detected in HM and ID versus ST and ND (P < .0001). Similar rates of patients with a positive SARS-CoV-2 T-cell response were found in all disease groups, with a higher level observed in ND. The booster dose improved the humoral response in all disease groups, although to a lesser extent in HM patients, whereas the T-cell response increased similarly in all groups. In the multivariable logistic model, independent predictors of seroconversion were disease subgroup, treatment type, and age. Ongoing treatment known to affect the immune system was associated with the worst humoral response to vaccination (P < .0001) but had no effect on T-cell responses.

CONCLUSIONS

Immunosuppressive treatment more than disease type per se is a risk factor for a low humoral response after vaccination. The booster dose can improve both humoral and T-cell responses.

Abstract 1269: Negative ultra-selection of patients with RAS/BRAF wild-type (wt), microsatellite stable (MSS) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) receiving anti-EGFR-based therapy: The PRESSING2 study

Background: Several genomic alterations beyond RAS and BRAFV600E mutations have been preclinically validated as primary resistance drivers to EGFR inhibition in mCRC. We showed that our PRESSING panel (including PIK3CA exon 20/AKT1/PTEN mutations, ERBB2/MET amplification and ALK/ROS1/RET/NTRKs fusions) is useful to promote a new paradigm of negative hyper-selection, since patients with RAS/BRAF wt MSS mCRC and PRESSING alterations achieve significantly worse survival upon anti-EGFRs. With the aim of further refining molecular selection (negative ultra-selection), we investigated the clinical impact of candidate resistance alterations with even lower frequency (PRESSING2 panel) in a cohort of hyper-selected patients.

Methods: A prospective dataset was developed at 3 Italian Academic Hospitals and included 650 mCRC patients with comprehensive genomic profiling of FFPE tumor tissue by means of FoundationOne CDx. We selected those with RAS/BRAF wt, MSS and PRESSING negative treated with anti-EGFRs. Alterations of the PRESSING2 panel were selected based on their actionability and biological value, as follows: ALK, ROS1, NTRKs, ERBB2/3/4, NF1, ARAF, MAP2K1 pathogenic mutations, PTEN loss, KRAS and AKT1-2 amplification, FGFR2 amplification/fusions, EGFR fusions. PRESSING2 status was correlated with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

Results: 163 molecularly hyper-selected patients with PRESSING negative status were identified; 30 (18%) had PRESSING2 alterations, which were mutually exclusive in 26 (87%) samples. No significant differences in baseline clinical and pathological characteristics - including sidedness - were found in PRESSING2 positive vs negative patients. The median follow-up was 34.6 months (IQR 23.5-49.3). Patients with PRESSING2 positive status had significantly worse PFS and OS vs those with PRESSING2 negative disease (median PFS 7.0 and 13.0 months; HR 3.54, 95%CI 2.26-5.52, P&lt;0.001; median OS 24.5 and 51.2 months; HR 2.91, 95%CI 1.64-5.18, P&lt;0.001). In the multivariable model, the adjusted HRs were 3.40 for PFS and 2.71 for OS, respectively. 121 (74%) patients received an anti-EGFR agent upfront. In this first-line cohort, median PFS were 8.1 vs 13.2 months for PRESSING2 positive and negative subgroups (HR 3.24, 95%CI 1.89-5.57; P&lt;0.001; adjusted HR 2.96), whereas median OS were 26.2 vs 49.9 months, respectively (HR 2.28, 95%CI 1.15-4.54, P=0.018; adjusted HR 2.34).

Conclusions: In the era of comprehensive genomic profiling, several resistance alterations with extremely low prevalence may be detected, especially in CRCs that do not bear other genomic drivers. Negative ultra-selection may represent a relevant step forward in precision medicine in patients with RAS/BRAF wt MSS mCRC potentially eligible for EGFR blockade.

Citation Format: Giovanni Randon, Giulia Maddalena, Marco Maria Germani, Filippo Pagani, Francesca Bergamo, Mirella Giordano, Chiara Pircher, Caterina Sposetti, Luca Zambelli, Francesca Corti, Marta Bini, Alessandro Rametta, Andrea Spagnoletti, Aldo Montagna, Matteo Fassan, Alessandra Boccaccino, Guglielmo Vetere, Silvia Damian, Massimo Milione, Filippo de Braud, Chiara Cremolini, Sara Lonardi, Filippo Pietrantonio. Negative ultra-selection of patients with RAS/BRAF wild-type (wt), microsatellite stable (MSS) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) receiving anti-EGFR-based therapy: The PRESSING2 study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 1269.

Management of BRCA Tumour Testing in an Integrated Molecular Tumour Board Multidisciplinary Model

Tumour testing of the BRCA1/2 genes is routinely performed in patients with different cancer histological subtypes. To accurately identify patients with tumour-detected germline pathogenic variants (PVs) is a relevant issue currently under investigation. This study aims at evaluating the performance of the tumour-to-germline diagnostic flowchart model defined at our Institutional Molecular Tumour Board (MTB). Results from tumour BRCA sequencing of 641 consecutive unselected cancer patients were discussed during weekly MTB meetings with the early involvement of clinical geneticists for appropriate referral to genetic counselling. The overall tumour detection rate of BRCA1/2 PVs was 8.7% (56/641), ranging from 24.4% (31/127) in high-grade ovarian cancer to 3.9% (12/304) in tumours not associated with germline BRCA1/2 PVs. Thirty-seven patients with PVs (66%) were evaluated by a clinical geneticist, and in 24 of them (64.9%), germline testing confirmed the presence of the PV in blood. Nine of these patients (37.5%) were not eligible for germline testing according to the criteria in use at our institution. Cascade testing was subsequently performed on 18 relatives. The tumour-to-germline diagnostic pipeline, developed in the framework of our institutional MTB, compared with guideline-based germline testing following genetic counselling, proved to be effective in identifying a higher number of germline BRCA PVs carriers.

Efficacy of mRNA anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and dynamics of humoral immune response in patients with solid tumors: results from the institutional registry of an Italian tertiary cancer center

Background:

Systemic immunosuppression characterizing cancer patients represents a concern regarding the efficacy of anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination, and real-world evidence is needed to define the efficacy and the dynamics of humoral immune response to mRNA-based anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines.

Methods:

We conducted an observational study that included patients with solid tumors who were candidates for mRNA anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination at the Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy. The primary objective was to monitor the immunologic response to the mRNA anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in terms of anti-spike antibody levels. All the patients received two doses of the mRNA-1273 vaccine or the BNT162b2 vaccine. Healthcare workers served as a control group of healthy subjects.

Results:

Among the 243 patients included in the present analysis, 208 (85.60%) and 238 (97.94%) resulted seroconverted after the first and the second dose of vaccine, respectively. Only five patients (2.06%) had a negative titer after the second dose. No significant differences in the rate of seroconversion after two vaccine doses were observed in patients as compared with the control group of healthy subjects. Age and anticancer treatment class had an independent impact on the antibody titer after the second dose of vaccination. In a subgroup of 171 patients with available data about the third timepoint, patients receiving immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors seem to have a higher peak of antibodies soon after the second dose (3 weeks after), but a more pronounced decrease at a late timepoint (3 months after).

Conclusions:

The systemic immunosuppression characterizing cancer patients did not seem to dramatically affect the humoral response to anti-SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines in our population of patients with solid tumors. Further investigation is needed to dissect the interplay between immunotherapy and longitudinal dynamics of humoral response to mRNA vaccines, as well as to analyze the cellular response to mRNA vaccines in cancer patients.

Targeted RNA-sequencing analysis for fusion transcripts detection in tumor diagnostics: assessment of bioinformatic tools reliability in FFPE samples

Aim:

Diagnostic laboratories are progressively introducing next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies in the routine workflow to meet the increasing clinical need for comprehensive molecular characterization in cancer patients for diagnosis and precision medicine, including fusion-transcripts detection. Nevertheless, the low quality of messenger RNA (mRNA) extracted from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples may affect the transition from traditional single-gene testing approaches [like fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), immunohistochemistry (IHC), or polymerase chain reaction (PCR)] to NGS. The present study is aimed at assessing the overall accuracy of RNA fusion transcripts detection by NGS analysis in FFPE samples in real-world diagnostics.

Methods:

Herein, NGS data from 190 soft tissue tumors (STTs) and carcinoma cases, discussed in the context of the institutional Molecular Tumor Board, are reported and analyzed by FusionPlex^© Solid tumor kit through the manufacturer’s pipeline and by two well-known fast and accurate open-source tools [Arriba (ARR) and spliced transcripts alignment to reference (STAR)-fusion (SFU)].

Results:

The combination of FusionPlex^© Solid tumor with ArcherDX^® Analysis suite (ADx) analysis package has been proven to be sensitive and specific in STT samples, while partial loss of sensitivity has been found in carcinoma specimens.

Conclusions:

Albeit ARR and SFU showed lower sensitivity, the use of additional fusion-detection tools can contribute to reinforcing or extending the output obtained by ADx, particularly in the case of low-quality input data. Overall, our results sustain the clinical use of NGS for the detection of fusion transcripts in FFPE material.

Nomogram to predict the outcomes of patients with microsatellite instability-high metastatic colorectal cancer receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with microsatellite instability (MSI)-high metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is unprecedented. A relevant proportion of subjects achieving durable disease control may be considered potentially 'cured', as opposed to patients experiencing primary ICI refractoriness or short-term clinical benefit. We developed and externally validated a nomogram to estimate the progression-free survival (PFS) and the time-independent event-free probability (EFP) in patients with MSI-high mCRC receiving ICIs.

METHODS

The PFS and EFP were estimated using a cure model fitted on a developing set of 163 patients and validated on a set of 146 patients with MSI-high mCRC receiving anti-programmed death (ligand)1 (PD-(L)1) ± anticytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) agents. A total of 23 putative prognostic factors were chosen and then selected using a random survival forest (RSF). The model performance in estimating PFS probability was evaluated by assessing calibration (internally-developing set and externally-validating set) and quantifying the discriminative ability (Harrell C index).

RESULTS

RFS selected five variables: ICI type (anti-PD-(L)1 monotherapy vs anti-CTLA-4 combo), ECOG PS (0 vs >0), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (≤3 vs >3), platelet count, and prior treatment lines. As both in the developing and validation series most PFS events occurred within 12 months, this was chosen as cut-point for PFS prediction. The combination of the selected variables allowed estimation of the 12-month PFS (focused on patients with low chance of being cured) and the EFP (focused on patients likely to be event-free at a certain point of their follow-up). ICI type was significantly associated with disease control, as patients receiving the anti-CTLA-4-combination experienced the best outcomes. The calibration of PFS predictions was good both in the developing and validating sets. The median value of the EFP (46%) allowed segregation of two prognostic groups in both the developing (PFS HR=3.73, 95% CI 2.25 to 6.18; p<0.0001) and validating (PFS HR=1.86, 95% CI 1.07 to 3.23; p=0.0269) sets.

CONCLUSIONS

A nomogram based on five easily assessable variables including ICI treatment was built to estimate the outcomes of patients with MSI-high mCRC, with the potential to assist clinicians in their clinical practice. The web-based system 'MSI mCRC Cure' was released.

Safety, Efficacy, and Pharmacodynamics of Tremelimumab Plus Durvalumab for Patients With Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Randomized Expansion of a Phase I/II Study

This phase I/II study evaluated tremelimumab (anticytotoxic T-lymphocyte–associated antigen-4 monoclonal antibody) and durvalumab (antiprogrammed death ligand-1 monoclonal antibody) as monotherapies and in combination for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), including a novel regimen featuring a single, priming dose of tremelimumab (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02519348).

Single Institution trial of anthracycline- and taxane-based chemotherapy for operable breast cancer: The ASTER study

The efficacy of anthracycline- and taxane-based chemotherapy for perioperative treatment of breast cancer (BC) has been established. No superiority of a cytotoxic regimen has been demonstrated, provided that administration of an anthracycline and a taxane is warranted. The ASTER study was designed to investigate the safety of 6 months of perioperative chemotherapy with Doxorubicin and Paclitaxel, followed by Cyclophosphamide, Methotrexate, and 5-Fluorouracil. ASTER enrolled patients with cT2-3 N0-1 or pT1-2 N1-3 BC, from November 2008 to August 2011. Treatment consisted of Doxorubicin 60 mg/sm, Paclitaxel 200 mg/sm q21 (AT) for three cycles followed by Cyclophosphamide 600 mg/sm, Methotrexate 40 mg/sm, 5-Fluorouracil 600 mg/sm d1,8 q28 (CMF) for three cycles, in either neo-adjuvant or adjuvant setting. All HER-positive patients received targeted therapy with Trastuzumab for 1 year. Disease-free and overall survival (DFS and OS, respectively) were estimated according to Kaplan-Meier method. Three hundred and thirty patients were enrolled, where 77.9% of cases were treated in an adjuvant setting; 65.5% received breast conservative surgery, 72.4% axillary dissection. 75.5% of cases presented estrogen receptor positivity, 66.7% progesterone receptor positivity; 18.5% of patients presented HER2-positive BC, 16.1% triple negative disease. Twenty-eight (8.5%) developed grade III-IV hematologic toxicity; nine patients (2.7%) developed grade III neurological toxicity. Loco-regional DFS was 99.6% at 1 year, 97.1% at 5 years, 95.9% at 7 years. Corresponding distant DFS was 98.4%, 90.2%, and 88.8%. One, 5, and 7-year OS was 99.6%, 94.9%, and 91.2%, respectively. Chemotherapy with ATx3→CMFx3 is confirmed safe and effective at 6.7 years follow-up. These results appear comparable to those reported in regulatory trials of most commonly prescribed anthracycline and taxane-based regimens.

A phase Ib study of pictilisib (GDC-0941) in combination with paclitaxel, with and without bevacizumab or trastuzumab, and with letrozole in advanced breast cancer

BACKGROUND

This phase Ib study (NCT00960960) evaluated pictilisib (GDC-0941; pan-phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitor) plus paclitaxel, with and without bevacizumab or trastuzumab, or in combination with letrozole, in patients with locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer.

METHODS

This was a three-part multischedule study. Patients in parts 1 and 2, which comprised 3 + 3 dose escalation and cohort expansion stages, received pictilisib (60-330 mg) plus paclitaxel (90 mg/m2) with and without bevacizumab (10 mg/kg) or trastuzumab (2-4 mg/kg). In part 3, patients received pictilisib (260 mg) plus letrozole (2.5 mg). Primary objectives were evaluation of safety and tolerability, identification of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of pictilisib, and recommendation of a phase II dosing regimen. Secondary endpoints included pharmacokinetics and preliminary antitumor activity.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine patients were enrolled; all experienced at least one adverse event (AE). Grade ≥ 3 AEs, serious AEs, and AEs leading to death were reported in 50 (72.5%), 21 (30.4%), and 2 (2.9%) patients, respectively. Six (8.7%) patients reported a DLT, and the MTD and recommended phase II pictilisib doses were established where possible. There was no pictilisib-paclitaxel drug-drug interaction. Two (3.4%) patients experienced complete responses, and 17 (29.3%) patients had partial responses.

CONCLUSIONS

Combining pictilisib with paclitaxel, with and without bevacizumab or trastuzumab, or letrozole, had a manageable safety profile in patients with locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer. The combination had antitumor activity, and the additive effect of pictilisib supported further investigation in a randomized study.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00960960 . Registered on August 13, 2009.

Safety and Antitumor Activity of the Multitargeted Pan-TRK, ROS1, and ALK Inhibitor Entrectinib: Combined Results from Two Phase I Trials (ALKA-372-001 and STARTRK-1)

Entrectinib, a potent oral inhibitor of the tyrosine kinases TRKA/B/C, ROS1, and ALK, was evaluated in two phase I studies in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors, including patients with active central nervous system (CNS) disease. Here, we summarize the overall safety and report the antitumor activity of entrectinib in a cohort of patients with tumors harboring NTRK1/2/3, ROS1, or ALK gene fusions, naïve to prior TKI treatment targeting the specific gene, and who were treated at doses that achieved therapeutic exposures consistent with the recommended phase II dose. Entrectinib was well tolerated, with predominantly Grades 1/2 adverse events that were reversible with dose modification. Responses were observed in non-small cell lung cancer, colorectal cancer, mammary analogue secretory carcinoma, melanoma, and renal cell carcinoma, as early as 4 weeks after starting treatment and lasting as long as >2 years. Notably, a complete CNS response was achieved in a patient with SQSTM1-NTRK1-rearranged lung cancer.Significance: Gene fusions of NTRK1/2/3, ROS1, and ALK (encoding TRKA/B/C, ROS1, and ALK, respectively) lead to constitutive activation of oncogenic pathways. Entrectinib was shown to be well tolerated and active against those gene fusions in solid tumors, including in patients with primary or secondary CNS disease. Cancer Discov; 7(4); 400-9. ©2017 AACR.This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 339.

Drain tip cultures do not predict infections in primary total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The possibility to predict surgical site infections development could be of high prognostic value. We aimed to investigate whether cultures obtained from the tip of the closed passive wound drain may provide early signs of progression towards periprosthetic joint infections.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed an observational study on consecutive primary total knee arthroplasties performed in our department over 4 years by two high volume surgeons (it means they do a lot of arthroplasties/year; it is orthopedics specific). A total of 284 knees in 257 patients were included. Follow up was available for an average of 18.7 months. There were no simultaneous procedures.

RESULTS

Nineteen (6.69%) drain tips yielded positive cultures, for a mean duration, from surgery to sample collection, of 1.63 (0.5) days. None of the positive drain tip cultures developed clinical signs of infection and all knees were healed at discharge after a mean of 13.78 days (SD= 3.34; range= 8-18). None of the 7 (2.46%) cases who developed deep infections had positive drain tip cultures. A true positive value of 0 led to a positive predictive value of 0, a negative predictive value of 97.34%, sensitivity of 0% and specificity of 93.14.

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnostic use of passive drain tip cultures to detect early infections after total knee replacement is therefore absolutely useless.

The anxiolitic effects of BTG1640 and BTG1675A on ultrasonic isolation calls and locomotor activity of rat pups

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the anxiolytic properties of the new isoxazoline compounds BTG1640 and BTG1675A in comparison with diazepam.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We evaluated the ultrasonic distress emission in both sexes of neonatal rat pups (which seems to be a sensitive indicator of the rat emotional reactivity and represents a valuable tool to screen compounds with expected anxiolytic properties) and the locomotor activity in 30-day old rat pups.

RESULTS

We found a significant reduction in the number of emitted ultrasonic calls only after i.p. administration of diazepam 1 mg/kg, while no significant reduction have been detected after i.p. administration of BTG 1640 and BTG 1675A. Furthermore, we found a significant reduction of locomotor activity in the first 10' of the test, only in the group treated with diazepam 0.1 mg.

CONCLUSIONS

The tests validating the supposed anxiolytic properties of the new isoxazoline compounds BTG1640 and BTG1675A, in comparison with diazepam, gave negative results.

A phase I pharmacokinetic and safety study of cabazitaxel in adult cancer patients with normal and impaired renal function

PURPOSE

Limited data are available on cabazitaxel pharmacokinetics in patients with renal impairment. This open-label, multicenter study assessed cabazitaxel in patients with advanced solid tumors and normal or impaired renal function.

METHODS

Cohorts A (normal renal function: creatinine clearance [CrCL] >80 mL/min/1.73 m²), B (moderate renal impairment: CrCL 30 to <50 mL/min/1.73 m²) and C (severe impairment: CrCL <30 mL/min/1.73 m²) received cabazitaxel 25 mg/m² (A, B) or 20 mg/m² (C, could be escalated to 25 mg/m²), once every 3 weeks. Pharmacokinetic parameters and cabazitaxel unbound fraction (F _U) were assessed using linear regression and mixed models. Geometric mean (GM) and GM ratios (GMRs) were determined using mean CrCL intervals (moderate and severe renal impairment: 40 and 15 mL/min/1.73 m²) versus a control (90 mL/min/1.73 m²).

RESULTS

Overall, 25 patients received cabazitaxel (median cycles: 3 [range 1-20]; Cohort A: 5 [2-13]; Cohort B: 3 [1-15]; and Cohort C: 5 [1-20]), of which 24 were eligible for pharmacokinetic analysis (eight in each cohort). For moderate and severe renal impairment versus normal renal function, GMR estimates were: clearance normalized to body surface area (CL/BSA) 0.95 (90% CI 0.80-1.13) and 0.89 (0.61-1.32); area under the curve normalized to dose (AUC/dose) 1.06 (0.88-1.27) and 1.14 (0.76-1.71); and F _U 0.99 (0.94-1.04) and 0.97 (0.87-1.09), respectively. Estimated slopes of linear regression of log parameters versus log CrCL (renal impairment) were: CL/BSA 0.06 (-0.15 to 0.28); AUC/dose -0.07 (-0.30 to 0.16); and F _U 0.02 (-0.05 to 0.08). Cabazitaxel safety profile was consistent with previous reports.

CONCLUSIONS

Renal impairment had no clinically meaningful effect on cabazitaxel pharmacokinetics.

Abstract LB-A08: ALK and ROS-1 status: A retrospective analysis in solid tumors

Background: Tyrosine kinase receptors are important regulators of cellular signal transduction pathways that play a crucial role in development of cancer. Among them, Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK) and C-Ros Oncogene-1 (ROS-1) are activated by rearrangement in several tumors. Tailored therapies have been developed according to the status of ALK and ROS-1, successfully used in NSCLC and potentially useful in other solid tumors harboring ALK and ROS-1 aberrations.

Material and methods: ALK and ROS-1 status was evaluated in 666 and 441 patients with solid tumors, respectively, since 2014 at the Pathology Department. ALK and ROS-1 rearrangement and gene copy number variation (CNV) were assayed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Gene copy number gain was defined by 3 to 5 fusion signals on average in ≥10% of cells, with amplification being highlighted by the clusters or 10 to 15 fusion signals in 10% or more tumor cells.

Results: ALK status was assessed in 650/666 (97%) cases, while ROS-1 status was evaluable in 426/441 (96%). We identified 15/650 (2.3%) cases with ALK rearrangment, including 13 lung adenocarcinomas (4.1%), 1 colon cancer (0.5%) and 1 myoepithelioma (0.5%). CNV for ALK was documented in 53% lung adenocarcinoma, 50% pancreatic, 41% biliary and 37% colon carcinoma patients. We found 7/426 (1.6%) tumors with ROS-1 rearrangement, corresponding to 5 lung (2.7%) and 2 colon (1.3%) adenocarcinomas. CNV for ROS-1 was more frequent in melanoma (77%), neuroendocrine tumors (39%) and NSCLC (32%, 3/4 cases of ROS-1 amplification were squamous carcinoma). Eight out of the 22 rearranged cases (5 ALK and 3 ROS-1) were tested for both genes: these aberrations were mutually exclusive. Three out of 5 (60%) ALK rearranged tumors showed ROS-1 deletion. No ALK and ROS-1 alterations were documented in 30 pancreatic, 25 H&N, 22 biliary tract, 13 renal, and 13 breast carcinomas, as well as in 13 melanomas and 36 other solid tumors.

Conclusions: ALK and ROS-1 rearrangement was found in 4.1% and 2.7% of NSCLC, respectively, in keeping with literature data. In other solid tumors, the percentage of rearrangements is exceedingly low, but melanoma, neuroendocrine tumors, pancreatic and colon cancer may show significant CNV. We speculate that such aberrations of ALK and ROS-1 could act as potential therapy targets, but additional investigation by immunohistochemistry and next generation sequencing is clinically warranted.

Citation Format: Maria Silvia Cona, matteo Duca, Adele Testi, Sara Cresta, Katia Fiorella Dotti, Alice Indini, Diego Signorelli, Giuseppe Pelosi, Filippo Guglielmo de Braud, Silvia Damian. ALK and ROS-1 status: A retrospective analysis in solid tumors. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference: Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2015 Nov 5-9; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2015;14(12 Suppl 2):Abstract nr LB-A08.

Abstract P3-12-13: First analysis of ASTER study AT for 3 cycles followed by CMF for 3 cycles as neo or adjuvant chemotherapy in early stage breast cancer. A single institution experience

Background: The ECTO study demonstrated the efficacy of concurrent doxorubicin and paclitaxel (AT) for 4 cycles followed by cyclophosphamyde/ methotrexate/fluorouracil (CMF) for 4 cycles in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment of operable breast cancer (Gianni L. et al. JCO 2009). With the purpose of ameliorating the tolerability of the regimen, we designed the ASTER study to reduce both the duration and the total dose of treatment with AT followed by CMF. Herein we report on the first data of efficacy of the study and the toxicity.

Methods: A total of 345 patients with operable breast cancer were enrolled between September 2008 and November 2011. Median age was 50 years (range 23-74); 74.5% of patients presented with hormonal receptor positive (HR +) and 23,5% of patients with both hormonal receptor negative (HR-PgR-); 19% of patients presented HER2 over expression/amplification; half patients had Ki67 &gt;14%, almost of patients had pT1 (66%) or pT2 (30%) with 27,5% of pN0. Patients were treated with Adriamycin (60 mg/mq) + Paclitaxel (200 mg/mq) q21 for 3 cycles followed by CMF i.v. 1, 8q28 for 3 cycles (73 as neo-adjuvant and 272 as adjuvant regimen). After chemotherapy in patients with HER2+ trastuzumab was delivered for 1 yr and in patients with HR+ tumors hormonal treatment was recommended for 5 yr. Breast irradiation was mandatory after conserving surgery (64% of cases).

Results: At a median follow-up of 36 months, the relapse free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were 92% and 96% respectively. As expected in patients HR+/HER2- RFS were 95% and OS 99%, in patients HER2+ RFS were 90% and OS 97% and in those HR-/HER2- 83% and 79% respectively.

In the neoadjuvant subset tnpCR, defined as the absence of invasive cells in the primary tumor and in nodes, was obtained in 10% of cases. A tnpCR was achieved in 27% of patients with triple negative cancer and only in 5% of HR positive cancer.

Peripheral neuropathy toxicity was reported in 37% of cases and was essentially mild to moderate. Only 8,7% of patients experienced neutropenia G 3, 4,3% GI toxicity G3 and 2,3% mucositis G3. No cardiotoxicity was documented even in the 65 patients who received postoperative trastuzumab to date.

Conclusions: This results of Aster study AT for 3 cycles followed by CMF for 3 cycles showed similar efficacy and very favorable toxicity compared whit our previous experience of eighth cycle of sequential and non cross resistant chemotherapy in early stage breast cancer.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P3-12-13.

Is a dexamethasone-sparing strategy capable of preventing acute and delayed emesis caused by combined doxorubicin and paclitaxel for breast cancer? Analysis of a phase II trial

OBJECTIVE

The effectiveness of palonosetron without delayed dexamethasone dosing against emesis was investigated in patients scheduled to receive the corticosteroid-containing combination of doxorubicin and paclitaxel (AT) for 3 cycles.

METHODS

Chemo-naïve women with breast cancer receiving doxorubicin (60 mg/m(2)) and paclitaxel (200 mg/m(2)) were eligible. Patients received palonosetron 0.25 mg intravenously before chemotherapy, however, all patients also received a premedication consisting of prednisone (25 mg orally the evening before therapy) and hydrocortisone (250 mg intravenously just before paclitaxel). The primary end point was complete control (CC; no vomiting, no rescue anti-emetics, and no more than mild nausea) during the overall phase (days 1-5) following cycle 1.

RESULTS

Seventy-six patients were enrolled and evaluable (median age 50 years). Fifty-six patients (74%; 95% CI 62-83%) achieved overall CC. Acute (day 1) and delayed (days 2-5) CC rates were 78 and 74%, respectively. No vomiting rates for the acute, delayed and overall phases were 85, 85 and 83%, respectively. An exploratory analysis showed only a small decrease in the probability of achieving CC between cycle 1 (74%) and cycle 3 (66%).

CONCLUSION

The dexamethasone-sparing strategy prevented emesis in more than 70% of breast cancer patients receiving their initial cycle of AT chemotherapy.

Hepatic trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE) in metastatic breast cancer

e12017

Background: Liver metastasis is one of the most frequent cause of death in breast cancer patients. Among loco-regional approaches available for solid tumor liver metastasis, TACE allows a prolonged intra-lesion exposure to chemotherapeutic agents. Initial studies have highlighted a benefit in terms of response rate (RR) and overall survival (OS) in breast cancer patients treated with TACE versus systemic chemotherapy. Methods: We have retrospectively evaluated 14 patients affected by breast cancer with liver metastasis. Patients had been selected for liver TACE according to the presence of liver metastasis as only site of disease, or in the event of further sites of metastasis that were stable or in response from the previous treatment. All the patients received one or more TACE with DC-Bead (Biocompatibles UK) 100-300 micron, loaded with a chemotherapeutic agent (doxorubicin, paclitaxel).The systemic therapy received by patients before TACE could be confirmed or changed according to disease response. Objective of the study was to evaluate the response rate to TACE and its correlation with the response to the very last treatment performed before it. As surrogate of efficacy, time to progression (TTP) and OS were analyzed. Results: Among the 14 treated patients (5 heavily pretreated, with more than three lines of chemotherapy) only one obtained a complete remission (RC). Four patients presented a partial remission (PR). Three of them were progressing from previous treatment and one had a PR. Stable disease (SD) after TACE was obtained in four cases: two of them had a progressive disease (PD) before TACE and two had a responsive disease. Five patients did not respond to TACE (one with PR from the previous line of therapy). Median TTP observed in responsive patients (CR + PR) was 4.5 times higher than non-responders (PD) (13.2 vs. 2.9 months). Patients with SD had a median TTP of 4.3 months. Median OS of responsive patients was 25.6 months vs. 17.5 and 19.2 months of patients with SD or PD respectively. Conclusions: In our experience, chemoembolization can represent a valid therapeutic option in breast cancer patients with liver metastasis, independently from the response to the previous systemic therapy, and may prolong survival.

A phase I study of ombrabulin (O) combined with bevacizumab (B) in patients with advanced solid tumors

2535

Background: O, a vascular-disrupting agent derived from combretastatin A4-phosphate, induces rapid tumor vascular shutdown via endothelial cell damage. Resistance to O may occur by surges in circulating endothelial progenitors (CEP) that repopulate the tumor vasculature. Experimental models suggest prolonged and synergistic antitumor activity when O is combined with VEGF-blockade, with reduction in CEP surge. This phase I study was performed to determine the maximum tolerated dose, safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD) and preliminary antitumor activity of O combined with B. Methods: Patients (pts) with advanced treatment-refractory solid tumors, ECOG PS ≤1, and adequate organ function were eligible. O (mg/m²) was administered intravenously (IV) on day (d)1 with B (mg/kg) IV on d2 in 21d cycles (C). A Bayesian model informed dose escalation steps. PK sampling, dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (DCE-US) for tumor perfusion, and CEP samples were collected. Results: 39 pts (M:F 10:29; median age 51 years [range 25-75]) were treated at 12 dose levels combining O [8 to 50mg/m2] with B [5, 10, or 15mg/kg]. Ovary (16/39, 41%) and colon (4/39, 10%) were the most common primary sites. No C1 dose-limiting toxicities occurred in 37 evaluable pts. Drug-related grade 3-4 treatment emergent adverse events (AE) were hypertension (6/39, 15%), intestinal perforation (2/39, 5%), headache (1/39, 3%), myocardial infarction (1/39, 3%), and pulmonary embolism (1/39, 3%). 36 pts (14 ovarian) were evaluable for response by RECIST 1.1. Antitumor activity was observed at O 20mg/m2+ B 10mg/kg and above, with confirmed partial responses in 2/14 pts with ovarian primary (14%), CA125 responses in 2 further ovary/endometrial cancers lasting ≥ 6 months, and stable disease in 15/36 pts (42%) lasting ≥ 6 months in 3 pts. PK indicated no interactions of O+B. Analyses of CEP levels post O and paired DCE-US data are ongoing. Conclusions: The maximum administered dose (MAD) was O 50mg/m2 with B 15mg/kg, with no dose-limiting toxicities and vascular toxicity that was manageable. Promising antitumor activity was observed at doses below the MAD and warrants further evaluation. Clinical trial information: NCT01193595.

A phase I study of ombrabulin (O) combined with bevacizumab (B) in patients with advanced solid tumors (NCT01193595)

3080

Background: O is a vascular-disrupting agent derived from combretastatin A4-phosphate that induces rapid but transient tumor vascular shutdown. In experimental models, the combination of O with VEGF-blockade induced more regressions than O alone. This phase I study was performed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and assess the overall safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD) and preliminary antitumor activity of O plus B. Trial is funded by sanofi. Methods: Patients (pt) with advanced solid tumors, ECOG PS ≤1, and adequate organ function were eligible. Increasing doses of O (mg/m²) was administered intravenously (IV) on day (d) 1; B (5 or 10mg/kg) was administered IV on d2, in 21d cycles (C). A Bayesian design was applied to determine dose escalation steps and MTD. PK sampling was performed in C1 and C2. PD sampling for circulating endothelial cells (CEC) and progenitors (CEP) were performed throughout. Dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (DCE-US) to assess tumor perfusion was performed before and after C1 and C2 dosing. Results: 25 pts (M:F 6:19; median age 49 years [range 27-75]) have been treated at 8 dose levels of O/B: 8/5 (3), 11.5/5 (4), 11.5/10 (3), 15.5/10 (3), 20/10 (3), 25/10 (3); 35/10 (3) and 42/10 (3). Ovarian cancer was the most frequent tumor type (n=11). Median Cs received was 3 (1 to 14). No DLTs were observed during C1. Drug-related grade (g) 3-4 adverse events (AE) included hypertension in 2 pts (8/5; 11.5/5) and ileal perforation in 1 pt with peritoneal carcinomatosis at laparotomy (11.5/10). A case of duodenal perforation was unlikely related (25/10). Two pts with ovarian cancer (11.5/5; 20/10) had confirmed partial responses (4.4 months (mo) and 7+ mo). 13/23 (57%) pts with ≥ 1 tumor assessment had stable disease (n=8; median 4.3 mo [1.8-9.5]; 5 ongoing). Data from cohorts 1 and 2 demonstrated no evidence of a PK interaction.17/25 patients demonstrated a peak in CEC, and 7/9 patients a peak in CEP. 4/7 DCE-US evaluable pts had >50% drop in tumor perfusion (AUC) at Day 8 of C1. Conclusions: O combined with B is well tolerated with early evidence of clinical activity. The MTD has not been reached (current dose level 50/10); cohorts of O combined with B at 15 mg/kg will be tested.

Sensitization to doxorubicin resistance in breast cancer cell lines by tamoxifen and megestrol acetate

Acquired drug resistance is a major factor in the failure of doxorubicin-based chemotherapy in breast cancer. We determined the ability of megestrol acetate and/or tamoxifen to reverse doxorubicin drug resistance in a doxorubicin-resistant breast cancer line (the human MCF-7/ADR). The cytotoxicity of doxorubicin, megestrol acetate, and/or tamoxifen was determined in the sensitive and resistant cell lines utilizing the sulphorhodamine B assay. Tamoxifen alone produced an IC50 (concentration resulting in 50% inhibition of control growth) of 10.6 microM, whereas megestrol acetate alone resulted in an IC50 of 48.7 microM in the MCF-7/ADR cell line. The IC50 of doxorubicin in MCF-7/ADR was 1.9 microM. Neither megestrol acetate alone nor tamoxifen alone at 1 or 5 microM altered the IC50 of doxorubicin. However, the combination of tamoxifen (1 or 5 microM) and megestrol acetate (1 or 5 microM) synergistically sensitized MCF-7/ADR cells. Additionally, megestrol acetate and tamoxifen inhibited iodoarylazidoprazosin binding to P-glycoprotein, and, in their presence, there was an increased doxorubicin accumulation in the MCF-7/ADR cells. Furthermore, the combination of tamoxifen and megestrol acetate had much less effect on the cytotoxicity of doxorubicin in MCF-7 wild-type cells. Clinically achievable concentrations of tamoxifen and megestrol acetate can largely sensitize MCF-7/ADR to doxorubicin. The combination of these three drugs in a clinical trial may be informative.