MBD4 deficiency is predictive of response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic uveal melanoma patients

Genetics, genomics and clinical features of adenomatous polyposis

Adenomatous polyposis syndromes are hereditary conditions characterised by the development of multiple adenomas in the gastrointestinal tract, particularly in the colon and rectum, significantly increasing the risk of colorectal cancer and, in some cases, extra-colonic malignancies. These syndromes are caused by germline pathogenic variants (PVs) in genes involved in Wnt signalling and DNA repair. The main autosomal dominant adenomatous polyposis syndromes include familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) and polymerase proofreading-associated polyposis (PPAP), caused by germline PVs in APC and the POLE and POLD1 genes, respectively. Autosomal recessive syndromes include those caused by biallelic PVs in the DNA mismatch repair genes MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2, MSH3 and probably MLH3, and in the base excision repair genes MUTYH, NTHL1 and MBD4. This review provides an in-depth discussion of the genetic and molecular mechanisms underlying hereditary adenomatous polyposis syndromes, their clinical presentations, tumour mutational signatures, and emerging approaches for the treatment of the associated cancers. Considerations for genetic testing are described, including post-zygotic mosaicism, non-coding PVs, the interpretation of variants of unknown significance and cancer risks associated with monoallelic variants in the recessive genes. Despite advances in genetic testing and the recent identification of new adenomatous polyposis genes, many cases of multiple adenomas remain genetically unexplained. Non-genetic factors, including environmental risk factors, prior oncologic treatments, and bacterial genotoxins colonising the intestine - particularly colibactin-producing Escherichia coli - have emerged as alternative pathogenic mechanisms.

Pathogenic Germline Variants in Uveal Melanoma Driver and BAP1-Associated Genes in Finnish Patients with Uveal Melanoma

Uveal melanoma (UM) is a rare yet aggressive eye cancer causing over 50% mortality from metastasis. Familial UM, amounting to 1%-6% of patients in Finland and the United States, mostly lack identified genetic cause, while 8% show associations with other cancer syndromes. We searched novel genetic associations for predisposition to UM, additional to already studied BAP1 and MBD4, by using targeted amplicon sequencing of 19 genes associated with UM, BAP1, or renal cell carcinoma in 270 consecutively enrolled Finnish patients with UM. Key UM drivers GNAQ, GNA11, CYSLTR2, PLCB4, EIF1AX, and SF3B1 lacked pathogenic germline variants. One patient carried the pathogenic BRCA1 variant c.3626del p.(Leu1209*), and one harbored a novel truncating MET variant c.252C > G p.(Tyr84*), classified as likely pathogenic. FLCN and BRCA2, previously identified with pathogenic variants in patients with UM, did not have such variants in our cohort. Two patients were heterozygous for a pathogenic recessive BLM variant c.2824-2A > T. None of the carriers of identified variants had familial UM. We identified BRCA1 and MET as genes with pathogenic germline variants in Finnish UM patients, each with a frequency of 0.4% (95% confidence interval, 0-2).

Characterization of somatic mutations in sporadic uveal melanoma and uveal melanoma in patients with germline BAP1 pathogenic variants

Genetic analyses were conducted on tumor samples from 88 patients with uveal melanoma (UM), 6 of whom carry pathogenic germline variants in BAP1. We assessed the frequency, pattern, and prognostic significance of somatic aberrations, and investigated differences between germline BAP1 variant carriers compared to sporadic cases. The frequency of the main oncogenic driver mutations was not significantly different between these groups. Patients with germline BAP1 variants did not have significantly different overall survival compared to the wildtype or somatic BAP1 mutation groups. Patients with a somatic BAP1 mutation (n = 24) had a significantly worse prognosis compared to wildtype (n = 58). All patients with stage III tumors and a somatic BAP1 mutation (n = 7) developed metastasis, however four of 28 stage I-II tumors without metastasis had somatic BAP1 mutations, with observation time >5 years. The tumor from one germline BAP1 carrier (stage IIIC) with a somatic EIF1AX splice variant, has not developed metastasis within a 22-year observation time.

Emerging therapeutic strategies for metastatic uveal melanoma: Targeting driver mutations

Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common primary malignant intraocular tumor in adults. Although primary UM can be effectively controlled, a significant proportion of cases (40% or more) eventually develop distant metastases, commonly in the liver. Metastatic UM remains a lethal disease with limited treatment options. The initiation of UM is typically attributed to activating mutations in GNAQ or GNA11. The elucidation of the downstream pathways such as PKC/MAPK, PI3K/AKT/mTOR, and Hippo-YAP have provided potential therapeutic targets. Concurrent mutations in BRCA1 associated protein 1 (BAP1) or splicing factor 3b subunit 1 (SF3B1) are considered crucial for the acquisition of malignant potential. Furthermore, in preclinical studies, actionable targets associated with BAP1 loss or oncogenic mutant SF3B1 have been identified, offering promising avenues for UM treatment. This review aims to summarize the emerging targeted and epigenetic therapeutic strategies for metastatic UM carrying specific driver mutations and the potential of combining these approaches with immunotherapy, with particular focus on those in upcoming or ongoing clinical trials.

Familial uveal melanoma and other tumors in 25 families with monoallelic germline MBD4 variants

BACKGROUND

Monoallelic germline MBD4 pathogenic variants were recently reported to cause a predisposition to uveal melanoma, associated with a specific tumor mutational signature and good response to immunotherapy. Monoallelic tumor pathogenic variants have also been described in brain tumors, breast cancers, and myxofibrosarcomas, whereas biallelic germline MBD4 pathogenic variants have been involved in a recessive hereditary adenomatous polyposis and a specific type of acute myeloid leukemia.

METHODS

We analyzed MBD4 for all patients with a diagnosis of uveal melanoma at Institut Curie since July 2021 and in the 3240 consecutive female probands explored at the Institut Curie for suspicion of predisposition to breast cancer between July 2021 and February 2023.

RESULTS

We describe 25 families whose probands carry a monoallelic germline pathogenic variant in MBD4. Eighteen of these families presented with uveal melanoma (including a case patient with multiple uveal melanoma), and 7 families presented with breast cancer. Family histories showed the first familial case of uveal melanoma in monoallelic MBD4 pathogenic variant carriers and other various types of cancers in relatives, especially breast, renal, and colorectal tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

Monoallelic MBD4 pathogenic variant may explain some cases of familial and multiple uveal melanoma as well as various cancer types, expanding the tumor spectrum of this predisposition. Further genetic testing in relatives combined with molecular tumor analyses will help define the tumor spectrum and estimate each tumor's risk.

Uveal melanoma: Current evidence on prognosis, treatment and potential developments

Uveal Melanoma (UM) is a rare disease, yet it is the most common primary intraocular malignancy in adult patients. Despite continuous advancements and research, the risk of metastasis remains high. It is possible to stratify patients according to their risk of metastases using a variety of known risk factors. Even though there is no gold standard for the prognostication of patients with uveal melanoma, it is becoming increasingly clear that combining histo-pathological, patient-related and molecular prognostic markers allows a more accurate prediction of the metastatic risk than by using one parameter. Primary UM in the eye are treated very effectively with eye-sparing radiation-based techniques or enucleation. However, it is not yet possible to prevent or treat metastases with the current therapeutic options. Nonetheless, the efforts to find new therapeutic targets continue and progress is being made, especially in the field of targeted therapy, as exemplified by the anti-gp100 bispecific molecule Tebentafusp. This review delves into the history of uveal melanoma, its incidence, presentation and diagnosis, the known prognostic factors and the treatment options, both for the primary tumour and for metastases. We show that different populations may have different risks for developing UM, and that each country should evaluate their own patients.

Genetic predisposition to gastrointestinal polyposis: syndromes, tumour features, genetic testing, and clinical management

Gastrointestinal tract polyposis is characterised by the presence of multiple polyps, particularly in the colorectum, and encompasses both cancer predisposition genetic syndromes and non-syndromic clinical manifestations. The sources of the heterogeneity observed in polyposis syndromes relate to genetic cause, mode of inheritance, polyp burden and histological type, and spectrum and frequency of extracolonic manifestations. These features determine the clinical management of carriers, including strategies for cancer prevention and early detection, and oncological treatments. Despite substantial progress in identifying the genetic causes of polyposis, a large proportion of cases remain genetically unexplained. Although some of these cases might be due to lifestyle, environmental factors, or cancer treatments, it is likely that additional polyposis predisposition genes will be identified. This Review provides an overview of the known syndromes and genes, genetic testing, and clinical management of patients with polyposis, and recent advances and challenges in the field of gastrointestinal polyposis.

PRAME Expression: A Target for Cancer Immunotherapy and a Prognostic Factor in Uveal Melanoma

Purpose

Uveal melanoma (UM) is a rare disease with a high mortality, and new therapeutic options are being investigated. Preferentially Expressed Antigen in Melanoma (PRAME) is a cancer testis antigen, expressed in the testis, but also in cancers, including uveal melanoma. PRAME is considered a target for immune therapy in several cancers, and PRAME-specific T cell clones have been shown to kill UM cells.

Methods

We studied the literature on PRAME expression in hematological and solid malignancies, including UM, and its role as a target for immunotherapy. The distribution of tumor features was compared between PRAME-high and PRAME-low UM in a 64-patient cohort from the Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) and in the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) cohort of 80 cases and differential gene expression analysis was performed in the LUMC cohort.

Results

PRAME is expressed in many malignancies, it is frequently associated with a negative prognosis, and can be the target of T cell receptor (TCR)-transduced T cells, a promising treatment option with high avidity and safety. In UM, PRAME is expressed in 26% to 45% of cases and is correlated with a worse prognosis. In the LUMC and the TCGA cohorts, high PRAME expression was associated with larger diameter, higher Tumor-Node-Metastasis (TNM) stage, more frequent gain of chromosome 8q, and an inflammatory phenotype.

Conclusions

We confirm that PRAME is associated with poor prognosis in UM and has a strong connection with extra copies of 8q. We show that PRAME-specific immunotherapy in an adjuvant setting is promising in treatment of malignancies, including UM.

MBD4-associated neoplasia syndrome: screening of cases with suggestive phenotypes

Germline mutations in MBD4, which, like MUTYH and NTHL1, encodes a glycosylase of the DNA based excision repair system, cause an autosomal recessive syndrome characterised by increased risk of acute myeloid leukaemia, gastrointestinal polyposis, colorectal cancer (CRC) and, to a lesser extent, uveal melanoma and schwannomas. To better define the phenotypic spectrum and tumour molecular features associated with biallelic MBD4-associated cancer predisposition, and study if heterozygous variants are associated with gastrointestinal tumour predisposition, we evaluated germline MBD4 status in 728 patients with CRC, polyposis, and other suggestive phenotypes (TCGA and in-house cohorts). Eight CRC patients carried rare homozygous or heterozygous germline variants in MBD4. The information gathered on mode of inheritance, variant nature, functional effect of the variant, and tumour mutational characteristics suggested that none of the patients included in the study had an MBD4-associated hereditary syndrome and that the heterozygous variants identified were not associated with the disease.

Immuno-oncology approaches in uveal melanoma: tebentafusp and beyond

Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common ocular malignancy in adults, associated with the poorest prognosis, with metastatic disease occurring in up to 50% of patients. In contrast to metastatic cutaneous melanoma, the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors is associated with poor outcomes in metastatic uveal melanoma (mUM). Tebentafusp, a bispecific molecule, has recently become the first treatment in decades to improve overall survival for mUM. This review summarises the existing and emerging immuno-oncology approaches for the treatment of mUM, and biomarkers of response and resistance to the same. Finally, we propose future research directions that could maximise treatment benefit to a wider pool of patients with UM.

Immunohistochemical characterisation of the immune landscape in primary uveal melanoma and liver metastases

BACKGROUND

The immune landscape of uveal melanoma liver metastases (UMLM) has not been sufficiently studied.

METHODS

Immune cell infiltrates (ICIs), PD-1 and PD-L1 were characterised in 62 UMLM and 28 primary uveal melanomas (PUM). ICI, PD-1 and PD-L1 were scored as: (1) % tumoral area occupied by tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes or macrophages (TILs, TIMs) and (2) % perTumoral (perT) area. ICIs and other variables including histopathologic growth patterns (HGPs), replacement and desmoplastic, of UMLM were analysed for their prognostic value.

RESULTS

ICIs recognised by haematoxylin-eosin-saffron (HES) and IHC (e.g., T cells (CD3), B cells (CD20). Macrophages (CD68), (CD163), were primarily localised to the perT region in PUM and UMLM and were more conspicuous in UMLM. HES, CD3, CD4, FoxP3, CD8, CD20, PD-1 TILs were scant (<5%). TIMs were more frequent, particularly in UMLM than in PUM. Both CD68+ TIMs and HGPs remained significant on multivariate analysis, influencing overall (OS) and metastasis-specific overall survival (MSOS). CD68 + , CD163+ and CD20+ perT infiltrates in UMLM predicted increased OS and MSOS on univariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

TILs and PD-L1 have no predictive value in PUM or UMLM. CD68+ and CD163+TIMs, CD20+ perT lymphocytes, and HGPs are important prognostic factors in UMLMs.

Efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibition in metastatic uveal melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Metastatic uveal melanoma (mUM) has historically been associated with short survival and limited effective treatments. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been trialed in mUM; however, robust conclusions regarding their efficacy are difficult to draw given small study sizes and heterogeneous patient populations. Five databases were searched using a combination of 'ICI' and 'mUM' headings, and data on patient demographics, objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were extracted. Pooled ORR was calculated using a random effects model and the inverse variance method. Available Kaplan-Meier OS and PFS curves were used to construct summary OS and PFS plots, from which median values were derived. Pooled ORR was 9.2% overall (95% CI 7.2-11.8) [4.1% for anti-CTLA4 (95% CI 2.1-7.7), 7.1% for anti-PD(L)1 (95% CI 4.5-10.9) and 13.5% for anti-CTLA4 plus anti-PD1 (95% CI 10.0-18.0)]. Median OS was 11.5 months overall (95% CI 9.5-13.8) [8.0 months for anti-CTLA4 (95% CI 5.5-9.9), 11.7 months for anti-PD(L)1 (95% CI 9.0-14.0) and 16.0 months for ipilimumab plus anti-PD1 (95% CI 11.5-17.7) ( P < 0.001)]. Median PFS was 3.0 months overall (95% CI 2.9-3.1). ICIs have limited efficacy in mUM and a recommendation for their use must consider the balance of benefit and risk for individual patients if no other options are available. Further biomarker profiling studies may be helpful in assessing which patients will benefit from ICIs, in particular the addition of ipilimumab to anti-PD1 therapy.

Uveal Melanoma Patients Have a Distinct Metabolic Phenotype in Peripheral Blood

Uveal melanomas (UM) are detected earlier. Consequently, tumors are smaller, allowing for novel eye-preserving treatments. This reduces tumor tissue available for genomic profiling. Additionally, these small tumors can be hard to differentiate from nevi, creating the need for minimally invasive detection and prognostication. Metabolites show promise as minimally invasive detection by resembling the biological phenotype. In this pilot study, we determined metabolite patterns in the peripheral blood of UM patients (n = 113) and controls (n = 46) using untargeted metabolomics. Using a random forest classifier (RFC) and leave-one-out cross-validation, we confirmed discriminatory metabolite patterns in UM patients compared to controls with an area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic of 0.99 in both positive and negative ion modes. The RFC and leave-one-out cross-validation did not reveal discriminatory metabolite patterns in high-risk versus low-risk of metastasizing in UM patients. Ten-time repeated analyses of the RFC and LOOCV using 50% randomly distributed samples showed similar results for UM patients versus controls and prognostic groups. Pathway analysis using annotated metabolites indicated dysregulation of several processes associated with malignancies. Consequently, minimally invasive metabolomics could potentially allow for screening as it distinguishes metabolite patterns that are putatively associated with oncogenic processes in the peripheral blood plasma of UM patients from controls at the time of diagnosis.

Advances in the clinical management of uveal melanoma

Melanomas arising in the uveal tract of the eye are a rare form of the disease with a biology and clinical phenotype distinct from their more common cutaneous counterparts. Treatment of primary uveal melanoma with radiotherapy, enucleation or other modalities achieves local control in more than 90% of patients, although 40% or more ultimately develop distant metastases, most commonly in the liver. Until January 2022, no systemic therapy had received regulatory approval for patients with metastatic uveal melanoma, and these patients have historically had a dismal prognosis owing to the limited efficacy of the available treatments. A series of seminal studies over the past two decades have identified highly prevalent early, tumour-initiating oncogenic genomic aberrations, later recurring prognostic alterations and immunological features that characterize uveal melanoma. These advances have driven the development of a number of novel emerging treatments, including tebentafusp, the first systemic therapy to achieve regulatory approval for this disease. In this Review, our multidisciplinary and international group of authors summarize the biology of uveal melanoma, management of primary disease and surveillance strategies to detect recurrent disease, and then focus on the current standard and emerging regional and systemic treatment approaches for metastatic uveal melanoma.

Genetics and RNA Regulation of Uveal Melanoma

Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common intraocular malignant tumor and the most frequent melanoma not affecting the skin. While the rate of UM occurrence is relatively low, about 50% of patients develop metastasis, primarily to the liver, with lethal outcome despite medical treatment. Notwithstanding that UM etiopathogenesis is still under investigation, a set of known mutations and chromosomal aberrations are associated with its pathogenesis and have a relevant prognostic value. The most frequently mutated genes are BAP1, EIF1AX, GNA11, GNAQ, and SF3B1, with mutually exclusive mutations occurring in GNAQ and GNA11, and almost mutually exclusive ones in BAP1 and SF3B1, and BAP1 and EIF1AX. Among chromosomal aberrations, monosomy of chromosome 3 is the most frequent, followed by gain of chromosome 8q, and full or partial loss of chromosomes 1 and 6. In addition, epigenetic mechanisms regulated by non-coding RNAs (ncRNA), namely microRNAs and long non-coding RNAs, have also been investigated. Several papers investigating the role of ncRNAs in UM have reported that their dysregulated expression affects cancer-related processes in both in vitro and in vivo models. This review will summarize current findings about genetic mutations, chromosomal aberrations, and ncRNA dysregulation establishing UM biology.

Prognostic Hematologic Biomarkers Following Immune Checkpoint Inhibition in Metastatic Uveal Melanoma

Background: There is no standardized treatment for metastatic uveal melanoma (MUM) but immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are increasingly used. While ICI has transformed the survival of metastatic cutaneous melanoma, MUM patients do not equally benefit. Factors known to affect ICI response include the hematologic markers, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and neutrophil:lymphocyte ratio (NLR). We evaluated the prognostic value of LDH and NLR at the start of ICI and on treatment in MUM. Methods: MUM patients were treated between August 2006 and May 2022 with combination ipilimumab/nivolumab or ipilimumab/nivolumab/pembrolizumab single-agent therapy. Univariable (UVA) and multivariable (MVA) analyses were used to assess the prognostic value of predefined baseline factors on progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: In forty-six patients with MUM treated with ICI, elevated baseline and on-treatment LDH was prognostic for OS (start of ICI, HR (95% CI): 3.6 (1.9−7.0), p < 0.01; on-treatment, HR (95% CI): 3.7 (1.6−8.8), p < 0.01) and PFS (start of ICI, (HR (95% CI): 2.8 (1.5−5.4), p < 0.0001); on-treatment LDH (HR (95% CI): 2.2 (1.1−4.3), p < 0.01). On-treatment NLR was prognostic for PFS (HR (95% CI): 1.9 (1.0−3.9), p < 0.01). On-treatment LDH remained an important contributor to survival on MVA (OS: HR (95% CI): 1.001 (1.00−1.002), p < 0.05); PFS: HR (95% CI): 1.001 (1.00−1.002), p < 0.01). Conclusions: This study demonstrates that LDH and NLR could be useful in the prognostication of MUM patients treated with ICI. Additional studies are needed to confirm the importance of these and other prognostic biomarkers.