[Cell therapy in all its forms]

Immunotherapy strategies have revolutionized the management of a significant number of patients in recent years, whether they are undergoing treatment for hematologic malignancies or solid tumors. This therapeutic class is extensive, ranging from antibodies targeting immune checkpoint molecules to adoptive cell therapy strategies, including bispecific antibodies and anticancer vaccines. All these strategies are currently in active development. Adoptive cell therapy involves the infusion of normal or genetically modified immune cells into a patient with the aim of restoring strong antitumor immunity, primarily associated with the cytotoxicity of T lymphocytes. Currently, there are three major adoptive cell therapy strategies: allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, CAR-T cell therapy, and TCR-T cell therapy. The objective of this article is to describe the mechanisms of action of these three strategies as well as their current advantages, limitations and constraints.

[Place of innovative therapies in the management of cervical cancer]

Despite optimized screening and prevention strategies, cervical cancer remains a major public health problem, even in developed countries. In France, the incidence is estimated at 3159 cases per year in 2023. While the management of early-stage cases is now highly standardized, few therapeutic advances were made in the treatment of metastatic stages before 2021, before the therapeutic arsenal that we know today took off. The aim of this review is to summarize these advances.

[Interest of focal radiotherapy in case of oligoprogression under immunotherapy in the treatment of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer]

INTRODUCTION

The prognosis of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been improved by the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). Unfortunately, in some cases, cancer cells will develop resistance mechanisms. In case of progression in a limited number of lesions (oligoprogression), focal treatment with radiotherapy is proposed while continuing the ICI therapy.

METHODS

A cohort of 37 patients with metastatic NSCLC treated with nivolumab (anti-PD-1) in second or subsequent line and who received focal radiotherapy for oligoprogression with continuation of nivolumab was compared with a control cohort of 87 patients no oligoprogressor treated par immunotherapy.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 37 months [18; 62], the median progression free survival (PFS) in the radiotherapy-treated cohort was 15.04 versus 5.04 months in the control cohort, with a statistically significant difference (P=0.048). The median PFS following focal radiotherapy in the oligoprogressor group was 7.5 months. In univariate analysis, the presence of lung metastasis was associated with increased PFS, in contrast to the presence of brain metastases, which were associated with decreased PFS in the radiotherapy group. The median overall survival was not reached in both groups, with no significant difference between the two cohorts.

CONCLUSION

The combination of focal radiotherapy in case of oligoprogression and continued treatment with nivolumab in the treatment of metastatic NSCLC in the second or subsequent line of treatment seems to be with an increase in PFS.

[Safety and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in elderly patients]

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are the standard of care for many solid tumors with specific physiopathology mechanisms and adverse events. While the percentage of elderly patients increase from years to years, these patients are underrepresented in clinical trials. Immunosenescence and inflammaging, two main components of the aging of our immune system, and their consequences on the safety and the efficacy are today major focus of clinical research. However, there are still no risk assessment score specific to ICI in elderly patients. In this review we showed the global reassuring data on safety from several retrospective and subgroup analysis, in elderly patients. In summary, impairment of the general state is an independent factor of occurrence of adverse events treatment related whatever the age. Here, we highlight the necessity to use of geriatric evaluation screening test in clinic, the need of specific risk score ICI use in the erdely population and mostly the inclusion of elderly patients in clinical trial to generate specific data.

Real-world dostarlimab use in advanced/recurrent endometrial cancer in France

INTRODUCTION

In October 2020, the French Health Authority granted early access outside of the clinical trial setting for dostarlimab, a programmed death-1 inhibitor. Dostarlimab was approved by the European Medicines Agency (in April 2021) as monotherapy for patients with post-platinum mismatch repair deficient/microsatellite instability-high advanced/recurrent endometrial cancer, based on the results of the GARNET trial (NCT02715284).

METHODS

This was a real-world descriptive analysis of patients granted cohort temporary authorization of use to receive dostarlimab between November 2020 and June 2021. Physicians could complete follow-up forms at each treatment cycle to provide clinical information, safety, and efficacy data. Safety and disease progression data were also captured through pharmacovigilance reports.

RESULTS

Of 95 temporary authorization of use requests made by 80 oncologists in 59 French hospitals, 87 patients were eligible, and 80 received≥1 dose of dostarlimab. Based on treatment response assessments received (n=43), the mean (standard deviation) time from treatment initiation to response evaluation was 11 (6) weeks. The disease control rate (complete plus partial responses plus stable disease rates) was 56% (n=24/43), and the overall response rate was 35% (n=15/43); both consistent with those reported in the GARNET trial. No new safety signals were reported.

DISCUSSION

The enrolment of 80 patients in an 8-month period highlights the need for access to novel treatment regimens in France for these patients post-platinum. Prospective randomized studies are ongoing to assess the efficacy and safety of dostarlimab and other checkpoint inhibitors as first-line treatment in patients with endometrial cancer.

Radiation-activated nanoparticles: Which combination to optimize radiosensitization?

Radiotherapy plays a crucial role in the treatment of various cancers. With the ongoing technological advancements in radiotherapy equipment, allowing for increasingly precise targeting of tumours, there are numerous strategies being explored to enhance its effectiveness by combining it with other therapies. Among these, metal nanoparticles seem to have a promising future driven by their ability to locally amplify the dose deposited by ionizing radiation, and to radiosensitize cells by modifying their oxidative status. Recent advancements in understanding the mechanisms of action of these nanoparticles have provided valuable insights for the development of new therapeutic combinations. Among these, the combination with immunotherapies would make it possible to benefit both from the amplified local effect of radiotherapy by nanoparticles and to induce a better antitumour immune response. In this article, we review shortly the existing literature on ongoing combinations and suggest potential novel therapies associated with the combination of radiotherapy and nanoparticles.

[Targeted systemic treatments and locoregional radiotherapy for breast cancer: Can we expect a benefit from the potentiation of local treatment?]

Breast cancer is the first most common cancer worldwide, and radiation therapy has a major role to play in locoregional adjuvant treatment. In recent years, we have seen the emergence of adjuvant targeted systemic therapies improving the prognosis of patients at high risk of recurrence. Practices concerning combinations of targeted therapies and locoregional radiation therapy for non-metastatic breast cancers often remain heterogeneous due to the low level of evidence and lack of validated recommendations. This literature review covers immunotherapy, CDK 4/6 inhibitors, PARP inhibitors and anti-Her2 therapies. Combining these targeted systemic therapies with radiation therapy could potentiate local treatment. The optimal therapeutic sequence and fractionation for maximum synergistic effect remain to be defined. However, while efficacy may be enhanced, radiosensitization of healthy tissue may also lead to increased toxicity. It appears possible to continue immunotherapy, trastuzumab, pertuzumab, TDM-1 or lapatinib during locoregional breast and lymph node irradiation. PARP inhibitors and CDK4/6 inhibitors are still to be suspended, due to the lack of data in the adjuvant setting and their short half-life, which does not necessitate prolonged discontinuation. As with the new antibody-drug conjugates, prospective data are needed in conjunction with adjuvant radiation therapy.

[Tertiary lymphoid structures in cancer: From biology to therapeutic guides]

Tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS) are inducible ectopic lymphoid aggregates, which form in response to various inflammatory situations, including cancer. TLS are notably composed of B lymphocytes, T lymphocytes, mature dendritic cells and other key players such as high endothelial venules. Furthermore, TLS can present different levels of organization and maturation, from simple T/B lymphocyte aggregates to authentic mature B cell follicles with germinal centers adjacent to T cell rich areas. While over the past decade, TLS may have been associated with a favorable prognosis in various cancers, the year 2022 was marked by the first prospective trial (PEMBROSARC) that reported the interest of TLS as predictive biomarkers of pembrolizumab efficacy for the treatment of soft-tissue sarcomas. All along this review, we will first address the molecular and cellular bases of TLS as well as the different strategies for identifying them in clinical practice, then discuss the prognostic/predictive impact of their presence and finally, we will elaborate on the current limitations and perspectives in translational research.

Long duration of immunotherapy before radiosurgery might improve intracranial control of melanoma brain metastases

PURPOSE

Despite significant advances that have been made in management of metastatic melanoma with immune checkpoint therapy, optimal timing of combination immune checkpoint therapy and stereotactic radiosurgery is unknown. We have reported toxicity and efficiency outcomes of patients treated with concurrent immune checkpoint therapy and stereotactic radiosurgery.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From January 2014 to December 2016, we analyzed 62 consecutive patients presenting 296 melanoma brain metastases, treated with gamma-knife and receiving concurrent immune checkpoint therapy with anti-CTLA4 or anti-PD1 within the 12 weeks of SRS procedure. Median follow-up time was 18 months (mo) (13-22). Minimal median dose delivered was 18 gray (Gy), with a median volume per lesion of 0.219 cm³.

RESULTS

The 1-year control rate per irradiated lesion was 89% (CI 95%: 80.41-98.97). Twenty-seven patients (43.5%) developed distant brain metastases after a median time of 7.6 months (CI 95% 1.8-13.3) after gamma-knife. In multivariate analysis, positive predictive factors for intracranial tumor control were: delay since the initiation of immunotherapy exceeding 2 months before gamma-knife procedure (P=0.003) and use of anti-PD1 (P=0.006). Median overall survival (OS) was 14 months (CI 95%: 11-NR). Total irradiated tumor volume<2.1 cm³ was a positive predictive factor for overall survival (P=0.003). Ten patients (16.13%) had adverse events following irradiation, with four grade≥3. Predictive factors of all grade toxicity were: female gender (P=0.001) and previous treatment with MAPK (P=0.05).

CONCLUSION

A long duration of immune checkpoint therapy before stereotactic radiosurgery might improve intracranial tumor control, but this relationship and its ideal timing need to be assessed in prospective trials.

[Combination strategies for checkpoint inhibition: Current practices and perspectives]

T-cell checkpoint blockade therapies have revolutionized treatment protocols and prognosis in patients with cancer. Pointed out by the success of PD-1 (programmed cell death-1) plus CTLA-4 (cytotoxic-T-lymphocyte associated antigen 4) blockade in patients with melanoma, the perspective of new synergistic immunotherapy combinations seems to be an important opportunity to improve outcomes for patients. In this article, we first focus on immunotherapy combinations that have shown their efficiency and that are currently approved in solid tumors. Then, we present a summary of emerging targets with reported pre-clinical efficacy and currently evaluated through ongoing clinical trials and other immunomodulatory molecules in the tumor microenvironment.

[Rare tumors: Angiosarcoma]

Angiosarcomas are a rare subtype representing 1-2% of soft tissue sarcomas. Risk factors are rarely elucidated but radiotherapy and lymphedema are the most common ones, usually following local treatment for local breast cancer. Despite the improvement of our knowledge, the prognosis remains poor with 35-40% of 5 year-overall survival. Local treatment when feasible should include a R0 surgery completed with adjuvant radiation. When metastatic, front lines chemotherapies include doxorubicine or weekly paclitaxel. If possible, in oligometastatic patients, metastasectomy should always be considered allowing the best responses. The knowledge of angiosarcoma's biology is rapidly increasing and new biomarkers are emerging. The use of immunotherapy in particular subtypes including head and neck angiosarcomas shows promising results. The model of the angiosarcoma project, a patient-participating study, seems to be an excellent way to study rare tumors. We should focus our efforts on understanding the underlying molecular biology to propose the best precision medicine for those patients.

[Collecting duct carcinoma and renal medullary carcinoma in the age of new therapies]

Collecting duct carcinoma (also known as Bellini tumour) and renal medullary carcinoma are two extremely rare and aggressive renal cancers. They are both less responsive to conventional treatments used in clear cell renal carcinoma. There are very few studies evaluating their optimal management and currently, at the metastatic stage, polychemotherapy based on platinum salts remains the most widely used. The emergence of new treatments such as anti-angiogenic TKIs, immunotherapy or treatments targeting specific genetic abnormalities, opens up a new field of possibilities in the management of these cancers. The evaluation of the response to these treatments is therefore essential. In this article, we will review the status of their management and the various studies that have evaluated recent treatments in these two cancers.

[Pathological pelvic lymph node involvement in muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients treated with radical cystectomy: A narrative review]

OBJECTIVE

To perform a narrative review of the contemporary literature on the diagnosis, prognosis and adjuvant management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) patients with pathological pelvic lymph node involvement (pN+) at radical cystectomy.

METHOD

A narrative review of the contemporary literature available on Medline was conducted to report studies evaluating the diagnosis, prognosis and/or adjuvant treatments for MIBC patients with pN+ disease at radical cystectomy.

RESULTS

Open or robotic extended pelvic lymph node dissection up to the crossing of the ureter with common iliac vessels can enhance the diagnosis of pN+ MIBC, especially using separate packages for the submission of a maximum number of lymph nodes. The main prognosis factors for pN+ patients are the number of positive and retrieved lymph nodes, lymph node density, extranodal extension as well as lymph node metastasis diameter. Adjuvant chemotherapy is likely to prolong overall survival in pN+ patients treated with radical cystectomy alone while adjuvant immunotherapy using nivolumab has been shown to decrease the risk of recurrence in all pN+ patients, especially those with ypN+ disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical cystectomy. However, few data are currently available on the role of adjuvant radiation therapy, which remains currently experimental for these patients.

CONCLUSION

Multiple parameters have been reported to impact the diagnosis and prognosis of patients with pN+ MIBC at radical cystectomy. Adjuvant management is currently based on chemotherapy and immunotherapy with preliminary data on radiation therapy.

[Immunotherapy in oncogynaecology]

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have deeply changed treatment paradigm of many tumor types, notably by providing long-term remissions, even in the metastatic setting. These immunotherapies aim to restore T-cells activity against tumour cells, in particular via the inhibition of PD1/PD-L1 interaction. As for lung or renal carcinomas, and melanomas, the management of endometrial and uterine cervical cancers has been disrupted by PD1/PD-L1 inhibitors efficacy. In locally advanced or metastatic cervical carcinomas, the combination of platinum-based chemotherapy with pembrolizumab demonstrated improved overall and progression-free survival in all subgroups of patients, and became the new standard of care. Regarding endometrial cancers, while single-agent immunotherapies have shown very limited activity in an unselected population, dostarlimab and pembrolizumab have been associated with remarkable antitumor activity in case of microsatellite instability (dMMR/MSI), detected in around 30% of patients. Finally, in endometrial cancer that has progressed after first-line chemotherapy, the association of pembrolizumab with an oral antiangiogenic kinase inhibitor (lenvatinib) has demonstrated its superiority over second-line chemotherapy regimens, regardless molecular subgroups, and has become the new standard of care in this indication.

Immunotherapy in Urological, Gynecological and Gastrointestinal Cancers - Current Landscape

Immunotherapy is becoming increasingly important in the management of urological, gynecological, and gastrointestinal cancers. Immune checkpoint inhibitor-based combinations have become a standard of care for patients with metastatic renal and liver cancers, as well as for many patients with bladder, cervical, gastric, and esophageal cancers, based on various biomarkers. Some tumor types are less responsive to immunotherapy, such as prostate and colon cancer. In these tumors, however, a subgroup of patients with a microsatellite-instability-high/DNA-mismatch repair deficient molecular phenotype significantly benefits from immunotherapy. Molecular characterization is therefore essential to identify patients who may benefit from these treatments. One of the major challenges is the search for new predictive biomarkers and novel combinations or strategies to further improve patient outcome.

The Future of Cancer Immunotherapy

This article describes three emerging, novel cancer immunotherapies: BITE, TIL and cancer vaccines are therapies that recognize specific targets on cancer cells and trigger a specific immune response. So far, not all tumor types can benefit from these approaches the best results have been observed in hematological malignancies, melanoma, and lung cancer. These novel biological products are currently being tested in several cancer centers in Switzerland, and physicians must be familiar with these procedures, as some of their patients might be treated with such therapies in the near future.

[CAR-T cells development in solid tumors]

CAR-T cells have produced very promising results in the field of onco-hematology and have been rapidly approved for marketing in France for several years now. In solid tumors, current results are more disappointing. Indeed, many hurdles come in the way. Tumor vascularization, the strongly immunosuppressive microenvironment, the loss of the target antigen as well as T cell exhaustion are part of the explanation of those results. Hence many researchers are working to develop strategies to counteract these resistance mechanisms. Arming CAR-T cells with BiTEs, with immune checkpoint inhibitors or with interleukins seem to be effective ways to improve antitumor efficacy. Other strategies including vaccines association or local delivery of the CAR-T cells look very promising. Many Phase I studies are investigating these new strategies and are expected to improve the previous results obtained to date in this area.

Head and neck cancers volume reduction: should we reduce our prophylactic node radiation to spare the antitumor immune response?

Radiotherapy for locally advanced head and neck cancer classically include large prophylactic node volume. However, the use of these large volumes can be responsible for significant toxicity. Furthermore, the disappointing results of radioimmunotherapy combinations in head and neck tumors raise concerns about radiotherapy's potential negative impact on the immune response when large lymph node volumes are treated. Besides, in other tumor locations, such as lung cancers, the volumes of elective irradiation have been considerably reduced, with the same local control as before. This opinion piece reviews the current state of radiation volumes in head and neck cancers, the rationale for these volumes, the potential impact of radiotherapy on immune response, and the volume changes that would improve the efficacy of radioimmunotherapy combinations.

[Challenges and limits of therapeutic de-escalation for papillomavirus-related oropharyngeal cancer]

The incidence of HPV-related oropharyngeal cancers has been increasing in Western countries for several decades. If they are individualized within the latest TNM classification, the current standards of management do not authorize the management of these patients to be singled out. However, their distinct oncogenesis and their excellent prognosis compared to other patients has allowed the development of several clinical trials based on the question of therapeutic de-escalation. This review of the literature aims to take stock of the elements provided by clinical research in recent years.

[Immuno-radiotherapy: A review of the rationale, recent clinical developments and future prospects]

Thanks to the success of checkpoint inhibitors, immunotherapy now plays a major role in the management of a large number of solid tumors, while the number of indications continues to grow and new combinations could, in the near future, further modify treatment standards. However, the response rates of immunotherapies as monotherapy are modest and their use is increasingly considered in combination with other cancer treatments (chemotherapy, surgery, radiotherapy or certain targeted therapies). Combinations with radiotherapy seem particularly attractive because there is a strong experimental rationale linking part of the efficacy of ionizing radiation to an induced stimulation of both of the innate and adaptive response. Many early phases and a number of large randomized combination trials have published efficacy and safety results, while important trials are still ongoing and will provide answers in the near future. This short review recalls the experimental biological rationale for immuno-radiotherapy and highlights some of the fundamental directions being explored, then presents the clinical efficacy and safety results available to date, those expected in the near future, and finally outlines the outlook in this rapidly evolving field.

Radiation therapy and antiangiogenic therapy: Opportunities and challenges

The importance of tumoral vascularization as a therapeutic target was first described in 1971 by Folkman. Anarchic vascularization in response to tumour hypoxia, especially mediated by vascular endothelial growth factor, represents a major target in the management of many cancers. The contribution of systemic anti-angiogenic treatments including humanized anti-VEGF monoclonal antibodies (bevacizumab) and tyrosine kinase inhibitors, whose effect on vascular normalization and correction of tumour hypoxia has been shown in preclinical studies to be enhancing the effect of radiotherapy. Early trials combining radiotherapy and antiangiogenics with a small number of patients have contradictory results and tend to put into perspective the opportunity that this synergistic association represents. The efficiency found must be tempered by some toxicity described, especially in association with high doses per fraction. The aim of this article is to present the main studies reporting the efficiency and safety of the combination of antiangiogenic drugs and radiotherapy, as well as the expected opportunities.

[Management of immunotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer presenting durable oncological response]

INTRODUCTION

Concerns about the proper schedule for discontinuing immunotherapy have been raised by many clinicians, as well as the minimal check-up required to assess residual disease before stopping immunotherapy. In fact, there currently exist no recommendations concerning immunotherapy prescription and optimal assessment in the event of persistent oncological response in cases of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

We conducted an online survey among board-certified French Thoracic Oncologists belonging to two professional associations. The survey included multiple-choice questions that either stood alone or were included in case reports.

RESULTS

The survey was sent to 490 physicians, of whom 88 responded. For minimal residual disease assessment after 2 years of immunotherapy, PET-scan is prescribed by 92% of respondents and cerebral MRI by 59%. In the event of complete response after 2 years of treatment, 83% of physicians stop prescribing pembrolizumab and 70% discontinue nivolumab. In the event of partial response, 88% of respondents continue immunotherapy. In this case, only 33% use a complementary locoregional treatment such as radiotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Our survey highlights a pronounced tendency to stop immunotherapy in the event of complete oncological response. In the event of partial morphologic response, on the other hand, there is a tendency to continue immunotherapy. However, the use of locoregional treatments remains more heterogeneous.

[Immune-related pneumonitis: A differential diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia]

Introduction

Les inhibiteurs de points de contrôle immunitaire ont révolutionné la prise en charge de nombreux cancers et ont permis d’obtenir une efficacité et une réponse durable pour certains patients. L’immunothérapie est associée à des effets secondaires en lien avec l’infiltration de cellules immunitaires dans les tissus normaux pouvant entraîner des réactions dysimmunitaires disproportionnées. Ces effets secondaires peuvent toucher n’importe quel organe, dont le poumon, pouvant parfois engager le pronostic vital. Ils peuvent ressembler à des événements de nature infectieuse, dont la COVID-19.

Observations

Nous rapportons le cas de 3 patients ayant présenté des toxicités pulmonaires sévères secondaires à l’immunothérapie entre mars et mai 2020 avec hypothèse initiale d’une pneumopathie à SARS-CoV-2. Après investigations approfondies, le diagnostic de toxicité pulmonaire à l’immunothérapie fut retenu, avec une évolution clinique et radiologique favorable suite à l’instauration d’une corticothérapie.

Conclusion

La toxicité pulmonaire secondaire à l’immunothérapie reste un effet indésirable rare, mais pouvant engager le pronostic vital. La démarche diagnostique impose d’éliminer plusieurs diagnostics différentiels. Le tableau clinique est réversible et l’évolution habituellement favorable après instauration d’une corticothérapie.

The SQ HDM SLIT-Tablet is safe and well tolerated in patients with House Dust Mite allergic rhinitis with or without asthma: A "real-life" French study

Background

The SQ House Dust Mite (HDM) SubLingual ImmunoTherapy (SLIT)‐Tablet (Acarizax) is the only allergen immunotherapy authorized by European regulatory authorities to treat HDM‐induced allergic asthma (AA) that is not well‐controlled by inhaled corticosteroids and associated with mild‐to‐severe HDM allergic rhinitis (AR). The aim of this study was to add evidence on the safety of the SQ HDM SLIT‐Tablet in patients with AR, alone or with AA, under real‐life conditions.

Methods

This was a French “real‐life”, multicenter, non‐comparative, longitudinal, prospective study. It included patients initiating the SQ HDM SLIT‐Tablet for either persistent moderate‐to‐severe HDM AR or AA not well‐controlled by inhaled corticosteroids and associated with mild‐to‐severe HDM AR. Adverse Events (AEs) were collected at the first intake and throughout the study. Logistic regression was used to compare safety according to asthma control before treatment initiation.

Results

Between May 09, 2018 and May 29, 2019, 1526 patients were enrolled at 185 sites and 1483 were included in the safety population (SAF). Of them, 33.6% had suspected clinical manifestations of AA. Asthma was uncontrolled for 18.2% of the patients, partially controlled for 27.9% and well‐controlled for 53.8%. Overall, 31.9% of the SAF patients experienced at least one AE. The percentage of patients with AEs was 29.9% among patients with AR alone and 35.9% among those with AA (p = 0.0193). No significant difference was observed in the rate of AE or SAE depending on asthma control at inclusion (2.2% of SAEs reported for patients with uncontrolled asthma, 1.4% for partly controlled and 1.1% for well‐controlled).

Conclusions

The overall results indicate a good SQ HDM SLIT‐Tablet safety profile consistent with that reported in previous studies, regardless of asthma control.

[Development of allogeneic CAR T-cells]

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy represents a major breakthrough in the field of hematology. "Off-the-shelf" allogeneic CAR T-cells from donors have many potential advantages over autologous approaches, such as the immediate availability of cryopreserved batches, possible standardization of the cell product, time for multiple cell modifications, redosing and decreased cost. However, allogeneic T-cells possess foreign immunological identities that can lead to graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) and their rejection by the host immune system. In this review, we describe the different approaches to produce allogeneic CAR T-cells with limited potential for GvHD and that can persist in the recipient. The preliminary clinical results obtained with the first generation of allogeneic CAR T-cells are presented as well as the perspectives in hematological malignancies and solid tumors.

[Bispecific antibodies targeting CD3 in oncology and hematology]

Bispecific therapies targeting CD3, so-called T-cell engagers (TCE), belong to the new spectrum of anti-tumor immunotherapies stimulating T-lymphocytes. TCE are unique constructs targeting the MHC-independent CD3 epsilon subunit (CD3e) and a tumor antigen. To date, only blinatumomab have reached market agreements in lymphoid malignancies with constructs targeting CD3exCD19. Other TCE are in advances development, with promising results targeting CD20 and BSMA in lymphoma and myeloma. These successes have relaunched the development of TCE in solid tumors, bringing mixed results so far (notably in terms of tolerance). Still, TCE pave the way to new immunotherapy in tumors considered to be refractory to inhibitors of immune checkpoints such as prostate cancer or colorectal cancer.

[Bispecific antibodies in multiple myeloma]

Immunotherapies have recently emerged as potential game changers in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM). Those include monoclonal antibodies (targeting CD38 or CS1), bispecific antibodies (BsAb, mainly targeting BCMA, GPRC5D or FcRH5), antibody-drug conjugate (mainly targeting BCMA) and CAR-T cells (mainly targeting BCMA). BsAb have the capacity to bind two different antigens, one at the tumor cell surface and one on T cells (CD3), recreating the immune synapse. In this article, we discuss the main clinical data on BsAb in MM, as well as their different constructs and the potential mechanism of resistance.

[CAR-T cells in lymphomas: Current and evolving role]

Three CD19 CAR-T cells (Yescarta®, Kymriah® and Breyanzi®), have been approved in relapsed or refractory diffuse large B cell lymphomas (DLBCL) after at least two previous lines of therapy. These immunotherapies have transformed the prognosis of these lymphomas, which can't be cured by conventional treatments. Long-term updates of registration studies as well as the first real-life data allow a better knowledge of the efficacy of these emerging therapies, their toxicity and their resistance mechanisms. These advances have also led to consider the earlier use of CAR-T cells in the therapeutic strategy and to extend it to other B lymphomas such as mantle cell and indolent lymphomas. Indeed, Yescarta® and Tecartus® have been recently approved in those malignancies, Furthermore, other strategies are being investigated to develop new CAR-T cells to target Hodgkin's lymphomas and T-cell lymphomas, although data in these settings still have to be completed. In this article, we review the latest data on the use of CAR-T cells in lymphomas.

[CAR-T CELLS: How does the EBMT registry monitor European activities, identify hurdles and prepare for changes in regulations]

CAR-T Cells are gene therapy medicinal products, a subcategory of Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products as defined in the EC Regulation 1394/2007. They may represent the first example of such medicinal products that are industry-manufactured and commercialized on a large scale. Their very nature, their manufacturing processes, pricing and conditions upon which they were approved by regulatory agencies, all lead the latter to require long-term follow-up after marketing approval with a view for a better definition of CAR-T Cells safety profile and efficacy profile in real world conditions. Collection and analysis of data over a 15-year period of time represents a technical and political challenge. So does the a priori definition of data to be collected for a wealth of forthcoming analyses that focus on the interests of a variety of stakeholders. EBMT has been collecting and analyzing data on hematopoietic cell transplants for decades. EBMT currently works with many interested parties to collect data on patients treated with CAR-T Cells.

[Chimeric antigen receptor T cells]

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T-cells) therapies which are genetically modified T lymphocyte targeting tumor antigens have modified therapeutic landscape in hematology. Aggressive B cells lymphoma are currently treated in daily practice with anti-CD19 CAR T. In indolent B cell lymphomas, their efficacy has been established by recent clinical trials. Longer follow-up evaluation is needed to determine their added value in a field where approved strategies already provide high long-term survival rates. They will also be challenged by another immunotherapy with bispecific antibodies. In chronic lymphoid leukemia, early phase trials have identified several limitations related to the immune context of this disease, but associations with targeted therapy like ibrutinib are very promising. In this moving therapeutic landscape, molecular and cellular engineering progress will increase the capacities of these new cellular-based therapies.

[Bispecific antibodies in onco-hematology: Applications and perspectives]

Bispecific antibodies are novel approaches of immunotherapy engaging immune cells to destroy tumor cells. Their structure is variable and underlies their pharmacocinetic properties. These coumpounds are now being evaluated across multiple hematological malignancies. The anti-CD3/CD19 antibody blinatumomab is the first in class and have been approved for the treatment of patients with Ph-negative B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Other emerging applications are lymphoma, multiple myeloma and acute myeloid leukemia. The safety profile of bispecific antibodies is acceptable while limited by neurotoxicity and cytokine-release syndrome. The present review aims to depict the landscape of emerging bispecific antibodies currently in development for hematological malignancies.

[Allogeneic CAR-NK cells: A promising alternative to autologous CAR-T cells - State of the art, sources of NK cells, limits and perspectives]

Immunotherapy with chimeric antigen receptor engineered-T cells (CAR-T) has revolutionized the landscape of treatment of relapsed or refractory B-cell. However, the use of autologous T cells has limitations: variable quality of collected effector T cells, duration of the process sometimes incompatible with uncontrolled hemopathy, limited number of available CAR cells, sometimes fatal toxicities, extremely high cost. Natural Killer (NK) cells are an interesting alternative to T cells. NK cells are very powerful cytotoxic effectors that have demonstrated an anti-tumor effect after haploidentical hematopoietic stem cells transplantation or in adoptive cell therapy against a number of solid or hematological tumors. Mainly, they can be used in allogeneic situations without causing major toxic side effects. The sources of NK cells are multiple: cell line, cord blood, peripheral blood, induced pluripotent stem cells. Recent advances in manufacturing engineered CAR-NK cells make it possible to promote antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC), as well as the activation and persistence of these cells, notably via the cytokine Il-15. The majority of the reports on CAR-NK cells concern pre-clinical or early clinical trials. However, the many advantages of "off-the-shelf" allogeneic CAR-NK cells provide great potential in cancer treatments.

Radiotherapy for primary lung cancer

Herein are presented the recommendations from the Société française de radiothérapie oncologique regarding indications and modalities of lung cancer radiotherapy. The recommendations for delineation of the target volumes and organs at risk are detailed.

[Immunotherapy adaptation in lung cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic]

INTRODUCTION

COVID-19 pandemics required changes in medical practices. In thoracic oncology, pembrolizumab was doubled to 400mg every 6weeks, nivolumab to 480mg every 4weeks. The objective of our study was to assess the impact on quality of life, and on psychological state, as well as the tolerance, of this new schedule.

METHODS

Thoracic oncologic patients who underwent these therapeutic changes in our center during the first COVID-19 epidemic wave were included. Their quality of life was assessed using the Quality of Life Questionnaire-30, their psychological state by the Hospital Anxiety Depression (HAD) scale. We also reported the preferred administration schedule, as well as adverse events.

RESULTS

Thirty patients were included. The overall quality of life was preserved. Rates on HAD scale were low. Tolerance was acceptable. In majority, patients preferred the new procedure. They had a significantly better quality of life compared to those who preferred the old one.

CONCLUSIONS

This new immunotherapy schedule in thoracic oncology is well tolerated and allows a preservation of quality of life. This therapeutic option may be favored in the context of COVID-19 pandemics.

Combination of radiation therapy-immunotherapy for head and neck cancers: Promises kept?

Chemoradiotherapy with concurrent cisplatin has been the standard treatment for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) for over 20 years. Recently, immunotherapy, a new therapeutic class, has emerged for patients with recurrent or metastatic HNSCC and has significantly extended their survival. Will it bring the same benefit to patients with localized tumors? There is a strong rationale for combining radiation therapy and checkpoint inhibitors for HNSCC. Indeed, radiation therapy can have both immunostimulatory and immunomodulatory effects. This is what explains the famous abscopal effect. The aim of this review is to present the data available on the combination of radiation therapy and immunotherapy for HNSCC.