Tolerability of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with cancer and pre-existing multiple sclerosis

Immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer patients with autoimmune disease: Safety and efficacy

The utilization of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in cancer immunotherapy frequently leads to the occurrence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs), making it generally not recommended for patients with preexisting autoimmune diseases. Hence, we conducted a meta-analysis on safety and efficacy of ICIs in cancer patients with preexisting autoimmune diseases to provide further insights. PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were systematically searched until December 20, 2024. The main summary measures used were pooled rate and risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidential interval (CI), which were analyzed using R statistic software. A total of 52 articles were included in the study. When cancer patients with preexisting autoimmune diseases received ICIs treatment, the overall incidence was 0.610 (95% CI: 0.531-0.686) for any grade irAEs, 0.295 (95% CI: 0.248-0.343) for flares, 0.325 (95% CI: 0.258-0.396) for de novo irAEs, 0.238 (95% CI: 0.174-0.309) for grade ≥3 irAEs, and 0.143 (95% CI: 0.109-0.180) for discontinuation due to immunotoxicity. Compared with those without autoimmune diseases, cancer patients with autoimmune diseases experienced a higher risk of any-grade irAEs (RR: 1.23, 95% CI: 1.12-1.35) and discontinuation due to immunotoxicity (1.40, 95% CI: 1.11-1.78). However, no statistically significant differences were observed in the incidence of grade ≥3 irAEs, objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) between the two groups. During ICIs treatment, irAEs are common among cancer patients with autoimmune diseases, but severe irAEs is relatively low. ICIs are effective in this population, but should be strictly monitored when used to avoid immunotoxicity.

Outcomes in patients with multiple sclerosis and solid organ cancers treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors

Background

Multiple sclerosis (MS) patients are excluded from studies of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) due to concern for MS flare. This study aims to report the incidence of MS relapse, immune-related adverse events (irAEs), and cancer outcomes in MS patients with solid-organ malignancy treated with ICIs.

Methods

In this retrospective study, MS patients who received ICIs at University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center were identified electronically. Information on MS relapses, irAEs, and cancer outcomes after ICI initiation was collected and analyzed.

Results

Twelve patients were included in the study, all of whom had inactive MS. No patient experienced MS relapse or new lesions on brain MRI after ICI initiation. Two patients (16.7%) had severe irAEs (grade ≥ 3), which was acute pneumonitis. No deaths were associated. The objective response rate was 50%. An additional year of age was associated with a 14.2% decrease in the risk of developing severe irAEs (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.858; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.798-0.922; P < .0001) and a 10.3% decrease in the risk of disease progression (HR = 0.897; 95% CI: 0.823-0.976; P = .0120). No significant difference in risk of having severe irAEs, overall survival, or progression-free survival was found between MS patients with and without DMTs.

Conclusions

Our study suggests that ICIs could be safely used in patients with inactive MS with a low risk of MS relapse and comparable irAE risk with the general population. Although larger studies are needed for confirmation, the benefit of using ICIs to treat solid-organ malignancies might outweigh the risk of withholding treatment for this population.

Do immune checkpoint inhibitors affect the course of multiple sclerosis? A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Elderly people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) present higher probability of malignancies. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) improve cancer prognosis but pose risk of disease flares in people with pre-existing autoimmune conditions, including MS. Data addressing the impact of ICIs on MS are scarce. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the effects of ICIs on MS disease activity.

METHODS

A systematic literature search in Google Scholar and PubMed, following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, identified five observational studies. Data on clinical and neuroradiological outcomes were analyzed using random-effects models.

RESULTS

The clinical activity meta-analysis included 90 pwMS undergoing ICI therapy (median follow-up = 0.62-1.85 years, 103.74 patient-years). The pooled relapse rate was 5.45 per 100 patient-years (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.86-14.92). Median time to relapse was 1 month after the ICI start (range = 0.4-6 months). No relapse occurred after 58 years. The neuroradiological activity meta-analysis was conducted on 36 pwMS (median magnetic resonance imaging [MRI] follow-up = 0.75-1.85 years, 41.94 patient-years). The pooled new MRI lesion rate was 24.9 per 100 patient-years (95% CI = 10.9-47.3), with median time to new MRI lesions of 3 months (range = 1-6 months). In 80% of cases, disease-modifying treatment (DMT) was suspended at ICI initiation.

CONCLUSIONS

We found a low relapse rate in pwMS following ICI treatment, with no events in older pwMS. The risk of neuroradiological activity appears higher, but mainly occurs in pwMS who discontinued DMT. All events occurred within the first 6 months of ICI therapy. These conclusions are based on small observational studies, highlighting the urgent need for further research on this topic.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies and uncontrolled trials reporting on the use of checkpoint blockers in patients with cancer and pre-existing autoimmune disease

BACKGROUND

Cancer patients with autoimmune disease have been excluded from randomized trials of immune checkpoint blockers (ICBs). We conducted a systematic review of observational studies and uncontrolled trials including cancer patients with pre-existing autoimmune disease who received ICBs.

METHODS

We searched 5 electronic databases through November 2023. Study selection, data collection, and quality assessment were performed independently by 2 investigators. We performed a meta-analysis to pool incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs), including de novo events and flares of existing autoimmune disease, hospitalizations due to irAEs, as well as deaths.

RESULTS

A total of 95 studies were included (23,897 patients with cancer and preexisting autoimmune disease). The most common cancer evaluated was lung cancer (30.7 %) followed by skin cancer (15.7 %). Patients with autoimmune disease were more likely to report irAEs compared to patients without autoimmune disease (relative risk 1.3, 95 % CI 1.0 to 1.6). The pooled occurrence rate of any irAEs (flares or de novo) was 61 % (95 % CI 54 % to 68 %); that of flares was 36 % (95 % CI 30 % to 43 %), and that of de novo irAEs was 23 % (95 % CI 16 % to 30 %). Flares were mild (grade <3) in half of cases and more commonly reported in patients with psoriasis/psoriatic arthritis (39 %), inflammatory bowel disease (37 %), and rheumatoid arthritis (36 %). 32 % of the patients with irAEs required hospitalization and treatment of irAEs included corticosteroids in 72 % of the cases. The irAEs mortality rate was 0.07 %. There were no statistically significant differences in cancer response to ICBs between patients with and without autoimmune disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Although more patients with pre-existing autoimmune disease had irAEs, these were mild and managed with corticosteroids in most cases, with no impact on cancer response. These results suggest that ICBs can be used in these patients, but careful monitoring is required, as over a third of the patients will experience a flare of their autoimmune disease and/or require hospitalization. These findings provide a crucial foundation for oncologists to refine their monitoring and management strategies, ensuring that the benefits of ICB therapy are maximized while minimizing its risks.

Impact of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors on the Course of Multiple Sclerosis

OBJECTIVES

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are increasingly used in cancer treatment. Their mechanism of action raises the question of possible exacerbation of preexisting multiple sclerosis (MS). The aim of our study was to assess the risk of increased MS activity, defined by the occurrence of a relapse and/or a new MRI lesion, after ICI initiation.

METHODS

This French multicentric study collected retrospective and prospective data on patients with MS treated with ICIs after a cancer diagnosis.

RESULTS

We identified 18 patients with a median age of 48 years. Three of them (17%), all aged 50 years or younger, with a relapsing-remitting course, showed clinical and/or radiologic signs of MS activity 3 to 6 months after ICI initiation. They had stopped disease-modifying treatment (DMT) several months earlier, at the time of cancer diagnosis. Only one had both clinical and MRI activity, with mild severity and complete recovery.

DISCUSSION

Our study suggests that the overall risk of MS activity under ICI is low and could be mainly driven by DMT discontinuation, as in MS in general. Although larger studies are needed for better risk assessment in younger patients with more active disease, ICI should be considered when needed in patients with MS.

Predictive Factors in Metastatic Melanoma Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: From Clinical Practice to Future Perspective

The introduction of immunotherapy revolutionized the treatment landscape in metastatic melanoma. Despite the impressive results associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), only a portion of patients obtain a response to this treatment. In this scenario, the research of predictive factors is fundamental to identify patients who may have a response and to exclude patients with a low possibility to respond. These factors can be host-associated, immune system activation-related, and tumor-related. Patient-related factors can vary from data obtained by medical history (performance status, age, sex, body mass index, concomitant medications, and comorbidities) to analysis of the gut microbiome from fecal samples. Tumor-related factors can reflect tumor burden (metastatic sites, lactate dehydrogenase, C-reactive protein, and circulating tumor DNA) or can derive from the analysis of tumor samples (driver mutations, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, and myeloid cells). Biomarkers evaluating the immune system activation, such as IFN-gamma gene expression profile and analysis of circulating immune cell subsets, have emerged in recent years as significantly correlated with response to ICIs. In this manuscript, we critically reviewed the most updated literature data on the landscape of predictive factors in metastatic melanoma treated with ICIs. We focus on the principal limits and potentiality of different methods, shedding light on the more promising biomarkers.