|
1
|
Delaloge S, Khan SA, Wesseling J, Whelan T. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: finding the balance between overtreatment and undertreatment. Lancet 2024:S0140-6736(24)00425-2. [PMID: 38735296 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(24)00425-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2022] [Revised: 01/10/2024] [Accepted: 02/29/2024] [Indexed: 05/14/2024]
Abstract
Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) accounts for 15-25% of all breast cancer diagnoses. Its prognosis is excellent overall, the main risk being the occurrence of local breast events, as most cases of DCIS do not progress to invasive cancer. Systematic screening has greatly increased the incidence of this non-obligate precursor of invasion, lending urgency to the need to identify DCIS that is prone to invasive progression and distinguish it from non-invasion-prone DCIS, as the latter can be overdiagnosed and therefore overtreated. Treatment strategies, including surgery, radiotherapy, and optional endocrine therapy, decrease the risk of local events, but have no effect on survival outcomes. Active surveillance is being evaluated as a possible new option for low-risk DCIS. Considerable efforts to decipher the biology of DCIS have led to a better understanding of the factors that determine its variable natural history. Given this variability, shared decision making regarding optimal, personalised treatment strategies is the most appropriate course of action. Well designed, risk-based de-escalation studies remain a major need in this field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suzette Delaloge
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Interception Programme, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
| | - Seema Ahsan Khan
- Department of Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Jelle Wesseling
- Divisions of Molecular Pathology & Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Timothy Whelan
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
|
2
|
Leonardi MC, Zerella MA, Lazzeroni M, Fusco N, Veronesi P, Galimberti VE, Corso G, Dicuonzo S, Rojas DP, Morra A, Gerardi MA, Lorubbio C, Zaffaroni M, Vincini MG, Orecchia R, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Magnoni F. Tools to Guide Radiation Oncologists in the Management of DCIS. Healthcare (Basel) 2024; 12:795. [PMID: 38610216 PMCID: PMC11011767 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12070795] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2024] [Revised: 03/27/2024] [Accepted: 04/03/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Similar to invasive breast cancer, ductal carcinoma in situ is also going through a phase of changes not only from a technical but also a conceptual standpoint. From prescribing radiotherapy to everyone to personalized approaches, including radiotherapy omission, there is still a lack of a comprehensive framework to guide radiation oncologists in decision making. Many pieces of the puzzle are finding their place as high-quality data mature and are disseminated, but very often, the interpretation of risk factors and the perception of risk remain very highly subjective. Sharing the therapeutic choice with patients requires effective communication for an understanding of risks and benefits, facilitating an informed decision that does not increase anxiety and concerns about prognosis. The purpose of this narrative review is to summarize the current state of knowledge to highlight the tools available to radiation oncologists for managing DCIS, with an outlook on future developments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Cristina Leonardi
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (M.C.L.); (S.D.); (D.P.R.); (A.M.); (M.A.G.); (C.L.); (M.Z.); (M.G.V.); (B.A.J.-F.)
| | - Maria Alessia Zerella
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (M.C.L.); (S.D.); (D.P.R.); (A.M.); (M.A.G.); (C.L.); (M.Z.); (M.G.V.); (B.A.J.-F.)
| | - Matteo Lazzeroni
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Genetics, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy;
| | - Nicola Fusco
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20141 Milan, Italy; (N.F.); (P.V.); (G.C.)
- Division of Pathology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Veronesi
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20141 Milan, Italy; (N.F.); (P.V.); (G.C.)
- Division of Breast Surgery, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (V.E.G.); (F.M.)
| | - Viviana Enrica Galimberti
- Division of Breast Surgery, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (V.E.G.); (F.M.)
| | - Giovanni Corso
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20141 Milan, Italy; (N.F.); (P.V.); (G.C.)
- Division of Breast Surgery, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (V.E.G.); (F.M.)
| | - Samantha Dicuonzo
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (M.C.L.); (S.D.); (D.P.R.); (A.M.); (M.A.G.); (C.L.); (M.Z.); (M.G.V.); (B.A.J.-F.)
| | - Damaris Patricia Rojas
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (M.C.L.); (S.D.); (D.P.R.); (A.M.); (M.A.G.); (C.L.); (M.Z.); (M.G.V.); (B.A.J.-F.)
| | - Anna Morra
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (M.C.L.); (S.D.); (D.P.R.); (A.M.); (M.A.G.); (C.L.); (M.Z.); (M.G.V.); (B.A.J.-F.)
| | - Marianna Alessandra Gerardi
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (M.C.L.); (S.D.); (D.P.R.); (A.M.); (M.A.G.); (C.L.); (M.Z.); (M.G.V.); (B.A.J.-F.)
| | - Chiara Lorubbio
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (M.C.L.); (S.D.); (D.P.R.); (A.M.); (M.A.G.); (C.L.); (M.Z.); (M.G.V.); (B.A.J.-F.)
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20141 Milan, Italy; (N.F.); (P.V.); (G.C.)
| | - Mattia Zaffaroni
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (M.C.L.); (S.D.); (D.P.R.); (A.M.); (M.A.G.); (C.L.); (M.Z.); (M.G.V.); (B.A.J.-F.)
| | - Maria Giulia Vincini
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (M.C.L.); (S.D.); (D.P.R.); (A.M.); (M.A.G.); (C.L.); (M.Z.); (M.G.V.); (B.A.J.-F.)
| | - Roberto Orecchia
- Scientific Directorate, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy;
| | - Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (M.C.L.); (S.D.); (D.P.R.); (A.M.); (M.A.G.); (C.L.); (M.Z.); (M.G.V.); (B.A.J.-F.)
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20141 Milan, Italy; (N.F.); (P.V.); (G.C.)
| | - Francesca Magnoni
- Division of Breast Surgery, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (V.E.G.); (F.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
|
3
|
Vanni G, Pellicciaro M, Di Lorenzo N, Barbarino R, Materazzo M, Tacconi F, Squeri A, D’Angelillo RM, Berretta M, Buonomo OC. Surgical De-Escalation for Re-Excision in Patients with a Margin Less Than 2 mm and a Diagnosis of DCIS. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:743. [PMID: 38398134 PMCID: PMC10886566 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16040743] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2024] [Revised: 02/01/2024] [Accepted: 02/06/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
The current surgical guidelines recommend an optimal margin width of 2 mm for the management of patients diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). However, there are still many controversies regarding re-excision when the optimal margin criteria are not met in the first resection. The purpose of this study is to understand the importance of surgical margin width, re-excision, and treatments to avoid additional surgery on locoregional recurrence (LRR). The study is retrospective and analyzed surgical margins, adjuvant treatments, re-excision, and LRR in patients with DCIS who underwent breast-conserving surgery (BCS). A total of 197 patients were enrolled. Re-operation for a close margin rate was 13.5%, and the 3-year recurrence was 7.6%. No difference in the LRR was reported among the patients subjected to BCS regardless of the margin width (p = 0.295). The recurrence rate according to margin status was not significant (p = 0.484). Approximately 36.9% (n: 79) patients had resection margins < 2 mm. A sub-analysis of patients with margins < 2 mm showed no difference in the recurrence between the patients treated with a second surgery and those treated with radiation (p = 0.091). The recurrence rate according to margin status in patients with margins < 2 mm was not significant (p = 0.161). The margin was not a predictive factor of LRR p = 0.999. Surgical re-excision should be avoided in patients with a focally positive margin and no evidence of the disease at post-surgical imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gianluca Vanni
- Breast Unit Policlinico Tor Vergata, Department of Surgical Science, Tor Vergata University, Viale Oxford 81, 00133 Rome, Italy; (G.V.); (M.M.); (O.C.B.)
| | - Marco Pellicciaro
- Breast Unit Policlinico Tor Vergata, Department of Surgical Science, Tor Vergata University, Viale Oxford 81, 00133 Rome, Italy; (G.V.); (M.M.); (O.C.B.)
- Ph.D. Program in Applied Medical-Surgical Sciences, Department of Surgical Science, Tor Vergata University, 00133 Rome, Italy
| | - Nicola Di Lorenzo
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Tor Vergata University, 00133 Rome, Italy;
| | - Rosaria Barbarino
- Radiotherapy, Department of Oncoematology, Policlinico Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy; (R.B.); (R.M.D.)
| | - Marco Materazzo
- Breast Unit Policlinico Tor Vergata, Department of Surgical Science, Tor Vergata University, Viale Oxford 81, 00133 Rome, Italy; (G.V.); (M.M.); (O.C.B.)
- Ph.D. Program in Applied Medical-Surgical Sciences, Department of Surgical Science, Tor Vergata University, 00133 Rome, Italy
| | - Federico Tacconi
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Unit of Thoracic Surgery, Tor Vergata University, 00133 Rome, Italy;
| | - Andrea Squeri
- School of Specialization in Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Human Pathology “G. Barresi”, University of Messina, 98100 Messina, Italy;
| | - Rolando Maria D’Angelillo
- Radiotherapy, Department of Oncoematology, Policlinico Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy; (R.B.); (R.M.D.)
| | - Massimiliano Berretta
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, 98100 Messina, Italy;
| | - Oreste Claudio Buonomo
- Breast Unit Policlinico Tor Vergata, Department of Surgical Science, Tor Vergata University, Viale Oxford 81, 00133 Rome, Italy; (G.V.); (M.M.); (O.C.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
|
4
|
Buchheit JT, Schacht D, Kulkarni SA. Update on Management of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ. Clin Breast Cancer 2023:S1526-8209(23)00325-7. [PMID: 38216382 DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2023.12.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2023] [Revised: 12/15/2023] [Accepted: 12/22/2023] [Indexed: 01/14/2024]
Abstract
Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) represents 18% to 25% of all diagnosed breast cancers, and is a noninvasive, nonobligate precursor lesion to invasive cancer. The diagnosis of DCIS represents a wide range of disease, including lesions with both low and high risk of progression to invasive cancer and recurrence. Over the past decade, research on the topic of DCIS has focused on the possibility of tailoring treatment for patients according to their risk for progression and recurrence, which is based on clinicopathologic, biomolecular and genetic factors. These efforts are ongoing, with recently completed and continuing clinical trials spanning the continuum of cancer care. We conducted a review to identify recent advances on the topic of diagnosis, risk stratification and management of DCIS. While novel imaging techniques have increased the rate of DCIS diagnosis, questions persist regarding the optimal management of lesions that would not be identified with conventional methods. Additionally, among trials investigating the potential for omission of surgery and use of active surveillance, 2 trials have completed accrual and 2 clinical trials are continuing to enroll patients. Identification of novel genetic patterns is expanding our potential for risk stratification and aiding our ability to de-escalate radiation and systemic therapies for DCIS. These advances provide hope for tailoring of DCIS treatment in the near future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna T Buchheit
- Northwestern Quality Improvement, Research, & Education in Surgery (NQUIRES), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - David Schacht
- Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Swati A Kulkarni
- Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL; Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL.
| |
Collapse
|