Unresectable biliary tract cancer: Current and future systemic therapy

Biliary tract cancer

BACKGROUND

Biliary tract cancers comprise a heterogeneous collection of malignancies usually described as cholangiocarcinoma of the intra- or extrahepatic bile duct, including perihilar cholangiocarcinoma and gallbladder cancer.

METHODS

A review of pertinent parts of the ESSO core curriculum for the UEMS diploma targets (Fellowships exam, EBSQ), based on updated and available guidelines for diagnosis, surgical treatment and oncological management of cholangiocarcinoma.

RESULTS

Following the outline from the ESSO core curriculum we present the epidemiology and risk factors for cholangiocarcinoma, as well as the rationale for the current diagnosis, staging, (neo-)adjuvant treatment, surgical management, and short- and long-term outcomes. The available guidelines and consensus reports (i.e. NCCN, BGS and ESMO guidelines) are referred to. Recognition of biliary tract cancers as separate entities of the intrahepatic biliary ducts, the perihilar and distal bile duct as well as the gallbladder is important for proper management, as they each provide distinct clinical, molecular and treatment profiles to consider.

CONCLUSION

Core competencies in knowledge to the diagnosis, management and outcomes of biliary tract cancers are presented.

Genomic landscape of biliary tract cancer and corresponding targeted treatment strategies

Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) are classified on the basis of their anatomical origin, and the feasibility of surgical resection depends on the tumor location and extent of progression. However, for unresectable BTCs, systemic therapy has been uniformly applied. Gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) therapy and GC-based therapies were established as the first-line standard BTC treatment. However, no highly effective second-line therapy has been established, and the prognosis remains poor, highlighting the need for further therapeutic advancements. Meanwhile, the era of precision medicine has expanded the use of genetic testing, leading to the identification of actionable molecular targets in BTC. Several targeted therapies, including FGFR inhibitors and IDH1 inhibitors, have been developed, offering new second-line treatment options and the potential for first-line use in appropriate cases. Notably, the frequency of these genetic alterations varies depending on the tumor location, demonstrating the molecular heterogeneity of BTC. Therefore, it has been recognized that a tailored treatment approach for each BTC patient may be more effective than uniform systemic therapy. Consequently, although routine genetic testing before initiating systemic treatment is currently limited by the medical environment (e.g., cost, accessibility, regional differences), it is recommended in ESMO guideline and might be increasingly advocated. However, BTC harbors a wide range of genetic alterations, and numerous targeted therapies are being developed accordingly. This review provides an overview of the reported genetic alterations in BTC, the frequencies of these alterations, and the corresponding targeted therapies, emphasizing the evolving role of precision medicine in BTC treatment.

Durvalumab plus chemotherapy in advanced biliary tract cancer: 3-year overall survival update from the phase III TOPAZ-1 study

BACKGROUND

At the TOPAZ-1 (NCT03875235) primary analysis, durvalumab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin (GemCis) significantly improved overall survival (OS) in advanced biliary tract cancer (aBTC). We report updated exploratory analyses of OS and safety, characterisation of extended long-term survivors (eLTS), and subsequent anticancer therapy (SAT) use.

METHODS

Participants with aBTC received durvalumab+GemCis or placebo+GemCis every 3 weeks (≤8 cycles), then durvalumab or placebo monotherapy every 4 weeks until progressive disease or other discontinuation criteria were met. OS and serious adverse events (SAEs) were assessed in the full analysis and safety analysis sets (FAS/SAS), respectively. eLTS outcomes were assessed (FAS participants alive ≥30 months after randomisation).

RESULTS

685 participants were randomised: durvalumab+GemCis (n = 341); placebo+GemCis (n = 344). After a median 41.3 (95% confidence interval [CI] 39.3-44.1) months' follow-up in all participants, median OS (95% CI) for durvalumab+GemCis versus placebo+GemCis was 12.9 (11.6-14.1) versus 11.3 (10.1-12.5) months (hazard ratio, 0.74 [95% CI 0.63-0.87]); 36-month OS rate was 14.6% versus 6.9%, respectively. In participants who achieved disease control (566/685; 82.6%), the 36-month OS rate was higher for durvalumab+GemCis (17.0%) versus placebo+GemCis (7.6%). Overall, 12.8% were eLTS, with more eLTS in the durvalumab+GemCis (17.0%) versus placebo+GemCis (8.7%) arms; eLTS included all clinically relevant subgroups. Durvalumab+GemCis improved OS regardless of SAT use. In eLTS, SAEs were comparable between arms and less frequent than in the full SAS.

CONCLUSIONS

Survival benefit and manageable safety continued with durvalumab+GemCis versus placebo+GemCis approximately 3 years after the last participant was randomised. All clinically relevant subgroups were represented in eLTS, supporting standard-of-care status for durvalumab+GemCis in aBTC.

LAY SUMMARY

The TOPAZ-1 study found that treatment with durvalumab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin (chemotherapy, also known as GemCis), helped people with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) to live longer on average than those treated with a placebo plus GemCis. The latest results from TOPAZ-1 showed that these benefits continued for over 3 years in participants treated with durvalumab plus GemCis and side effects continued to be manageable. At an updated analysis, carried out 3 years after the last participant started the study, twice as many participants treated with durvalumab plus GemCis were alive compared to those treated with placebo plus GemCis. Results also showed that the positive effect of durvalumab plus GemCis compared with placebo plus GemCis was not affected by the use of other therapies some participants received after they finished the study treatment. These results continue to support durvalumab plus GemCis as a standard first-line treatment for people with advanced BTC.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03875235; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03875235.

SENP3 induced HADHA deSUMOylation enhances intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma chemotherapy sensitivity via fatty acid oxidation

Chemoresistance contributes to poor outcomes in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). This study aimed to explore the mechanisms underlying chemotherapy resistance and to develop strategies that can sensitize the chemotherapy. Patient derived organoids (PDOs) drug screening and Lipidomics profiling were performed to investigate the chemoresistance mechanism. Through multi-strategy analysis, we found that SENP3 enhanced chemotherapy sensitivity in a SUMO system dependent manner. Mechanistically, chemotherapy resistance increased METTL3 expression, which regulated SENP3 mRNA stability through YTHDF2-dependent m6A methylation modifications. SENP3 interacted with HADHA and catalyzed its deSUMOylation at two lysine residues. Specifically, SUMOylation and ubiquitination exhibited crosstalk at the same modification sites on HADHA, influencing its protein stability and, consequently, regulating fatty acid oxidation (FAO) levels. The physical interaction of SENP3, HADHA, and USP10 provides a novel molecular mechanism for the abnormal activation of FAO pathway. The lipid metabolism-targeting drug could be a promising therapeutic strategy for sensitizing ICC to chemotherapy.

IDHIRA: a prospective, observational study on ivosidenib in patients with IDH1 R132-mutated advanced cholangiocarcinoma

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

www.clinicaltrials.gov identifier is NCT06607302.

Mapping of the T-cell Landscape of Biliary Tract Cancer Unravels Anatomic Subtype-Specific Heterogeneity

Biliary tract cancer (BTC), encompassing diseases such as intrahepatic (ICC), extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ECC), and gallbladder cancer, is not only increasing but also poses a significant and urgent health threat due to its high malignancy. Genomic differences point to the possibility that these subtypes represent distinct diseases. Elucidation of the specific distribution of T-cell subsets, critical to cancer immunity, across these diseases could provide better insights into the unique biology of BTC subtypes and help identify potential precision medicine strategies. To address this, we conducted single-cell RNA sequencing and T-cell receptor sequencing on CD3+ T cells from 36 samples from 16 patients with BTC across all subtypes and analyzed 355 pathologic slides to examine the spatial distribution of T cells and tertiary lymphoid structures. Compared with ICC and gallbladder cancer, ECC possessed a unique immune profile characterized by T-cell exhaustion, elevated CXCL13 expression in CD4+ T helper-like and CD8+CXCL13+ exhausted T cells, more mature tertiary lymphoid structures, and fewer desert immunophenotypes. Conversely, ICC displayed an inflamed immunophenotype with an enrichment of IFN-related pathways and high expression of LGALS1 in activated regulatory T cells, associated with immunosuppression. Inhibition of LGALS1 reduced tumor growth and regulatory T-cell prevalence in ICC mouse models. Overall, this study unveils T-cell diversity across BTC subtypes at the single-cell and spatial level that could open paths for tailored immunotherapies. Significance: Single-cell and spatial analyses detailed the T-cell characteristics specific to anatomic subtypes of biliary tract cancer, identifying unique immunologic features that could potentially be harnessed to improve patient outcomes.

Identification of PANoptosis-relevant subgroups and predicting signature to evaluate the prognosis and immune landscape of patients with biliary tract cancer

BACKGROUND

This study conducted molecular subtyping of biliary tract cancer patients based on 19 PANoptosis-related gene signatures.

METHODS

Through consensus clustering, patients were categorized into two subtypes, A and B. By integrating multi-omics data and clinical information from different cohorts, we elucidated the association between different subtypes of biliary tract cancer and patient prognosis, which correlated with the immune infiltration characteristics of patients.

RESULTS

LASSO regression analysis was performed on the 19 gene signatures, and we constructed and validated a 9-gene risk score prognostic model that accurately predicts the overall survival rate of different biliary tract cancer patients. Additionally, we developed a predictive nomogram demonstrating the clinical utility and robustness of our model. Further analysis of the risk score-based immune landscape highlighted potential associations with immune cell infiltration, chemotherapy, and immune therapy response.

CONCLUSION

Our study provides valuable insights into personalized treatment strategies for biliary tract cancer, which are crucial for improving patient prognosis and guiding treatment decisions in clinical practice.

Superior survival benefits of triple combination immunotherapy compared to standard chemotherapy as second-line treatment for advanced biliary tract cancer: a retrospective analysis

Background

Advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) is associated with a poor prognosis and limited options for second-line treatment. The TOPAZ-1 and KEYNOTE-966 trials have demonstrated the benefits of combining immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with chemotherapy in treating BTC. However, the efficacy of FOLFOX as a second-line therapy is limited, highlighting the need for more effective treatment approaches.

Methods

This retrospective study compared a triple regimen-comprising ICIs, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and chemotherapy-to standard chemotherapy in patients with metastatic BTC who had progressed on first-line gemcitabine-based therapy. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), with secondary endpoints including overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety.

Results

Of the 121 patients, 86 received the triple regimen and 35 received standard chemotherapy. The triple regimen showed a significantly higher ORR (37.2% vs. 2.8%, p < 0.0001) and DCR (89.5% vs. 71.4%). The median PFS was 6 months for the triple regimen compared to 2.0 months for standard chemotherapy (HR 0.29, p < 0.0001). The median OS was 16.0 months for the triple regimen versus 6.0 months for standard chemotherapy (HR 0.35, p < 0.0001). Treatment-related adverse events were comparable between the groups.

Conclusion

The triple combination of immunotherapy offers superior survival benefits compared to standard chemotherapy as a second-line treatment for advanced BTC, warranting further investigation for potential clinical adoption.

Traditional Chinese medicine for the treatment of cancers of hepatobiliary system: from clinical evidence to drug discovery

Hepatic, biliary, and pancreatic cancer pose significant challenges in the field of digestive system diseases due to their highly malignant nature. Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) has gained attention as a potential therapeutic approach with long-standing use in China and well-recognized clinical benefits. In this review, we systematically summarized the clinical applications of TCM that have shown promising results in clinical trials in treating hepatic, biliary, and pancreatic cancer. We highlighted several commonly used TCM therapeutics with validated efficacy through rigorous clinical trials, including Huaier Granule, Huachansu, and Icaritin. The active compounds and their potential targets have been thoroughly elucidated to offer valuable insights into the potential of TCM for anti-cancer drug discovery. We emphasized the importance of further research to bridge the gap between TCM and modern oncology, facilitating the development of evidence-based TCM treatment for these challenging malignancies.

The Recent Trends of Systemic Treatments and Locoregional Therapies for Cholangiocarcinoma

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a hepatic malignancy that has a rapidly increasing incidence. CCA is anatomically classified into intrahepatic (iCCA) and extrahepatic (eCCA), which is further divided into perihilar (pCCA) and distal (dCCA) subtypes, with higher incidence rates in Asia. Despite its rarity, CCA has a low 5-year survival rate and remains the leading cause of primary liver tumor-related death over the past 10-20 years. The systemic therapy section discusses gemcitabine-based regimens as primary treatments, along with oxaliplatin-based options. Second-line therapy is limited but may include short-term infusional fluorouracil (FU) plus leucovorin (LV) and oxaliplatin. The adjuvant therapy section discusses approaches to improve overall survival (OS) post-surgery. However, only a minority of CCA patients qualify for surgical resection. In comparison to adjuvant therapies, neoadjuvant therapy for unresectable cases shows promise. Gemcitabine and cisplatin indicate potential benefits for patients awaiting liver transplantation. The addition of immunotherapies to chemotherapy in combination is discussed. Nivolumab and innovative approaches like CAR-T cells, TRBAs, and oncolytic viruses are explored. We aim in this review to provide a comprehensive report on the systemic and locoregional therapies for CCA.