Understanding cancer stem cells and plasticity: Towards better therapeutics

Stemness regulation in prostate cancer: prostate cancer stem cells and targeted therapy

BACKGROUND

Increasing evidence indicates that cancer stem cells (CSCs) and cancer stem-like cells form a special subpopulation of cells that are ubiquitous in tumors. These cells exhibit similar characteristics to those of normal stem cells in tissues; moreover, they are capable of self-renewal and differentiation, as well as high tumorigenicity and drug resistance. In prostate cancer (PCa), it is difficult to kill these cells using androgen signaling inhibitors and chemotherapy drugs. Consequently, the residual prostate cancer stem cells (PCSCs) mediate tumor recurrence and progression.

OBJECTIVE

This review aims to provide a comprehensive and up-to-date overview of PCSCs, with a particular emphasis on potential therapeutic strategies targeting these cells.

METHODS

After searching in PubMed and Embase databases using 'prostate cancer' and 'cancer stem cells' as keywords, studies related were compiled and examined.

RESULTS

In this review, we detail the origin and characteristics of PCSCs, introduce the regulatory pathways closely related to CSC survival and stemness maintenance, and discuss the link between epithelial-mesenchymal transition, tumor microenvironment and tumor stemness. Furthermore, we introduce the currently available therapeutic strategies targeting CSCs, including signaling pathway inhibitors, anti-apoptotic protein inhibitors, microRNAs, nanomedicine, and immunotherapy. Lastly, we summarize the limitations of current CSC research and mention future research directions.

CONCLUSION

A deeper understanding of the regulatory network and molecular markers of PCSCs could facilitate the development of novel therapeutic strategies targeting these cells. Previous preclinical studies have demonstrated the potential of this treatment approach. In the future, this may offer alternative treatment options for PCa patients.

Multifaceted roles of OCT4 in tumor microenvironment: biology and therapeutic implications

OCT4 (Octamer-binding transcription factor 4, encoded by the POU5F1 gene) is a master transcription factor for maintaining the self-renewal and pluripotency of pluripotent stem cells, as well as a pioneer factor regulating epigenetics-driven cell reprogramming and cell fate conversion. It is also detected in a variety of cancer tissues and particularly in a small subpopulation of cancer cells known as cancer stem cells (CSCs). Accumulating evidence has revealed that CSCs are a dynamic population, exhibiting shift between multipotency and differentiation states, or quiescence and proliferation states. Such cellular plasticity of CSCs is profoundly influenced by dynamic interplay between CSCs and the tumor microenvironment (TME). Here, we review recent evidence showing that OCT4 expressed in CSCs plays a multifaceted role in shaping the TME by interacting with the cellular TME components, including cancer-associated fibroblasts, tumor endothelial cells, tumor-infiltrating immune cells, as well as the non-cellular TME components, such as extracellular matrix (ECM), metabolites, soluble factors (e.g., growth factors, cytokines and chemokines), and intra-tumoral microbiota. Together, OCT4 regulates crucial processes encompassing ECM remodeling, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, metabolic reprogramming, angiogenesis, and immune responses. The complex and bidirectional interactions between OCT4-expressing CSCs and the TME create a supportive niche for tumor growth, invasion, and resistance to therapy. Better understanding OCT4's roles in such interactions can provide deeper insights into potential therapeutic strategies and targets for disrupting the supportive environment of tumors. The emerging therapies targeting OCT4 in CSCs might hold promise to resensitize therapeutic-resistant cancer cells, and to eradicate all cancer cells when combined with other therapies targeting the bulk of differentiated cancer cells as well as the TME.

Targeting Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Resistance Mechanisms and Therapeutic Advancements

BACKGROUND

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is one of the most heterogeneous and menacing forms of breast cancer, with no sustainable cure available in the current treatment landscape. Its lack of targets makes it highly unresponsive to various treatment modalities, which is why chemotherapy continues to be the primary form of treatment, despite the high rates of patients developing chemoresistance. In recent years, however, there has been significant progress in identifying and understanding the role of several aspects that might contribute to genomic instability and other hallmarks of cancer, including cellular proteins, immune targets, and epigenetic mechanisms, which are desirable as they permit reversibility easier than the often-adamant genetic changes.

METHODS

A literature review was conducted on the role of various TNBC associated biomarkers, their therapeutic applications, and their role in tumorigenesis and tumor maintenance, with a focus on linking both the driving biological mechanisms and emerging treatment options for TNBC.

CONCLUSIONS

Shifting the focus of treatment to identify crucial tumor cell subpopulations and associated biomarkers, such as local immune cell populations and cancer stem cells, could potentially solve or simplify decades' worth of problems that are associated with TNBC, bolstering early detection and the evolution of precision medicine and treatment. The techniques that can be used here are epigenetic analysis and RNA sequencing. Biomarkers, such as PD-L1, survivin, and ABC transporters, are implicated in several crucial processes that maintain tumors, such as cell proliferation, metastasis, immunosuppression, and stemness. Complex treatment options such as, immunotherapy, pathway inhibition, PARP inhibition, virotherapy, and RNA targeting have been considered for TNBC. Phytochemicals are also being considered as a treatment modality for TNBC, as a supplement to chemotherapy and radiation therapy, or as sole treatment.

Mechanisms of breast cancer metastasis: the role of extracellular matrix

The components of the extracellular matrix (ECM) are dynamic, and they mediate mechanical signals that modulate cellular behaviors. Disruption of the ECM can induce the migration and invasion of cancer cells via specific signaling pathways and cytokines. Metastasis is a leading cause of high mortality in malignancies, and early intervention can improve survival rates. However, breast cancer is frequently diagnosed subsequent to metastasis, resulting in poor prognosis and distant metastasis poses substantial hurdles in therapy. In breast cancer, there is notable tissue remodeling of ECM proteins, with several identified as essential components for metastasis. Moreover, specific ECM molecules, receptors, enzymes, and various signaling pathways play crucial roles in breast cancer metastasis, drug treatment, and resistance. The in-depth consideration of these elements could provide potential therapeutic targets to enhance the survival rates and quality of life for breast cancer patients. This review explores the mechanisms by which alterations in the ECM contribute to breast cancer metastasis and discusses current clinical applications targeting ECM in breast cancer treatment, offering valuable perspectives for future ECM-based therapies.

Proteomic-based stemness score measures oncogenic dedifferentiation and enables the identification of druggable targets

Cancer progression and therapeutic resistance are closely linked to a stemness phenotype. Here, we introduce a protein-expression-based stemness index (PROTsi) to evaluate oncogenic dedifferentiation in relation to histopathology, molecular features, and clinical outcomes. Utilizing datasets from the Clinical Proteomic Tumor Analysis Consortium across 11 tumor types, we validate PROTsi's effectiveness in accurately quantifying stem-like features. Through integration of PROTsi with multi-omics, including protein post-translational modifications, we identify molecular features associated with stemness and proteins that act as active nodes within transcriptional networks, driving tumor aggressiveness. Proteins highly correlated with stemness were identified as potential drug targets, both shared and tumor specific. These stemness-associated proteins demonstrate predictive value for clinical outcomes, as confirmed by immunohistochemistry in multiple samples. The findings emphasize PROTsi's efficacy as a valuable tool for selecting predictive protein targets, a crucial step in customizing anti-cancer therapy and advancing the clinical development of cures for cancer patients.

An update understanding of stemness and chemoresistance of prostate cancer

INTRODUCTION

Globally, prostate cancer (CaP) is a leading cause of death and disability among men and a substantial public health burden. Despite advancements in cancer treatment, chemoresistance remains a significant issue in cancer therapy, accounting for the majority of patient relapses and poor survival. Cancer stem cells (CSCs) are considered the main cause of cancer recurrence, chemoresistance, and poor survival of patients. These CSCs acquire stemness and chemoresistance by certain mechanisms such as enhanced DNA repair processes, increased expression of drug efflux pumps, resistance to apoptosis, and altered cell cycle and tumor microenvironment (TME).

AREA COVERED

We cover the latest developments in this field and give an overview of future research directions.

EXPERT OPINION

CSCs show dysregulation of several signaling pathways, mostly related to conferring chemoresistance phenotype, such as high drug efflux, apoptotic resistance, quiescent cell cycle, tumor microenvironment, and DNA repair. There are several research articles published on this topic. However, still, this field warrants further investigations to identify the therapeutic molecule that can either chemosensitize CSCs or kill them effectively. This can only be possible when we know the complete mechanisms to comprehend the fundamental causes of cancer stemness and therapy resistance.

The molecular features of lung cancer stem cells in dedifferentiation process-driven epigenetic alterations

Cancer stem cells (CSCs) may be dedifferentiated somatic cells following oncogenic processes, representing a subpopulation of cells able to promote tumor growth with their capacities for proliferation and self-renewal, inducing lineage heterogeneity, which may be a main cause of resistance to therapies. It has been shown that the "less differentiated process" may have an impact on tumor plasticity, particularly when non-CSCs may dedifferentiate and become CSC-like. Bidirectional interconversion between CSCs and non-CSCs has been reported in other solid tumors, where the inflammatory stroma promotes cell reprogramming by enhancing Wnt signaling through nuclear factor kappa B activation in association with intracellular signaling, which may induce cells' pluripotency, the oncogenic transformation can be considered another important aspect in the acquisition of "new" development programs with oncogenic features. During cell reprogramming, mutations represent an initial step toward dedifferentiation, in which tumor cells switch from a partially or terminally differentiated stage to a less differentiated stage that is mainly manifested by re-entry into the cell cycle, acquisition of a stem cell-like phenotype, and expression of stem cell markers. This phenomenon typically shows up as a change in the form, function, and pattern of gene and protein expression, and more specifically, in CSCs. This review would highlight the main epigenetic alterations, major signaling pathways and driver mutations in which CSCs, in tumors and specifically, in lung cancer, could be involved, acting as key elements in the differentiation/dedifferentiation process. This would highlight the main molecular mechanisms which need to be considered for more tailored therapies.

Cell-cell fusion in cancer: The next cancer hallmark?

In this review, we consider the role of cell-cell fusion in cancer development and progression through an evolutionary lens. We begin by summarizing the origins of fusion proteins (fusogens), of which there are many distinct classes that have evolved through convergent evolution. We then use an evolutionary framework to highlight how the persistence of fusion over generations and across different organisms can be attributed to traits that increase fitness secondary to fusion; these traits map well to the expanded hallmarks of cancer. By studying the tumor microenvironment, we can begin to identify the key selective pressures that may favor higher rates of fusion compared to healthy tissues. The paper concludes by discussing the increasing number of research questions surrounding fusion, recommendations for how to answer them, and the need for a greater interest in exploring cell fusion and evolutionary principles in oncology moving forward.

Novel Anti-Cancer Stem Cell Compounds: A Comprehensive Review

Cancer stem cells (CSCs) possess a significant ability to renew themselves, which gives them a strong capacity to form tumors and expand to encompass additional body areas. In addition, they possess inherent resistance to chemotherapy and radiation therapies used to treat many forms of cancer. Scientists have focused on investigating the signaling pathways that are highly linked to the ability of CSCs to renew themselves and maintain their stem cell properties. The pathways encompassed are Notch, Wnt/β-catenin, hedgehog, STAT3, NF-κB, PI-3K/Akt/mTOR, sirtuin, ALDH, MDM2, and ROS. Recent studies indicate that directing efforts towards CSC cells is essential in eradicating the overall cancer cell population and reducing the likelihood of tumor metastasis. As our comprehension of the mechanisms that stimulate CSC activity, growth, and resistance to chemotherapy advances, the discovery of therapeutic drugs specifically targeting CSCs, such as small-molecule compounds, holds the potential to revolutionize cancer therapy. This review article examines and analyzes the novel anti-CSC compounds that have demonstrated effective and selective targeting of pathways associated with the renewal and stemness of CSCs. We also discussed their special drug metabolism and absorption mechanisms. CSCs have been the subject of much study in cancer biology. As a possible treatment for malignancies, small-molecule drugs that target CSCs are gaining more and more attention. This article provides a comprehensive review of the current state of key small-molecule compounds, summarizes their recent developments, and anticipates the future discovery of even more potent and targeted compounds, opening up new avenues for cancer treatment.

Dual-responsive near-infrared turn-on fluorescent probe for cancer stem cell-specific visualization

Aldehyde dehydrogenase 1A1 (ALDH1A1) stands out as one of the most reliable intracellular biomarkers for stem cells because it is expressed in both cancer stem cells (CSCs) and normal somatic stem cells (NSCs). Although several turn-on fluorescent probes for ALDH1A1 have been developed to visualize CSCs in cancer cells, the discrimination of CSCs from NSCs is difficult. We here report an AND-type dual-responsive fluorescent probe, CHO_βgal, the near-infrared fluorescence of which can be turned on after responding to both ALDH1A1 and β-galactosidase. The AND-type dual responsiveness enables CSCs to be clearly visualized, whereas NSCs are non-emissive in microscopy. CSC-positive metastasis model lungs were successfully discriminated from normal lungs in ex vivo staining experiments using CHO_βgal, whereas the single-input ALDH1A1-responsive probe failed to achieve this discrimination owing to pronounced false-positive fluorescence output from lung NSCs. In tissue slice staining experiments, even in the presence of adjacent normal tissues, the peripheral region-specific localization of CSCs was clear. The versatility of CHO_βgal holds promise not only as a fundamental in vitro research tool for visualizing CSCs but also as a valuable asset in practical tissue staining diagnosis, significantly contributing to the assessment of cancer malignancy.

Identification of a set of genes potentially responsible for resistance to ferroptosis in lung adenocarcinoma cancer stem cells

Scientific literature supports the evidence that cancer stem cells (CSCs) retain inside low reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels and are, therefore, less susceptible to cell death, including ferroptosis, a type of cell death dependent on iron-driven lipid peroxidation. A collection of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) primary cell lines derived from malignant pleural effusions (MPEs) of patients was used to obtain 3D spheroids enriched for stem-like properties. We observed that the ferroptosis inducer RSL3 triggered lipid peroxidation and cell death in LUAD cells when grown in 2D conditions; however, when grown in 3D conditions, all cell lines underwent a phenotypic switch, exhibiting substantial resistance to RSL3 and, therefore, protection against ferroptotic cell death. Interestingly, this phenomenon was reversed by disrupting 3D cells and growing them back in adherence, supporting the idea of CSCs plasticity, which holds that cancer cells have the dynamic ability to transition between a CSC state and a non-CSC state. Molecular analyses showed that ferroptosis resistance in 3D spheroids correlated with an increased expression of antioxidant genes and high levels of proteins involved in iron storage and export, indicating protection against oxidative stress and low availability of iron for the initiation of ferroptosis. Moreover, transcriptomic analyses highlighted a novel subset of genes commonly modulated in 3D spheroids and potentially capable of driving ferroptosis protection in LUAD-CSCs, thus allowing to better understand the mechanisms of CSC-mediated drug resistance in tumors.

Cancer cell plasticity, stem cell factors, and therapy resistance: how are they linked?

Cellular plasticity can occur naturally in an organism and is considered an adapting mechanism during the developmental stage. However, abnormal cellular plasticity is observed in different diseased conditions, including cancer. Cancer cell plasticity triggers the stimuli of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), abnormal epigenetic changes, expression of stem cell factors and implicated signaling pathways, etc., and helps in the maintenance of CSC phenotype. Conversely, CSC maintains the cancer cell plasticity, EMT, and epigenetic plasticity. EMT contributes to increased cell migration and greater diversity within tumors, while epigenetic changes, stem cell factors (OCT4, NANOG, and SOX2), and various signaling pathways allow cancer cells to maintain various phenotypes, giving rise to intra- and inter-tumoral heterogeneity. The intricate relationships between cancer cell plasticity and stem cell factors help the tumor cells adopt drug-tolerant states, evade senescence, and successfully acquire drug resistance with treatment dismissal. Inhibiting molecules/signaling pathways involved in promoting CSCs, cellular plasticity, EMT, and epigenetic plasticity might be helpful for successful cancer therapy management. This review discussed the role of cellular plasticity, EMT, and stem cell factors in tumor initiation, progression, reprogramming, and therapy resistance. Finally, we discussed how the intervention in this axis will help better manage cancers and improve patient survivability.

Plasticity and resistance of cancer stem cells as a challenge for innovative anticancer therapies - do we know enough to overcome this?

According to the CSC hypothesis, cancer stem cells are pivotal in initiating, developing, and causing cancer recurrence. Since the identification of CSCs in leukemia, breast cancer, glioblastoma, and colorectal cancer in the 1990s, researchers have actively investigated the origin and biology of CSCs. However, the CSC hypothesis and the role of these cells in tumor development model is still in debate. These cells exhibit distinct surface markers, are capable of self-renewal, demonstrate unrestricted proliferation, and display metabolic adaptation. CSC phenotypic plasticity and the capacity to EMT is strictly connected to the stemness state. CSCs show high resistance to chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and immunotherapy. The plasticity of CSCs is significantly influenced by tumor microenvironment factors, such as hypoxia. Targeting the genetic and epigenetic changes of cancer cells, together with interactions with the tumor microenvironment, presents promising avenues for therapeutic strategies. See also the Graphical abstract(Fig. 1).

Mechanisms of Melanoma Progression and Treatment Resistance: Role of Cancer Stem-like Cells

Melanoma is the third most common type of skin cancer, characterized by its heterogeneity and propensity to metastasize to distant organs. Melanoma is a heterogeneous tumor, composed of genetically divergent subpopulations, including a small fraction of melanoma-initiating cancer stem-like cells (CSCs) and many non-cancer stem cells (non-CSCs). CSCs are characterized by their unique surface proteins associated with aberrant signaling pathways with a causal or consequential relationship with tumor progression, drug resistance, and recurrence. Melanomas also harbor significant alterations in functional genes (BRAF, CDKN2A, NRAS, TP53, and NF1). Of these, the most common are the BRAF and NRAS oncogenes, with 50% of melanomas demonstrating the BRAF mutation (BRAFV600E). While the successful targeting of BRAFV600E does improve overall survival, the long-term efficacy of available therapeutic options is limited due to adverse side effects and reduced clinical efficacy. Additionally, drug resistance develops rapidly via mechanisms involving fast feedback re-activation of MAPK signaling pathways. This article updates information relevant to the mechanisms of melanoma progression and resistance and particularly the mechanistic role of CSCs in melanoma progression, drug resistance, and recurrence.