Incidence of endocrine and exocrine insufficiency in patients with autoimmune pancreatitis at diagnosis and after treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Defining pancreatic damage and symptom burden in IgG4-related autoimmune pancreatitis: A cross-sectional study of 118 patients from a single-center registry

OBJECTIVES

Type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis is a common manifestation of IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD). However, there is a paucity of literature characterizing pancreatic damage and symptom burden in IgG4-RD.

METHODS

We performed a cross-sectional analysis of patients who fulfilled the ACR/EULAR IgG4-RD Classification Criteria. Disease features and complications were collected by medical record review. A survey regarding symptoms and disease history was distributed to all patients. Characteristics were compared between patients with and without autoimmune pancreatitis.

RESULTS

Of 303 patients who fulfilled Classification Criteria at the time of the chart review, 118 (39 %) had evidence of autoimmune pancreatitis. Overt indicators of acute pancreatitis (e.g., abdominal pain, nausea/emesis, elevated serum lipase) each occurred in fewer than 50 % of patients with autoimmune pancreatitis. Diabetes mellitus (DM), exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI), or both were present in 47 %, 48 %, and 21 % of the autoimmune pancreatitis patients, respectively. After encouraging all patients to have fecal elastase measured, 40/49 (82 %) stool samples had low elastase concentrations. 9/118 (8 %) had undergone pancreatic resections before the diagnosis was established. 162/325 (50 %) completed surveys (n = 81 [50 %] with autoimmune pancreatitis). Patients with autoimmune pancreatitis reported a higher burden of abdominal pain, weight loss, and changes in stool than those without (all p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Despite an often subclinical presentation, autoimmune pancreatitis is associated with EPI, DM, or both in a high percentage of patients with IgG4-RD. While symptomatic acute pancreatitis may not be common, patient-reported symptom burden due to IgG4-related autoimmune pancreatitis or its complications is greater than previously appreciated.

Pediatric Autoimmune Pancreatitis: Clinical Findings and Outcomes in Sweden

Introduction

Pediatric autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is a rare form of pancreatitis in children with poorly understood pathophysiology. It is a recognized risk factor for chronic pancreatitis in approximately 4% of pediatric cases. This study aims to describe the demographics, clinical characteristics, and outcomes of a large Swedish cohort of pediatric AIP patients.

Patients and Methods

A retrospective analysis of medical records was conducted for patients diagnosed with pediatric AIP between January 2006 and December 2022.

Results

Thirty‐seven patients were included (20 males, 17 females; mean age 13.5 ± 2.8 years). None had a family history of pancreatic diseases. Most patients (62.2%) presented with acute pancreatitis, followed by weight loss (45.9%), abdominal pain (43.2%), jaundice (21.6%), and fatigue (16.2%). Acute pancreatitis was mild in all cases according to the Atlanta criteria. Multi‐organ involvement was observed in 81.1% of patients, and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) was present in 62.2%. A total of 75.7% of patients received treatment, mainly glucocorticoids, while 24.3% had spontaneous regression. Complete clinical and radiological remission was achieved in 83.8% of treated patients. Pancreatic exocrine insufficiency was present in 43.2% of patients at diagnosis, reducing to 24.3% at the final follow‐up. No patients developed diabetes mellitus, except for one who underwent total pancreatectomy due to suspected pancreatic tumor.

Conclusions

Pediatric AIP is a rare condition often associated with multi‐organ involvement particularly IBD. Most patients respond well to glucocorticoid treatment and achieve remission. Managing IBD may improve the outcomes for both conditions.

Inebilizumab for Treatment of IgG4-Related Disease

BACKGROUND

IgG4-related disease is a multiorgan, relapsing, fibroinflammatory, immune-mediated disorder with no approved therapy. Inebilizumab targets and depletes CD19+ B cells and may be effective for treating patients with IgG4-related disease.

METHODS

In this phase 3, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, adults with active IgG4-related disease underwent randomization in a 1:1 ratio to receive inebilizumab (300-mg intravenous infusions on days 1 and 15 and week 26) or placebo for a 52-week treatment period. Participants in both groups received identical glucocorticoid tapers. Glucocorticoids were allowed to treat disease flares, but background immunosuppressants were not permitted. The primary end point was the first treated, adjudicated disease flare during the treatment period, assessed in a time-to-event analysis. Key secondary end points were the annualized flare rate and treatment-free and glucocorticoid-free complete remission.

RESULTS

A total of 135 participants with IgG4-related disease underwent randomization: 68 participants were assigned to receive inebilizumab and 67 were assigned to receive placebo. Treatment with inebilizumab reduced flare risk; 7 participants (10%) in the inebilizumab group had at least one flare, as compared with 40 participants (60%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.06 to 0.28; P<0.001). The annualized flare rate was lower with inebilizumab than with placebo (rate ratio, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.06 to 0.31; P<0.001). More participants in the inebilizumab group than in the placebo group had flare-free, treatment-free complete remission (odds ratio, 4.68; 95% CI, 2.21 to 9.91; P<0.001) and flare-free, glucocorticoid-free complete remission (odds ratio, 4.96; 95% CI, 2.34 to 10.52; P<0.001). Serious adverse events occurred during the treatment period in 12 of the participants (18%) who received inebilizumab and 6 of the participants (9%) who received placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

Inebilizumab reduced the risk of flares of IgG4-related disease and increased the likelihood of flare-free complete remission at 1 year, confirming the role of CD19-targeted B-cell depletion as a potential treatment for IgG4-related disease. (Funded by Amgen; MITIGATE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04540497.).

What Is the Latest in Autoimmune Pancreatitis

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is a steroid-responsive fibroinflammatory disorder with 2 clinically distinct subtypes known as type 1 autoimmune and type 2 autoimmune pancreatitis. Type 1 AIP is considered the pancreatic manifestation of immunoglobulin G4-related disease, a systemic disease often presenting with other organ involvement. Advances in understanding the unique clinical presentation, imaging findings, histopathology, and clinical course of this relatively uncommon disease have led to international consensus regarding diagnosis and treatment. While corticosteroids remain the mainstay of treatment, several emerging novel therapies have been explored primarily in the context or relapsing and refractory cases.

Avoiding Unnecessary Surgery in Autoimmune Pancreatitis: Lessons From a Four-Patient Case Series and Literature Review

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is an inflammatory disease that may be mistaken for pancreatic cancer, especially when there is a focal lesion in the pancreatic head. It often involves biliary strictures and occasional tumor marker elevations, causing confusion with malignancy. An incomplete assessment might lead to unwarranted surgery for what is actually an inflammatory process. By combining imaging, histopathology, IgG4 measurement, and the clinical response to steroids, physicians can reach the correct diagnosis more reliably. We describe four adults, ages 64 to 84, who had obstructive jaundice, biliary dilation, and imaging findings suggesting a possible pancreatic head tumor. Tumor marker levels varied; some were elevated, while others were unremarkable. In two instances, imaging raised concerns about vascular involvement. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsies showed lymphoplasmacytic inflammation without malignant cells, and all patients had elevated IgG4 levels that decreased with steroid therapy. Each individual underwent endoscopic biliary stenting and began a course of prednisone, leading to a return of normal liver function and improvement in imaging findings. Two required short-term additional stent management for persistent strictures, and three underwent gallbladder removal due to associated disease. All four avoided major pancreatic surgery and had a favorable clinical course. These cases show the importance of a methodical workup that includes IgG4 assessment and biopsy confirmation. Steroid therapy can resolve clinical and radiologic abnormalities once AIP is recognized. This approach spares many patients from extensive operations when their presumed neoplasm is, in reality, an autoimmune condition.

Autoimmune pancreatitis, pancreatic and extrapancreatic cancer (AIPPEAR): a multicentre, retrospective study protocol

INTRODUCTION

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) mainly manifests in two distinct forms with different clinical, serological and prognostic characteristics. Previous studies indicated a higher risk of malignancy in AIP patients compared with the general population. However, a direct comparison of cancer incidence in AIP patients with controls from the general population has not been conducted yet.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This is an international, multicentre, retrospective study on patients diagnosed with AIP after 2005. Retrospective data regarding demography, AIP characteristics and cancer incidence will be extracted from the medical files of AIP patients. The primary outcome is the standardised incidence ratio of any first invasive cancer after AIP diagnosis compared with the general population. The expected number of cancers in the general population will be determined using the 'Cancer Incidence in Five Continents Volume XI' registry. Secondary outcomes are the prevalence of all cancer diagnoses within 12 months prior to AIP diagnosis and AIP features associated with a cancer diagnosis.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study was approved by the ethics committees of the autoimmune pancreatitis, pancreatic and extrapancreatic cancer (AIPPEAR) core group centres (Halle (Saale), Germany; Aalborg, Denmark; Tartu, Estonia; Munich, Germany; Göttingen, Germany; Maribor, Slovenia, with the following reference numbers: 2023-204, 2023-0 29 953, 382 /T-3, 24-0768, 9/7/23, UKC-MB-KME 59/23, respectively). Where required, the study protocol will be reviewed and approved by the ethics committees of participating centres in compliance with local regulations. Data will be stored in an electronic case report form within REDCap. In this context, the AIPPEAR core group will share joint responsibility for the data. All results from this study will be submitted to international, peer-reviewed journals and presented at international conferences.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT06328101.

European guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic exocrine insufficiency: UEG, EPC, EDS, ESPEN, ESPGHAN, ESDO, and ESPCG evidence-based recommendations

Pancreatic exocrine insufficiency (PEI) is defined as a reduction in pancreatic exocrine secretion below the level that allows the normal digestion of nutrients. Pancreatic disease and surgery are the main causes of PEI. However, other conditions and upper gastrointestinal surgery can also affect the digestive function of the pancreas. PEI can cause symptoms of nutritional malabsorption and deficiencies, which affect the quality of life and increase morbidity and mortality. These guidelines were developed following the United European Gastroenterology framework for the development of high-quality clinical guidelines. After a systematic literature review, the evidence was evaluated according to the Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology, as appropriate. Statements and comments were developed by the working groups and voted on using the Delphi method. The diagnosis of PEI should be based on a global assessment of symptoms, nutritional status, and a pancreatic secretion test. Pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (PERT), together with dietary advice and support, are the cornerstones of PEI therapy. PERT is indicated in patients with PEI that is secondary to pancreatic disease, pancreatic surgery, or other metabolic or gastroenterological conditions. Specific recommendations concerning the management of PEI under various clinical conditions are provided based on evidence and expert opinions. This evidence-based guideline summarizes the prevalence, clinical impact, and general diagnostic and therapeutic approaches for PEI, as well as the specifics of PEI in different clinical conditions. Finally, the unmet needs for future research are discussed.

Update on Autoimmune Pancreatitis and IgG4-Related Disease

Autoimmune pancreatitis is an increasingly recognized inflammatory type of subacute pancreatitis; two subtypes of autoimmune pancreatitis have been identified so far: the "lymphoplasmacytic" type 1 variant and the "neutrophilic" type 2 variant. Type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis represents the most common manifestation of IgG4-related disease, a fibro-inflammatory disorder characterized by elevated IgG4 levels in the serum and affected tissues. Type 2 autoimmune pancreatitis is a pancreas-specific disorder that frequently occurs in the context of inflammatory bowel diseases. Due to the complexity of both diseases, a comprehensive work up with imaging, laboratory, and histological studies is required to achieve a diagnosis and rule out malignancies. Glucocorticoids represent the cornerstone of the treatment, often supported by other immunosuppressive drugs in case of steroid intolerance or aggressive disease. Maintenance treatment is often employed in type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis because of the higher relapse rate compared with type 2 autoimmune pancreatitis. In this review, we summarize the key concept of autoimmune pancreatitis, delve into the differential diagnosis between the two subtypes, and cover the recent relevant research findings and pressing unmet needs.

Relationship between pancreatic morphological changes and diabetes in autoimmune pancreatitis: Multimodal medical imaging assessment has important potential

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is a special type of chronic pancreatitis with clinical symptoms of obstructive jaundice and abdominal discomfort; this condition is caused by autoimmunity and marked by pancreatic fibrosis and dysfunction. Previous studies have revealed a close relationship between early pancreatic atrophy and the incidence rate of diabetes in type 1 AIP patients receiving steroid treatment. Shimada et al performed a long-term follow-up study and reported that the pancreatic volume (PV) of these patients initially exponentially decreased but then slowly decreased, which was considered to be an important factor related to diabetes; moreover, serum IgG4 levels were positively correlated with PV during follow-up. In this letter, regarding the original study presented by Shimada et al, we present our insights and discuss how multimodal medical imaging and artificial intelligence can be used to better assess the relationship between pancreatic morphological changes and diabetes in patients with AIP.

Diabetes mellitus in patients with type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis at diagnosis and after corticosteroid therapy

BACKGROUND

A high prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM) coexisting with autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is observed. However, evidence on the circumstances under which corticosteroid therapy (CST) for AIP improves or worsens DM is scarce. This study aimed to demonstrate and identify predictors of DM control under the influence of CST.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with type 1 AIP were enrolled from a prospectively maintained cohort and were classified into three groups according to the chronology in which AIP and DM were diagnosed: pre-existing DM (pDM), concurrent DM (cDM), and non-DM (nDM). The responses of DM to CST were assessed when corticosteroid was ceased or tapered to a maintenance dose and classified as 'improvement' and 'non-improvement' (including 'no change' and 'exacerbation').

RESULTS

Among 101 patients with type 1 AIP, 52 (51.5%) patients were complicated with DM at the time of AIP diagnosis, with 36 patients in the cDM group and 16 patients in the pDM group. The incidences of diffuse pancreatic swelling (72.2%) and pancreatic body/tail involvement (91.7%) were significantly higher in the cDM group than in both the pDM and nDM groups. Of the 52 patients with DM, CST was administered in 48 cases. Multivariate logistic analysis identified that elevated serum gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) level at AIP diagnosis [odds ratio (OR) = 0.032, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.003-0.412, P = 0.008] and pancreatic atrophy after CST (OR = 0.027, 95% CI: 0.003-0.295, P = 0.003) were negatively associated with DM control improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with diffuse pancreatic swelling and pancreatic body/tail involvement in pancreatitis tended to be complicated with cDM at AIP diagnosis. CST exerted a beneficial effect on the clinical course of DM in nearly half of the AIP patients complicated with DM at diagnosis, particularly in those without elevated serum GGT levels at diagnosis and who did not experience pancreatic atrophy after CST.

The effect of steroid therapy on pancreatic exocrine function in autoimmune pancreatitis

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is a steroid-responsive inflammatory disease of the pancreas. Few studies investigated pancreatic exocrine function (PEF) in patients suffering from AIP and no definitive data are available on the effect of steroids in PEF recovery. Aim of the study is the evaluation of severe pancreatic insufficiency (sPEI) prevalence in AIP at clinical onset and after steroid treatment.

METHODS

312 Patients with diagnosis of AIP between January 1st, 2010 and December 31st, 2020 were identified in our prospectively maintained register. Patients with a pre-steroid treatment dosage of fecal elastase-1 (FE-1) were included. Changes in PEF were evaluated in patients with available pre- and post-treatment FE (between 3 and 12 months after steroid).

RESULTS

One-hundred-twenty-four patients were included, with a median FE-1 of 122 (Q1-Q3: 15-379) μg/g at baseline. Fifty-nine (47.6 %) had sPEI (FE-1<100 μg/g). Univariable analysis identified type 1 AIP, radiological involvement of the head of the pancreas (diffuse involvement of the pancreas or focal involvement of the head), weight loss, age and diabetes as associated with a greater risk of sPEI. However, at multivariable analysis, only the involvement of the head of the pancreas was identified as independent risk factor for sPEI. After steroids, mean FE-1 changed from 64 (15-340) to 202 (40-387) μg/g (P = 0.058) and head involvement was the only predictor of improvement of sPEI.

CONCLUSION

The inflammatory involvement of the head of the pancreas is associated with PEF severity, as well as PEF improvement after treatment with steroids in patients with AIP.

Maintenance steroid therapy is associated with decreased risk of malignancy and better prognosis of patients with autoimmune pancreatitis: A multicenter cohort study in Japan

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

The association between autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) and pancreatic cancer (PC) remains controversial. This study aimed to clarify the long-term prognosis and risk of malignancies in AIP patients in Japan.

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study on 1364 patients with type 1 AIP from 20 institutions in Japan. We calculated the standardized incidence ratio (SIR) for malignancies compared to that in the general population. We analyzed factors associated with overall survival, pancreatic exocrine insufficiency, diabetes mellitus, and osteoporosis.

RESULTS

The SIR for all malignancies was increased (1.21 [95 % confidence interval: 1.05-1.41]) in patients with AIP. Among all malignancies, the SIR was highest for PC (3.22 [1.99-5.13]) and increased within 2 years and after 5 years of AIP diagnosis. Steroid use for ≥6 months and ≥50 months increased the risk of subsequent development of diabetes mellitus and osteoporosis, respectively. Age ≥65 years at AIP diagnosis (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.73) and the development of malignancies (HR = 2.63), including PC (HR = 7.81), were associated with a poor prognosis, whereas maintenance steroid therapy was associated with a better prognosis (HR = 0.35) in the multivariate analysis. Maintenance steroid therapy was associated with a better prognosis even after propensity score matching for age and sex.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with AIP are at increased risk of developing malignancy, especially PC. PC is a critical prognostic factor for patients with AIP. Although maintenance steroid therapy negatively impacts diabetes mellitus and osteoporosis, it is associated with decreased cancer risk and improved overall survival.

Association of autoimmune pancreatitis and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm. A retrospective analysis from a tertiary care referral center

BACKGROUND

Autoimmune Pancreatitis (AIP) is a rare chronic inflammatory disease affecting the pancreas. Chronic pancreatic inflammation represents a risk factor for pre-neoplastic conditions such as Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasia (IPMN). Due to the rarity of AIP, the incidence, and clinical features of IPMN occurring in AIP patients remains unknown.

AIMS

In the present study we aimed to explore the relationship between AIP and IPMN and to characterize the clinical features and outcomes of IPMN occurring in the context of AIP.

METHODS

We retrospectively (2008-2020) analyzed the clinical and radiological records of a large single center cohort of patients with AIP and investigated the prevalence of IPMN. We then compared the clinical, laboratory and radiological characteristics of patients with IPMN and AIP with a cohort of patients with isolated IPMN.

RESULTS

Five hundred and nineteen patients were included in this retrospective study. Sixteen patients had concomitant IPMN and AIP(3%); 61 patients had isolated AIP (12%); 442 patients had isolated IPMN (85%). The prevalence of IPMN in patients with AIP was higher than that observed in the general population (21%vs8-10%). Worrisome Features and High-Risk Stigmata were more frequently observed in IPMN occurring together with AIP compared to isolated IPMN(p < 0.05). Based on radiological features IPMN in the context of AIP was more frequently of main-duct type compared to isolated IPMN(p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that AIP represents a chronic inflammatory condition that might favor IPMN development with high-risk features. Prolonged surveillance of these patients and longitudinal studies are required to further test the association with AIP and malignant and pre-malignant conditions.

Gastric Varices Rupture due to Splenic Vein Obstruction Associated with Autoimmune Pancreatitis

A 60-year-old man with a high IgG4 level was found to have pancreatic tail enlargement on computed tomography (CT), and autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) was confirmed by a histological diagnosis. He was treated with prednisolone for one year and seven months, at which point his treatment finished. Four months later, however, he had hematemesis from gastric varices. CT showed recurrence of pancreatic tail enlargement with obstruction of the splenic artery and vein and formation of collateral blood vessels to the gastric fornix. Endoscopic injection sclerotherapy was performed, and he underwent splenectomy. This case highlights the importance of paying attention to peripancreatic vascular abnormalities during follow-up of AIP patients.

AGA Clinical Practice Update on the Epidemiology, Evaluation, and Management of Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency: Expert Review

DESCRIPTION

Exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI) is a disorder caused by the failure of the pancreas to deliver a minimum/threshold level of specific pancreatic digestive enzymes to the intestine, leading to the maldigestion of nutrients and macronutrients, resulting in their variable deficiencies. EPI is frequently underdiagnosed and, as a result, patients are often not treated appropriately. There is an urgent need to increase awareness of and treatment for this condition. The aim of this American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Clinical Practice Update Expert Review was to provide Best Practice Advice on the epidemiology, evaluation, and management of EPI.

METHODS

This Expert Review was commissioned and approved by the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Institute Clinical Practice Updates Committee (CPUC) and the AGA Governing Board to provide timely guidance on a topic of high clinical importance to the AGA membership, and underwent internal peer review by the CPUC and external peer review through standard procedures of Gastroenterology. These Best Practice Advice statements were drawn from a review of the published literature and from expert opinion. Because systematic reviews were not performed, these Best Practice Advice statements do not carry formal ratings regarding the quality of evidence or strength of the presented considerations. Best Practice Advice Statements BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 1: EPI should be suspected in patients with high-risk clinical conditions, such as chronic pancreatitis, relapsing acute pancreatitis, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, cystic fibrosis, and previous pancreatic surgery. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 2: EPI should be considered in patients with moderate-risk clinical conditions, such as duodenal diseases, including celiac and Crohn's disease; previous intestinal surgery; longstanding diabetes mellitus; and hypersecretory states (eg, Zollinger-Ellison syndrome). BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 3: Clinical features of EPI include steatorrhea with or without diarrhea, weight loss, bloating, excessive flatulence, fat-soluble vitamin deficiencies, and protein-calorie malnutrition. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 4: Fecal elastase test is the most appropriate initial test and must be performed on a semi-solid or solid stool specimen. A fecal elastase level <100 μg/g of stool provides good evidence of EPI, and levels of 100-200 μg/g are indeterminate for EPI. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 5: Fecal elastase testing can be performed while on pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 6: Fecal fat testing is rarely needed and must be performed when on a high-fat diet. Quantitative testing is generally not practical for routine clinical use. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 7: Response to a therapeutic trial of pancreatic enzymes is unreliable for EPI diagnosis. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 8: Cross-sectional imaging methods (computed tomography scan, magnetic resonance imaging, and endoscopic ultrasound) cannot identify EPI, although they play an important role in the diagnosis of benign and malignant pancreatic disease. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 9: Breath tests and direct pancreatic function tests hold promise, but are not widely available in the United States. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 10: Once EPI is diagnosed, treatment with pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (PERT) is required. If EPI is left untreated, it will result in complications related to fat malabsorption and malnutrition, having a negative impact on quality of life. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 11: PERT formulations are all derived from porcine sources and are equally effective at equivalent doses. There is a need for H2 or proton pump inhibitor therapy with non-enteric-coated preparations. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 12: PERT should be taken during the meal, with the initial treatment of at least 40,000 USP units of lipase during each meal in adults and one-half of that with snacks. The subsequent dosage can be adjusted based on the meal size and fat content. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 13: Routine supplementation and monitoring of fat-soluble vitamin levels are appropriate. Dietary modifications include a low-moderate fat diet with frequent smaller meals and avoiding very-low-fat diets. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 14: Measures of successful treatment with PERT include reduction in steatorrhea and associated gastrointestinal symptoms; a gain of weight, muscle mass, and muscle function; and improvement in fat-soluble vitamin levels. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 15: EPI should be monitored and baseline measurements of nutritional status should be obtained (body mass index, quality-of-life measure, and fat-soluble vitamin levels). A baseline dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry scan should be obtained and repeated every 1-2 years.

Autoimmune pancreatitis and micronutrients

INTRODUCTION

Nutritional deficiencies, including fat-soluble vitamins and minerals have been detected in many autoimmune diseases, including those involving the digestive system, but have yet to be assessed in autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP). The aim of the present study was to determine the prevalence of micronutrient deficiencies in patients with AIP as well as to investigate their relationship with relapse.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analysed medical records of patients treated for AIP. Demographic and clinical data were collected.

RESULTS

One hundred patients were included in the final analysis. The male-to-female ratio was 2.5:1; median age at diagnosis was 57 years (range 19-85). Median follow-up was 53 months, and during this time, 38% of patients suffered from at least one micronutrient deficiency. The most prevalent micronutrient deficiencies were vitamin D (16.1%) and zinc (25.5%). Relapse was observed in 37% of the AIP patients. Initial analysis showed that AIP relapse was associated with any micronutrient deficiency as well as zinc and vitamin D deficiency, but after stratifying for AIP type 1 and adjusting for PEI and elevated IgG4 levels, the association ceased to be statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Zinc and vitamin D deficiencies may be common in patients with AIP, indicating that these micronutrients might play a role in the natural course of AIP. Importantly, any micronutrient deficiency may be prevalent even in the light of treated PEI, which emphasizes the potential of micronutrients as an additional tool in the workup and follow-up of AIP patients.

Challenges for clinicians treating autoimmune pancreatitis: Current perspectives

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is a rare disease clinically characterized by obstructive jaundice, unintentional weight loss, acute pancreatitis, focal pancreatic mass, and diabetes. AIP is classified into two subtypes - type 1 and type 2 - according to pathological findings, clinical features, and serology test results, but some cases may be defined as type not otherwise in the absence of pathological findings and inflammatory bowel disease. To address the differences in diagnostic criteria by country, standard diagnostic criteria for AIP were proposed in 2011 by an international consensus of expert opinions. Differential diagnosis of AIP from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is important but remains challenging for clinicians. Fortunately, all subtypes of AIP show dramatic response to steroid treatment. This review discusses the current perspectives on the diagnosis and management of AIP in clinical practice.

Autoimmune pancreatitis: A bibliometric analysis from 2002 to 2022

Background/Objectives

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is a distinct form of pancreatic inflammatory disease that responds well to glucocorticoid therapy. Knowledge on AIP has rapidly evolved over the past two decades. Based on bibliometric analysis, this study aimed to assess the research status of AIP over the past two decades and determine the research focus and emerging topics.

Methods

AIP-related publications published between January 1, 2002, and June 6, 2022, were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection. Bibliometric data were analyzed using HisCite, VOSviewer, CiteSpace, and bibliometrix package. Annual output, leading countries/regions, active institutions and authors, core journals and references, and keywords of AIP were evaluated.

Results

Overall, 1,772 publications were retrieved from 501 journals by 6,767 authors from 63 countries/regions. Japan published articles on AIP the most (n=728, 41.1%), followed by the United States (n=336, 19%), Germany (n=147, 8.3%), China (n=127, 7%), and Italy (n=107, 6%). The top three most prolific authors were Terumi Kamisawa from Tokyo Metropolitan Komagome Hospital (n=117), Kazuichi Okazaki from Kansai Medical University (n=103), and Shigeyuki Kawa from Matsumoto Dental University (n=94). Pancreas was the most productive journal regarding AIP research (n=95), followed by the Journal of Gastroenterology (n=67), Internal Medicine (n=66), Pancreatology (n=63), and World Journal of Gastroenterology (n=62). "Diagnosis" was the most mentioned keyword. "Risk," "malignancy," "outcome," "22-gauge needle," and "fine-needle aspiration" were recognized as emerging topics.

Conclusion

Japan was the leading country in AIP research. Research papers were mainly published in specialized journals. Diagnosis was the research focus. Long-term outcomes and pancreatic tissue acquisition were recognized as research frontiers for AIP.