Limitation of neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging for the detection of focal cortical dysplasia with a “transmantle sign”

NODDI in clinical research

Diffusion MRI (dMRI) has proven to be a useful imaging approach for both clinical diagnosis and research investigating the microstructures of nervous tissues, and it has helped us to better understand the neurophysiological mechanisms of many diseases. Though diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) has long been the default tool to analyze dMRI data in clinical research, acquisition with stronger diffusion weightings beyond the DTI regimen is now possible with modern clinical scanners, potentially enabling even more detailed characterization of tissue microstructures. To take advantage of such data, neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI) has been proposed as a way to relate the dMRI signal to tissue features via biophysically inspired modeling. The number of reports demonstrating the potential clinical utility of NODDI is rapidly increasing. At the same time, the pitfalls and limitations of NODDI, and general challenges in microstructure modeling, are becoming increasingly recognized by clinicians. dMRI microstructure modeling is a rapidly evolving field with great promise, where people from different scientific backgrounds, such as physics, medicine, biology, neuroscience, and statistics, are collaborating to build novel tools that contribute to improving human healthcare. Here, we review the applications of NODDI in clinical research and discuss future perspectives for investigations toward the implementation of dMRI microstructure imaging in clinical practice.

Comparison of NODDI and spherical mean signal for measuring intra-neurite volume fraction

PURPOSE

Neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI) is a clinically feasible approach to measure intra-neurite volume fraction (fin). However, the sophisticated fitting procedure takes several hours. And the NODDI model relied on several questionable assumptions. Recent analytical work demonstrated that fin could be simply calculated from the spherical mean signal (MEANS) averaged over all gradient directions with a more solid theoretical foundation. The current study aims to compare NODDI and MEANS for measuring fin in human brain and investigate the potential of MEANS as a fast approach in clinics.

METHODS

NODDI fin and MEANS fin were measured and compared on the same dataset. NODDI fin was obtained using the NODDI MATLAB Toolbox. MEANS fin is the product of the spherical mean signal and 2bD/π, where D is the intra-neurite intrinsic diffusivity.

RESULTS

NODDI fin and MEANS fin maps are similar. The voxel-by-voxel correlation suggests that NODDI fin and MEANS fin are approximately equivalent to each other.

CONCLUSION

MEANS may have potential to serve a fast and simple approach to estimate fin in clinics.