Investigating centering, scan length, and arm position impact on radiation dose across 4 countries from 4 continents during pandemic: Mitigating key radioprotection issues

Use of a 3D camera for automated patient positioning for chest-abdomen-pelvis CT scans: Effect on positioning accuracy and patient dose

INTRODUCTION

3D positioning cameras that automate the positioning of patients with respect to the CT isocentre have been developed and are in common use in CT departments. This study aimed to compare the performance of radiographers and a 3D camera system with respect to positioning accuracy and the effect on patient radiation dose for chest-abdomen-pelvis scans.

METHODS

Patient positioning and dose data obtained from a dose management system was evaluated over a two-month period for patients positioned with (CAMon) and without (CAMoff) the positioning camera. Median vertical and lateral offset values were compared between the groups whilst doses were evaluated as a function of patient water equivalent diameter (WED) for the thorax and abdomen-pelvis acquisitions for both cohorts.

RESULTS

Radiographers demonstrated high levels of positioning accuracy, however significant improvements in median vertical offset were identified for the CAMon cohort for both thorax (8 mm vs. 17 mm (p = 0.001)) and abdomen-pelvis (7 mm vs. 16 mm (p = 0.003)) scans. The percentage of patients positioned within 5 mm of the isocentre was 39.0% and 16.1% for the CAMon and CAMoff cohorts. For CAMoff scans, 77.4% of patients were positioned below the isocentre, but this was reduced to 45.8% for CAMon scans. No significant changes in dose as a function of WED were identified related to the camera use (thorax: p = 0.569, abdomen-pelvis: p = 0.760).

CONCLUSION

Use of a 3D camera delivered significant improvements in the accuracy and reproducibility of patient positioning when compared with radiographers.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Improvements in positioning accuracy were observed at the research site and hence positioning camera use has the potential to become standard practice in CT to help ensure appropriate doses are delivered to patients according to their size.

Effect of technologist and patient attributes on centering for body CT examinations: Influence of cultural and ethnic factors

There are no published data on the effect of patient and technologist gender and ethnicity attributes on off-centering in CT. Therefore, we assessed the impact of patient and technologist variations on off-centering patients undergoing body CT. With institutional review board approval, our retrospective study included 1000 consecutive adult patients (age ranged 22–96 years; 756 males: 244 females) who underwent chest or abdomen CT examinations. We recorded patient (age, gender, nationality, body weight, height,), technologist gender, and scan-related (scanner vendor, body region imaged, scan length, CT dose index volume, dose length product) information. Lateral and anteroposterior (AP) diameters were recorded to calculate effective diameter and size-specific dose estimate (SSDE). Off-centering represented the distance between the anterior-posterior centers of the scan field of view and the patient at the level of carina (for chest CT) and iliac crest (for abdomen CT). About 76% of the patients (760/1000) were off-centered with greater off-centering for chest (22 mm) than for abdomen (15 mm). Although ethnicity or patient gender was not a significant determinant of off-centering, technologist-patient gender mismatch was associated with a significantly greater frequency of off-centering (p<0.001). Off-centering below the gantry isocenter was twice as common as off-centering above the gantry isocenter (p<0.001). The latter occurred more frequently in larger patients and was associated with higher radiation doses than those centered below the isocenter (p<0.001). Technologists’ years of experience and patient factors profoundly affect the presence and extent of off-centering for both chest and abdomen CTs. Larger patients are more often off-centered than smaller patients.

PRACTICAL CHALLENGES WITH IMAGING COVID-19 IN BRAZIL: MITIGATION IN AND BEYOND THE PANDEMIC

Computed tomography (CT) provides useful information in patients with known or suspected COVID-19 infection. However, there are substantial variations and challenges in scanner technologies and scan practices that have negative effect on the image quality and can increase radiation dose associated with CT.

OBJECTIVE

In this article, we present major issues and challenges with use of CT at five Brazilian CT facilities for imaging patients with known or suspected COVID-19 infection and offer specific mitigating strategies.

METHODS

Observational, retrospective and prospective study of five CT facilities from different states and regions of Brazil, with approval of research and ethics committees.

RESULTS

The most important issues include frequent use of CT, lack of up-to-date and efficient scanner technologies, over-scanning and patient off-centring. Mitigating strategies can include updating scanner technology and improving scan practices.