Outcomes of laparoscopic sacropexy in women over 70: A comparative study

Robotic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse in elderly women: comparative analysis of safety and efficacy versus younger women

INTRODUCTION

Pelvic organ prolapse is a condition with high prevalence in elderly women. With increasing life expectancy and a desire for improved quality of life, a rise in the frequency of surgical treatments for these women is anticipated. The aim is to compare complication, success, and satisfaction rates among elderly patients (aged >70 years) in comparison to younger women undergoing robotic sacrocolpopexy, thereby assessing the safety and efficacy of this surgery in this group of patients.

METHOD

A prospective observational comparative study of 123 robotic sacrocolpopexies conducted between December 2016 and June 2022. Patients were stratified by age (cutoff point: 70 years). Baseline characteristics, type, and grade of prolapse, intra and postoperative data, complications, functional and anatomical outcomes, and satisfaction levels were collected.

RESULTS

Among the 123 patients, 62.6% were under 70 years old, while 37.4% were 70 years or older, exhibiting similar baseline characteristics, prolapse grade, and type. The percentages of intraoperative (6.5%) and postoperative complications (4.4-9%) were comparable in both age groups. Furthermore, success and satisfaction rates exceeded 90%, with no significant differences between women under and over 70 years during a two-year follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Robotic sacrocolpopexy is at least as effective and safe in women aged 70 years or older as in younger individuals, with no higher rates of intra and postoperative complications and similar rates of anatomical and subjective success.

Effect of age in women undergoing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: A retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether elderly women (≥65 years) have an increased risk of complications and lower success when undergoing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) compared with younger women (<65 years).

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of all LSC procedures performed from August 2014 to February 2021 by a single urogynecologic surgeon in an academic affiliated hospital system. Charts were identified through procedure codes. Patient demographics, clinical, surgical, and postoperative data were collected. The primary outcome of this study was to compare complications associated with LSC, including intraoperative and postoperative complications. Secondary outcomes included subjective, objective, and composite success.

RESULTS

In total, 312 participants met the criteria. The mean age of the group who were younger than 65 years was 55.7 years (±6.5) and of the group aged 65 years or older was 69.3 years (±3.5). Racial demographics revealed no differences between the two groups. Patients aged 65 years or older had a statistically significant lower body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters), a higher rate of hypertension, smaller genital hiatus, and a larger anterior vaginal wall prolapse compared with the younger cohort. They also less often underwent a posterior repair. No statistically significant differences were found with regards to intraoperative and postoperative complications, including 30-day re-admission, between the two age groups. Both groups had high anatomic success rates, with no significant difference (<65 = 96.3%; ≥65 = 98.4%; P = 0.326). Those aged younger than 65 years compared with those aged 65 years or older had lower subjective success that was not significantly different (<65 = 62.8%; ≥65 = 71.0; P = 0.134). Composite success was noted to reach the threshold of a statistically significant difference in the group aged younger than 65 years compared with those aged 65 years or older (60.1% vs 71.0%; P = 0.0499).

CONCLUSION

In this study, elderly patients did not have increased intraoperative and postoperative complications after undergoing LSC. Similar rates of anatomic and subjective success were also found with younger patients having a lower composite success. Proper candidates for LSC should not be excluded based upon age.

Long term follow-up after minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a benign condition that can adversely affect women's quality of life. Minimally invasive mesh sacrocolpopexy is an effective surgical treatment for POP. This study aims to assess the perioperative, postoperative, and long term (10 years) outcome of a single institution cohort undergoing minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy.

METHODS

This retrospective study included all cases of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy performed between 2003 and 2016. Patients were contacted by phone in 2022 for long term follow-up. Data on operative time, length of hospital stay, conversion rate, perioperative injuries, early and late postoperative complications and subjective success rates were collected.

RESULTS

Ninety-five patients were included aged 60±12 years. Most patients (72%) presented grade 3 POP. Grade of prolapse (3±0.4 vs 3±0.5, p<0.01) and hospital stay (3±1.1 vs 3.1±1.7; p<0.01) were significantly higher in patients who developed early postoperative complications (1^st year). At long term follow-up (12±3 years), 48 patients responded. Nine subjects (19%) presented a subjective recurrence with bulge symptoms. Surgery satisfaction was of 79%. The most frequent de novo reported symptom was urge urinary incontinence followed by stress urinary incontinence. Three cases (3%) of mesh erosion were described, all occurred after the 5th postoperative year.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic mesh sacrocolpopexy is a safe surgical technique that shows satisfying and consistent long-term results despite the occasional onset of new urinary symptoms.

Comparison of first versus second line sacrocolpopexies in terms of morbidity and mid-term efficacy

To compare pelvic organ prolapse (POP) recurrence and morbidity between first and second line sacrocolpopexies. We conducted a retrospective chart review of all laparoscopic or robotic sacrocolpopexies for POP-Q stage ≥ 2, with or without a history of previous prolapse repair, performed with a similar technique between January 2012 and June 2019 in 3 European Gynecologic Surgery Departments. Patients were separated into two groups: first line sacrocolpopexy (FLS) and second line sacrocolpopexy (SLS). Each patient from the SLS group was age-matched with a patient from the FLS group. The primary outcome measure was reoperation procedures for recurrent POP defined as a symptomatic POP-Q stage ≥ 2 POP in at least one vaginal compartment. Secondary outcomes included operative time, intraoperative organ trauma, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative POP recurrence (operated on or not), global reoperation and mesh-related complications. During this period, 332 patients were included. After age-matching, 170 patients were analyzed: 85 patients in the FLS and SLS groups, respectively. After a mean follow-up of 3 years, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of recurrent POP (9.4% versus 10.6%, p = 0.7), recurrent POP reoperation (3.5% versus 5.9% p = 0.7), mesh-related reoperation (0% versus 2.4%, p = 0.5), global reoperation (3.5 versus 8.2%, p = 0.3), operative time (198 ± 67 min versus 193 ± 60 min, p = 0.5), intraoperative complications such as organ injury (4.7% versus 7.1%, p = 0.7) and blood loss > 500 mL (2.4% versus 0%, p = 0.5). Patients who underwent a first or a second line sacrocolpopexy seemed to have similar rates of prolapse recurrence and complications.

Effect of Age on Complications Rate and Surgical Outcomes in Women Undergoing Laparoscopic Sacrohysteropexy and Sacrocolpopexy

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To compare perioperative and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy/sacrocolpopexy in different groups of age.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective cohort study. Patients were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively (starting from 1 month after surgery, and then annually).

SETTING

The department of functional pelvic surgery & oncology a tertiary care center.

PATIENTS

All patients who underwent laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy/sacrocolpopexy, between July 2005 and December 2019 INTERVENTIONS: laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy/sacrocolpopexy.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The study population was divided into three groups, according to age at time of surgery: group 1- < 65, group 2- between 65-75, and group 3- > 75. The primary outcome was the rate of perioperative complications. The secondary outcome was the comparison of long-term results between the groups. Three hundred and thirty patients were included: 183 in group 1 (mean age 53.4±8.2), 92 patients in group 2 (mean age 69.2±2.9), and 55 patients in group 3 (mean age 79.3±.5). The overall perioperative complications rate (up to 30 days after surgery) was 5.7%. No differences between the groups in operative details and rates of perioperative complications were observed. During follow up period, 37 patients (11.2%) presented with prolapse recurrence (objective and/or subjective), the rates of prolapse recurrence, as well as long-term complications, were similar between the groups. Similarly, the groups did not differ in postoperative functional results except for postoperative stress urinary incontinence. A surgery for stress urinary incontinence was more common among patients in group 3 (group 1- 13.4%, group 2- 11.9%, group 3- 31.3%, p=.008).

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy/sacrocolpopexy is associated with low rates of perioperative and long- term complications. We did not find a difference in rates of complications and/ or long-term outcomes, between different age groups.

Uterine preserving technique in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: Laparoscopic pectopexy

OBJECTIVE

Apical prolapse constitutes an important part of pelvic organ prolapse. In this study, our aim was to investigate the effectiveness of laparoscopic pectopexy that we made by preserving the uterus in the surgical treatment of apical prolapse.

METHODS

A total of 36 patients with apical prolapse who wanted to preserve their uterus underwent laparoscopic rectopexy. Apical prolapse and sexual function of the patients were evaluated preoperatively and 12 months after surgery using the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) scale and Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12) sexual questionnaire form. Preoperative medical records and postoperative clinical results were recorded.

RESULTS

There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications in the patients who underwent laparoscopic pectopexy. The average duration of surgery was 48.7 ± 9.8 min. Two patients had a recurrence of apical prolapse. In the Aa, Ba, C, and D points in the POP-Q staging, significant changes were observed. Postoperative PISQ-12 scores improved significantly (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Uterine-preserving laparoscopic pectopexy is a safe, feasible, and effective method for treating pelvic organ prolapse. It also improved the PISQ-12 and POP-Q scores in POP patients. Laparoscopic pectopexy may increase a surgeon's technical perspective for pelvic organ prolapse surgery.

Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse in the elderly: safety and outcomes

Due to its low postoperative complication rate, vaginal surgery is the preferred intervention for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) in elderly patients. We aimed to assess outcomes and perioperative complication rates associated with laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) in elderly women. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 74 consecutive patients [52 (70.3%) aged <75 years; 22 (29.7%) aged ≥75 years] with POP who underwent LSC between August 2015 and December 2017. We evaluated preoperative risks using the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and complications, using the Clavien-Dindo grading (CDG). No between-group differences were observed in CCI. CDG indicated fewer perioperative complications in patients aged >75 years. Anatomical success rates at 15 months were 95.5% and 90.4% in patients aged ≥75 and <75 years, respectively. LSC has a high anatomical correction rate and few perioperative complications regardless of age. Thus, the appropriate surgical intervention method would depend on the patient's health and comorbidities.IMPACT STATEMENTWhat is already known on this subject? Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) is a superior method to vaginal surgery because of its anatomical and functional outcomes, particularly regarding sexual activity.What do the results of this study add? In this single-center study with a 15-month follow-up, we demonstrated that LSC has a high anatomical correction rate and few perioperative complications regardless of age at the time of surgery. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the rate of complications between the ≥75 and <75 years groups. Thus, LSC may be considered for women aged >75 years. However, in these elderly patients, the surgical method should be determined according to their health status and medical comorbidities.What the implications are of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Age should not be the basis for exclusion from laparoscopic procedures. Moreover, LSC is a suitable and valid option for elderly women with POP. As the study population consisted of a homogenous group of Japanese women, it lacks generalisability. Studies evaluating these outcomes are required in other populations.

National survey of surgical practices: Sacropexy in France in 2019

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Sacropexy is a reference surgical treatment for pelvic organ prolapse in women. The great variability in surgical techniques for this procedure is a source of bias that complicates analysis of the results of trials assessing it. Using the French guidelines issued in 2016 by the SCGP, AFU, SIFUD-PP, and CNGOF as a reference, we sought to inventory the surgical practices of the surgeons who perform these procedures.

METHODS

In November 2018, a questionnaire about the technical aspects of this procedure was distributed by email to the French physicians performing it. It was distributed to members of several professional societies (CNGOF, SCGP, and SIFUD) and to gynecologists practicing in clinics owned by the ELSAN group.

RESULTS

Of the 273 responders, 92% reported that they perform most operations laparoscopically. Overall, 83% of gynecologic surgeons used polypropylene prostheses (mesh); 38% routinely placed a posterior mesh, while the rest did so only in cases of clinical rectocele with anorectal symptoms. A concomitant hysterectomy was performed by 51% of respondents when the uterus was bulky and/or associated with substantial uterine prolapse. Finally, half the surgeons suggested the placement of a suburethral sling for women with stress urinary incontinence.

CONCLUSIONS

Although practices are largely consistent with the most recent guidelines, surgical techniques vary widely between surgeons, both in France and internationally.

Complications and clinical outcomes of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse

Evidence on laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) is lacking. Herein, we describe the complications and outcomes of LSC. This single-centre, retrospective cohort study included women with pelvic organ prolapse (POP) who underwent LSC between 2015 and 2017. Preoperative, intraoperative, postoperative, and demographic data were collected. We evaluated patients using the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification system and questionnaires. The primary outcomes were operative characteristics, perioperative complications, early postoperative complications, and anatomical results at 12 months. Forty-six patients (median age: 71 years) underwent LSC. The median follow-up period was 12.0 ± 5.0 (range: 11-26) months. The perioperative complications were bladder perforation and vaginal injury (2.2%). Two (4.3%) patients required reoperation for port-site hernia. One (2.2%) patient developed a retroperitoneal abscess, and one (2.2%) had worsened stress urinary incontinence after LSC. Three (6.5%) patients presented with recurrence of prolapse. LSC is safe and effective for POP.IMPACT STATEMENTWhat is already known on this subject? Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) has become a widely used intervention strategy during the last decade; nevertheless, few studies have reported its outcomes and complications.What do the results of this study add? We demonstrate that LSC for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) has favourable anatomical and voiding functional results, and few perioperative complications. However, it is important to preoperatively inform patients regarding the incidence of mesh-related postoperative complications, although they are not life-threatening, and secure their informed consent.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? We believe that the LSC procedure, because of its short-term and functional outcomes in the lower urinary tract discussed here, will be more commonly available in clinical practice as a feasible and safe surgical option for POP. However, prospective, large-sample studies should be performed to verify the efficacy of LSC, as further evaluation of the procedure is required.

Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy as the mainstay management for significant apical pelvic organ prolapse (LAP) study

STUDY OBJECTIVES

The primary aim of this study was to assess the clinical feasibility of a policy where laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) is the default procedure for the management of a significant apical pelvic organ prolapse (a-POP). As a secondary aim, we wanted to evaluate LSC outcomes in relation to women's preoperative assessment of their surgical fitness using the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status (ASA-PS) categorization.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

A university affiliated urogynecology center.

METHODS

All women with symptomatic a-POP (C ≥ -1) who attended the urogynecology clinic between the 1^st of January and the 31^st of December 2016 and had their surgery by the 31^st of May 2017 were included in the study. In our unit, routine follow-up appointments are arranged at 3 and 12 months post LSC.

INTERVENTIONS

Perioperative and mesh-related complications were assessed based on the Dindo-Clavien and IUGA/ICS classifications respectively. The preoperative outcome measures included Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) stage, Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI) and ASA-PS score. At follow-up women were asked to complete a PFDI, Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I), had their POP-Q staging and ultrasonographic assessment of mesh position and placement. The above measures are routinely collected as part of our standard practice. A preoperative ASA-PS score of <3 was used as a cut-off to dichotomies participants into low and high risk.

MAIN RESULTS

A total of 220 women attended our center during the study period because of POP. Of these, 146 women were diagnosed with a significant a-POP and 142 (97.2 %) women opted for a surgical repair. Of the 142 women, 128 (90.1 %) were deemed suitable for a type of LSC and 121 had their surgery before the 31^st of May 2017. There were no statistically significant differences in any of our collected perioperative, clinical, patient reported or ultrasonographic outcome measures when comparing women with ASA-PS scores of <3 or ≥3.

CONCLUSION

In a specialized urogynecology healthcare setting, it is feasible and safe to rely on LSC as the mainstay surgical procedure for the repair of a significant a-POP. However, it is imperative to ensure that technical skills and equipment requirements are fulfilled and maintained.

Comparison of laparoscopic techniques for apical organ prolapse repair - a systematic review of the literature

AIMS

Apical defect is a pelvic organ prolapse disorder, with 5%-15% prevalence. The aim of the study was to investigate methods of laparoscopic repair of apical defect and compare them with other techniques (open, vaginal, and robotic).

METHODS

A systematic search of the literature was conducted in MEDLINE/PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov databases using the following key words: apical prolapse and treatment procedures. The search was limited by using the humans filters. Only articles published in English between 2010 and 2018 were considered. Two independent authors reviewed the publications for inclusion on the basis of the following criteria: (a) use of laparoscopic techniques, and (b) apical support loss as indication for surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 1002 papers were initially identified; 24 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Four main laparoscopic procedures were found. The reported anatomical success rate (POP-Q < II stage) was 77%-100%, with patient satisfaction for pectopexy, laparoscopic sacropexy (LS), lateral ligament suspension and laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension (LUSLS) of 96.4%-97.6%, 71.0%-100%, 66.7%-87.8%, and 95%-95.5%, respectively. Major complications included hemorrhage, bladder, ureter, and/or bowel injuries were rare. Prolapse recurrences after LUSLS and LS were reported in 13.2% and 10.4% of patients, respectively; with reoperation rate for LS 2.2%-12.8%.

CONCLUSIONS

Most studies reported anatomical and subjective outcomes, with follow-up ranging from 1 month to >7 years. Success rates for laparoscopic and abdominal corrections of apical defect were similar; laparoscopy was superior in terms of perioperative blood loss, length of hospital stay, and recovery.

Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy is as safe in septuagenarians or elder as in younger women

Background

Data concerning laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSCP) in elder women are scarce. We compared intra-operative and early-postoperative complications associated with laparoscopic colpo-, cervico-, or hysteropexy in women under and above 70 years.

Methods

Retrospective assessment by an independent investigator of a prospective cohort of 571 consecutive women undergoing LSCP in a tertiary unit over an 18-year period. Data included were patient demographics, operative variables, intra-operative, and early (≤ 3 months) postoperative complications. Complications were graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification and mesh complications categorized using the International Urogynaecological Association (IUGA)-classification.

Findings

Median age was 66 (IQR 15, range 27-91) and 204 (35.7%) patients were older than 70 years. There were no deaths. Strategic conversion rate was 2.3% (13/571), the majority because of extensive adhesions yet early in our experience. Reactive conversion rate was 0.7% (4/571). Among 554 patients who had a completed LSCP, there were 20 intra-operative complications (3.6%), mostly bladder (1.3%) and vaginal (1.1%) injuries. Eighty-four patients had a total of 95 early-postoperative Dindo ≥ II complications (15.1%). Most common complications were infectious and treated medically (Dindo II). Clinically major complications are rare (III = 3.1% and IV = 0.2%). Reoperation for suspected bleeding (IIIb = 0.7%) was the most common reintervention, typically without demonstrable cause. Most mesh complications were vaginal exposures. Septuagenarians were not more likely to have an intra-operative (4.0 vs 3.3% < 70 years, p = 0.686) or early-postoperative complication (13.6 vs 16.0% < 70 years, p = 0.455) than younger patients. Mesh complications were also equally uncommon.

Conclusions

LSCP is as well-tolerated by women above 70 years as by younger women.

Comparative mid-term anatomical and functional outcomes following laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in women under and over 65: results from a prospective study

PURPOSE

To compare mid-term anatomical and functional outcomes following laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LS) between women under and over 65.

METHODS

Prospective and observational study involving patients with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse (POP) undergoing LS. Study population was stratified according to patients' age at the time of surgery. POP symptoms and impact on quality of life were assessed by PFIQ-7 and PFDI-20 questionnaires at baseline and during follow-up.

RESULTS

Among our study population (n = 72), 26 women were over 65 and 46 under 65. Mean follow-up duration was 17.6 months, and complete follow-up was available in 90% of patients. No differences between study groups were observed regarding surgery duration, length of stay, and peri-operative complications. Recurrence rate was 1.4% at 18 months of follow-up. Questionnaires analysis revealed a significant improvement in PFIQ-7 and PFDI-20 scores. We found no differences in post-operative scores between control and elderly groups. Sixteen patients experienced de novo stress urinary incontinence (22.2%), with no difference between groups (p = 0.7). Among them, seven required surgical management.

CONCLUSIONS

LS was associated with high anatomical success rate and good functional outcomes, regardless of age at the time of surgery. LS should thus be considered in women over 65. Beyond age, the route of surgery should be driven by patient's choice and medical condition.

[Could we perform vaginal mesh surgery for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse in elderly women?]

INTRODUCTION

Prevalence of pelvic organ prolapse will increase with the aging of the population. Concerning the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse, transvaginal route is often preferred for elderly women. However few data are available concerning transvaginal mesh surgery in this population. The aim of this study was to compare efficiency and complications of transvaginal mesh surgery between women aged over 75 and younger women.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A monocentric, retrospective study included all women who underwent anterior sacrospinous suspension with mesh for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. The primary endpoint was anatomical success at the last follow-up, defined by a pelvic organ prolapse stage 0 or 1 of POP-Q classification. The secondary endpoints were rate of complications and urinary, colorectal and sexual functional results.

RESULTS

We included 329 patients, 69 were under 75 years old and 260 were aged over 75. The median of follow-up was 12 months (IQR: 6). The rate of anatomical success was significantly higher in patients aged over 75: 92% versus 85% in younger patients (P=0.02). However this difference was no more significant in multivariate analysis after inclusion of confusions factors (P=0.82). The rate of perioperative complications was low and similar in the 2 groups even in multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

Utero-vaginal suspension using bilateral vaginal anterior sacrospinous fixation with mesh seems to achieve at least similar results between women aged more than 75 years and younger women. There is no excess risk of complications in elderly women.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.