An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis of the lived experience of multiple concurrent symptoms in patients with lung cancer: a contribution to the study of symptom clusters

To get through to survive: Exploring the symptom cluster management process during oncological treatment from the perspective of patients with lung cancer - A grounded theory study

PURPOSE

To explore the symptom cluster management process from the perspective of patients with lung cancer within the oncological care context.

METHODS

We used a constructivist grounded theory methodology to collect and analyze rich data from 15 patients with lung cancer via individual interviews and a two-dimensional symptom assessment scale.

RESULTS

A situational theoretical model describes the symptom cluster management process through the main category 'To get through to survive', with the category 'Handling symptom clusters' together with six sub-categories concerning the patients' management strategies and the category 'Living with symptom clusters,' together with two sub-categories describing the outcome in their daily life. Impacting conditions are incorporated in the model.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients often feel left to their own devices to deal with symptom clusters and may not understand or foresee problematic circumstances as they manage their situations on a day-to-day basis. When symptoms are normalized and accepted, patients do not ask for support, or support is not being offered to them. Healthcare professionals should consider the peril of normalizing symptoms and the patients' altered time perspective that stems from their approach of living one day at a time, in further development of nursing interventions and person-centered care for this population.

Interactive Health Literacy and Symptom Self-management in Patients With Lung Cancer: A Critical Realist Analysis

BACKGROUND

Patients with lung cancer experience multiple symptoms requiring self-management. Little is known about how self-management is influenced by interactive health literacy, defined as communicating with healthcare providers to obtain and process information.

OBJECTIVE

This study explored how interactive health literacy relates to symptom self-management among patients with lung cancer. A second aim explored how interactive health literacy might be integrated into the Individual and Family Self-management Theory.

METHODS

This study used a cross-sectional mixed-methods design. Quantitative data included demographics, the All Aspects of Health Literacy Scale, and the Memorial Symptom Assessment-Short Form. Qualitative data were collected using semistructured interviews. Data analysis followed a critical realist model.

RESULTS

Twelve adults who recently received treatment for lung cancer reported an average of 14 symptoms that caused moderate distress. Average interactive health literacy of the sample was in the moderate range. Participants' experiences of self-management differed based on their interactive health literacy. A generative mechanism proposes that those with higher interactive health literacy who accessed online information used this information as a basis for engaging with providers regarding potential symptom self-management strategies.

CONCLUSIONS

Interactive health literacy skills may play a role in patients' ability and confidence in symptom self-management through interactions with oncology providers. Further research should clarify the relationship between interactive health literacy, self-efficacy, and collaboration with oncology providers.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

The patient-provider relationship is a key factor influencing how patients obtain and process symptom self-management information. Oncology providers should implement patient-centered strategies to engage patients in symptom self-management.

A multiphase study protocol of identifying, and predicting cancer-related symptom clusters: applying a mixed-method design and machine learning algorithms

Objectives

In recent years, there has been increasing attention on the cluster approach to symptom management. Two significant challenges in the symptom cluster (SC) approach are identifying and predicting these clusters. This multiphase protocol aims to identify SCs in patients with advanced cancer as the primary objective, with the secondary objective of developing machine learning algorithms to predict SCs identified in the first phase.

Methods

The 2-MIXIP study consists of two main phases. The first phase involves identifying SCs, and the second phase focuses on developing predictive algorithms for the identified SCs. The identification of SCs involves a parallel mixed-method design (quantitative and qualitative). Quantitative and qualitative methods are conducted simultaneously and given equal importance. The data are collected and analyzed independently before being integrated. The quantitative part is conducted using a descriptive-analytical method. The qualitative analysis is conducted using a content analysis approach. Then, the identified SCs from both parts are integrated to determine the final clusters and use them in the second phase. In the second phase, we employ a tree-based machine learning method to create predictive algorithms for SCs using key demographic and clinical patient characteristics.

Conclusion

The findings of the 2-MIXIP study can help manage cancer patients' symptoms more effectively and enhance clinical decision-making by using SCs prediction. Furthermore, the results of this study can provide guidance for clinical trials aimed at managing symptoms.

Lived experiences of undergoing regular tumor screening in patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia types 1 and 2 (MEN1/MEN2)

Targeted screening programs for individuals with an increased risk for cancer have become increasingly available. Patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia (MEN), rare genetic conditions associated with the development of tumors in the endocrine glands, undergo intensive surveillance from an early age. Quantitative research has shown that patients with MEN experience fear of disease occurrence in themselves and their family members. However, little is known about the role that intensive, lifelong screening plays in the lives of individuals. This study investigates the lived experiences of patients with MEN undergoing regular tumor screening through an interpretative phenomenological analysis of interviews with 12 patients with MEN1, MEN2A, or MEN2B syndrome. Four experiential group themes are identified: coming to the foreground/fading into the background, relating to uncertainty, experiencing control, and familial context. Screening is characterized as an ambiguous experience that brings MEN to the foreground and may both exacerbate MEN-related uncertainty as well as provide a sense of control over the disease. The experience of undergoing screening is strongly influenced by the familial context, as participants care for and are cared for by family members and understand their disease through familial experiences. Good care according to patients with MEN includes providing family-centered care, addressing the impact on daily functioning and the meaning of illness, support in the interpretation of physical complaints, facilitation of patient experiences of control, and careful attunement to patient needs within a good doctor-patient relationship.

Exploring spirituality, religion and life philosophy among parents of children receiving palliative care: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Few studies have examined the spiritual environment of parents of children receiving palliative care in Southern European countries, which are mostly characterized by secularization (or the abandonment of traditional religiosity) and an increase of cultural and religious diversities resulting in a much broader spectrum of spiritual and religious beliefs. This study aimed to explore the parents' own spirituality, religiosity, and philosophy of life in coping with the care of their child with palliative needs.

METHODS

Qualitative interviews of 14 parents of children included in a palliative care program in a pediatric hospital in Barcelona, Spain. Inclusion criteria were parents of children who have been cared for the palliative care program for a minimum of 3 months and who displayed a willingness to talk about their personal experiences and gave written consent. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed by an independent service, and analyzed on a case-by-case basis using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis.

RESULTS

The three domains identified were life philosophy, relational, and transcendent. Life philosophy included principles that guided parents' decision-making, and how the onset of their child's serious illness had promoted a change in their values. Relational was focused on how they perceived themselves (e.g. motherhood), others (e.g. one's own child exceptionality), and the way they believed others perceived and supported them (e.g. relatives, friends, and healthcare providers). The transcendent domain involved God-related concepts, divinity and divine intervention (e.g. a miracle as an interpretive framework for that which cannot be explained within scientific knowledge limitations).

CONCLUSIONS

Inflexible categories identifying parents as having a particular religious faith tradition are not sufficient to capture the interrelation of knowledges (ethical, religious, scientific) that each parent generates when faced with their child receiving palliative care. Clinicians should explore parents' spirituality in an individualized way that responds to the uniqueness of their experiential process.

Study on sentinel symptoms and influencing factors of postoperative chemotherapy in patients with gastric cancer

PURPOSE

To explore the symptom clusters of gastric cancer patients receiving postoperative chemotherapy, identify the sentinel symptom of each symptom cluster, and compare the differences in sentinel symptoms of patients for gastric cancer with different characteristics.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study. Patients with postoperative gastric cancer who received chemotherapy in the medical oncology department from October 2021 to July 2022 were selected for the study using a convenience sampling method.The General Information Questionnaire and the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory Gastrointestinal Cancer (MDASI-GI) were used for the survey.

RESULTS

A total of 245 patients participated in the study. There were five symptom clusters in the patients. Fatigue, nausea, sadness, and taste alteration were the sentinel symptoms of the disease symptom cluster, gastrointestinal symptom cluster, emotional symptom cluster, and neurotoxic symptom cluster, respectively. No clear sentinel symptom was found in the gastric-cancer-specific symptom cluster. Statistically significant differences were observed in fatigue, nausea, sadness, and taste alteration among patients receiving postoperative chemotherapy for gastric cancer with differences in gender, duration since diagnosis, tumor site, chemotherapy regimen, chemotherapy cycle, red blood cell count, hemoglobin level, albumin level, plasma D-dimer level, indirect bilirubin level, glutamic pyruvic transaminase level, total bile acid level, and uric acid level.

CONCLUSION

People with postoperative chemotherapy for gastric cancer experience multiple concurrent symptoms. Of the multiple symptoms that occur simultaneously, patients tend to focus on 1 or 2 symptoms of particular significance and use the occurrence of 1 symptom to explain the others. The understanding of symptom clusters and sentinel symptoms could be beneficial to assess and manage both in postoperative patients with gastric cancer during chemotherapy. Clinical staff should use sentinel symptoms as the targets for symptom cluster evaluation and effective intervention.

Experience of living with symptom clusters in postoperative pancreatic cancer patients

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to describe symptom clusters (SCs), and symptom experiences in early postoperative patients with pancreatic cancer who are recovering at home.

METHODS

From October 2021 and April 2022,15 patients following pancreatic cancer surgery were recruited from a tertiary hospital in Jiangsu Province by maximum variation sampling. Semi-structured interviews were performed to collect data and thematic analysis was conducted to analyze the data.

RESULTS

Three themes were extracted from the data. The first theme "difference in symptom perception and cognition" illustrated factors such as patient knowledge, expected recovery status, and risk perception could influence patient symptom experience. Most patients actually reported fewer and less severe symptoms than previous studies. The second theme "the results of symptom cluster" demonstrated anorexia-distress SC, bowel-digestive related SC and sleep disturbance related SC, and anorexia-distress SC should be considered as the priority SC given its multidimensional significance for patients. The last theme described the patient's positive attitudes, behaviours and barriers to coping with symptoms, namely "symptom self-management experience".

CONCLUSION

There are differences in the perception and interpretation of SCs in postoperative pancreatic cancer patients. Understanding the meaning of individual differences in the experience of symptoms can assist patients in the management of SCs. Medical staff should combine patient self-management strategies and evidence-based data to provide appropriate support at different stages to improve patient symptom management and quality of life.

An Investigation of Symptom Clusters and Sentinel Symptoms During the First 2 Cycles of Postoperative Chemotherapy in Patients With Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer has the highest incidence and mortality of all cancers in China. Patients after a lobectomy experience serious physical and psychological symptoms during chemotherapy. Studies are lacking about symptom clusters (SCs) and sentinel symptoms during the postoperative chemotherapy period in lung cancer patients.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to explore SCs and sentinel symptoms during cycles 1 and 2 of postoperative chemotherapy in patients with lung cancer.

METHODS

Using a longitudinal study design, patients in treatment for lung cancer were measured at 2 separate points following a lobectomy: chemotherapy cycle 1 and chemotherapy cycle 2. The MD Anderson Symptom Inventory lung cancer-specific module and First Appearance of Symptoms Time Sheet were completed.

RESULTS

A total of 180 postoperative patients with lung cancer participated in the study. Four SCs were identified at chemotherapy cycle 1: gastrointestinal SC, respiratory tract SC, psychological SC, and somatic SC. The sentinel symptoms were nausea, cough, sadness, and fatigue. At chemotherapy cycle 2, similar SCs were identified, with the exception of merging the psychological SC and somatic SC, resulting in 3 clusters: gastrointestinal SC, respiratory tract SC, and psychological-somatic SC. The sentinel symptoms were nausea, cough, and fatigue.

CONCLUSIONS

Symptom clusters and sentinel symptoms were stable during the first 2 cycles of postoperative chemotherapy in patients with lung cancer.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

The understanding of SCs and sentinel symptoms could be beneficial to assess and manage both in postoperative patients with lung cancer during chemotherapy. Nurses should pay close attention to sentinel symptoms and develop effective interventions.

'Still living with it even though it's gone': Using interpretive phenomenological analysis to explore shared experiences of living with and beyond breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer

PURPOSE

Living with and beyond cancer is an increasingly common experience. While research is uncovering valuable individual experiences of those living with and beyond cancer, it has been argued that this idiographic approach is limited in outlook, reach and impact. This study contributes to the understanding of what it means to live with and beyond cancer by complementing idiographic knowledge with multiple perspectives from a group of participants who are living with and beyond cancer, to explore how individual experiences may be relevant to others.

METHOD

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with people who had received treatment for breast (n = 6), prostate (n = 6) or colorectal cancer (n = 6). Data were analysed using interpretive phenomenological analysis. The early findings were then shared with a wider group of people who had received treatment for breast, prostate or colorectal cancer (n = 26) in six focus groups, to explore whether they had similar experiences.

RESULTS

While individual accounts of living with and beyond cancer detail unique features specific to each person's experience, focus group discussions illustrated how participant life worlds interact and overlap. The findings identified thematic similarities within and between individual and group levels and across cancer types. Three super-ordinate themes describe the shared experience of living with and beyond cancer: i) the cancer shock, ii) managing cancer and getting through and iii) getting over cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

A multiple perspective approach informs our understanding of shared experiences of living with and beyond cancer. This knowledge can be used to direct, design, and deliver relevant supportive cancer care.

"If It Wasn't for Ethics, I Wouldn't Go Near Him": An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis of Caring for Patient-Prisoners in Kenya

Those caring for patient-prisoners experience distinct challenges that may impede effective treatment. Previous studies have investigated these issues from the perspective of forensic or correctional nurses, yet overlooked the lived experiences of nurses based in public health hospitals caring for patient-prisoners. In this study, semi-structured interviews were conducted with five nurses caring for patient-prisoners in public hospitals in Kenya. Interviews were analysed using interpretative phenomenological analysis. Four superordinate themes were identified: fear of patient-prisoner, time constraint, labelling, and optimism on recidivism. The fear of patient-prisoner theme included two sub-themes: perceived dangerousness and communication hindrance. The time constraint theme included three sub-themes: workload, short hospital stay, and task-oriented system. The labelling theme contained the loss of individual identity and representative of a group of sub-themes. Optimism on recidivism involved two sub-themes: reformation and rebuilding one's life. Future research should investigate the extent to which these impact on the patient-prisoner experience.

Lung cancer stigma: A concept with consequences for patients

BACKGROUND

Patients with lung cancer (LC) report lower quality of life (QoL) and higher levels of psychological distress compared with other cancer populations. Lung cancer stigma (LCS) may in part explain these findings.

AIM

We investigated the prevalence of patient-perceived lung cancer stigma (LCS) and its relationships to symptom burden/severity, depression, and deficits in health-related quality of life (HR-QoL).

METHODS

In this descriptive, observational, and cross-sectional study, 201 participants were sent questionnaires. These included the Cataldo Lung Cancer Stigma Scale (CLCSS), the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale, the Centre for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale, and the Quality of Life Inventory.

RESULTS

Participants were on average 69 years old, 52% women, 95% ever smokers, and 18.5% current smokers. The mean total CLCSS score was 53.1 (SD = 14.1; range = 31-94). LCS was significantly correlated with younger age (P < .001), greater social deprivation (P < .05), being unemployed (P < .001), depression (P < .001), symptom burden (P < .001), and HR-QoL deficits (P < .001). Symptom burden explained 18% of variance in LCS (P < .001). LCS explained 8.5% and 14.3% of the variance in depression (P < .001) and HR-QoL (P < .001), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Patients with lung cancer are vulnerable to LCS. Symptom burden can directly contribute to greater perceived LCS. Greater perceived LCS can be directly related to greater levels of depression and lower HR-QoL. A tailored approach is required to screen for LCS and implement interventions to enhance the psychosocial well-being of patients with perceived LCS.

Holistic services for people with advanced disease and chronic or refractory breathlessness: a mixed-methods evidence synthesis

Background

Breathlessness is a common and distressing symptom of many advanced diseases, affecting around 2 million people in the UK. Breathlessness increases with disease progression and often becomes chronic or refractory. Breathlessness-triggered services that integrate holistic assessment and specialist palliative care input as part of a multiprofessional approach have been developed for this group, offering tailored interventions to support self-management and reduce distress.

Objectives

The aim was to synthesise evidence on holistic breathlessness services for people with advanced disease and chronic or refractory breathlessness. The objectives were to describe the structure, organisation and delivery of services, determine clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and acceptability, identify predictors of treatment response, and elicit stakeholders’ evidence-based priorities for clinical practice, policy and research.

Design

The mixed-methods evidence synthesis comprised three components: (1) a systematic review to determine the clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and acceptability of holistic breathlessness services; (2) a secondary analysis of pooled individual data from three trials to determine predictors of clinical response; and (3) a transparent expert consultation (TEC), comprising a stakeholder workshop and an online consensus survey, to identify stakeholders’ priorities.

Results

Thirty-seven papers reporting on 18 holistic breathlessness services were included in the systematic review. Most studies enrolled people with thoracic cancer, were delivered over 4–6 weeks, and included breathing training, relaxation techniques and psychological support. Meta-analysis demonstrated significant reductions in the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) distress due to breathlessness, significant reductions in the Hospital Anxiety and Depressions Scale (HADS) depression scores, and non-significant reductions in the Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire (CRQ) mastery and HADS anxiety, favouring the intervention. Recipients valued education, self-management interventions, and expertise of the staff in breathlessness and person-centred care. Evidence for cost-effectiveness was limited and inconclusive. The responder analysis (n = 259) revealed baseline CRQ mastery and NRS distress to be strong predictors of the response to breathlessness services assessed by these same measures, and no significant influence from baseline breathlessness intensity, patient diagnosis, lung function, health status, anxiety or depression. The TEC elicited 34 priorities from stakeholders. Seven priorities received high agreement and consensus, reflecting stakeholders’ (n = 74) views that services should be person-centred and multiprofessional, share their breathlessness management skills with others, and recognise the roles and support needs of informal carers.

Limitations

The evidence synthesis draws predominantly from UK services and may not be generalisable to other settings. Some meta-analyses were restricted by reporting biases and statistical heterogeneity.

Conclusions

Despite heterogeneity in composition and delivery, holistic breathlessness services are highly valued by recipients and can lead to significant improvements in the distress caused by breathlessness and depression. Outcomes of improved mastery and reduced distress caused by breathlessness are not influenced by patient diagnosis, lung function or health status. Stakeholders highlighted the need for improved access to person-centred, multiprofessional breathlessness services and support for informal carers.

Future work

Our research suggests that key therapeutic components of holistic breathlessness services be considered in clinical practice and models of delivery and educational strategies to address stakeholders’ priorities tested.

Study registration

This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42017057508.

Funding

The National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Services and Delivery programme. Matthew Maddocks, Wei Gao and Irene J Higginson are supported by the NIHR Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRC) South London; Matthew Maddocks is supported by a NIHR Career Development Fellowship (CDF-2017-009), William D-C Man is supported by the NIHR CLAHRC Northwest London and Irene J Higginson holds a NIHR Emeritus Senior Investigator Award.

Patients and informal caregivers' experiences of burden of treatment in lung cancer and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): a systematic review and synthesis of qualitative research

OBJECTIVE

To identify, characterise and explain common and specific features of the experience of treatment burden in relation to patients living with lung cancer or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and their informal caregivers.

DESIGN

Systematic review and interpretative synthesis of primary qualitative studies. Papers were analysed using constant comparison and directed qualitative content analysis.

DATA SOURCES

CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsychINFO, Scopus and Web of Science searched from January 2006 to December 2015.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES

Primary qualitative studies in English where participants were patients with lung cancer or COPD and/or their informal caregivers, aged >18 years that contain descriptions of experiences of interacting with health or social care in Europe, North America and Australia.

RESULTS

We identified 127 articles with 1769 patients and 491 informal caregivers. Patients, informal caregivers and healthcare professionals (HCPs) acknowledged lung cancer's existential threat. Managing treatment workload was a priority in this condition, characterised by a short illness trajectory. Treatment workload was generally well supported by an immediacy of access to healthcare systems and a clear treatment pathway. Conversely, patients, informal caregivers and HCPs typically did not recognise or understand COPD. Treatment workload was balanced with the demands of everyday life throughout a characteristically long illness trajectory. Consequently, treatment workload was complicated by difficulties of access to, and navigation of, healthcare systems, and a fragmented treatment pathway. In both conditions, patients' capacity to manage workload was enhanced by the support of family and friends, peers and HCPs and diminished by illness/smoking-related stigma and social isolation.

CONCLUSION

This interpretative synthesis has affirmed significant differences in treatment workload between lung cancer and COPD. It has demonstrated the importance of the capacity patients have to manage their workload in both conditions. This suggests a workload which exceeds capacity may be a primary driver of treatment burden.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42016048191.

An interpretative phenomenological analysis of the experience of living with colorectal cancer as a chronic illness

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to explore the lived experiences of patients living with cancer as a chronic illness.

BACKGROUND

Due to recent advances in detection and treatment, cancer is now regarded as a chronic illness. However, living with cancer as a chronic illness can lead to a number of physical and psychosocial consequences all of which can lead to uncertainty over how patients view and plan for their future.

DESIGN

A longitudinal qualitative study.

METHODS

Individuals attending oncology follow-up clinics with their clinical nurse specialist at a hospital in the North East of England were invited to participate in two semistructured interviews over a 6-month period. A total of six individuals consented to participate, of whom two were women. One participant could not be contacted for the second interview, resulting in 11 interviews. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using interpretative phenomenological analysis.

RESULTS

Two super-ordinate themes emerged from the analysis: physical and psychological consequences of cancer and adapting to life after treatment.

CONCLUSION

The experience of future disorientation was common among participants; however, this was impacted on by a number of factors such as functional impairment and fear of recurrence. Furthermore, future disorientation does not appear to be stable and may ease as patients begin to adjust to the uncertainty of living with colorectal cancer as a chronic illness.

A qualitative exploration of distress associated with episodic breathlessness in advanced lung cancer

PURPOSE

Breathlessness is a distressing symptom, particularly common in those with advanced lung cancer. Previous research has identified the symptom occurrence of episodic breathlessness, identifying average frequency, duration and severity of episodes, but has not explored the distress specifically associated with these episodes. This study explored the distress associated with episodic breathlessness for adults with advanced cancer and the relative impact of three elements; frequency, duration or severity.

METHODS

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with four participants with advanced lung cancer. Analysis adopted an interpretative phenomenological approach.

RESULTS

A complex relationship existed between distress caused by episodic breathlessness and its frequency, duration and severity for study participants. Episodic breathlessness had a significant impact on participant's perceptions of self and previous experience effected how distressed they were by their breathlessness. The emotional work created by the symptom was considerable for individuals.

CONCLUSION

The study highlights the importance of recognizing symptoms as a combination of different experiences that may each cause different levels of distress. Initial evidence is provided that the emotional work involved for patients to self-manage each separate element of breathlessness should be considered in its treatment.

Living with breathlessness: a systematic literature review and qualitative synthesis

What is the experience of people living with breathlessness due to medical conditions, those caring for them and those treating them, with regard to quality of life and the nature of clinical interactions?Electronic databases (Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL Plus and PsycINFO) were searched (January 1987 to October 2017; English language), for qualitative studies exploring the experience of chronic breathlessness (patients, carers and clinicians). Two independent reviewers screened titles, abstracts and papers retrieved against inclusion criteria. Disagreements were resolved with a third reviewer. Primary qualitative data were extracted and synthesised using thematic synthesis.Inclusion and synthesis of 101 out of 2303 international papers produced four descriptive themes: 1) widespread effects of breathlessness; 2) coping; 3) help-seeking behaviour; and 4) clinicians' responsiveness to the symptom of breathlessness. The themes were combined to form the concept of "breathing space", to show how engaged coping and appropriate help-seeking (patient) and attention to symptom (clinician) helps maximise the patient's quality of living with breathlessness.Breathlessness has widespread impact on both patient and carer and affects breathing space. The degree of breathing space is influenced by interaction between the patient's coping style, their help-seeking behaviour and their clinician's responsiveness to breathlessness itself, in addition to managing the underlying disease.

Advancing Symptom Science Through Symptom Cluster Research: Expert Panel Proceedings and Recommendations

An overview of proceedings, findings, and recommendations from the workshop on "Advancing Symptom Science Through Symptom Cluster Research" sponsored by the National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR) and the Office of Rare Diseases Research, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, is presented. This workshop engaged an expert panel in an evidenced-based discussion regarding the state of the science of symptom clusters in chronic conditions including cancer and other rare diseases. An interdisciplinary working group from the extramural research community representing nursing, medicine, oncology, psychology, and bioinformatics was convened at the National Institutes of Health. Based on expertise, members were divided into teams to address key areas: defining characteristics of symptom clusters, priority symptom clusters and underlying mechanisms, measurement issues, targeted interventions, and new analytic strategies. For each area, the evidence was synthesized, limitations and gaps identified, and recommendations for future research delineated. The majority of findings in each area were from studies of oncology patients. However, increasing evidence suggests that symptom clusters occur in patients with other chronic conditions (eg, pulmonary, cardiac, and end-stage renal disease). Nonetheless, symptom cluster research is extremely limited and scientists are just beginning to understand how to investigate symptom clusters by developing frameworks and new methods and approaches. With a focus on personalized care, an understanding of individual susceptibility to symptoms and whether a "driving" symptom exists that triggers other symptoms in the cluster is needed. Also, research aimed at identifying the mechanisms that underlie symptom clusters is essential to developing targeted interventions.

Lung cancer diagnosed following an emergency admission: exploring patient and carer perspectives on delay in seeking help

PURPOSE

Compared to others, patients diagnosed with lung cancer following an emergency, unplanned admission to hospital (DFEA) have more advanced disease and poorer prognosis. Little is known about DFEA patients' beliefs about cancer and its symptoms or about their help-seeking behaviours prior to admission.

METHODS

As part of a larger single-centre, prospective mixed-methods study conducted in one University hospital, we undertook qualitative interviews with patients DFEA and their carers to obtain their understanding of symptoms and experiences of trying to access healthcare services before admission to hospital. Interviews were recorded and transcribed. Framework analysis was employed.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients and 10 carers plus 3 bereaved carers took part in interviews. Three patient/carer dyads were interviewed together. Participants spoke about their symptoms and why they did not seek help sooner. They described complex and nuanced experiences. Some (n = 12) had what they recalled as the wrong symptoms for lung cancer and attributed them either to a pre-existing condition or to ageing. In other cases (n = 9), patients or carers realised with hindsight that their symptoms were signs of lung cancer, but at the time had made other attributions to account for them. In some cases (n = 3), a sudden onset of symptoms was reported. Some GPs (n = 6) were also reported to have made incorrect attributions about cause.

CONCLUSION

Late diagnosis meant that patients DFEA needed palliative support sooner after diagnosis than patients not DFEA. Professionals and lay people interpret health and illness experiences differently.

'It gets into your head as well as your body': The experiences of patients with cancer during oncology treatment with curative intent

This study explored the psychosocial experiences of patients with cancer during the course of oncology treatment with curative intent. Our aim was to gather in-depth insights into the shared elements of oncology treatment across a range of cancer types. A total of 10 individuals undergoing oncology treatment participated in semi-structured interviews. Six themes were identified using interpretative phenomenological analysis: diminished well-being, perceived role changes in intimate relationships, heightened awareness of limited time, a new order of priorities, taking things as they come and development of trust in health professionals. These themes indicate relevant areas of patients' well-being, which might be enhanced through psychosocial support services.

Impact of Symptom Clusters on Quality of Life Outcomes in Patients from Japan with Advanced Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancers

OBJECTIVE

Identify symptom clusters based on symptoms experienced by patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung cancers (NSCLCs), and examine the relationship between the symptom clusters and impairment in everyday life and quality of life (QOL).

METHODS

Using the M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory, 9 symptom items and the QOL Questionnaire (QLQ-C-30) evaluation apparatus from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, we evaluated symptom severity, interference in daily life, and QOL. Factor analysis and multiple regression analysis techniques were used.

RESULTS

Sixty patients with advanced NSCLCs seen in pulmonary medicine departments were included in the study. The average age of patients was 64.33 (standard deviation = 11.40). Thirty-six were male and 24 were female. Three symptom clusters were identified as fatigue/anorexia cluster (dry mouth, altered the sense of taste, drowsiness, fatigue/tiredness, and lack of appetite), pain cluster (anxiety, sadness, and pain), numbness cluster (numbness, leg weakness, and distress). The pain cluster had the strongest influence (adjusted R2 = 0.355) on daily life (emotions) while the numbness cluster most strongly affected walking. The fatigue/anorexia cluster explained 22.7% of role function variance. This symptom clustering may be unique among patients with advanced NSCLCs.

CONCLUSIONS

Each of these clusters affected QOL and everyday life with varying degrees of influence. In clinical screening assessments, focusing on symptom clusters could provide tailored management strategies for patients with advanced NSCLCs. These care strategies may improve outcomes specifically for advanced NSCLCs patients.

Care assistant experiences of dementia care in long-term nursing and residential care environments

Care assistants have a unique insight into the lives of service users and those factors which may impede or enhance the delivery of high quality dementia oriented care. To address the paucity of research in this area, the present study examined care assistant experiences of dementia care in British long-term residential and nursing environments. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with eight care assistants and transcripts were analysed using interpretive phenomenological analysis. Super-ordinate themes emerging from the data were psychological wellbeing of the care assistant, barriers to effective dementia care, the dementia reality and organisational issues within the care environment. The study revealed important deficiencies in understanding and varying levels of dementia training. Whilst person centred strategies were being implemented, task orientated care remained dominant. Furthermore, care assistants reported taking the perspectives of those with dementia into account, and actively using these to develop relationship centred care.

Identifying Severe Adverse Event Clusters Using the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events

PURPOSE

Exploring the relationships among adverse events is important because those that arise from a common mechanism are amenable to a common intervention, which can improve symptom management, quality of life, and treatment adherence. To date, symptom cluster studies have used patient-reported data, which are not always available in clinical trials. In this study, we proposed using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) to identify adverse event clusters because the CTCAE data are collected as standard practice and can therefore be used when patient-reported outcomes are unavailable.

METHODS

The CTCAE data from a randomized clinical trial conducted by SWOG that compared docetaxel plus estramustine versus mitoxantrone plus predinsone in patients with advanced prostate cancer were used to identify severe adverse event clusters. A variable based hierarchical cluster analysis was conducted using the CTCAE for the 323 patients who experienced at least one grade 3 or higher adverse event.

RESULTS

A total of 109 adverse event types were captured using the CTCAE. Four clusters had moderate associations: nausea, vomiting, and anorexia (n = 35, r = 0.45); joint/bone(myalgia, arthralgia, and arthritis) and muscle weakness (n = 26, r = 0.29); anemia and transfusion (n = 20, r = 0.38); and neutrophils/granulocytes, febrile neutropenia, and leukocytes/lymphopenia (n = 114, r = 0.29). Two clusters had weak associations: fatigue/malaise/lethargy and dehydration (n = 66, r = 0.12); and constipation, infection without neutropenia, and abdominal pain/cramping (n = 35, r = 0.13).

CONCLUSION

Several severe adverse event clusters were identified in patients with advanced prostate cancer. Identifying adverse event clusters using CTCAE data from clinical trials is feasible.